Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Background error covariance with balance constraints for aerosol species and 1
applications in variational data assimilation 2
3
4
Zengliang Zang1, Zilong Hao
1, Yi Li
1, Xiaobin Pan
1, Wei You
1, Zhijin Li
2 and Dan Chen
3 5
6
Units: 1 College of Meteorology and Oceanography, PLA University of Science and Technology, 7
Nanjing 211101, China; 8
2Joint Institute For Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los 9
Angeles, California90095, USA; 10
3National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA 11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
June 8, 2016 21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Corresponding author: 28
Prof. Zengliang Zang 29
E-mail: [email protected] 30
Telephone: 86-025-80830400 31
Fax: 86-025-80830400 32
Address: No.60, Shuanglong Street, Nanjing 211101, China 33
Abstract 34
Balance constraints are important for background error covariance (BEC) in data assimilation 35
to spread information between different variables and produce balance analysis fields. Using 36
statistical regression, we develop a balance constraint for the BEC of aerosol variables and apply it 37
to a three-dimensional variational data assimilation system in the WRF/Chem model. One-month 38
forecasts from the WRF/Chem model are employed for BEC statistics. The cross-correlations 39
between the different species are generally high. The largest correlation occurs between elemental 40
carbon and organic carbon with as large as 0.9. After using the balance constraints, the 41
correlations between the unbalanced variables reduce to less than 0.2. A set of data assimilation 42
and forecasting experiments is performed. In these experiments, surface PM2.5 concentrations and 43
speciated concentrations along aircraft flight tracks are assimilated. The analysis increments with 44
the balance constraints show spatial distributions more complex than those without the balance 45
constraints, which is a consequence of the spreading of observation information across variables 46
due to the balance constraints. The forecast skills with the balance constraints show substantial 47
and durable improvements from the 2nd
hour to the 16th
hour compared with the forecast skills 48
without the balance constraints. The results suggest that the developed balance constraints are 49
important for the aerosol assimilation and forecasting. 50
Keyword: aerosol species, WRF/Chem, data assimilation, balance constraint, background error 51
covariance 52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
1. Introduction 61
Aerosol data assimilation in chemical transport models has received an increasing amount of 62
attention in recent years as a basic methodology for improving aerosol analysis and forecasting. In 63
a data assimilation system, the background error covariance (BEC) plays a crucial role in the 64
success of an assimilation process. The BEC and the observation error determine analysis 65
increments from the assimilation process (Derber and Bouttier 1999, Chen et al., 2013). 66
However, accurate estimation of the BEC remains difficult due to a lack of information about 67
the true atmospheric states and also due to computational requirement arising from the large 68
dimension of the BEC (typically ). For a variational data assimilation system, a few 69
methods have been developed to estimate and simplify the expression of the BEC, such as the 70
analysis of innovations, the NMC (National Meteorological Center) and the ensemble-based 71
(Monte Carlo) methods. The NMC method is extensively used in operational atmospheric and 72
meteorology-chemistry data assimilation systems. It assumes that the forecast errors are 73
approximated by differences between pairs of forecasts that are valid at the same time (Parrish and 74
Derber, 1992). Pagowski et al. (2010) estimated the BEC of PM2.5 (particles having an 75
aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 µm) by calculating the differences between the forecasts of 24 76
and 48 h, and used the estimated BEC in a Grid-point Statistical Interpolation (GSI) system (Wu et 77
al., 2002). Benedetti et al. (2007) estimated the BEC of the sum of the mixing ratios of all aerosol 78
species for an operational analysis and forecast systems at ECMWF (The European Centre for 79
Medium-Range Weather Forecasts). The BEC with multiple species and size bins of aerosols have 80
been calculated and employed in data assimilation. Liu et al. (2011) estimated the BEC with 14 81
aerosol species in the Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport scheme of the Weather 82
Research and Forecasting/Chemistry (WRF/Chem) model and applied it to the GSI system. 83
Schwartz et al. (2012) increased the number of the species to 15 based on the study of Liu et al. 84
(2011). Li et al. (2013) estimated the BEC for five species derived from the Model for Simulation 85
Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC) scheme. 86
One important role that the BEC plays in meteorological data assimilation is to spread 87
information between different variables to produce balanced analysis fields, which employ 88
balance constraints to convert original variables into new independent variables. Balance 89
constraints have been employed in atmospheric and oceanic data assimilation, such as geostrophic 90
balance or temperature-salinity balance (Bannister, 2008a, 2008b). To incorporate balance 91
constraints, the model variables are usually transformed to balanced and unbalanced parts. The 92
unbalanced parts as control variables are can be assumed independent, and the balanced parts are 93
constrained by balance constraints (Derber and Bouttier, 1999). Instead of using an empirical 94
function as a balance constraint, balance constraints are also derived using regression techniques 95
(Ricci and Weaver, 2005). Although distinct empirical relations between some variables (such as 96
temperature and humidity) may not exist, the regression equation can also be estimated as balance 97
constraints (Chen et al., 2013). 98
In current aerosol variational data assimilation with multiple variables, balance constraints are 99
not yet incorporated in the BEC. The state variables are assumed to be independent variables 100
without cross-correlation. However, the aerosol species are frequently highly correlated due to 101
their common emission sources and diffusion processes. For example, the correlations in terms of 102
the R-square between elemental carbon and black carbon exceed 0.6 in many locations across Asia 103
and the South Pacific in both urban and suburban locations (Salako et al., 2012), and the 104
correlations between different size bins, such as PM2.5 and PM10-2.5 (the diameter of particles being 105
between 2.5 and 10 µm), are also generally significant (Sun et al., 2003; Geller et al., 2004). Thus, 106
the cross-correlations between different species or size bins are necessary to produce balanced 107
analysis fields. Cross-correlations spread the observation information from one variable to other 108
variables, which can produce more balanced initial fields. For the data assimilation of the 109
