Click here to load reader
Upload
tracey-dorsey
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
3 Analysis Individuals’ perceptions of vulnerability to effects of heat waves How perceptions may shape actions to reduce vulnerability Types of adjustments evident –reactive vs. anticipatory adaptation –short term vs. long-term adaptation –implications for adaptive capacity
Citation preview
1
Conceptual and practical barriers to adaptation
Dr. Johanna Wolf1*
Dr. Irene Lorenzoni1Dr. Roger Few2
1Tyndall Centre for Climate Change ResearchSchool of Environmental Sciences
2Overseas Development GroupSchool of Development Studies
University of East AngliaNorwich
UK*email [email protected]
2
Perceptions of vulnerability to heat wave effects
• Objective– To explore how perceptions of vulnerability affect
adaptation actions among vulnerable population– To explore barriers to adaptation arising from such
perceptions• Methods
– Interviews with elderly people age 75+ and ‘carers’ in summer 2007
• 57 interviews in Norwich, 44 in London• Stratified by IMD1-2 (bottom end) and IMD4-5 (top end of
socio-economic spectrum)– Qualitative analysis of interview data using
grounded theory
3
Analysis
• Individuals’ perceptions of vulnerability to effects of heat waves
• How perceptions may shape actions to reduce vulnerability
• Types of adjustments evident– reactive vs. anticipatory adaptation– short term vs. long-term adaptation– implications for adaptive capacity
4
Many elderly do not perceive themselves as vulnerable
• Do not perceive themselves as elderly• Do not acknowledge heat as a threat• Identify factors which contribute to
vulnerability, but do not perceive themselves as vulnerable
• Do not associate health effects of heat with themselves
Reproduces “not me-not here” perceptions of climate impacts
Barrier to adaptation
5
High vs. low self-efficacyHigh self efficacy:• Feel independent
and able to manage without help
• May refuse help offered
• Overestimate capacity to adjust
Perpetuate vulnerability
Unlikely to adjust
Low self efficacy:• Unable to take action
– Nothing can be done– Not sure what to do
• Distance from issue
Contributes to vulnerability
Reduces ability to adapt
6
Social networks do not necessarily reduce vulnerability
• Carers may not perceive cared-for to be at risk, despite identifying the elderly as more vulnerable
• Carers’ awareness of health effects of heat and coping strategies often very limited
• Unaware of how medical conditions can further exacerbate vulnerability
Rely on poor advice or cope without effective help
Leads to ‘hidden’ vulnerabilityBarrier to adaptation
7
Responses constitute reactive adaptation
• Primarily reactive responses to heat stress
• Very few cases of anticipatory responses• Almost no long-term adjustmentsProactive, long term adaptation does not
readily happenRaises questions about adaptive
capacity of this population group
8
In combination, these results imply…Barriers to adaptation exist at the level of
individuals• Conceptual: emerge from perceptions of self,
concepts of aging, vulnerability, ability to foresee outcomes
• Practical: social interactions may exacerbate vulnerability
Heat as a non-issue, high/low self efficacy, social networks, and evidence of ongoing reactive adjustments together suggest anticipatory, long-term adaptation is unlikely