davidsnet.wsdavidsnet.ws/biblical/page11/files/NT637GeneralEpistles… · Web viewThis paper may be submitted electronically (in .doc, .docx, .wpf, or .pdf format – check with

NT 637 General Epistles Houston Graduate School of Theology

Spring Term 2011The mission of Houston Graduate School of Theology is empowering spiritual leadership through the intellectual, spiritual, and vocational development of men and women in order to advance the gospel of Jesus Christ throughout the world.

Instructor: Peter H. Davids, Ph.D.Email: [email protected]: 281-968-2710 (cell: 506-465-9126)

Course time: Mondays, 7:45 – 10:15 PMCourse credit: 3 hours

Course description: Studies in the Epistles of James, Peter, John and Jude with attention to exegetical methods, historical and literary contexts, interpretation and application, and the significance of these Epistles.

Course objectives:At the conclusion of this course students will be able to:

Summarize the theology of each of the non-Johannine General Epistles Describe the role and function of the non-Johannine General Epistles in the

canon Identify and appraise the issues involved in key crux interpreta within the non-

Johannine General Epistles Identify background documents used by the non-Johannine General Epistles and

explain their meaning for the theological method of the author Apply the teaching of key passages in the non-Johannine General Epistles to

typical pastoral situations in the church.

Textbooks:Required:

Peter H. Davids. James. NIBC; Baker Academic. ISBN: 978-0-8010-4601-8.Peter H. Davids. The First Epistle of Peter. NICNT; William B. Eerdmans, 1990. ISBN: 978-0-8028-2516-8.Peter H. Davids. The Letters of 2 Peter and Jude. Pillar; William B. Eerdmans, 2006. ISBN: 978-0-8028-3726-4

Recommended:Ralph P. Martin and Peter H. Davids, eds. Dictionary of the Latter New Testament and Its Developments. InterVarsity Press, 1997. ISBN: 978-0-8308-1779-4.

Course schedule:

Date Topic AssignmentJan Introduction + James 1 Read syllabus and be ready to ask questions; read Davids,

Davids - NT 637 General Epistles Syllabus 1

mailto:[email protected]

24 James, pp 1 – 23. Read Jas 1.Jan 31

James 2 – Is there a James – Paul problem?

Read Jas 2. Scan relevant commentary section in textbook and be ready to discuss the topic**Feb 2 is last day to withdraw with partial refund**

Feb 7 James 3 – 4 – Wisdom and the world

Read Jas 3 – 4. Scan relevant commentary section in textbook and be ready to discuss the topic

Feb 14

James 5 – Healing now and judgment later

Read Jas 5. Scan relevant commentary section in textbook and be ready to discuss the topic

Feb 21

1 Peter 1 – Elect foreigners

Read Davids, First Peter, pp 3 – 44; be ready to discuss suffering in the NT. Read 1 Pet 1.

Feb 28

1 Peter 2 – People of God

Read 1 Pet 2. Scan relevant commentary section in textbook and be ready to discuss the topic

Mar 7

1 Peter 3 – Dealing with political reality


Mar 14

Spring Break – no class Since there is no class, relax

Mar 21

1 Peter 4 – Suffering as a believer


Mar 28

1 Peter 5 – What of the Church?


Apr 4

Jude – Practical apostasy

Read Davids, 2 Peter and Jude, 1 – 32. Read Jude. Scan relevant commentary section in textbook and be ready to discuss whether apostasy can be practical or only doctrinal.

Apr 11

Jude – the Others Be ready to discuss the topic: How does Jude deal with “the Others.”

Apr 18

2 Peter 1 – What has Jesus done for us?

Read Davids, 2 Peter and Jude, 121 – 158. Scan relevant commentary section in textbook and be ready to discuss the topic. Read 2 Pet 1. ** Paper due**** Apr 20 is last day to withdraw with “WP” or “WF”**

Apr 25

2 Peter 2 – Dealing with dissent and editing Jude


May 2

2 Peter 3 - Eschatology Read 2 Pet 3. Scan relevant commentary section in textbook and be ready to discuss the topic

May 9

Final exam Review your reading and notes

The course schedule is the planned schedule as of the creation of this syllabus. The instructor reserves the right to change the schedule as future developments necessitate.

Course assignments:This course is built around three pillars: (1) the student discussion and the instructor’s lectures in the classroom, (2) student reading and reflection, and (3) student research. All are important.

The instructor will assess at each class meeting whether the student is present, prepared, and participating. Reading the required material is the first step towards preparation, the second being reflecting on the issue for the day and the third being further research, such as reading relevant articles in the Dictionary of the Latter New Testament. Class discussion will not only be about

Davids – NT 637 General Epistles Syllabus2

theology, but about the application of this theology to practical situations in the church. This will be 30% of the final mark.

The student will do the required reading and think through the lecture material, being prepared to discuss the issues raised in the class lecture topics and the first four course objectives on a final exam that will be largely essay. This will be 35% of the final mark.

The student will pick one critical issue or theology theme that occurs in one or more of these letters and discuss it in a 3000 to 3500 word formal research paper, the last page of which will discuss the application of the theology discussed to an issue in the church. This will be 35% of the final mark. This paper is due April 18, although earlier submission is encouraged. This paper may be submitted electronically (in .doc, .docx, .wpf, or .pdf format – check with the instructor first before using any other format).

Attendance policy:Because of the nature of the course, participation in class discussion in extremely important. If a student is absent from the class for any reason other than a death in the immediate family or a documented serious medical condition (i.e. not, “I had a headache,” but “Here is a copy of an emergency room receipt”) or significant accident on the way to class (document by an insurance or police report), they will lose the mark for that day of class unless it is made up by writing a 1500 word formal essay on the topic of the day, an essay that shows that one is interacting with both the instructor’s view and that of another major mainline critical scholar.

Late submission policy:The instructor will do his best to get assignments back to students in a timely manner. Student are to do their best to submit assignments on time. Late assignments will be penalized by 2% of the mark per day for up to two weeks, after which it will no longer be accepted. Students who can document emergencies such as those noted under the heading “attendance policy” will be allowed to turn in their work late without penalty by an appropriate amount of time in relation to the reason for lateness. In any case, anything not submitted by the last day of class will be governed by the “HGST policy on incompletes” (see below).