ensemble Kalman filter method, the BEC with balance constraints is assured (Pagowski et al., 110
2012; Schwartz et al., 2014), although the balance may break down because of localization. 111
Recently, several studies have suggested that the BEC with balanced cross-correlation should 112
be introduced into aerosol variational data assimilation (Kahnert, 2008; Liu et al., 2011; Li et al., 113
2013; Saide et al., 2013). Kahnert (2008) exhibited cross-correlations of the seventeen aerosol 114
variables from Multiple-scale Atmospheric Transport and Chemistry (MATCH) Model. He found 115
that the statistical cross-correlations between aerosol components are primarily influenced by the 116
interrelations between emissions and by interrelations due to chemical reactions to a much lesser 117
degree. Saide et al., (2012; 2013) incorporated the capacity to add cross-correlations between 118
aerosol size bins in GSI for assimilating observations of aerosol optical depth (AOD) data. The 119
cross-correlations between the two connecting size bins for each species were considered using 120
recursive filters while, the cross-correlation is not considered for the other size bins that are not 121
connecting. 122
In this paper, we explore incorporating cross-correlations between different species in BEC 123
using balance constraints. The balance constraints are established using statistical regression. We 124
apply the BEC with the balance constraints to a data assimilation and forecasting system with the 125
MOSAIC scheme in WRF/Chem. The MOSAIC scheme includes a large number of variables with 126
eight species, and flexibility of eight or four size bins. The scheme of four size bins is used in our 127
studies. The four bins are located between 0.039–0.1 μm, 0.1–1.0 μm, 1.0–2.5 μm, and 2.5–10 μm, 128
and the total mass of the first three bins are PM2.5. A 3DVAR system for the MOSAIC (4-bin) 129
scheme has been developed by Li et al. (2013). For comparisons, we employ this 3DVAR system 130
with the same model configurations as employed by Li et al. (2013). The data assimilation and 131
forecasting experiments are performed with a focus on assessing the impact of cross-correlations 132
of the BEC on analyses and forecasts. 133
The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the 3DVAR system and the formulation 134
of the BEC. Section 3 describes the WRF/Chem configuration and estimates the correlations 135
among the emissions. The statistical characteristics of the BEC, including the regression 136
coefficient of the cross-correlation, are discussed in Section 4. Using the BEC, experiments of 137
assimilating surface PM2.5 observations and aircraft observations are discussed in Section 5. 138
Shortcomings, conclusions and future perspectives are presented in Section 6. 139
2. Data assimilation system and BEC 140
In this section, we present a formulation of the BEC with cross-correlation between different 141
species using a regression technique. Then, the cost function with the new BEC is derived and the 142
calculating factorization of the BEC is described. 143
The control variables of the data assimilation are obtained from the MOSAIC (4-bin) aerosol 144
scheme in the WRF/Chem model (Zaveri et al., 2008). The MOSAIC scheme includes eight 145
aerosol species, that is, elemental carbon or black carbon (EC/BC), organic carbon (OC), nitrate 146
(NO3), sulfate (SO4), chloride (Cl), sodium (Na), ammonium (NH4), and other inorganic mass 147
(OIN). Each species is separated into four bins with different sizes: 0.039–0.1 μm, 0.1–1.0 μm, 148
1.0–2.5 μm and 2.5–10 μm. The scheme involves 32 aerosol variables with eight species and four 149
size bins. These variables cannot be directly introduced as control variables in an assimilation 150
system in consideration of computational efficiency. The number of variables must be decreased 151
prior to assimilation. Li et al. (2013) have lumped these variables into five species as control 152
variables in the 3DVAR system. The five species consist of EC, OC, NO3, SO4 and OTR. Here, 153
OTR is the sum of Cl, Na, NH4 and OIN. Note that the data assimilation system aims to assimilate 154
the observation of PM2.5; only the first three of four size bins are utilized to lump as one control 155
variable for each species. 156
For a 3DVAR system, the cost function ( ), which measures the distance of the state vector to the 157
background and observations, can be written as follows: 158
. (1) 159
Here, is the vector of the state variables, including EC, OC, NO3, SO4 and OTR; is the 160
background vector of these five species, which are generated by the MOSAIC scheme; is the 161
observation vector; is the observation operator that maps the model space to the observation 162
space and is assumed to be linear here; is the observation error covariance associated with ; 163
and is the background error covariance associated with . Eq. (1) is usually written in the 164
incremental form 165
, (2) 166
where ) is the incremental state variable. The observation innovation vector is 167
known as . The minimization solution is the analysis increment , and the final 168
analysis is . This analysis is statistically optimal as a minimum error variance 169
estimate (e.g., Jazwinski, 1970; Cohn, 1997). 170
In Eq. (1) or Eq. (2), is a , where is the number of model grid points, 171
and is the number of state variables. is a symmetric matrix with a dimension of . 172
For a high-resolution model, the number of vector is on the order of . Therefore, the 173
number of elements in B is approximately . With this dimension, B cannot be explicitly 174
manipulated. To pursue simplifications of B, we employ the following factorization 175
, (3) 176
where and are the standard deviation matrix and the correlation matrix, respectively. 177
and can be described and separately prescribed after the factorization. is a diagonal matrix 178
whose elements include the standard deviation of all state variables in the three-dimensional grids. 179
To reduce the computational cost, we use the average value of standard deviations that are at the 180
same level. Thus, the standard deviation is simplified with vertical levels. is a symmetric 181
matrix, having the form 182
, (4) 183
where , , , and at diagonal locations are the background error 184
auto-correlation matrices that are associated with each species. They represent the correlation 185
among pairs of grid points for one species. Other submatrices represent the correlations between 186
different species, known as cross-correlations. For example, represents the cross-correlations 187
between EC and OC, and
. In Li et al. (2013), these cross-correlations were 188
disregarded, that is, the five species are considered independently and is thus a block diagonal 189
matrix. 190
In this study, the cross-correlations between different species are considered by introducing 191
control variable transforms (Derber and Bouttier, 1999; Barker, 2004; Huang, 2009). We divide 192
the model aerosol variables into balanced components ( ) and unbalanced components ( ): 193
. (5) 194
Note the EC does not need to be divided. There is not unbalanced component for EC that is 195
