41
0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium Pantoea agglomerans 33.1 1 RUNNING TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion endophyte 2 3 Quecine, M.C. 1* , Araújo, W.L. 2* , Rossetto, P.B. 3 ; Ferreira. A. 4 ; Tsui, S. 1 ; Lacava, P.T. 5 , 4 Mondin, M. 1 ; Azevedo, J.L. 1 ; Pizzirani-Kleiner, A.A. 1 5 1. Department of Genetics, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, University of São 6 Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias 11, P.O. BOX 83, 13400-970, Piracicaba,SP, Brazil. 7 2. Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Av. 8 Prof. Lineu Prestes, 1374 - Ed. Biomédicas II, Cidade Universitária, 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, 9 Brasil 10 3. CENA – University of São Paulo, Av. Centenário 303, 13400-970 Piracicaba SP, Brazil, 11 4. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Embrapa Agrosilvopasture, Av. das Itaúbas, 12 3257, CEP 78550-194, Sinop, MT, Brazil. 13 5. Institute of Natural Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 14 700, Alfenas 37130-000, MG, Brazil 15 *Corresponding authors. 16 Mailing address: 17 Department of Genetics, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, University of São 18 Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias 11, P.O. BOX 83, 13400-970, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. E-mail: 19 [email protected], Tel. (55-19) 3429 4248 20 Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. 21 Lineu Prestes, 1374 - Ed. Biomédicas II, Cidade Universitária, 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, 22 Brasil. E-mail: [email protected], Tel. (55-11) 3091 8346 23 Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.00836-12 AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 3 August 2012 on March 16, 2018 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

0

TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium Pantoea agglomerans 33.1 1

RUNNING TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion endophyte 2

3

Quecine, M.C.1*, Araújo, W.L. 2*, Rossetto, P.B.3; Ferreira. A. 4; Tsui, S. 1; Lacava, P.T.5, 4

Mondin, M.1; Azevedo, J.L. 1; Pizzirani-Kleiner, A.A. 1 5

1. Department of Genetics, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, University of São 6

Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias 11, P.O. BOX 83, 13400-970, Piracicaba,SP, Brazil. 7

2. Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Av. 8

Prof. Lineu Prestes, 1374 - Ed. Biomédicas II, Cidade Universitária, 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, 9

Brasil 10

3. CENA – University of São Paulo, Av. Centenário 303, 13400-970 Piracicaba SP, Brazil, 11

4. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Embrapa Agrosilvopasture, Av. das Itaúbas, 12

3257, CEP 78550-194, Sinop, MT, Brazil. 13

5. Institute of Natural Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 14

700, Alfenas 37130-000, MG, Brazil 15

*Corresponding authors. 16

Mailing address: 17

Department of Genetics, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, University of São 18

Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias 11, P.O. BOX 83, 13400-970, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. E-mail: 19

[email protected], Tel. (55-19) 3429 4248 20

Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. 21

Lineu Prestes, 1374 - Ed. Biomédicas II, Cidade Universitária, 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, 22

Brasil. E-mail: [email protected], Tel. (55-11) 3091 8346 23

Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.00836-12 AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 3 August 2012

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 2: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

1

Abstract 24

The promotion of sugarcane growth by the endophytic Pantoea agglomerans strain 33.1 was 25

studied under gnotobiotic and greenhouse conditions. The GFP-tagged strain P. agglomerans 26

33.1:pNKGFP was monitored in vitro in sugarcane plants by microscopy, re-isolation and 27

quantitative PCR (qPCR). Using qPCR and re-isolation 4 and 15 days after inoculation, we 28

observed that GFP-tagged strains reach similar density levels both in the rhizosphere and inside 29

the roots and aerial plant tissues. Microscopic analysis was performed at 5, 10 and 18 days after 30

inoculation. Under greenhouse conditions, P. agglomerans 33.1-inoculated sugarcane plants 31

presented more dry mass 30 days after inoculation. Cross-colonization was confirmed by re-32

isolation of the GFP-tagged strain. These data demonstrated that 33.1:pNKGFP is a superior 33

colonizer of sugarcane due to its ability to colonize a number of different plant parts. The growth 34

promotion observed in colonized plants may be related to the ability of P. agglomerans 33.1 to 35

synthesize IAA and solubilize phosphate. Additionally, this strain may trigger chitinase and 36

cellulase production by plant roots, suggesting the induction of a plant defense system. However, 37

levels of indigenous bacterial colonization did not vary between inoculated and non-inoculated 38

sugarcane plants under greenhouse conditions, suggesting that the presence of P. agglomerans 39

33.1 has no effect on these communities. In this study, different techniques were used to monitor 40

33.1:pNKGFP during sugarcane cross-colonization, and our results suggested that this plant 41

growth promoter could be used with other crops. The interaction between sugarcane and P. 42

agglomerans 33.1 has important benefits that promote the plant’s growth and fitness. 43

44

45

46

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 3: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

2

Introduction 47

The existence of endophytic bacterial communities has been recognized for over a 48

hundred years (32). Initially, these microorganisms were considered to be neutral with regard to 49

their effects on host plants; more recently, however, their positive impact has been verified in a 50

broad range of crops (67), in which they may contribute directly to plant growth by promoting 51

nutrient availability, biological nitrogen fixation and the production of phytohormones (38, 69). 52

Indirectly, they may also reduce microbial populations that are harmful to the plant, acting as 53

agents of biological control through competition, antibiosis or systemic resistance induction (61, 54

72). 55

Members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (Gammaproteobacteria) are frequently 56

described as rhizosphere colonizers of sugarcane and other grasses (84). This class includes 57

Enterobacter sp. (8, 49), Klebsiella (49), Enterobacter cloacae and P. agglomerans (formerly 58

Erwinia herbicola) (63). Many studies have reported the endophytic presence of 59

Enterobacteriaceae members in various crop species (77). P. agglomerans has been described as 60

an important corn and wheat endophyte (65), and it has also been isolated from potato stems (2), 61

rice seeds (65, 66) and citrus leaves (1). Many studies have shown the potential of Pantoea spp. 62

for systemic resistance induction (37, 44, 56) and protection against pests and plant-pathogenic 63

microorganisms (4, 9, 28, 59). Additionally, these bacteria may induce plant growth by 64

increasing the nitrogen supply in non-symbiotic associations (2, 7, 70, 81), solubilizing 65

phosphorus (45, 46, 73) and stimulating phytohormone production (79, 85). 66

Much of the current research in the field focuses on the capacity of endophytes to 67

colonize several different agronomically important hosts. The term for this phenomenon in 68

endophytes, cross-colonization, is adopted more commonly from the plant-pathogen literature 69

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 4: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

3

(23). Zakria et al. (84) demonstrated that strains of Pantoea sp. (18-2) from sweet potato and 70

Enterobacter sp. (35-1) from sugarcane are able to endophytically colonize rice and promote its 71

growth. K. pneumoniae 342 (Kp342), isolated from corn and subsequently labeled with the green 72

fluorescence protein (GFP), was able to colonize C. roseus and C. sinensis (42). 73

