010 chapter 4 - INFLIBNETshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12388/10/10_chapter 4.pdf · Various support conditions of slab (Nine edge conditions). In addition to the above,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 80

    CHAPTER 4

    APPLICATION OF WORK EQUATIONS AND THEIR

    PARAMETRIC STUDY

    4.1. Introduction:

    In the last chapter the work equations are derived for corner openings of

    orthogonal slabs and can be applied theoretically to various problems and a

    parametric study on strength of orthogonal slab with openings will be made with the

    following data:

    1. The aspect ratio of slab and opening (r, and respectively).

    2. Location of opening

    3. The Coefficient of Orthotrophy ().

    4. Coefficients of Orthogonal Moments ( 'xK , '

    yK , I1, I2, I3 and I4).

    5. Sum of the Coefficients of Orthogonal Moments (K).

    6. Various support conditions of slab (Nine edge conditions).

    In addition to the above, a comparative study can be made in strengths of

    orthogonal slab with openings with solid slab. The valid admissible governing failure

    pattern can also be found.

    4.2 Importance of choosing different moment coefficients:

    To obtain m

    wLy2

    values the work equations derived in the previous chapter are

    to be evaluated for different parameters given in the section 4.1. The work so for

  • 81

    published by different researchers2,8,11,14,17

    predominantly concludes that the value of

    m

    wLy2

    mainly depends on the selection of orthogonal moment coefficients ( 'xK ,

    '

    yK ,

    I1, I2, I3 and I4), coefficient of orthotropy () and sum of orthogonal moment

    coefficients (K) for a given specific problem. Hence the author has chosen three

    different varieties of orthogonal moment coefficients, one basing on affined theorm3,14

    and other two basing on individual designers choice as given in appendix 1.

    4.3 Segment Equilibrium Method:

    To verify the value obtained by using virtual work method, the segment

    equilibrium method has been used for various problems of slabs with and without

    opening for various parameters mentioned in section 4.1. To solve a slab by

    equilibrium method, the steps suggested by Park, R. and W.L. Gamble14

    are followed.

    The section below gives a comparative study of virtual work and segment equilibrium

    method for a solid slab.

    4.4 Shifting of failure patterns in solid slab:

    Problem 4.1: A continuous solid slab whose aspect ratio is 1.2, is provided

    with following orthogonal moment coefficients as given below. (Refer article 4.6)

    '

    xK = 0.33, '

    yK = 1.0, I1(I3) = 1.0, I2(I4) = 1.67, K = 4.0, = 0.5 (designers choice

    coefficients)

    Problem 4.2: A two adjacent edges continuous solid slab whose aspect ratio is

    1.2, is provided with following orthogonal moment coefficients as given below.

    (Refer article 4.7)

  • 82

    '

    xK = 0.9, '

    yK = 0.5, I1(I3) = 1.5, I2(I4) = 1.1, K = 4.0, = 1.5 (designers

    choice coefficients)

    The solutions obtained by computer programme and segmental equilibrium

    method are shown in the following pages.

    The solution of these two problems clearly indicate that the choice of selecting

    orthogonal moment coefficients is very much essential in order to have the desired

    strength and failure pattern. Shifting of failure patterns in solid slab for other edge

    conditions (O.S.D, O.L.D, O.S.C, O.L.C, T.S.C, T.L.C, S.S) are explained in the

    Article Nos. 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14. The same idea has been extended

    to slabs with corner openings.

    4.5 Shifting of failure patterns in slab with corner opening:

    Problem 4.3: A continuous solid slab whose aspect ratio is 1.0, is provided

    with three different sets of orthogonal moment coefficients as given below. (Refer

    Article Nos. 4.15, 4.16 and 4.17)

    Set 1: 'x

    K = 0.5, '

    yK = 1.0, I1(I3) = 0.5, I2(I4) = 1.0, K = 3.0, = 0.5 (affine theorem

    coefficients)

    Set 2: 'x

    K = 0.3, '

    yK = 0.8, I1(I3) = 0.7, I2(I4) = 1.2, K = 3.0, = 0.5 (designers

    choice coefficients)

    Set 3: 'x

    K = 0.7, '

    yK = 1.2, I1(I3) = 0.3, I2(I4) = 0.8, K = 3.0, = 0.5 (designers

    choice coefficients reversed)

  • 83

    Problem 4.4: A two adjacent edges continuous solid slab whose aspect ratio is

    1.0, is provided with following orthogonal moment coefficients as given below.

    (Refer Article Nos. 4.18, 4.19 and 4.20)

    Set 1: 'x

    K = 0.8, 'y

    K = 1.2, I1(I3) = 0.8, I2(I4) = 1.2, K = 4.0, = 0.667 (affine theorem

    coefficients)

    Set 2: 'x

    K = 0.6, '

    yK = 1, I1(I3) = 1, I2(I4) = 1.4, K = 4.0, = 1.0 (designers choice

    coefficients)

    Set 3: 'x

    K = 1.0, '

    yK = 1.4, I1(I3) = 0.6, I2(I4) = 1.0, K = 4.0, = 0.667 (designers

    choice coefficients reversed)

    The solutions obtained by computer programme and segmental equilibrium

    method are shown in the following pages.

    The solution of these two problems clearly indicate that the choice of selecting

    orthogonal moment coefficients is very much essential in order to have the desired

    strength and failure pattern. Shifting of failure patterns in slab with corner opening

    for other edge conditions of the slab (O.S.D, O.L.D, O.S.C, O.L.C, T.S.C, T.L.C and

    S.S) are explained in the Article Nos. 4.21, 4.22, 4.23, 4.24, 4.25, 4.26, 4.27, 4.28,

    4.29, 4.30, 4.31, 4.32, 4.33, 4.34, 4.35, 4.36, 4.37, 4.38, 4.39 and 4.40 respectively.

