If you can't read please download the document
Upload
truongthu
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
80
CHAPTER 4
APPLICATION OF WORK EQUATIONS AND THEIR
PARAMETRIC STUDY
4.1. Introduction:
In the last chapter the work equations are derived for corner openings of
orthogonal slabs and can be applied theoretically to various problems and a
parametric study on strength of orthogonal slab with openings will be made with the
following data:
1. The aspect ratio of slab and opening (r, and respectively).
2. Location of opening
3. The Coefficient of Orthotrophy ().
4. Coefficients of Orthogonal Moments ( 'xK , '
yK , I1, I2, I3 and I4).
5. Sum of the Coefficients of Orthogonal Moments (K).
6. Various support conditions of slab (Nine edge conditions).
In addition to the above, a comparative study can be made in strengths of
orthogonal slab with openings with solid slab. The valid admissible governing failure
pattern can also be found.
4.2 Importance of choosing different moment coefficients:
To obtain m
wLy2
values the work equations derived in the previous chapter are
to be evaluated for different parameters given in the section 4.1. The work so for
81
published by different researchers2,8,11,14,17
predominantly concludes that the value of
m
wLy2
mainly depends on the selection of orthogonal moment coefficients ( 'xK ,
'
yK ,
I1, I2, I3 and I4), coefficient of orthotropy () and sum of orthogonal moment
coefficients (K) for a given specific problem. Hence the author has chosen three
different varieties of orthogonal moment coefficients, one basing on affined theorm3,14
and other two basing on individual designers choice as given in appendix 1.
4.3 Segment Equilibrium Method:
To verify the value obtained by using virtual work method, the segment
equilibrium method has been used for various problems of slabs with and without
opening for various parameters mentioned in section 4.1. To solve a slab by
equilibrium method, the steps suggested by Park, R. and W.L. Gamble14
are followed.
The section below gives a comparative study of virtual work and segment equilibrium
method for a solid slab.
4.4 Shifting of failure patterns in solid slab:
Problem 4.1: A continuous solid slab whose aspect ratio is 1.2, is provided
with following orthogonal moment coefficients as given below. (Refer article 4.6)
'
xK = 0.33, '
yK = 1.0, I1(I3) = 1.0, I2(I4) = 1.67, K = 4.0, = 0.5 (designers choice
coefficients)
Problem 4.2: A two adjacent edges continuous solid slab whose aspect ratio is
1.2, is provided with following orthogonal moment coefficients as given below.
(Refer article 4.7)
82
'
xK = 0.9, '
yK = 0.5, I1(I3) = 1.5, I2(I4) = 1.1, K = 4.0, = 1.5 (designers
choice coefficients)
The solutions obtained by computer programme and segmental equilibrium
method are shown in the following pages.
The solution of these two problems clearly indicate that the choice of selecting
orthogonal moment coefficients is very much essential in order to have the desired
strength and failure pattern. Shifting of failure patterns in solid slab for other edge
conditions (O.S.D, O.L.D, O.S.C, O.L.C, T.S.C, T.L.C, S.S) are explained in the
Article Nos. 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14. The same idea has been extended
to slabs with corner openings.
4.5 Shifting of failure patterns in slab with corner opening:
Problem 4.3: A continuous solid slab whose aspect ratio is 1.0, is provided
with three different sets of orthogonal moment coefficients as given below. (Refer
Article Nos. 4.15, 4.16 and 4.17)
Set 1: 'x
K = 0.5, '
yK = 1.0, I1(I3) = 0.5, I2(I4) = 1.0, K = 3.0, = 0.5 (affine theorem
coefficients)
Set 2: 'x
K = 0.3, '
yK = 0.8, I1(I3) = 0.7, I2(I4) = 1.2, K = 3.0, = 0.5 (designers
choice coefficients)
Set 3: 'x
K = 0.7, '
yK = 1.2, I1(I3) = 0.3, I2(I4) = 0.8, K = 3.0, = 0.5 (designers
choice coefficients reversed)
83
Problem 4.4: A two adjacent edges continuous solid slab whose aspect ratio is
1.0, is provided with following orthogonal moment coefficients as given below.
(Refer Article Nos. 4.18, 4.19 and 4.20)
Set 1: 'x
K = 0.8, 'y
K = 1.2, I1(I3) = 0.8, I2(I4) = 1.2, K = 4.0, = 0.667 (affine theorem
coefficients)
Set 2: 'x
K = 0.6, '
yK = 1, I1(I3) = 1, I2(I4) = 1.4, K = 4.0, = 1.0 (designers choice
coefficients)
Set 3: 'x
K = 1.0, '
yK = 1.4, I1(I3) = 0.6, I2(I4) = 1.0, K = 4.0, = 0.667 (designers
choice coefficients reversed)
The solutions obtained by computer programme and segmental equilibrium
method are shown in the following pages.
The solution of these two problems clearly indicate that the choice of selecting
orthogonal moment coefficients is very much essential in order to have the desired
strength and failure pattern. Shifting of failure patterns in slab with corner opening
for other edge conditions of the slab (O.S.D, O.L.D, O.S.C, O.L.C, T.S.C, T.L.C and
S.S) are explained in the Article Nos. 4.21, 4.22, 4.23, 4.24, 4.25, 4.26, 4.27, 4.28,
4.29, 4.30, 4.31, 4.32, 4.33, 4.34, 4.35, 4.36, 4.37, 4.38, 4.39 and 4.40 respectively.