HGST Statement on Plagiarism:Plagiarism is presenting the work of another person as one‘s own without giving proper credit for the use of the information. Students must not quote or paraphrase books, articles, essays, or Internet sites without giving proper credit to the author(s). Students should guard against plagiarism by crediting the original author through use of proper citations. Internet plagiarism is a particularly easy and tempting form of intellectual theft. Cutting and pasting sentences and paragraphs from the Internet without citations is plagiarism. Failure to cite Internet sources is plagiarism. Any student found guilty of plagiarism is subject to a range of consequences as outlined below:


1. If a faculty member suspects plagiarism, the instructor will investigate. If suspicions are confirmed, the faculty member will present the evidence to the appropriate Associate Dean as a record of the offense. If the Associate Dean concurs with the allegations, the following procedures should be implemented as applicable:

a. The faculty member may discuss the offense with the student following consultation with the Associate Dean, but the student will meet with the Associate Dean. b. For a first offense, the faculty member, in consultation with the Associate Dean, may give opportunity for a rewrite of the assignment or may assign a grade of zero for the plagiarized assignment. c. For a particularly egregious case of plagiarism on a major assignment, the consequences could result in automatic failure of the course.

2. The student may appeal the above-mentioned decisions of the faculty member in writing to the Dean of the Faculty.

3. The second confirmed offense will result in expulsion from school. The student will be notified by a letter from the Dean of the Faculty. His or her only opportunity for appeal will be to the President in writing. The President‘s decision will be final.

HGST Policy on Incompletes:In cases of extenuating circumstances, and at the discretion of the instructor, a student may request and apply for an extension on all required assignments that are not completed by the end of the semester or term, subject to a half-letter grade reduction on the final grade. If an extension is granted, the instructor will record a grade of “I” (Incomplete) and set an extension of time, not to exceed thirty calendar days from the end of the class, within which to complete the work. Additional extensions may be granted only by the Dean of the Faculty and only after a student has petitioned the Dean in writing. If the course work is not completed within the extended time allotment, the grade of “I” will be converted to the grade earned by the student up to that point.The student is responsible to ensure that all necessary paperwork is submitted to the registrar’s office by the deadline published in the school calendar.

Information about Houston-area Libraries:Your ability to get the most out of library resources will enhance the possibility of your earning a high grade in this class. Therefore you should consider using, in addition to the HGST library, one or more of the following libraries.

Houston Public Library— Any resident of Texas can obtain a free Houston Public Library card. Library cardholders have access to all of the books in the library system as well as the use of free interlibrary loans, meaning that HPL


cardholders can borrow almost any book available. Cardholders can use the library’s website, www.houstonlibrary.org, to search the catalog and manage interlibrary loans. The website also contains links to WorldCat and other online databases that will enhance your research. The HPL location that is closest to HGST, the Collier Regional Branch (832.393.1740), is located at 6200 Pinemont, which is less than three miles from campus. A better option would be the newly expanded and renovated Central Library (832.393.1313), which is located downtown at 500 McKinney. In addition, HPL has many other locations. The HGST library can give you an application for an HPL library card, or you can print the application form from their website.

Fondren Library at Rice University— The Fondren Library (713.348.5113) is located at 6100 Main. For more information, please visit www.rice.edu/fondren. The procedure for borrowing books at the Fondren Library is, first, go to the online catalog [www.rice.edu/fondren] to search for available books; second, go to the HGST library and fill out a form, signed by HGST library personnel, to take with you to the Fondren Library for each book; third, retrieve the book(s) yourself; fourth, take the book(s) and the signed form to the circulation desk to complete checkout (return the yellow copy to the HGST library; when the book(s) are returned to the Fondren Library, they will indicate so on the pink and gold copies; return the pink copy to the HGST Library and keep the gold copy for your records).

Cardinal Beran Library at St Mary’s Seminary—the home of an extensive theological library, St Mary’s Seminary (713.686.4345) is located at 9845 Memorial Drive, only 4.6 miles from HGST. For more information, please visit http://beran.stthom.edu. The Doherty Library on the main campus of University of St Thomas is also an option.

Library of the Presbytery of the New Covenant – as an HGST student you have borrowing privileges at this library located at 1110 Lovett Blvd, Houston. To search their online catalogue, go to http://www.pbyofnewcovenant.org/cgi-bin/rqm/rqm.cgi.

Other options include Harris County Public Library (www.hcpl.net) and the libraries at the University of Houston and Houston Baptist University.

Course Bibliography:The following bibliography is a select bibliography that could easily be added to, but covers the major topics discussed in this course:

Works on more than one General Epistle (other than both 2 Peter and Jude):

Bauckham, Richard J. “James, 1 and 2 Peter, Jude.” In D. A. Carson and H. G. M. Williamson, eds., It Is Written: Scripture Citing Scripture. Essays in Honour of Barnabas Lindars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. 303-317.

Bigg, Charles. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistles of St. Peter and St. Jude .ICC; Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1901.


Bray, Gerald. James, 1-2 Peter, 1-3 John, Jude. Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture, New Testament 11; InterVarsity Press, 2000.

Bruce, F. F. Peter, Stephen, James, and John: Studies in Non-Pauline Christianity. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1979.

Calvin, John. Commentaries on the Catholic Epistles. Ed. and trans. J. Owen. Calvin’s Commentaries 22. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, (1551) 1979.

Cantinat, Jean. Les Épitres de Saint Jacques et de Saint Jude. SB; Paris: J. Gabalda et Cie, 1973.

Chaine, Joseph. Les épîtres catholiques; la seconde épître de saint Pierre, les épîtres de saint Jean, l'épître de saint Jude. Etudes bibliques; Paris, J. Gabalda 1939.

Chester, Andrew and Martin, Ralph P. The Theology of the Letters of James, Peter, and Jude. New Testament Theology; Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Davids, Peter H. “The Use of Second Temple Traditions in 1 and 2 Peter and Jude.” In Jacques Schlosser, ed., The Catholic Epistles and the Tradition. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theoligcarum Lovaniensium 176; Leuven: Peeters/University Press, 2004. 420-421.

