22

 · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315

  • Upload
    vandung

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 2:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 3:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 4:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 5:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 6:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 7:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 8:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 9:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 10:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 11:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 12:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 13:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 14:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 15:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 16:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 17:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 18:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 19:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 20:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 21:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 22:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315