The introduction of a potentially beneficial bacterium with cross-colonization capacity 74

requires careful monitoring. One of the oldest techniques for monitoring microorganisms in an 75

environment is to plate the organism on solid media in a laboratory; this technique has several 76

limitations, especially the considerable time required to obtain results. Recently, molecular 77

approaches have been developed to monitor bacterial species in host environments. For example, 78

tagging with related gene markers, such as GFP, has been particularly useful for following 79

bacterial infection pathways and for characterizing tissue and organ colonization (14, 27, 75, 76). 80

The qPCR technique, commonly employed to quantify and study clinical (5, 17, 57), 81

phytopathogenic (54, 82, 15, 47, 6) and endophytic (41) bacteria, has also been used for these 82

purposes. 83

Sugarcane tissue culture has been used to remove pathogens from desirable material (34), 84

and it has been used in breeding programs to reduce cloning time and rapidly obtain large 85

amounts of material with the desired genotype. For this reason, we studied the possibility of 86

plant growth promotion during sugarcane seedling acclimation. We aimed to reduce the time of 87

seedling development under greenhouse conditions, therefore reducing the costs of seedling 88

production. A plant-growth promoting strain of P. agglomerans 33.1, previously isolated from 89

Eucalyptus grandis, was evaluated during its interactions with sugarcane, with a focus on its 90

potential for cross-colonization and promotion of sugarcane growth under nursery conditions 91

during seedling acclimation. 92

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 5: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

4

93

Materials and Methods 94

95

Microorganisms and growth conditions 96

Pantoea agglomerans 33.1 isolated from Eucalyptus grandis plants (59) and its 97

derivative tagged strain 33.1:pNKGFP (25) as well as Escherichia coli derivatives were routinely 98

grown at 28°C and 37°C, respectively, on Luria Bertani (LB) medium (68). The tagged strain 99

33.1:pNKBOR was obtained according to the methodology described by Ferreira et al. (25). All 100

of the strains (Table 1) were stored in 20% glycerol at -80°C. The plasmids were propagated and 101

isolated from E. coli DH5-α pir or Top 10 and purified with the Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Mobio) 102

according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. 103

104

Plant material 105

The sugarcane seedlings (var. SP80 1842 and SP80 3240) were initially cultivated under 106

in vitro conditions. The seedlings were supplied by Dr. Sabrina Moutinho Chabregas (CTC, 107

Piracicaba, SP, Brazil). 108

109

Cross-colonization under gnotobiotic assays 110

For plant inoculation, the bacterial cells were transferred to 50 ml of LB medium 111

supplemented with kanamycin (100 μg/ml) and incubated at 28°C under shaking conditions (150 112

rpm) until the late log phase. The cells were harvested (at 4500 g for 15 min) and washed with 113

phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 6.5, and the cell density was adjusted to 105 CFU/ml. The 114

SP80 1842 sugarcane seedlings were cultured in 50-ml tubes containing 7 ml of agar-free MS 115

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 6: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

5

medium (51) with the endophytic bacteria at 28º C under 16-h photoperiods. In the control 116

plants, PBS was used in place of the bacterial suspension. Eighteen days after bacterial 117

inoculation (DAI), three plants per treatment were sampled for fluorescence microscopy (FO) 118

and scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) analysis. The re-isolation and qPCR procedures were 119

performed on 5 plants at 5 and 14 DAI. 120

121

Fluorescence microscopy 122

Roots and aerial fresh tissues were cut and immediately observed with visible light and 123

fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss, Axiophot II, Germany) under a green (FITC, 510 nm) 124

fluorescence filter. Both images were combined, using the overlay module in the MetaVue 125

program (Universal Imaging Corporation, USA), to identify the bacterial cells. 126

127

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) 128

Plant tissue were cut (approximately 2 cm2), fixed in buffered Karnovsky solution (2% 129

glutaraldehyde, 0.001 M CaCl2, 2.5% paraformaldehyde) at 4°C and rinsed three times (10 min 130

for each rinsing) with a 0.05 M cacodylate buffer at pH 7.2. The samples were infiltrated with a 131

30% glycerol solution for 30 min and treated with an osmium tetroxide solution in a 1% 132

cacodylate buffer for 2 h. The samples were then washed three times in distilled water, 133

dehydrated with acetone (in a series of 30, 50, 70, 90 and 100% acetone dilutions), dried to the 134

critical point using a dryer (BALZERS-CPD 030), mounted on aluminum stubs and coated with 135

gold (BALZERS-MED 010). The metal-coated samples were examined using SEM (LEO-136

ZEISS). 137

138

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 7: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

6

Southern blot analysis 139

The number of insertions of the pNKGFP fragment in the 33.1:pNKGFP genome was 140

confirmed using Southern blotting. For this technique, probes were generated by PCR, using 141

primers (PPNKF: 5’ - CCT TCA TTA CAG AAA CGG C - 3’ and PPNKRII: 5’ - GGT GAT 142

GCG TGA TCT GAT CC - 3’) designed by the OligoPerfect Designer program (Invitrogen) 143

based on the pNKBOR sequence. 144

These primers amplify a 362 bp sequence located between the insertion sites (IS) that 145

correspond to a portion of the kanr gene and a conserved plasmid fragment. The probe specificity 146

was evaluated using DNA from the strains, plasmids (Table 1) and plants. The PCR reaction 147

contained 1 μL of the samples (10 ng), 0.2 M of primers PPNKF and PPNKRII, 3.75 mM of 148

MgCl2, 0.2 mM of a dNTP mixture and 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas) combined 149

with buffer 1X for a final volume of 25 μl. The PCR program consisted of an initial denaturation 150

step at 94ºC for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94ºC for 30 s, annealing at 58ºC 151

for 45 s and extension at 72ºC for 30 s. The final step was a 10 min extension at 72ºC. The 152

amplified products were separated by electrophoresis with a 1.2 % agarose gel and stained with 153

ethidium bromide. 154

The probes were labeled using the random-primed DNA labeling method, and the 155

hybridization was confirmed with the Gene ImagesTM AlkPhos DirectTM labeling and detection 156

system (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 157

158

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) 159

Sugarcane seedlings inoculated either with or without 33.1:pNKGFP were sampled, and 160

the roots and aerial parts of these plants were separated. To separate the bacterial cells from the 161

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 8: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

7

sugarcane surface, the root was incubated in 2 ml of PBS buffer at 28ºC for 2 h, and the bacterial 162

cells were harvested by centrifugation. Total bacterial DNA was extracted according to Araújo et 163

al. (1). After this surface sterilization, the total DNA of the root and aerial plant parts was 164

extracted by the CTAB method, according to Doyle and Doyle (22). 165

The qPCR analysis was performed in a 25-μl final volume, which contained 12.5 μl of 166

the master mix of Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG (Invitrogen) and the PPNKF 167

and PPNKRII primers (10 μM each). Aliquots of the master mix (20 μl) were dispensed in the 168

wells, and 5 μg of DNA (50 ng/μl) were added as a PCR template. The qPCR reaction cycles 169

consisted of a denaturation step at 94ºC for 5 min, 40 cycles at 94ºC for 30 s and a final step at 170