Hillyer, Norman. 1 and 2 Peter, Jude. NIBC; Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1992.

Kelly, J. N. D. (John Norman Davidson). The Epistles of Peter and of Jude. BNTC; London: Adam and Charles Black, 1969.

Moffatt, James. The General Epistles: James, Peter and Judas. MNTC; London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1928.

Perkins, Pheme. First and Second Peter, James, and Jude. Interpretation; Louisville: John Knox Press, 1995.

Plumptre, Edward Hayes. The General Epistles of St. Peter and St. Jude. CBSC; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1892.

Reicke, Bo Ivar. The Epistles of James, Peter, and Jude. AB 37; Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1964.

Scaggs, Rebecca. The Pentecostal Commentary on 1 Peter 2 Peter Jude. Cleveland, TN: The Pilgrim Press, 2004.

Schreiner, Thomas R. 1, 2, Peter, Jude. The New American Commentary 37; Nashville: Broadman and Holman Publishers, 2003.

Schelkle, Karl Hermann. Die Petrusbriefe, der Judasbrief. HTKNT XII.2; Freiburg: Herder, 19805.

Sidebottom, E. M. James, Jude and 2 Peter. NCB; London: Thomas Nelson, 1967.

Spicq, Ceslas. Les Épitres de Saint Pierre. Sources Bibliques; Paris : J. Gabalda et Cie, 1966.


Thurén, Lauri. “The General New Testament Writings.” In Stanley E. Porter, ed. Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B.C. – A. D. 400. Leiden: Brill, 2001. 587 – 607.

Windisch, Hans. Die katholischen Briefe. Handbuch zum Neuen Testament 15; Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1930.

Witherington III, Ben. Letters and Homilies for Jewish Christians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on Hebrews, James and Jude. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2007.

JamesBauckham, Richard. James: Wisdom of James, disciple of Jesus the Sage.

New Testament Readings; London and New York, Routledge, 1999.

Blomberg, Craig L. and Kamell, Mariam J. James. Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament; Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2008.

Chilton, Bruce and Evans, Craig A., eds. James the Just and Christian Origins. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 98; Leiden, Brill, 1999.

Idem_. The Missions of James, Peter, and Paul: Tensions in Early Christianity. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 115; Leiden, Brill, 2005.

Chilton, Bruce and Neusner, Jacob, eds. The Brother of Jesus: James the Just and His Mission. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.

Davids, Peter H. The Epistle of James. NIGTC; Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1982.

Idem. “The Meaning of Apeirastos in James i.13.” NTS 24 (1978) 386392.

Idem. “The Meaning of Revisited.” In Timothy Sailors and Amy Donaldson, eds, New Testament Greek and Exegesis; Essays in Honor of Gerald Hawthorn. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2003. 225-240.

Idem. Themes in the Epistle of James that are Judaistic in Character. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester, 1974.

Deppe, Dean B. The Sayings of Jesus in the Epistle of James. Chelsea, MI: Bookcrafters, 1989.

Dibelius, Martin Der Brief des Jakobus. KEK; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1921, 196411. English translation, Martin Dibelius and Heinrich Greeven, James : A Commentary on the Epistle of James (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1976).

Frankemölle, Hubert Der Brief des Jakobus Kapitel 1/Kapitel 2-5 (Ökumenischer Taschenbuch-Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 17/1-2; Gütersloh/Würzburg: Gütersloher Verlaghaus/ Echter Verlag, 1994).

Haaker, Klaus. “Justification, salut et foi: Étude sur les rapports entre Paul, Jacques et Pierre.” Etudes Théologiques & Religieuses 73.2 (1998) 177-188.


Hartin, Patrick J. James and the Q Sayings of Jesus. JSNT Supplement 47; Sheffield, JSOT Press, 1991.

Idem. James of Jersusalem: Heir to Jesus of Nazareth. Interfaces; Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2004.

Hort, F. J. A. The Epistle of St. James. London, 1909.

Johnson, Luke Timothy. Brother of Jesus Friend of God: Studies in the Letter of James. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2004.

Idem. The Letter of James. Anchor Bible 37A; New York, Doubleday, 1995.

Kirk, J. A. “The Meaning of Wisdom in James.” NTS 16 (1969) 24–38.

Kloppenborg. John S. “Reception and Emulation of the Jesus Tradition in James” in Robert L. Webb and John S. Kloppenborg, eds, Reading James with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of James. Library of New Testament Studies 342; New York: T&T Clark, 2007. 121 – 150.

Knox, W. L. “The Epistle of St. James.” JTS 46 (1945) 10–17.

Laws, Sophie. The Epistle of James. HNTC; New York: Harper and Row, 1980.

Martin, Ralph P. James. WBC 48; Waco: Word Books, 1988.

Mayor, Joseph P. The Epistle of St. James the Greek Text With Introduction, Notes and Comments, and Further Studies in the Epistle of St. James. London: Macmillan and Co., 1913.

McCartney, Dan G. James. BECNT; Grand Rapids: Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2009.

Meyer, Arnold. Das Rätsel des Jakobusbriefes. Giessen, 1930.

Mußner, Franz. Der Jakobusbrief. HTKNT; Freiberg: Herder, 1964, 1967.

Niebuhr, Karl-Wilhelm “Der jakobusbrief im Licht frühjüdischer Diasporabriefe.” NTS 44 (1998), 420-424.

Nienhuis, David R. Not by Paul Alone: The Formation of the Catholic Epistle Collection and the Christian Canon. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2007.

Painter, John. Just James: The Brother of Jesus in History and Tradition. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1999.

Popkes, Wiard. Der Brief des Jakobus. ThKNT 14; Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2001.

Reicke, Bo Ivar. The Epistles of James, Peter and Jude. AB; Garden City, New York, 1964.

Idem. Diakonie, Festfreude und Zelos. UU Å; Uppsala, 1951.


Ropes, James Hardy. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle of St. James. ICC; New York: C. Scribner's Sons, 1916.

Schlatter, Adolf. Der Brief des Jakobus. Stuttgart, 1932.

Seitz, O. J. F. “Two Spirits in Man: An Essay in Biblical Exegesis.” NTS 6 (1959) 82–95.

