Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
- How common?- How to treat it?
Jon “JP” Warner, MDChief, MGH Shoulder ServiceChair, Quality and Safety MGOAProfessor of OrthopedicsHarvard Medical School
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Disclosures Wright Medical: Royalty on Rotator cuff implant; Consultant
IMASCAP: Stock
Smith and Nephew: Fellowship Funding
Arthrex: Fellowship funding
Breg: Fellowship Funding
San Diego Shoulder Institute: BOD
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
22 yo woman with seizure disorder (no sz in > 1yr)Multiple dislocations: “Too many to count”Worried to put arm away from bodyHad prior failed arthroscopic stabilization
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Remplissage
BankartRepair
MRI? (This patient had treatment already….do you think it was successful?
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
CT SCAN…WITH/WITHOUT DYE?
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
CT Scan- Which is best view?
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
CT-Scan with3D reconstruction?
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Shoulder Instability Bone Loss
1,720,000 results (0.49 seconds)
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Series1
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
511 publications
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Shoulder stabilization in 1994most common stabilization procedures performed in 880 German clinics in 1994
◦ open Bankart 30%
◦ Eden-Hybbinette 28.6%
◦ Weber (Osteotomy) 27.1%
◦ Lange 15.5%
◦ Putti-Platt 13.6%
◦ arthroscopic stabilization 7.5%.
(Jerosch et al. Unfallchirurg. 1994)
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Shoulder stabilization in 2008
(Owens et al. AJSM 2011)
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
1999-2006: 551 Cases
9%
All other instability Rx
2007-2011
30%
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Conelly JF: Humeral Head Defects associated with Shoulder dislocation- Their Diagnostic & Surgical SignificanceICL, 1972. Recurrence with Infraspinatus Transfer = 1/15 (7%)
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
…around 20% (Provencher et al, JAAOS 2009
“”INSIGNIFICANT”“SIGNIFICANT”
“VERY SIGNIFICANT”
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
ALPSA Lesion has recurrence rate of 19% vs 5% in Bankart repair…- Ozbaydar, Arthroscopy 2008
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Beren C. et al: Treatment of chronic glenoid defects in the setting of recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review. JSES, 2010
Only 6 articles met inclusion criteria (quantitated bone loss & reported results )
“Chronic glenoid deficiency in the setting of recurrent anterior instability is an extremely challenging problem. There remains a lack of strong evidence guiding the surgeon in the decision-making process.”
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATIONCourtesy G. Wolf
Remplissage: “filling”Trans-tendinous transfer of infraspinatus
Into HS lesion = Arthroscopic “Conelly procedure”
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
- Courtesy G. Wolf
Wolf, JSES 2013:
2002-2010
59/270 (22%) = glenoid bone loss
4.4% recurrent instability
Rowe score = 95
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
JBJS-A, 2012 47/459 (10%) underwent Bankart + Remplissage
For Hill-Sachs lesion without glenoid bone loss.
90% return to sport; 9 deg avg loss E.R.
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
1985 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02
20
113 117120
99
58 60
100 103
122
91
36
10796
04 0503
105 107
125
01
1985-2005: 1895 procedures
Gillis Walch
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Journées Lyonnaises de l’épaule LYON - 1993
n = 160 cases - FU 4 years
Subjective results: 97% satisfied or very satisfied
Sports: 87% able to resume the same sport
Recurrence: 1.2%
“I once had an axillaryNerve problem…thePatient was upset”- G. Walch
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
- Courtesy G. Walch
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4
Open Latarjet
Arthroscopic Bankart
N=26N=28
N=34 N=34
Total Traumatic Anterior Stabilizations = 122
2007 2008 2009 2010
27%
25%50% 62%
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Butt C & Charalambous CP: Complications associated with open coracoid transfer
procedures for shoulder instability. JSES 2012
30 Studies reviewed including 1658 Coracoid Process transfers
Reoperation rate = 5%
Recurrent instability = 6%
Hardware complications = 6.5%
Nonunion rate of coracoid = 10%
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Recurrent Instability = 8%
Neurologic Injury = 10%
Superficial Infection = 6%
Bone loss + prolonged
retraction
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Neuromonitoring the Latarjet Procedure:
A Multicent Study
Annual ASES Meeting, Neer Award, 2014
Ruth Delaney M.D.Michael Freehill, M.D.D.R. Janfaza, M.D.K.V. Vlassakov, M.D.Laurence Higgins, M.D.Jon JP Warner, M.D.
76% HAD AN INTRAOPERATIVE NERVE ALERT
21% HAD A NERVE DEFICIT POSTOP.
All findings resolved within 28-165 days
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Lafosse L & Boyle S: Arthroscopic
Latarjet Procedure. JSES, 2010
Early & Late Complications:
Graft Fx/non-union = 5 (5%)
“The all-arthroscopic Latarjet is a reliable but difficult technique, with a steep learning curve “
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Warner JJP et al: Anatomical glenoid reconstruction for recurrent
anterior glenohumeral instability with glenoid deficiency using an
autogenous tricortical iliac crest bone graft. AJSM, 2005
11/264 Traumatic Instability Repairs over 3 years
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
PREOP. EVAL F/U POSTOP. EVAL.
ASES UCLA ROWE ASES UCLA ROWE
40 17 20 60 months 100 35 100
40 12 20 38 months 83 31 90
73 18 15 36 months 100 35 95
82 25 45 32 months 87 34 85
47 12 15 30 months 95 32 90
83 24 45 30 months 100 35 100
60 60 25 29 months 95 33 100
77 19 30 29 months 100 35 100
65 15 25 24 months 75 22 75
80 24 40 24 months 100 35 95
67 21 30 31 months 97 35 95
4 Pro Hockey Players
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
5 years postop.
5 years postop
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
JSES, 2014
2006-2011: 11 patients treated with J-Graft for glenoid bone loss < 5%
Rowe score = 85%
Glenoid surface area increased from 96% to 103%
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Rim reconstruction with autogenous iliac crest for anterior
glenoid deficiency: forty-three instability cases followed for
5-19 years. Steffen & Hertel, R, JSES 2012
- 48 PATIENTS- Avg F/U = 9.2 years- 8/43 (19%) had residual pain- 4/43 (9%) recurrent instability
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
Bhatia et al: Comparison of glenohumeral contact pressures and contact areas after glenoidreconstruction with latarjet or distal tibial osteochondral allografts. AJSM 2013
Distal Tibial Osteochondral Allograft
improved joint Congruity…
NORMAL
Tibial allograft
EVALUATION & TREATMENT OF THE INJURED ATHLETEADVANCED TOPICS IN SURGERY AND REHABILITATION
“I am so clever that sometimes I don’t
Understand a single word of what I am saying”
- Oscar Wilde