Upload
oscar-chase
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The State of Our School
CRANFORD HIGH SCHOOL2014
“Where we are … and where we’re going.”Kate McCabe, Principal
CRANFORD HIGH SCHOOL
2014 Newsweek Top National High Schools # 123 ( 2012 rank #206)
2014 The Washington Post Top National High Schools # 567 ( #8 in New Jersey )
2014 NJ Monthly Top NJ High Schools # 49 (2012 rank #51) (rankings released every two
years)
NJ Monthly Methodology Changes
the new adjusted cohort graduation rate;
elimination of data of students going on to four-year colleges, two-year colleges and other postsecondary schools;
elimination of student/computer ratio as a factor;
increased weighting for data on test results and the aforementioned graduation-rate calculation
NJ MONTHLY RANKING
YearGrade
12 Enrollment
Avg. ClassSize
Student Faculty
Ratio
% Faculty with
Masters or
Doctorate
Avg. Comb.SAT Score
% Adv.Prof. HSPA
LA
% Adv. Prof: HSPA
Combined
% Scoring 1550 Or Above
On SAT
% Adv.Prof. HSPAMath
# Of AP
Tests Offered
% Students Taking At Least One
AP Test
% AP Test
Takers Scoring
3+
Adj.Cohort Grad.Rate
% Enrolled
In College 16 Mos.
After HS
CHS 2014 270 Not factored 11.4
Not factored
Not factored
Not factored 39 57.8
Not factored 24 45.8 81.8 98 82
CHS 2012 261 20.3 9.9 37.7 1605 40.8 Not factoredNot
factored 43.5 27Not
factored 80.7 93.11Not
factored
Top 20 Mean
2014 273Not
factored 9.68 Not factored
Not factored
Not factored 47.5 71.4
Not factored 19 39.46 89.4 98 88.3
ADVANCED PLACEMENT
Year
% of student population taking AP
courses/exams
# of tests
offered
# of test
takers
# of tests
taken
% scored
3+
% scored
4+
% scored
5Mean
2009-2010 28.0 26 323 643 77.0 49.8 24.6 3.428
2010-2011 32.7 27 367 727 80.3 55.6 25.3 3.564
2011-2012 33.8 26 384 789 81.5 57.9 29.3 3.629
2012-2013 35.9 26 384 804 80.6 53.4 23.1 3.510
2013-14 45.8 24 403 884 78.4 56.5 21.9 3.45
2014-15(Projected)
40.4 27 457
HSPA LANGUAGE ARTS
%Partial Proficient
%Proficient
%Advanced Proficient
%Proficient + Advanced
2009-2010 CRANFORD 5.2 62.2 32.6 94.8
DFG I 3.8 61.9 34.3 96.2
2010-2011 CRANFORD 4.1 55.1 40.8 95.9
DFG I 3.5 59.4 37.1 96.5
2011-2012 CRANFORD 1.8 61.4 36.8 98.2
DFG I 2.7 59.4 38.0 97.4
2012-2013 CRANFORD 2.5 45.4 52.1 97.5
DFG I 2.6 52.1 45.4 97.5
2013-2014 CRANFORD 1 41.1 57.9 99
DFG I 1.9 43.1 55.1 98.2
HSPAMATHEMATICS
%Partial
Proficient
%Proficient
%Advanced Proficient
%Proficient
+ Advanced
2009-2010 CRANFORD 18.1 45.3 36.6 81.9
DFG I 10.8 46.5 42.7 89.2
2010-2011 CRANFORD 10.5 45.9 43.5 89.4
DFG I 11.1 45.5 43.4 88.9
2011-2012 CRANFORD 8.5 51.5 40.1 91.6
DFG I 8.9 44.4 46.7 91.1
2012-2013 CRANFORD 7.2 48.0 44.8 92.8
DFG I 8.6 42.9 48.5 91.4
2013-14 CRANFORD 10.7 49.7 39.6 89.3
DFGI 8.2 41.8 50 91.8
NATIONAL MERIT SCHOLARSHIP COMPETITION
Graduation Year
Class Size
# Tested
# of Finalists
# of Semi-
finalists
# of Commended
# of Recognized
% of Class Tested
% of Test
Takers Recognized
% of Class
Recognized
2010 273 184 0 0 5 5 67.40% 2.72% 1.83%
2011 277 198 0 0 4 4 71.48% 2.02% 1.44%
2012 284 212 4 0 14 18 74.65% 8.49% 6.34%
2013 269 211 1 0 13 14 78.44% 6.64% 5.20%
2014 296 217 TBD 1 11 12 73.3% 5% 4%
SATSCHOOL
YearVerbalCHS
VerbalDFG
(State 2013-14)
MathCHS
MathDFG
(State 2013-14)
EssayCHS
EssayDFG (State
2013-14)
CHS Mean
DFGMean (State
2013-14)
2009- 2010
511 546 532 574 513 555 1556 1675
2010- 2011
529 543 542 570 534 552 1605 1665
2011-2012
559 534* 583 560* 571 538* 1713 1633*
2012-2013
547 NA 560 NA 560 NA 1666 NA
2013-2014
550 501 568 523 561 502 1679 1526
* Starting in 2011-2012 a DFG average was replaced with Peer Groups.
SATUNIVERSITY PROGRAM
Year Verbal Math Writing Combined
2009 699 711 691 2101
2010 652 667 657 1976
2011 659 688 678 2026
2012 673 686 6842043
2013 673 675 695 2044
2014 666 696 682 2044
ACT
Subject Area Test 2012CHS
(n=81)
2012State
2013CHS
(n=71)
2013State
2014CHS
2014State
English 23.9 23.1 23.4 22.5 26.1 22.8
Mathematics 24.7 23.9 24.7 23.6 26.7 23.7
Reading 24.3 23.4 24.0 23.1 25.6 23.1
Science 23.1 22.6 22.7 22.2 24.3 22.4
Composite 24.0 23.4 23.8 23.0 25.8 23.1
“Success is achieved. It is not stumbled upon in thecourse of amusing oneself. It is built upon tenacity and
discipline of purpose.” Author Unknown
CRANFORD HIGH SCHOOLGOALS
Continue to reflect on data and improve student achievement in HSPA, AP, SAT, and ACT
Continue to seek ways to develop programs and course offerings in order to personalize and expand opportunities for increased rigor and engagement for all students