similar to the variable of vorticity in the data assimilation of ECMWF (Derber and Bouttier, 1999), 196
or the variable of stream function in the data assimilation of MM5 (Barker, 2004). The 197
transformation from unbalanced variables ( ) to full variables ( ) by the balance operator 198
is given by 199
. (6) 200
Eq. (6) can be written as 201
(7) 202
where is the submatrix of , which represents the statistical regression coefficients between 203
the variables and (Chen et al., 2013). Note that is a diagonal matrix with the dimension of 204
model grid points. Each model grid point has a regression coefficient. For convenience, we 205
assumed that the elements of is a constant value for all grid points, which are denoted as 206
and are calculated by linear regression with all grid points. For example, can be obtained 207
from the regression equation of OC and as 208
, (8) 209
where is the residual. and can be estimated from the forecast differences of 24 h 210
forecasts and 48 h forecasts, similar to the statistics of the BEC. Eq. (8) contains the slope but no 211
intercept. The intercept is nearly zero because and represent forecast differences that 212
can be considered to be zero mean values. After obtaining , the balanced part (e.g., the value 213
of the regression prediction) of OC can be obtained by 214
. (9) 215
Where represents the predicted value of Eq. (8), which is equal to the balanced part ( ). 216
Remove the from the full variables to obtain the unbalanced part ( ), that is, in Eq. 217
(8). Thus, the calculation of can be written as 218
. (10) 219
Here, and EC are employed as predictors in the next regression equation to obtain 220
. Then, we can obtain the unbalanced parts of the remaining variables, which are defined as 221
follows: 222
(11) 223
(12) 224
(13) 225
The coefficient of determination ( ) can be employed to measure the fit of these regressions. It 226
can be expressed as 227
, (14) 228
where SSR and SST are the regression sum of squares and the sum of squares for total, 229
respectively. 230
These unbalanced parts can be considered to be independent because they are residual and 231
random. denotes the unbalanced variables of the BEC and can be factorized as 232
, (15) 233
where and are the standard deviation matrix and the correlation matrix, respectively. 234
should be a block diagonal without cross-correlations as follows: 235
. (16) 236
According the definition of the BEC, 237
. (17) 238
And can be written as 239
. (18) 240
Using Eq. (6), Eq. (17) and Eq. (18), the relationship between and is 241
. (19) 242
and
are defined as the square root of and the square root of , respectively. Their 243
transformation is 244
. (20) 245
Using Eq. (15), Eq. (20) can be written as follows: 246
. (21) 247
Generally, a transformed cost function of Eq. (2) is expressed as a function of a preconditioned 248
state variable: 249
. (22) 250
Here,
. Using Eq. (21), Eq. (22) can be written as 251
. (23) 252
Eq. (23) is the last form of the cost function with the cross-correlation of . 253
According to Li et al. (2013), the correlation matrix of the unbalanced parts ( ) is factorized as 254
(24) 255
Here, denotes the Kronecker product, and , and represent the correlation 256
matrices between gridpoints in the direction, the direction, and the direction, respectively, 257
with the sizes , , and , respectively. Here, , and represent the 258
numbers of grid points in the direction, direction, and direction, respectively. This 259
factorization can decrease the size of the dimension of . Another desirable property of Eq. (24) 260
is 261
(25) 262
and are expressed by Gaussian functions, and is directly computed from the proxy 263
data. They will be discussed in Sec 4.2. 264
3. WRF/Chem configuration and cross-correlations of emission species 265
In this section, we describe the configuration of WRF/Chem, whose forecasting products will 266
be employed in the following BEC statistics and data assimilation experiments. In addition, the 267
cross-correlations of emission species from the WRF/Chem emission data are investigated to 268
understand the cross-correlation between different species of the BEC. 269
3.1 WRF/Chem configuration 270
WRF/Chem (V3.5.1) is employed in our study. This is a fully coupled online model with a 271
regional meteorological model that is coupled to aerosol and chemistry models (Grell et al., 2005). 272
The model domain with three spatial domains is shown in Figure 1. The horizontal grid spacing 273
for these three domains are 36 km (80×60 points), 12 km (97×97 points), and 4 km (144×96 274
points), respectively. The outer domain spans southern California and the innermost domain 275
encompasses Los Angeles. All domains have 31 vertical levels with the top at 50 hPa. The vertical 276
grid is stretched to place the highest resolution in the lower troposphere. The discussion of the 277
BEC and the emissions presented in this paper will be confined to the innermost domain. The 278
initial meteorology conditions for WRF/Chem are prepared using the North American Regional 279
Reanalysis (NARR) (Mesinger et al. 2006). The meteorology boundary conditions and sea surface 280
temperatures are updated at each initialization. For the forecast running, the initial meteorological 281
conditions are obtained from the NARR data. The initial aerosol conditions are obtained from the 282
former forecast. The emissions are derived from the National Emission Inventory 2005 (NEI’05) 283
for both aerosols and trace gases (Guenther et al., 2006). For more details, the readers are referred 284
to Li et al. (2013). 285
286
Figure 1. Geographical display of the three-nested model domains. The innermost domain covers 287
the Los Angeles basin; the black point denotes the location of Los Angeles. 288
3.2 Cross-correlations of emission species 289
The emission source is necessary for running the WRF/Chem model. It is an important factor 290
for the distribution of the aerosol forecasts. The analysis of the correlations among the emission 291
species can help us to understand the BEC statistics. The emission species is derived from the 292
emission file that is produced by the NEI’05 data for each model domain. Only the emission data 293
for the innermost domain is used to calculate the correlation among the emission species. The 294
emission file contains 37 variables, including gas species and aerosol species. An aerosol species 295
also comprises a nuclei mode and accumulation model species (Peckam et al., 2013). From these 296
aerosol emission species, five lumped aerosol species are calculated, which is consistent with the 297
variables in the data assimilation. These five lumped species are E_EC (sum of the nuclei mode 298
and the accumulation mode of elemental carbon PM2.5), E_ORG (sum of the nuclei mode and the 299
accumulation mode of organic PM2.5), E_NO3 (sum of the nuclei mode and the accumulation 300
mode of nitrate PM2.5), E_SO4 (sum of the nuclei mode and the accumulation mode of sulfate 301
PM2.5), and E_PM25 (sum of the nuclei mode and the accumulation mode of unspeciated primary 302
PM2.5). 303
Figure 2 shows the cross-correlations of the five lumped aerosol emission species. All 304