Spitta, F. Der Brief des Jakobus untersucht. Göttingen, 1896.

Idem. “Das Testaments Hiobs und das Neue Testament,” in Zur Geschichte und Literature des Urchristentums. Göttingen, 1907, III/2, 139-206.

Thomas, J. “Anfechtung und Vorfreude,” KD 14 (1968) 183–206.

Wall, Robert W. Community of the Wise: The Letter of James. The New Testament in Context; Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1997.

Ward, Roy Bowen. “Partiality in the Assembly: James 2:2–4.” HTR 62 (1969) 87–97.

Idem. “The Works of Abraham: James 2:14–26.” HTR 61 (1968) 283–290.

Wessel, W. W. “An Inquiry into the Origin, Literary Character, Historical and Religious Significance of the Epistle of James.” Ph. D. diss., Edinburgh, 1953.

1PeterAchtemeier, Paul J. 1 Peter. Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1996.

Balch, D. L. Let Wives Be Submissive: The Domestic Code in 1 Peter. SBLMS 26. Ed. J. Crenshaw. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1981.

Bauer, J. B. “Der erste Petrusbrief und die Verfolgung unter Domitian.” ErfTSt 38 (1977), 513–27. Also in Die Kirche des Anfangs: Festschrift für H. Schürmann. Ed. R. Schnackenburg. Leipzig: St. Benno Verlag, 1978, 513–27.

Blazen, I. T. “Suffering and Cessation from Sin according to 1 Peter 4:1.” AUSemSt 21 (1983), 27–50.

Beare, Francis Wright. The First Epistle of Peter. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1970.

Best, Ernst. 1 Peter. NCB; Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1971, 1982.

Boismard, M.-É. Quatres hymnes baptismales dans la première épître de Pierre. Lectio Divina 30. Paris: Editions du Cerf, 1961.

Bornemann, W. “Der erste Petrusbrief—eine Taufrede des Silvanus?” ZNW 19 (1919/20), 143–65.

Brown, R. E., Donfried, K. P., and Reumann, J., eds. Peter in the New Testament. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1973.

Brox, N. Der erste Petrusbrief. 2nd ed. EKKNT 21. Zürich: Benziger, 1986.

Brox, N. Zeuge und Märtyrer. Untersuchungen zur frühchristlichen Zeugnis-Terminologie. Munich, 1961.

Brown, J. P. “Synoptic Parallels in the Epistles and Form-History.” NTS 10 (1963–64), 27–48.


Burridge, Richard A. “The Gospels and Acts.” In Stanely E. Porter, ed., Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenstic Period 330 B.C. – A. D. 400. Boston/Leiden: Brill, 2001.

Burtness, J. H. “Sharing the Suffering of God in the Life of the World.” Interp 23 (1969), 277–88.

Idem. Zeuge und Märtyrer. Untersuchungen zur frühchristlichen Zeugnis-Terminologie. Munich, 1961.

Campbell, Barth L. Honor, Shame, and the Rhetoric of 1 Peter. SBL Dissertation Series 160. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1998.

Campbell, J. B. “Domitian,” in The Oxford Campanion to Classical Civilization, ed. Simone Hornblower and Anthony Spawforth. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. 237 – 238.

Chevallier, M. A. “Condition et vocation des chrétiens en diaspora: remarques exégétiques sur la 1re Épître de Pierre.” RechSR 48 (1974), 387–400.

Clemen, C. “The First Epistle of St. Peter and the Book of Enoch.” Exp ser. 6/4 (1902), 316–20.

Cross, F. L. 1 Peter: A Paschal Liturgy. London: Mowbray, 1954.

Cullmann, O. Petrus. Jünger-Apostel-Märtyrer. 2nd ed. Zürich: Zwingli, 1960; English translation Peter: Disciple, Apostle, Martyr. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1962.

Dalton, W. J. Christ’s Proclamation to the Spirits: A Study of 1 Peter 3:18–4:6. AnalBib 23. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1965.

Danker, F. W. “1 Peter 1:24 – 2:17: A Consolatory Pericope.” ZNW 58 (1967) 93 – 102.

Davids, Peter H. “A Silent Witness in Marriage: 1 Pet 3:1-7” in Ronald W. Pierce and Rebecca Merrill Groothuis, eds., Discovering Biblical Equality: Complementarity Without Hierarchy. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2004. 224 – 238.

Idem. The Epistle of 1 Peter. NICNT; Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1990.

Elliott, J. H. The Elect and the Holy: An Exegetical Examination of 1 Peter 2:4–10 and the Phrase βασίλειον ἱεράτευμα. NovTSup 12. Leiden: Brill, 1966.

Elliott, John H. 1 Peter: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 37. New York: Doubleday, 2000.

Elliott, J. H. 1 Peter. Estrangement and Community. Chicago: Franciscan Herald, 1979.

Elliott, J. H. A Home for the Homeless: A Sociological Exegesis of 1 Peter, Its Situation and Strategy. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1981.


Elliott, J. H. “The Rehabilitation of an Exegetical Stepchild: 1 Peter in Recent Research.” JBL 95 (1976), 243–54. Reprinted in Perspectives on First Peter. Ed. C. H. Talbert. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1986, 3–16.

Filson, F. V. “Partakers with Christ: Suffering in First Peter.” Interp 9 (1955), 400–412.

Furnish, V. P. “Elect Sojourners in Christ: An Approach to the Theology of 1 Peter.” PSTJ 28 (1975), 1–11.

Goldstein, H. “Die politischen Paraenesen in 1 Petr. 2 und Röm. 13.” BibLeb 14 (1973), 88–104.

Goppelt, L. Der erste Petrusbrief. MeyerK 12. Ed. F. Hahn. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1978.

Green, Joel B. 1 Peter. Two Horizons New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2007.

Gross, Carl D. “Are the Wives of 1 Pet 3:7 Christian?” JSNT 35 (1989) 89 – 96.

Grudem, Wayne. 1 Peter. Tyndale NT Commentaries: Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988.

Gundry, R. H. “Further ‘Verba’ on ‘Verba Christi’ in First Peter.” Bib 55 (1974), 211–32.

