Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RWE Innogy UK | Triton Knoll Electrical System, Onshore Crossing Schedule
Volume 4, Annex 5.1 Fish and Shellfish Technical Baseline Report
Triton Knoll Electrical System
Environmental Statement, April 2015.
Application Document 6.2.4.5.1
Pursuant to: APFP Reg. 5(2)(a)
1
RWE Innogy UK | Triton Knoll Electrical System, Fish and Shellfish Ecology Baseline
Triton Knoll Electrical System
Environmental Statement
Volume 4: Annex 5.1 Fish and Shellfish
Baseline
April 2015
Drafted By: RWE Innogy UK Approved By: Date of Approval Revision A
Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Ltd Auckland House Great Western Way Swindon Wiltshire, SN5 8ZT
T +44 (0)845 720 090 F +44 (0)845 720 050 I www.rweinnogy.com
www.rweinnogy.com/tritonknoll [email protected]
Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Copyright © 2015 RWE Innogy UK Ltd All pre-existing rights reserved.
Liability In preparation of this document Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited (TKOWFL), a joint venture between RWE Innogy UK (RWE) and Statkraft UK, subconsultants working on behalf of TKOWFL, have made reasonable efforts to ensure that the content is accurate, up to date and complete for the purpose for which it was prepared. Neither TKOWFL nor their subcontractors make any warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of material supplied. Other than any liability on TKOWFL or their subcontractors detailed in the contracts between the parties for this work neither TKOWFL or their subcontractors shall have any liability for any loss, damage, injury, claim, expense, cost or other consequence arising as a result of use or reliance upon any information contained in or omitted from this document. Any persons intending to use this document should satisfy themselves as to its applicability for their intended purpose. Where appropriate, the user of this document has the obligation to employ safe working practices for any activities referred to and to adopt specific practices appropriate to local conditions.
Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited have been awarded EU TEN-E funding to support the development of the Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Electrical System located in both UK Territorial waters and the UK’s Exclusive Economic Zone. The funding which is to be matched will support a number of surveys, engineering reports, and environmental impact assessment studies for the Triton Knoll Electrical System. The studies will form part of the formal documentation that will accompany the Development Consent Order which will be submitted to the Planning Inspectorate. The sum of €1,159,559 has been granted and the process to reclaim this funding is ongoing.
Kim Gauld-Clark
28/03/15
FISH AND
SHELLFISH
ECOLOGY
TECHNICAL
BASELINE
REPORT
JUNE 2014 TRITON KNOLL ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT
Client
Client approval Gill Moore Date 28/03/2015
GoBe Consultants Ltd
Prepared by Dr Lauren Kirkland Date 18/06/14
Authorised by Sean Leake Date 19/06/2014
Signed
June 2014 1 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
CONTENTS
1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Background .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2. Study area ................................................................................................................ 1
2. Data Sources .................................................................................................................... 3
2.1. Overview .................................................................................................................. 3
2.2. Site-specific Triton Knoll Electrical System surveys ................................................. 3
2.3. Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Environmental Impact Assessment .................... 3
2.4. Additional sources of information ........................................................................... 4
2.5. Data limitations ........................................................................................................ 5
3. Baseline Conditions .......................................................................................................... 6
3.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6
3.2. Diversity, distribution and abundance ..................................................................... 6
3.3. Species of conservation importance ........................................................................ 9
3.4. Spawning and nursery areas .................................................................................. 10
3.5. Sandeel and herring spawning ............................................................................... 15
3.6. Potential herring and sandeel spawning habitat ................................................... 15
3.7. TKOWF site-specific surveys .................................................................................. 23
4. Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 25
5. References ..................................................................................................................... 26
HERRING AND SANDEEL SPAWNING APPENDIX A
SHELLFISH APPENDIX B
June 2014 2 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Location of study area and fish and shellfish surveys ............................................... 2
Figure 2: Spawning and nursery grounds for herring, sprat, cod and whiting in the vicinity of
the Triton Knoll Electrical System .......................................................................................... 12
Figure 3: Spawning and nursery grounds for sandeel, sole, plaice and lemon sole in the
vicinity of the Triton Knoll Electrical System .......................................................................... 13
Figure 4: Spawning and nursery grounds for anglerfish, spurdog, mackerel and thornback
ray in the vicinity of the Triton Knoll Electrical System ......................................................... 14
Figure 5: Atlantic herring preferred and marginal habitat types ........................................... 18
Figure 6: Atlantic herring heat map of habitat potential ....................................................... 19
Figure 7: Sandeel preferred and marginal habitat types ....................................................... 21
Figure 8: Sandeel heat map of habitat potential ................................................................... 22
Figure 9: Sediment sediments across the study area ............................................................ 24
June 2014 1 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
1.1.1. This report provides a contemporary and comprehensive review of data on fish and
shellfish ecology within the study area defined for the Triton Knoll Offshore Wind
Farm Electrical System project (referred to hereafter as the ‘Electrical System’ or
the ‘development’). The report has been prepared as part of the Evidence Plan1 and
the information compiled here forms the baseline characterisation upon which the
impact assessment will be based. Details on the proposed development will be
found in Volume 2, Chapter 1: Project Description.
1.1.2. As described in the Scoping Report for this development (RWE, 2014), previous
agreement has been reached with the Marine Management Organisation (MMO)
and their advisors that sufficient evidence on fish and shellfish ecology is available
from existing survey data to underpin the EIA, therefore no further characterisation
surveys are required at this pre-application stage. The MMO noted during
consultation that a systematic collation and overview of the existing evidence is
required to form the basis of the fish and shellfish ecology baseline and this report
has been written to fulfil this requirement. This report provides the technical
baseline for fish (both pelagic and demersal, including elasmobranch species) and
shellfish (molluscs and crustaceans) ecology within the Triton Knoll Electrical System
site and in the wider surrounding area.
1.1.3. The commercial exploitation of the fish and shellfish resource in and around the
Triton Knoll Electrical System site is described in Annex 8.1 and within Volume 2,
Chapter 8.
1.2. Study area
1.2.1. As fish are predominantly mobile, the study area for the proposed development is
relatively broad, with an approximate extent between the mouth of the Humber
estuary and the northern coast of Norfolk, in the southern North Sea. The limits of
the study area are presented in Figure 1:.
1 This is intended to be a working document that will be developed by the parties involved on an on-
going basis through the development of the EIA and up until the point of application (or until it is considered otherwise complete).
June 2014 2 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 1: Location of study area and fish and shellfish surveys
June 2014 3 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
1.2.2. The offshore study area for the development includes the TKOWF array area as well
as the more linear corridor (referred to henceforth as the export cable corridor)
beyond the array boundary up to mean high water spring (MHWS) mark. The study
area also includes a buffer area of 5km extending from the export cable corridor as
depicted in Figure 1. Whilst the export cable has subsequently been reduced from
2km to 1.1km, the buffer represents the maximum dispersion distance and provides
a maximum zone of secondary impacts from the cable installation works that may
arise during the construction of the Triton Knoll Electrical System. Reference to the
TKOWF ES suggests that the maximum adverse scenario arising from foundation
and inter-array cabling installation is 5km (RWE, 2011). As noted above the fish and
shellfish interest within the array area has previously been documented (see
TKOWF ES Volume 2, Chapter 4, Fish and Shellfish Resources), while the importance
of the corridor has not, until now, received such detailed analysis. Hence the
following sections focus on combining the work conducted for the TKOWF array
area with data falling within the export cable corridor study area.
2. Data Sources
2.1. Overview
2.1.1. Baseline characterisation data on fish and shellfish resources were gathered
through a desktop study combining the site specific TKOWF survey data with other
regional datasets.
2.2. Site-specific Triton Knoll Electrical System surveys
2.2.1. Site-specific geotechnical surveys were undertaken in 2010 and 2012 along the
Triton Knoll Electrical System cable route (Gardline, 2010; Osiris, 2013). Cone
Penetration Tests (CPT) and vibrocores were subject to Particle Size Distribution
(PSD) classification and the main characteristics of the surficial seabed sediments
were described in the Physical Environment Baseline Assessment (Annex 6.1).