  • 84

    4.6. CONTINUOUS SLAB (C.S.) (Refer Fig. 4.1)

    r = 1.2

    = 0.5, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 41.60588

    r1 = 2.73986 c1 = 4.4

    r2 = 2.73986 c2 = 4.4

    r3 = 2.00 c3 = 5.0

    Failure Pattern: I

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Segment A:

    0.5 10 4.42 w/3

    = 10 0.33m + 10 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 41.21

    Segment B:

    0.5 4.4 52 w/3 + 3.2 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.4 52 w/3

    = 12 1.0m + 12 1.67m m

    wLy2

    = 41.78

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 4.42 w/3

    = 10 0.33m + 10 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 41.21

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.4 52 w/3 + 3.2 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.4 52 w/3

    = 12 1.0m + 12 1.67m m

    wLy2

    = 41.78

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 41.50

    1.0

    m

    0.3

    3 m

    1.0 m

    1.67 m

  • 85

  • 86

    4.7. TWO ADJACENT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.A.C.) (Refer Fig. 4.2)

    r = 1.2

    = 1.5, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 24.65619

    r1 = 1.61237 c1 = 7.44

    r3 = 1.59987 c3 = 6.3

    r4 = 2.86704 c4 = 3.5

    Failure Pattern: 2

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Segment A:

    0.5 3.5 7.442 w/3 + 0.20 7.442 w/2 + 0.5 6.3 7.442 w/3

    = 10 0.9m + 10 1.5m m

    wLy2

    = 25.0140

    Segment B:

    0.5 12 6.32 w/3

    = 12 0.5m + 12 1.1m m

    wLy2

    = 24.1875

    Segment C:

    0.5 6.3 4.562 w/3 + 0.20 4.562 w/2 + 0.5 3.5 4.562 w/3

    = 10 0.9m m

    wLy2

    = 24.9707

    Segment D:

    0.5 12 3.52 w/3

    = 12 0.5m m

    wLy2

    = 24.4898

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 24.6655

    1.5

    m

    0.9

    m

    0.5 m

    1.1 m

  • 87

  • 88

    4.8. ONE SHORT EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.D.) (Refer Fig. 4.3)

    r = 1.2

    = 0.667, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 35.80807

    r1 = 2.31844 c1 = 5.2

    r2 = 3.78986 c2 = 3.2

    r3 = 2.00 c3 = 5.0

    Failure Pattern: I

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Segment A:

    0.5 10 5.22 w/3

    = 10 0.6m + 10 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 35.50

    Segment B:

    0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 3.6 52 w/2 + 0.5 3.2 52 w/3

    = 12 1.0m + 12 1.4m m

    wLy2

    = 36.0

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 3.22 w/3

    = 10 0.6m m

    wLy2

    = 35.15

    Segment D:

    0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 3.6 52 w/2 + 0.5 3.2 52 w/3

    = 12 1.0m + 12 1.4m m

    wLy2

    = 36.0

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 35.6625

    1.0

    m

    0.6

    m

    1.0 m

    1.4 m

  • 89

  • 90

    4.9. ONE LONG EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.D) (Refer Fig. 4.4)

    r = 1.2

    = 1.0, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 31.01776

    r1 = 2.0 c1 = 6.0

    r3 = 1.60987 c3 = 6.2

    r4 = 2.9397 c4 = 3.4

    Failure Pattern: 2

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Segment A:

    0.5 3.4 62 w/3 + 0.4 62 w/2 + 0.5 6.2 62 w/3

    = 10 0.5m + 10 1.5m m

    wLy2

    = 30.8642

    Segment B:

    0.5 12 6.22 w/3

    = 12 0.6m + 12 1.4m m

    wLy2

    = 31.2175

    Segment C:

    0.5 6.2 62 w/3 + 0.4 62 w/2 + 0.5 3.4 62 w/3

    = 10 0.5m + 10 1.5m m

    wLy2

    = 30.8642

    Segment D:

    0.5 12 3.42 w/3

    = 12 0.6m m

    wLy2

    = 31.1419

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 31.0219

    1.5

    m

    0.5

    m

    0.6 m

    1.4 m

  • 91

  • 92

    4.10. ONE SHORT EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.5)

    r = 1.2

    = 0.667, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 35.09861

    r1 = 2.29259 c1 = 5.2

    r2 = 4.09986 c2 = 2.9

    r3 = 2.00 c3 = 5

    Failure Pattern : 1

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Segment A:

    0.5 10 5.22 w/3

    = 10 0.5m + 10 1.1m m

    wLy2

    = 35.5029

    Segment B:

    0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 3.9 52 w/2 + 0.5 2.9 52 w/3

    = 12 2.4m m

    wLy2

    = 34.9091

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 2.92 w/3

    = 10 0.5m m

    wLy2

    = 35.6717

    Segment D:

    0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 3.9 52 w/2 + 0.5 2.9 52 w/3

    = 12 2.4m m

    wLy2

    = 34.9091

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 35.2482

    1.1

    m

    0.5

    m

    2.4 m

  • 93

  • 94

    4.11. ONE LONG EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.C.) (Refer Fig. 4.6)

    r = 1.2

    = 0.667, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 29.49768

    r1 = 2.09920 c1 = 5.7

    r2 = 2.09920 c2 = 5.7

    r3 = 1.5 c3 = 6.67

    Failure Pattern : 1

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Segment A:

    0.5 10 5.72 w/3

    = 10 1.6m m

    wLy2

    = 29.5476

    Segment B:

    0.5 5.7 6.672 w/3 + 0.60 6.672 w/2 + 0.5 5.7 6.672 w/3

    = 12 0.6m + 12 1.8m m

    wLy2

    = 29.4251

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 5.72 w/3

    = 10 1.6m m

    wLy2

    = 29.5476

    Segment D:

    0.5 5.7 3.332 w/3 + 0.60 3.332 w/2 + 0.5 5.7 3.332 w/3

    = 12 0.6m m

    wLy2

    = 29.5135

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 29.5085

    1.6

    m

    0.6 m

    1.8 m

  • 95

  • 96

    4.12. TWO SHORT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.7)

    r = 1.2

    = 0.5, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 41.70639

    r1 = 2.72808 c1 = 4.4

    r2 = 2.72808 c2 = 4.4

    r3 = 2.0 c3 = 5.0

    Failure Pattern : 1

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Segment A:

