Upload
david-garrett
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Economic Governance & Public Financial Management for Climate Change Policies in
Indonesia
Efa Yonnedi (Andalas University)
Kurnya Roesad (Australian National University)
Frank Jotzo (Australian National University)
Policy research paper for
The 5th CRISU-CUPT Conference
Chiang Mai, 8-9 July 2010
2
I. Introduction Research questions
How can Indonesia’s central government structure its economic governance framework to better tap into international carbon finance?
How do regions benefit from carbon finance flows? Methodology
Interviews Review of policy documents, market data etc. Jakarta and Sumatra components
Funding Australia-Indonesia Governance Research Partnership (AIGRP) Additional funding from Environmental Economics Research Hub,
ANU
3
International climate policy and carbon finance and why it matters to Indonesia
A sophisticated international climate policy and carbon finance architecture is evolving
Post-Kyoto mechanisms: scaling up, broadening out – the economic crisis may not deter for long
Indonesia: large potential for reducing emissions exists, but other domestic policy objectives take precedence
4
ODA
Private Investment Bilateral Multilateral
Voluntary & CSR
Capital Markets
National Mechanisms
Global Mechanisms
The Carbon Finance Framework
UNFCCC
CDM Global Environmental Facility
Adaptation Fund
Private Sector GOI
Mitigation & Adaptation
Local Government and Investment Community
CDM REDD (and other)
Budget
Global Financial Flows
Regional Mechanisms
International Financial Institutions (IFIs)
5
The Clean Development Mechanism Global project pipeline
expected offset credits 2,700 MtCO2-equivalent by 2012 prices: > 10 euro/t, total revenue > $ 40 billion to 2012
Largest project categories: industrial and energy Industrial gases, hydro, energy efficiency, landfill gas, fuel switching,
biomass CDM excludes deforestation, very limited in forestry
Indonesia’s CDM share Pipeline: 40 Mt = 1.4% of total Comparison: Indonesia 2.8% of developing country emissions excl
deforestation and agriculture Reduction potential much greater than realised under the CDM An issue of CDM coverage and procedures, and investment climate
6
Post-2012 necessities
Substantial emissions reductions in developing countries must be achieved to limit climate change Emerging global goal 50% reduction by 2050 Developing countries around half of global emissions right now, and
growing fast (combustion emissions growth >5% pa) Developing countries must be comprehensively involved
Will require support from high-income countries
Global CO2 emissions, business-as-usual
50%
Source: Garnaut, Jotzo & Howes China Update 2008
7
Post-2012 proposals Bali Roadmap
‘measurable, reportable and verifiable nationally appropriate mitigation actions’
sectoral agreements, deforestation (‘REDD’) financing, technology transfer
Policy proposals (Stern, Garnaut, many others) Comprehensive commitments/targets for developing countries ASAP,
supported by international trading Effective sectoral agreements fast Create incentives to slow deforestation fast Improve the CDM Provide substantial funding for technology development and diffusion
Indonesia CO2 emissions: history and a business-as-usual future
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Fossil fuel combustion
Land-use changeand forestry
Mt CO2/year
9
Large potential for mitigation in Indonesia, if policy frameworks are broadened
Electricity supply Power consumptions grows at around 7%pa, limited by supply capacity Expansion largely in coal-fired plants: 10,000 MW crash program Currently: ca 29,000 MW capacity, emissions 96 MtCO2, ca half of electricity
output from coal, emissions 61 MtCO2
South Sumatera expansion plan for new coal plants: 23,000 MW by 2015, 36,000 MW by 2025 implies roughly 100 MtCO2 by 2015, 160 MtCO2 by 2025
Compare CDM pipeline: ~8Mt/year to 2012
Industry: many options for energy savings eg cement plants – Semen Padang
Deforestation remains the big emissions source in the medium term
10
Mainstreaming climate change into the national economic governance framework
Indonesia’s climate change policy framework still evolving: complex coordination issues and competition for leadership
Integration beginning, but no clear low carbon development strategy or consistent climate finance approach – yet
Potential institutional overlaps: policy dialogue, climate finance and donor coordination to be resolved
The Climate Change Policy Framework
Ministries
Finance
Key Policy Documents National Climate Change Board Reports to President
Budget process
Bappenas
Environment
Forestry
Mines & Energy
National Development Planning: Indonesia’s Responses to Climate Change
Gov. Work Plan (RKP) 2010
Foreign Financing / Grant/ Loan
Coord. Economy
Coord. Welfare Annual Budget
(APBN)
Long-term Development Plan (RPJP) 2004-2025
Medium-term Development Plan (RPJM) 2009-2014
National Action Plan Addressing Climate Change
National Strategy on Forestry and REDD
National Energy Strategy
Donor Agencies
Implementation
Provincial and local governments
12
Practical barriers to carbon finance
To date mainly projects under the CDM, but the record falls short of overall emissions reduction potential
Sumatra case studies: investment climate, capacity and information especially of local governments, regulatory uncertainties (land tenure!)