2.3. Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Environmental Impact Assessment
2.3.1. Surveys commissioned by TKOWFL for the consented TKOWF (including stations
within or near the Triton Knoll Electrical System study area) including the following:
Ten seasonal demersal otter trawl surveys using a 9 m trawl with a 90 mm cod end were carried out during November 2008, February 2009 and May 2009;
Three sets of bi-monthly potting surveys during April 2009, June 2009 and August 2009, with up to 40 pots sampled at each sampling site during each of the surveys;
June 2014 4 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
An epibenthic 2 m beam trawl survey undertaken during September/October 2008 as part of the benthic ecology characterisation study (Volume 3: Annex E of the TKOWF ES). Although not designed to specifically sample for fish, data collected from inshore areas were sampled as these may be important nursery/spawning habitats for fish and shellfish found in the Greater Wash area. This survey provided further characterisation of the demersal fish communities in the TKOWF study area, particularly with respect to smaller species and juvenile fish that may have been missed using the otter trawl technique; and
A herring Clupea harengus larvae survey conducted 12th to 14th October 2009 (coinciding with the anticipated peak spawning period) which collected 32 samples throughout the Triton Knoll site and up to 20 km from the project boundary. A second herring larvae survey undertaken on 4th and 5th October 2010. This survey was able to focus more specifically on the potential impact areas based on the results of the site-specific modelling study.
2.3.2. The site specific TKOWF herring larvae data were supplemented with existing data
from the International Herring Larvae Survey (IHLS) conducted throughout the
North Sea during the same time period as the TKOWF herring larvae surveys (Rohlf
and Groger, 2009) and compared to long time-series data provided by IHLS surveys
of the area over the preceding 10 years.
2.4. Additional sources of information
2.4.1. A number of surveys have been conducted as part of other studies that sampled
station within (or close to) to Triton Knoll Electrical System study area. Most notably
these include the surveys conducted for the Lynn, Inner Dowsing and Lincs offshore
wind farms. These surveys commenced in the summer (early August) of 2004 and
proceeded into the summer (early June) of 2005. Surveys included the use of the
following methods:
Otter trawling;
Commercial 6m shrimp beam trawling;
Epibenthic 2m scientific beam trawling;
Longlining using an 100 hook rig; and
Potting (crab and lobster parlour pots).
2.4.2. All of the Lynn, Inner Dowsing and Lincs surveys were undertaken from licensed
commercial fishing vessels. The gear used for otter trawling, shrimp surveys, potting
and longlining was the same as that employed during commercial fishing activities.
Gear used was the same throughout each survey to ensure directly comparable
results. All trawl lines were aligned with the dominant tidal current flow (N-S), while
longlines were deployed across this (E-W). Sample locations for the Lynn, Inner
June 2014 5 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Dowsing and Lincs surveys are shown in Figure 1:, alongside the Humber Marine
Aggregate Regional Environmental Characterisation (MAREA) (HADA, 2012) data
points that have contributed to the regional understanding of the fish and shellfish
ecology.
2.4.3. Additional data sources used in this report also included:
Distribution of Spawning and Nursery Grounds as defined in Coull et al. (1998) (Fisheries Sensitivity Maps in British Waters) and in Ellis et al. (2010) (Mapping spawning and nursery areas of species to be considered in Marine Protected Areas (Marine Conservation Zones);
Humber Aggregate Dredging Association (HADA) (2012). Marine Aggregate
Regional Environmental Assessment of the Humber and Outer Wash Region;
Rogers, S.I., Millner, R.S., and Mead, T.A. (1998). The distribution and
abundance of young fish on the east and south coast of England (1981 to
1997). Cefas Science Series Technical Report Number 108;
Eastern IFCA, (2010). Annual Research Report 2010; and
Rogers, S. and Stocks, R. (2001). Strategic Environmental Assessment - SEA2
Technical Report 003 - Fish and Fisheries.
2.5. Data limitations
2.5.1. The description of spawning and nursery grounds provided in this report is primarily
based on the information presented in Ellis et al. (2012) and Coull et al. (1998). The
limitations of these sources of information should, however, be recognised. These
publications provide an indication of the general location of spawning and nursery
grounds. They do not define precise boundaries of spawning and nursery grounds,
particularly in the context of the relatively small footprint of the Triton Knoll
Electrical System. Similarly, the spawning times given in these publications
represent the maximum duration of spawning on a species/stock basis. In some
cases, the duration of spawning may be much more contracted, on a site specific
basis, than reported in Ellis et al. (2012) and Coull et al. (1998). Therefore, where
available, additional research publications have also been reviewed to provide site
specific information.
2.5.2. Mobile species, such as fish, exhibit varying spatial and temporal patterns. All the
wind farm project site specific surveys were undertaken to provide a semi-seasonal
description of the fish and shellfish. It should be noted, however, that the data
collected during these surveys represent snapshots of the fish and shellfish
June 2014 6 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
assemblage at the time of sampling and the fish and shellfish assemblages may vary
considerably both seasonally and annually.
2.5.3. It is important to note that although the data used in the characterisation of the fish
and shellfish baseline conditions span a long time period, with some sources
published over a decade ago, the information presented represents a long-term
dataset. Accordingly, this allows for a detailed overview of the characteristic fish
and shellfish species in the study area. The diversity and abundance of many
species, particularly demersal fish species, is linked to habitat types, which have
remained relatively constant in the study area, indicating no major shift in the fish
and shellfish communities over the time period of the data used in this report.
3. Baseline Conditions
3.1. Introduction
3.1.1. Extensive information on the fish and shellfish communities in the area around the
proposed development (i.e. between the Wash and the Humber) was compiled for
the TKOWF ES (Volume 2, Chapter 4). This included data obtained both from
extensive desk-based searches and from baseline surveys: ES Annexes E (benthic
survey including beam trawls), F1 (herring spawning), F2, (shellfish) and F3 (otter
trawling); a summary of these sources is provided below. This adds to an extensive
knowledge of the area based on other developments in the Greater Wash, such as
other offshore wind farms and areas licensed for aggregate extraction.
3.2. Diversity, distribution and abundance
3.2.1. Long-term surveys of small fish in the inshore area were conducted annually, during
the month of September, by Cefas from 1981-1997 (Rogers et al., 1998), and
included inshore waters between the Humber and the Wash, encompassing the
landfall of the proposed development. The following species were found to have a
high occurrence (i.e. stations where recorded/total stations sampled = >40%):
Whiting (Merlangius merlangus);
Nilsson’s pipefish (Syngnathus rostellatus);
Dragonets (Callionymidae);
Sand gobies (Pomatoschistus minutus);
Dab (Limanda limanda);
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa);
Dover sole (Solea solea);
Pogge (Agonus cataphractus); and
Sea snails (Liparis spp.).
June 2014 7 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
3.2.2. Additional species recorded in inshore waters in the vicinity of the landfall included
the following:
Thornback (Raja clavata) and spotted (R. montagui) rays;
Gadoids (cod Gadus morhua);
Bib (Trisopterus luscus);
Five-bearded (Ciliata mustela) and four-bearded (Enchelyopus cimbrius) rocklings;
Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus);
Sandeel (Ammodytidae);
Lesser weever (Echiichthys vipera);
Viviparous blenny (Zoarces viviparus);
Butterfish (Pholis gunnellus);
Solenette (Buglossidium luteum);
Flounder (Platichthys flesus);
Brill (Scophthalmus rhombus);
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus);
Scaldfish (Arnoglossus laterna);
Gurnards (tub Chelidonichthys lucerna and grey Eutrigla gurnardus);
Bull rout (Myoxocephalus scorpius); and
Sea scorpion (Taurulus bubalis).
3.2.3. Surveys were undertaken for the Lynn, Inner Dowsing and Lincs offshore wind farms
designed to obtain baseline information regarding diversity and abundance of fish
and invertebrates (particularly commercial species) from the vicinity of the
proposed Lynn, Inner Dowsing and Lincs offshore wind farm sites, with the aim of
describing the overall community structure in the area. These surveys commenced
in the summer (early August) of 2004 and proceeded into the summer (early June)
of 2005. The results of the surveys are outlined below:
Whiting was by far the most dominant demersal fish species of commercial interest in trawl catches with the exception of the May survey, where its abundance dropped to numbers similar to other species such as thornback ray and Dover sole;
Valuable target species of local commercial fisheries (cod, Dover sole, and thornback ray) were generally caught in low numbers and catches showed a strong seasonal variation;
‘Core’ fish species widely recorded throughout the surveys were thornback ray, bib, whiting, bull rout, dragonet and dab. Other common and abundant small fish included pogge, lesser weever, and common sea snail;
Elasmobranchs (including those caught in a targeted longline survey) were represented by a number of species, although only thornback ray was recorded throughout the year; other taxa (spotted ray, smallspotted
June 2014 8 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula), smoothhound (Mustelus spp.) and tope (Galeorhinus galeus) were recorded less frequently with diversity and abundance highest in May and June;
Surveys for commercially important shrimp conducted between November and March showed that pink shrimp (Pandalus montagui) was the dominant shrimp species, and was widely recorded across the survey area excepting a single station very close inshore (just to the north of Skegness); at this station, brown shrimp (Crangon crangon) overwhelmingly dominated. Pink shrimp catches peaked in December and February, with brown shrimp catches peaking in early December; and
Potting surveys for crab/lobster were dominated by edible crab (Cancer pagurus); crab catches peaked in December, with lobster catches peaking in August.
