66
THINKING CRITICALLY WITH PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical thinkers are able to look for flaws in arguments, resist claims that lack supporting evidence, and recognize that criticizing an argument is not the same as

1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

THINKING CRITICALLY WITH PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE

1

Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence.

Critical thinkers are able to look for flaws in arguments, resist claims that lack supporting evidence, and recognize that criticizing an argument is not the same as criticizing a person.

Page 2: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

THINKING CRITICALLY WITH PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE

2

Eight guidelines emphasized by the text:1. Ask questions- Be curious and willing to ask why.2. Define your terms- Be clear, concrete and precise3. Examine the evidence- Use reliable resources and

empirical evidence4. Analyze assumptions and biases- Analyze and test beliefs

(yours and others) that may be taken for granted5. Avoid emotional reasoning- question your support for an

argument…is it based in evidence6. Don’t oversimplify- gather multiple sources of supporting

evidence and do not generalize7. Consider other interpretations- even after generating a

possible explanation be willing to accept other possibilities8. Tolerate uncertainty- It may be difficult if not impossible to

determine an absolute answer and that’s okay

Page 3: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

ASKING QUESTIONS…. With hopes of satisfying curiosity, many

people listen to talk-radio counselors and psychics to learn about others and

themselves.

3

Dr. Crane (radio-shrink)

http://ww

w.nbc.com

http://ww

w.photovault.com

Psychic (Ball gazing)

Page 4: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

CRITICAL THINKING

Critical thinking does not accept arguments and

conclusions blindly.

It examines assumptions,

discerns hidden values, evaluates

evidence and assesses

conclusions.

4

The Amazing Randi

From The Secrets of the Psychics

Courtesy of the Jam

es Randi E

ducation Foundation

Page 5: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

CRITICAL THINKING LEADS TO A SCIENTIFIC ATTITUDE

5

The scientific attitude is composed of curiosity (passion for exploration), skepticism (doubting and questioning) and humility (ability to accept responsibility when wrong).

Page 6: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

THE NEED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE

Intuition & Common Sense have limits

6

Many people believe that intuition and common sense are enough to bring forth

answers regarding human nature.

Page 7: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

LIMITS OF INTUITION

Personal interviewers may rely too much on their “gut feelings”

when meeting with job applicants.

7

Taxi/ Getty Im

ages

Page 8: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

ERRORS OF COMMON SENSE

Try this !

8

Fold a piece of paper (0.1 mm thick) 100 times. How thick will it be?

800,000,000,000,000 times the distance between the sun and the earth.

Page 9: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

HINDSIGHT BIAS

Hindsight Bias is the “I-knew-it-all-along” phenomenon.

After learning the outcome of an event, many people believe they could have

predicted that very outcome. We only knew the dot.com stocks would plummet after

they actually did plummet.

9

Page 10: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

OVERCONFIDENCESometimes we think we know more than we actually know.

10

Anagram

BARGEGRABE

ENTRYETYRN

WATERWREATHow long do you think it

would take to unscramble these

anagrams?People said it would

take about 10 seconds, yet on average they took

about 3 minutes (Goranson, 1978).

Page 11: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE HOW DO PSYCHOLOGISTS EXPLAIN UNSEEN MENTAL PROCESSES? HOW DO THEY DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN OPINIONS AND EXAMINED CONCLUSIONS?

By using the Scientific Method as the basis for psychological research examined

conclusions can leads to a clear understanding of how people feel,

think, and act as they do! 11

Page 12: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

SCIENTIFIC METHOD

12

Collect Data/Make Observations

Generate an initial theory based on research

Page 13: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

RESEARCH PROCESS

13

Page 14: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

ASK QUESTIONS

The Scientific Method begins with wondering: What? Why? Or How?

In the example of depression…the psychologist may have wondered what

is the relationship between low self-esteem and depression

Page 15: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

THEORY

A Theory is an explanation that integrates principles, organizes events

and predicts behavior based on empirical evidence.

