Upload
aron-ford
View
225
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
3 Pre Scientific Management –The model for organization Roman Empire –The Feudal System
Citation preview
11
Chapter TwoChapter Two
Organizations Organizations Organization Theory and Organization Theory and
ApproachApproach
22
Evolution of Organization TheoryEvolution of Organization TheoryPeriod 1 : Pre Scientific Management (1880)Period 1 : Pre Scientific Management (1880)
Period 2 : Classical Management (1880-1930)Period 2 : Classical Management (1880-1930)
Scientific Scientific Classical Classical Management TheoryManagement Theory Organizational Theory Organizational Theory
Period 3 : Behavioral Management (1930-1950)Period 3 : Behavioral Management (1930-1950)
Management ScienceManagement Science System Aproach System Aproach
Contingency ManagementContingency Management (1950 to present)(1950 to present)
33
Evolution of Organization TheoryEvolution of Organization Theory
Pre Scientific ManagementPre Scientific Management– The model for organization Roman EmpireThe model for organization Roman Empire– The Feudal SystemThe Feudal System
44
Evolution of Organization TheoryEvolution of Organization Theory
Scientific Management TheoryScientific Management Theory– Frederick W. Tailor (1856-1915)Frederick W. Tailor (1856-1915)
All job can be observed and analyzedAll job can be observed and analyzedThe best person for the job can be trained.The best person for the job can be trained.One best way is followed by training people and One best way is followed by training people and paying them on an incentive basispaying them on an incentive basisPut manager in charge of planning, preparing and Put manager in charge of planning, preparing and inspecting work. The worker simply carries out the inspecting work. The worker simply carries out the manager direction.manager direction.
55
Evolution of Organization TheoryEvolution of Organization Theory
Classical Organizational TheoryClassical Organizational Theory– Henry Fayol (1841-1925)Henry Fayol (1841-1925)
Proposed fourteen principles of management such Proposed fourteen principles of management such as :as :
– Each subordinate receives orders from only one superior Each subordinate receives orders from only one superior (unity command)(unity command)
– Similar activities in organization should be grouped Similar activities in organization should be grouped together under one manager (unity direction)together under one manager (unity direction)
– These principles formed the foundation for modern These principles formed the foundation for modern management practice and organization design.management practice and organization design.
66
Evolution of Organization TheoryEvolution of Organization Theory
Behavioural Management TheoryBehavioural Management Theory– Elton Mayo (1880-1949)Elton Mayo (1880-1949)
His research showed that when special attention is His research showed that when special attention is given to workers by management, productivity is given to workers by management, productivity is likely to increase orlikely to increase orThe positive treatment of employees improved The positive treatment of employees improved their motivation and productivity (Hawthorne effect)their motivation and productivity (Hawthorne effect)
77
Evolution of Organization TheoryEvolution of Organization Theory
Behavioural Management TheoryBehavioural Management Theory– Douglas McGregor (1901-1964)Douglas McGregor (1901-1964)
Theory XTheory X– Most people must be controlled, directed and threatened Most people must be controlled, directed and threatened
with punishment to get them to do an adequate job.with punishment to get them to do an adequate job.
Theory YTheory Y– People are motivated best by satisfying their higher order People are motivated best by satisfying their higher order
needs for achievement.needs for achievement.
88
Evolution of Organization TheoryEvolution of Organization Theory
Management ScienceManagement Science– Management science or operation researchManagement science or operation research– It is an approach often used for problem It is an approach often used for problem
solvingsolving– Mathematical models and computers are Mathematical models and computers are
frequently used in the analysis of the problemfrequently used in the analysis of the problem
99
Evolution of Organization TheoryEvolution of Organization Theory
Systems approachSystems approach– Is a set of interralated and interdependent Is a set of interralated and interdependent
parts arranged in a manner that produces a parts arranged in a manner that produces a unified whole.unified whole.
– Two basic types of systems :Two basic types of systems :Closed systems : are influenced by and do not Closed systems : are influenced by and do not interact with their environmentinteract with their environmentOpen systems : are influenced by and do interact Open systems : are influenced by and do interact with their environmentwith their environment
1010
Transformation
Process
An Open SystemAn Open System
Environment
Raw MaterialsPeopleInformation resourcesFinancial resources
Input
BoundarySpanning
BoundarySpanning
Products andServices
Output
1111
Evolution of Organization TheoryEvolution of Organization Theory
Contingency Management TheoryContingency Management Theory– Attempts to integrate various existing Attempts to integrate various existing
management theories in order to find the best management theories in order to find the best approach for a particular situationapproach for a particular situation
ManagerManagerSub ordinateSub ordinateTaskTask SituationSituationOrganizationOrganizationEnvironmentEnvironmentTimingTiming
1212
Evolution of Organization TheoryEvolution of Organization Theory
Contingency Management TheoryContingency Management Theory– Contingency approach says that Contingency approach says that
organizations are different, face different organizations are different, face different situations, and require different ways of situations, and require different ways of managingmanaging
– Organization should design its structure to fit Organization should design its structure to fit its environment.its environment.