3.2.4. Surveys commissioned by TKOWFL for the now consented TKOWF (including
stations within or near the Triton Knoll Electrical System study area). The results of
the surveys are outlined below:
Low species diversity with a total of 33 species of fish were recorded during the otter trawl and epibenthic beam trawl surveys, with dominance by relatively small demersal species including dab (Limanda limanda), common sole (Solea solea), bull-rout (Myoxocephalus scorpius), pogge (Agonus cataphractus), dragonet (Callionymus lyra), sea snails (Liparis spp.) and gobies (Pomatoschistus spp);
There were also subtle differences between the seasons, with winter assemblages generally distinct from those found during autumn and spring, although these differences were largely explained by the variation in abundance of the two most numerically dominant species, dab and bull-rout (dab being less abundant during the winter survey and bull-rout less abundant during the spring survey);
Common sole was one of the commercially important finfish species found in this area during the site specific surveys. Other commercially important species also recorded included cod (Gadus morhua); plaice (Pleuronectes platessa); whiting (Merlangius merlangus); and lemon sole (Microstomus kitt). Only two species of commercially important elasmobranch were recorded, both in very small numbers and as juveniles: thornback ray (Raja clavata) and blonde ray (Raja brachyura);
The four main commercially important shellfish in the area were common lobster (Homarus gammarus), edible crab (Cancer pagurus), velvet swimming crab (Necora puber) and common whelk (Buccinum undatum);
Velvet swimming crab and lobster were particularly associated with the coarser, gravelly sediments within the TKOWF array area;
Edible crab was recorded throughout the area, on all substrates, although the highest abundances of individuals were found to be associated with
June 2014 9 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
gravelly substrates with greatest abundance to the west of the TKOWF array area. The shallow, sandy inshore area tended to be dominated by juveniles of this species;
The common whelk was seasonally abundant (peak numbers in April) along the sandy inshore sections of the survey area. Other species of commercial importance recorded in high numbers included pink shrimp (Pandalus spp.) and brown shrimp (Crangon crangon);
3.2.5. Bivalves of commercial interest in the area include mussels (Mytilus edulis) and
cockles (Cerastoderma edule); beds of both of these appear to be ephemeral in
nature within the region. Seed mussels are collected for sale and/or for deposition
in other areas, where they are later harvested. Consultation with the fishing
industry indicated a broad area of seed mussel fisheries off the Lincolnshire coast
from around Mablethorpe south to the mouth of the Wash, which is broadly similar
to that reported previously by HADA (2012). The Triton Knoll Electrical System study
area crosses the area of potential seed mussel beds. However, information
collected by the Eastern IFCA (Eastern IFCA, 2010) indicated that mussel fisheries
were much more limited in extent, and located outside of the Triton Knoll Electrical
System study area, approximately 5 km to the south. Further information on
principal fishing grounds for bivalves of commercial interest is outlined in the
Commercial Fisheries Technical Report (Annex 12.1).
3.3. Species of conservation importance
3.3.1. A number of species of conservation importance have been occasionally recorded in
the wider area (Greater Wash SEA area and/or Humber); predominantly in
inshore/estuarine waters. These include:
Allis shad Alosa alosa and twaite shad A. fallax; Appendix III of the Bern Convention, Annexes II and V of the EC Habitats Directive, UK BAP priority species;
River lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis and sea lamprey Peteromyzon marinus; Appendix III of the Bern Convention, Annex II of the EC Habitats Directive, UK BAP priority species;
European smelt Osmerus eperlanus; Annexes II and V of the EC Habitats Directive, UK BAP priority species;
Salmon Salmo salar and sea trout S. trutta; salmon is on Annex III of the Bern convention and freshwater populations on Annexes II and V of the EC Habitats Directive, both are UK BAP species; and
European eel Anguilla anguilla; critically endangered on the IUCN red list; UK BAP priority species.
June 2014 10 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
3.3.2. None of these species listed were recorded during either the TKOWF surveys or
during previous surveys of OWFs in the Greater Wash area. It is noted, however,
that the surveys were not designed to target these migratory species.
3.3.3. Species such as cod, plaice, herring, mackerel and sole (all of which were recorded
during the TKOWF, and Lynn, Inner Dowsing and Lincs surveys and which occur
commonly in the Greater wash region) are also listed under a commercial marine
fish group UK Species Action Plan.
3.4. Spawning and nursery areas
3.4.1. Many species of fish and shellfish are known to either spawn or have nursery areas
in relatively close proximity to, or potentially overlapping with the Triton Knoll
Electrical System site (Coull et al., 1998; Ellis et al., 2012; Rogers and Stocks, 2001;
see Figures 2 - 4).
3.4.2. The key species identified within the scoping phase were herring, cod, whiting,
sandeel, lemon sole, plaice and sole.
3.4.3. Detailed information on spawning and nursery areas for fish species was considered
in the TKOWF ES (NB herring are discussed separately below). These spawning and
nursery areas are based on the best, most recent available data (Ellis et al., 2012).
3.4.4. Spawning activity is summarised below (from Ellis et al., 2012):
There are no species with ‘high intensity’ spawning in the area of the proposed development;
The species reported to have spawning activity in the area are sandeel, sole, cod, sprat, whiting and lemon sole, whose spawning distributions extend for vast areas around the eastern and southern coast of the UK; the study area forms only a small percentage of these areas; and
Only sandeel and sole spawning grounds overlap the Triton Knoll Electrical System study area, with these grounds being of low intensity spawning.
3.4.5. The only commercially important demersal spawning fish species in the area, as
established through the consultation and scoping process, are sandeel and herring.
These species are considered further in Section 5.5 and 5.6 of this report.
3.4.6. For fish nursery grounds, the only two species with ‘high intensity’ grounds in the
study area are whiting and herring. Species with low intensity nursery areas that
cross the study area (as well as widely around the UK) comprise thornback ray, cod,
plaice, Dover sole and lemon sole.
June 2014 11 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
3.4.7. Shellfish spawning in the area includes shrimp and whelk (which spawn in winter),
and lobster and edible crab (summer). Data from TKOWF surveys showed that some
egg-bearing ‘berried’ lobster were present in the vicinity of the scoping boundary in
June (TKOWF ES Annex F1).
June 2014 12 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 2: Spawning and nursery grounds for herring, sprat, cod and whiting in the vicinity of the Triton Knoll Electrical System
June 2014 13 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 3: Spawning and nursery grounds for sandeel, sole, plaice and lemon sole in the vicinity of the Triton Knoll Electrical System
June 2014 14 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 4: Spawning and nursery grounds for anglerfish, spurdog, mackerel and thornback ray in the vicinity of the Triton Knoll Electrical System
The IHLS surveys consistently identified an area of very high herring spawning
activity well to the north of the TKOWF site, immediately north of Flamborough
Head. In 2008 the IHLS recorded a maximum of 1400 larvae m-2 (of <10 mm) at the
main Bank’s herring stock spawning grounds north of Flamborough Head, compared
to just one larva m-2 south of 54° North (graticule of latitude north of the proposed
development, south of Bridlington), below which the TKOWF site lies. Similarly in
2009, the IHLS recorded a maximum of 4000 larvae m-2 in the Flamborough Head
spawning ground compared with 137 larvae m-2 south of 54° North (50% of the
latter being >10 mm).
June 2014 15 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
3.5. Sandeel and herring spawning
3.5.1. The TKOWF site is located on the periphery of the Banks spawning grounds, one of
the four spawning components that make up the North Sea herring stock (alongside
Shetland/Orkney, Buchan and Downs spawning grounds). The main focus of the
Banks spawning ground is thought to lie to the north, off Flamborough Head. Low
intensity sandeel spawning takes places within the Triton Knoll Electrical System
study area, reportedly from November to February. Spawning areas for this species
off the east coast are large, extending from northern England to the English
Channel.
3.5.2. Information from Coull et al. (1998) indicate that the study area crosses herring
spawning grounds. These grounds are thought to be used in August-October (Coull
et al., 1998). However, the ES for TKOWF comprehensively reviewed herring
spawning in the area using recent data (ES Volume 3, Annex F). These site specific
herring larval surveys were conducted by TKOWFL in early October 2009 and 2010
to investigate the spawning activity in the TKOWF site and the surrounding area.
