Upload
cleopatra-moody
View
235
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Fiedlers contingency model of leadership Hersey and Blanchards situational leaderships
theory House path – goal theory of leadership Yulk’s multiple linkage of leader’s effectiveness Vroom – yetton (p.145) theory
2
Measure & intepretation of LPC LPC- least preferred coworkers Motive of LPC – if high, that means you have a
close interpersonal relationship with other people
i. considerate
ii. supportive
iii. close
3
Low LPC
– is to achieve task objective
- concerned about doing a good job
- task oriented behavior
4
Establishing good relation only if group performing well or no serious task problem
Low LPC leaders (1)Value task success
High LPC leaders (2)Value interpersonal success
5
In Fiedler’s Model
The relationship between leader LPC score and leader effectiveness depends on a complex situational variable
i - situational favorability
ii - situational control - measured by:
a) leader-member relation* b) task structure
c) position power6
Situation control is greatest when leader-member relation is good. Task is highly structured and the leader has substantial position power.
* MOST IMPORTANT
7
High and low LPC leaders are more effective in some situation
Causal relationships in fiedler’s theory
8
Causal variableCausal variable
leader’s LPC scoreleader’s LPC score
End result variableEnd result variable
group performancegroup performance
Situational mederator variablesSituational mederator variables
• Leader member relationLeader member relation• Leader position power Leader position power
• Task structureTask structureCRITISMS P.139CRITISMS P.139
Causal variableCausal variable
leader’s LPC scoreleader’s LPC score
End result variableEnd result variable
group performancegroup performance
Situational mederator variablesSituational mederator variables
• Leader member relationLeader member relation• Leader position power Leader position power
• Task structureTask structure
A) TWO CATEGORIES OF LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORi. Task behavior (initiating structure Ohio)
ii. Relationship behavior (consideration)
B) SITUATIONAL MODERATOR VARIABLEi. maturity
9
Defining of maturity: Capacity to set high but attainable goals (ACH. Motivation) willingness to take responsibility, education, experience.
EMPLOYEE CAN BE
Matured or Unmatured
* It depends on the task
10
JOB MATURITY PSYCOLOGICAL MATURITY
TASK MATURITY
TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE
FEELING OF SELF CONFIDENCE
SELF RESPECT
11
MATURITY
HIGH MATURITY
HIGH DEGREE OF SELF HIGH ABILITY
CONFIDENCE TO DO THE JOB
LOW MATURITY
LACKS ABILITY AND CONFIDENCE
12
HOW LONG IT TAKES TO MATURE A SUBORDINATE DEPENDS ON THE COMPLEXITY OF THE TASK AND THE
CHARACTERISTIC OF THE SUBORDINATE
13
Casual variablesCasual variables
- Task behavior- Task behavior- Relationship behavior- Relationship behavior
- Developmental intervention- Developmental intervention
End results variableEnd results variable
- Leader effectiveness- Leader effectiveness
Situational moderator variablesSituational moderator variables
• Subordinate maturitySubordinate maturity
1. DIRECTING Give specific instruction and supervise
staff closely . appopriate for first year teacher
2. COACHING Explain decision and solicit suggestion
from followers but continue to direct task
14
Coaching Works well for 2nd OR 3rd Year teacher
They are gaining confidence and competence
3. SUPPORTING Make decision together with staff
members and support their efforts. Appopriat for creative teachers. Support those with excellent ideas
15
4. DELEGATING Turn over decision and responsibility
for implementing them to staff members
Appropriate for teachers who go above and beyond their instruction
16
A(1,9) B(9,9) SUPPORTING COACHING
Q3 Q2 Q4 Q1 DELEgATING DIRECTING
C(1,1) D(9,1)
VERY HIGH HIGH LOW VERY LOW
17
ORIENTASI PEKERJA
A=PARTICIPATING (LT,HR) B=SELLING (HR,HT) C=DELEGATING (LR,LT) D=TELLING (LR,HT)
HERSEY+MOUTON STUDY
18
PARTICIPATING=HR,LT,HM
MENYOKONG SELLING=HR,HT,LM M=KEMATANGAN
COACHING R=RELATIONSHIP TELLING=LR,HT,LM T= TUGAS
DIRECTING DELEGATING=LT,LR,HM
DELEGASI
19
To explain how the behavior of a leader influence the motivation and satisfaction of subordinates
20
1. House’s Path-Goal Theory of Leadership
Path-goal theory of leadership assumes that a leader’s key function is to adjust his or her behaviors to complement situational contingency.
Directive leadership spells out the what and how of subordinates’ tasks.
Supportive leadership focuses on subordinate needs, well-being, and promotion of a friendly work climate.
21
Leadership Factors Contingency Factors
Subordinate Outcomes
Leadership Behaviors: Directive SupportiveAchievement orientedParticipate
Subordinate Attributes: AuthoritarianismInternal-external orientation Ability
Work-Setting Attributes:TaskFormal authority systemPrimary work group
Job Satisfaction: Job leads to valued rewards
Acceptance of Leader:Leader leads to valued rewards
Motivational Behavior:Expectancy that effort leads to performanceInstrumentality that such performance is the path to valued rewards
22
Summary of major path-goal relationships in House’s leadership
approach
Achievement oriented leadership emphasize setting challenging goals, stressing excellence in performance, and showing confidence in people’s ability to achieve high standards of performance.
