1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Steve Dierker Associate Laboratory Director for Photon Sciences Project Advisory Committee February 8-9, 2011 Photon Sciences

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

Steve DierkerAssociate Laboratory Director for Photon Sciences

Project Advisory CommitteeFebruary 8-9, 2011

Photon Sciences Portfolio & Future Planning


NSLS Facility

2.8 GeV300 mA

800 MeV1000 mA

• Operating since 1982• Continued good reliability (95+%)

Operating BeamlinesVUV-IR X-

ray TotalFacility 6 15 21PRT 5 33 38ALL 11 48 59


NSLS Continues to be Very Productive

•Accelerators are aging but continue to operate with high reliability•Operations funding $39M in FY10 but $36.5M in FY11 under CR•142 FTEs on operations funding, 20 more on other funds•~ 2200 users/year and more than 900 publications/year•Premier publications (impact factor > 6) represent ~25% of total

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

Pu

blic

atio

ns

Fiscal Year

Staff Pubs

User Pubs

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

# U

sers

Fiscal Year

NSLS Users by Field of Research

Chemical Sciences Materials SciencesLife Sciences Geosciences and EcologyApplied Science and Engineering Optical/Nuclear/General PhysicsUnknown


• Science Program Goals:1) Very fast ramp up of science program2) Continuous service to user community3) Dramatically advanced capabilities and high productivity•Transition to NSLS-II operations involves evolution from NSLS operation and NSLS-II construction to NSLS-II operation, all the while continually hosting a large user community and renewing the scientific facilities•Must develop a substantial number of beamlines and transition staff and users from NSLS ops to achieve maximum scientific productivity as soon as possible•Requires coordinated planning and an integrated staffing plan for all activities•Draft NSLS-II User Access Policy issued last March• Expect to finalize at upcoming April SAC meeting•Issued Beamline Development Policy and solicited proposals for NSLS-II beamlines last March• 2011 call will be issued this month

Science Capabilities at CD-4 and Beyond


Beamline Development Process

Letter of

Intent

Submitted by Proposal Team

BeamlineDevelopment

Proposal


BeamlineProject

Execution Plan

Submitted by Beamline Development Group

Developed by External Group

if Type II

Developed by NSLS-II if Type I

Declined Feedback to Proposal Team

Letter of

Intent

Submitted by Proposal Team

BeamlineDevelopment

Proposal


BeamlineProject

Execution Plan



if Type II



Letter of

IntentSubmitted by Proposal Team

BeamlineDevelopment

Proposal


BeamlineProject

Execution Plan



if Type II



The Letter of Intent (LOI) identifies the beamline Proposal Team that intends to submit a Beamline Development Proposal (BDP) and provides a brief description of the science program and type of beamline

The BDP describes the scientific programs that such a beamline would serve and the main technical requirements that the beamline must meet to enable those programs(10 pages)

The Beamline Project Execution Plan (BPEP) describes the membership of the Beamline Advisory Team (BAT), the plan for formation of the Beamline Development Group (BDG), the plan for managing and executing the design and construction of the beamline, the pre-conceptual technical design, the preliminary cost and schedule estimates, and a commitment for the necessary funding


Beamline Project Execution Plan

• Approval of a BDP authorizes development and submission of a BPEP• The BPEP presents the plans for beamline project execution, including the scientific need and

justification; project objectives and description; management systems; environment, safety, health, and security; resource planning; transition to operations; project controls (management, baseline, and change control); and reporting

• Upon approval of the BPEP, a Beamline Development Agreement will be executed between NSLS-II and the BDG that outlines the rights and obligations of the BDG and assigns a beamport and experimental floor space for use by the beamline

• Some of the required elements include:• Beamline Advisory Team membership• Staffing plan for Beamline Development Group• Management Plan• Pre-conceptual Design• Preliminary Cost and Schedule Estimate• Funding Commitment