84
4.6. CONTINUOUS SLAB (C.S.) (Refer Fig. 4.1)
r = 1.2
= 0.5, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 41.60588
r1 = 2.73986 c1 = 4.4
r2 = 2.73986 c2 = 4.4
r3 = 2.00 c3 = 5.0
Failure Pattern: I
Segmental equilibrium method:
Segment A:
0.5 10 4.42 w/3
= 10 0.33m + 10 1.0m m
wLy2
= 41.21
Segment B:
0.5 4.4 52 w/3 + 3.2 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.4 52 w/3
= 12 1.0m + 12 1.67m m
wLy2
= 41.78
Segment C:
0.5 10 4.42 w/3
= 10 0.33m + 10 1.0m m
wLy2
= 41.21
Segment D:
0.5 4.4 52 w/3 + 3.2 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.4 52 w/3
= 12 1.0m + 12 1.67m m
wLy2
= 41.78
Average m
wLy2
= 41.50
1.0
m
0.3
3 m
1.0 m
1.67 m
85
86
4.7. TWO ADJACENT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.A.C.) (Refer Fig. 4.2)
r = 1.2
= 1.5, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 24.65619
r1 = 1.61237 c1 = 7.44
r3 = 1.59987 c3 = 6.3
r4 = 2.86704 c4 = 3.5
Failure Pattern: 2
Segmental equilibrium method:
Segment A:
0.5 3.5 7.442 w/3 + 0.20 7.442 w/2 + 0.5 6.3 7.442 w/3
= 10 0.9m + 10 1.5m m
wLy2
= 25.0140
Segment B:
0.5 12 6.32 w/3
= 12 0.5m + 12 1.1m m
wLy2
= 24.1875
Segment C:
0.5 6.3 4.562 w/3 + 0.20 4.562 w/2 + 0.5 3.5 4.562 w/3
= 10 0.9m m
wLy2
= 24.9707
Segment D:
0.5 12 3.52 w/3
= 12 0.5m m
wLy2
= 24.4898
Average m
wLy2
= 24.6655
1.5
m
0.9
m
0.5 m
1.1 m
87
88
4.8. ONE SHORT EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.D.) (Refer Fig. 4.3)
r = 1.2
= 0.667, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 35.80807
r1 = 2.31844 c1 = 5.2
r2 = 3.78986 c2 = 3.2
r3 = 2.00 c3 = 5.0
Failure Pattern: I
Segmental equilibrium method:
Segment A:
0.5 10 5.22 w/3
= 10 0.6m + 10 1.0m m
wLy2
= 35.50
Segment B:
0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 3.6 52 w/2 + 0.5 3.2 52 w/3
= 12 1.0m + 12 1.4m m
wLy2
= 36.0
Segment C:
0.5 10 3.22 w/3
= 10 0.6m m
wLy2
= 35.15
Segment D:
0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 3.6 52 w/2 + 0.5 3.2 52 w/3
= 12 1.0m + 12 1.4m m
wLy2
= 36.0
Average m
wLy2
= 35.6625
1.0
m
0.6
m
1.0 m
1.4 m
89
90
4.9. ONE LONG EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.D) (Refer Fig. 4.4)
r = 1.2
= 1.0, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 31.01776
r1 = 2.0 c1 = 6.0
r3 = 1.60987 c3 = 6.2
r4 = 2.9397 c4 = 3.4
Failure Pattern: 2
Segmental equilibrium method:
Segment A:
0.5 3.4 62 w/3 + 0.4 62 w/2 + 0.5 6.2 62 w/3
= 10 0.5m + 10 1.5m m
wLy2
= 30.8642
Segment B:
0.5 12 6.22 w/3
= 12 0.6m + 12 1.4m m
wLy2
= 31.2175
Segment C:
0.5 6.2 62 w/3 + 0.4 62 w/2 + 0.5 3.4 62 w/3
= 10 0.5m + 10 1.5m m
wLy2
= 30.8642
Segment D:
0.5 12 3.42 w/3
= 12 0.6m m
wLy2
= 31.1419
Average m
wLy2
= 31.0219
1.5
m
0.5
m
0.6 m
1.4 m
91
92
4.10. ONE SHORT EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.5)
r = 1.2
= 0.667, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 35.09861
r1 = 2.29259 c1 = 5.2
r2 = 4.09986 c2 = 2.9
r3 = 2.00 c3 = 5
Failure Pattern : 1
Segmental equilibrium method:
Segment A:
0.5 10 5.22 w/3
= 10 0.5m + 10 1.1m m
wLy2
= 35.5029
Segment B:
0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 3.9 52 w/2 + 0.5 2.9 52 w/3
= 12 2.4m m
wLy2
= 34.9091
Segment C:
0.5 10 2.92 w/3
= 10 0.5m m
wLy2
= 35.6717
Segment D:
0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 3.9 52 w/2 + 0.5 2.9 52 w/3
= 12 2.4m m
wLy2
= 34.9091
Average m
wLy2
= 35.2482
1.1
m
0.5
m
2.4 m
93
94
4.11. ONE LONG EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.C.) (Refer Fig. 4.6)
r = 1.2
= 0.667, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 29.49768
r1 = 2.09920 c1 = 5.7
r2 = 2.09920 c2 = 5.7
r3 = 1.5 c3 = 6.67
Failure Pattern : 1
Segmental equilibrium method:
Segment A:
0.5 10 5.72 w/3
= 10 1.6m m
wLy2
= 29.5476
Segment B:
0.5 5.7 6.672 w/3 + 0.60 6.672 w/2 + 0.5 5.7 6.672 w/3
= 12 0.6m + 12 1.8m m
wLy2
= 29.4251
Segment C:
0.5 10 5.72 w/3
= 10 1.6m m
wLy2
= 29.5476
Segment D:
0.5 5.7 3.332 w/3 + 0.60 3.332 w/2 + 0.5 5.7 3.332 w/3
= 12 0.6m m