Idem. “ ‘Verba Christi,’ in I Peter: Their Implications Concerning the Authorship of I Peter and the Authenticity of the Gospel Tradition.” NTS 13 (1966–67), 336–50.

Hengel, Martin. Der unterschätzte Petrus: Zwei Studien. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.

Hill, D. “On Suffering and Baptism in 1 Peter.” NovT 18 (1976), 181–89.

Holdsworth, J. “The Sufferings in 1 Peter and ‘Missionary Apocalyptic.’ ” In Studia Biblica 3. Ed. E. A. Livingstone. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1980, 225–32.

Holtzmann, O. Die Petrusbrief. In Das Neue Testament nach dem Stuttgarter griechischen Text übersetzt und erklärt 2. Giessen, 1926.

Horrell, David G. 1 Peter. New Testament Guides. London/ New York: T & T. Clark, 2008.

Huther, J. E. Kritisch-exegetisches Handbuch über den 1. Brief des Petrus, den Brief des Judas und den 2. Brief des Petrus. 4th ed. MeyerK 12. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1877. English translation D. B. Croom, Critical and Exegetical Handbook to the General Epistles of Peter and Jude. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1881.

Jobes, Karen H. 1 Peter. BECNT. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2005.

Jobes, Karen H. “The Syntax of 1 Peter: Just How Good is the Greek?” BBR 13:2 (2003) 159-173.

Jonsen, A. R. “The Moral Teaching of the First Epistle of St. Peter.” SciEcc 16 (1964), 93–105.


Lapham, F. Peter: The Myth, the Man and the Writings: A Study of Early Petrine Text and Tradition. JSNTsup 239. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2003.

Lohmeyer, E. “Probleme paulinischer Theologie: I. Briefliche Grussüberschriften.” ZNW 26 (1927), 158–73.

Martin, Troy W. Metaphor and Composition in 1 Peter. SBL Dissertatioin Series 131. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1992.

Idem. “The TestAbr and the Background of 1 Pet 3:6.” ZAW 90 (1999) 139-146.

Michaels, J. Ramsey. “1 Peter,” DLNT 914-923.

Michaels, J. R. “Eschatology in I Peter III.17.” NTS 13 (1966–67), 394–401.

Michaels, J. R. 1 Peter. Word Biblical Commentary 49. Waco, TX: Word Books, 1988.

Idem. “Jewish and Christian Apocalyptic Letters: 1 Peter, Revelation, and 2 Baruch 78–87.” SBL Seminar Papers 26 (1987), 268–75.

Millauer, H. Leiden als Gnade: eine traditionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur Leidenstheologie des ersten Petrusbriefes. Bern: H. Lang, 1976.

Nauck, W. “Freude im Leiden: zum Problem einer urchristlichen Verfolgungstradition.” ZNW 46 (1955), 68–80.

Perkins, Pheme. Peter: Apostle for the Whole Church. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2000.

Piper, John “Hope as the Motivation of Love: 1 Peter 3:9–12.” NTS 26 (1980) 212–31.

Richardson, R. L., Jr. “From ‘Subjection to Authority’ to ‘Mutual Submission’: The Ethic of Subordination in 1 Peter.” Faith Mission 4 (1987), 70–80.

Richards, E. Randolph Paul and First-Century Letter Writing: Secretaries, Composition and Collection. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2004.

Idem. “Silvanus Was Not Peter’s Secretary: Theological Bias in Reading bias in Interpreting dia Silvanou ... egrapsa in 1 Pet 5:12.” JETS 43.3 (2000) 417-32.

Schattenmann, J. “The Little Apocalypse of the Synoptics and the First Epistle of Peter.” TToday 11 (1954–55), 193–98.

Schelkle, K. H. “Das Leiden des Gottesknechtes als Form christlichen Lebens (nach dem 1. Petrusbrief).” BibK 16 (1961), 14–16.


Schrage, W. “Zur Ethik der neutestamentlichen Haustafeln.” NTS 21 (1974–75), 1–22.

Schutter, W. L. Hermeneutic and Composition in First Peter. WUNT 2.30. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1989.

Schwank, B. “Wir Freie—aber als Sklaven Gottes (1 Petr. 2:16): Das Verhältnis der Christen zur Staatsmacht nach dem ersten Petrusbrief.” ErbAuf 36 (1960), 5–12.

Selwyn, Edward Gordon. The First Epistle of St. Peter. Macmillan, 19462, 1969.

Idem. “The Persecutions in I Peter.” Bulletin of the Society for New Testament Studies 1 (1950), 39–50.

Senior, D. “The Conduct of Christians in the World (1 Pet. 2:11–3:12).” Review and Expositor 79 (1982), 427–38.

Sleeper, C. F. “Political Responsibility According to 1 Peter.” NovT 10 (1968), 270–86.

Sly, Dorothy I. "I Peter 3:6b in the Light of Philo and Josephus." JBL 110 (1991) 126 - 129.

Spicq, C. Les Épîtres de Saint Pierre. La Sainte Bible. Paris: Gabalda, 1966.

Steuernagel, V. “An Exiled Community as a Mission Community: A Study Based on 1 Peter 2:9, 10.” Evangelical Review of Theology 10 (1986), 8–18.

Sylva, D. “The Critical Exploration of 1 Peter.” In Perspectives on First Peter. Ed. C. H. Talbert. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1986, 17–36.

Talbert, C. H., ed. Perspectives on First Peter. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1986.

Thomas, J. “Anfechtung und Vorfreude: Ein biblisches Thema nach Jakobus 1:2–18, im Zusammenhang mit Ps 126, Röm 5:3–5 und 1 Petr 1:5–7, formkritisch untersucht und parakletish ausgelegt.” KerD 14 (1968), 183–206.

Thompson, J. W. “ ‘Be Submissive to your Masters’: A Study of 1 Pt 2:18–25.” ResQ 9, 2 (1966), 66–78.

Thurén, Lauri. Argument and Theology in 1 Peter: The Origins of Christian Paraenesis. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 114. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1995.

Idem. “The General New Testament Writings.” In Stanley E. Porter, ed. Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B.C. – A. D. 400. Leiden: Brill, 2001. 596 - 599.