cross-correlations exceed 0.5. This result reveals that the emission species are correlated, which 305
may be attributed to the common emission sources and diffusion processes that are controlled by 306
the same atmospheric circulation. The most significant cross-correlation is between E_EC and 307
E_ORG with a value of approximately 0.8. This high correlation demonstrates that the emission 308
distributions of these two species are very similar. Their emissions are primary in urban and 309
suburban areas with small emissions in rural areas and along roadways (not shown). As shown in 310
Fig. 2, the lowest cross-correlation is between E_ORG and E_SO4; the latter emissions are 311
primary in the urban and suburban areas with few emissions in rural areas and roadways (not 312
shown). 313
314
Figure 2. Cross-correlations between emission species of E_EC, E_ORG, E_NO3, E_SO4 and 315
E_PM25. The emission species data are derived from the NEI’05 emissions set for the innermost 316
domain of the WRF/Chem model 317
318
4 Balance constraints and BEC statistics 319
E_EC E_ORG E_NO3 E_SO4 E_PM25
E_EC
E_ORG
E_NO3
E_SO4
E_PM25
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
With the configuration of the WRF/Chem model described in Section 3.1, forecasts for one 320
month (from 00UTC of May 15 to 00UTC of June 14, 2010) were performed for the balance 321
constraints and the BEC statistics. Forecast differences between 24 h forecasts and 48 h forecasts 322
are available at 00UTC. Thirty forecast differences are employed as inputs in the NMC method. 323
For this method, 30 forecast differences are sufficient; however, a longer time series may be more 324
beneficial for the BEC statistics (Parrish and Derber, 1992). 325
4.1 Balance regression statistics 326
Using the 30 forecast differences between 24 h and 48 h forecasts, we can obtain , , 327
and . The size of these variables is , where is the number of 328
model grid points. We put these data into Eqs. (6-13) to calculate the regression coefficients of 329
and the unbalanced parts of the variables. Note the process of calculation should be step by step, 330
since the latter equation will use the unbalanced parts of former equations. Table 1 shows the 331
regression coefficients whose column and row are consistent with in Eq. (7). The last column 332
in Tab. 1 is the coefficient of determination ( ) of the regression equations. For the regression 333
equation of OC, the regression coefficient is 0.90 and the coefficient of determination of Eq. (7) is 334
0.86, which indicates that EC and OC are highly correlated and their mass concentration scales are 335
approximate. Their correlation is similar to the correlation of the stream function and velocity 336
potential; thus, we set them as the first and second variables in the regression statistics. For the 337
regression equation of , the regression coefficients of EC and are 4.01 and 3.76, 338
respectively, because the mass concentration scale of exceeds the mass concentration scales 339
of EC and . The coefficient of determination is only 0.32, which indicates that the 340
correlations between and EC and between and are weak. This result reveals that 341
the forecast errors of differ from the forecast errors of EC and . A possible reason is 342
that is the secondary particle that is primarily derived from the transformation of , but 343
EC and are derived from direct emissions. Similar to , is also primarily derived 344
from the transformation of and the coefficient of determination for is also low. For the 345
last variable OTR, the maximum coefficient of determination is 0.96 because OTR includes some 346
different compositions that are correlated with the first four variables. 347
Table 1 Regression coefficients of balance operator and the coefficient of determination 348
(regression coefficients correspond to in Eq. (7)) 349
species regression coefficient ( ) coefficient of determination ( )
EC 1 /
OC 0.90 1 0.86
NO3 4.01 3.76 1 0.32
SO4 1.35 -0.21 -3.15 1 0.48
OTR 2.93 2.35 0.28 0.60 1 0.96
350
Figure 3 shows the cross-correlations of the five full variables and the unbalanced variables. In 351
Fig. 3a, the cross-correlations of the full variables exceed 0.3 and most of them exceed 0.5. In Fig. 352
3b, however, the cross-correlations of the unbalanced variables are less than 0.2. Some of the 353
cross-correlations are close to zero, which indicates that these unbalanced variables are 354
approximatively independent and can be employed as control variables in the data assimilation 355
system. 356
(a) full variables (b) unbalanced variables
Figure 3. Cross-correlations between the five variables of the BEC. These variables are (a) full 357
variables and (b) unbalanced variables of EC, OC, , and OTR. 358
359
4.2 BEC statistics 360
Using the original full variables and the unbalanced variables obtained by the regression 361
equations, the BEC statistics are obtained. Figure 4 shows the vertical profiles of the standard 362
deviations of the original and the unbalanced . In Fig. 4a, the original standard deviation of 363
is the largest value, whereas the smallest value is OC, whose profile is close to the profile of 364
EC. All profiles show a significant decrease at approximately 800 m because the aerosol 365
particulates are usually limited under the boundary level. In Fig. 4b, all standard deviations 366
decrease in different degree, with the exception of EC, which remains as the control variable in the 367
unbalanced BEC statistics. Note that the standard deviation of decreases by approximately 368
80% compared with , which decreases by approximately 10%. This result is attributed to the 369
small coefficient of determination for the regression of (in Tab. 1), which indicates that a 370
small portion of can be predicted by the regression and a large portion is an unbalanced 371
component. In contrast with , a small portion of OTR is the unbalanced component. 372
(a) full variables (b) unbalanced variables
Figure 4. Vertical profiles of the standard deviation of the variables. (a) full variables and (b) 373
unbalanced variables 374
375
For the correlation matrix of and , they are factorized as three independent 376
one-dimensional correlation matrices in Eq. (24). The horizontal correlation or is 377
approximately expressed by a Gaussian function. The correlation between two points and 378
can be written as
, where is the horizontal correlation scale and is a constant value 379
for and , which are considered to be isotropic (Li et al., 2013). This scale can be estimated 380
by the curve of the horizontal correlations with distances. Figure 5 shows the curves of the 381
horizontal correlations for the five control variables. For the full variables (Fig. 5a), the sharpest 382
decrease in the curves is observed for and the slowest decrease in the curves is observed 383
for . We assume that the decline curve is according to the Gaussian function. Then the 384
intersection of the decline curve and the line of
can be approximately as the value 385
of horizontal correlation scale. The horizontal correlation scales of EC, OC, , and OTR 386
are 25 km, 27 km, 20 km, 30 km and 28 km, respectively. For the unbalanced variables (Fig. 5b), 387