wLy2
= 29.5135
Average m
wLy2
= 29.5085
1.6
m
0.6 m
1.8 m
95
96
4.12. TWO SHORT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.7)
r = 1.2
= 0.5, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 41.70639
r1 = 2.72808 c1 = 4.4
r2 = 2.72808 c2 = 4.4
r3 = 2.0 c3 = 5.0
Failure Pattern : 1
Segmental equilibrium method:
Segment A:
0.5 10 4.42 w/3
= 10 0.54m + 10 0.8m m
wLy2
= 41.5246
Segment B:
0.5 4.40 52 w/3 + 3.20 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.40 52 w/3
= 12 2.67m m
wLy2
= 41.7895
Segment C:
0.5 10 4.402 w/3
= 10 0.54m + 10 0.8m m
wLy2
= 41.5246
Segment D:
0.5 4.40 52 w/3 + 3.20 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.40 52 w/3
= 12 2.67m m
wLy2
= 41.7895
Average m
wLy2
= 41.6571
0.8
m
0.5
4 m
2.67 m
97
98
4.13. TWO LONG EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.8)
r = 1.2
= 1.5, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 39.19795
r1 = 2.0 c1 = 6
r3 = 2.01986 c3 = 4.9
r4 = 2.01986 c4 = 4.9
Failure Pattern : 2
Segmental equilibrium method:
Segment A:
0.5 4.90 62 w/3 + 0.2 62 w/2 + 0.5 4.90 62 w/3
= 10 2.4m m
wLy2
= 38.4615
Segment B:
0.5 12 4.902 w/3
= 12 0.5m + 12 1.1m m
wLy2
= 39.9833
Segment C:
0.5 4.90 62 w/3 + 0.2 62 w/2 + 0.5 4.90 62 w/3
= 10 2.4m m
wLy2
= 38.4615
Segment D:
0.5 12 4.902 w/3
= 12 0.5m + 12 1.1m m
wLy2
= 39.9833
Average m
wLy2
= 39.2224
2.4
m
0.5 m
1.1 m
99
100
4.14. SIMPLY SUPPORTED SLAB (S.S) (Refer Fig. 4.9)
r = 1.2
= 0.5, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 41.60588
r1 = 2.73986 c1 = 4.4
r2 = 2.73986 c2 = 4.4
r3 = 2.0 c3 = 5
Failure Pattern : 1
Segmental equilibrium method:
Segment A:
0.5 10 4.42 w/3
= 10 1.33m m
wLy2
= 41.2148
Segment B:
0.5 4.4 52 w/3 + 3.2 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.4 52 w/3
= 12 2.67m m
wLy2
= 41.7895
Segment C:
0.5 10 4.42 w/3
= 10 1.33m m
wLy2
= 41.2148
Segment D:
0.5 4.4 52 w/3 + 3.2 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.4 52 w/3
= 12 2.67m m
wLy2
= 41.7895
Average m
wLy2
= 41.5022
1.3
3 m
2.67 m
101
102
4.15. CONTINUOUS SLAB (C.S) (Refer Fig. 4.10)
= 0.3, = 0.2 r = 1.0
= 0.5, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients
m
wLy2
= 32.28133
r1 = 2.3 c1 = 4.4
r2 = 2.36923 c2 = 4.2
r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5
Failure Pattern: 2
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 2.44/2.5 1.0m = 0.976m
Segment A:
2.5 1.962 w/2 + 0.5 2.5 2.44 (1.96 + 2.44/3)w
+ 0.5 5.5 4.42 w/3 0.976m 1.96 = 8 0.5m + 8 0.5m
m
wLy2
= 31.9699
Segment B:
0.5 2.44 2.5 (2+2.5/3) w + (4.4 3) 22 w/2 + 1.4 4.52 w/2
+ 0.5 4.2 4.52 w/3 + 0.976m 2 = 7 1.0m + 8.04 1.0m
m
wLy2
= 32.8914
Segment C:
0.5 10 4.22 w/3 = (10 0.5m) + (10 0.5m)
m
wLy2
= 34.01
Segment D:
0.5 4.4 5.52 w/3 + 1.4 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 4.2 5.52 w/3
= 10 1.0m + 10 1.0m m
wLy2
= 30.99
Average m
wLy2
= 32.4653
0.5
m
0.5
m
1.0 m
1.0 m
103
104
4.16. CONTINUOUS SLAB (C.S) (Refer Fig. 4.11)
= 0.3, = 0.2
r = 1.0
= 0.5, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 32.14192
r1 = 2.4 c1 = 4.2
r2 = 2.31429 c2 = 4.3
r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5
Failure Pattern: 2
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 2.33/2.5 0.8m = 0.746m
Segment A:
2.5 1.872 w/2 + 0.5 2.5 2.33 (1.87 + 2.33/3)w
+ 0.5 5.5 4.22 w/3 0.746m 1.87 = 8 0.3m + 8 0.7m
m
wLy2
= 33.2573
Segment B:
0.5 2.33 2.5 (2+2.5/3) w + 1.2 22 w/2 + 1.5 4.52 w/2
+ 0.5 4.3 4.52 w/3 + 0.746m 2.0 = 7 1.2m + 8.13 0.8m
m
wLy2
= 33.2375
Segment C:
0.5 10 4.32 w/3 = (10 0.3m) + (10 0.7m)
m
wLy2
= 32.4465
Segment D:
0.5 4.2 5.52 w/3 + 1.5 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 4.3 5.52 w/3
= (10 0.8m) + (10 1.2m) m
wLy2
= 30.515
Average m
wLy2
= 32.3641
0.7
m
0.3
m
0.8 m
1.2 m
105
106
4.17. CONTINUOUS SLAB (C.S) (Refer Fig. 4.12)
= 0.3, = 0.2
r = 1.0
= 0.5, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 32.41597
r1 = 2.2 c1 = 4.5
r2 = 2.3333 c2 = 4.3
