Upload
rb21rb
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
civil engineering project
Citation preview
Municipal Solid Waste Management in Bangalore and the Concept of Mini Biogas Plant in Urban Localities
Suchitra Ramesh, Asif Usman, Adil Usman*, Divakar B.P
Reva Institute of Technology and Management
ABSTRACT: Municipal solid waste management
(MSWM) is one of the major environmental problems of
Indian cities. Solid waste is defined as the material, which
arises from various human activities and which is
normally discarded as useless and unwanted. Improper
management of municipal solid waste (MSW) causes
hazards to inhabitants. Various studies reveal that about
90% of MSW is disposed off unscientifically in open
dumps and landfills, creating problems to public health
and the environment. In the present paper a survey of
case studies conducted on MSWM in few cities across
India is reviewed to gain insight into solid waste
management. Several data concerning SWM in
Bangalore has been collected to understand the problems
being faced by Bangaloreans. An exclusive survey is
carried out within the campus of Reva Institute of
Technology, Bangalore to quantify the waste generation
and to come up with a feasible SWM solution which can
be implemented within the campus.
Index Terms: Municipal solid waste management
(MSWM), Agricultural waste, Waste-To-Energy (WTE),
Geographical Information System (GIS)
I. INTRODUCTION
The generated waste consists of many types which
are not segregated at the source in majority of cities
across India. Although few municipalities have taken
measures for bringing awareness to general
community about segregation of wastes, no
significant improvement has been achieved in waste
management. People discard wastes of all types
which are then collected for disposal. Majority of
solid wastes end up in landfills and thus create health
hazards due to unplanned and unscientific methods
followed in waste disposals. Due to rapid growth,
urban areas are facing severe shortage of landfills and
as a result the community at large is now at the risk
of hazards due to delay in waste disposals. The city
of Bangalore, once a pensioner’s paradise, has come
to known lately as “garbage city” thanks to garbage
pileups owing to lack of landfills. Open dumping of
garbage breeds flies, mosquitoes, cockroaches, rats,
and other pests that spread diseases. Unfortunately
Solid waste management did not receive attention it
deserved until now. It was never taken seriously
either by public, concerned agency or authorities. The
community has woken up from its slumber now and
desperately looking for some miracle to address the
issue. In this paper the earlier case studies conducted
[1]-[3] on Aurangabad, Manipur and Kolkata are
reviewed and few statistical data concerning Solid
Waste Management in Bangalore collected to
understand the problem. As a case study, a survey of
generation and waste management within the campus
of Reva Institute of Technology, situated in the IT
city Bangalore is carried out to come up with a
sustainable waste management system within the
campus. The case study conducted throws some light
on the amount of waste generation as well as its
management.
Objectives:
To bring awareness on SWM at local level
To highlight the establishment of local potable
mini biogas plants.
To involve youth in the campus to address the
global problem.
Methodology:
As the topic is new, the team members decided to
collect literature review of SWM practices in Indian
cities to understand the widespread practices across
India. Few data regarding SWM in Bangalore city
and in the campus of REVA ITM, Bangalore were
collected.
II. MSW disposals and treatment
Composting (aerobic composting and vermi-
composting) and waste-to-energy (WTE)
(incineration, biomethanisation), are the two leading
waste disposal mechanisms being adopted in India
[1]. WTE mechanism for disposal of MSW is a
relatively new concept in India. Although these have
been tried and tested in developed countries with
positive results, these are yet to get off the ground in
India largely because of the fact that financial
viability and sustainability is still being tested.
Different methods for the disposal and treatment of
MSW are discussed belo w.
978-1-4799-2402-8/13/$31.00 ©2013 IEEE 468 IEEE 2013 Global Humanitarian Technology Conference
a. Biodegradation: [7]
Biodegradation is a biological way of recycling the
wastes where decaying process is carried out by
bacteria, fungi, insects, worms, and other organisms
that eat dead material and recycle it into new forms.
Through composting, we accelerate natural
biodegradation and convert wastes to a valuable
resource. This kind of elimination of waste can be
carried out only with organic waste which is about
76% of total waste [5 ].
b. Automated solid waste processing [7]:
The decision to implement solid waste collection
automation is a complex one and involves a number
of factors that should be considered, including
engineering, risk management, technology
assessment, costs, and public acceptance yet has a lot
of advantages for both residents as well as the
municipal corporation but at the same time, it
increases the risk factor involved in safety and health
issues of the solid waste collection workers.
c. Incineration [7]:
Incineration is a waste treatment process that
involves the combustion of organic substances
contained in waste materials. Incineration of waste
materials converts the waste into ash, flue gas, and
heat. The ash is mostly formed by
the inorganic constituents of the waste, and may take
the form of solid lumps or particulates carried by the
flue gas. The heat generated by incineration can be
used to generate electric power. Incineration with
energy recovery is one of several waste-to-energy
technologies such as gasification, plasma arc
gasification, pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion.