National policies on energy an electricity not conducive for carbon finance: fuel subsidies, electricity tariffs.
Strategically, low carbon economy path in Indonesia:
Adopting ‘green’ taxation and fiscal policies aiming to reduce fiscal and energy price distortions.
Incorporating carbon finance into public and private investment decisions.
Engaging internationally to shape post-2012 climate investment architecture
13
Institutionally, Indonesia: A clearer division of labor between policy-
formulating and budget/finance coordinating agencies.
Clarify the role of the new National Climate Change Council (DNPI), especially with regard to its role as a policy-formulating agency.
14
CDM-specific reforms: Develop a national CDM plan (linked to an overall low carbon growth strategy) and
identify key sectors and programs (e.g. renewable power like geothermal, hydro or nationwide landfill gas flaring)
Consider establishing a public carbon investment or program agency to facilitate program implementation, speed up CDM application, monitoring and verification procedures, clarify trading and ownership of CERs.
Raise awareness in financial/banking sectors to increase lending to CDM projects Keep improving the general investment climate, as CDM investments are like any
other investment flows which respond to sound incentives and transparent governance regimes
Improve the communication flow between central government and regional government on carbon finance investment opportunities
Increase CDM training programs for regional and local policymakers
15
16
Main Story and Key Messages
International level Scaling up and broadening international carbon finance Comprehensively engage developing countries in mitigation effort
National level Integration of climate change policy into economic policymaking Policy coordination roles still evolving Carbon finance regime is limited to CDM projects
Regional level Significant barriers to CDM and carbon finance more broadly
Policy Outlook Need broader policy and financing framework Need clear economic incentives at all levels Need sound domestic investment climate
Terimakasih
17
18
Appendix
19
44. . Validation (4 months)Validation (4 months)
9. Certification and 9. Certification and IssuanceIssuance
8. Verification 8. Verification
6. Project Registration6. Project Registration
Bureaucracy: CDM project cycle
Project sponsor Accredited CDM auditor
CDM Executive Board ENVCF/Region
1. Project Identification Note plus financials (1 month),
5. Negotiate and sign Emission Reductions Purchase Agreement (ERPA)
7. Construction and start up
10. End of contract period (may be post-2012)
2. Project Design Document (2 months)
3. Bank Project due diligence (environmental and social safeguards)
20
Energy
Forests / Land
Indonesia’s GHG Emissions Sources
Forests / Land Use Projected Growth Stable Or
DecliningData Source: IFCA (2007)
Strong Fossil Fuels Growth Data Source: IEA 2004
Coal Oil Gas Emissions Growth '94-'04
Industry 31.9 35.4 50.7 118 48%
Electricity 54.9 25.2 9.9 90 170%
Transport 78.0 - 78 74%
Resident 41.0 9.0 50 71%
Total 86.8 179.6 69.6 336 80%
Prod’n Prot’d Pulp Palm Total
Above Ground Deforest 107 19 55 50 231
Planned "Conversion" 100 100
Peatland Deforest 88 43 131
Peat Drainage (not REDD) 469
Peat Fires (not REDD) 1,260
Total 207 19 143 93 2,191 All figures in MtCO2e. Forest data are
compiled from various years
21
Barriers: Distorted Energy Prices
Subsidies 24% (120.7 trn IDR)
Social Assistance 5% (24.2 trn IDR)
Transfer to Regions 30% (151 trn IDR)
Others 6% (31 trn IDR)
Interest Payments 11 %
(58 trn IDR) Capital Expenditures 7% (37 trn IDR)
Material Expenditures 6%
(33 trn IDR)
Personnel Expenditures 11% (
56 trn IDR)
Fuel Subsidies 15% (75 trn IDR)
Non-Fuel Subsidies 2% (12 trn IDR)
Fuel Subsidies Electricity Sector 4% (21 trn IDR)
Non-Fuel Subsidies Electricity Sector 3% (13 trn IDR)
Source: Compiled from World Bank (2007)
Central government expenditure components (percent of GDP in 2005)
Entry barriers to investment in power sector:
Fixed fuel subsidies and electricity tariffs do not provide clear price signals
Causing overconsumption
Provides less incentives to innovate and invest in renewable energy
22
Increased Environmental Expenditures
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
National nominal environmental expenditures
Environmental expenditures as % of total expenditures
bn IDR RKP 2009: around 1.7 trn IDR allocated to climate change actions with Public Works (23%) and Ministry of Forestry (21%) claiming the biggest shares.