r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5
Failure Pattern: 2
Segmental Equilibrium method:
Q1 = 2.5/2.5 1.2m = 1.2m
Segment A:
22 2.5 w/2 + 0.5 2.5 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3)w
+ 0.5 5.5 4.52 w/3 1.2m 2.0 = 8 0.3m + 8 0.7m
m
wLy2
= 32.0823
Segment B:
0.5 2.5 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3) w + 1.5 22 w/2 + 1.2 4.52 w/2
+ 0.5 4.3 4.52 w/3 + 1.2m 2 = 7 0.8m + 8 1.2m
m
wLy2
= 33.2324
Segment C:
0.5 10 4.32 w/3 = (10 0.7m) + (10 0.3m)
m
wLy2
= 32.4499
Segment D:
0.5 4.5 5.52 w/3 + 1.2 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 4.3 5.52 w/3
= 10 1.2m + 10 0.8m m
wLy2
= 31.9915
Average m
wLy2
= 32.4390
0.3
m
0.7
m
1.2 m
0.8 m
107
108
4.18. TWO ADJACENT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.A.C) (Refer Fig. 4.13)
= 0.1, = 0.3
r = 1.0
= 0.667, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients
m
wLy2
= 31.97596
r1 = 2.13 c1 = 4.7
r2 = 2.58495 c2 = 3.9
r3 = 1.71 c3 = 5.8
Failure Pattern: 3
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 4.566/3.7 0.8m = 0.987m
Segment A:
0.5 4.566 3.7 (1 + 3.7/3) w + 2.8 12 w/2
+ 0.5 4.2 4.72 w/3 + 0.987m 1 = 7 0.8m + 8.766 0.8m
m
wLy2
= 32.5396
Segment B:
0.5 3.7 4.566 (1.234 + 4.566/3) w + 3.7 1.2342 w/2 + 1.4 5.82
w/2
+ 0.5 5.82 3.9 w/3 0.987m 1.234 = 9 1.2m + 9 1.2m
m
wLy2
= 31.9081
Segment C:
0.5 10 3.92 w/3 = (10 0.8m)
m
wLy2
= 31.5581
Segment D:
0.5 4.7 4.22 w/3 + 1.4 4.22 w/2 + 0.5 3.9 4.22 w/3
= (10 1.2m) m
wLy2
= 31.8877
Average m
wLy2
= 31.9733
0.8
m
0.8
m
1.2 m
1.2 m
109
110
4.19. TWO ADJACENT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.A.C) (Refer Fig. 4.14)
= 0.1, = 0.3
r = 1.0
= 0.667, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 28.88849
r1 = 2.03 c1 = 4.9
r2 = 2.87087 c2 = 3.5
r3 = 1.71 c3 = 5.8
Failure Pattern: 3
Segmental Equilibrium method:
Q1 = 4.616/3.9 0.6m = 0.71m
Segment A:
2.8 12 w/2 + 0.5 4.616 3.9 (1 + 3.9/3)w
+ 0.5 4.2 4.92 w/3 + 0.71m 1 = 7 1.0m + 8.816 0.6m
m
wLy2
= 29.7601
Segment B:
0.5 4.616 3.9 (1.184 + 4.616/3) w + 3.9 1.842 w/2 + 1.6 5.82
w/2
+ 0.5 3.5 5.82 w/3 0.71m 1.184 = 9 1.4m + 9 1.0m
m
wLy2
= 28.9018
Segment C:
0.5 10 3.52 w/3 = (10 0.6m)
m
wLy2
= 29.3877
Segment D:
0.5 4.9 4.22 w/3 + 1.6 4.22 w/2 + 0.5 3.5 4.22 w/3
= (10 1.0m) m
wLy2
= 25.7678
Average m
wLy2
= 28.4544
1.0
m
0.6
m
1.0 m
1.4 m
111
112
4.20. TWO ADJACENT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.A.C) (Refer Fig. 4.15)
= 0.1, = 0.3
r = 1.0
= 0.667, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 34.93547
r1 = 2.23 c1 = 4.5
r2 = 2.41301 c2 = 4.1
r3 = 1.810 c3 = 5.5
Failure Pattern: 3
Segmental Equilibrium method:
Q1 = 4.278/3.5 1m = 1.222m
Segment A:
0.5 4.278 3.5 (1 + 3.5/3) w + 2.5 12 w/2
+ 0.5 4.5 4.52 w/3 + 1.222m 1 = = 7 0.6m + 8.778 1.0m
m
wLy2
= 35.997
Segment B:
0.5 3.5 4.278 (1.222 + 4.278/3) w + 3.5 1.2222 w/2 + 1.4 5.52
w/2
+ 0.5 4.1 5.52 w/3 1.222m 1.222 = 9 1.0m + 9 1.4m
m
wLy2
= 35.9242
Segment C:
0.5 10 4.12 w/3 = (10 1.0m)
m
wLy2
= 35.693
Segment D:
0.5 4.5 4.52 w/3 + 1.4 4.52 w/2 + 0.5 4.1 4.52 w/3
= (10 1.4m) m
wLy2
= 32.4074
Average m
wLy2
= 35.0054
0.6
m
1.0
m
1.4 m
1.0 m
113
114
4.21. ONE SHORT EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.D) (Refer Fig. 4.16)
= 0.3, = 0.2
r = 1.0
= 0.5, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients
m
wLy2
= 38.02753
r1 = 2.1 c1 = 4.8
r2 = 3.10909 c2 = 3.2
r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5
Patterns: 2
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 2.67/2.5 1.33m = 1.4204m
Segment A:
0.5 2.5 2.67 (2.13 + 2.67/3)w + 2.5 2.132 w/2
+ 0.5 5.5 4.82 w/3 1.4204m 2.13
= 8 0.67m + 8 0.67m m
wLy2
= 37.2804
Segment B:
0.5 2.67 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3) w + 1.8 22 w/2 + 2 4.52 w/2
+ 0.5 3.2 4.52 w/3 + 1.4204m 2
= 7 1.33m + 7.87 1.33m m
wLy2
= 38.3989
Segment C:
0.5 10 3.22 w/3 = (10 0.67m)
m
wLy2
= 39.2577
Segment D:
0.5 4.8 5.52 w/3 + 2 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 3.2 5.52 w/3