their curves are closer than the curves of the full variables. The correlation scales of EC, , 388
, and are 25 km, 23 km, 24 km, 28 km and 25 km, respectively. These results 389
suggest that the unbalanced variables are expressed by some common factors such as EC, 390
and , in the regression equations of Eqs. (10-13), which produces consistent horizontal 391
correlation scales. 392
(a) full variables (b) unbalanced variables
Figure 5. Same as Figure 4, with the exception of the horizontal auto-correlation curves of the 393
variables. The horizontal thin line is the reference line of
for determining the 394
horizontal correlation scales. 395
396
For the vertical correlation between and , they are directly estimated using the 397
forecasting differences in the data assimilation system, but not estimated from a approximately 398
alternative function. Because it is only an matrix. Figure 6 shows the vertical correlation 399
matrices and for the full variables (left column) and the unbalanced variables (right 400
column), respectively. A common feature of both the full variables and the unbalanced variables is 401
the significant correlation between the levels of the boundary layer height, which is consistent 402
with the profile of the standard deviation in Fig. 4. Some weak adjustments to the correlations 403
between the full and unbalanced variables are made. For example, the correlation of is 404
stronger than the correlation of between the boundary layers. Similar with the analysis of 405
horizontal correlation scale, the vertical correlation scale of is larger than the vertical 406
correlation scale of . Conversely, the vertical correlation scale of is smaller than the 407
vertical correlation scale of OTR. These results demonstrate that the vertical correlations for the 408
unbalanced variables are more consistent than the vertical correlations of the full variables, which 409
is similar to the adjustments to the horizontal correlation scale. Note that the differences of vertical 410
correlation are slight, compared with the difference of horizontal. The main reason is that the 411
vertical correlations are generally affected by the atmospheric boundary layer height. Thus, all 412
vertical correlation decreases rapidly for the levels above the boundary layer height. 413
Height (m)
Heig
ht (m
)
OC
50 100 200 500 1000 2000 500010000
50
100
200
500
1000
2000
5000
10000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Height (m)
Heig
ht (m
)
OC
50 100 200 500 1000 2000 500010000
50
100
200
500
1000
2000
5000
10000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1u
Height (m)
)m(
th
gie
H
NO3
50 100 200 500 1000 2000 500010000
50
100
200
500
1000
2000
5000
10000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Height (m)
)m(
th
gie
H
NO3
50 100 200 500 1000 2000 500010000
50
100
200
500
1000
2000
5000
10000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1u
Figure 6. Vertical correlations of the five variables of the BEC. The left column represents the full 414
variables, and the right column represents the unbalanced variables. 415
416
5. Application to data assimilation and prediction 417
To exhibit the effect of the balance constraint of the BEC, the data assimilation experiments 418
and 24-h forecasts for nine cases are run using WRF/Chem model. The surface PM2.5 and 419
aircraft-speciated observations are assimilated using different BEC, and the evaluations are 420
presented for the data assimilation and subsequent forecasts. Three basic statistical measures 421
including mean bias (BIAS), root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (CORR) 422
are utilized for the evaluations. 423
5.1 Observation data and experiment scheme 424
Two types of observation data are employed in our experiments. The first type of observation 425
data consists of hourly surface PM2.5 concentrations from the California Air Resources Board 426
(ARB). There are 42 surface PM2.5 monitoring sites existed in the innermost domain of the 427
Height (m)
)m(
th
gie
H
SO4
50 100 200 500 1000 2000 500010000
50
100
200
500
1000
2000
5000
10000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Height (m)
)m(
th
gie
H
SO4
50 100 200 500 1000 2000 500010000
50
100
200
500
1000
2000
5000
10000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1u
Height (m)
Heig
ht (m
)
OTR
50 100 200 500 1000 2000 500010000
50
100
200
500
1000
2000
5000
10000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Height (m)
Heig
ht (m
)
OTR
50 100 200 500 1000 2000 500010000
50
100
200
500
1000
2000
5000
10000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1u
WRF/Chem model (Fig. 7). The second type of observation data is the speciated concentration 428
along the aircraft flight track. The aircraft observations were investigated from the California 429
Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field campaign in 2010. Nine 430
flights data around Los Angeles from 15 May to14 June, 2010 are selected as the cases of data 431
assimilation. Table 2 shows the start time and end time of each flight. The species of the aircraft 432
observations include OC, NO3, SO4 and NH4. Note that NH4 is not a control variable; thus, the 433
aircraft observation of NH4 is disregarded in the data assimilation. Because the particle size of the 434
aircraft observations is less than 1.0 μm, some adjustments to the flight observations are made 435
according to the ratios between the concentration under 2.5 μm and the concentration under 1.0 436
μm for each species using model products. With the ratios multiplied by the aircraft observed 437
concentrations, the speciated concentrations under 2.5 μm can be obtained. 438
439
Table 2 The periods of flight during CalNex 2010 and the initial time of assimilation 440
Number of
cases
Start time of flight End time of flight Initial time of assimilation
1 18:00 UTC, May 16 01:42 UTC, May 17 00:00 UTC, May 17
2 17:28 UTC, May 19 00:10 UTC, May 20 18:00 UTC, May 19
3 17:28 UTC, May 21 00:10 UTC, May 21 18:00 UTC, May 21
4 23:08 UTC, May 24 05:23 UTC, May 25 00:00 UTC, May 25
5 01:59 UTC, May 30 07:45 UTC, May 30 06:00 UTC, May 30
6 05:00 UTC, May 31 10:54 UTC, May 31 06:00 UTC, May 31
7 07:59 UTC, June 2 14:09 UTC, June 2 12:00 UTC, June 2
8 07:59 UTC, June 3 14:041 UTC, June 3 12:00 UTC, June 3
9 17:56 UTC, June 14 23:35 UTC, June 14 18:00 UTC, June 14
441
442
Figure 7. The topography of the innermost domain and the locations of surface monitoring stations 443
(black dots). The red square is the location of Los Angeles 444
445
446
(a) 00:00 UTC±1.5 h, May 17 (b) 18:00 UTC±1.5 h, May 19 447
448
(c) 18:00 UTC±1.5 h, May 21 (d) 00:00 UTC±1.5 h, May 25 449
450
(e) 06:00 UTC±1.5 h, May 30 (f) 06:00 UTC±1.5 h, May 31 451
36N
35N
34N
33N
121W 120W 119W 118W 117W 116W
(m)
36N
35N
34N
33N
121W 120W 119W 118W 117W 116W 115W
(m)
36N
35N
34N
33N
121W 120W 119W 118W 117W 116W 115W
(m)
36N
35N
34N
33N
121W 120W 119W 118W 117W 116W 115W
(m)
36N
35N
34N
33N
121W 120W 119W 118W 117W 116W 115W
(m)
36N
35N
34N
33N
121W 120W 119W 118W 117W 116W 115W
(m)
36N
35N
34N
33N
121W 120W 119W 118W 117W 116W 115W
(m)
452
(g) 12:00 UTC±1.5 h, Jun 02 (h) 12:00 UTC±1.5 h, Jun 03 453
454
(i) 18:00 UTC±1.5 h, Jun 14 455