2010 Call forBeamline Development Proposals

•Scope• Any area of science• Any beamline type – ID, BM, 3PW, IR• Independent of funding source or implementation approach (i.e., new, reused, who

builds – Type I: Photon Sciences, Type II: external group)•Science case and technical requirements•Schedule

• Issued on March 26• Beamline Development Informational Meeting held on April 14• Letters of Intent received on April 26• Beamline Development Proposals received on June 21• Reviewed by Science Advisory Committee & 7 Study Panels• Results announced Oct 4

•Future calls will be issued on an annual basis


Beamline Development WorkshopsUser community organized 13 workshops with hundreds of participants• High Pressure Science, April 29-30, 2010• Coherent Diffractive Imaging, May 17-18, 2010• Nano Electron Spectroscopy, May 24, 2010• Chemical, Biological, & Condensed Matter Studies Using Ultrafast Pulses,

May 27-28, 2010• Integrated In-situ and Resonant Hard X-ray Studies, May 27-28, 2010• X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy and Related Techniques, June 1, 2010• Time-resolved Full-field X-ray Microscopy at Nano & Micro Scales, June 2,

2010• X-ray Scattering for Biological Applications at NSLS-II, June 2, 2010• Soft Matter Science and Liquid Scattering, June 3-4, 2010• Full-field Imaging Beamline at NSLS-II, June 4, 2010• Hard Inelastic X-ray Scattering, June 9, 2010• Soft Inelastic X-ray Scattering, June 11, 2010• Time-resolved X-ray Diffraction & Spectroscopy in Extreme Conditions, June

15, 2010


Scientific Areas of Beamline Development Proposals

• 54 Beamline Development Proposals received by June 21, 2010

• 7 SAC Study Panels, consisting of 51 external scientists, were set up to meet at BNL and review these 54 proposals

SAC Study Panel Meeting Schedule:• Biological & Environmental Chemistry

Thursday-Friday, July 8-9, 2010• Materials Science

Monday-Tuesday, July 12-13, 2010• Advanced Eng. Materials Studies

Tuesday-Wednesday, July 13-14, 2010• Condensed Matter Physics

Monday-Tuesday, July 19-20, 2010• Structural Biology

Tuesday-Wednesday, July 20-21, 2010• Structural Chemistry & Catalysis

Wednesday-Thursday, July 21-22, 2010• Imaging & Microscopy

Thursday-Friday, July 29-30, 2010


Existing and New Scientific User Communities

• These 54 Beamline Development Proposals cover a broad range of science areas and scientific user communities, including both existing and potentially new user communities in each of the science areas

Proposal Team Members•668 Total•421 Unique•43% current NSLS users

Existing Program

New Program


Evaluation Criteria• Science Case: Does the research enabled by establishment of the proposed beamline have the potential to address important scientific and/or societal questions?

• User Demand: Is there evidence of significant interest, engagement, and support for the proposed beamline facility by the scientific community?

• Performance: Will the proposed beamline provide the performance necessary to fulfill its scientific mission, with characteristics well matched to the NSLS-II source?

• Technical Feasibility: Is achieving the proposed beamline capabilities technically feasible?• Quality of Proposers: Are the proposal team members experienced in the proposed field of research and technique and are they representative of the corresponding user community that would be served by the beamline?

• The Study Panels produced a Summary Assessment for each BDP containing specific comments on strengths and weaknesses and scores from 1 to 5 for each review criteria

Score Descriptor Scoring Guidelines1 Outstanding Exceptionally strong with negligible weaknesses2 Excellent Very strong with minor weaknesses that can be easily addressed3 Very Good Strong but at least 1 moderate weakness that would lessen impact4 Good Some strengths but at least 1 major weakness that severely limits impact5 Fair Very few strengths and major weaknesses that lead to very little impact


BDP Review & Outcome

• Review Process• SAC Study Panel evaluations of written proposals & oral presentations, based on:

– Science Case, User Demand, Performance, Feasibility, Quality of Proposal Team• SAC discussed all BDPs and sought a balanced overall assessment, based on:

– Study Panel reports– balance of techniques and science areas

• Outcome:• 31 Type I BDPs approved, 3 Type II BDPs approved, 20 Type I BDPs not approved

• “Approved” in “mission need / CD-0” sense; funding is not assured• Next Steps:• During September and October, we prepared preliminary cost estimates, with a common basis

of estimate, and defined initial and mature scope, for the approved Type I BDPs that were most promising for receiving near term funding

• In November, we discussed beamline recommendations with BES based on results from SAC review and preliminary cost estimates


34 Approved Beamline Development ProposalsAcronym Title Spokesperson Type

4DE 4-Dimensional Studies in Extreme Environments Donald J. Weidner, Stony Brook U. 1ABS A Highly Automated Instrument for Static X-ray Scattering Measurements of Biological Molecules in Solution Lin Yang, BNL 1AIM Advanced Infrared Microspectroscopy Lisa Miller, BNL 1AMX Flexible Access Macromolecular Crystallography at an Undulator Beamline Dieter Schneider, BNL 1BMM Hard X-ray Abs. Spectro. & Diffraction - Beamline for Materials Measurements Daniel Fischer, NIST 2CDI Coherent X-ray Diffraction Ian Robinson, U. College London 1CMS Complex Materials Scattering Kevin Yager, BNL 1ESM Electron Spectromicroscopy for Fundamental Studies of the Physics & Chemistry of Materials Elio Vescovo, BNL 1FIS Frontier Synchrotron Infrared Spectro. Beamline Under Extreme Conditions Zhenxian Liu, Carnegie Institute 1FMX Frontier Macromolecular Crystallography at an Undulator Beamline Robert Sweet, BNL 1FXI A Superconducting Wiggler Long Beamline for Full-field Imaging Jake Socha, Virginia Tech 1HIX Hard X-ray - Inelastic X-ray Scattering Young-June Kim, U. of Toronto 1IRI Full-field Infrared Spectroscopic Imaging Lisa Miller, BNL 1ISR Integrated In-situ & Resonant Hard X-ray Studies Karl Ludwig, Boston U. 1ISS Inner-shell Spectroscopy Bruce Ravel, NIST 1IXD Powder Diffraction Beamline for In-situ Studies of Structural & Chemical Transformations Jianming Bai, U. of Tennessee 1LIX A High-brightness X-ray Scattering Instrument for Biological Applications Lin Yang, BNL 1

MET Infrared & THz Beamline for Magnetospectro., Ellips. & Dynamical Studies Larry Carr, BNL 1MID Dedicated Beamline for X-ray Instrumentation Development Jeff Keister, BNL 1MPP Materials Physics & Processing Jean Jordan-Sweet, IBM 1MXD Multiscale X-ray Diffraction Kenneth Evans-Lutterodt, BNL 1NYX NYSBC Microdiffraction Beamline Wayne Hendrickson, Columbia U. 2OFT At-wavelength Metrology & In-situ Figuring Konstantine Kaznatcheev, BNL 1QAS Beamline for In-situ Studies of Chemical Transformations by Combined, Synchronous, “Quick” X-ray Absorption & Scat Measurements Anatoly Frenkel, Yeshiva U. 1SIX Soft Inelastic X-ray Scattering Kevin Smith, Boston U. 1SM3 Correlated Single-crystal Spectroscopy & Macromolecular Crystallography Allen M. Orville, BNL 1SMI Soft-Matter Interfaces Ben Ocko, BNL 1SSS Soft X-Ray Spectroscopy & Scattering Joseph Dvorak, BNL 1SST Soft & Tender X-ray Spectroscopy & Microscopy Daniel Fischer, NIST 2TEC Time-resolved X-ray Diffraction & Spectroscopy Under Extreme Conditions Alexander Goncharov, Carnegie Inst. 1TES Tender Energy X-ray Spectroscopy Paul Northrup, Stony Brook U. 1XAS X-ray Abs. Spectroscopy for Biological, Environmental & Energy Sciences Mark Chance, Case Cent. for Syn. Bio. 1XFM X-ray Fluorescence Microprobe Antonio Lanzirotti, U. of Chicago 1XFP X-ray Footprinting Mark Chance, Case Cent. for Syn. Bio. 1