For example, low self-esteem possibly contributes to depression.

15

Page 16: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

HYPOTHESIS

A Hypothesis is a testable prediction, often prompted by a scientific attitude, to enable us to accept, reject or revise a

theory.

If people have low self-esteem then they are apt to feel more depressed.

(Note: The If/Then statement)

16

Page 17: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

RESEARCH OBSERVATIONS

Research would require us to administer tests and make further observations to

confirm or deny a hypothesis

In our example…Individuals who score low on a self-esteem test and high on a

depression test would confirm our hypothesis.

17

Page 18: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

THREE TYPES OF (BASIC) PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH

Descriptive Correlational Experimental

Page 19: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH

Descriptive Research

19

The purpose of this type of study is to describe and predict behaviors.

Page 20: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

VARIOUS DESCRIPTIVE METHODS INCLUDE:

20

Page 21: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION:Case Study

21

A technique in which one person or a small group is studied in depth to reveal

underlying behavioral principles. The study of this one individual may include an individual history, careful observation

and/or psychological testing.

Do animals have language?

Susan K

uklin/ Photo R

esearchers

Page 22: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

COVERT BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION:NATURALISTIC OBSERVATION

Naturalistic observation involves the observation, recording and measurement of behavior without

intrusion into the subjects natural or normal environment.

Observing and recording the behavior of animals in the wild and recording self-seating patterns in a

multiracial school lunch room constitute naturalistic observation. 22

Courtesy of G

ilda Morelli

Page 23: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

23

OVERT BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION:LABORATORY OBSERVATION

Observing and recording the behavior of animals and people in a controlled

environment enables the scientist to use more sophistic devices for measurement.

However, this environment may lead to participants acting differently because they

are in unusual surroundings.

Page 24: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATIONS:PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS OR INSTRUMENTS

Psychological tests, also called assessment instruments, are procedures for measuring and

evaluating a wide variety human traits, emotional states and behaviors.

Typically, tests require a response to a series of questions that can be scored and used for statistical analysis.

Page 25: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

PRINCIPLES OF TEST CONSTRUCTION

For a psychological test to be acceptable it must fulfill the following three criteria:

1. Standardization

2. Reliability3. Validity

Page 26: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

STANDARDIZATION

Standardizing a test involves administering the test to a representative sample of test

takers in order to establish a basis for meaningful comparison (a norm) and to

establish appropriate test procedures that can easily be duplicated.

Page 27: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

RELIABILITY

A test is reliable when it yields consistent results. To establish reliability researchers

establish different procedures:

1. Split-half Reliability: Dividing the test into two equal halves and assessing how consistent the scores are.

2. Reliability using different tests: Using different forms of the test to measure consistency between them.

3. Test-Retest Reliability: Using the same test on two occasions to measure consistency.

Page 28: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

VALIDITY

Reliability of a test does not ensure validity. Validity of a test refers to what the test is

supposed to measure or predict.

1. Content Validity: Refers to the extent a test measures a particular behavior or trait.

2. Predictive Validity: Refers to the function of a test in predicting a particular behavior or trait.

Page 29: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

SELF REPORTS:SURVEY

A technique for ascertaining the self-reported attitudes, opinions or behaviors

of people. This is usually done by questioning a representative sample that

is both random and proportional.

29

http://ww

w.lynnefeatherstone.org

Page 30: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLEIt is impossible to survey everyone in

any given population. It is necessary therefore to survey a group of individuals that accurately represents the larger population being studied.

The fastest way to know about the marble color ratio is to blindly transfer a few into a smaller jar and count them.

Page 31: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

SURVEY

Random Sample -ensures that everyone

in the larger population has an

equal chance of being selected as part of the representative

sample. If the survey sample is not random it may be biased and its results would not

be valid.31

Random Sampling

Errors in Random Sampling

Volunteer Bias- People who volunteer may feel more strongly than those who do not.

Selection Bias- If selection of participants are not random…the order of selection may bias results

Page 32: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

PROPORTIONAL

The sample must represent an accurate proportion of the variations in the larger population in order to be a true representative sample.