Idem. The Rhetorical Strategy of 1 Peter. Åbo: Åbo Academy Press, 1990.

Unnik, W. C. van. “The Teaching of Good Works in I Peter.” NTS 1 (1954–55), 92–110.

Utley, Bob. The Gospel According to Peter: Mark and I and II Peter. Study Guide Commentary Series, NT 2. Marshall TX: Bible Lessons International, 2000.

Villiers, J. L. de. “Joy in Suffering in 1 Peter.” Neot 9 (1975), 64–86.


Volkmar, G. “Über die katholischen Briefe und Henoch.” ZWT 4 (1961), 422–36.

Webb, R. L. The Apocalyptic Perspective of First Peter. Unpublished Th.M. thesis, Regent College, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1986.

Webb, Robert L. and Bauman-Martin, Betsy, eds. Reading First Peter with New Eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of First Peter. Library of New Testament Studies 364. London/New York: T & T Clark, 2007.

Witherington, Ben, III. “Not so idle thoughts about eidolothuton.” Tyndale Bulletin 44.2 (1993) 237-54.

Workman, Herbert B. Persecution in the Early Church. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.

2 Peter – JudeBauckham, Richard J. Jude, 2 Peter. WBC 50. Waco: Word Books, 1983.

Charles, J. Daryl. 2 Peter, Jude. In 1 – 2 Peter, Jude. Believers Church Bible Commentary; Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 1999.

Danker, Frederick W. “2 Peter.” In Gerhard Krodel, ed. The General Letters. Proclamation Commentaries; Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995. 84-93.

Davids, Peter H. The Letters of 2 Peter and Jude. The Pillar New Testament Commentary; Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2006.

Elliott, John H. I – II Peter/ Jude. ACNT; Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1982.

Green, E. M. B. (Michael). The Second Epistle of Peter and the Epistle of Jude. TNTC; Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1968.

Grundmann, Walter. Der Brief des Judas und der zweite Brief des Petrus. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1974.

James, M. R. (Montague Rhodes). The Second Epistle General of Peter and the Epistle of Jude. CGTSC; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1912.

Kraftchick, Steven J. Jude, 2 Peter. ANTC; Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2002.

Lucas, Dick, and Green, Christopher. The Message of 2 Peter and Jude: the promise of his coming. The Bible Speaks Today; Leicester, UK/ Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity Press, 1995.

Mayor, Joseph B. The Epistles of Jude and II Peter. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, (1901) 1979.

Neyrey, Jerome H. 2 Peter, Jude. AB 37C; New York: Doubleday, 1993.

Schrage, Wolfgang. Der zweite Petrusbrief. Der Judasbrief. In Host R. Balz and Wolfgang Schrage. Die „Katholische“ Briefe; die Briefe des Jakobus, Petrus, Johannes und Judas, übersetzt und erklärt. NTD 10; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1973.


Spitta, Friedrich. Die zweite Brief des Petrus und der Brief des Judas. Halle a. S.: Verlag und Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses, 1885.

Vögtle, Anton. Der Judasbrief der 2. Petrusbrief. EKK 22; Solothurn and Dusseldorf/ Neukirchen-Vluyn: Benzinger Verlag/ Neukirchener Verlag, 1994.

2 PeterAdams, Edward. “Where is the Promise of his Coming? The Complaint of the Scoffers

in 2 Peter 3.4.” NTS 51 (2005) 106-122.

Bauckham, Richard J. “The Delay of the Parousia.” Tyndale Bulletin 31 (1980) 3-36.

Bonus, A. “2 Peter III. 10.”ExpT 32 (1920-1921) 280-281.

Boobyer, G. H. “The Indebtedness of 2 Peter to 1 Peter.” In A. J. B. Higgins, ed., New Testament Essays: Studies in Memory of T. W. Manson. Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 1959. 34-53.

Chilton, Bruce D. “The Transfiguration: Dominical Assurance and Apostolic Vision.” NTS 27 (1980–81) 120–121.

Conti, Martino. «La Sophia di 2 Petr. 3.15.» Rivsta Biblica 17 (1969) 121-138.

Danker, Frederick W. “2 Peter: A Solemn Decree,” CBQ 40 (1978) 64-82.

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. "The Name Simon," in J. A. Fitzmyer, Essays on the Semitic Background of the New Testament. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1971. 105-112.

Gilmour, Michael J. The Significance of Parallels between 2 Peter and Other Early Christian Literature. Academica Biblical 10; Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.

Green, E. M. B. (Michael) 2 Peter Reconsidered. London; Tyndale Press, 1960.

Haaker, Klaus, and Schäfer, P. „Nachbiblische Traditionen vom Tod des Mose.“ In O. Betz, K. Haaker, and M. Hengel, eds., Josephus-Studien: Untersuchungen zu Josephus, dem antiken Judentum und dem Neuen Testament: Otto Michel zum 70. Geburtstag gewidmet. Götteningen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1974. 147-174.

Käsemann, Ernst. "An Apologia for Primitive Christian Eschatology." In Essays on New Testament Themes. Trans. W. J. Montague. SBT 41; London: SCM Press, 1964. 169-195. =“Apologie der urchristlichen Eschatologie,” in Exegetische Versuche und Besinnungen I. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1960, 1970. 135-157

Kee, Howard Clark. “The Terminology of Mark’s Exorcism Stories,” NTS 14 (1968) 232-246.

Kee, Howard Clark. “The Transfiguration in Mark: Epiphany or Apocalyptic Vision?” In John Reumann ed., Understanding the Sacred Text. (Festschrift for M. S. Enslin; Valley Forge, PA: Judson Press, 1972) 137–152.


Kraus, Thomas J. Sprache, Stil und historischer Ort des zweiten Petrusbriefes. WUNT 2. Reihe 136; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.

Loewenstamm, Samuel E. „The Death of Moses.” In G. W. E. Nickelsburg, ed., Studies on the Testament of Abraham. SBLSCS 6; Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1976. 185-217.

Marín, F. "Apostolícidad de los escritos neotestmentarios." Estudios Eclesiaticos 50 (1975) 226.