Beamline Distributions(Project + Approved Beamlines)

Science Source


Science Villages•Science Village concept has been widely advocated by scientific

community and we strongly support this concept• Idea is to co-locate beamlines likely to be utilized by a specific

scientific community, after satisfying physical constraints on beamline locations

•These co-located beamlines, along with nearby Laboratory Office Buildings (LOB), will serve as the foundation of “Science Villages”

•LOB in a Village may house ancillary instruments to provide off-line experimental capabilities for the community, as well as serve as a primary meeting place for colleagues & co-workers

•Staff and users at co-located beamlines in a Village may share beamline instrumentation and learn from each other’s experience and expertise


Possible Science Villages at NSLS-II•Possible Science Villages aligned with LOBs:

• Condensed matter & materials physics (CMP)• Materials science & engineering (MSE)• Environmental & heterogeneous materials science (EHM)• Biology and soft matter science (BSM)• Chemical science and catalysis (CSC)

CMP

MSE

EHMBSM

CSC

43 beamlines•9 project (CSX, XPD, SRX dual)•34 approved24 Open Ports•6 Insertion Device straights•18 BM/3PW ports

Village Beamlines OpenCMP 11 4MSE 7 6EHM 6 6BSM 13 3CSC 6 5

•Distribution if all project and approved beamlines were built:


NSLS & NSLS-II Beamline Portfolios

41 = 6 Project + SRX-2 + 31 Type I + 3 Type II

Experimental Technique NSLS BLs* NSLS-II BLsSPECTROSCOPY 22 11 Low-Energy Spectroscopy 6 3 Soft X-ray Spectroscopy 3 1 Hard X-ray Spectroscopy 9 5 Optics/Calibration/Metrology 4 2SCATTERING 31 22 Hard X-ray Diffraction 11 6 Macromol. Crystallography 10 5 Hard X-ray Scattering 7 8 Soft X-ray Scattering 3 3Imaging 9 8 Hard X-ray Imaging 5 6 Soft X-ray Imaging 2 0 Infrared Imaging 2 2TOTAL 62 41*Includes 3 Diagnostics/Instrumentation beamlines that provide only limited user support due to insufficient staffing


Transferring NSLS SpectroscopyBeamlines & Programs to NSLS-II

Low-Energy SpectroscopyNSLS Beamline Operator NSLS-IIU2A Facility FISU4IR Facility (D&I) METU5UA Facility ESMU11 PRT: BNL Biology

U12IR Facility METU13UB PRT: BNL CMPMSD, Boston U, Columbia U ESM

Soft X-ray SpectroscopyNSLS Beamline Operator NSLS-IIU7A PRT: NIST, DOW, BNL Chemistry SSTU12A PRT: ORNL SSSX24A PRT: NIST SST


Hard X-ray SpectroscopyNSLS Beamline Operator NSLS-IIX3B PRT: CWRU XAS

X10C PRT: Exxon QASX11A PRT: NRL (and others) QASX11B PRT: NRL (and others) QASX15B PRT: SBU, 9 others TESX18A Facility ISSX18B Facility ISSX19A Facility TESX23A2 PRT: NIST BMM

Optics/Calibration/MetrologyNSLS Beamline Operator NSLS-IIU3C PRT: LLNL, LANL, NST, SNL X8A PRT: LLNL, LANL, NST, SNL

