30
PRESENTED BY Muhammad Asif Nadeem Department of Education I.U.B

PRESENTED BY Muhammad Asif Nadeem Department of Education I.U.B

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

PRESENTED BY Muhammad Asif Nadeem Department of Education I.U.B

Page 2: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B
Page 3: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

SOLO Taxonomy Structure of

Observed

Learning

Outcomes

Page 4: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

There are a number of ‘levels’ at which we can classify a student response to an examination question

Pre-structual Uni-structural . Multi structural Relational . Extended abstract

.

Page 5: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

here students are simply acquiring bits of unconnected information, which have no organisation and make no sense.

Page 6: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

This set of responses uses only one relevant element of data from the stimulus item.

A feature of responses at this level is the desire to close quickly and to ignore inconsistencies that may result from the response

Page 7: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

The learner at this level can use multiple data elements, but the elements are not integrated.

Hence the response can consist of a number of discrete closures.

Typical of these responses would be the following of strict algorithmic procedures that involve a number of steps. However, if a single step was forgotten, or an error made, the respondent would be unable to reconstruct the algorithm.

This lack of an overview of the data elements and their relationships makes the response patterns inherently unstable and thus considerable variability may be expected from children responding at this level.

Page 8: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

A relational response reflects the ability to integrate the elements and operations of the question in a way that enables an overview of the stimulus item

Children using an algorithm at this level would be able to check for errors and inconsistencies, and would be able to reconstruct missing elements of the algorithm.

Features of responses at this level include the ability to reverse operations and the set of elements used are internal to the system

Page 9: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

The use of data elements external to the system is a feature of an extended abstract response.

The generalisation of the elements takes account of new and more abstract features.

Page 10: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

SOLO is used to:Plan for differentiation;Give and receive feedback;Develop self-assessment resources;Design innovative curriculum;Reflect on learning processes and products;Undertake research and student led inquiry;Integrate e-learning and thinking strategies;Establish a school wide common language for learning.

Page 11: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B
Page 12: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Level of Outcome

Indicators

1 Prestructural Use of irrelevant information, or no meaningful response

2 Unistructural Focuses on one relevant aspect only.

3 Multistructural Focuses on several relevant aspects, but they are not co-ordinated together.

4 Relational The several parts are integrated into a coherent whole: details are linked to conclusion; meaning understood

5 Extended Abstract

Answer generalises the structure beyond the information given: Higher order principles are used to bring in a new and broader set of issues

Page 13: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Rote learned responses have no level For every new task you will need to progress

through each level. You may use experiences from one task to assist

in moving through levels in another related task. You cannot respond at level N unless you have

moved through level N-1 Teachers sometimes use strategies that lead to

‘level reduction’. That is assist students to ‘get the answer right’ but do not improve understanding.

Page 14: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

We can use SOLO to develop a marking scale for open ended responses

Imagine the essay topic:

What I did on the weekend

Page 15: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Uni-structural

On the weekend I went to grandma’s house

Page 16: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Multi-structural

I went to grandma’s house and I watched football and I played with my friends and I had ice-cream on Sunday and I helped with the harvest.

Page 17: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Relational

We were going to the beach but it started to rain so we decided to go to grandma’s house. It was lucky we decided not to go to the beach because the road flooded during the storm and we would not have been able to get home until the next day.

Page 18: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Add 5+6 Make a fraction Using 2 and 3 Which is solved first a) [ ] b) { } c) ( ) d) ______

Page 19: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Solve 2+3 x 5

Write fraction for shaded portion In which order brackets should be solved a) [ ], ( ), { } b) { }, ( ), [ ] c) [ ], { }, ( ) d) ( ), { }, [ ]

   

  

Page 20: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

A person went to market he purchased 3 apples at the rate of 5 rupees per apple. After purchase he has 2 rupees in his pocket . Find the amount with which he went to market?

Solution for the expression 10 + [{ ( 5 + 7) x 2 } + 3 ] is

a) 32 b) 47 c) 37 d) 67

Page 21: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Prestructural:

Misses the point Completely incorrect solution Inappropriate or few issues identified.

No framework for discussion and little relevant material selected. Poor structure to the essay. Irrelevant detail and some misinterpretation of the question. Little logical relationship to the topic and poor use of examples.

Page 22: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Uni structural: State, Recognise, Recall, Quote, Note,

Name Correct answer to simple algorithmic problem

requiring substitution of data into formula. Correct solution of one part of more complex

problem. Poor essay structure. One issue

identified and this becomes the sole focus; no framework for organizing discussion. Dogmatic presentation of a single solution to the set task. This idea may be restated in different ways. Little support from the literature.

Page 23: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Multi structural: Explain, Define, List, Solve, Describe, Interpret Correct solution to multiple part problem

requiring substitution of data from one part to the next.

Poorly structured project report or practical report on open task.

Essay poorly structured. A range of material has been selected and most of the material selected is appropriate. Weak introduction and conclusion. Little attempt to provide a clear logical structure. Focus on a large number of facts with little attempt at conceptual explanations. Very little linking of material between sections in the essay or report.

Page 24: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Between Multi structural & Relational Solution to multiple part problem with most parts correctly

solved but some errors. Reasonably well structured project or practical report on open

task. Essay fairly well structured. Some issues

identified. Attempt at a limited framework. Most of the material selected is appropriate. Introduction and conclusion exists. Logical presentation attempted and successful in a limited way. Some structure to the argument but only limited number of differing views and no new ideas.

Page 25: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Relational: Apply, Outline, Distinguish, Analyse, Classify, Contrast,

Summarise, Categorise

Elegant solution to complex problem requiring identification of variables to be evaluated or hypotheses to be tested.Well structured project or practical report on open task.

Essay well structured with a clear introduction and conclusion. Framework exists which is well developed. Appropriate material. Content has logical flow, with ideas clearly expressed. Clearly identifiable structure to the argument with discussion of differing

views.

Page 26: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Extended Abstract: Create, Synthesise, Hypothesise, Validate, Predict, Debate,

Theorise

Solution to problem which goes beyond anticipated answer.

Project or practical report dealing with real world ill-defined topic.

Well structured essay with clear introduction and conclusion. Issues clearly identified; clear framework for organizing discussion; appropriate material selected. Evidence of wide reading from many sources. Clear evidence of sophisticated analysis or innovative thinking.

Page 27: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

Level of Response Structure Marks

Extended Abstract

10

Relational 8

6-7

Multi structural 5 2-4

Uni structural I 1Pre structural 0

Page 28: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

28

A way of thinking about these issues.Implications for test design

Students

Questions

Worse Better

Easy Hard

X X XXX X

Q QQ Q Q

Situation 2Situation 2

Students

Questions

Worse Better

Easy Hard

x

QQ Q

Situation 1Situation 1

Page 29: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B

29

Situation 3Situation 3

X X X X X X XX X X X

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q

Worse

Easy

Better

Hard

Students

Questions

Situation 4Situation 4

X X X X XXX X X

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q

Worse

Easy

Better

HardQuestions

Students

Page 30: PRESENTED BY  Muhammad Asif Nadeem  Department of Education  I.U.B