For Example: The sample should include the same percentage of males and females as what would be found in the larger population.

Page 33: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

SURVEY

Wording can change the results of a survey.

Q: Should cigarette ads and pornography be allowed on television? (allowed vs. forbidden)

Q: How many times in your life have you “cheated”?

(Have you ever? vs. How many? And cheated vs. lied or been dishonest)

33

Wording Effect

Page 34: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

SURVEY

A tendency to overestimate the extent to which others share our

beliefs and behaviors.

34

False Consensus Effect

Page 35: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH

Correlational Research Correlation and Causation Illusory Correlation Perceiving Order in Random

Events

35

Page 36: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

CORRELATION

Correlation Coefficient is a statistical measure of the relationship between two

variables.36

When one trait or behavior accompanies another, we say the two

correlate.

Correlation coefficient

Indicates directionof relationship

(positive or negative)

Indicates strengthof relationship(0.00 to 1.00)

r = 0.37+

Page 37: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

SCATTERPLOTS

37

Perfect positivecorrelation (+1.00)

Scatterplot is a graph comprised of points that are generated by values of two

variables. The slope of the points depicts the direction, while the amount of scatter depicts the strength of the relationship.

Page 38: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

SCATTERPLOTS

38

No relationship (0.00)Perfect negativecorrelation (-1.00)

The Scatterplot on the left shows a negative correlation, while the one on the right shows no

relationship between the two variables.

Page 39: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

DATA

39

Data showing height and temperament in people.

Page 40: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

SCATTERPLOT

40

The Scatterplot below shows the relationship between height and

temperament in people. There is a moderate positive correlation of +0.63.

Page 41: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

CORRELATION AND CAUSATION

41

or

Page 42: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

ILLUSORY CORRELATION

The perception of a relationship where no relationship actually exists. Parents conceive

children after adoption.

42

Confirming evidence

Disconfirming evidence

Do not

adopt

Disconfirming evidence

Confirming evidence

Adopt

Do not conceiveConceive

Michael N

ewm

an Jr./ Photo Edit

Page 43: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

ORDER IN RANDOM EVENTS

Given random data, we look for order and meaningful patterns.

43

Your chances of being dealt either of these hands is precisely the same: 1 in 2,598,960.

Page 44: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

ORDER IN RANDOM EVENTS

Given large numbers of random outcomes, a few are likely to express order.

44

Angelo and Maria Gallina won two California lottery games on the same

day.

Jerry Telfer/ San F

rancisco Chronicle

Page 45: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH

Experimental Research Exploring Cause and Effect Evaluating Therapies Independent and Dependent

Variables

Page 46: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

EXPERIMENTATION

Like other sciences, experimentation is the backbone of psychology research. The purpose of experimental research is to

isolate causes and their effects.

Exploring Cause and Effect

Page 47: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

EXPLORING CAUSE & EFFECT

Many factors influence our behavior. Experiments (1) manipulate factors that interest us, while other factors are kept

under (2) control.

Effects generated by factors manipulated by a researcher isolate cause and effect

relationships.

Page 48: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

MANIPULATED SOME FACTORS WHILE OTHERS ARE KEPT IN CONTROL….

I manipulated whether students had candy to eat while taking a quiz. These students were the experimental group

Students who did not receive a candy were the control group, because their testing condition was the same as it normally is.

Page 49: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

RANDOM ASSIGNMENT

Assigning participants to experimental (candy eating) and control (non-candy eating) conditions by

random assignment minimizes pre-existing differences between the two groups.

Students were randomly assigned to either the experimental or the control group based on the row in which they sat within the classroom. If a student

refused the lollipop it was given to the nearest student in the next row.

If I gave candy to the first 15 students who came to class or students in the front of the room, a pre-

existing difference may have accounted for a difference in test scores.

Page 50: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

INDEPENDENT VARIABLE

An Independent Variable is a factor manipulated by the experimenter. The effect of the independent variable is the

focus of the study. For example, when examining the effects of

candy on test scores, candy is the independent variable.

