74
© T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity Spatial distributions Race and society in LA Religion Catholic tradition Others Inter-Personal socio-cultural traits Industrial history & geography

© T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity Spatial distributions Race

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

TODAY•R -> U migration continued•Development Geographies

Economic & Social indicators•Race and ethnicity

Spatial distributionsRace and society in LA

•ReligionCatholic traditionOthers

• Inter-Personal socio-cultural traits• Industrial history & geography

Page 2: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Who migrates?•Age

•Gender

•Marital status

•Education level

•Personal

•Ethnicity

Page 3: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

How do migrants move?

•Migration patterns Role of information Role of social networksRole of “steps”Role of distance and costs

Page 4: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Social Geography & Development: Wealth

•Average wealth in GDP (in PPP)/capitaWorld average ~ $9,940Lesser developed ~ $4,760-5,480USA ~ $44,260

Page 5: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Social Geography & Development: Wealth II

•LA average GDP/capita ~ $8,630

•Extremes of GDP/capita in LA (< $5,000)Low

Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala Jamaica, Haiti (<$1,500!)Ecuador, Bolivia, Paraguay

> LA average GDP/capita (> $8,500)Costa Rica, MexicoArgentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay

Page 6: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Percent population living on <$2/day

•World average > 50%

•Latin American average ~ 24%Countries with > 30%

Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala, El Salvador,

Jamaica, Haiti, Bolivia, Ecuador, Paraguay

Countries with fewer than LA averageCosta Rica, MexicoArgentina, Brazil, Uruguay Chile

Page 7: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

GDP/capita

Page 8: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Wealth distribution I•USA

Richest 20% have 40% of all incomePoorest 20% have 5% 65% in middle class

•GINI coefficientsUSA ~ 41Mexico ~46Bolivia ~60Brazil ~56Guatemala ~60

Page 9: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Wealth distribution II•Latin America

Richest 20% have 50-65% of all income

Poorest 20% have 2-5%30% in the middleCountries with top 20% with more

than 50% of all incomeBrazil, Panama, Costa Rica, Argentina, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela

•Changing over time

•Varies within countries

Page 10: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 11: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 12: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 13: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 14: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 15: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Social development indicators

•The Human Development Index

•Safe water access

•Population to hospital bed ratio

•% of children < age 5 underweight

•Overall worst levels of human developmentBolivia; Ecuador; Paraguay; PeruEl Salvador; Guatemala; Honduras;

NicaraguaDominican Republic; Haiti

Page 16: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Race & Ethnicity•Colonial legacy of population

holocaust, slavery, and miscegenation

•Post-colonial migrations — much in 19th CenturyAsianEuropean

•=> complex map

Page 17: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Current ethnic distributions

•Afro-American (Latin Americans are “Americans,” too)BrazilCircum-Caribbean (Garifuna)

•AmerindianFormer high culture areas of

Mesoamerica and Andes

•Mestizo: Mexico & CA; South America & Brazil

•Euro-American: Costa Rica; Southern Cone

Page 18: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 19: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

African HeritageAmerindian

Euroamerican

Mestizo

Page 20: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

Garifuna

Garifuna

African Heritage

Amerindian

Euroamerican

Mestizo

Page 21: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 22: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 23: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 24: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Race in Latin America•Racial mixing

•Racial “bleaching”

•Racism

•“Social” races

•Indigenismo & Négritude

Page 25: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

17th C “casta” image

Page 26: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

17th C “casta” image

Page 28: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 29: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Catholic Heritage I•Spanish Catholic roots •Spiritual conquest — an integral

part of the conquest of the Americas

•Legacy of Church’s history in Latin AmericaIdentified with power/economic elite

Reform in form of liberation theology => oppression of the poor is a sin

Page 30: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Catholic Heritage II•Overwhelmingly people say “soy

Catholico” = “I am a Catholic” Church attendance is often lowBut presence is everywhere

•“Folk” Catholicism — merging of Roman Catholic ritual and beliefs with indigenous (Amerindian) beliefs (syncretism)

•Roman Catholic beliefs have merged with (or been used to mask) various African religious traditions in the Caribbean and Brazil especially

Page 31: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 32: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 33: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 34: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 35: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 36: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 37: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 38: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 39: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 40: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 41: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 42: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 43: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 44: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 45: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 46: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 47: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 48: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 49: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 50: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 51: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 52: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 53: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 54: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 55: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 56: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

Obatala known as the parent of the Orishas and all human kind. The saint he represents is "Our lady of Mercy“

© 2005-2006 www.santeriareligion101.com

Page 57: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

Lukumi (Santería) Altar©2000 Latitude International Products

Page 58: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 59: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Religion: Non-Catholic•Hindu and Islam — imported with indentured

labor to Suriname, Guiana, Trinidad & Tobago mostly (but minorities in all of the Caribbean)

• Judaism — accompanied 1st migrants from Spain (conversos)

•Evangelical Protestants — Protestants outlawed in Spanish/Portuguese colonial timesVery rapid growth in past few decades~40% of Guatemala~1/3 of Brazil

Page 60: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

The Mosque of Omar Ibn Al-Khattab in La Guajira, Colombia. It is the second biggest mosque in Latin America.

Page 61: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 62: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 63: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 64: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 65: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 66: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 67: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Inter-Personal socio-cultural traits

•Machismo — men in control of their lives and the lives of others in their lives

•Marianismo — roughly the inverse of machismo (from the idea that the ideal woman resembles Mary in her virtue and purity)

•Role conflict (e.g., casas chicas)

•“Personalismo” — much of social, economic, indeed all life in LA depends on social/family ties & personal spheres of influence and obligation

Page 68: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Industrialization in the late 19th Century — up through

WWII•Export Processing Industrialization (a

follow on from colonial patterns)

•Low technology manufacture of basic consumer goods

•Era of WW I; Great Depression; through WW II

Page 69: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI) (1940s

— 1970s)•Legitimized by Argentine economist

Raul Prebish in 1940 and adopted as official policy by the UN after WWII

Page 70: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

How ISI works• Imposed quotas or tariffs to increase

the price of imported manufactured goods

• Idea is to stimulate local industries

•NOT a new idea

Page 71: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Consequences of previous rounds of industrialization

•A legacy of: Colonial; 19th C; and especially ISI industrialization

•Spatially uneven: largest states benefit most

•Smaller states forced to band together

Page 72: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race
Page 73: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Economic & other assumptions of ISI• Presumes that “under development” is partly

the result of uneven terms of trade between LA and the more developed Atlantic world

• Isolating the country’s economy from the wider world’s economy will allow it to develop without the pressures from the Atlantic World

• Attempt to recreate a mini-model of the economy of more developed states

• Strongly involve the state in economic activities via state enterprises etc.

Page 74: © T. M. Whitmore TODAY R -> U migration continued Development Geographies  Economic & Social indicators Race and ethnicity  Spatial distributions  Race

© T. M. Whitmore

Problems with ISI• Role of modern technology in ISI

• Role of changed imports in ISI

• Role of foreign control in ISI

• Role of role of governments in ISI

• Inefficient management due to lack of competition

• Loans to do all this not easily repaid => demands to “restructure” economy”