The results from the 2009 and 2010 site specific surveys suggest that the most
important and intensive spawning by the Bank’s herring stock occurs predominantly
well to the north of the TKOWF site. The data also strongly suggest that spawning is
not occurring in or close to the TKOWF site in any significant way. Furthermore,
investigation into the potential for spawning to the south of the TKOWF site was
also undertaken, through a review of the evidence generated by the Sheringham
Shoal OWF herring larvae surveys. Based on this review, it is considered that herring
do not spawn to the south of the TKOWF site in any significant quantities.
3.5.3.
3.6. Potential herring and sandeel spawning habitat
3.6.1. The Folk sediment classification (Folk, 1954) has been used to describe seabed
habitat as this is also the classification scheme used to underpin the British
June 2014 16 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Geological Survey’s (BGS’s) 1:250,000 scale seabed sediment maps. This sediment
classification has subsequently been used within the MAREA reports.
3.6.2. Using the Folk (1954) classification enables the screening of seabed areas forspatial
overlap with areas of seabed that have the potential to support herring or sandeel
spawning activity. This approach enables compatibility of herring and sandeel
potential spawning habitat environmental assessments with a range of products
(e.g. MAREAs, marine planning areas) and data sources (e.g. BGS 1:250,000 maps).
Further information on the seabed habitat classification in the study area is located
in Technical Annex 6.1 of the ES.
3.6.3. Suitable potential spawning habitat has been described in various peer review
papers, technical working group reports (ICES HAWG) and grey literature (Bowers,
1980; Rankine, 1986; Aneer, 1989; Morrison et al., 1991; Maravellias et al., 2000;
Maravellias, 2001; Mills et al., 2003; Skaret et al., 2003; Geffen, 2009; Payne, 2010;
ECA and RPS Energy, 2010a, 2010b, 2011). The review and analysis of the source
data for potential spawning habitat resulted in the development of the seabed
surficial sediment classification. The sediment classes used in the screening for
potential spawning habitat are as follows:
Preferred habitat sediment class – in the context of this methodology, these are sediment division/units which herring or sandeel favourably select as part of their spawning habitat requirements;
Marginal habitat sediment class – in the context of this methodology, these are the sediment division/units which herring or sandeel may select as part of their spawning habitat requirements. This sediment class has adequate sediment structure but is less favourable than preferred habitat; and
Unsuitable habitat sediment class – seabed sediment classes which have inadequate sediment structure to be chosen by herring or sandeel for spawning grounds.
3.6.4. Potential herring and sandeel habitat have been identified within the Humber
Region, based on sediment type, historic spawning areas and fishing fleet data (see
Reach et al., 2013 and Latto et al. 2013 for full methods for herring and sandeel,
respectively).
Potential herring spawning habitat
3.6.5. The results of the broad scale mapping process carried out as part of the Humber
Herring CIA (ERM, 2013 an Appendix to MarineSpace Ltd et al. 2013) based upon
BGS sediment data, as illustrated in Figure 5, show that the Triton Knoll Electrical
System study area overlaps with the preferred potential Atlantic herring spawning
habitat sediment class of sandy gravel and gravel and a small area of sediment class
June 2014 17 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
considered to be marginal potential habitat. Figure 5: also shows areas of unsuitable
habitat (shown in white), i.e. sediment classes not considered to be preferred or
marginal spawning habitat for Atlantic herring.
3.6.6. As part of the Humber Atlantic Herring CIA (ERM, 2013 an Appendix to MarineSpace
Ltd et al. 2013), and in line with the Herring EIA Working Group methodology
(MarineSpace Ltd et al., 2013, Appendix B) a range of data were used and mapped
to try to establish potential herring habitat presence. The focus of the spatial
mapping assessments was the analysis of multiple overlaps of data layers used in
the assessment methodology and the resultant ‘heat’. In effect the greater the
number of data layer overlaps, then the higher the ‘heat’ and the associated
confidence that the area of seabed mapped has the potential to provide herring
habitat. An assessment of the confidence in the data for indicating the presence of
herring spawning habitat was also carried out. Figure 6: presents the degree of
interaction between the Triton Knoll Electrical System study area and data
indicating very high, high, medium and low ’heat’ scores for the presence of
potential Atlantic herring habitat. The Triton Knoll Electrical System study area
predominately falls within the very low to medium heat score categories, with a
small area along the offshore cable route which falls within a high heat score
category.
June 2014 18 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 5: Atlantic herring preferred and marginal habitat types
June 2014 19 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 6: Atlantic herring heat map of habitat potential
June 2014 20 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Potential sandeel spawning habitat
3.6.7. The results of the broad scale mapping process carried out as part of the Humber
Sandeel CIA (ERM, 2013 an Appendix to MarineSpace Ltd et al. 2013) based upon
BGS sediment data, as illustrated in Figure 7, show that the Triton Knoll Electrical
System study area overlaps slightly with the preferred potential sandeel spawning
habitat sediment classes of gravelly sand, with the majority of the Triton Knoll
Electrical System overlapping with marginal habitat sediments of sandy gravel.
Figure 7 also shows areas of unsuitable habitat (shown in white), i.e. sediment
classes not considered to be preferred or marginal spawning habitat for sandeel.
3.6.8. As part of the Humber Sandeel CIA (ERM, 2013 an Appendix to MarineSpace et al.
2013), and in line with the Sandeel EIA Working Group methodology (MarineSpace
et al. 2013, Appendix B) a range of data were used and mapped to try to establish
likelihood of sandeel habitat presence. The focus of the spatial mapping
assessments was the analysis of multiple overlaps of data layers used in the
assessment methodology and the resultant ‘heat’. In effect the greater the number
of data layer overlaps, then the higher the ‘heat’ and the associated confidence that
the area of seabed mapped has the potential to support sandeels. An assessment of
the confidence in the data for indicating the presence of potential sandeel habitat
was also carried out. Figure 8 presents the degree of interaction between the Triton
Knoll Electrical System study area and data indicating very high, high, medium and
low ’heat’ scores for the presence of potential sandeel habitat. The Triton Knoll
Electrical System study area falls within the very low to low heat score category.
June 2014 21 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 7: Sandeel preferred and marginal habitat types
June 2014 22 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 8: Sandeel heat map of habitat potential
June 2014 23 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
3.7. TKOWF site-specific surveys
3.7.1. A site-specific geotechnical survey was undertaken in 2012 along the Triton Knoll
Electrical System cable route (Osiris, 2013). Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) and
vibrocores were subject to Particle Size Distribution (PSD) classification and the
main characteristics of the surficial seabed sediments were described in the Physical
Environment Baseline Assessment (Annex 6.1). The characteristics are summarised
below and in Figure 9:
The distribution of seabed sediments across the Nearshore and Midshore Areas of the export cable corridor is complex, with sands, gravels and clays present; and
The distribution of sediments across the Offshore Area of the export cable corridor is more homogenous with silty gravelly sand and gravelly sand dominating.
3.7.2. The site-specific geotechnical surveys indicate that the preferred habitat sediments
span a much reduced proportion of the cable corridor than the broad scale mapping
suggests. The difference between the two interpretations of the potential herring
habitat suitability could be due to the very low to medium confidence in the
Humber Atlantic herring CIA data.
3.7.3. In relation to sandeel spawning, the broad scale mapping established that the Triton
Knoll Electrical System study area overlaps with primarily marginal and unsuitable
habitat sediments, with very low to low confidence in the data for the Humber
sandeel CIA data. The site-specific geotechnical surveys confirm the presence of
marginal habitat sediments along the cable corridor.
June 2014 24 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 9: Sediment sediments across the study area
June 2014 25 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
4. Conclusions
4.1.1. The fish and shellfish communities present within the Triton Knoll Electrical System
study area, as summarised in this technical baseline report, are typical for the wider
southern North Sea region. The characterisation studies identified the potential for
spawning and nursery grounds for sandeel, herring, sole, cod, sprat, whiting and
lemon sole to be present in the vicinity of the Triton Knoll Electrical System study
area.
4.1.2. Broad scale mapping, based on sediment data, established that the Triton Knoll
Electrical System study area overlaps with preferred, marginal and unsuitable
potential Atlantic herring spawning habitat, although site-specific geotechnical
surveys indicate that the preferred habitat sediments span a much reduced
proportion of the cable corridor than the broad scale mapping suggests. The
difference between the two interpretations of the potential herring habitat
suitability could be due to the very low to medium confidence in the Humber
Atlantic herring CIA data.
4.1.3. In relation to sandeel spawning, the broad scale mapping established that the Triton
Knoll Electrical System study area overlaps with primarily marginal and unsuitable
habitat sediments, with very low to low confidence in the data for the Humber
sandeel CIA data. The site-specific geotechnical surveys confirm the presence of
marginal habitat sediments along the cable corridor.