61ºC for 15 s. The plasmidial fragment quantification was performed using an iCycler iQ Real-171

Time PCR instrument (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., USA). Four replicates in duplicate were used, 172

and a standard curve was obtained for every run using a known copy number (105 to 108) of the 173

linearized plasmid pNKGFP. 174

175

Sugarcane-growth promotion and defense-protein production 176

The micro-propagated sugarcane seedlings (var. SP80-1842 and SP80-3240) were 177

transferred to plastic pots containing the organic substrate Eucatex PlantMax® Horticultura 178

(Eucatex). The transferred plants were first acclimated in a humid chamber at 28ºC for seven 179

days. The bacterial wild type 33.1 and tagged 33.1:pNKGFP were inoculated into the substrate 180

(108 CFU/plant), and the pots were then transferred to a greenhouse at 28ºC. The substrate of 181

control pots was inoculated with PBS buffer that did not contain any bacterial cells. The dry 182

mass, related defense protein production and bacterial cross-colonization of the plants were 183

evaluated at 30 DAI. 184

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 9: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

8

Forty plants from each treatment were sampled, washed and divided into root and aerial 185

parts. The vegetative tissues were weighed and dried at 55ºC for 5 days to reach a constant 186

weight. 187

Enzymatic activity was assessed using separate total protein extractions from the leaves 188

and roots according to Ferreira-Filho et al. (26). The amount of protein present in the supernatant 189

was measured using the Bradford procedure (10), with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the 190

standard. Four replicates were used for the measurements of enzymatic activity. 191

The endoglucanase and chitinase activity from the crude plant extract was assayed using 192

CMC-RBB and CM-Chitin RBV (Lower). The enzyme activity was measured as the absorbance 193

per milliliter of the substrate reaction per hour (29). 194

195

Bacterial re-isolation 196

The densities of P. agglomerans in the rhizosphere and inside the sugarcane tissues were 197

evaluated at 4 and 15 DAI in the gnotobiotic assay and at 30 DAI in the greenhouse assay. To 198

promote the detachment of bacteria from the roots, the plant samples were placed in a new sterile 199

tube containing 2 ml of PBS and agitated at 120 rpm for 1 h. The cell suspension was diluted and 200

plated on 5% TSB for bacterial quantification. The seedlings were washed in running tap water 201

and surface-disinfected using serial rinsing in 70% ethanol and 2% hypochlorite according to 202

Araújo et al. (1). To confirm the efficiency of the disinfection process, aliquots of the sterile 203

distilled water used in the last washing were spread onto 5% TS agar medium and examined for 204

surface contaminants after a 3-day incubation at 28°C. The surface-disinfected samples were 205

macerated in a PBS buffer, and the appropriate dilutions were plated onto 5% TS agar 206

supplemented with kanamycin (100 μg/ml) and benomyl (50 μg/ml). The cultivable bacterial 207

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 10: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

9

density associated with sugarcane was also evaluated under greenhouse conditions. For this 208

process, the macerated samples were plated on TS agar without the selective antibiotic, and the 209

number of tagged strains among the indigenous community was measured by exposing the plates 210

to UV light. 211

212

Bacterial plant-growth promotion mechanisms 213

Indole acetic acid (IAA) production 214

The indole acetic acid (IAA) production of the 33.1 strain was assessed using the 215

quantitative method developed by Bric et al. (12). The absorbance (OD520 nm) values obtained 216

were interpolated from a standard curve to determine the IAA concentration. Two independent 217

experiments were performed in triplicate. 218

219

Phosphate solubilization 220

The ability of strain 33.1 to solubilize inorganic phosphate was evidenced by a halo 221

obtained after cultivation of the bacteria on culture media supplemented with two inorganic 222

phosphate sources, Ca3(PO4)2 and Al(PO4), at 28°C for 72 h, according to Verma et al. (81) and 223

Hara and Oliveira (31), respectively. An estimation of the halo size (cm) divided by the colony 224

size (cm) generated a solubilization index (SI) that was used to quantify the phosphate 225

solubilization. 226

227

Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) 228

The ability of the strain to fix atmospheric nitrogen was assessed according to Dobereiner 229

et al. (19). To confirm the ability of the strain to fix atmospheric nitrogen, seven consecutive 230

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 11: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

10

streaks were performed in the Nfb medium. The nitrogenase activity was measured after 5 days 231

of incubation using an acetylene reduction assay (33). The chromatography gas analysis was 232

completed at the Post-Harvest Laboratory, ESALQ-USP. The samples were incubated with 10% 233

acetylene for 2 h at 28°C. The nitrogenase activity was expressed in nanomoles of ethylene per 234

hour. 235

236

Statistical analysis 237

The statistical analyses of the data were conducted using the SAS program (SAS Institute 238

Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and were designed to account for the random design and sub-factorial 239

nature of the qPCR and re-isolation data. To quantify the bacteria, the obtained data were log-240

transformed to stabilize the variance. The bars represent the means +/- standard errors of four 241

replicates. The asterisks (* and **) indicate significant differences (α = 0.05 and 0.01, 242

respectively) according to Student's t test. 243

244

Results 245

Microscopy analysis of sugarcane interactions with the 33.1 and 33.1:pNKGFP strains 246

The behavior of the P. agglomerans 33.1 and 33.1:pNKGFP strains during their 247

interactions with micro-propagated sugarcane plants was evaluated using SEM. No bacteria or 248

fungi were observed in the control treatments on any of the observed samples (Fig. 1A). The 249

33.1 and 33.1:pNKGFP cells aggregated on the root surface (Fig. 1B, C and D). 250

The formation of a biofilm by 33.1:pNKGFP on the sugarcane root surfaces was observed 251

at all of the sampled points, as described above (Fig. 2A, C and E), but bacterial fluorescence 252

was observed only at 5 DAI (Fig. 2B). We observed a fluorescence reduction after this period but 253

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 12: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

11

not a reduction in the bacterial biofilm aggregate (Fig. 2D and F). The sugarcane samples also 254

showed auto-fluorescence; however, the presence of a few 33.1:pNKGFP cells fluorescing in the 255

bacterial aggregation is clearly visible. Otherwise, in the MS suspension, bacterial fluorescence 256

was not affected in the aggregated cells (data not shown). We did not observe fluorescent 257

bacterial cells inside of the sugarcane tissues, probably due to the loss of bacterial fluorescence 258

observed in the biofilm aggregation. 259

260

Monitoring of the 33.1:pNKGFP sugarcane cross-colonization using qPCR and re-isolation 261