    0.5 10 4.42 w/3

    = 10 0.54m + 10 0.8m m

    wLy2

    = 41.5246

    Segment B:

    0.5 4.40 52 w/3 + 3.20 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.40 52 w/3

    = 12 2.67m m

    wLy2

    = 41.7895

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 4.402 w/3

    = 10 0.54m + 10 0.8m m

    wLy2

    = 41.5246

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.40 52 w/3 + 3.20 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.40 52 w/3

    = 12 2.67m m

    wLy2

    = 41.7895

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 41.6571

    0.8

    m

    0.5

    4 m

    2.67 m

  • 97

  • 98

    4.13. TWO LONG EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.8)

    r = 1.2

    = 1.5, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 39.19795

    r1 = 2.0 c1 = 6

    r3 = 2.01986 c3 = 4.9

    r4 = 2.01986 c4 = 4.9

    Failure Pattern : 2

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Segment A:

    0.5 4.90 62 w/3 + 0.2 62 w/2 + 0.5 4.90 62 w/3

    = 10 2.4m m

    wLy2

    = 38.4615

    Segment B:

    0.5 12 4.902 w/3

    = 12 0.5m + 12 1.1m m

    wLy2

    = 39.9833

    Segment C:

    0.5 4.90 62 w/3 + 0.2 62 w/2 + 0.5 4.90 62 w/3

    = 10 2.4m m

    wLy2

    = 38.4615

    Segment D:

    0.5 12 4.902 w/3

    = 12 0.5m + 12 1.1m m

    wLy2

    = 39.9833

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 39.2224

    2.4

    m

    0.5 m

    1.1 m

  • 99

  • 100

    4.14. SIMPLY SUPPORTED SLAB (S.S) (Refer Fig. 4.9)

    r = 1.2

    = 0.5, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 41.60588

    r1 = 2.73986 c1 = 4.4

    r2 = 2.73986 c2 = 4.4

    r3 = 2.0 c3 = 5

    Failure Pattern : 1

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Segment A:

    0.5 10 4.42 w/3

    = 10 1.33m m

    wLy2

    = 41.2148

    Segment B:

    0.5 4.4 52 w/3 + 3.2 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.4 52 w/3

    = 12 2.67m m

    wLy2

    = 41.7895

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 4.42 w/3

    = 10 1.33m m

    wLy2

    = 41.2148

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.4 52 w/3 + 3.2 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.4 52 w/3

    = 12 2.67m m

    wLy2

    = 41.7895

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 41.5022

    1.3

    3 m

    2.67 m

  • 101

  • 102

    4.15. CONTINUOUS SLAB (C.S) (Refer Fig. 4.10)

    = 0.3, = 0.2 r = 1.0

    = 0.5, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 32.28133

    r1 = 2.3 c1 = 4.4

    r2 = 2.36923 c2 = 4.2

    r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5

    Failure Pattern: 2

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 2.44/2.5 1.0m = 0.976m

    Segment A:

    2.5 1.962 w/2 + 0.5 2.5 2.44 (1.96 + 2.44/3)w

    + 0.5 5.5 4.42 w/3 0.976m 1.96 = 8 0.5m + 8 0.5m

    m

    wLy2

    = 31.9699

    Segment B:

    0.5 2.44 2.5 (2+2.5/3) w + (4.4 3) 22 w/2 + 1.4 4.52 w/2

    + 0.5 4.2 4.52 w/3 + 0.976m 2 = 7 1.0m + 8.04 1.0m

    m

    wLy2

    = 32.8914

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 4.22 w/3 = (10 0.5m) + (10 0.5m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 34.01

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.4 5.52 w/3 + 1.4 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 4.2 5.52 w/3

    = 10 1.0m + 10 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 30.99

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 32.4653

    0.5

    m

    0.5

    m

    1.0 m

    1.0 m

  • 103

  • 104

    4.16. CONTINUOUS SLAB (C.S) (Refer Fig. 4.11)

    = 0.3, = 0.2

    r = 1.0

    = 0.5, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 32.14192

    r1 = 2.4 c1 = 4.2

    r2 = 2.31429 c2 = 4.3

    r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5

    Failure Pattern: 2

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 2.33/2.5 0.8m = 0.746m

    Segment A:

    2.5 1.872 w/2 + 0.5 2.5 2.33 (1.87 + 2.33/3)w

    + 0.5 5.5 4.22 w/3 0.746m 1.87 = 8 0.3m + 8 0.7m

    m

    wLy2

    = 33.2573

    Segment B:

    0.5 2.33 2.5 (2+2.5/3) w + 1.2 22 w/2 + 1.5 4.52 w/2

    + 0.5 4.3 4.52 w/3 + 0.746m 2.0 = 7 1.2m + 8.13 0.8m

    m

    wLy2

    = 33.2375

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 4.32 w/3 = (10 0.3m) + (10 0.7m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 32.4465

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.2 5.52 w/3 + 1.5 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 4.3 5.52 w/3

    = (10 0.8m) + (10 1.2m) m

    wLy2

    = 30.515

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 32.3641

    0.7

    m

    0.3

    m

    0.8 m

    1.2 m

  • 105

  • 106

    4.17. CONTINUOUS SLAB (C.S) (Refer Fig. 4.12)

    = 0.3, = 0.2

    r = 1.0

    = 0.5, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 32.41597

    r1 = 2.2 c1 = 4.5

    r2 = 2.3333 c2 = 4.3

    r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5

    Failure Pattern: 2

    Segmental Equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 2.5/2.5 1.2m = 1.2m

    Segment A:

    22 2.5 w/2 + 0.5 2.5 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3)w

    + 0.5 5.5 4.52 w/3 1.2m 2.0 = 8 0.3m + 8 0.7m

    m

    wLy2

    = 32.0823

    Segment B:

    0.5 2.5 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3) w + 1.5 22 w/2 + 1.2 4.52 w/2

    + 0.5 4.3 4.52 w/3 + 1.2m 2 = 7 0.8m + 8 1.2m

    m

    wLy2

    = 33.2324

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 4.32 w/3 = (10 0.7m) + (10 0.3m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 32.4499