Advantages:
Incineration is an efficient way to reduce the waste
volume and the demand for landfill space.
Incineration plants can be located close to the waste
generation centre, thus reducing the cost of waste
transportation.
Disadvantages: An incineration plant involves heavy
investments and high operating costs.
d. Recycling [7]:
It is a process of converting materials (waste) into
new products to prevent waste of potentially useful
materials, reduce the consumption of fresh raw
materials, reduce energy usage, reduce air pollution
(from incineration) and water pollution
(from landfilling) by reducing the need for
"conventional" waste disposal, and lower greenhouse
gas emissions.
Waste recycling has some significant advantages that
it leads to less utilization of raw materials, reduces
environmental impacts arising from waste treatment
and disposal, makes the surroundings cleaner and
healthier, saves on landfill space and finally saves
money.
e. Membrane Bioreactors [7]:
Membrane bioreactor (MBR) is the combination of
a membrane process like microfiltration or ultra
filtration with a suspended growth bioreactor, and is
now widely used for municipal and industrial
waste treatment.
III. CASE STUDIES OF MAJOR STUDIES
Case studies on SWM in major cities of India have
been reported [1]-[3]. A summary of the findings are
given below:
a. Aurangabad City :
The report suggests that Aurangabad has experienced
serious environment degradation on account of direct
disposal of solid wastes. The city is now being
assisted by Geographical Information System (GIS) a
tool to support the planning of waste management.
GIS has helped to manipulate data to simulate
alternatives and to take the most effective decisions.
But several problems still persists- GIS gave the
information only at the point of interests like waste
bins and open dumps ignoring the other filthy areas.
GIS was not reliable during bad weathers and the
heavy cost factor is another bane to the prospect [1 ].
Economy criteria consideration, environmentally
sensitive areas consideration, identification of
recyclable waste generating areas and flexibility in
model further added to the problem of using GIS [ 1].
2. Kolkata City:
Taking the extract from the case study done by the
reference it is seen that, maintaining the quantities of
MSW in Kolkata is a tedious task. The major
problems faced by the city are: process of segregating
the waste, large number of open vats, low efficiency
of waste transport system with aged vehicles, low
collection efficiency in newly added areas, improper
recycling unit and many other factors. Due to
climatic factors like high temperature and humidity
along with high organic matter content, MSW
decomposes rapidly resulting in unhygienic
conditions. Hence in most areas, collection has to be
done on a daily basis. A system for collecting and
storage of solid waste is implemented by Kolkata
Municipal Corporation (KMC). Composting
methodology is practiced for treatment of solid waste
[2]. This method is only applicable for organic waste
and is the flaw seen in this practice.
3. Manipur City:
Taking the extract from the case study done by the
reference it is seen that management of the large
quantities of MSW in Manipur city is generally
carried out by collection, segregation, storage,
transportation and disposal which is the same
methodology as followed by Kolkata.
Thus analyzing the above methodologies practiced in
the three cities, it is seen that most of the practices
implemented have limitations either because the
methods are waste specific or improper executions.
The following paragraph discusses SWM
implemented in Bangalore.
4. Bangalore (SWM) Statistics
Solid Waste Management in Bruhat Bangalore
Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)
Relevant data and statistics were collected from
various sources and officials of BBMP regarding the
solid waste management prevailing in the entire city.
Bangalore has a total area of about 800sq.kms with a
population of 80 lakh. Bangalore is divided into 8
zones and 198 municipal wards which include about
25 lakh household and 3.5 lakh commercial
properties. The per capita waste generated is about
350 grams per day which is merely domestic waste.
[5 ]
a. Physical composition of MSW (%):
Table I Physical Composition of MSW in percentage
[5]
Serial Number Product Percentage
1. Vegetable 0.30
2. Paper 0.09
3. Plastic 0.12
4. Cardboard 0.04
5. Textiles 0.04
6. Grass/leaves/wood 0.06
7. Leather 0.00
8. Battery 0.00
9. Electronic item 0.02
10. Metal 0.01
11. Organic 0.23
12. Glass 0.03
13. Debris 0.05
14. Biomedical 0.02
TOTAL 1.00
.