To develop a qPCR technique to monitor P. agglomerans 33.1:pNKGFP in sugarcane, 262

the specificity of the designed set of primers was first tested using conventional PCR. The 263

primers PNKF and PNKRII were tested against plasmids and bacterial strains (Table 1) that were 264

specific to the tagged strain (Fig. 3A). No amplification was observed for the DNA of sugarcane 265

without 33.1:pNKGFP inoculation (data not shown). The 33.1:pNKGFP strain presented only 266

one insert of the plasmid (Fig. 3B); therefore, it was used for the quantification of P. 267

agglomerans in the sugarcane seedlings. 268

Using this qPCR technique under gnotobiotic conditions, we observed a higher number 269

of 33.1:pNKGFP cells in the rhizosphere and in sugarcane tissues at 15 DAI. The strain had 270

multiplied and moved from sugarcane roots to aerial parts by 15 DAI, increasing bacterial cell 271

density in aerial tissues and in root tissues (Fig. 4A). The number of bacterial cells detectable 272

with qPCR is similar to that detectable with re-isolation, and both techniques showed an increase 273

in the number of bacterial cells in the rhizosphere and aerial plant parts (Fig. 4B). 274

In the greenhouse assay, 33.1:pNKGFP was also able to colonize acclimated sugarcane 275

when added to the substrate. A greater number of tagged bacterial cells were observed in the 276

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 13: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

12

rhizosphere than in the aerial parts (Table 2). The density of the indigenous bacterial community 277

was not affected by the addition of 33.1:pNKGFP. A similar number of indigenous bacterial cells 278

were observed in the rhizosphere in all treatments, either with or without the bacterial addition of 279

strain 33.1 or 33.1:pNKGFP. 280

281

Plant-growth promotion 282

After substrate inoculation, P. agglomerans 33.1 significantly promoted the biomass 283

accumulation of the sugarcane plants (Fig. 5A, B). In var. SP80-1842, this result was observed in 284

only aerial plant tissues, whereas for var. SP80-3240, increased biomass accumulation was 285

observed in root tissues as well (Fig. 5B). For both sugarcane varieties, we observed that 286

bacterial inoculation induced chitinase and cellulase production in root tissues (Fig. 5D). 287

The 33.1 strain was able to solubilize two different phosphate sources. Calcium 288

phosphate was hydrolyzed to a greater extent by the 33.1 strain than was aluminum phosphate, 289

with SI values of 3.4 and 1.72, respectively. Even during phosphate solubilization, 33.1 showed 290

the capacity to produce IAA, generating approximately 100 µg/ml in the assessed conditions. 291

Nitrogen fixation by 33.1 was confirmed in all seven consecutive inoculations in the Nfb 292

medium. All of the incubations developed a halo under the medium surface; however, very little 293

nitrogenase activity (0.03 nmol/h ethylene) was detected by acetylene reduction. 294

295

Discussion 296

P. agglomerans (Erwinia herbicola) is a cosmopolitan bacterium that lives in diverse 297

environments, including soil (55, 83), water (50), insects (18) and humans (16). This species has 298

been found endophytically in many important crops (34), acting as a plant-growth promoter (2, 299

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 14: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

13

45, 46, 70, 79, 81, 85), biocontrol agent (4, 9, 59) and even a systemic resistance inducer (37, 44, 300

56). In this study, we evaluated the interactions of P. agglomerans with sugarcane, aiming to 301

confirm the bacterium’s capacity to cross-colonize this crop and to increase the growth and 302

fitness of sugarcane seedlings. The strain 33.1 was selected due to its identification as a growth 303

promoter in its original host, E. grandis (60). The mechanisms associated with plant-growth 304

promotion and cross-colonization in this bacterium had, however, not been previously described. 305

The 33.1 and 33.1:pNKGFP strains both interacted similarly with sugarcane, forming 306

aggregates around the roots and infecting their hosts through radicular fissures. Frequently, 307

endophytic bacteria live in the soil, and prior to systemic colonization, the bacterial cells attach 308

to the roots close to the fissures caused by lateral root emergence (13). Compant et al. (14) also 309

observed the presence of Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN at lateral root emergence sites, suggesting 310

that crack entry colonization occurred in grapevine plantlets in a similar manner to the 311

phenomenon previously observed with the same strain in potato plants (62). These results 312

suggest that endophytic bacteria, which are able to colonize different host plants, could use the 313

same approach in their first colonization step. Many endophytic species have a broad range of 314

hosts; Herbaspirillum seropedicae, for example, has been found in a wide variety of crops, 315

including sorghum, sugarcane, corn and other grasses (3, 53). An endophyte isolated from a 316

specific host family may colonize other plants, even plants in other families, suggesting a lack of 317

specificity to a particular host (84). For example, Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp342) isolated from 318

corn was able to colonize wheat, rice, Arabidopsis thaliana and Medicago sativa (20). Azoarcus 319

indigens isolated from a grass pasture also colonized rice and sorghum (24, 62, 71), and a 320

Burkholderia sp. isolated from onion colonized grapevine (15) and potato (52). 321

Using qPCR and re-isolation techniques, we demonstrated that P. agglomerans 33.1, 322

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 15: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

14

which was previously isolated from Eucalyptus plants, was able to grow in sugarcane seedlings 323

after systemic colonization. Endophytic bacteria are frequently found at a high concentration in 324

roots, and there is often a gradient of bacterial abundance from the roots to the stem and leaves 325

(43). These endophytes are hypothesized to colonize the root surface before colonizing the host 326

itself (30, 36, 64). Our data indicated that 33.1:pNKGFP has a preference for the rhizosphere 327

over the root and aerial parts of sugarcane, demonstrating typical endophytic behavior during 328

colonization. Under greenhouse conditions, this strain did not affect the density of the 329

endogenous bacterial community, but it was able to induce dry mass accumulation by IAA 330

production and phosphate solubilization. 331

Additionally, P. agglomerans 33.1 stimulated the production of chitinase and 332

endoglucanase by root tissues, with which the bacterial cells had more contact and stayed for a 333

longer time. During plant invasion, bacterial cells may produce hydrolytic enzymes that are 334

recognized by the plant, triggering the plant’s resistance system. Trotel-Aziz et al. (78) reported 335

an increase in the resistance of vines against Botrytis cinerea due to the augmentation of 336

chitinases and other compounds induced by the inoculation of the P. agglomerans strain PTA-337

AF1. 338

We demonstrated that 33.1, an endophytic bacterium that promotes the growth of E. 339

grandis, was able to cross-colonize and promote the growth of sugarcane. This bacterium also 340

induced the synthesis of chitinase and endoglucanase enzymes, which are associated with plant 341

protection against pathogens. Furthermore, new genes may be transferred to 33.1 to improve on 342

its wide range of benefits to host plants. Our results contribute to the understanding of the 343

interactions between plants and endophytes and demonstrate the viability of P. agglomerans 33.1 344

as an inoculant to improve sugarcane productivity. 345

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 16: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

15

346

Acknowledgements 347

This work was supported by a grant from the Foundation for Research Assistance, São 348

Paulo State, Brazil (Grant 2002/14143-3). We thank FAPESP for the fellowship to M.C.Q. 349

(Proc. no. 2005/53748-6) and P.B.R. (Proc. no. 2003/01438-8). We also thank Dr. Elliot W. 350

Kitajima (NAP/MEA/ESALQ) for providing the scanning electron microscope and other 351

facilities, as well as Dr. Sabrina Moutinho Chabregas from CTC (Piracicaba, SP, Brazil) for 352

research protocols, valuable discussions and supplying the micro-propagated sugarcane plants. 353