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.5 5.52 w/3 + 1.2 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 4.3 5.52 w/3

    = 10 1.2m + 10 0.8m m

    wLy2

    = 31.9915

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 32.4390

    0.3

    m

    0.7

    m

    1.2 m

    0.8 m

  • 107

  • 108

    4.18. TWO ADJACENT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.A.C) (Refer Fig. 4.13)

    = 0.1, = 0.3

    r = 1.0

    = 0.667, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 31.97596

    r1 = 2.13 c1 = 4.7

    r2 = 2.58495 c2 = 3.9

    r3 = 1.71 c3 = 5.8

    Failure Pattern: 3

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 4.566/3.7 0.8m = 0.987m

    Segment A:

    0.5 4.566 3.7 (1 + 3.7/3) w + 2.8 12 w/2

    + 0.5 4.2 4.72 w/3 + 0.987m 1 = 7 0.8m + 8.766 0.8m

    m

    wLy2

    = 32.5396

    Segment B:

    0.5 3.7 4.566 (1.234 + 4.566/3) w + 3.7 1.2342 w/2 + 1.4 5.82

    w/2

    + 0.5 5.82 3.9 w/3 0.987m 1.234 = 9 1.2m + 9 1.2m

    m

    wLy2

    = 31.9081

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 3.92 w/3 = (10 0.8m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 31.5581

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.7 4.22 w/3 + 1.4 4.22 w/2 + 0.5 3.9 4.22 w/3

    = (10 1.2m) m

    wLy2

    = 31.8877

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 31.9733

    0.8

    m

    0.8

    m

    1.2 m

    1.2 m

  • 109

  • 110

    4.19. TWO ADJACENT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.A.C) (Refer Fig. 4.14)

    = 0.1, = 0.3

    r = 1.0

    = 0.667, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 28.88849

    r1 = 2.03 c1 = 4.9

    r2 = 2.87087 c2 = 3.5

    r3 = 1.71 c3 = 5.8

    Failure Pattern: 3

    Segmental Equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 4.616/3.9 0.6m = 0.71m

    Segment A:

    2.8 12 w/2 + 0.5 4.616 3.9 (1 + 3.9/3)w

    + 0.5 4.2 4.92 w/3 + 0.71m 1 = 7 1.0m + 8.816 0.6m

    m

    wLy2

    = 29.7601

    Segment B:

    0.5 4.616 3.9 (1.184 + 4.616/3) w + 3.9 1.842 w/2 + 1.6 5.82

    w/2

    + 0.5 3.5 5.82 w/3 0.71m 1.184 = 9 1.4m + 9 1.0m

    m

    wLy2

    = 28.9018

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 3.52 w/3 = (10 0.6m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 29.3877

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.9 4.22 w/3 + 1.6 4.22 w/2 + 0.5 3.5 4.22 w/3

    = (10 1.0m) m

    wLy2

    = 25.7678

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 28.4544

    1.0

    m

    0.6

    m

    1.0 m

    1.4 m

  • 111

  • 112

    4.20. TWO ADJACENT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.A.C) (Refer Fig. 4.15)

    = 0.1, = 0.3

    r = 1.0

    = 0.667, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 34.93547

    r1 = 2.23 c1 = 4.5

    r2 = 2.41301 c2 = 4.1

    r3 = 1.810 c3 = 5.5

    Failure Pattern: 3

    Segmental Equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 4.278/3.5 1m = 1.222m

    Segment A:

    0.5 4.278 3.5 (1 + 3.5/3) w + 2.5 12 w/2

    + 0.5 4.5 4.52 w/3 + 1.222m 1 = = 7 0.6m + 8.778 1.0m

    m

    wLy2

    = 35.997

    Segment B:

    0.5 3.5 4.278 (1.222 + 4.278/3) w + 3.5 1.2222 w/2 + 1.4 5.52

    w/2

    + 0.5 4.1 5.52 w/3 1.222m 1.222 = 9 1.0m + 9 1.4m

    m

    wLy2

    = 35.9242

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 4.12 w/3 = (10 1.0m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 35.693

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.5 4.52 w/3 + 1.4 4.52 w/2 + 0.5 4.1 4.52 w/3

    = (10 1.4m) m

    wLy2

    = 32.4074

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 35.0054

    0.6

    m

    1.0

    m

    1.4 m

    1.0 m

  • 113

  • 114

    4.21. ONE SHORT EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.D) (Refer Fig. 4.16)

    = 0.3, = 0.2

    r = 1.0

    = 0.5, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 38.02753

    r1 = 2.1 c1 = 4.8

    r2 = 3.10909 c2 = 3.2

    r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5

    Patterns: 2

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 2.67/2.5 1.33m = 1.4204m

    Segment A:

    0.5 2.5 2.67 (2.13 + 2.67/3)w + 2.5 2.132 w/2

    + 0.5 5.5 4.82 w/3 1.4204m 2.13

    = 8 0.67m + 8 0.67m m

    wLy2

    = 37.2804

    Segment B:

    0.5 2.67 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3) w + 1.8 22 w/2 + 2 4.52 w/2

    + 0.5 3.2 4.52 w/3 + 1.4204m 2

    = 7 1.33m + 7.87 1.33m m

    wLy2

    = 38.3989

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 3.22 w/3 = (10 0.67m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 39.2577

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.8 5.52 w/3 + 2 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 3.2 5.52 w/3

    = (10 1.33m) + (10 1.33m) m

    wLy2

    = 37.6877

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 38.1562

    0.6

    7 m

    0.6

    7 m

    1.33 m

    1.33 m

  • 115

  • 116

    4.22. ONE SHORT EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.D) (Refer Fig. 4.17)

    = 0.3, = 0.2

    r = 1.0

    = 0.5, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 34.58847

    r1 = 2.1 c1 = 4.8

    r2 = 4.20909 c2 = 2.4

    r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5

    Patterns: 2

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 2.67/2.5 1.0m = 1.068m

    Segment A:

    0.5 2.5 2.67 (2.13 + 2.67/3)w + 2.5 2.132 w/2

    + 0.5 5.5 4.82 w/3 1.068m 2.13

    = 8 0.33m + 8 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 35.0278

    Segment B:

    0.5 2.67 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3) w + 1.8 22 w/2 + 2.8 4.52 w/2

    + 0.5 2.4 4.52 w/3 + 1.068m 2

    = 7 1.67m + 7.87 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 35.1956

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 2.42 w/3 = (10 0.33m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 34.3750

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.8 5.52 w/3 + 2.8 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 2.4 5.52 w/3

    = (10 1.0m) + (10 1.67m) m

    wLy2

    = 33.9479

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 34.6366

    1.0

    m

    0.3

    3 m

    1.0 m

    1.67 m

  • 117

  • 118

    4.23. ONE SHORT EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.D) (Refer Fig. 4.18)

    = 0.3, = 0.2

    r = 1.0

    = 0.5, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 40.91521

    r1 = 2.2 c1 = 4.5

    r2 = 2.6333 c2 = 3.8

    r3 = 2.2 c3 = 4.5

    Failure Pattern: 2

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 2.5/2.5 1.67m = 1.67m

    Segment A:

    0.5 2.5 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3) w + 2.5 22 w/2

    + 0.5 5.5 4.52 w/3 1.67m 2 = 8 1.0m + 8 0.33m

    m

    wLy2

    = 40.1261

    Segment B:

    0.5 2.5 2.5 (2+2.5/3) w + 1.5 22 w/2 + 1.7 4.52 w/3

    + 0.5 3.8 4.52 w/3 + 1.67m 2 = 7 1.0m + 8 1.67m

    m

    wLy2

    = 43.0763

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 3.82 w/3 = (10 1.0m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 41.5455

    Segment D:

    0.5 4.5 5.52 w/3 + 1.7 5.52 w/2 + 0.5 3.8 5.52 w/3

    = (10 1.67m) + (10 1.0m) m

    wLy2

    = 39.5214

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 41.0673

    0.3

    3 m

    1.0

    m

    1.67 m

    1.0 m

  • 119

  • 120

    4.24. ONE LONG EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.D) (Refer Fig. 4.19)

    = 0.4, = 0.3

    r = 1.0

    = 0.667, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 26.75861

    r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 5.0

    r3 = 1.98147 c3 = 5.0

    r4 = 2.21888 c4 = 4.5

    Failure Pattern: 9

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 2/2 0.9m = 0.9m

    Segment A:

    2 32 w/2 + 0.5 2 2 (3 + 2/3) w + 0.5 52 w/2

    + 0.5 4.5 52 w/3 0.9m 3 = 7 0.6m + 7 0.6m

    m

    wLy2

    = 26.8549

    Segment B:

    0.5 2 2 (3 + 2/3) w + 1 32 w/2 + 0.5 5 52 w/3

    + 0.9m 3 = 6 0.9m + 7 0.9m

    m

    wLy2

    = 27.5507

    Segment C:

    0.5 5 52 w/3 + 0.5 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.5 52 w/3

    = 10 0.6m + 10 0.6m m

    wLy2

    = 26.1837

    Segment D:

    0.5 10 4.52 w/3

    = 10 0.9m m

    wLy2

    = 26.6667

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 26.8140

    0.6

    m

    0.6

    m

    0.9 m

    0.9 m

  • 121

  • 122

    4.25. ONE LONG EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.D) (Refer Fig. 4.20)

    = 0.4, = 0.3

    r = 1.0

    = 0.667, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 24.27114

    r1 = 2.1111 c1 = 4.7

    r3 = 1.8148 c3 = 5.5

    r4 = 2.62729 c4 = 3.8

    Failure Pattern: 9

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 2.136/2.5 0.6m = 0.513m

    Segment A:

    2.5 2.5642 w/2 + 0.5 2.5 2.136 (2.564 + 2.136/3) w + 0.7 4.72

    w/2

    + 0.5 3.8 4.72 w/3 0.513m 2.564 = 7 0.7m + 7 0.5m

    m

    wLy2

    = 25.1130

    Segment B:

    0.5 2.136 2.5 (3 + 2.5/3) w + 0.7 32 w/2 + 0.5 5.3 5.52 w/3

    + 0.513m 3 = 6 1.2m + 7.436 0.6m

    m

    wLy2

    = 25.2397

    Segment C:

    0.5 5.5 5.32 w/3 + 0.7 5.32 w/2 + 0.5 3.8 5.32 w/3

    = 10 0.7m + 10 0.5m m

    wLy2

    = 22.4841

    Segment D:

    0.5 10 3.82 w/3

    = 10 0.6m m

    wLy2

    = 24.9273

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 24.4410

    0.7

    m

    0.5

    m

    0.6 m

    1.2 m

  • 123

  • 124

    4.26. ONE LONG EDGE DISCONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.D) (Refer Fig. 4.21)

    = 0.4, = 0.3

    r = 1.0

    = 0.667, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 28.89752

    r1 = 1.8111 c1 = 5.5

    r3 = 2.4148 c3 = 4.1

    r4 = 2.00681 c4 = 5.0

    Failure Pattern: 9

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Segment A:

    0.5 1.1 1.5 (4 + 1.5/3) w + 0.9 5.52 w/2

    + 0.5 5 5.52 w/3 = 7 0.7m + 7 0.5m

    m

    wLy2

    = 19.7508

    Segment B:

    0.5 1.5 1.1 (3+1.1/3) w + 1.5 32 w/2 + 0.5 4.5 4.12 w/3

    = 6 1.2m + 6 0.6m

    m

    wLy2

    = 48.7915

    Segment C:

    0.5 4.1 4.52 w/3 + 0.9 4.52 w/2 + 0.5 5 4.52 w/3

    = 10 0.7m + 10 0.5m

    m

    wLy2

    = 30.1318

    Segment D:

    0.5 10 52 w/3

    = (10 1.2m) m

    wLy2

    = 28.7977

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 31.8915

    0.5

    m

    0.7

    m

    1.2 m

    0.6 m

  • 125

  • 126

    4.27. ONE SHORT EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.22)

    = 0.3, = 0.1

    r = 1.0

    = 1.0, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 29.43841

    r1 = 1.80 c1 = 5.6

    r2 = 2.55 c2 = 3.9

    r3 = 2.10 c3 = 4.8

    Failure Pattern: 2

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 4.433/3.8 1.5m = 1.75m

    Segment A:

    0.5 3.8 4.433 (1.167 + 4.433/3) w + 3.8 1.1672 w/2

    + 0.5 5.2 5.62 w/3 1.75m 1.167 = 9 0.75m + 9 0.75m

    m

    wLy2

    = 29.8652

    Segment B:

    0.5 4.433 3.8 (1 + 3.8/3) w + 2.6 12 w/2 + 0.5 4.82 w/2

    + 0.5 3.9 4.82 w/3 + 1.75m 1 = 8.833 1.5m

    m

    wLy2

    = 27.9607

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 3.92 w/3 = (10 0.75m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 29.5857

    Segment D:

    0.5 5.6 5.22 w/3 + 0.5 5.22 w/2 + 0.5 3.9 5.22 w/3

    = (10 1.5m) m

    wLy2

    = 30.2582

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 29.4174

    0.7

    5 m

    0.7

    5 m

    1.5 m

  • 127

  • 128

    4.28. ONE SHORT EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.23)

    = 0.3, = 0.1

    r = 1.0

    = 1.0, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 27.40698

    r1 = 1.7 c1 = 5.9

    r2 = 3.02857 c2 = 3.3

    r3 = 2.10 c3 = 4.8

    Failure Patterns: 2

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 4.671/3.8 1.5m = 1.844m

    Segment A:

    0.5 3.8 4.671 (1.229 + 4.671/3) w + 3.8 1.2292 w/2

    + 0.5 5.2 5.92 w/3 1.844m 1.229 = 9 1.0m + 9 0.5m

    m

    wLy2

    = 27.2944

    Segment B:

    0.5 4.671 3.8 (1 + 3.8/3) w + 2.9 12 w/2 + 0.8 4.82 w/2

    + 0.5 3.3 4.82 w/3 + 1.844m 1 = 8.771 1.5m

    m

    wLy2

    = 26.033

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 3.32 w/3 = (10 0.5m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 27.5482

    Segment D:

    0.5 5.9 5.22 w/3 + 0.8 5.22 w/2 + 0.5 3.3 5.22 w/3

    = (10 1.5m) m

    wLy2

    = 28.6931

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 27.3922

    1.0

    m

    0.5

    m

    1.5 m

  • 129

  • 130

    4.29. ONE SHORT EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.24)

    = 0.3, = 0.1

    r = 1.0

    = 1.0, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 31.23402

    r1 = 1.8111 c1 = 5.5

    r3 = 2.1333 c3 = 4.7

    r4 = 1.88238 c4 = 5.3

    Failure Pattern: 9

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 4.33/3.7 1.5m = 1.755m

    Segment A:

    0.5 3.7 4.33 (1.17 + 4.33/3) w + 3.7 1.172 w/2

    + 0.5 5.3 5.52 w/3 1.755m 1.17 = 9 0.5m + 9 1.0m

    m

    wLy2

    = 30.9906

    Segment B:

    0.5 4.33 3.7 (1 + 3.7/3) w + 2.5 12 w/2 + 0.5 4.5 4.72 w/3

    + 1.755m 1 = 8.83 1.5m

    m

    wLy2

    = 32.1780

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 4.52 w/3 = (10 1.0m)

    m

    wLy2

    = 29.6296

    Segment D:

    0.5 10 5.32 w/3

    = (10 1.5m) m

    wLy2

    = 32.0398

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 31.2095

    0.5

    m

    1.0

    m

    1.5 m

  • 131

  • 132

    4.30. ONE LONG EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.25)

    = 0.2, = 0.1

    r = 1.2

    = 1.0, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 31.95957

    r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 6.0

    r3 = 1.8222 c3 = 5.5

    r4 = 2.31625 c4 = 4.3

    Failure Pattern: 9

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 4.909/4.5 1m = 1.091m

    Segment A:

    0.5 4.5 4.909 (1.091 + 4.909/3) w + 4.5 1.0912 w/2 + 0.2 62

    w/2

    + 0.5 4.3 62 w/3 1.091m 1.091 = 9 2.0m

    m

    wLy2

    = 30.8514

    Segment B:

    0.5 4.909 4.5 (1 + 4.5/3) w + 3.6 12 w/2 + 0.5 6 5.52 w/3

    + 1.091m 1 = 9.6 1.0m + 10.909 1.0m

    m

    wLy2

    = 32.5461

    Segment C:

    0.5 5.5 62 w/3 + 0.2 62 w/2 + 0.5 4.3 62 w/3

    = 10 2.0m m

    wLy2

    = 32.0513

    Segment D:

    0.5 12 4.32 w/3

    = 12 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 32.45

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 31.9747

    2.0

    m

    1.0 m

    1.0 m

  • 133

  • 134

    4.31. ONE LONG EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.26)

    = 0.2, = 0.1

    r = 1.2

    = 1.0, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 27.81781

    r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 6.0

    r3 = 1.7222 c3 = 5.8

    r4 = 3.08465 c4 = 3.2

    Failure Pattern: 9

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 4.966/4.8 0.5m = 0.517m

    Segment A:

    0.5 4.8 4.966 (1.034 + 4.966/3) w + 4.8 1.0342 w/2

    + 1 62 w/2 + 0.5 3.2 62 w/3 0.517m 1.034

    = 9 2.0m m

    wLy2

    = 25.8075

    Segment B:

    0.5 4.966 4.8 (1 + 4.8/3) w + 3.6 12 w/2 + 0.5 6 5.82 w/3

    + 0.517m 1 = 9.6 1.5m + 10.966 0.5m

    m

    wLy2

    = 29.15351

    Segment C:

    0.5 5.8 62 w/3 + 1 62 w/2 + 0.5 3.2 62 w/3

    = 10 2.0m m

    wLy2

    = 27.7778

    Segment D:

    0.5 12 3.22 w/3

    = 12 0.5m m

    wLy2

    = 29.2969

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 28.0089

    2.0

    m

    0.5 m

    1.5 m

  • 135

  • 136

    4.32. ONE LONG EDGE CONTINUOUS SLAB (O.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.27)

    = 0.2, = 0.1

    r = 1.2

    = 1.0, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 35.50319

    r1 = 2.1 c1 = 5.7

    r2 = 2.10909 c2 = 5.7

    r3 = 2.0 c3 = 5

    Failure Pattern: 2

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 4.56/4 1.5m = 1.71m

    Segment A:

    0.5 4 4.56 (1.14 + 4.56/3) w + 4 1.142 w/2

    + 0.5 5 5.72 w/3 1.71m 1.14 = 9 2.0m

    m

    wLy2

    = 36.9889

    Segment B:

    0.5 4.56 4 (1 + 4/3) w + 3.3 12 w/2 + 0.6 52 w/2

    + 0.5 5.7 52 w/3 + 1.171m 1 = 9.6 0.5m + 10.86 1.5m

    m

    wLy2

    = 36.7644

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 5.72 w/3

    = 10 2.0m m

    wLy2

    = 36.9344

    Segment D:

    0.5 5.7 52 w/3 + 0.6 52 w/2 + 0.5 5.7 52 w/3

    = 12 1.5m

    ` m

    wLy2

    = 32.7272

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 35.8537

    2.0

    m

    1.5 m

    0.5 m

  • 137

  • 138

    4.33. TWO SHORT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.28)

    = 0.2, = 0.3

    r = 1.2

    = 1.5, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 26.72977

    r1 = 2.315 c1 = 5.2

    r2 = 1.86046 c2 = 6.5

    r3 = 2.01 c3 = 5

    Failure Pattern: 3

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 2.692/2.8 0.9m = 0.865m

    Segment A:

    0.5 2.692 2.8 (2.4 + 2.8/3) w + 2 2.42 w/2

    + 0.5 5 5.22 w/3 + 0.865m 2.4

    = 7 0.9m + 7.692 0.9m m

    wLy2

    = 27.2831

    Segment B:

    0.5 2.8 2.692 (2.308 + 2.692/3) w + 2.8 2.3082 w/2 + 0.3 52

    w/2

    + 0.5 6.5 52 w/3 0.865m 2.308 = 9.6 1.2m

    m

    wLy2

    = 26.8336

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 6.52 w/3

    = 10 0.9m + 10 0.9m m

    wLy2

    = 25.56213

    Segment D:

    0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 0.3 52 w/2 + 0.5 6.5 52 w/3

    = 12 1.2m m

    wLy2

    = 27.4285

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 26.7769

    0.9

    m

    0.9

    m

    1.2 m

  • 139

  • 140

    4.34. TWO SHORT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.29)

    = 0.2, = 0.3

    r = 1.2

    = 1.5, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 26.69564

    r1 = 2.315 c1 = 5.2

    r2 = 1.86046 c2 = 6.5

    r3 = 2.01 c3 = 5

    Failure Patterns: 3

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 2.692/2.8 0.8m = 0.769m

    Segment A:

    0.5 2.692 2.8 (2.4 + 2.8/3) w + 2 2.42 w/2

    + 0.5 5 5.22 w/3 + 0.769m 2.4

    = 7 1.0m + 7.692 0.8m m

    wLy2

    = 27.6777

    Segment B:

    0.5 2.8 2.692 (2.308 + 2.692/3) w + 2.8 2.3082 w/2 + 0.3 52

    w/2

    + 0.5 6.5 52 w/3 0.769m 2.308

    = 9.6 1.2m m

    wLy2

    = 26.3938

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 6.52 w/3

    = 10 1.0m + 10 0.8m m

    wLy2

    = 25.5621

    Segment D:

    0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 0.3 52 w/2 + 0.5 6.5 52 w/3

    = 12 1.2m m

    wLy2

    = 27.4285

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 26.7655

    1.0

    m

    0.8

    m

    1.2 m

  • 141

  • 142

    4.35. TWO SHORT EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.S.C) (Refer Fig. 4.30)

    = 0.2, = 0.3

    r = 1.2

    = 1.5, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 26.7639

    r1 = 2.315 c1 = 5.2

    r2 = 1.86046 c2 = 6.5

    r3 = 2.01 c3 = 5

    Failure Pattern: 3

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 2.692/2.8 1m = 0.961m

    Segment A:

    0.5 2.692 2.8 (2.4 + 2.8/3) w + 2 2.42 w/2

    + 0.5 5 5.22 w/3 + 0.961m 2.4

    = 7 0.8m + 7.692 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 26.8886

    Segment B:

    0.5 2.8 2.692 (2.308 + 2.692/3) w + 2.8 2.3082 w/2 + 0.3 52

    w/2

    + 0.5 6.5 52 w/3 0.961m 2.308 = 9.6 1.2m

    m

    wLy2

    = 27.2735

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 6.52 w/3

    = 10 0.8m + 10 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 25.5621

    Segment D:

    0.5 5.2 52 w/3 + 0.3 52 w/2 + 0.5 6.5 52 w/3

    = 12 1.2m m

    wLy2

    = 27.4286

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 26.7882

    0.8

    m

    1.0

    m

    1.2 m

  • 143

  • 144

    4.36. TWO LONG EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.31)

    = 0.3, = 0.2

    r = 1.2

    = 1.5, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 35.63814

    r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 6

    r3 = 2.31665 c3 = 4.3

    r4 = 1.9595 c4 = 5.1

    Failure Pattern: 9

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 3.209/2.3 0.8m = 1.116m

    Segment A:

    0.5 2.3 3.209 (2.791 + 3.209/3) w + 2.3 2.7912 w/2

    + 0.6 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.1 62 w/3 1.116m 2.791

    = 8 2.4m m

    wLy2

    = 34.54013

    Segment B:

    0.5 3.209 2.3 (2 + 2.3/3) w + 2.4 22 w/2 + 0.5 6 4.32 w/3

    + 1.116m 2.0 = 8.4 0.8m + 9.209 0.8m

    m

    wLy2

    = 35.3887

    Segment C:

    0.5 4.3 62 w/3 + 0.6 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.1 62 w/3

    = 10 2.4m m

    wLy2

    = 35.7143

    Segment D:

    0.5 12 5.12 w/3

    = 12 0.8m + 12 0.8m m

    wLy2

    = 36.9089

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 35.638

    2.4

    m

    0.8 m

    0.8 m

  • 145

  • 146

    4.37. TWO LONG EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.32)

    = 0.3, = 0.2

    r = 1.2

    = 1.5, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 35.48967

    r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 6

    r3 = 2.21665 c3 = 4.5

    r4 = 1.92193 c4 = 5.2

    Failure Pattern: 9

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 3.333/2.5 0.5m = 0.667m

    Segment A:

    0.5 2.5 3.333 (2.667 + 3.333/3) w + 2.5 2.6672 w/2

    + 0.3 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.2 62 w/3 0.667m 2.667

    = 8 2.4m m

    wLy2

    = 34.26176

    Segment B:

    0.5 3.333 2.5 (2 + 2.5/3) w + 2.4 22 w/2 + 0.5 6 4.52 w/3

    + 0.667m 2.0 = 8.4 1.1m + 9.333 0.5m

    m

    wLy2

    = 35.1140

    Segment C:

    0.5 4.5 62 w/3 + 0.3 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.2 62 w/3

    = 10 2.4m m

    wLy2

    = 37.7358

    Segment D:

    0.5 12 5.22 w/3

    = 12 1.1m + 12 0.5m m

    wLy2

    = 35.5029

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 35.4036

    2.4

    m

    0.5 m

    1.1 m

  • 147

  • 148

    4.38. TWO LONG EDGES CONTINUOUS SLAB (T.L.C) (Refer Fig. 4.33)

    = 0.3, = 0.2

    r = 1.2

    = 1.5, k = 4.0

    Virtual work method: Reverse of Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 35.77388

    r1 = 2.0111 c1 = 6

    r3 = 2.41665 c3 = 4.1

    r4 = 1.90589 c4 = 5.2

    Failure Patterns: 9

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 3.073/2.1 1.1m = 1.61m

    Segment A:

    0.5 2.1 3.073 (2.927 + 3.073/3) w + 2.1 2.9272 w/2

    + 0.7 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.2 62 w/3 1.61m 2.927

    = 8 2.4m m

    wLy2

    = 36.4825

    Segment B:

    0.5 3.073 2.1 (2 + 2.1/3) w + 2.4 22 w/2 + 0.5 6 4.12 w/3

    + 1.61m 2 = 8.4 0.5m + 9.073 1.1m

    m

    wLy2

    = 36.1464

    Segment C:

    0.5 4.1 62 w/3 + 0.7 62 w/2 + 0.5 5.2 62 w/3

    = 10 2.4m m

    wLy2

    = 35.0877

    Segment D:

    0.5 12 5.22 w/3

    = 12 0.5m + 12 1.1m m

    wLy2

    = 35.5029

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 35.8049

    2.4

    m

    1.1 m

    0.5 m

  • 149

  • 150

    4.39. SIMPLY SUPPORTED SLAB (S.S) (Refer Fig. 4.34)

    = 0.1, = 0.3

    r = 1.2

    = 2.0, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Affine theorem coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 27.37743

    r1 = 2.11111 c1 = 5.7

    r3 = 2.10370 c3 = 4.8

    r4 = 2.10604 c4 = 4.7

    Failure Pattern: 10

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 3.789/4.5 2.0m = 1.684m

    Segment A:

    0.5 3.789 4.5 (1.2 + 4.5/3) w + 1.8 1.22 w/2

    + 0.5 5.72 w/2 + 0.5 4.7 5.72 w/3 + 1.684m 1.2

    = 8.989 2.0m m

    wLy2

    = 27.5652

    Segment B:

    0.5 4.5 3.789 (1.011 + 3.789/3) w + 4.5 1.0112 w/2

    + 0.5 6.3 4.82 w/3 1.684m 1.011 = 10.8 1.0m

    m

    wLy2

    = 27.2514

    Segment C:

    0.5 4.8 6.32 w/3 + 0.5 6.32 w/2 + 0.5 4.7 6.32 w/3

    = 10 2.0m m

    wLy2

    = 27.4857

    Segment D:

    0.5 12 4.72 w/3

    = 12 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 27.1616

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 27.3660

    2.0

    m

    1.0 m

  • 151

  • 152

    4.40. SIMPLY SUPPORTED SLAB (S.S) (Refer Fig. 4.35)

    = 0.1, = 0.3

    r = 1.2

    = 2.0, k = 3.0

    Virtual work method: Designers choice coefficients

    m

    wLy2

    = 29.66902

    r1 = 3.13 c1 = 3.8

    r2 = 2.66948 c2 = 4.5

    r3 = 2.01 c3 = 5

    Failure Pattern: 3

    Segmental equilibrium method:

    Q1 = 3.421/2.6 1.0m = 1.316m

    Segment A:

    0.5 3.421 2.6 (1.2 + 2.6/3) w + 2 1.22 w/2

    + 0.5 5 3.82 w/3 + 1.316m 1.2

    = 8.421 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 30.1874

    Segment B:

    0.5 2.6 3.421 (1.579 + 3.421/3) w + 2.6 1.5792 w/2 + 3.7 52

    w/2

    + 0.5 52 4.5 w/3 1.316m 1.579 = 10.8 2.0m

    m

    wLy2

    = 29.4740

    Segment C:

    0.5 10 4.52 w/3

    = 10 1.0m m

    wLy2

    = 29.6296

    Segment D:

    0.5 3.8 52 w/3 + 3.7 52 w/2 + 0.5 4.5 52 w/3

    = 12 2.0m m

    wLy2

    = 29.6907

    Average m

    wLy2

    = 29.7454

    1.0

    m

    2.0 m

  • 153