Nearly 54% of total waste constitutes household
wastes and rest contributes waste generated from
other sources. Composition of Municipal Solid Waste
is analyzed and interpreted in Table I and Table II as
shown. Following the above mentioned statistics, it is
analyzed that 70% of MSW activity has been
outsourced and 30% is managed by BBMP.
Collection of waste takes place on a door-to-door
basis using pushcarts and auto tippers. This forms the
primary collection of waste, where waste is collected
in unsegregated form as the on-site segregation is not
practiced.
b. Chemical composition of MSW (%):
Table II Chemical Composition of MSW in
percentage. [5]
Sl. No Constitue
nt/Propert
y
Minimu
m
Maximum
1. C 13.00 42.60
2. N 0.28 1.23
3. P2O5 0.46 0.92
4. K2O 0.45 1.07
5. Moisture% 13.80 40.90
Secondary collection and transportation includes
compactors, tipper-lorries, mechanical sweepers etc.
The waste collected from households is shifted to the
treatment sites through trucks. Thus, the
unsegregated waste reaches the processing plants.
Few plants are established for composting the organic
waste as well as recycling of plastic, metals etc. Dry
waste collection centers are set up for recycling the
dry materials like plastic, paper, glass and metals. In
Bangalore there are few BBMP established
processing and disposing sites as mentioned below
table:
Table III BBMP established processing and disposing
sites [5]
Sl.n
o
Name of
the project
Capacity
of plant
Technology
adopted 1 M/s
Ramky
600MTP
D
Aerobic
Composting and
scientific land fill 2 M/s
S.G.R.R.L
100MTP
D
Waste to energy
(composting) 3 M/s
Terrafirm
a
100MTP
D
vermincomposting
, biomethanisation
The statistical data of SWM in Bangalore is
presented Figure 1. The percentage wise division
clearly depicts how much waste is being land filled,
recycled and composted and finally and how much is
recovered in terms of energy.
Fig. 1 Pie Chart of SWM of Bangalore [5].
From the above information collected from BBMP,
following advantages can be summarized.
Advantages:
1. About 8% of waste plastic is segregated which can
be used in the construction of pavement roads.
2. Bangalore is practicing the conversion of plastics
into diesel by following depolymerization technology
on a small scale. If this is implemented on a larger
scale, then 100% management of solid waste can be
achieved in the city.
Even though BBMP has made segregation of wastes
at the source mandatory, majority of localities
continue to dump unsegregated wastes. Unless a
stricter law comes into effect, the initiative by BBMP
will not become successful.
IV. Case study within the college campus
A survey was conducted within the college campus
of Reva Institute of Technology and Management,
situated in Northern Bangalore, Karnataka, India. The
college is situated in the outskirts of the city having
pleasant ambience with thirty six acres of area. The
campus has twelve blocks including academic block,
administrative block, residential quarters and hostels
for students. The total strength of the students within
campus is around 5000, in which ration of boys to
girls is 3:2, while the number of faculties is around
300. Huge amount of waste is generated due to the
activities within the campus. The waste generated in
kgs can be estimated to around 300kgs, which is very
high and unbelievable. Thus a survey was done
within the campus and following statistics were
collected and tabulated in Table IV.
The major part of the waste constitutes food,
vegetables, paper, plastic and glass. The daily
average generation of food wastes comes to about 7-
8%.This waste is taken every two days for
incineration far away from city. The fallen dry leaves
in the campus are used as fuels for cooking by the
workers. The ashes in turn become waste. Solid
waste generated from canteens and college is later
dumped and burnt behind the campus. The smoke
thus generated is a cause for pollution and health
hazard.
Table IV Waste constituents
Sl.No Constituent Percentage %
1 Vegetable & fruit
waste from mess and
canteen
17.0
2 Paper 15.0
3 Plastic 7.0
4 Food 12.5
5 Grass/leaves/wood 9.0
6 Chemicals from
laboratories
8.5
7 Textile 2.0
8 Leather 1.5
9 Electronic items 5.5
10 Metals 8.5
11 Organic 9.5
12 Debris 4.0
TOTAL 100
Proposal: The survey carried out has thrown light on
the problems with waste management system being
practiced and the lack of awareness among people.
This motivated us to explore further to look for
practices to mitigate the problem at the local level.
One such solution was found in [6] which discussed
mini bio-gas plants.
V. Mini Biogas plants in urban/rural
municipal locality.