354

References 355

356

1. Araújo, W. L., W. Maccheroni Jr., C. I. Aguilar-Vildoso, P. A. V. Barroso, H. O. S., 357

and J. L. Azevedo. 2001. Variability and interactions between endophytic bacteria and 358

fungi isolated from leaf tissues of citrus rootstocks. Can. J. Microbiol. 47: 229–236. 359

2. Asis, C. A., and C. A. Adachi. 2003. Isolation of endophytic diazotroph Pantoea 360

agglomerans and nondiazotroph Enterobacter asburiae from sweetpotato stem in 361

Japan. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 38: 19–23. 362

3. Baldani, J. I., V. L. D. Baldani, L. Seldin, and J. Döbereiner. 1986. 363

Characterization of Herbaspirillum seropedicae gen. nov., sp. nov., a root-associated 364

nitrogen-fixing bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 36: 86–93. 365

4.Bardin, S. D., H. C. Huang, L. Liu, and L. J. Yanke. 2003 Control, by microbial seed 366

1. treatment, of damping-off caused by Pythium sp. on canola, safflower, dry pea, and 367

sugar beet. Can. J. Plant Sci. 25: 268–275. 368

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 17: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

16

5. Bassler, H. I., S. J. A. Flood, K. J. Livak, J. Marmaro, R. Knorr, and C.A. Batt. 369

1995. Use of fluorogenig probe in a PCR-base assay for the detection of Listeria 370

monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 3724-3728. 371

6. Bellis, P. D., L. Schena, and C. Cariddi. 2007. Real-time Scorpion-PCR detection 372

and quantification of Erwinia amylovora on pear leaves and flowers. Eur. J. Plant 373

Pathol.118: 11–22. 374

7. Boddey, R. M., S. Urquiaga, B. J. R. Alves, and V. Reis. 2003. Endophytic nitrogen 375

fixation in sugarcane: present knowledge and future applications. Plant Soil. 252: 139-376

149. 377

8. Boddey, R. M., S. Urquiaga, V. Reis, and J. Döbereiner. 1991. Biological nitrogen 378

fixation associated with sugar cane. Plant Soil. 137: 111–117. 379

9. Bonaterra, A., M. Mari, L. Casalini, and E. Montesinos. 2003. Biological control of 380

Monilinia laxa and Rhizopus stolonifer in postharvest of stone fruit by Pantoea 381

agglomerans EPS125 and putative mechanisms of antagonism. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 382

84: 93-104. 383

10. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of 384

microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. 385

Biochem. 72: 248–254. 386

11. Brandl, M. T., and R. E. Mandrell. 2002. Fitness of Salmonella enterica serovar 387

thompson in the cilantro phyllosphere, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 3614-3621, 388

12. Bric, J. M., R. M. Bostock, and S. E. Silverstone. 1991. Rapid in situ assay for 389

indoleacetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. 390

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57: 535-538. 391

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 18: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

17

13. Chi, F., S. H. Shen, H. P.Cheng, Y. X. Jing, Y. G. Yanni, and F. B. Dazzo, 2005. 392

Ascending migration of endophytic rhizobia, from roots to leaves, inside rice plants and 393

assessment of benefits to rice growth physiology. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 7271–394

7278. 395

14. Compant, S., B. Reiter, A. Sessitsch, J. Nowak, C. Clément, and E. A. Barka. 396

2005. Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by a plant growth-promoting bacterium, 397

Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 1685–1693. 398

15. Cubero, J. and J. H. Graham. 2002. Genetic relationship among worldwide strains 399

of Xanthomonas causing canker in citrus species and design of new primers for their 400

identification by PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 1257-1264. 401

16. de Champs, C., S. Le Seaux, J. J. Dubost, S. Boisgard, B. Sauvezie, and J. 402

Sirot. 2000. Isolation of Pantoea agglomerans in two cases of septic monoarthritis after 403

plant thorn and wood sliver injuries. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 460–461. 404

17. Desjardin, l. E., Y. Chen, M. D. Perkins, I. Teixeira, M.D. Cave, and K. D. 405

Eisennach. 1998. Comparison of the ABI 7700 system (Taqman) and competitive PCR 406

for quantification of IS 6110 DNA in sputum during treatment of tuberculosis. J. Clin. 407

Microbiol. 36: 1964-1968. 408

18. Dillon, R. J., C. T. Vennard, and A. K. Charnley. 2001. Exploitation of gut bacteria 409

in the locust. Nature. 403:851. 410

19. Döbereiner, J., V. L. D. Baldani, and J. I. Baldani. 1995. Como isolar e identificar 411

bactérias diazotróficas de plantas não-leguminosas. EMBRAPA-CNPAB, Rio de 412

Janeiro, RJ. 413

20. Dong, Y., A. L Iniguez, and E. W. Triplett. 2003. Quantitative assessments of the 414

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 19: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

18

host range and strain specificity of endophytic colonization by Klebsiella pneumoniae 415

342. Plant Soil. 257: 49–59. 416

21. Downing, K. J., G. Leslie, and J. Thomson. 2000. Biocontrol of the sugarcane 417

borer Eldana saccharina by expression of the Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Ac7 and 418

Serratia marcescens chiA genes in sugarcane-associated bacteria. Appl. Environ. 419

Microbiol. 66: 2804-2810. 420

22. Doyle, J. J. T., and J. L. Doyle. 1987. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. 421

Focus. 12: 13-15. 422

23. Duckett, J. G., and R. Ligrone. 2008. Basidiomycetous endophytes in New 423

Zealand Aneuraceae (simple thalloid liverworts, Metzgeriidae) and the derived status of 424

the monotypic genus Verdoornia. Botany. 86: 346-358. 425

24. Egener, T., T. Hurek, and B. Reinhold-Hurek. 1999. Endophytic expression of nif 426

genes of Azoarcus sp. strain BH72 in rice roots. Mol. Plant Microbe In. 12: 813–819. 427

25. Ferreira, A., M. C. Quecine1, P. T. Lacava, S. Oda, J. L. Azevedo, and W. L. 428

Araújo. 2008. Diversityof endophytic bacteria from Eucalyptus species seeds and 429

colonization of seedlings byPantoea agglomerans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 287: 8–14. 430

26. Ferreira Filho, A.S., M.C. Quecine, A.C. Bogas, P.B. Rossetto, A.O.S. Lima, P.T. 431

Lacava, J.L. Azevedo, and W.L.Araújo. 2012. Endophytic Methylobacterium 432

extorquens expresses a heterologous b-1,4-endoglucanase A (EglA) in Catharanthus 433

roseus seedlings, a model host plant for Xylella fastidiosa. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 434

28:1475–1481. 435

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 20: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

19

27. Gage, D. J., T. Bobo, and S. R. Long. 1996. Use of green fluorescent protein to 436

visualize the early events of symbiosis between Rhizobium meliloti and alfalfa 437

(Medicago sativa). J. Bacteriol. 178: 7159–7166. 438

28. Gunasinghe, R. N., C. J. Ikiriwatte, and A. M. Karunaratne. 2004. The use of 439

Pantoea agglomerans and Flavobacterium sp to control banana pathogens J. Hortic. 440