June 2014 26 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
5. References
Aneer G., 1989. Herring (Clupea harengus L.) spawning and spawning ground
characteristics in the Baltic Sea. Fisheries Research, 8, 169–195.
Bowers A.B., 1980. Characteristics of herring (Clupea harengus) spawning grounds.
ICES CM 1980/H:13
Coull, K.A., Johnstone, R. and Rogers, S.I. (1998). Fisheries Sensitivity Maps in British
Waters. Published and Distributed by UKOOA Ltd, Aberdeen, 63 pp.
East Channel Association and RPS Energy (ECA and RPS), 2010a. East English
Channel Herring Spawning Potential Assessment. Volume 1, Issue 1 (Rev 1).
East Channel Association and RPS Energy (ECA and RPS), 2010b. East English
Channel Herring Spawning Potential Assessment (2009 Update). Volume 1, Issue 2
(Rev 1).
East Channel Association and RPS Energy (ECA and RPS), 2011. East English Channel
Herring Spawning Assessment. Volume 1, Issue 3.
Eastern IFCA, (2010). Annual Research Report 2010. 230 pp.
Ellis, J.R., Milligan, S.P., Readdy, L., Taylor, N. and Brown, M.J. (2012). Spawning and
nursery grounds of selected fish species in UK waters. Cefas Scientific Series
Technical Report 147. Available at:
http://www.cefas.defra.gov.uk/publications/techrep/TechRep147.pdf
Folk R.L. (1954). The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in
sedimentary rock nomenclature. Journal of Geology, 62 (4): pp. 344‐359.
Geffen A.J., 2009. Advances in herring biology: from simple to complex, coping with
plasticity and adaptability. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66, 1688‐1695.
Humber Aggregate Dredging Association (HADA) (2012). Marine Aggregate Regional
Environmental Assessment of the Humber and Outer Wash Region. Volume I:
Chapters 1-6. Issued May 2012.
Latto P. L., Reach I.S., Alexander D., Armstrong S., Backstrom J., Beagley E., Murphy
K., Piper R. and Seiderer L.J. (2013). Screening Spatial Interactions between Marine
Aggregate Application Areas and Sandeel Habitat. A Method Statement produced
for the British Marine Aggregates Producers Association.
June 2014 27 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
MarineSpace Ltd, ABPmer Ltd, ERM Ltd, Fugro EMU Ltd and Marine Ecological
Surveys Ltd (2013). Environmental Effect Pathways between Marine Aggregate
Application Areas and Atlantic Herring Potential Spawning Habitat: Regional
Cumulative Impact Assessments. Version 1.0. A report for the British Marine
Aggregates Producers Association.
Maravelias C.D., Reid D.G., and Swartzman G., 2000. Seabed substrate, water depth
and zooplankton as determinants of the prespawning spatial aggregation of North
Atlantic herring. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 195, 249–259.
Maravelias C.D., 2001. Habitat associations of Atlantic herring in the Shetland area:
influence of spatial scale and geographic segmentation. Fisheries Oceanography, 10,
259–267.
MarineSpace Ltd, ABPmer Ltd, ERM Ltd, Fugro EMU Ltd and Marine Ecological
Surveys Ltd (2013). Environmental Effect Pathways between Marine Aggregate
Application Areas and Sandeel Habitat: Regional Cumulative Impact Assessments.
Version 1.0. A report for the British Marine Aggregates Producers Association.
Mills C., Eastwood P.D. and Rogers S.I., 2003. Herring spawning grounds in the
eastern English Channel. CEFAS (FB‐ECOS) Working Paper – Herring Spawning
Grounds in the Eastern English Channel. Pp 9.
Morrison J.A., Napier I.R., and Gamble J.C., 1991. Mass mortality of herring eggs
associated with a sedimentary diatom bloom. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 48,
237‐245.
Payne M.R., 2010. Mind the gaps: a state‐space model for analysing the dynamics of
North Sea herring spawning components. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67, 1939–
1947.
The Planning Inspectorate (PINS) (2014). Scoping Opinion: Proposed Triton Knoll
Electrical System. Issued May 2014.
Rankine P.W., 1986. Herring spawning grounds around the Scottish coast. ICES CM
1986/H:15
Reach I.S., Latto P., Alexander D., Armstrong S., Backstrom J., Beagley E., Murphy K.,
Piper R. And Seiderer L.J. (2013). Screening Spatial Interactions between Marine
Aggregate Application Areas and Atlantic Herring Potential Spawning Areas. A
Method Statement produced for the British Marine Aggregates Producers
Association.
June 2014 28 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Rogers, S. and Stocks, R. (2001). Strategic Environmental Assessment - SEA2
Technical Report 003 - Fish and Fisheries.
Rogers, S.I., Millner, R.S., and Mead, T.A. (1998). The distribution and abundance of
young fish on the east and south coast of England (1981 to 1997). Cefas Science
Series Technical Report Number 108.
Rohlf, N. and Groger, J. (2009) Report of the Herring Larvae Surveys in the North Sea
in 2008/2009. Working Draft. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea,
WD HAWG 2009, 11pp
Skaret G., Nottestad L., Ferno A., Johannessen A. and Axelsen B.E., 2003. Spawning
of herring: day or night, today or tomorrow? Aquatic Living Resources, 16, 299‐306.
Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited (TKOWFL) (2014). Triton Knoll Offshore
Wind Farm Electrical System Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report.
Submitted March 2014.
HERRING AND
SANDEEL
SPAWNING
APPENDIX A FISH AND SHELLFISH ECOLOGY
TECHNICAL BASELINE REPORT
JULY 2014 TRITON KNOLL ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT
Client
Client approval Date
GoBe Consultants Ltd
Prepared by Dr Lauren Kirkland Date 21/07/14
Authorised by Sean Leake Date 22/07/14
Signed
July 2014 1 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
CONTENTS
1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3
1.1. Purpose of Appendix ................................................................................................ 3
2. Herring larval surveys ....................................................................................................... 3
2.1. International Herring Larval Survey (IHLS) ............................................................... 3
2.2. Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm herring larvae survey .......................................... 7
2.3. Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 8
3. Potential herring and sandeel spawning habitat ............................................................. 8
3.1. Datasets used in the assessment ............................................................................. 8
3.2. Caveats and limitations of the data used ................................................................ 9
3.3. Interpretation of preferred habitat and confidence heat maps ............................ 10
3.4. Comparison of site specific geophysical surveys and the CIA preferred habitats
maps 11
4. References ..................................................................................................................... 16
July 2014 2 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: North Sea herring - Abundance of larvae <10 mm (n/m2) in the Orkney/Shetland,
Buchan and Central North Sea area (16 – 30 September 2013, maximum = 12,800 n/m2)
(Source: ICES HAWG Report, 2014). ....................................................................................... 4
Figure 2: Peak abundance of North Sea herring larvae in the central North Sea subarea
from 2007 – 2012 (Source: IHLS, 2014) ................................................................................... 6
Figure 3: Regional sediment and seabed type along the offshore export cable corridor .. 13
Figure 4: Comparison of site-specific geophysical survey data and the CIA preferred
herring spawning habitat data .............................................................................................. 14
Figure 5: Comparison of site-specific geophysical survey data and the CIA preferred
sandeel spawning habitat data ............................................................................................. 15
July 2014 3 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
1. Introduction
1.1. Purpose of Appendix
1.1.1. The purpose of this appendix is to provide additional information to supplement the
detail provided in the Fish and Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
pertaining to herring and sandeel spawning. This addendum relates specifically to
the comments received from the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) and
their scientific advisers (CEFAS), and Natural England (NE) regarding International
Herring Larvae Surveys (IHLS) and potential herring and sandeel spawning habitat.
2. Herring larval surveys
2.1. International Herring Larval Survey (IHLS)
2.1.1. The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) programme of herring
larval surveys in the North Sea and adjacent areas has been in operation since 1967.
The main purpose of this programme is to provide quantitative estimates of herring
larval abundance, which are used as a relative index of changes of the herring
spawning‐stock biomass in the assessment.
2.1.2. The total area covered by the IHLS surveys is divided into subareas corresponding to
the main spawning groups. Sampling in each subarea is timed to coincide with the
historical peak hatching periods. The subarea of relevance to the Triton Knoll
Electrical System is the central North Sea (CNS) subarea, where IHLS surveys are
undertaken annually to coincide with the peak hatching period between 1st
September and 30th October.
2.1.3. The ICES Herring Assessment Working Group (HAWG) 2014 (ICES, 2014) report
presents herring larvae data collected during surveys in September 2013. The report
states that the estimate for the CNS area was very small in 2012, but has increased
considerably in 2013. Figure 1 shows the abundance of herring larvae in the CNS
subarea, using the most recent IHLS data from the surveys undertaken in
September 2013. The survey data clearly shows the ‘core’ spawning grounds at
Flamborough Head in the CNS area.
