Upload
ross-bell
View
219
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Development of radiation hard microstrip detectors for the CBM Experiment
Sudeep Chatterji
GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research
DPG Bonn
16 March, 2010
2
CBM Silicon Tracking System Layout
Fluka Simulation
STS has 8 stations of DSSDs, Strip Pitch ~ 58 m, Strip Width ~ 20 m, stereo angle ~ 7.5 0 Expected Radiation Damage ~ 1 x 1014 neq cm-2 year-1
Need detailed simulations to optimize device parameters to maximize VBD and minimize Noise. Also simulation needed to understand the impact of radiation damage.
1m
3
x set by strip pitchy set by stereo angle
3-Dimensional Grid
3-D TCAD simulation tools “SYNOPSYS” Sub packages
SentaurusInspectTecplotSPICE (Mixed Mode)
4
Stereo Angle in Strips
X-Y plane of the 3D grid. One can see there is a stereo angle on either side of 7.50.
5
Understanding the Geometry
Using SYNOPSYS TCAD 3-D simulation package Silicon volume ~ Cuboid (Six Rectangular faces). Dopant Implants, P-Stop and Contacts ~ Parallelogram Oxide ~ Cuboid, Enough space needed at the corners for junction curvature (0.8*Junction Depth)
6
Determination of full depletion voltage
c
7
Determination of full depletion voltage
8
Potential & Electric Field Distribution
0 V
50V
9
Some Static Characteristics
CTotal = Cback+2*Cint
ENC α CTotal
Optimization needed to maximize breakdown voltage & minimize ENC
10
Radiation Damage in Silicon
The major effect expected from bulk damage is the change in the effective carrier concentration (Neff) leading to Type Inversion.
The change in Neff is parameterized using Hamburg model:
eqK
TtNNTtNTtNNN aeqYeqcaeqAaeqeffeffeff
0/1/1
))(,()())(,())(,(0,
The change in Minority carrier lifetime is parameterized using Kraners model:
For high quality oxide, the value of surface oxide charge (Q f) is expected to be 3e11cm-2 (for non-irradiated detector) while after irradiation Q f increases and saturates at about 1e12 cm-2. Flatband Voltage gives an approx. of Qf.
Year Fluence (assumed each year) x 1014 (neq/cm2)
Integrated Fluencex 1014 (neq/cm2)
Neff x 1012
(cm-3)
1 1 1 - 1.73
2 1 2 - 5.47
3 1 3 - 9.87
4 1 4 - 14.8
5 1 5 - 19.25
6 1 6 - 23.78
11
Impact of Radiation Damage
Trap Model, University of Perugia
0.92.5*10-152.5*10-14CiOiEc+0.36Donor
0.95.0*10-145.0*10-15VVVEc-0.46Acceptor
1.6132.0*10-142.0*10-15VVEc-0.42Acceptor
η (cm-1)σh (cm2)σe (cm2)Trap
Energy (eV)Type VBD ↑ with fluence
Current ↑ by 3 orders Rint ↓ with fluence Detailed study needed
12
Transient Simulations
Can simulate the passage of Heavy Ion, α-particle and Laser. Can include angle in the passage of MIPs. Plan to do complete scan of interstrip region and compare with test beam data.
13
Summary
We need radiation hard Double Sided Silicon Strip detectors. TCAD simulation package, SYNOPSYS has been installed on
CBM batch farm and running. We are doing Mixed Mode simulation using SPICE models
available in Sentaurus. Have procured the Probe Station. Plan to carry out measurements before and after irradiation both
with proton and with neutrons. Carry out systematic annealing studies. Work closely with CiS, Erfurt on microstrip detector R&D.
14
15
Optimization of W/P & P-Spray Width
When W/P is too small, there is inappreciable impact of ↑ the strip width on VBD
A narrower strip width and a wide P-Spray width can reduce the ENC.
16
Optimization of P-Spray Dose
With ↑ in P-Spray dose, the VBD ↓
Using P-Spray rather than P-Stop seems better for detector performance
What happens at high radiation damage?
Mixed Mode Simulation (TCAD + SPICE)