1313
Fit Between the Organization and Its Fit Between the Organization and Its EnvironmentEnvironment
1414
(a) Competitors, industry size and competitiveness, related issues(b) Suppliers, manufacturers, real estate, services(c) Labor market, employment agencies, universities, training schools, employees in other companies, unionization(d) Stock markets, banks, savings and loans, private investors(e) Customers, clients, potential users of products and services(f) Techniques of production, science, computers, information technology
(g) Recession, unemployment rate,inflation rate, rate of investment,
economics, growth(h) City, state, federal laws
and regulations, taxes,services, court system,
political processes(i) Age, values, beliefs,
education, religion,work ethic, consumer
and greenmovements
(j) Competition fromand acquisition by
foreign firms,entry into overseas
markets, foreign customs, regulations,
exchange rates
An Organization’s EnvironmentAn Organization’s Environment
(j)International
Sector
(d)Financial
ResourcesSector
(e)MarketSector
(f)Technolo
gySector
(g)EconomicConditions
Sector
(a)IndustrySector
(h)Government
Sector
(c)Human Resourc
esSector
(b)Raw
MaterialsSector
(i)Sociocultur
alSector
ORGANIZATION
DOMAIN
1515
The Competitive EnvironmentThe Competitive Environment
Information on Competitors
Competitive Barriers
Competitive Rivals
Competitor Analysis
Kinds of Markets
KeyConcepts
in theCompetitiveEnvironment
4-6
1616
The Economic EnvironmentThe Economic Environment
Interest Rates
Global Economy Rapid Change
KeyEconomic
Forces
4-7
1717
The Cultural and Social The Cultural and Social EnvironmentEnvironment
4-11
Cultural Trend: The Changing Roles of Women
TimePoverty
Economic Power
CareerOpportunity
1818
Simple + Stable = Low Uncertainty
1. Small number of external elements and elements are similar
2. Elements remain the same of change slowly
Examples: soft drink bottlers, beer distributors, container manufacturers, food processors
Simple + Unstable = High-Moderate Uncertainty
1. Small number of external elements and elements are similar
2. Elements change frequently and unpredictably
Examples: E-commerce, fashion clothing, music industry, toy manufacturers
Complex + Unstable = High Uncertainty
1. Large number of external elements and elements are dissimilar
2. Elements change frequently and unpredictably
Examples: Computer firms, aerospace firms, telecommunications, airlines
Complex + Stable = Low-Moderate Uncertainty
1. Large number of external elements and elements are dissimilar
2. Elements remain the same or change slowly
Examples: Universities and insurance
Framework for Assessing Framework for Assessing Environmental UncertaintyEnvironmental Uncertainty
UncertaintyENVIRONMENTALCHANGE
STABLE
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY
UNSTABLE
SIMPLE COMPLEX
1919
Mechanistic and Organic Mechanistic and Organic Organizational StructuresOrganizational Structures
Mechanistic structuresMechanistic structures: structures which : structures which are designed to induce (bring on) people are designed to induce (bring on) people to behave in predictable, accountable to behave in predictable, accountable wayswaysOrganic structuresOrganic structures: structures which : structures which promote flexibility, so people initiate promote flexibility, so people initiate change and can adapt quickly to changing change and can adapt quickly to changing conditionsconditions
2020
Figure : Mechanistic and Figure : Mechanistic and Organic StructuresOrganic Structures
2121
Figure Task and Role Figure Task and Role RelationshipsRelationships
2222
Lawrence & Lorsch: Differentiation, Lawrence & Lorsch: Differentiation, Integration, and the EnvironmentIntegration, and the Environment
Investigated how companies in different Investigated how companies in different industries differentiate and integrate their industries differentiate and integrate their structures to fit the environmentstructures to fit the environment
– Three industries that experienced different Three industries that experienced different levels of uncertainty: levels of uncertainty:
1.1. The plastics industryThe plastics industry2.2. The food-processing industryThe food-processing industry3.3. The container or can-manufacturing industryThe container or can-manufacturing industry
2323
Findings: Lawrence and Findings: Lawrence and LorschLorsch
When environment is perceived as more When environment is perceived as more unstable and uncertain:unstable and uncertain:– Effective organizations are less formalized, Effective organizations are less formalized,
more decentralized and rely more on mutual more decentralized and rely more on mutual adjustment.adjustment.
When environment is perceived as stable When environment is perceived as stable and certain:and certain:– Effective organizations have a more Effective organizations have a more
centralized, standardized, and formalized centralized, standardized, and formalized structure:structure:
2424
Uncertainty, Differentiation Uncertainty, Differentiation and Integrationand Integration
2525
Burns and StalkerBurns and Stalker
Also found that organizations need Also found that organizations need different kinds of structure to control their different kinds of structure to control their activities based on the environmentactivities based on the environment– Unstable and changing environmentUnstable and changing environment: Organic : Organic
structures are more effectivestructures are more effective– Stable environmentStable environment: Centralized, formalized : Centralized, formalized
and standardized characteristic of and standardized characteristic of mechanistic structures are more effectivemechanistic structures are more effective
2626
Figure Environmental Figure Environmental Uncertainty and StructureUncertainty and Structure