= (10 1.33m) + (10 1.33m) m
wLy2
= 37.6877
Average m
wLy2
= 38.1562
0.6
7 m
0.6
7 m
1.33 m
1.33 m
115
116
4.22. ONE SHORT EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.D) (Refer Fig. 4.17)
= 0.3, = 0.2
r = 1.0
= 0.5, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 34.58847
r1 = 2.1 c1 = 4.8
r2 = 4.20909 c2 = 2.4
r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5
Patterns: 2
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 2.67/2.5 1.0m = 1.068m
Segment A:
0.5 2.5 2.67 (2.13 + 2.67/3)w + 2.5 2.132 w/2
+ 0.5 5.5 4.82 w/3 1.068m 2.13
= 8 0.33m + 8 1.0m m
wLy2
= 35.0278
Segment B:
0.5 2.67 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3) w + 1.8 22 w/2 + 2.8 4.52 w/2
+ 0.5 2.4 4.52 w/3 + 1.068m 2
= 7 1.67m + 7.87 1.0m m
wLy2
= 35.1956
Segment C:
0.5 10 2.42 w/3 = (10 0.33m)
m
wLy2
= 34.3750
Segment D:
0.5 4.8 5.52 w/3 + 2.8 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 2.4 5.52 w/3
= (10 1.0m) + (10 1.67m) m
wLy2
= 33.9479
Average m
wLy2
= 34.6366
1.0
m
0.3
3 m
1.0 m
1.67 m
117
118
4.23. ONE SHORT EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.D) (Refer Fig. 4.18)
= 0.3, = 0.2
r = 1.0
= 0.5, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 40.91521
r1 = 2.2 c1 = 4.5
r2 = 2.6333 c2 = 3.8
r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5
Failure Pattern: 2
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 2.5/2.5 1.67m = 1.67m
Segment A:
0.5 2.5 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3) w + 2.5 22 w/2
+ 0.5 5.5 4.52 w/3 1.67m 2 = 8 1.0m + 8 0.33m
m
wLy2
= 40.1261
Segment B:
0.5 2.5 2.5 (2+2.5/3) w + 1.5 22 w/2 + 1.7 4.52 w/3
+ 0.5 3.8 4.52 w/3 + 1.67m 2 = 7 1.0m + 8 1.67m
m
wLy2
= 43.0763
Segment C:
0.5 10 3.82 w/3 = (10 1.0m)
m
wLy2
= 41.5455
Segment D:
0.5 4.5 5.52 w/3 + 1.7 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 3.8 5.52 w/3
= (10 1.67m) + (10 1.0m) m
wLy2
= 39.5214
Average m
wLy2
= 41.0673
0.3
3 m
1.0
m
1.67 m
1.0 m
119
120
4.24. ONE LONG EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.D) (Refer Fig. 4.19)
= 0.4, = 0.3
r = 1.0
= 0.667, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients
m
wLy2
= 26.75861
r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 5.0
r3 = 1.98147 c3 = 5.0
r4 = 2.21888 c4 = 4.5
Failure Pattern: 9
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 2/2 0.9m = 0.9m
Segment A:
2 32 w/2 + 0.5 2 2 (3 + 2/3) w + 0.5 52 w/2
+ 0.5 4.5 52 w/3 0.9m 3 = 7 0.6m + 7 0.6m
m
wLy2
= 26.8549
Segment B:
0.5 2 2 (3 + 2/3) w + 1 32 w/2 + 0.5 5 52 w/3
+ 0.9m 3 = 6 0.9m + 7 0.9m
m
wLy2
= 27.5507
Segment C:
0.5 5 52 w/3 + 0.5 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.5 52 w/3
= 10 0.6m + 10 0.6m m
wLy2
= 26.1837
Segment D:
0.5 10 4.52 w/3
= 10 0.9m m
wLy2
= 26.6667
Average m
wLy2
= 26.8140
0.6
m
0.6
m
0.9 m
0.9 m
121
122
4.25. ONE LONG EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.D) (Refer Fig. 4.20)
= 0.4, = 0.3
r = 1.0
= 0.667, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 24.27114
r1 = 2.1111 c1 = 4.7
r3 = 1.8148 c3 = 5.5
r4 = 2.62729 c4 = 3.8
Failure Pattern: 9
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 2.136/2.5 0.6m = 0.513m
Segment A:
2.5 2.5642 w/2 + 0.5 2.5 2.136 (2.564 + 2.136/3) w + 0.7 4.72
w/2
+ 0.5 3.8 4.72 w/3 0.513m 2.564 = 7 0.7m + 7 0.5m
m
wLy2
= 25.1130
Segment B:
0.5 2.136 2.5 (3 + 2.5/3) w + 0.7 32 w/2 + 0.5 5.3 5.52 w/3
+ 0.513m 3 = 6 1.2m + 7.436 0.6m
m
wLy2
= 25.2397
Segment C:
0.5 5.5 5.32 w/3 + 0.7 5.32 w/2 + 0.5 3.8 5.32 w/3
= 10 0.7m + 10 0.5m m
wLy2
= 22.4841
Segment D:
0.5 10 3.82 w/3
= 10 0.6m m
wLy2
= 24.9273
Average m
wLy2
= 24.4410
0.7
m
0.5
m
0.6 m
1.2 m
123
124
4.26. ONE LONG EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.D) (Refer Fig. 4.21)
= 0.4, = 0.3
r = 1.0
= 0.667, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 28.89752
r1 = 1.8111 c1 = 5.5
r3 = 2.4148 c3 = 4.1
r4 = 2.00681 c4 = 5.0
Failure Pattern: 9
Segmental equilibrium method:
Segment A:
0.5 1.1 1.5 (4 + 1.5/3) w + 0.9 5.52 w/2
+ 0.5 5 5.52 w/3 = 7 0.7m + 7 0.5m
m
wLy2
= 19.7508
Segment B:
0.5 1.5 1.1 (3+1.1/3) w + 1.5 32 w/2 + 0.5 4.5 4.12 w/3
= 6 1.2m + 6 0.6m
m
wLy2
= 48.7915
Segment C:
0.5 4.1 4.52 w/3 + 0.9 4.52 w/2 + 0.5 5 4.52 w/3
= 10 0.7m + 10 0.5m
m
wLy2
= 30.1318
Segment D:
0.5 10 52 w/3
= (10 1.2m) m
wLy2
= 28.7977
Average m
wLy2
= 31.8915
0.5
m
0.7
m
1.2 m
0.6 m
125
126
4.27. ONE SHORT EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.22)
= 0.3, = 0.1
r = 1.0
= 1.0, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients
m
wLy2
= 29.43841
r1 = 1.80 c1 = 5.6
r2 = 2.55 c2 = 3.9
r3 = 2.10 c3 = 4.8
Failure Pattern: 2
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 4.433/3.8 1.5m = 1.75m
Segment A:
0.5 3.8 4.433 (1.167 + 4.433/3) w + 3.8 1.1672 w/2
+ 0.5 5.2 5.62 w/3 1.75m 1.167 = 9 0.75m + 9 0.75m
m
wLy2
= 29.8652
Segment B:
0.5 4.433 3.8 (1 + 3.8/3) w + 2.6 12 w/2 + 0.5 4.82 w/2
+ 0.5 3.9 4.82 w/3 + 1.75m 1 = 8.833 1.5m
m
wLy2
= 27.9607
Segment C:
0.5 10 3.92 w/3 = (10 0.75m)
m
wLy2
= 29.5857
Segment D:
0.5 5.6 5.22 w/3 + 0.5 5.22 w/2 + 0.5 3.9 5.22 w/3
= (10 1.5m) m
wLy2
= 30.2582
Average m
wLy2
= 29.4174
0.7
5 m
0.7
5 m
1.5 m
127
128
4.28. ONE SHORT EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.23)
= 0.3, = 0.1
r = 1.0
= 1.0, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 27.40698
r1 = 1.7 c1 = 5.9
r2 = 3.02857 c2 = 3.3
r3 = 2.10 c3 = 4.8
Failure Patterns: 2
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 4.671/3.8 1.5m = 1.844m
Segment A:
0.5 3.8 4.671 (1.229 + 4.671/3) w + 3.8 1.2292 w/2
+ 0.5 5.2 5.92 w/3 1.844m 1.229 = 9 1.0m + 9 0.5m
m
wLy2
= 27.2944
Segment B:
0.5 4.671 3.8 (1 + 3.8/3) w + 2.9 12 w/2 + 0.8 4.82 w/2
+ 0.5 3.3 4.82 w/3 + 1.844m 1 = 8.771 1.5m
m
wLy2
= 26.033
Segment C:
0.5 10 3.32 w/3 = (10 0.5m)
m
wLy2
= 27.5482
Segment D:
0.5 5.9 5.22 w/3 + 0.8 5.22 w/2 + 0.5 3.3 5.22 w/3
= (10 1.5m) m
wLy2
= 28.6931
Average m
wLy2
= 27.3922
1.0
m
0.5
m
1.5 m
129
130
4.29. ONE SHORT EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.24)
= 0.3, = 0.1
r = 1.0
= 1.0, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 31.23402
r1 = 1.8111 c1 = 5.5
r3 = 2.1333 c3 = 4.7
r4 = 1.88238 c4 = 5.3
Failure Pattern: 9
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 4.33/3.7 1.5m = 1.755m
Segment A:
0.5 3.7 4.33 (1.17 + 4.33/3) w + 3.7 1.172 w/2
+ 0.5 5.3 5.52 w/3 1.755m 1.17 = 9 0.5m + 9 1.0m
m
wLy2
= 30.9906
Segment B:
0.5 4.33 3.7 (1 + 3.7/3) w + 2.5 12 w/2 + 0.5 4.5 4.72 w/3
+ 1.755m 1 = 8.83 1.5m
m
wLy2
= 32.1780
Segment C:
0.5 10 4.52 w/3 = (10 1.0m)
m
wLy2
= 29.6296
Segment D:
0.5 10 5.32 w/3
= (10 1.5m) m
wLy2
= 32.0398
Average m
wLy2
= 31.2095
0.5
m
1.0
m
1.5 m
131
132
4.30. ONE LONG EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.25)
= 0.2, = 0.1
r = 1.2
= 1.0, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients
m
wLy2
= 31.95957
r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 6.0
r3 = 1.8222 c3 = 5.5
r4 = 2.31625 c4 = 4.3
Failure Pattern: 9
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 4.909/4.5 1m = 1.091m
Segment A:
0.5 4.5 4.909 (1.091 + 4.909/3) w + 4.5 1.0912 w/2 + 0.2 62
w/2
+ 0.5 4.3 62 w/3 1.091m 1.091 = 9 2.0m
m
wLy2
= 30.8514
Segment B:
0.5 4.909 4.5 (1 + 4.5/3) w + 3.6 12 w/2 + 0.5 6 5.52 w/3
+ 1.091m 1 = 9.6 1.0m + 10.909 1.0m
m
wLy2
= 32.5461
Segment C:
0.5 5.5 62 w/3 + 0.2 62 w/2 + 0.5 4.3 62 w/3
= 10 2.0m m
wLy2
= 32.0513
Segment D:
0.5 12 4.32 w/3
= 12 1.0m m
wLy2
= 32.45
Average m
wLy2
= 31.9747
2.0
m
1.0 m
1.0 m
133
134
4.31. ONE LONG EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.26)
= 0.2, = 0.1
r = 1.2
= 1.0, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 27.81781
r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 6.0
r3 = 1.7222 c3 = 5.8
r4 = 3.08465 c4 = 3.2
Failure Pattern: 9
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 4.966/4.8 0.5m = 0.517m
Segment A:
0.5 4.8 4.966 (1.034 + 4.966/3) w + 4.8 1.0342 w/2
