Upload
charlotte-jordan
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
How is the program being implemented at the secondary level?
Is the program effective in meeting the anticipated expectations of program management?
Is the program equally effective for any specific subgroups at the secondary level (ex/ special education students, economically disadvantaged)?
Evaluation Questions
Inputs Outputs Outcomes
Resources for the evaluation:
-access to staff and students.
-access to AR data.
-time
Participation
Client/Central Office
Administrators
English teachers
Librarians
Students
ActivitiesData Collection
-Initial Client Meeting (early Jan.)-Staff Interviews(Mid-Jan. – Mid. Feb.)-AR Data collection and disaggregation(Mid-Jan. – Mid. Feb.)-Client Interval Report and Input(Late Feb.)-Student Surveys(Late Feb. – March)Report out final results to client (Early April)
Deliverables(Short term)
Clearer understanding of current practices
Strengths of the program
Deficiencies of the program
Recommendations
(Long term)
Improve the overall reading program
Improve the overall reading success in the secondary setting.
Assumption: Participants will be open and honest as well as assuming that the AR program is the intended reading program.
External Factors: Preconceived knowledge, researcher bias, stakeholder bias, participant involvement, and availability of data.