Upload
arlene-shavonne-baker
View
234
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
5QC Update
IPSG meeting, Bonn, May 2007
2
5QC Update - IPSG meeting, Bonn, May 2007
Results of IPSG subgroup meeting on march 19. in Paris and scientific rapporteurs feed back—Themes—Best practice description format—CAF—Internet site
5QC Agora pre-program Introduction to scientific survey and study
3
Follow up of Feb and march Meetings
1. Themes of the conference
2. Best practice description format
3. Best practice workshop format
4. Best practice selection process
5. The CAF at the 5QC
6. 5QC Website
4
Themes of the conference
Sub-themes 2 and 4 have been clarified: the 2nd referring to the citizen as an actor, and the 4th to stakeholders as a whole. ST 2 : Citizen participation as a driving force towards public quality
ST 4 : Beyond the citizen, involving all stakeholders for quality
Translation of Sub-theme 3 have been reviewed ST 3 : Taking into account new key social issues :
Businesses are taken into account In order to promote diversity, it is best for each country to present
best practices belonging to different subtopics. However, this should not be considered as compulsory.
The subtheme(s) related to the best practice will be indicated by the author himself. The final classification will be done by the 5QC team with the help of the scientific rapporteurs. The presentations should be adjusted to reflect the themes they illustrate.
5
Best practice description format:brief one-page description
A consensus has been reached over the fact that the authors of good practices provide the short description of their cases themselves. A detailed description of what is expected should be established.
This description will be done by the authors themselves, with the help, and under control of national IPSG members.
In order to ensure consistency, the 5QC preparation team, with the help of the scientific rapporteurs, will check through them again.
Items to be included
1. Identification
2. Quality improvement issues
3. The Actors
4. The Measure of Success
5. The Lesson learned
6. Project innovation content and transferability Example provided in the guidelines
6
Best practice description formatdetailed descriptions (10 pages max)
1. Identification
What, who, where…
2. Summary
60 words
3. Quality improvement issues
4. Project background
5. The actors
6. The Work Process / Approach
7. The Measure of Success
8. The Main Obstacles of the Case
9. The Lesson learned
10. Project innovation content and transferability
7
Best practice description formatVideo presentations
Presenting a video is not unanimously agreed upon, some countries do not wish to do them and others will not be able to do them for all cases. All countries agree it should be optional. It is important to describe its contents, length, etc
— Doing a video presentation remains optional
— The maximum length should be 2 minutes
— Contents: a one-line presentation of the best practice; it could also be used during workshops; it is up to the author of the best practice to decide.
— The 5QC team will provide guidelines regarding acceptable formats.
8
Best practice workshop format
According to the answers to the 5QC questionnaire:
— The idea of having two different workshop formats does not spark off a clear majority.
— It would be better to have fewer presentations, but have them developed in depth.
— A booklet compiling all practices could be published.
Conclusions— One single format: 75 minute sessions: two presentations per workshop
— Enough time will be kept for discussion
— Choosing the facilitator, as well as preparing his/her intervention, should be done according to the theme.
9
Best practice selection process
A majority of countries is unfavourable to having the IPSG select best practices; the previous method seems preferable.
The 5QC team and the IPSG should provide guidelines A majority of countries do not oppose the idea of limiting the number of
practices to 2 per country
Conclusions
— The idea of having 2 best practices per country has been accepted
— The 5QC team and the IPSG will provide guidelines (Guidelines for the selection of best practice cases.)
10
The CAF at the 5QC
The EIPA suggests updating the study conducted in 2005 during the Luxemburg Presidency. The study would analyze the situation of CAF in member states, the support of national correspondents and resource centre, and conclude with qualitative objectives and recommendations to reach the quantitative objective of 2010 CAF users in 2010.
The CAF Centre would be a good opportunity to present different tools along with the CAF strategy. It would be a good meeting point for all CAF users.
Countries not using the CAF could present the models they refer to, in the global context of total quality management.
Space should be dedicated to work led by IPSG (Study on quality management conducted by Slovenia, Citizen charters, CSM,…)
11
5QC Website
Online database— Building up a documentary database directly fed by Member States would be
difficult: setting up, management, updating, etc. This question has long been addressed by the IPSG, no satisfactory organizational solution has ever been found.