Sci. Biotech. 79: 1002-1006. 441

29. Guzzo, S. D., R. Harakava, K., Kida, E.M.F. Martins, and D. S. Roveratti. 1999. 442

Proteção de cafeeiros contra Hemileia vastatrix por cloreto de benzalcônio (composto 443

de amônio quaternário). Summa Phytopathologica. 25: 339–345. 444

30. Gyaneshwar, P., E. K. James, N. Mathan, P.M. Reddy, B. Reinhold-Hurek, and 445

J. K. Ladha. 2001. Endophytic colonization of rice by a diazotrophic strain of Serratia 446

marcescens. J. Bacteriol. 183: 2634–2645. 447

31. Hara, F.A.S., and L. A. Oliveira. 2004. Características fisiológicas e ecológicas de 448

isolados de rizóbios oriundos de solos ácidos e álicos de Presidente Figueiredo, 449

Amazonas. Acta Amazonica. 34: 343-357. 450

32. Hardoim, P. S., L. S. Van Overbeek, and J. D. Van Elsas. 2008. Properties of 451

bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol.16: 463-452

471. 453

33. Hardy, R. W. F., R. D. Holsten, E.K. Jackson, and R. C. Burns. 1968. The 454

acetylene-ethylene assay for N2 fixation: laboratory and field evaluation. Plant Physiol. 455

43: 1185–1207. 456

34. Hendre, R. R., R. S. Iver, M. Kotwal, S. S. Khuspe, and A. F. Mascarenhas. 1983. Rapid multiplication of 457

sugarcane by tissue culture. Sugar Cane. 1: 5-8. ?????? 458

35. Hsieh, T. F., H. C. Huang, and R. S. Erickson. 2005. Biological control of bacterial 459

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 21: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

20

wilt of bean using a bacterial endophyte, Pantoea agglomerans. J Phytopathology. 153: 460

608–614. 461

36. James, E. K., P. Gyaneshwar, N. Mathan, W. L. Barraquio, P. M. Reddy, P. P. M. 462

Iannetta, F. L. Olivares, and J. K. Ladha. 2002. Infection and colonization of rice 463

seedlings by the plant growth promoting bacterium Herbaspirillum seropedicae Z67. 464

Mol. Plant Microbe In. 15: 894–906. 465

37. Jeun, Y. C., K. S. Park, C. H. Kim, W. D. Fowler, and J. W. Kloepper. 2004. 466

Cytological observation of cucumber plants during induced resistance elicited by 467

rhizobacteria. Biol. Contr. 29: 39-42. 468

38. Kim, Y. C., J. Leveau, B. B. M. Gardener, E. A. Pierson, L. S. Pierson, and C.M. 469

Ryu. 2011. The multifactorial basis for plant health promotion by plant-associated 470

bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77: 1548–1555. 471

39. Kolter, R., M. Inuzuka, and D. R. Helinski. 1978. Trans-complementation 472

dependent replication of a low molecular weight origin fragment from plasmid R6K. Cell. 473

15: 1199–1208. 474

40. Kuchma, S. L., J. P. Connolly, and J. P. O'toole. 2005. Component regulatory 475

system regulates biofilm maturation and type III secretion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 476

J. Bacteriol. 187: 1441-1454. 477

41. Lacava, P. T., W. B. Li, W. L. Araújo, J. L. Azevedo, and J. S. Hartung, 2006. 478

Rapid, specific and quantitative assays for the detection of endophytic bacterium 479

Methylobacterium mesophilicum in inoculated plants. J. Microbiol. Meth. 65: 535-541. 480

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 22: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

21

42. Lacava, P. T., W. L. Araújo, and J. L. Azevedo. 2007. Evaluation of endophytic 481

colonization of Citrus sinensis and Catharanthus roseus seedlings by endophytic 482

bacteria. J. Microbiol. 45: 11-14. 483

43. Lamb, T. G., D. W. Tonkyn, and D. A. Kluepfel. 1996. Movement of Pseudomonas 484

aureofaciens from the rhizosphere to aerial plant tissue. Can. J. Microbiol. 42: 1112–485

1120. 486

44. Liu, L., J. W. Kloepper, and S. Tuzun. 1995. Induction of systemic resistance in 487

cucumber against Fusarium wilt by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. 488

Phytopathology. 85: 695-698. 489

45. Malboobi, M. A., M. Behbahani, H. Madani, P. Owlia, A. Deljou, B. Yakhchali, M. 490

Moradi, and H. Hassanabadi. 2009a. Performance evaluation of potent phosphate 491

solubilizing bacteria in potato rhizosphere. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25:1479-492

1484. 493

46. Malboobi, M. A., P. Owlia, M. Behbahani, E. Sarokhani, S. Moradi, B. Yakhchali, 494

A. Deljou, and K.M. Heravi. 2009b . Solubilization of organic and inorganic phosphates 495

by three highly, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25: 1471-1477. 496

47. Marefat, A., K. Ophel-Keller, and A. McKay. 2007. A real-time PCR assay for 497

detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. insidiosus in Lucerne. Australas. Plant 498

Pathol. 36: 262–269. 499

48. Marx, C. J., and M. E. Lidstrom. 2001. Development of improved versatile broad-500

host-range vectors for use in methylotrophs and other Gram-negative bacteria. 501

Microbiol. 147: 2065-2075. 502

49. Mirza, S. M., W. Ahmad, F. Latif, J. Haurat, R. Bally, P. Normand, and K. A. 503

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 23: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

22

Malik, 2001. Isolation, partial characterization, and the effect of plant growth-promoting 504

bacteria (PGPB) on micro-propagated sugarcane in vitro. Plant Soil. 237: 47–54. 505

50. Mosso, M. A., M. C. De La Rosa, C. Vivar, and M. R. Medina. 1994. Heterotrophic 506

bacterial populations in the mineral waters of thermal springs in Spain. J. Appl. 507

Microbiol. 77: 370–381. 508

51. Murashige, T., and F. A. Skoog. 1962. Revised medium for rapid growth and 509

bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum. 15: 473-497. 510

52. Nowak, J. 1998. Benefits of in vitro “biotization” of tissue cultures with microbial 511

inoculants. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 34: 122–130. 512

53. Olivares, F. L., V. L. D. Baldani, V. M. Reis, J. I. Baldani, and J. Döbereiner. 513

1996. Occurrence of the endophytic diazotrophs Herbaspirillum spp. in root, stems, and 514

leaves, predominantly of Gramineae. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 21: 197–200. 515

54. Oliveira, A. C., M. A. Vallim, C. P. Semighini, W. L. Araújo, G. H. Goldman, and 516

M. A. Machado. 2002. Quantification of Xylella fastidiosa from citrus trees by Real-Time 517

Polymerase Chain Reaction assay. Phytopathology. 92: 1048-1054. 518

55. Omar, A. M. N., P. Weinhard, and J. Balandreau. 1989. Using the spermosphere 519

model technique to describe the dominant nitrogen-fixing microflora associated with 520

wetland rice in two Egypt soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 7: 158–163. 521

