1

ENDANGERED SPECIES UPDATE

National Military Fish and Wildlife Association Meeting

Arlington, VAMarch 2013

2

• Advanced notice of Proposed Rulemaking

• Regulatory Reform Efforts

• Multiple District Litigation Update

• Working Lands for Wildlife

• Partnership Tools & Opportunities

TOPICS

3

Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR)

• ANPR in 2012- received input on how to create incenti ves for voluntary conservati on acti ons

• Focus of opti ons:

– Incenti vizing voluntary pre-listi ng conservati on acti ons– Off -setti ng adverse eff ects of species being listi ng– Federal agency credit for pre-listi ng conservati on acti ons

• Responses:– Total of 95 responses received– Federal agencies (7), States (13), NGOs (40), other (35)

4

Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

• Most supported using voluntary conservation incentives for candidate and at-risk species

• Most supported developing and using conservation credits and banks

• Priorities developed by FWS & State Agency Team

• FWS will develop guidance, policy or revise regulations to implement recommendations

5

Regulatory Reform Efforts

• Significant portion of the range policy

• Impact analysis regulation (424.19)

6

Significant Portion of Range Policy

• Proposed revised joint policy published December 2011.

• Reopened comment period- February 2012.

• Proposes to define phrase “significant portion of its range” in ESA definition of endangered and threatened species.

• Anticipate final policy in mid- 2013

7

Impact Analyses-Critical Habitat

• February 28, 2012, Presidential Memorandum

• Draft economic analysis when designating critical habitat

• Published proposed joint revision to 50 CFR 424.19 in Aug. 2012

8

Impact Analyses-Critical Habitat

• Proposed joint revised 424.19 regulati on includes:

• Economic analysis-with proposed CH• Incremental approach-best way to measure

economic impact of CH designati on• Sec Interior/Commerce -sole discreti on to

exclude areas from CH

9

Regulatory Reform Efforts

• Incidental take

• Definition of adverse modification or destruction of habitat

• Critical habitat process (424.12)

• Implementation of section 4(b)(2) of the ESA

10

Anticipated Regulations / Policy Reform

• Incidental take – clarify how take is evaluated

• New defi niti on-adverse modifi cati on or habitat destructi on

• CH process (424.12) – clarify process meaning

• 4(b)(2) Implementati on– provide policy on CH exclusions

11

• FY 2011 > 2016 – proposed listi ng determinati on for the 253 candidate species (130 by end of FY 13)

• Plan provides clarity & certainty to state wildlife agencies, stakeholders, & other partners about when FWS will make specifi c species’ listi ng determinati ons.

• MDL agreements:• Reduced liti gati on-driven workloads • Allows FWS to focus resources on priority species

Multiple District Litigation (MDL)

12

• MDL workplan for actions from FY 2013 through FY 2018 available online at:

htt p://www.fws.gov/endangered/improving_ESA/listi ng_workplan_FY13-18.html

• Listi ng Program backlog- mid FY 2013:• 168 candidate species• Approx 500 12-month fi ndings• Peti ti ons to list approx 60 species

Multiple District Litigation

13

• FWS-NRCS partnership– provide landowners with technical and fi nancial assistance

for conservati on– Goal driven

• New England cottontail• Bog turtle (northern

pop.)• Golden-winged warbler• Gopher tortoise

• Southwestern willow flycatcher

• Greater sage-grouse• Lesser prairie-chicken

Working Lands for Wildlife (WLFW)

14

15

WLFW based on conference and Biological Opinions prepared for each of the listed or candidate species, FWS established an historic 30 year period of regulatory predictability for WLFW participating non-Federal landowners

Working Lands for Wildlife (WLFW)

16

• Landowner tools– CCA

• Opportunities for non-Federal lands– CCAA– SHA

• Conservation Tools Handout Available• Sikes Act. FWS OK with 10 year plans with

annual updates vs. current 5 year plans

Partnership Tools & Opportunities

17

• Predictability / Minimize Uncertainty– Section 7 conferencing

• Coordination & resource leveraging– Readiness and Environmental Protection

Initiative-DoD– Military Services Buff er lands programs– Identify priority species for conservation– Apply tools to DoD buff er lands

Partnership Tools & Opportunities

18

QUESTIONS/COMMENTS/DISCUSSION

DOUGLAS KROFTACHIEF, BRANCH OF ENDANGERED SPECIES LISTING

USFWS, ENDANGERED SPECIES-HEADQUARTERS703-358-2527

Douglas_kroft a@fws.gov