Figure 8. Aircraft flight tracks during the time window of data assimilation for nine cases. The 456
color of the track indicates the aircraft height. 457
458 The initial time of data assimilation cases are designed according to the period of flights, 459
showed in Table 2. The time window of assimilation for the flight data is ±1.5h, though some 460
flight times do not completely cover the time windows. Figure 8 shows the aircraft tracks during 461
the time window of data assimilation. It is obvious that the aircarft data on May 21, May 25 and 462
June 14 are relative few as the tracks are almost outside of the study domain. For the surface data, 463
it is only the observations at the initial time are assimilated. For each case, three parallel 464
experiments are performed. The first experiment is the control experiment without aerosol data 465
assimilation, which is frequently known as a free run and denoted as Control. The second 466
experiment is a data assimilation experiment that assimilates surface PM2.5 and aircraft 467
observations using the full variables without balance constraints; it is denoted as DA-full. The 468
third experiment is also a data assimilation experiment that also assimilates surface PM2.5 and 469
aircraft observations, but employs the unbalanced variables as control variables conducted by the 470
balanced constraint; it is denoted as DA-balance. The backgrounds for DA-full and DA-balance 471
are the forecasting results from the previous runs without DA. These previous forecasting results 472
36N
35N
34N
33N
121W 120W 119W 118W 117W 116W 115W
(m)
36N
35N
34N
33N
121W 120W 119W 118W 117W 116W 115W
(m)
36N
35N
34N
33N
121W 120W 119W 118W 117W 116W 115W
(m)
have been obtained when we run the model for the BEC statistics. The observation error is the half 473
of standard deviation of the original background variable, and a vertical profile of observation 474
errors is applied with the average profile of standard deviation of the background variable. In each 475
experiment, a 24-h forecasting is run using the WRF/Chem model with the same configuration 476
described in Section 3.1, and the case on June 3, 2010 is presented in detail as an example. 477
5.2 Increments of data assimilation 478
Figure 9 shows the horizontal increments of EC, OC, NO3, SO4 and OTR at the first model 479
level for the DA-full (left column) and DA-balance experiments (right column) of the case on 480
June 3, 2010. In the DA-full experiment, the increment of EC and OTR (Fig. 9a and 9i) are similar. 481
They are obtained from the surface PM2.5 observations because no direct aircraft observations 482
correspond to these two variables. In the DA-balance experiment, significant adjustments are 483
made to the increments of EC (Fig. 9b) under the action of the balance constraints. The 484
observations of OC affect greatly the increments of EC for thee high cross-correlation between EC 485
and OC. Thus the increments of EC are similar with the increments of OC. Similarly, significant 486
adjustments are made to the increment of OTR (Fig. 9j), though there are not the species 487
observation of OTR. There are also some slight adjustments for the increments of OC, NO3 and 488
SO4 for the crossing spread among species. 489
Figure 10 shows the vertical increments along 35.0 N for the DA-full and DA-balance 490
experiments. Similar to Fig. 9, the increments of EC and OTR (Fig. 10a and 10i) spread upward 491
from the surface in the DA-full experiment, which are obtained from the surface PM2.5 492
observation. In the DA-balance, the increments of EC and OTR (Fig. 10b and 10j) exhibit 493
observation information from the aircraft height at approximately 500 m, and the value of the 494
increments show significant increases. The distributions of the increments for these five variables 495
in the DA-balance (Fig. 10, right column) generally tend to coincide compared with the 496
distributions of the increments in the DA-full (Fig. 10, left column). The results of the DA-balance 497
are reasonable due to the influence of each other across the balance constraints. 498
(a) EC in the DA-full (b) EC in the DA-balance
(c) OC in the DA-full (d) OC in the DA-balance
(e) NO3 in the DA-full (f) NO3 in the DA-balance
(g) SO4 in the DA-full (h) SO4 in the DA-balance
(i) OTR in the DA-full (j) OTR in the DA-balance
Figure 9. Surface distributions of increments of the five variables of EC, OC, NO3, SO4 and OTR 499
at 12:00 UTC on June 3, 2010. The left column and right column are from DA-full and 500
DA-balance, respectively. 501
502
(a) EC in the DA-full (b) EC in the DA-balance
(c) OC in the DA-full (d) OC in the DA-balance
(e) NO3 in the DA-full (f) NO3 in the DA-balance
(g) SO4 in the DA-full (h) SO4 in the DA-balance
(i) OTR in the DA-full (j) OTR in the DA-balance
Figure 10. Same as Figure 9, with the exception of the vertical sections along 35 N. 503
504 5.3 Evaluation of data assimilation and forecasts 505
Figure 11 shows the scatter plots of the initial model fields versus the surface observation for all 506
nine cases. In Fig. 11a, the simulated concentrations of the Control experiment display a 507
significant underestimation with a BIAS of -3.66µg/m3. The mean concentration of Control is 508
10.90 µg/m3, about 25.1% lower than observed mean concentrations (14.56 µg/m
3). In the DA-full 509
and DA-balance experiments, there are remarkable increases for the simulated concentrations, and 510
the BIASs reduce to as small as -1.21 and -0.94 µg/m3. The RMSE is 9.53 µg/m
3 in the Control 511
experiment. The RMSE reduces to 4.82 and 4.48 µg/m3 in the DA-full and DA-balance 512
experiment, respectively. There are also significant improvements for the CORR in the DA-full 513
and DA-balance experiments, compared with the Control experiment. Furthermore, these three 514
statistical measures of the DA-balance experiments show some slight improvement, compared 515
with that of the DA-full experiments. The result demonstrates that more observation information 516
spread by balance constraints can improve assimilation performance. 517
518
(a) Control 519
520
(b) DA-full 521
522
(c) DA-balance 523
Figure 11. Scatter plots of observed concentrations of PM2.5 versus simulated PM2.5 concentrations 524
of the experiments of (a) Control, (b) DA-full, and (c) DA-balance for all nine cases. 525
526
To evaluate the effects of the data assimilation, the CORR, RMSE and BIAS during the forecast 527
time are calculated for each case, and their averaged results are showed in Figure 12. The CORRs 528
of the DA-balance and DA-full experiments are very close (Fig. 12a). But, the difference increase 529
0 20 40 600
10
20
30
40
50
60
RMSE=9.53
CORR=0.38
BIAS=-3.66
DA
-contr
ol
Observation
0 20 40 600
10
20
30
40
50
60
RMSE=4.82
CORR=0.85
BIAS=-1.21
DA
-full
Observation
0 20 40 600
10
20
30
40
50
60
RMSE=4.48
CORR=0.87
BIAS=-0.94
DA
-bala
nce
Observation
after the first hour with a higher CORR in the DA-balance experiment. The CORR of the 530
DA-balance experiment is substantially higher than that of the DA-full experiment from the 2nd
531
hour to the 16th
hour. Similar improvements for the RMSE and the BIAS of the DA-balance 532
