Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Additional Information Supplementing
October 2009 Comments on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
16 CFR Part 310 Telemarketing Sales Rule
Debt Relief Amendments, R411001
- Prepared By -Scott Johnson
CEO - US Debt Resolve
US Debt Resolve Background • First in industry
– ISO 9001-2000 Certified – National Bank Certification
• Standards Commitment – Supporter of Original UDMSA – Suitability Check list for clients
• Value - added Service – Education Programs – Career Training – Financial Management Tools
US Debt Resolve Company Stats General Comparison, debt statistics 2007-2009
Average Consumer Debt Load $31,411
Average Credit Card Account Balance $5,646
Average Amount of Accounts 6.1
Average Length in Program 37
Statistics Provided: •US Debt Resolve Average Data of All Clients Enrolled from 2007-2009
The Basics: Program Calculations Basic Program Calculation:
Service Fee = Debt (X) Service Fee %
Savings = Debt (X) Est. Savings %
Total Cost of Program = Savings (+) Service Fee
Monthly Payment = Monthly Payment (/) Months in Program
2007 Fee model Fee collected evenly over 18 months
2008 Fee Model First 3 payments remainder paid over duration of program
2009 Fee model First payment remainder paid over duration of program
2008 Model Specifications Formula:
# of Accounts to Settle Per Month # of Accounts aged > 210 Days / Average Length of Program
Total $ of Accounts to Settle Per Month $ of Accounts aged >210 Days / Average Length of Program
Example:
# of Accounts to Settle Per Month 18,368 >210 Days /
40 Months = 460 Accounts Per Month
Total $ of Accounts to Settle Per Month $94,586,0373 >210 Days /
40 Months = 2.36 Million
KPI Tracking – Key performance indicators - Quarterly reviews are done by Senior Management
2008 Balances Settled
70% 62%
91% 92%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Quarter
Per
cent
age
Balances Settled %
Adjustments to forecasting are reviewed weekly as well as monthly – daily run rates are reviewed by line managers
2008 Balances Settled
46%
53%
107%
67%
44%
65%
85%
87%
97%
113%
68%
99%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
Sept ember
Oct ober
November
December
P e r c e nt a ge
Balances Set t led %
KPI Tracking includes accounts as well as balances
2008 Accounts Settled
86%
74%
82% 82%
68% 70% 72% 74% 76% 78% 80% 82% 84% 86% 88%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Quarter
Per
cent
age
Accounts Settled %
Comprehensive data indicates 81% performance for both accounts and balances
2008 Accounts Settled
71% 71%
111%
87%
58%
73%
59%
76%
111%
97%
53%
102%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Janu
ary Feb
ruary
March
April
May
June
July
Augus
t Sep
tembe
r Octo
ber
Novembe
r Dece
mber
Months
Perc
enta
ge
Accounts Settled %
A significant KPI measurement is performance compared to original balance
59%
49% 42% 45%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Quarter
2008 Original Balance
Avg % of Original
Trends on balance performance reflect market conditions, client contributions and macro economic factors
2008 Original Balance
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Janu
ary Feb
ruary
March
April
May
June
July
Augus
t Sep
tembe
r Octo
ber
Novembe
r Dece
mber
Months
Perc
enta
ge
Avg % of Original
Comprehensive data indicates 49% performance for original balances and 44% for current balances settled
50% 53%
35% 38%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Quarters
2008 Current Balance
Avg % of Current
KPI monthly Current Balance breakout
2008 Current Balance
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Janu
ary Feb
ruary
March
April
May
June
July
Augus
t Sep
tembe
r Octo
ber
Novembe
r Dece
mber
Months
Perc
enta
ge
Avg % of Current
2009 Model Specifications Formula:
# of Accounts to Settle Per Month # of Accounts aged > 120 Days / Average Length of Program
Total $ of Accounts to Settle Per Month $ of Accounts aged >120 Days / Average Length of Program
Example:
# of Accounts to Settle Per Month 20,572>120 Days /
36 Months = 571 Accounts Per Month
Total $ of Accounts to Settle Per Month $ 106,051,361 >120 Days /
36 Months = 2.945 Million
Improvement in performance is a direct result of implementation of a new service fee model, operational enhancement and reporting, and improved debt owner relationships
2009 Balances Settled
107%
144% 136%
150%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Quarter
Perc
enta
ge
Balances Settled %
KPI – 2009 monthly breakout
2009 Balances Settled
101%
114%
105%
141%
120%
173%
106%
133%
131%
182%
137%
132%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 180% 200%
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
Sept ember
Oct ober
November
December
P e r c e nt a ge
Balances Set t led %
Improvement of accounts settled is attributable to both company performance and increased loss rates of major lending institutions
2009 Accounts Settled
100%
126% 120%
91%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Quarter
Per
cent
age
Accounts Settled %
Comprehensive data indicates 107% performance for accounts and 135% for balances settled
2009 Accounts Settled
97% 97%
106%
130%
117%
129%
89%
161%
142%
166%
76%
67%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
Janu
ary Feb
ruary
March
April
May
June
July
Augus
t Sep
tembe
r Octo
ber
Novembe
r Dece
mber
Months
Perc
enta
ge
Accounts Settled %
An increase to settlement percentages is a result of significant increase in debt owner litigation
48% 47%
61% 54%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Quarters
2009 Original Balance
Avg % of Original
KPI - 2009 monthly breakout
2009 Original Balance
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Janu
ary Feb
ruary
March
April
May
June
July
Augus
t Sep
tembe
r Octo
ber
Novembe
r Dece
mber
Months
Perc
enta
ge
Avg % of Original
Measurement against current balance allows USDR to evaluate negotiator performance, creditor agreements and debt owner acceptance
40% 40%
51% 45%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Quarters
2009 Current Balance
Avg % of Current
Comprehensive data indicates 52% performance for original balances and 44% for current balances settled
2009 Current Balance
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Janu
ary Feb
ruary
March
April
May
June
July
Augus
t Sep
tembe
r Octo
ber
Novembe
r Dece
mber
Months
Perc
enta
ge
Avg % of Current
Trends indicate a 9% average attrition rate
Attrition
0
5
10
15
20
1
Year
Per
cent 2007
2008 2009
Clients with a smaller debt load – debt comprised of many accounts and have low balances - results in higher accretion
2007 Accretion Breakout
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2007
Perc
ent
2007 Under 20K 2007 Over 20K
Reduction in accretion is reflected in increased average balance
2008 Accretion Breakout
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2008
Perc
ent
2008 Accretion Under 2008 2008 Accretion over 20K
Time Frame of settlement decreases the accretion of a debt
2009 Accretion Breakout
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2009
Perc
ent
2009 Accretion under 20K 2009 Over 20K
A fee model designed to address accretion, the total cost of the program, and increased litigation, means designing a program that remits settlements to the debt owner in the shortest time frame possible
3 Year Accretion By Year
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Year
Per
cent 2007
2008 2009
Overview of US Debt Resolve Graduates
Program Length
Average 34 Months
Minimum 12 Months
Maximum 60 Months
Service Fees
Average (%) 11.95%
Average Fee($) $3,615
11.27%Average
43.48%Average Current Balance
51.8%Average Original Balance
Settlement Percentage
$325,000Maximum Debt
$3,500Minimum Debt
$29,739Average Debt
Debt Loads
Accretion