21
ĖđčĚč ęĕĤđĚ ĦĤĥėĐ ĦĕĎđĎďĠĐ ĦđĜĥďēĐ ĝĕđĠ ĘĞĕ :ĦėĤđĞ

אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal
Page 2: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

Teacher Education in the Maze of Pedagogical

Innovation

Yael Poyas, Editor

978-965-530-122-9

2016

03-6041096

Page 3: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal
Page 4: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal
Page 5: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

7

25

45

75

105

136

157

176

196

227

245

263

Page 6: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

286

291

300

Page 7: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

7 |

2009

Page 8: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

| 8

2003

2012

2000

Page 9: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

9 |

Page 10: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

| 10

2015 2013

Page 11: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

11 |

2013

Page 12: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

| 12

2013

2006

2005

2008

2015

Page 13: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

13 |

2010

Page 14: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

| 14

2000

2013 2000 2003

2012 ,2010

Page 15: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

15 |

2003

2010

2013 2010

(

Page 16: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

| 16

110

Page 17: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

17 |

Page 18: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

| 18

2012

61-43 , ,

21 2010

http://www. 2010

vanleer.org.il/sites/files/atttachment_field/1-%D7%92.pdf

2013

92-60

2010

56-47 2010

2000

2008

90-56

Page 19: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

19 |

2000

21 2010

http://www.matar.ac.il/eureka/ 30 ,

newspaper30/docs/05.pdf

2003

2015

2000

21 2013

296-269

49-46 ,(3 , 2010

2012

Aubusson, P., & Schuck, S. (2013). Teacher education futures: Today's

trends, tomorrow's expectations. Teacher Development, 17(3), 322-333.

Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory,

research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.

Burn, K., & Mutton, T. (2013). Review of ‘research-informed clinical

practice' in initial teacher education. Retrieved from https://www.bera.

ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERA-Paper-4-Research-informed-

clinical-practice.pdf

Clapham, M. M. (2003). The development of innovative ideas through

creativity training. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook

on innovation (366-376). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

Conroy, J., Hulme, M., & Menter, I. (2013). Developing a ‘clinical'

model for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 39(5),

557-573.

Forest, J., & Faucheux, M. (2009, November). Creative rationality and

design education: Towards a pedagogy of adventure. Paper presented at

the 26th ICSID World Design Congress, Singapore.

Gibson, R. (2010). The ‘art' of creative teaching: Implications for higher

education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 607-613.

Page 20: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

| 20

Goldsmith, R. E., & Foxall, G. R. (2003). The measurement of

innovativeness. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on

innovation (321-330). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

Grossman, P. (2010). Learning to practice: The design of clinical experience

in teacher preparation. A policy paper. Washington, DC: American

Association of Colleges for Teacher Education [AACTE] and National

Education Association [NEA].

Gumport, P. J. (2000). Academic restructuring: Organizational change and

institutional imperatives. Higher Education, 39(1), 67-91.

Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic

and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

of Change Management, 9(3), 323-338.

Kerr, C. (1987). A critical age in the university world: Accumulated

heritage versus modern imperatives. European Journal of Education,

22(2), 183-193.

Kettunen, J. (2011). Innovation pedagogy for universities of applied

sciences. Creative Education, 2(1), 56-62.

Kezar, A. (2011). What is the best way to achieve broader reach of improved

practices in higher education? Innovative Higher Education, 36(4),

235-247.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE

Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of

technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators

(3-29). Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge.

Kostoff, R. N. (2003). Simulating innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.),

The international handbook on innovation (388-400). Oxford, UK:

Pergamon Press.

Malian, I. M., & Nevin, A. I. (2005). A framework for understanding

assessment of innovation in teacher education. Teacher Education

Quarterly, 32(3), 7-17.

Mclean Davies, L., Anderson, M., Deans, J., Dinham, S., Griffin, P.,

Kameniar, B., Page, J., Reid, C., Rickards, F., Tayler, C., & Tyler, D.

(2013). Masterly preparation: Embedding clinical practice in a graduate

pre-service teacher education programme. Journal of Education for

Teaching, 39(1), 93-106.

McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2008). The three P's of pedagogy for

the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity.

International Journal for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,

20(1), 10-27.

Page 21: אתר הבית של מכון מופ"ת · Hartley, M. (2009). Leading grassroots change in the academy: Strategic and ideological adaptation in the civic engagement movement. Journal

21 |

Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The song remains the

same: Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends,

53(5), 48-53.

Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003) .Innovation in the public sector. London:

UK Cabinet Office, Prime Minister's Strategy Unit.

Spring, J. (2008). Research on globalization and education. Review of

Educational Research, 78(2), 330-363.

U.S. Department of Education (2011). Our future, our teachers: The Obama

administration's plan for teacher education reform and improvement.

Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/our-future-our-

teachers.pdf

Vaira, M. (2004). Globalization and higher education organizational

change: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 48(4), 483-510.

Watson, D. M. (2001). Pedagogy before technology: Rethinking the

relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and Information

Technologies, 6(4), 251-266.

Westera, W. (2004). On strategies of educational innovation: Between

substitution and transformation. Higher Education, 47(4), 501-517.

White, S. C., & Glickman, T. S. (2007). Innovation in higher education:

Implications for the future. New Directions for Higher Education, 137,

97-105.

Zgaga, P. (2013). The future of European teacher education in the heavy

seas of higher education. Teacher Development, 17(3), 347-361.