experiment are observed in Fig. 12b and Fig. 12c, respectively. The improvement for the BIAS in 533
the DA-balance experiment is the most significant among these three statistical measures. The 534
peak value of the improvement for the BIAS (Fig 12c) is at the 4th
hour, and the improvement is 535
distinct until the end of forecasts. These improvements indicate that the balance constraint is 536
positive for the subsequent forecasts, which derives from the balanced initial distribution among 537
species. 538
(a) CORR
(b) RMSE
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Forecast duration (h)
CO
RR
Control
DA-full
DA-balance
0 4 8 12 16 20 244
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Forecast duration (h)
RM
SE
Control
DA-full
DA-balance
(c) BIAS
Figure 12. The averaged (a) Correlations, (b) root-mean-square errors (RMSE in µg/m3) and (c) 539
mean bias (BIAS in µg/m3) of the PM2.5 concentration forecasts against observations as a function 540
of forecast duration. 541
542
6. Summary and discussion 543
We examined the BEC in a 3DVAR system, which uses five control variables (EC, OC, NO3, 544
SO4 and OTR) that are derived from the MOSAIC aerosol scheme in the WRF/Chem model. 545
Based on the NMC method, differences within a month-long period between 24- and 48-h 546
forecasts that are valid at the same time were employed in the estimation and analyses of the BEC. 547
The background errors of these five control variables are highly correlated. Especially between EC 548
and OC, their correlation is as large as 0.9. 549
A set of balance constraints was developed using a regression technique and incorporated in 550
the BEC to account for the large cross correlations. We employ the the balance constraint to 551
seperate the original full variables into balanced and unbalanced parts. The regression technique is 552
used to express the balanced parts by the unbalanced parts. These unbalanced parts can be 553
assumed independent. Then, the unbalanced parts are employed as control variables in the BEC 554
statics. Accordingly, the standard deviations of these unbalanced variables are less than the 555
standard deviations of the original variables. The horizontal correlation scales of unbalanced 556
variables are closer than that of full variables on the effect of the balance constraints. And the 557
vertical correlations of unbalanced variables show similar trend. 558
To evaluate the impact of the balance constraints on the analyses and forecasts, three groups of 559
experiments, including a control experiment without data assimilation and two data assimilation 560
0 4 8 12 16 20 24-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
Forecast duration (h)
BIA
S
Control
DA-full
DA-balance
experiments with and without balance constraints (DA-full and DA-balance), were performed. In 561
the data assimilation experiments, the observations of surface PM2.5 concentration and 562
aircraft-speciated concentration of OC, NO3 and SO4 were assimilated. The observations of these 563
three variables can spread to the two remaining variables in the increments of the DA-balance, 564
which results in a more complex distribution. The evaluations of CORR, RMSE and BIAS for the 565
initial analysis fields show more improvement in the DA-balance experiments, compared with the 566
DA-full experiments. Though, these improvement are some slight. An important reason is that the 567
surface PM2.5 observations are independent from the aircraft observations. If we evaluate the 568
analysis fields by the species observation of aircraft, there may be more significant improvements 569
in the DA-balance experiments. 570
While the improvements increase after the first forecasting hour in the DA-balance 571
experiments, compared with forecasts of the DA-full experiments. The improvements persist to 572
the end of forecasts, and are substantial from the 2nd
hour to the 16th
hour (Fig. 12). These results 573
suggested that the balance constraints can serve an import role for continually improving the skill 574
of sequent forecasts. Note that some aircraft data are relative few, and some flight tracks are not 575
around Los Angeles in some cases (Fig. 8). If there are more aircraft observations, the 576
improvements of the DA-balance experiments should be more significant and durable. 577
The developed method for incorporating balance constraints in aerosol data assimilation can 578
be employed in other areas or other applications for different aerosol models. For the aerosol 579
variables in different models, some cross-correlations between different species or size bins 580
should exist because their common emissions and diffusion processes are controlled by the same 581
atmospheric circulation. Although these cross-correlations may be stronger than the 582
cross-correlations of atmospheric or oceanic model variables, theoretic balance constraints, such 583
as geostrophic balance or temperature-salinity balance, do not exist. We expected to discover a 584
universal balance constraint that can describe the physical or chemical balanced relationship of 585
aerosol variables, and utilize it in the data assimilation system. In addition, we expected to expand 586
the balance constraint to include gaseous pollutants, such as nitrite (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), 587
and (carbon monoxide) CO. These gaseous pollutants are correlated with some aerosol species, 588
such as NO3, SO4 and EC, which can improve the data assimilation analysis fields of aerosols by 589
http://dict.cn/sulfur%20dioxide
assimilating these gaseous observations. The assimilation of aerosol observations may improve the 590
analysis fields of gaseous pollutants. 591
592
Code availablity 593
This data assimilation system is established by ourself. The code of this system can be obtained on 594
request from the first author ([email protected]). 595
596
Acknowledgements 597
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41275128). 598
We gratefully thank the California Air Resources Board (http://www.arb.ca.gov/homepage.htm) 599
and NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Chemical Sciences Division 600
(http://esrl.noaa.gov/csd/groups/csd7/measurements/2010calnex/), for providing the download of 601
surface and aircraft aerosol observations. 602
603
References 604
Bannister, R.N., 2008a. A review of forecast error covariance statistics in atmospheric variational 605
data assimilation. I: Characteristics and measurements of forecast error covariances. Quart. J. Roy. 606
Meteor. Soc., 134, 1951–1970. 607
Bannister, R.N., 2008b. A review of forecast error covariance statistics in atmospheric variational 608
data assimilation. II: Modelling the forecast error covariance statistics. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 609
134, 1971–1996. 610
Barker, D.M., Huang, W., Guo, Y.R, Xiao, Q.N., 2004. A Three-Dimensional (3DVAR) data 611
assimilation system for use with MM5: implementation and initial results. Mon. Weather Rev. 132, 612
897–914. 613
Benedetti, A., Fisher, M., 2007. Background error statistics for aerosols. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. 614
Soc., 133, 391–405. 615