— This database would be a doublet of the EUPAN database already online. — Having IPSG members feed the database has been rejected.
discussion forum— Putting links online could give further visibility to the activities undertaken by
Member States.— A discussion forum could help putting people in contact, favour exchanges,
enabling participants interested by the same topics in planning meetings.— Means of building an Internet Quality community— Favour an interactive preparation of the 5QC
12
BP Cases : What is next ?
- Final validation of these guidelines with the IPSG
-
- 3 May 2007
- The guidelines will be sent to Member States by IPSG members - June 2007
- The Member States select their best practice cases, and IPSG members send out a first version of the detailed descriptions
- 31st October 2007
- Finalization of the workshop programme - 2nd January 2008
- Feedback on the description by the scientific rapporteurs - 31st January 2008
- IPSG members send the 2nd version of the detailed description, they also send the short description, and optional video presentation
- 15 March 2008
- Sending documents for the presentation due during the workshops (slides, etc.)
- 3rd August 2008
13
5QC
Themes for the Agoras
april 2007
14
Agoras – themes suggested (1/2)
Titles Sub-theme
Are the needs of the citizens well apprehended? sub-theme 1 : Improving citizens’ lives
Citizen charters: myth or reality? sub-theme 1 : Improving citizens’ lives
Has e-government kept its promises? sub-theme 1 : Improving citizens’ lives
Is it possible to place the citizen at the heart of the development of rules and regulations?
sub-theme 2 : Citizen participation as a
driving force towards public quality
Is deliberative democracy the solution to further involve the citizen?
sub-theme 2 : Citizen participation as a
driving force towards public quality
Is participative evaluation of public action useful?
sub-theme 2 : Citizen participation as a
driving force towards public quality
15
Agoras – themes suggested (2/2)
Titles Sub-theme
Are public services accessible to everyone? Sub-theme 3 ::taking into
account key social issues
Are all citizens equal regarding public services? Sub-theme 3 ::taking into
account key social issues
How to make behaviours evolve? Rights and obligations of citizens in order to improve quality
Sub-theme 3 ::taking into account key social
issues
Is it possible to foster quality without staff engagement? sub-theme 4 :
Involving all stakeholders for public quality
NGOs: what role should stakeholders play in the production of public services of good quality?
sub-theme 4 : Involving all stakeholders
for public quality
Does outsourcing improve service quality? sub-theme 4 :
Involving all stakeholders for public quality
16
Agoras : what is next ?
Presentation of first draft of agora program May 3 2007
Comments on agora program by IPSG members May 21 2007
5QC team sends questionnaire for suggesting speakers May 11 2007
Suggestion of speakers by IPSG members June 30 2007
Presentation of second draft agora program July 16, 2007
17
5QC
scientific survey projectsupervised by scientific rapporteurs
april 2007
18
Objectives of the 5QC survey
Analyse how citizens perceive the fact of being placed at the heart of public quality and focus on the coproduction of public services:
— How are they consulted and how do they perceive it? — To what extent are they ready to contribute to the improvement of the quality of the
services? (question citizens on what they do rather than on what they say).— How do they perceive their interaction with public service providers? — In what way do they wish to participate to decision making?
Methodology :— A variety of key public services— A variety of citizens :
representative + focus cibles (disadvantaged groups)
— An appropriate geographic cluster (with a different public service traditions)
Survey at a European level — United Kingdom— France— Germany— Italy— Romania (?)— …
19
Expected Results
Analysing the citizen’s perceptions and practices pratiques : — Per country
— par category (age, sex, etc.),
— … Themes to tackle
What are citizens ready to do? o Participating to the service deliveredo Accepting the responsibility of the
productiono « citizen » involvement o « responsible » consumero Developing a sense of civic responsibility
— Does it depend on the socio-cultural background?
— Do citizens have the same attitude toward co-production with private and public services ?
— Do citizen behaviours differ when considering public or private services (self serivce)?
— …
Target services: — Public health (taking preventive actions,
etc)— Public security (auto-protection, local giving
a sense of responsibility at a local level)— environnement/ecology (recycling, water
savings, protection of the environment)— education (parental involvement, personal
work…)
20
Planning
selecting a project manager (piloting et carrying out the survey) — May-June 07
Designing and translating the questionnaires — by June/july 07
Searching and selecting a service provider in the selected countries — Sept 07
Submitting the questionnaire — Sept-Oct 07
Making the most of the results of the survey — March 08
Integrating the results to the 5QC (agoras, plenary sessions, etc.) — July 08
21
Thank you for your attention