Upload
dominick-henman
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Our primary budget objective for the year is to resolve the dependency on reserves
Our carry forward (level services) budget will require double the funding increase over year’s budget request if we are to address the reserve issue
Without achieving carry forward (level services) funding from the town we would either have to ◦ continue to use reserves to maintain revenues needed to
carry forward, or◦ make reductions to the budget to close the gap ($700K)
Carry forward (level services) is not optimal. It merely keeps us where we are today.
Carry forward (level services) is not optimal it merely keeps us where we are today
An incremental reinstatement budget of $250-$550 would give us greater flexibility to address enrollment and program needs
There are three additional spending options to consider that would help us to improve the PK-12 program and address issues that are important to the community
FY16 Budget Scenarios
Adl. CostTotal Cost
Stabilize & Position for Continual Improvement
Additional Options
1.95 Mil
Reinstate FY15 Cuts3.0 FTE - Target/Support Class Size$20,000 Small Cap - Tech Earmark
1.65 MilCarry Forward
Eliminate Dependency on Reserves2.0 FTE Target/Support Class Size $35,000 Maintenance$60,000 Small Capital InvestmentsCarry Forward
Annual Growth w/out Reservere Revenue
1.4 MilLevel Services
-700,000Staff & Program ReductionsReduction by attrition up to 4 FTE
Address MS EnrollmentReduce Class Size (18)
K-8Aggressive Investment in Overall Multi-
Year District Growth (DIP)
$975,000.00 $300,000.00 $925,000.00$2,925,000.00 $2,250,000.00 $2,875,000.00
Address physical space constraints4-6 FTE / 2-Person Teams
3 FTEPossibility of Modulars at MMESor Space Reconfiguration
8 FTE - Clsrm/Support/Specialists2 Admin Support FTE$175 Small Cap Investment
The FY16 Budget request will be the first of several budgetary needs that will go before the public. As we embark on our Elementary Facilities Project voters are like to see debt exclusion votes for feasibility study and then project in the spring of 17/18 and/or 18/20 (depending on MSBA approval process).
Town Funding Landscape◦ Tax receipts form the basis of their revenue◦ Tax collection is limited by proposition 2.5◦ Use of their reserves for a one time infusion does not resolve our
revenue problem◦ Any spending that requires more than 2.5% tax increase requires voter
approval◦ Current carry forward (level services) request would require towns to
seek an OR