July 2014 4 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 1: North Sea herring - Abundance of larvae <10 mm (n/m2) in the Orkney/Shetland, Buchan and Central North Sea area (16 – 30 September 2013, maximum = 12,800 n/m2) (Source: ICES HAWG Report, 2014).
July 2014 5 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
2.1.4. The most southerly annual IHLS sampling stations for the CNS region occur within
10 km of the Triton Knoll development site, although it should be noted that the
IHLS sampling south of 54°N (where the Triton Knoll site is located) varies from year
to year. The IHLS sampling strategy prioritises areas which are presumed to have
higher densities of larvae over areas which are likely to have lower densities (ICES,
2008) and the reduced sampling effort south of 54°N (Figure 1) suggests that this
area is historically less important for the CNS herring stock.
2.1.5. Figure 2 shows the results of annual IHLS surveys for the CNS over a six year period
from 2007 – 2012. These data show that there is year to year geographic variation
in the main herring spawning area in this part of the North Sea but also confirms
that spawning over this period has been primarily focussed to the north of
Flamborough Head. In years within which the larval density is at a peak within these
years there appears to be an expansion of the spatial distribution of herring larvae
whereas there is an apparent contraction within years where the core larval stock is
comparatively low. These data suggest that the most significant herring spawning
does not usually occur south of Flamborough Head. It is noted that the IHLS
sampling south of 54°N (closer to the TKOWF site) varies from year to year and it is
therefore possible that some degree of sampling bias may account for this trend.
2.1.6. The higher abundances recorded in the vicinity of the TKOWF site during the 2009-
2011 IHLS surveys are likely to represent a southerly extension of the periphery of
the Flamborough Head spawning area, with the core of the spawning area
remaining to the north and east of Flamborough Head. This geographic variability in
spawning activity is typical for herring, a species whose spawning behaviour
(including spawning location) is known to be modulated by environmental variables,
such as sea surface temperature (Maravelias, 2001).
2.1.7. The apparent temporal trend within the 2007-2013 survey IHLS data sets is that the
limited spawning activity recorded somewhat further south (in the vicinity of the
TKOWF site) is representative of a peak year expansion of larval density and that
the Greater Wash region is more likely to represent the periphery of the main
Flamborough Head spawning area recorded during IHLS surveys. It is noted that
IHLS surveys are not conducted extensively to the south however and therefore,
due to historic records of herring spawning within the region, consideration is given
to site specific surveys and potential spawning habitat.
July 2014 6 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 2: Peak abundance of North Sea herring larvae in the central North Sea subarea from 2007 – 2012 (Source: IHLS, 2014)
July 2014 7 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
2.2. Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm herring larvae survey
2.2.1. To inform the assessment of the potential impacts on herring spawning and the
proposed Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm (TKOWF) development, site-specific
herring larvae surveys were conducted in 2009 and 2010 to determine whether or
not herring spawning grounds (as represented by the high abundances of small
herring larvae) were present within and in the vicinity of the TKOWF site and to put
the site into the wider context of the Flamborough Head spawning grounds through
comparison to the long time series IHLS data sets. The results of these surveys were
used to inform the characterisation of herring spawning grounds for the purposes of
the TKOWF Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (TKOWFL, 2011).
2.2.2. The sampling technique used was the same as that used by the IHLS (using a Gulf
high-speed plankton sampler), although at a sampling density greater than that
used for the IHLS. Both of the site-specific surveys were conducted during the first
two weeks of October to coincide with the main spawning period for herring in this
region of the North Sea. The IHLS in 2009 and 2010 were undertaken in the last two
weeks of September, reflecting the slightly earlier spawning period to the north of
Triton Knoll.
2.2.3. The site-specific surveys showed that, although herring larvae were recorded within
the survey area, the abundances were considerably lower than the abundances
usually recorded at the Flamborough Head spawning grounds. At one site
approximately 10 km to the north of Triton Knoll, there was evidence of some
limited spawning (i.e. higher abundances of small larvae, >10 mm) during the 2010
survey, though this was considered to have been at the periphery of the main
Flamborough Head spawning grounds. The larvae recorded during the site-specific
surveys were lacking any yolk sacs, indicating that they were more than 10 days old
and therefore would have drifted to the survey area from spawning grounds further
afield during that period.
2.2.4. The results of the IHLS (from 2001/02 to 2010/11 surveys) clearly showed
consistently high herring larval abundances (thousands of larvae <10 mm m-2)
recorded off the coast of Flamborough Head and further north (over 80 km to the
north of the development site). The TKOWF Environmental Statement (ES)
concluded that the site-specific herring larvae surveys were single event surveys
and therefore spatial and temporal variation in environmental variables and year to
year location of herring spawning grounds mean that it is important to interpret the
data in the context of other background information and data sources. In this case,
when considered in combination with the broadscale, long time series data of the
IHLS, the TKOWF ES concluded that the results provided a strong indication that the
July 2014 8 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
TKOWF area was not close to any of the significant or consistently used spawning
grounds for herring in the region.
2.2.5. It is important to note that the herring survey results presented in the Triton Knoll
Environmental Statement give a “snap shot” description of the distribution and
abundance of herring spawning in the area. The surveys do not cover the whole
spawning period for the whole area and therefore cannot define the spatial and
temporal distribution of spawning herring.
2.2.6. The combining of the site-specific survey data with IHLS data has some limitations
and the comparability due to sampling season is a potential area of uncertainty
within the dataset. The data are considered to be representative of larval density
within the area and complementary to that of the IHLS.
2.3. Conclusions
2.3.1. Spawning grounds in the North Sea have been regularly sampled during the IHLS,
conducted by ICES, since the 1970s and one spawning ground immediately north of
Flamborough Head (approximately 80 km northeast of the development site) has
been shown to be a regular, reliable (though with some natural annual variability)
spawning ground for herring. Althoughs the periphery of the Flamborough Head
spawning grounds occasionally extends south of 54°N, no further spawning grounds
have been consistently identified south of Flamborough Head (54°N) during the
IHLS.
2.3.2. In addition to the larval surveys conducted by IHLS and TKOWF, a regional
description of the sediment type allows for consideration of the potential spawning
habitat present within the Triton Knoll Electrical System study area. The following
sections describe the potential spawning habitat.
3. Potential herring and sandeel spawning habitat
3.1. Datasets used in the assessment
3.1.1. Further to the methodology outlined in the Fish and Shellfish Technical Baseline
Report (Section 3.6) in relation to the broad scale mapping process as carried out as
part of the Humber Herring and Sandeel Cumulative Impact Assessments (CIA)
(ERM, 2013 an Appendix to MarineSpace Ltd et al. 2013), the following spatial
datasets were considered in the confidence assessment to inform the location of
potential spawning grounds for herring and sandeel:
Seabed sediment Folk classification: British Geological Survey (BGS);
July 2014 9 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Seabed sediment Folk classification: Marine Aggregate Regional Environmental Assessment (MAREA);
Seabed sediment Folk classification: Regional Environmental Characterisations (RECs);
Fishing Fleet: Vessel Monitoring System (VMS);
Fishing Grounds: Eastern Sea Fisheries Joint Committee (ESFJC);
Spawning Grounds: Coull et al. (1998); and
Spawning Grounds (Herring only): International Herring Larvae Surveys (IHLS).
3.2. Caveats and limitations of the data used
3.2.1. The data used in the broad scale mapping process carried out as part of the Humber
Herring and Sandeel Cumulative Impact Assessments (CIA) (ERM, 2013 an Appendix
to MarineSpace Ltd et al. 2013), has to be considered alongside the following caveat
statements:
The International Herring Larval survey (IHLS) was greater in extent and duration in the past. Now, due to sharp reduction in ship time and number of participating nations, the survey now only samples peak spawning locations and at around the peak spawning. While the Downs component is surveyed three times (covering the whole hatching period), all others areas are in general covered only once a year, and most often during the same time period, hence peaks timings can be missed. This pattern is persistent for most of the last 20 years. It is obvious that these gaps must result in larger levels of uncertainty when calculating larvae abundance indices for the North Sea (ICES 2012). It is important to note that in areas where the IHLS survey was not undertaken is not indicative of no spawning;
Herring larvae remain close to the seabed during the yolk-sac phase. The IHLS only samples down to 5 m above the seabed, and for this reason, yolk-sac and smaller larvae are not sampled effectively, as the towed plankton samplers used for the surveys are not deployed close enough to the seabed;
For the purposes of the CIA assessment, preferred habitat for both herring and sandeel is based on substrate classification alone. It must be noted that there are other factors, i.e. for herring: raised seabed features, good oxygenation plus other factors, are involved in establishing a ground as suitable for spawning. As a consequence not all areas described as preferred habitat will be suitable for spawning;
It is also important to note that some historic herring spawning grounds which currently have very little or no spawning activity can be re-colonised (subsequent seabed recovery from impacts and ability to support spawning activity over time) (ICES, 2012);
Heat maps generated from overall data confidences are not necessarily indicative of spawning areas. Higher confidence levels indicate that more layers of data are available for that area and do not relay any information
July 2014 10 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
about data contents. Hence should not be assumed to be directly related to spawning activity.