Paper [6] discusses the application of mini biogas
plants of 200 liters proposed by Bio-based Energy
Laboratory, of Kathmandu valley. The cost of it is
about 60$ and quite affordable if few houses make a
joint venture.
The typical features of a mini digester are given
below:
Fig. 2 Proposed Biogas plant with its operating parts
The above figure shows the bio digester which is
different from the one used in Kathmandu Valley.
The construction features and operations are briefly
given here [5].
Construction
The fixed-dome plant consisting of a biodigester (2)
where fixed non movable gas is stored. The gas is
stored in the upper part of the digester. When gas
production commences, the slurry is displaced into
the compensating tank (3). Gas pressure increases
with the volume of gas stored, therefore the volume
of the digester should be limited. Mixing tank (1)
with inlet pipe is provided where one can dump the
waste every alternate day, prior to which one cycle
should have completed in fifteen days at the
beginning. The gasholder (4) is provided along with
the gas pipe (5) as the outlet. The plant is provided
with the airtight gas seal (6). During the process of
gas formation there are number of levels involves
which include the formation of sludge (9) which is
precipitated at the bottom surface of the plant. The
stones and grits (10) too are separated and
accumulated at the bottom.
Process
The process of formation of gas takes place by the
action of putrefy active bacteria, which break down
organic material under anaerobic conditions. All feed
materials consisting of organic solids, inorganic
solids and water undergo the process of gas
formation biologically under the action of these
bacteria. Addition of water gives the substrate fluid
properties. It is easier for the putrefactive bacteria to
come into contact with feed material which is still
fresh when the slurry is in liquid state. This
accelerates the digestion (give the chemical name for
this process) process. Regular stirring thus speeds up
the gas production. Slurry with solids content of 5-
10% is particularly well suited to the operation of
continuous biogas plants.
The gas is stored in the upper part of the digester.
When gas production commences, the slurry is
displaced into the compensating tank. The gas so
produced can be transferred through gaslight seal
mounted securely on the wall to the kitchen.
Cost: As mentioned in [6], the cost of this proposed
digester is estimated to be less than US$50. The
Actual cost for installation within a campus
considering the benefits in terms of savings in
transportation cost (associated pollution) may be
justified. Moreover, the generation of bio-gas from
the organic waste can be used in canteens in the
campus.
The main advantage of this digester is the cost [6]
compared to the conventional digester. The mini bio-
digester has only one fiber tank unlike conventional
bio-digesters that use two tanks and hence is
economical for small locality. A detailed feasibility
report is ongoing to set up similar biodigesters in our
campus to address the global issue. Through this the
whole community will be engaged in waste
management.
VI. CONCLUSION
In this paper various methods of disposal and
treatment of solid waste is discussed in detail. The
various methods followed in Aurangabad, Kolkata
and Manipur city has been observed and their
drawbacks are noted down. A case study of SWM in
Bangalore city has been conducted. An attempt has
been made to collect data of waste management in
our college campus. From the study of various case
studies, it is felt that the mini bio gas plants could be
set up within our campus or in small localities to
recover energy from wastes. A detailed feasibility
report will be prepared with the help of MBA
department and the report will be submitted to the
management to consider setting up plants within the
campus. As there is a plan for setting up of new
campus, it is envisaged that the management take our
proposal into consideration.
VII. ACKNOWLEGEMENT
The authors acknowledge the support from Principal
and management of REVA ITM for this work.
Special gratitude is conveyed to the officials of
BBMP for providing the relevant current statistics.
VIII. REFERENCES
1. Shaikh Moiz Ahmed, Hassan Muhammad, Åke
Sivertun:Linköping, Solid Waste Management
Planning using GIS and Remote Sensing
Technologies Case Study Aurangabad City, India
University, Sweden.
2. Bidyut Kr. Bhattacharya, Swapan Das ,A Holistic
Approach for Integrated Solid Waste Management
System of Kolkata Municipality Corporation Area
Bengal Engineering & Science University, Shibpur,
Howrah, India.
3. Ch. Raghumani Singh and Mithra Dey, Solid
Waste Management of Thoubal Municipality,
Manipur- A Case Study
4. Biogas Plants by Ludwig Sasse.
5. Solid Waste Management in Bruhat Bangalore
Mahanagara Palike, Handbooks on Statistics, BBMP.
6. S. P. Lohani, A. Satyal, S. Timilsina, S. Parajuli, P.
Dhital,Energy Recovery Potential from Solid Waste
in Kathmandu Valley, Bio-based Energy Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kathmandu
University, Dhulikhel, Nepal
7. Handbook on Biogas and its applications by Niir
Broad.