56. Ongena, M., F. Daayf, P. Jacques, P. Thonart, N. Benhamou, T. C. Paulitz, and 522

R. R. Belanger. 2000. Systemic induction of phytoalexins in cucumber in response to 523

treatments with fluorescent pseudomonads. Plant Pathol. 49: 523–530. 524

57. Pahl, A., U. Kuhlbrandt, K. Brune, M. Rollinghoff, and A. Gressner. 1999. 525

Quantitative detection of Borrelia burgdorferi by real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 526

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 24: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

23

1958-1963. 527

58. Perron, C., J. Vieira, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors 528

and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 33: 529

103-119. 530

59. Plaza, P., J. Usall, J.L. Smilanick, N. Lamarca, and I. Vinas. 2004. Combining 531

Pantoea agglomerans (CPA-2) and curing treatments to control established infections of 532

Penicillium digitatum on lemons J. Food Protect. 67: 781-786. 533

60. Procópio, R. E. L., W. L. Araújo, W. Maccheroni-Jr., and J. L. Azevedo. 2009. 534

Characterization of an endophytic bacterial community associated with Eucalyptus spp. 535

Genet. Mol. Res. 8: 1408-1422. 536

61. Ramamoorthy, V., R. Viswanathan, T. Raguchander, V. Prakasam, and R. 537

Smaiyappan. 2001. Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth-promoting 538

rhizobacteria in crop plants against pests and diseases. Crop Protect. 20: 1–11. 539

62. Reinhold-Hurek, B., T. Hurek, M. Gillis, B. Hoste, M. Vancanneyt, K. Kersters, 540

and, J. De Ley. 1993. Azoarcus gen. nov., nitrogen-fixing proteobacteria associated 541

with roots of Kallar grass (Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth), and description of two species 542

Azoarcus indigens sp. nov. and Azoarcus communis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43: 543

574–584. 544

63. Rennie, R. J., J. R. De Freitas, A. P. Ruschel, and P. B. Vose. 1982. Isolation and 545

identification of N2-fixing bacteria associated with sugar cane (Saccharum sp.). Can. J. 546

Microbiol. 28: 462–467. 547

64. Roncato-Maccari, L. D. B., H. J. O. Ramos, F. O. Pedrosa,Y. Alquini, L. S. 548

Chubatsu,M.G. Yates, L.U. Rigo, M. B. R. Steffens, and E. M.Souza. 2003. 549

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 25: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

24

Endophytic Herbaspirillum seropedicae expresses nif genes in gramineous plants. 550

FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 45: 39–47. 551

65. Rossignol, M., A. Basset, O. Espeli, and F. Boccard. 2001. NKBOR, a mini-Tn10-552

based transposon for random insertion in the chromosome of Gram-negative bacteria 553

and the rapid recovery of sequences flanking the insertion sites in Escherichia coli. Res. 554

Microbiol. 152: 481-485. 555

66. Ruppel, S., C. Hecht-Buchholz, R. Remus, U. Ortmann, and R. Schmelzer. 556

1992. Settlement of the diazotrophic, phytoeffective bacterial strain Pantoea 557

agglomerans on and within winter wheat: An investigation using ELISA and 558

transmission electron microscopy. Plant Soil. 145: 261–273. 559

67. Ryan, R. P., K. Germaine, A. Franks, D. J. Ryan, and D. N. Dowling. 2008. 560

Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 278: 561

1–9. 562

68. Sambrook, J., D. W. Russel. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 563

Coordinating ed., Sambrook, J., D. W. Russel. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 564

New York, NY. 565

69. Shishido, M., C. Breuil, and C. P. Chanway. 1999. Endophytic colonization of 566

spruce by growth-promoting rhizobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 29: 191-196. 567

70. Singh, M., R. Kreutzer, G. Acker, and W. Klingmüller. 1988. Localization and 568

physical mapping of a plasmid-borne 23-kb nif gene cluster from Enterobacter 569

agglomerans showing homology to the entire nif gene cluster of Klebsiella pneumoniae 570

M5a1 Plasmid.19: 1-12. 571

71. Stein, T., N. Hayen-Schneg, and I. Fendrik. 1997. Contribution of BNF by 572

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 26: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

25

Azoarcus sp. BH72 in Sorghum vulgare. Soil Biol. Biochem. 29: 969–971. 573

72. Sturz, A. V., B. R. Christie, and J. Nowak. 2000. Bacterial endophytes: potential 574

role in developing sustainable systems of crop production. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 19: 1–575

30. 576

73. Subaran, M., E. Pérez, M. M. Ball, A. Bahsas, and L. A. Yarzabal. 2009. 577

Characterization of the mineral phosphate-solubilizing activity of Pantoea agglomerans 578

MMB051 isolated from an iron-rich soil in Southeastern Venezuela (Bolıvar State). Curr. 579

Microbiol. 58: 378–383. 580

74. Taylor, L. A., and R. E. Rose. 1988. A correction in the nucleotide sequence of the 581

Tn903 kanamycin resistance determinant in pUC4K. Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 358. 582

75. Tombolini, R., A. Unge, M. E. Davey, F. J. de Bruijn, and J. K. Jansson. 1997. 583

Flow cytometric and microscopic analysis of GFP-tagged Pseudomonas fluorescens 584

bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 22: 17–28. 585

76. Tombolini, R., and J. K. Jansson. 1998. Monitoring of GFP-tagged bacterial cells, 586

p. 285–298. In R. A. LaRossa (ed.), Methods in molecular biology. Bioluminescence 587

methods and protocols. Humana Press Inc., Totowa, N.J. 588

77. Torres, A.R., W.L. Araujo, L. Cursino, M. Hungria, F. Plotegher, F. L. Mostasso, 589

and J. L. Azevedo. 2008. Diversity of endophytic enterobacteria associated with 590

different host plants. J. Microbiol. 46: 373-379. 591

78. Trotel-Aziz, P., M. Couderchet, S. Biagianti, and A. Aziz. 2008. Characterization 592

of new bacterial biocontrol agents Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Pantoea and Pseudomonas 593

spp. mediating grapevine resistance against Botrytis cinerea. Environ. Exp. Bot. 64: 21–594

32. 595

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 27: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

26

79. Tsavkelova, E. A., T. A. Cherdyntseva, S.G. Botina, and A. I. Netrusov. 2007. 596

Bacteria associated with orchid roots and microbial production of auxin. Microbiol. Res. 597

162: 69-76. 598

80. Verma, S. C., A. Singh, S.P. Chowdhury, and A. K. Tripathi. 2004. Endophytic 599

colonization ability of two deep-water rice endophytes, Pantoea sp. and Ochrobactrum 600

sp., using green fluorescent protein reporter. Biotechnol. Lett. 26: 425–429. 601

81. Verma, S. C., J. K. Ladha, and A. K. Tripathi. 2001. Evaluation of plant growth 602

promoting and colonization ability of endophytic diazotrophs from deep water rice. J. 603

