21
1 Bird rarity in terra- Bird rarity in terra- firme forest: reality or firme forest: reality or imperfect detection? imperfect detection? Marconi Campos Cerqueira Marconi Campos Cerqueira Gonçalo Ferraz, Claudeir Vargas, Gonçalo Ferraz, Claudeir Vargas, Christian Borges, Thiago Vernucci, Angela Christian Borges, Thiago Vernucci, Angela Midori, Marcelo Santos, Monica Ribas, Midori, Marcelo Santos, Monica Ribas, Mario Conh-Haft Mario Conh-Haft Fotos:Erik Johns

1 Bird rarity in terra-firme forest: reality or imperfect detection? Marconi Campos Cerqueira Gonçalo Ferraz, Claudeir Vargas, Christian Borges, Thiago

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

11

Bird rarity in terra-firme forest: Bird rarity in terra-firme forest: reality or imperfect detection?reality or imperfect detection?

Marconi Campos CerqueiraMarconi Campos CerqueiraGonçalo Ferraz, Claudeir Vargas, Christian Borges, Thiago Gonçalo Ferraz, Claudeir Vargas, Christian Borges, Thiago Vernucci, Angela Midori, Marcelo Santos, Monica Ribas, Vernucci, Angela Midori, Marcelo Santos, Monica Ribas,

Mario Conh-HaftMario Conh-Haft

Fotos:Erik Johnson

22

“Rare species play such a central role in conservation biology that Rare species play such a central role in conservation biology that the discipline has been defined as the science of scarcity and the discipline has been defined as the science of scarcity and diversity “Soulé, 1986diversity “Soulé, 1986

Hypothesis:Hypothesis: - The ornithologist`s perception of commonness and rarity - The ornithologist`s perception of commonness and rarity

reflect the truth about forest patch occupancy by birds. reflect the truth about forest patch occupancy by birds.

Conservation implications: Conservation implications: - some common species may be mistakenly classified as - some common species may be mistakenly classified as

rarerare..

33

Rarity as occupancy :Rarity as occupancy :

- Proportion of occupied sites, or occupancy, instead of abundance.Proportion of occupied sites, or occupancy, instead of abundance.- Positive interspecific correlation between occupancy and abundance – not only Positive interspecific correlation between occupancy and abundance – not only

obvious but well documented (Gaston and Blackburn 1999)obvious but well documented (Gaston and Blackburn 1999)

- Locally abundant species tend to occupy more places than rare ones.Locally abundant species tend to occupy more places than rare ones.

--

44

Fiuí fiu fiitri

55

???? ??

Detectio

n is not perf

ect

66

Trogons

Puffbirds Jacamars

Ovenbirds

Woodcreepers

77

Antthrushes

Wrens

Vireos

Antwrens

Antshrikes

88

Study areaStudy area

99

2 weeks of survey:

1st week – Ten trained researches make 3-minute point counts in ten different trails simultaneously.

660 point counts660 point counts

1980 min of observation1980 min of observation

330 km collective walk330 km collective walk

2nd week- playback of 16 species` songs in one more visit per point by one observer.

Methodology

1010

Improve and measure observer skillsImprove and measure observer skills

Prior training in the fieldPrior training in the field Memory training with ‘electronic flashcards’Memory training with ‘electronic flashcards’ Memory retention test -> observer scoreMemory retention test -> observer score Observer score as covariate of detection Observer score as covariate of detection

1111

AnalysisAnalysis

Parameter estimation(Occupancy and detection)Parameter estimation(Occupancy and detection)

Maximum likelihoodMaximum likelihood

Hypothesis testingHypothesis testing

Models selection AICModels selection AIC the model with lowest AIC value provides the most the model with lowest AIC value provides the most

parsimonious and best approximation of information parsimonious and best approximation of information contained in the datacontained in the data 1

1(Burnham e Anderson 1998)

1212

Detection probabilitiesDetection probabilities

Example: Example: Bucco tamatiaBucco tamatia

Model Δ AIC

Ψ(.) p(playback+time) 0

Ψ(.) p(playback+time+score) 2

Ψ(.) p(playback) 31.2

Ψ(.) p(playback+score) 33.2

Ψ(.) p(time) 37.2

Ψ(.) p(time+score) 37.69

Ψ(.) p(.) 51.17

Ψ(.) p(score) 51.22 p(playback+time)

Naive estimate = 0,25

Estimated occupancy = 0,38 ± 0.09

1313

Time of the day Time of the day ×× detection (given presence) detection (given presence)

Observer score Observer score ×× detection (given presence) detection (given presence)

Playback Playback ×× detection (given presence)detection (given presence)

Occupancy for 20 species – final estimateOccupancy for 20 species – final estimate

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

sp1 sp2

Species

Occupancy

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

sp1 sp2

Species

Occupancy

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

sp1 sp2

Species

Occupancy

So… are the birders getting it?So… are the birders getting it?

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

1 2

Species

Occupancy

So… are the birders getting it?So… are the birders getting it?

1919

Rarity team

Sure they are

getting it!

2020

ApoioApoio

2121

Obrigado,Obrigado,thanks!thanks!

[email protected]