Upload
izzah-zahin
View
437
Download
9
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Temporary Occupation License, Hak milik tanah sementara
Citation preview
TEMPORARY OCCUPATION LICENCE
Sharifah Zubaidah21st March 2012
What We Will Cover:
• 1) Meaning of T.O.L• 2) Nature of T.O.L• 3) Power to grant T.O.L.• 4) Period of T.O.L. and Right to Renew• 5) Rights of a T.O.L. Holder• 6) Restrictions of a T.O.L.• 7) Termination of T.O.L.• 8) Special Purpose T.O.L.
MEANING:
• “a permission granted by the State Authority to any person or body for the purpose of a
specified activity on the land, without which, the person or body
would be deemed an unlawful occupier”
• (Prof. Nik Abdul Rashid, 1978)
Nature of T.O.L.
Licence to occupy.
Limited duration.
Specified purpose.
Discretion of State Authority to renew.
Power to Grant
Power of State Authority(ss.65-69 NLC)
State land,Reserved land,Mining land.
Power to grant and renew exercised bythe Land
Administratoron behalf of SA.
Period of T.O.L.
• S.67:
• ‘for a term expiring no later than the end of the calendar year in which it commences’
• It is not accurate to say that the duration of a TOL is one calendar year (12 months).
Form for T.O.L.
• See Form 4A at the back of your NLC.
• Prescribed by s.67.
Short period restricts types of activities on TOL land
• Cannot erect ‘permanent buildings’
• Cannot plant ‘permanent crops’
Right to Renew
• S. 67(3)• No automatic renewal.• Must apply before
expiry.
• “There is provision for the TOL to be renewed annually but there is no obligation on the part of the authorities to grant a renewal of a TOL for any subsequent year.”
• (Teh Bee v K. Maruthamuthu)
Expiry of TOL and Effect of Failure to Renew
• Land goes back to the State.• Ex-TOL holder becomes unlawful occupier of
State land.• Liable to be prosecuted under s. 425 NLC• See: PP v Yap Tai
Rights of a TOL Holder
• 1) To possess and enjoy the land. (s. 44(1) NLC)
• Therefore: right to sue for trespass.
• See Julaika Bivi v Maidin(1961)
• 2) Right to Grant a tenancy on TOL land or rooms in buildings on TOL land.
• Govindaraju v Krishnan• Ban Seng v Yap Pek Soo• Tindok Besar Estate v
Tinjar Co.
• 3) Right to renew the TOL. (s. 67(2) NLC and Teh Bee’s case)
RESTRICTIONS OF A TOL
A TOL CANNOT be transferred or assigned (s.68)
• Hee Cheng v Krishnan• P’s application for
specific performance of a contract to sell the defendant’s rights in a TOL land and a house built on TOL land was dismissed.
• Contract was an illegal contract under s.24(e) of the Contracts Act.
• Paruvathy v Krishnan
A contract to sell a house built on TOL land not by the TOL holder is valid
• Cheo Lean How v Fock Fong Looi