Page 51: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

DEPENDENT VARIABLE

A Dependent Variable is a factor that may change in response to an independent variable. In psychology, it is usually a

behavior or a mental process.

For example, in our study on the effect of candy on test scores, test scores are the

dependent variable. The score on the assessment is dependent on whether or not

a candy was eaten

Page 52: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

A SUMMARY OF STEPS DURING EXPERIMENTATION.

Random Assignment: Students are given lollipops by row

Condition Independent Variable

Dependent Variable

Experimental

Control

Scores from a 8 point

memory task

No sweet substance

made primarily of sugar

A sweet substance

made primarily of sugar

Scores from a 8 point

memory task

Page 53: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

EXPERIMENTER EFFECTS

Expectations can influence results!

My hypothesis was clearly written on the board when students were taking the test and eating candy. Their expectation that they would or would not perform well could have influenced your actual

performance.

Because of this, psychologists use single blind procedures. Where the participant is unaware of the

behavior being observed.

Page 54: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

SINGLE-BLIND PROCEDURE

In a single blind study, participants would not know whether they are in the experimental

or control group.

Psychologists may use a placebo to keep participants unaware of any differences in

their treatment.Placebo- an inactive substance or fake

treatment used as a control in an experiment or given by a practitioner to a patient

Page 55: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

DOUBLE-BLIND PROCEDUREParticipants are not the only people to bring expectations to the laboratory. Experimenter

Effects can have powerful results

In setting up the experiment and evaluating results, the participants and the experimenter’s

assistants conducting the experiment should both remain unaware of which group was the

experimental group and which was the control.

Think of the Russian scientists conducting the research on psychic ability.

Page 56: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical
Page 57: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

INTERPRETING RESULTS

If an experiment is repeated and consistently yields the same results, the finding can be deemed reliable.

However, the best interpretation of a finding does not emerge until the hypothesis is further tested in multiple ways.

So, after repeating my candy experiment several times…I may want to change the type of candy, assessment or student to see if that has an impact on my result

Page 58: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

THINKING CRITICALLY …

Statistical Reasoning Interpreting Results Describing Data Making Inferences

Page 59: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical
Page 60: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

DESCRIBING DATA

A meaningful description of data is important in research. Misrepresentation

may lead to incorrect conclusions. Statistical procedures analyze and

interpret data allowing us to see what the unaided eye misses.

Page 61: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCYA GOOD WAY TO SUMMARIZE DATA IS TO USE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDANCY

Mode: The most frequently occurring score in a distribution.

Mean: The arithmetic average of scores in a distribution obtained by adding the scores and then dividing by the number of scores that were added together.

Median: The middle score in a rank-ordered distribution.

Page 62: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCY

A Skewed Distribution

Page 63: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH METHODCANDY EXPERIMENT DATA COLLECTION

Candy Rows (Experimental Condition) 10 Students

2,5,5,5,6,7,8,8,8,8

Mean 6.2/10Median 6.5/10Mode 8/10

Non-candy Rows (Control Condition) 16 Students

3,4,4,4,5,5,6,6,6,6,6,6,7,7,8,8

Mean 5.3/16Median 6.5/16Mode 6/16

Page 64: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

FAQ

Q4. Why do psychologists study animals?

Ans: Studying animals gives us the understanding of many behaviors that may have common biology across animals and

humans.

D. Shapiro, © Wildlife Conservation Society

Page 65: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

FAQ

Q5. Is it ethical to experiment on animals?

Ans: Yes. To gain insights to devastating and fatal diseases. All researchers who deal with

animal research are required to follow ethical guidelines in caring for these animals.

Page 66: 1 Critical Thinking- the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons and evidence. Critical

FAQ

Q6. Is it ethical to experiment on people?

Ans: Yes. Experiments that do not involve any kind of physical or psychological harm beyond normal levels encountered in daily life may be

carried out.