It is acknowledged that the methodology in the CIA report (ERM, 2013 an Appendix to MarineSpace Ltd et al. 2013) will be subject to periodic review, and subsequent revised versions may be released as the scientific understanding of Atlantic Herring spawning habitat preferences advances, and/or when new data become available.
Vessel monitoring systems are used in commercial fishing to allow fisheries regulatory organizations to monitor the position, time at a position, and course and speed of fishing vessels. From January 2005 all UK fishing vessels over 15 metres in overall length were required to have installed on board a satellite tracking device. Since January 2012 vessels greater than or equal to 12 m have a requirement to install these systems.
3.3. Interpretation of preferred habitat and confidence heat maps
3.3.1. The results of the broad scale mapping process carried out as part of the Humber
Sandeel CIA (ERM, 2013 an Appendix to MarineSpace Ltd et al. 2013) based upon
BGS sediment data, as illustrated in Figure 5 and 7 of the Fish and Shellfish
Technical Baseline Report (for herring and sandeel, respectively), show the overlap
of the Triton Knoll Electrical System study area with preferred and marginal
potential spawning habitat. Areas of the seabed shown in white represent either
seabed sediment classes which have inadequate structure to be chosen by herring
or sandeel for spawning grounds, or areas where sediment data is not available.
3.3.2. The heat map approach (as shown in Figures 6 and 8 of the Fish and Shellfish
Technical Baseline Report, for herring and sandeel, respectively) adopted in terms
of confidence levels indicates varying degrees of likelihood that an area will be
suitable for spawning or will contain spawning beds.
3.3.3. These heat maps, generated from overall confidences, are not necessarily indicative
of spawning areas; rather, higher confidences indicate that more layers of data
were available for that particular area (irrespective of data content). It should not
be assumed to be directly related to spawning activity. The data outlined in Section
3.1 of this document have been used to create the herring and sandeel heat maps,
as shown in Figures 6 and 8 of the Fish and Shellfish Technical Baseline Report, for
herring and sandeel, respectively.
3.3.4. The confidence ‘heat’ map for Atlantic herring potential spawning habitat (Figure 6
of the Fish and Shellfish Technical Baseline Report) shows that the regions of
highest confidence are those areas of seabed where IHLS data positively identify
Atlantic herring spawning. This is most notable in the northern part of the region,
inshore along the Holderness coast. Analysis of the TKOWF Atlantic herring larvae
July 2014 11 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
survey data (TKOWFL, 2011) extends the coverage of IHLS data across the Humber
region and provides confidence that the extent of the data reflects actual
distribution of larvae, mitigating a lack of ICES IHLS sampling south of Spurn Point
(ICES, 2012) i.e. the extent of the larvae is not limited by ICES IHLS data gaps.
3.3.5. The confidence ‘heat’ map for sandeel herring potential spawning habitat (Figure 8
of the Fish and Shellfish Technical Baseline Report) shows that the regions of
highest confidence are those areas of seabed where the preferable habitat
sediments overlaps with the Coull et al. (1998) sandeel spawning layer. This is most
notable in the northern part of the region, and across the Dogger Bank. A smaller
region of high confidence is associated with the Silver Pit, a bathymetric low (tunnel
valley) in the centre of the MAREA area.
3.4. Comparison of site specific geophysical surveys and the CIA preferred habitats
maps
3.4.1. Figure 3 illustrates the interpreted geophysical survey data (Gardline, 2010 and
Osiris, 2012) across the export cable corridor and wider array area. It also illustrates
the point data collected during a number of surveys that has been used to
characterise the REC and MAREA regions. The site specific TKOWF sediment data
formed part of the MAREA characterisation and has been developed further within
the figure through the illustration of the vibrocore survey data. The combination of
site specific survey sediment data and geophysical survey data give a high
confidence in the characterisation of seabed sediment conditions and therefore in
the characterisation of herring and sandeel potential spawning habitat within the
cable area.
3.4.2. Further to the figures presented in Section 3.6 and 3.7 of the Fish and Shellfish
Technical Baseline Report, Figures 4 and 5 below show a direct comparison
between the characterisation of the seabed sediments from the site-specific
geotechnical surveys along the Triton Knoll Electrical System cable route, and the
interpretation of the preferred spawning habitat maps that were incorporated into
the broad scale mapping process carried out as part of the Humber Sandeel CIA
(ERM, 2013 an Appendix to MarineSpace Ltd et al. 2013) based upon BGS sediment
data.
3.4.3. In relation to potential herring spawning habitat, Figure 4 indicates areas of
preferred herring habitat sediments (sandy gravel) along parts of the Triton Knoll
Electrical System cable route in both the geophysical surveys and the corresponding
BGS sediment data, although it was found to a lesser extent in the site-specific
geotechnical surveys. The BGS data highlights an area of marginal herring habitat
July 2014 12 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
sediments along a section of the cable route landward of the fan area. This area of
marginal sediments was not found in the site-specific geophysical surveys.
3.4.4. In relation to potential sandeel spawning habitat, Figure 5 indicates similar areas of
marginal sandeel habitat sediments along the central section of the Triton Knoll
Electrical System cable route, from both the site-specific geophysical surveys and
from the BGS data. Preferred sandeel habitat sediments are shown in the results
from both the site-specific and BGS data, although these sediments do not fall in
corresponding areas along the cable route.
July 2014 13 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 3: Regional sediment and seabed type along the offshore export cable corridor
July 2014 14 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 4: Comparison of site-specific geophysical survey data and the CIA preferred herring spawning habitat data
July 2014 15 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 5: Comparison of site-specific geophysical survey data and the CIA preferred sandeel spawning habitat data
July 2014 16 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
4. References
Coull, K.A., Johnstone, R. and Rogers, S.I. (1998). Fisheries Sensitivity Maps in British
Waters. Published and Distributed by UKOOA Ltd, Aberdeen, 63 pp.
ICES (2008) Manual for the International Herring Larvae Surveys South of 62' North.
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Annex 7: Working Documents
to PGHERS, 27pp.
ICES (2012). Report of the Herring Assessment Working Group for the Area South of
62ºN (HAWG), 13-22 March 2012, ICES HQ, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM
2012/ACOM:06. 835 pp.
ICES (2014). Report of the Herring Assessment Working Group for the Area South of
62ºN (HAWG), 11-20 March 2014, ICES HQ, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM
2014/ACOM:06. 1257 pp.
Maravelias C.D., 2001. Habitat associations of Atlantic herring in the Shetland area:
influence of spatial scale and geographic segmentation. Fisheries Oceanography, 10,
259–267.
MarineSpace Ltd, ABPmer Ltd, ERM Ltd, Fugro EMU Ltd and Marine Ecological
Surveys Ltd (2013). Environmental Effect Pathways between Marine Aggregate
Application Areas and Atlantic Herring Potential Spawning Habitat: Regional
Cumulative Impact Assessments. Version 1.0. A report for the British Marine
Aggregates Producers Association.
MarineSpace Ltd, ABPmer Ltd, ERM Ltd, Fugro EMU Ltd and Marine Ecological
Surveys Ltd (2013). Environmental Effect Pathways between Marine Aggregate
Application Areas and Sandeel Habitat: Regional Cumulative Impact Assessments.
Version 1.0. A report for the British Marine Aggregates Producers Association.
Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited (2011). Environmental Statement Volume
3 (Annex F). F1: Herring Larvae Survey Report.