+ 1 62 w/2 + 0.5 3.2 62 w/3 0.517m 1.034
= 9 2.0m m
wLy2
= 25.8075
Segment B:
0.5 4.966 4.8 (1 + 4.8/3) w + 3.6 12 w/2 + 0.5 6 5.82 w/3
+ 0.517m 1 = 9.6 1.5m + 10.966 0.5m
m
wLy2
= 29.15351
Segment C:
0.5 5.8 62 w/3 + 1 62 w/2 + 0.5 3.2 62 w/3
= 10 2.0m m
wLy2
= 27.7778
Segment D:
0.5 12 3.22 w/3
= 12 0.5m m
wLy2
= 29.2969
Average m
wLy2
= 28.0089
2.0
m
0.5 m
1.5 m
135
136
4.32. ONE LONG EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.27)
= 0.2, = 0.1
r = 1.2
= 1.0, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 35.50319
r1 = 2.1 c1 = 5.7
r2 = 2.10909 c2 = 5.7
r3 = 2.0 c3 = 5
Failure Pattern: 2
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 4.56/4 1.5m = 1.71m
Segment A:
0.5 4 4.56 (1.14 + 4.56/3) w + 4 1.142 w/2
+ 0.5 5 5.72 w/3 1.71m 1.14 = 9 2.0m
m
wLy2
= 36.9889
Segment B:
0.5 4.56 4 (1 + 4/3) w + 3.3 12 w/2 + 0.6 52 w/2
+ 0.5 5.7 52 w/3 + 1.171m 1 = 9.6 0.5m + 10.86 1.5m
m
wLy2
= 36.7644
Segment C:
0.5 10 5.72 w/3
= 10 2.0m m
wLy2
= 36.9344
Segment D:
0.5 5.7 52 w/3 + 0.6 52 w/2 + 0.5 5.7 52 w/3
= 12 1.5m
` m
wLy2
= 32.7272
Average m
wLy2
= 35.8537
2.0
m
1.5 m
0.5 m
137
138
4.33. TWO SHORT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.28)
= 0.2, = 0.3
r = 1.2
= 1.5, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients
m
wLy2
= 26.72977
r1 = 2.315 c1 = 5.2
r2 = 1.86046 c2 = 6.5
r3 = 2.01 c3 = 5
Failure Pattern: 3
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 2.692/2.8 0.9m = 0.865m
Segment A:
0.5 2.692 2.8 (2.4 + 2.8/3) w + 2 2.42 w/2
+ 0.5 5 5.22 w/3 + 0.865m 2.4
= 7 0.9m + 7.692 0.9m m
wLy2
= 27.2831
Segment B:
0.5 2.8 2.692 (2.308 + 2.692/3) w + 2.8 2.3082 w/2 + 0.3 52
w/2
+ 0.5 6.5 52 w/3 0.865m 2.308 = 9.6 1.2m
m
wLy2
= 26.8336
Segment C:
0.5 10 6.52 w/3
= 10 0.9m + 10 0.9m m
wLy2
= 25.56213
Segment D:
0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 0.3 52 w/2 + 0.5 6.5 52 w/3
= 12 1.2m m
wLy2
= 27.4285
Average m
wLy2
= 26.7769
0.9
m
0.9
m
1.2 m
139
140
4.34. TWO SHORT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.29)
= 0.2, = 0.3
r = 1.2
= 1.5, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 26.69564
r1 = 2.315 c1 = 5.2
r2 = 1.86046 c2 = 6.5
r3 = 2.01 c3 = 5
Failure Patterns: 3
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 2.692/2.8 0.8m = 0.769m
Segment A:
0.5 2.692 2.8 (2.4 + 2.8/3) w + 2 2.42 w/2
+ 0.5 5 5.22 w/3 + 0.769m 2.4
= 7 1.0m + 7.692 0.8m m
wLy2
= 27.6777
Segment B:
0.5 2.8 2.692 (2.308 + 2.692/3) w + 2.8 2.3082 w/2 + 0.3 52
w/2
+ 0.5 6.5 52 w/3 0.769m 2.308
= 9.6 1.2m m
wLy2
= 26.3938
Segment C:
0.5 10 6.52 w/3
= 10 1.0m + 10 0.8m m
wLy2
= 25.5621
Segment D:
0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 0.3 52 w/2 + 0.5 6.5 52 w/3
= 12 1.2m m
wLy2
= 27.4285
Average m
wLy2
= 26.7655
1.0
m
0.8
m
1.2 m
141
142
4.35. TWO SHORT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.30)
= 0.2, = 0.3
r = 1.2
= 1.5, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 26.7639
r1 = 2.315 c1 = 5.2
r2 = 1.86046 c2 = 6.5
r3 = 2.01 c3 = 5
Failure Pattern: 3
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 2.692/2.8 1m = 0.961m
Segment A:
0.5 2.692 2.8 (2.4 + 2.8/3) w + 2 2.42 w/2
+ 0.5 5 5.22 w/3 + 0.961m 2.4
= 7 0.8m + 7.692 1.0m m
wLy2
= 26.8886
Segment B:
0.5 2.8 2.692 (2.308 + 2.692/3) w + 2.8 2.3082 w/2 + 0.3 52
w/2
+ 0.5 6.5 52 w/3 0.961m 2.308 = 9.6 1.2m
m
wLy2
= 27.2735
Segment C:
0.5 10 6.52 w/3
= 10 0.8m + 10 1.0m m
wLy2
= 25.5621
Segment D:
0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 0.3 52 w/2 + 0.5 6.5 52 w/3
= 12 1.2m m
wLy2
= 27.4286
Average m
wLy2
= 26.7882
0.8
m
1.0
m
1.2 m
143
144
4.36. TWO LONG EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.31)
= 0.3, = 0.2
r = 1.2
= 1.5, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients
m
wLy2
= 35.63814
r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 6
r3 = 2.31665 c3 = 4.3
r4 = 1.9595 c4 = 5.1
Failure Pattern: 9
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 3.209/2.3 0.8m = 1.116m