Biotechnol. 91: 127–141. 604

82. Weller, A., J. G. Elphinstone, N. C.Smith, N. Boonham, and D. E. Stead. 2000. 605

Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum strains with a quantitative, multiplex, real-time, 606

fluorogenic PCR (TaqMan) assay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 2853-2858. 607

83. Yeung, K. F., K. M. Lee, and R. W. Woodard. 1998. Isolation and identification of 608

two l-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid-degrading soil microorganisms, Enterobacter 609

agglomerans and Enterobacter amnigenus. J. Nat. Prod. 61: 207–211. 610

84. Zakria, K. U., T. Ogawa, A. Yamamoto, Y. Saeki, and S. Akao. 2008. Influence of 611

inoculation technique on the endophytic colonization of rice by Pantoea sp. isolated 612

from sweet potato and by Enterobacter sp. isolated from sugarcane Muhammad. Soil 613

Sci. Plant Nutr. 54: 224–236. 614

85. Zimmer, W., B. Hundeshagen, and E. Niederau. 1994. Demonstration of the 615

indolepyruvate decarboxylase gene homologous in different auxin producing species of 616

the Enterobacteriaceae. Can. J. Microbiol. 40: 1072–1076. 617

618

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 28: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

27

TABLE 1. Plasmids and strains used in this work. 619

620

621

622

623

624

625

626

627

628

629

630

631

632

633

634

635

636

637

638

639

640

641

Plasmids and Strains Description References

Plasmids

pNKBOR Knr miniTn10 Rossignol et al. (65)

pNKGFP Knr miniTn10, gfp Ferreira et al. (25)

pUC18 Amp r Perron et al. (58)

pCM88 Tet r , gfp Marx and Lindstrom (48)

pSMC21 Ap r , Kn r ,gfp Kuchma et al. (40)

pUC4K Kn r Taylor; Rose (74)

pJTT Kn r cry1Ac7 Downing et al. (21)

pGEMT-easy Amp r Promega

pWM1013 Kn r , desred Brandl and Mandrell (11)

Strains

DH5-α - λ pir recA1 endA1 hsdR1 relA1

λ::pir

Kolter et al. (39)

33.1 Strain from Eucalipto grandis. Procópio (60)

33.1;pNKBOR 33.1 harboring pNKBOR This work

33.1:pNKGFP 33.1 harboring pNKGFP Ferreira et al. (25)

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 29: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

28

TABLE 2. Density of sugarcane-associated bacteria measured using re-isolation. 642

643

a The 33.1:pNKGFP density was measured at 30 DAI. Values with the same letter within a 644

column are not significantly different (P > 0.005) according to Tukey’s test, which was 645

conducted with the SAS program (release 9.1). The results are the means of four replicates of 646

each sample. 647

b The bacterial density was measured at 30 DAI with 33.1 or 33.1:pNKGFP. The treatment 648

control contained an inoculation of PBS medium without bacterial cells. Values with the same 649

letter within a column are not significantly different (P > 0.005), according to the Tukey test 650

conducted with the SAS System (release 9.1). The results are the means of four replicates of each 651

sample. 652

653

Samples 33.1:pNKGFP density

Bacterial density

(CFU/gram of sample)b

(CFU/gram of sample)a Control 33.1 33.1:pNKGFP

Rhizosphere 2,9 x105 a 8,6x105A 12,4x105A 18,4x105 A

Root 4,3x102 b 7,1x105A 10,5x105A 4,5x105AB

Aerial part 2,2 x101 b 2.2x103B 1,4x103 B 1,5x103B

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 30: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

29

FIG. 1. Sugarcane infection and root surface biofilm formation by 33.1 and 33.1:pNKGFP. 654

Control (A), 33.1 bacterial cells during root infection through rooting fissures, indicated by the 655

white arrow (B), and biofilm formation by 33.1 (C) and 33.1:pNKGFP (D) on the sugarcane root 656

surface. The samples were collected at three days after inoculation. The scanning electron 657

microscopy magnification was 500X in A, 1500X in B and D and 3000X in C. Scale bar: 20 µm 658

in A and D and 10 µm in B and C. 659

660

661

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 31: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

30

FIG. 2. Visualization of 33.1:pNKGFP cells during biofilm formation on the sugarcane root 662

surface using light microscopy at 5 (A), 10 (C) and 18 DAI (E) and fluorescence microscopy 663

under a FITC (510 nm) filter to visualize the decrease in fluorescence at each respective time (B, 664

D and F).The arrows indicate the 33.1:pNKGFP bacterial cells that expressed GFP. The 665

microscopy magnification was 200X and the scale bar: 10 µm. 666

667

668

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 32: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

31

FIG. 3. Specificity of conventional PCR with the PNKF and PNKRII primer set for the detection 669

of P. agglomerans 33.1:pNKGFP. (A) 1 - plasmid pNKBOR, 2 - plasmid pNKGFP, 3 - plasmid 670

pUC18, 4 – plasmid pCM88, 5 – plasmid pSMC21, 6 – plasmid pUC4K, 7- plasmid pJTT, 8 – 671

plasmid pGEMT-easy, 9 – plasmid pWM1013, 10 – 33.1:pNKBOR, 11 – 33.1:pNKGFP, 12 – 672

33.1, M – 100-bp DNA ladder (Fermentas). The PCR product, indicated by the arrow, is 360 bp. 673

(B) Integration of the pNKGFP fragment into the P. agglomerans 33.1 chromosome, confirmed 674

with Southern blot analysis of the plasmid and chromosomal DNAs cut with EcoRI and probed 675

with the 360 bp amplicon fragment obtained from a PCR reaction using the primers PNKF and 676

PNKRII. 1 - 33.1, 2 – plasmid pNKGFP and 3- 33.1:pNKGFP. 677

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 33: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

32

FIG. 4. P. agglomerans 33.1:pNKGFP density during sugarcane cross-colonization, measured 678

using qPCR (A) and re-isolation (B) at 4 and 15 DAI. The abundance data, in CFU/g of tissue, 679

were log-transformed to stabilize the variance. The results are the means of the four replicates for 680

each sample. The bars represent the standard error of each treatment. 681

682

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 34: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

33

FIG. 5. Sugarcane plant-growth promotion by P. agglomerans 33.1. The strain was added to the 683

substrate of acclimated (A) SP80-1842 and (B) SP80-3240 sugarcane. The data are the average 684

dried weights at 30 DAI. The bars represent the standard error of each treatment. The values with 685

asterisks (**) in the same tissue and varieties are significantly different (α = 0.01) from the 686

control according to Student’s t test. (C) Sugarcane variety SP80-1842 without (left) and with 687

33.1 inoculation (right). (D) Sugarcane resistance-protein production. a The index of enzymatic 688

activity was calculated based on the absorbance/ml of substrate/h. The values with asterisks (* or 689

**) are significantly different from the control treatment (α = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively) 690

according to Student’s t test. 691

692

693

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 35: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

34

694

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 36: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

35

695

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 37: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 38: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 39: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 40: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 41: 0 TITLE: Sugarcane growth promotion by the endophytic bacterium

on March 16, 2018 by guest

http://aem.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from