McNamara, Martin. “The Unity of Second Peter: A Reconsideration.” Scr 12 (1960) 13-19.

McRae, G. W. “Why the Church Rejected Gnosticism.” In E. P. Sanders, ed., Jewish and Christian Self-Definition. London: SCM, 1980. 1:128-130.

Meier, Sam. “2 Peter 3:3-7 – an Early Jewish and Christian Response to Eschatological Scepticism.” BZ 32 (1988) 255-257.

Milligan, G. “2 Peter III. 10.”ExpT 32 (1920-1921) 331.

Molland, Einar. "La thèse 'La prophétie n'est jamais venue de la volonté de l'homme' (2 Pierre I, 21) et les Pseudo-Clémentines." In Opuscula Patristiuca. BTN 2; Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1970. 64–77. = ST 9 (1955) 67-85.

Neyrey, Jerome H. “The apologetic use of the transfiguration in 2 Peter 1:16-21.” CBQ 42:2 (1980) 504-519.

Neyrey, Jerome H. “The Form and Background of the Polemic in 2 Peter,” JBL 99:3 (1980) 407 – 431.

Neyrey, Jerome H. "The Form and Background of the Polemic in 2 Peter." Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 1977.

Picirelli, Robert E. “The meaning of ‘Epignosis’.” EvQ 47 (1975) 85-93.

Raphael, Lawrence W. "The Teaching of Writing an Ethical Will." Judaism 48 (1999) 174-180.

Reimer, Andy M. “In the Beginning . . . Lessons learned in teaching Genesis 1 to evangelical college students.” Canadian Evangelical Review 29 (2005) 32-44.

Riemer, Jack and Stampfer, Nathaniel. Ethical Wills: A Modern Jewish Treasury. New York: Schocken, 1983.

Riesner, Rainer. “Der zweite Petrus-Brief und die Eschatologie.“ In Gerhard Maier, ed., Zukunftserwartung in biblischer Sicht: Beitrage zur Eschatologie. Wuppertal: R. Brockhaus, 1984. 124-143.

Roberts, J. W. “A Note on the Meaning of II Peter 3:10d.” Restoration Quarterly 6 (1962 32-33.

Schlosser, Jacques. «Les jours de Noé et de Lot: A propos de Luc, XVII, 26-30.» Revue Biblique 80 (1973) 13-36.


Schmitals, Walter. “Zur Abfassung und ältesten Sammlung der paulinischen Hauptbriefe.” [On the Composition and Earliest Collection of the Major Epistles of Paul.] ZNW 51 (1960) 225-245.

Schrage, Wolfgang, and Balz, Horst. Die “katholischen” Briefe: die Briefe des Jakobus, Petrus, Johannes und Judas. NTD 10; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 197311.

Sibinga, J. Smit. "Une citation du Cantique dans la Secunda Petri." RB 73 (1966) 107–118.

Sickenberger, Joseph. „Engels- oder Teufelslästerer im Judasbrief (8-10) und im 2. Petrusbriefe (2, 10-12)?“ in T. Siebs, ed., Festschrift zu Jahrhundertfeier der Universität zu Breslau. MSGVK 13-14; 1911-1912. 621-639.

Smith, Terence V. Petrine Controversies in Early Christianity: attitudes towards Peter in Christian writings of the first two centuries. WUNT 2:15; Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1985.

Snyder, Graydon F. “The Tobspruch in the New Testament.” NTS 23:1 (1976-1977) 117-120.

Snyder, John I. The Promise of His Coming - The Eschatology of 2 Peter. San Mateo, CA, 1986.

Strobel, August. Untersuchungen zum eschatologischen Verzögerungsproblem auf Grund der spätjudisch-urchristlichen Geschichte von Habakuk 2,2 ff. NovTSup 2; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1961.

Taylor, Vincent. “Does the New Testament Call Jesus ‘God’?” in Vincent Taylor, New Testament Essays. London: Epworth, 1970. 83-89.

Thiede, Carson Peter. “A Pagan Reader of 2 Peter: Cosmis Conflagration in 2 Peter 3 and the Octavius of Minucius Felix.” JSNT 26 (1986) 79-96.

Thurén, Lauri. “The Relationship between 2 Peter and Jude – A Classical Problem Resolved?” In Jacques Schlosser, ed. The Catholic Epistles and the Tradition. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 176; Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2004. 451-460.

Townsend, Michael J. “Exit the Agape?” ExpT 90 (1978-1979) 356-371.

Vermes, Geza. “The Targumic Versions of Gen 4:3-16.” In Geza Vermes, Post-Biblical Jewish Studies. Leiden: Brill, 1975. 96-100.

Vögtle, Anton. Das neue Testament und die Zukunft des Kosmos. Düsseldorf: Patmos-Verlag, 1970.

von Allmen, Daniel. “L’apocalyptique juive et le retard de la parousie en II Pierre 3:1-13.” Revue de Théologie et Philosophie 16 (1966) 255-274.

Watson, Duane Frederick. Invention Arrangement and Style: Rhetorical Criticism of Jude and 2 Peter. SBLDS 104; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988.


Wenham, David. “Being ‘Found’ on the Last Day: New Light on 2 Peter 3.10 and 2 Corinthians 5.3.” NTS 33 (1989) 477-479.

Werdermann, Hermann. Das Irrlehrer des Judas- und 2. Petrusbriefes. BFCT 17/6; Gütersloh: C. Bertelsmann, 1913.

White, John L. The Form and Function of the Body of the Greek Letter. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 19722.

Wilson, W. E. “Heurethesetai in 2 Pet. iii. 10.” ExpT 32 (1920-1921) 44-45.

Wolters, Al. “‘Partners of the Deity’: A Covenantal Reading of 2 Peter 1:4.” Calvin Theological Journal 25 (1990) 28-44.

Wolters, Al. “Postscript to ‘Partners of the Deity’.” Calvin Theological Journal 26 (1991) 418-420.

Wolters, Al. “Worldview and Textual Criticism in 2 Peter 3:10.” WTJ 49 (1987) 405-413.

Zahn, Theodor. Introduction to the New Testament. New York : Scribners, 1909.

JudeBarnes, Thomas. “The Epistle of Jude: A Study in the Marcosian Heresy.” JTS 6

(1905) 391-411.