X24C PRT: NRL MIDX27B PRT: BNL NNS MID

Transferring NSLS SpectroscopyBeamlines & Programs to NSLS-II


Hard X-ray DiffractionNSLS Beamline Operator NSLS-IIX7B PRT: BNL Chemistry, GE IXDX10B PRT: Exxon MPPX13B Facility MXDX14A PRT: ONRL, UT, NJIT IXDX16C PRT: SBU IXDX17B1 Facility XPDX17B2 Facility 4DEX17B3 Facility 4DEX17C Facility 4DEX20A PRT: IBM MPPX20C PRT: IBM MPP

Transferring NSLS ScatteringBeamlines & Programs to NSLS-II


Macromolecular CrystallographyNSLS Beamline Operator NSLS-IIX3A PRT: CWRU, Rockefeller U AMXX4A PRT: NYSBC NYXX4C PRT: NYSBC NYXX6A Facility AMXX12B PRT: BNL Biology FMXX12C PRT: BNL Biology FMXX25 Facility FMX

X26C PRT: BNL Biology, CSHL, SBU SM3X28C PRT: CWRU XFPX29A PRT: BNL Biology, CWRU AMX



Hard X-ray ScatteringNSLS Beamline Operator NSLS-IIX6B Facility CMSX9 Facility SMI

X10A PRT: Exxon CMSX21 Facility ISR

X22B PRT: BNL CMPMSD, BNL CFN SMIX22C PRT: BNL CMPMSD, MIT, Rutgers U ISRX27C PRT: SBU, Exxon CMS

Soft X-ray ScatteringNSLS Beamline Operator NSLS-IIU4B Facility SSSX1B PRT: U of Illinois, TJNAF, Boston U SIXX13A Facility (D&I) CSX



Transferring NSLS ImagingBeamlines & Programs to NSLS-II

Hard X-ray ImagingNSLS Beamline Operator NSLS-IIX2B Exxon FXIX15A FacilityX19C PRT: SBUX26A PRT: CARS, BNL Env. Sci. XFMX27A Facility XFM

Soft X-ray ImagingNSLS Beamline Operator NSLS-IIX1A1 PRT: BNL CFN & CMPMSD, SUNY Plattsburgh X1A2 Facility (D&I)

Infrared ImagingNSLS Beamline Operator NSLS-IIU2B Facility AIMU10B Facility IRI


Funding Opportunities for Beamline Development Beyond the Project

• DOE-BES• “NEXT” MIE (“NSLS-II Experimental Tools”)

• 5-6 ID beamlines• Preliminary Cost Range: $50M to $90M

• NEXT-II MIE: 5-6 ID beamlines to follow NEXT• NxtGen: BM/3PW beamlines w/ early ops funding

• NIH• Committed $45M to fund construction of 4 ID beamlines

• $12M awarded to NSLS-II in FY10 (ARRA) to design & construct undulators• $33M in President’s FY11 budget request for beamlines

• DOE-BER• Holding workshop on May 9-11 on the impact of new and planned DOE national user facilities

in the field of structural biology• Five DOE Labs invited: ORNL for SNS, SLAC for LCLS and LCLS-II, LBNL for soft-x-ray FEL, ANL

for APS upgrade, and BNL for NSLS-II• NSF

• Held discussions with program managers – ongoing effort

CD-0 for NEXT approved May 2010


NEXT Beamlines

Based on peer review of 2010 Beamline Development Proposals by Science Advisory Committee and discussions with DOE-BES, the following six beamlines have been selected for NEXT MIE project:

Acronym TitleSMI Soft Matter InterfacesESM Photoemission-Microscopy Facility for Fundamental

Studies of the Physics and Chemistry of MaterialsSIX Soft Inelastic X-ray ScatteringISS Inner Shell Spectroscopy ISR Integrated In-Situ and Resonant X-Ray StudiesFXI Full-field X-ray Imaging from Microns to Nanometers

Documents

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Steve Dierker Associate Laboratory Director for Photon Sciences Project Advisory Committee February 8-9, 2011 Photon Sciences