Chen, Y., Rizvi, S., Huang, X., Min, J., Zhang, X., 2013. Balance characteristics of multivariate 616
background error covariances and their impact on analyses and forecasts in tropical and Arctic 617
regions. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 121, 79–98. 618
Cohn, S.E., 1997: Estimation theory for data assimilation problems: Basic conceptual framework 619
mailto:[email protected]://www.arb.ca.gov/homepage.htmhttp://esrl.noaa.gov/csd/groups/csd7/measurements/2010calnex/
and some open questions. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 75, 257–288. 620
Derber, J., Bouttier, F., 1999. A reformulation of the background error covariance in the ECMWF 621
global data assimilation system. Tellus, 51, 195–221. 622
Geller, M. D., Fine, P. M., and Sioutas, C., 2004. The relationship between real-time and 623
time-integrated coarse (2.5–10m), intermodal (1–2.5m), and fine (
Pagowski, M., Grell, G. A., 2012. Experiments with the assimilation of fine aerosols using an 650
ensemble Kalman filter, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D21302, doi:10.1029/2012JD018333. 651
Pagowski, M., Grell, G.A., McKeen, S.A., Peckham, S.E., Devenyi, D., 2010. Three-dimensional 652
variational data assimilation of ozone and fine particulate matter observations: Some results using 653
the Weather Research and Forecasting–Chemistry model and Grid-point Statistical Interpolation. 654
Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 136, 2013–2024, doi:10.1002/qj.700. 655
Parrish, D.F., Derber, J.C., 1992. The national meteorological center spectral statistical 656
interpolation analysis. Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 1747–1763. 657
Ricci, S., Weaver, A.T., 2005. Incorporating State-Dependent Temperature–Salinity Constraints in 658
the Background Error Covariance of Variational Ocean Data Assimilation. Mon. Weather Rev., 659
133, 317–338. 660
Saide, P.E., Carmichael, G.R., Spak, S.N., Minnis, P., Ayers, J.K., 2012. Improving aerosol 661
distributions below clouds by assimilating satellite-retrieved cloud droplet number. P. Natl. Acad. 662
Sci. USA, 109, 11939–11943, doi:10.1073/pnas.1205877109. 663
Saide, P.E., Carmichael, G.R., Liu, Z., Schwartz, C.S., Lin, H.C., Da Silva, A.M., Hyer, E., 2013. 664
Aerosol optical depth assimilation for a size-resolved sectional model: impacts of observationally 665
constrained, multi-wavelength and fine mode retrievals on regional scale forecasts. Atmos. Chem. 666
Phys., 13, 10425–10444, doi:10.5194/acp-13-10425-2013. 667
Salako, G.O., Hopke, P.K., Cohen, D.D., Begum, B.A., Biswas, S.K., Pandit, G.G., Chung, Y.S., 668
Rahman, S.A., Hamzah, M.S., Davy, P., Markwitz, A., Shagjjamba, D., Lodoysamba, S., 669
Wimolwattanapun, W., Bunprapob, S., 2012. Exploring the Variation between EC and BC in a 670
Variety of Locations. Aerosol Air Qual. Res, 12, 1–7. 671
Wu, W.S., Purser, R.J., Parrish, D.F., 2002. Three-dimensional variational analysis with spatially 672
inhomogeneous covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2905-2916 673
Schwartz, C.S., Liu, Z., Lin, H.-C., McKeen, S.A., 2012. Simultaneous three-dimensional 674
variational assimilation of surface fine particulate matter and MODIS aerosol optical depth. J. 675
Geophys. Res., 117, D13202, doi:10.1029/2011JD017383. 676
Schwartz, C. S., Liu, Z., Lin, H.-C., Cetola, J. D., 2014, Assimilating aerosol observations with a 677
“hybrid” variational-ensemble data assimilation system, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 4043–4069, 678
doi:10.1002/ 2013JD020937. 679
Sun C.-H.., Lin Y.-C., Wang C.-S., 2003. 7. Relationships among Particle Fractions of Urban and 680
Non-urban Aerosols. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 3(1), 7-15. 681
Zaveri, R.A., Easter, R.C., Fast, J.D., Peters. L K., 2008. Model for Simulating Aerosol 682
Interactions and Chemistry(MOSAIC). J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13204, 683
doi:10.1029/2007JD008782. 684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
Table 1 Regression coefficients of balance operator and the coefficient of determination 711
(regression coefficients correspond to in Eq. (7)) 712
species regression coefficient ( )
coefficient of
determination
( )
EC 1 /
OC 0.90 1 0.86
NO3 4.01 3.76 1 0.32
SO4 1.35 -0.21 -3.15 1 0.48
OTR 2.93 2.35 0.28 0.60 1 0.96
713
714
715
716
Table 2 The periods of flight during CalNex 2010 and the initial time of assimilation 717
Number of
cases
Start time of flight End time of flight Initial time of assimilation
1 18:00 UTC, May 16 01:42 UTC, May 17 00:00 UTC, May 17
2 17:28 UTC, May 19 00:10 UTC, May 20 18:00 UTC, May 19
3 17:28 UTC, May 21 00:10 UTC, May 21 18:00 UTC, May 21
4 23:08 UTC, May 24 05:23 UTC, May 25 00:00 UTC, May 25
5 01:59 UTC, May 30 07:45 UTC, May 30 06:00 UTC, May 30
6 05:00 UTC, May 31 10:54 UTC, May 31 06:00 UTC, May 31
7 07:59 UTC, June 2 14:09 UTC, June 2 12:00 UTC, June 2
8 07:59 UTC, June 3 14:041 UTC, June 3 12:00 UTC, June 3
9 17:56 UTC, June 14 23:35 UTC, June 14 18:00 UTC, June 14
718
719
720
721
722
Figure 1 Geographical display of the three-nested model domains. The innermost domain covers 723
the Los Angeles basin; the black point denotes the location of Los Angeles. 724
725
Figure 2 Cross-correlations between emission species of E_EC, E_ORG, E_NO3, E_SO4 and 726
E_PM25. The emission species data are derived from the NEI’05 emissions set for the innermost 727
domain of the WRF/Chem model 728
729
Figure 3 Cross-correlations between the five variables of the BEC. These variables are (a) full 730
variables and (b) unbalanced variables of EC, OC, , and OTR. 731
732
Figure 4 Vertical profiles of the standard deviation of the variables. (a) full variables and (b) 733
unbalanced variables 734
735
Figure 5 Same as Figure 4, with the exception of the horizontal auto-correlation curves of the 736
variables. The horizontal thin line is the reference line of
for determining the 737
horizontal correlation scales. 738
739
740
Figure 6 Vertical correlations of the five variables of the BEC. The left column represents the full 741
variables, and the right column represents the unbalanced variables. 742
743
Figure 7 The topography of the innermost domain and the locations of surface monitoring stations 744
(black dots). The red square is the location of Los Angeles 745
746
Figure 8 Aircraft flight tracks during the time window of data assimilation for nine cases. The 747
color of the track indicates the aircraft height. 748
749
Figure 9 Surface distributions of increments of the five variables of EC, OC, NO3, SO4 and OTR 750
at 12:00 UTC on June 3, 2010. The left column and right column are from DA-full and 751
DA-balance, respectively. 752
753
Figure 10 Same as Figure 9, with the exception of the vertical sections along 35 N. 754
755
Figure 11 Scatter plots of observed concentrations of PM2.5 versus simulated PM2.5 concentrations 756
of the experiments of (a) Control, (b) DA-full, and (c) DA-balance for all nine cases. 757
758
Figure 12 The averaged (a) Correlations, (b) root-mean-square errors (RMSE in µg/m3) and (c) 759
mean bias (BIAS in µg/m3) of the PM2.5 concentration forecasts against observations as a function 760
of forecast duration. 761
762