Segment A:
0.5 2.3 3.209 (2.791 + 3.209/3) w + 2.3 2.7912 w/2
+ 0.6 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.1 62 w/3 1.116m 2.791
= 8 2.4m m
wLy2
= 34.54013
Segment B:
0.5 3.209 2.3 (2 + 2.3/3) w + 2.4 22 w/2 + 0.5 6 4.32 w/3
+ 1.116m 2.0 = 8.4 0.8m + 9.209 0.8m
m
wLy2
= 35.3887
Segment C:
0.5 4.3 62 w/3 + 0.6 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.1 62 w/3
= 10 2.4m m
wLy2
= 35.7143
Segment D:
0.5 12 5.12 w/3
= 12 0.8m + 12 0.8m m
wLy2
= 36.9089
Average m
wLy2
= 35.638
2.4
m
0.8 m
0.8 m
145
146
4.37. TWO LONG EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.32)
= 0.3, = 0.2
r = 1.2
= 1.5, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 35.48967
r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 6
r3 = 2.21665 c3 = 4.5
r4 = 1.92193 c4 = 5.2
Failure Pattern: 9
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 3.333/2.5 0.5m = 0.667m
Segment A:
0.5 2.5 3.333 (2.667 + 3.333/3) w + 2.5 2.6672 w/2
+ 0.3 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.2 62 w/3 0.667m 2.667
= 8 2.4m m
wLy2
= 34.26176
Segment B:
0.5 3.333 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3) w + 2.4 22 w/2 + 0.5 6 4.52 w/3
+ 0.667m 2.0 = 8.4 1.1m + 9.333 0.5m
m
wLy2
= 35.1140
Segment C:
0.5 4.5 62 w/3 + 0.3 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.2 62 w/3
= 10 2.4m m
wLy2
= 37.7358
Segment D:
0.5 12 5.22 w/3
= 12 1.1m + 12 0.5m m
wLy2
= 35.5029
Average m
wLy2
= 35.4036
2.4
m
0.5 m
1.1 m
147
148
4.38. TWO LONG EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.33)
= 0.3, = 0.2
r = 1.2
= 1.5, k = 4.0
Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 35.77388
r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 6
r3 = 2.41665 c3 = 4.1
r4 = 1.90589 c4 = 5.2
Failure Patterns: 9
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 3.073/2.1 1.1m = 1.61m
Segment A:
0.5 2.1 3.073 (2.927 + 3.073/3) w + 2.1 2.9272 w/2
+ 0.7 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.2 62 w/3 1.61m 2.927
= 8 2.4m m
wLy2
= 36.4825
Segment B:
0.5 3.073 2.1 (2 + 2.1/3) w + 2.4 22 w/2 + 0.5 6 4.12 w/3
+ 1.61m 2 = 8.4 0.5m + 9.073 1.1m
m
wLy2
= 36.1464
Segment C:
0.5 4.1 62 w/3 + 0.7 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.2 62 w/3
= 10 2.4m m
wLy2
= 35.0877
Segment D:
0.5 12 5.22 w/3
= 12 0.5m + 12 1.1m m
wLy2
= 35.5029
Average m
wLy2
= 35.8049
2.4
m
1.1 m
0.5 m
149
150
4.39. SIMPLY SUPPORTED SLAB (S.S) (Refer Fig. 4.34)
= 0.1, = 0.3
r = 1.2
= 2.0, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients
m
wLy2
= 27.37743
r1 = 2.11111 c1 = 5.7
r3 = 2.10370 c3 = 4.8
r4 = 2.10604 c4 = 4.7
Failure Pattern: 10
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 3.789/4.5 2.0m = 1.684m
Segment A:
0.5 3.789 4.5 (1.2 + 4.5/3) w + 1.8 1.22 w/2
+ 0.5 5.72 w/2 + 0.5 4.7 5.72 w/3 + 1.684m 1.2
= 8.989 2.0m m
wLy2
= 27.5652
Segment B:
0.5 4.5 3.789 (1.011 + 3.789/3) w + 4.5 1.0112 w/2
+ 0.5 6.3 4.82 w/3 1.684m 1.011 = 10.8 1.0m
m
wLy2
= 27.2514
Segment C:
0.5 4.8 6.32 w/3 + 0.5 6.32 w/2 + 0.5 4.7 6.32 w/3
= 10 2.0m m
wLy2
= 27.4857
Segment D:
0.5 12 4.72 w/3
= 12 1.0m m
wLy2
= 27.1616
Average m
wLy2
= 27.3660
2.0
m
1.0 m
151
152
4.40. SIMPLY SUPPORTED SLAB (S.S) (Refer Fig. 4.35)
= 0.1, = 0.3
r = 1.2
= 2.0, k = 3.0
Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients
m
wLy2
= 29.66902
r1 = 3.13 c1 = 3.8
r2 = 2.66948 c2 = 4.5
r3 = 2.01 c3 = 5
Failure Pattern: 3
Segmental equilibrium method:
Q1 = 3.421/2.6 1.0m = 1.316m
Segment A:
0.5 3.421 2.6 (1.2 + 2.6/3) w + 2 1.22 w/2
+ 0.5 5 3.82 w/3 + 1.316m 1.2
= 8.421 1.0m m
wLy2
= 30.1874
Segment B:
0.5 2.6 3.421 (1.579 + 3.421/3) w + 2.6 1.5792 w/2 + 3.7 52
w/2
+ 0.5 52 4.5 w/3 1.316m 1.579 = 10.8 2.0m
m
wLy2
= 29.4740
Segment C:
0.5 10 4.52 w/3
= 10 1.0m m
wLy2
= 29.6296
Segment D:
0.5 3.8 52 w/3 + 3.7 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.5 52 w/3
= 12 2.0m m
wLy2
= 29.6907
Average m
wLy2
= 29.7454
1.0
m
2.0 m
153