SHELLFISH
APPENDIX B FISH AND SHELLFISH ECOLOGY
TECHNICAL BASELINE REPORT
JULY 2014 TRITON KNOLL ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT
Client
Client approval Date
GoBe Consultants Ltd
Prepared by Dr Lauren Kirkland Date 21/07/14
Authorised by Sean Leake Date 22/07/14
Signed
July 2014 1 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
CONTENTS
1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3
1.1. Purpose of Addendum ............................................................................................. 3
2. Brown Shrimp................................................................................................................... 3
2.1. Offshore wind farm surveys ..................................................................................... 3
2.2. Triton Knoll Electrical System Commercial Fisheries Technical Baseline Report ..... 3
3. Brown crab and lobster .................................................................................................... 7
3.1. Offshore wind farm surveys ..................................................................................... 7
3.2. Triton Knoll Electrical System Commercial Fisheries Technical Baseline Report ..... 7
4. References ..................................................................................................................... 11
July 2014 2 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Surveillance Sightings of UK Vessels in the Regional Study Area (All Fishing
Methods, 2008 to 2012) (Source: MMO, 2013 & BMM, 2014) ............................................... 5
Figure 2: Beam trawling fishing grounds (brown and pink shrimp) for UK registered fishing
vessels (Source: EIFCA, 2012 & PMSL, 2014) ........................................................................... 6
Figure 3: Key shellfish (potting) fishing grounds for the Bridlington fleet (Source: Holderness
Fishing Industry Group, 2013) .................................................................................................. 9
Figure 4: Key shellfish (potting) fishing grounds for the Lincolnshire and North Norfolk
based fleets (Source: Consultation, 2014) ............................................................................. 10
July 2014 3 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
1. Introduction
1.1. Purpose of Appendix
1.1.1. The purpose of this appendix is to provide additional information to supplement the
detail provided in the Fish and Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report (Annex
5.1) pertaining to shellfish. Specifically the addendum address comments received
from the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) their scientific advisers CEFAS,
and Natural England (NE) regarding the distribution of brown shrimp (Crangon
crangon), brown crab (Cancer pagurus) and lobster (Homarus gammarus).
2. Brown Shrimp
2.1. Offshore wind farm surveys
2.1.1. The Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm surveys (TKOWFL, 2011) recorded high
numbers of the commercially important pink shrimp (Pandalus spp.) and brown
shrimp (Crangon crangon). The surveys recorded the highest abundances of brown
shrimp generally to the south of the TWOWF site, associated with the more sandy
substrates in this area, in line with the habitat preferences for the species. This is
also in line with the findings reported in the Environmental Statement for the Race
Bank offshore wind farm, located to the south of Triton Knoll, which also recorded
high abundances of brown shrimp in this area (Centrica Energy, 2009).
2.1.2. Surveys commissioned for the Lynn, Inner Dowsing and Lincs offshore wind farms
for commercially important shrimp were conducted between November 2004 and
March 2005. The surveys concluded that pink shrimp was the dominant shrimp
species, and was widely recorded across the survey area excepting a single station
very close inshore (just to the north of Skegness). At this station, brown shrimp
overwhelmingly dominated. Pink shrimp catches peaked in December and February,
with brown shrimp catches peaking in early December (AMEC, 2007).
2.2. Triton Knoll Electrical System Commercial Fisheries Technical Baseline Report
The Triton Knoll Electrical System Commercial Fisheries Technical Baseline Report
(Annex 12.1) highlights the importance of the brown shrimp fishery in the Wash
area, stating that brown shrimp is the “mainstay of the fishery at present”.
2.2.1. The key fishing grounds identified in the vicinity of the Triton Knoll Electrical System
are shown in Figure 1 (regional surveillance data) and Figure 2, compiled using data
derived from consultation with local fishermen in 2012 (Boston and Kings Lynn) and
July 2014 4 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
updated during consultation in 2014 (Kings Lynn). The key fishing grounds are also
overlaid on extents of the brown and pink shrimp fishery provided by the EIFCA.
2.2.2. The data combined from the EIFCA and consultation with local fishermen, as shown
in Figure 2, highlight the importance of the coastal margins to brown shrimp and, as
a consequence, beam trawling activity within the region.
2.2.3. Further detail on the commercial fishing of brown shrimp in the vicinity of the
Triton Knoll Electrical System can be found in the Triton Knoll Electrical System
Commercial Fisheries Technical Baseline Report (Annex 8.1; Application Document
6.2.4.8.1).
July 2014 5 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 1 Surveillance Sightings of UK Vessels in the Regional Study Area (All Fishing Methods, 2008 to 2012) (Source: MMO, 2013 & BMM, 2014)
July 2014 6 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 2: Beam trawling fishing grounds (brown and pink shrimp) for UK registered fishing vessels (Source: EIFCA, 2012 & PMSL, 2014)
July 2014 7 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
3. Brown crab and lobster
3.1. Offshore wind farm surveys
3.1.1. The TKOWF surveys (TKOWFL, 2011) found common lobster and brown crab, with
lobster particularly associated with the coarser, gravelly sediments within the
TKOWF array area. Brown crab were recorded throughout the area, on all
substrates, although the highest abundances of individuals were found to be
associated with gravelly substrates with greatest abundance to the west of the
TKOWF array area. The shallow, sandy inshore area tended to be dominated by
juveniles of this species.
3.1.2. The majority of the individuals recorded in the TKOWF survey area were male.
Previous tagging studies (Jessop et al., 2007, MAFF, 1966) and recent larval studies
(Eaton et al., 2003) showed that mature females make significant northward
migrations along the Yorkshire coast to spawn while males are relatively sedentary,
seldom displaying significant migrations. The sex data from the TKOWF survey may
reflect this pattern, with males permanently resident in this region and females
potentially migrating further offshore to spawn. However, the results may also be
an artefact of the fact that berried females bury themselves and do not feed in the
period around October and November. They are therefore unlikely to enter baited
pots (Jessop et al., 2007) and this may have been reflected in the TKOWF survey
data.
3.1.3. Potting surveys from crab and lobster were undertaken for the Lynn, Inner Dowsing
and Lincs offshore wind farms between November 2004 and March 2005. Catches
in the surveys were dominated by brown crab with peak catches in December, with
lobster catches peaking in August.
3.2. Triton Knoll Electrical System Commercial Fisheries Technical Baseline Report
3.2.1. The Triton Knoll Electrical System Commercial Fisheries Technical Baseline Report
(Annex 12.1) in reporting the results of detailed site specific consultation
demonstrates that within the inshore area of the Triton Knoll Electrical System, the
principal fishing method is potting for a range of shellfish species, mainly brown
crab, velvet crab and lobster.
3.2.2. ICES rectangle 36F0, directly north of the export cable corridor, records the highest
landings values for the crab and lobster fishery in the UK, with lobster being the
highest value species caught, followed by edible crab. The potting fleet targeting
the Triton Knoll Electrical System study area primarily originate from Bridlington,
Lincolnshire and North Norfolk.
July 2014 8 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
3.2.3. The principal shellfish fishing grounds for the Bridlington fleet are given in Figure 3
and show that the key grounds encompass a considerable part of the offshore
turbine array. This is expected as the Bridlington fleet fishing into the Wash consist
of vessels greater than 12m in length and as a consequence they have a greater
capacity to fish for longer periods and in a range of weathers not suitable for
smaller ‘day’ boats.
3.2.4. The main shellfish fishing grounds utilised by the Lincolnshire and North Norfolk
fleets are given in Figure 3 and show key grounds such as the Inner Dowsing, Race
Bank and Docking Shoal, the North Norfolk coastal margins, the western part of the
offshore turbine array and the Lynn Deeps area of the deep water channel.
3.2.5. Further detail on the commercial fishing of brown crab and lobster in the vicinity of
the Triton Knoll Electrical System can be found in the Triton Knoll Electrical System
Commercial Fisheries Technical Baseline Report (Annex 12.1).
July 2014 9 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 3: Key shellfish (potting) fishing grounds for the Bridlington fleet (Source: Holderness Fishing Industry Group, 2013)
July 2014 10 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
Figure 4: Key shellfish (potting) fishing grounds for the Lincolnshire and North Norfolk based fleets (Source: Consultation, 2014)
July 2014 11 Fish & Shellfish Ecology Technical Baseline Report
4. References
AMEC (2007). Lynn Offshore Wind Farm. Environmental Statement.
Centrica Energy (2009). Race Bank Offshore Wind Farm. Environmental Statement.
Eaton, D.R., Brown, J., Addison, J.T., Milligan, S.P. and Fernand, L.J. (2003). Edible
Crab (Cancer pagurus) Larvae Surveys off the East Coast of England: Implications for
Stock Structure. Fisheries Research 65:191-199.
Jessop, R.W., Woo, J.R. & Torrice, L. (2007). Eastern Sea Fisheries Joint Committee
Research Report. Eastern Sea Fisheries Joint Committee, 259pp.
MAFF (1966). The Norfolk Crab Fishery. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food,
Laboratory Leaflet No. 12, 27pp.
Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited (2011). Environmental Statement Volume
3 (Annex F). F2: Shellfish Potting Surveys (May 2011).