Participative leadership focuses on consulting with subordinates and seeking and taking their suggestions into account before making decisions.
23
MOTIVATION FUNCTION OF A LEADER CONSIST OF:
24
Increasing personal payoffs of subordinates for work goal attainment
Opportunities for personal satisfaction Reducing roadblocks and pitfall
Provide subordinate with
CoachingGuidance Perfomance incentives
25
CAUSAL INTERVENING END-RESULT VARIABLE VARIABLES VARIABLES
LEADER SUBORDINATE SUBORDINATE’S
BEHAVIOR EXPECTATION EFFORTS AND
& VALUES SATISFACTION
26
SITUATIONAL MODERATOR VARIABLESCharacteristics of Task and Environment
Characteristics of Subordinates
Pembolehbah intervening
**Ciri kumpulan dan individu
**Kesan tingkahlaku pemimpin dalam jangkamasa pendek keatas prestasi akan di ganggu oleh pembolehubah intervening ini
27
1. Usaha subordinat = sejauh mana betul-betul ia berusaha untuk mencapai prestasi tinggi dan penuh bertanggugjawab/komited?
2. Kejelasan tugas subordinat: sejauh mana subordinat faham tugasnya, t/jawabnya dan apa yang diharapkan darinya
28
3 Kemahiran subordinat untuk laksana tugas Pengalamannya Latihan Kemahiran
4. Sumber dan perkhidmatan sokongan Sejauh mana subordinat berkemampuan
mendapatkan alat, kelengkapan dan segala yang diperlukan untuk buat tugas dengan baik
29
5. Oraganisasi tugas dan peranan sejauh mana unit kerja itu dekendalikan
dengan tersusun untuk mempastikan stafnya layak, tiada pertindanan tugas dan tidak membuang masa
6. ‘Kohesif’kumpulan dan kerja berpasukan sejauh mana subordinat mampu
bekerjasama dengan rakan sekerja, berkongsi idea, mesra, bantu membantu, bertimbang rasa, dan berjaya
30
7. Hubungan pemimpin – pengikut Sejauhmana subordinat menyenangi
tingkah laku pemimpinnya, mesra, seronok bekerja dengannya dan puas hati
PENJELASAN1. Keupayaan sebenar
2. Peranan yng jelas
3. Usaha / kemampuan
31
1. Walaupun subordinat memang bermotivasi tinggi, berkemahiran, faham kehendak tugas, tetapi prestasi sebenar masih kurang daripada potensi maksima sekiranya peralatan,dan kelengakapan tidak ada atau tak cukup
2. Prestasi berkumpulan kakitangan juga bergantung kepada faktor lain yang mempengaruhi prestasi individu. Juga, bergantung kepada organisasi peranan tugas dan kohensif kumpulan
32
3. Jika penyempurnaan projek seperti yang diharapkan sesuai dengan kemahiran subordinat, maka prestasi kumpulan akan meningkat.
4. Kohesif kumpulan dan teamwork melibatkan hubungan interpersonal antara subordinat, bila terjadi hubungan baik barulah ada peningkatan prestasi kumpulan.
33
5. Sekiranya hubungan pemimpin dan pengikut tidak mesra, subrdinat akan
Membataskan komunikasi keatas dengan merahsiakan maklumat dan menyorok kesilapan dan kelemahan
Tercicir daripada kerja – ponteng Sabotaj – tak boleh buat kerja –
komplen lebih Kurangkan usaha – tidak buat kerja
dengan baik / lambat
34
Pembolehubah situasi akan mempengaruhi
secara langsung pembolehubah intervening
Contoh – contoh situasi mempengaruhi usaha subordinat ialah
1. Subordinat mungkin menjadi bermotivasi dalaman tinggi sekiranya mereka mempunyai etika kerja yang kuat, professional dan mempunyai nilai kerja seperti dalam syarikat Jepun.
35
2. Penentu situasi utama berkaitan kejelasan peranan dalam model multiple linkage adalah struktur tugas dan role formalization (rules and regulation)
3. Kemahiran melaksanakan tugas berbeza bagi setiap kakitangan. Kemahiran masakini akan mempengaruhi prestasi kumpulan. Tahap kemahiran subordinat jua tertakluk kpd proses perlantikan dan ini juga merupakan satu pemboleh ubah situasi subordinat.
4. Yang terakhir ialah tahap kemahiran subordinat melalui latihan yang diterima sebelum terlibat melaksanakan tugas bersama pemimpin.
36
37
38
Leader CharacteristicsNeed Achievement
Need PowerSelf Confidence
Emotional MaturityTechnical skills
Conceptual SkillsInterpersonal Skills
Situational VariablesPosition Power
Nature of subordinatesTask/Technology
Organization StructureNature of EnvironmentExternal DependenciesSocial Political Forces
Organizational and Culture
Managerial Behavior
Planning Recognizing
Prob. Solving Rewarding
Clarifying Supporting Monitoring Mentoring
Informing Networking
Motivating Consulting
Conflict Mgt. Representing
Intervening VariablesFollower Effort
Ability & Role ClarityOrganization of Work Cooperation
Resource Adequacy
External Coordination
End-result VariablesUnit Performance
Profitability Survival & GrowthGoal Attainment
Member Satisfaction
Personal Power