Bauckham, Richard J. “A Note on a Problem in the Greek Version of 1 Enoch i.9.” JTS 32 (1981) 136-138.

Bauckham, Richard J. Jude and the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1990.

Berger, Klaus. “Der Streit des guten and des bösen Engels um die Seele: Beobachtungen zu 4QAmrb und Judas 9.“ JSJ 4 (1973) 1-18.

Bieder, Werner. “Judas 22f.: „Hous de eate en phobōboi,“ Theologische Zeitschrift 6 (1950) 75-77.

Birdsall, J. Neville. „The Text of Jude in P72.” JTS 14 (1963) 394-399.

Black, Matthew. “Critical and exegetical notes on three New Testament texts Hebrews xi. 11, Jude 5, James 1. 27.” In Apophoreta: Festschrift für Ernst Haenchen. BZNW 30; Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann, 1964. 39-45.

Black, Matthew. “The Maranatha Invocation and Jude 14, 15 (I Enoch I:9).” In Barnabas Lindars and Stephen S. Smalley, eds., Christ and Spirit in the New Testament: Studies in Honour of Charles Francis Digby Moule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. 189-196.

Boobyer, George H. “The Verbs in Jude 11.” NTS 5 (1958) 45-47.

Charles, J. Daryl. “Jude’s Use of Pseudepigraphical Source-Material as Part of a Literary Strategy.” NTS 37 (1991) 130-145.

Charles, J. Daryl. “Literary Artifice in the Epistle of Jude.” ZNW 82 (1991) 106-124.


Charles, J. Daryl. “The Use of Tradition-Material in the Epistle of Jude.” Undated paper read at a SBL meeting.

Charles, J. Daryl. “’Those’ and ‘These’: The Use of the Old Testament in the Epistle of Jude.” JSNT 38 (1990) 109-124.

Chase, Frederic Henry. "Jude, Epistle of." In James Hastings, ed., Dictionary of the Bible. 2:799-206.

Daniel, Constantin. “La mention des Esséniens dans le texte grec de l‘épître de S. Jude. Muséon 81 (1968) 503-521.

Dubarle, André M. «Le péché des anges dans l‘épître de Jude.» Memorial J. Chaine. Lyons: Facultés Catholiques, 1950. 145-148.

du Plessis, O. J. “The Authorship of the Epistle of Jude.” In Biblical Essays 1966: Proceedings of the Ninth Meeting of “Die Ou-Testamentiese Werkgemeenskap in Suid-Afrika,” and Proceedings of the Second Meeting of “Die Nuwe-Testamentiese Werkgemeenskam van Suid-Afrika.” Potchefstroom, South Africa: Potchefstroom Herlad (Edms.) Beperk, 1966. 191-199.

Ellis, E. Earle. “Prophecy and Hermeneutic in Jude.” In E. E. Ellis, Prophecy and Hermeneutic in Early Christianity. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1978. 220-236.

Fossum, Jarl. “Kurios Jesus as the Angel of the Lord in Jude 5-7.” NTS 33:2 (1987) 226-243.

Gunther, John J. “The Alexandrian Epistle of Jude.” NTS 30:4 (1984) 549-562.

Hiebert, D. Edmond. “Selected Studies from Jude. Part 2: An Exposition of Jude 12 – 16.” BibSac 142 (1985) 245-249.

Hiebert, D. Edmond. “Selected Studies from Jude. Part 3: An Exposition of Jude 17 – 23.” BibSac 142 (1985) 355-366.

Kellett, E. E. “Note on Jude 5.” ExpT 15 (1903-1904) 381.

Klijn, Albertus K. J. “Jude 5-7.“ In William C. Weinrich, ed., The New Testament Age: Essays in Honor of Bo Reicke. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1984. Vol 1: 237-244.

Krodel, Gerhard. “Jude.” In Gerhard Krodel, ed. The General Letters. Proclamation Commentaries; Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995.94-109.

Kubo, Sakae. „Jude 22-23: Two-division Form or Three?” In E. J. Epp and G. D. Fee, eds., New Testament Text Criticism: Its Significance for Exegesis. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981. 239-253.

Landon, Charles. A Text-Critical Study of the Epistle of Jude. JSNTsup 135; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.

Magass, Walter. “Semiotik eine Ketzerpolemik am Beispiel von Judas 12f.“ Linguistica Biblica 19 (1972) 36-47.


Maier, Freidrich. “Zur Erklärung des Judasbriefes (Jud 5).“ BZ 2 (1904) 391-397.

Mees, Michael. “Papyrus Bodmer VII (p72) und die Zitate aus den Judasbrief bei Clemens von Alexandrien.“ Ciudad de Dios 181 (1968) 551-559.

Oleson, John. P. “An Echo of Hesiod’s Theogony vv 190-2 in Jude 13.” NTS 25 (1979) 492-503.

Osburn, Carroll D. “The Christological Use of I Enoch I.9 in Jude 14 – 15.” NTS 23 (1977) 334-341.

Osburn, Carroll D. “The Text of Jude 5.” Bib 62 (1981) 107-115.

Osburn, Carroll D. “The Text of Jude 22 – 23.” ZNW 63 (1972) 139-144.

Ross, John M. “Church Discipline in Jude 22 – 23.” ExpT 100 (1989) 297-298.

Sellin, Gerhard. “Die Häretiker des Judsabriefes,” ZNW 77:3-4 (1986) 206-225.

Whallon, William. “Should We Keep, Omit, or Alter the hoi in Jude 12?” NTS 34 (1988) 56-59.

Whitaker, G. H. “Faith’s Function in St Jude’s Epistle,” ExpTim 29 (1917-1918) 425.

Wikgren, Allen P. “Some Problems in Jude 5.” In B. L. Daniels and M. Jack. Suggs, eds., Studies in the History and Text of the New Testament in honor of Kenneth Willis Clark. SD 29; Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1967. 147-152


Documents

davidsnet.wsdavidsnet.ws/biblical/page11/files/NT637GeneralEpistles… · Web viewThis paper may be submitted electronically (in .doc, .docx, .wpf, or .pdf format – check with