Upload
anjolie-briggs
View
23
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
תכנון ובעיות "קשות". בינה מלאכותית אבי רוזנפלד. יש בעיות שכנראה המחשב לא יכול לפתור. NP-Complete. P. NP. איך פותרים את הבעיה???. אין פתרון פולינומיאלי ! צריכים לבדוק כל אפשרות! BRUTE FORCE = n! תכנות דינאמי– "רק" n 2 2 n כנראה שאין פתרון "סביר" - פולינומיאלי. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
"תכנון ובעיות "קשות
מלאכותית בינהרוזנפלד אבי
המחשב לא שכנראהיש בעיות יכול לפתור
PNP
NP-Complete
???איך פותרים את הבעיה
אין פתרון פולינומיאלי!•צריכים לבדוק כל אפשרות!••BRUTE FORCE = n!n22nתכנות דינאמי– "רק" •
כנראה שאין פתרון "סביר" - פולינומיאלי•
NP-Complete דוגמאות
•To prove a problem is NP-Complete show a polynomial time reduction from 3-SAT
•Other NP-Complete Problems:–PARTITION–SUBSET-SUM–CLIQUE–HAMILTONIAN PATH (TSP)–GRAPH COLORING–MINESWEEPER (and many more)
רוב בעיות של תכנון ואופטימיזציה !הם פה
NPרק הבעיות המעניות הם
• Deterministic Polynomial Time: The TM takes at most O(nc) steps to accept a string of length n
• Non-deterministic Polynomial Time: The TM takes at most O(nc) steps on each computation path to accept a string of length n
?אז מה עושים
•Branch and Bound כעין( PRUNING)•HILLCLIMING•HEURISTICS•Mixed Integer Programming
• Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP)• Constraint Optimization Problems (COP)• Backtracking search for CSP and COPs• Problem Structure and Problem
Decomposition• Local search for COPs
10
COP וCSPדוגמאות
• Variables WA, NT, Q, NSW, V, SA, T • Domains Di = {red, green, blue}• Constraints: adjacent regions must have different colors
e.g., WA ≠ NT (if the language allows stating this so succinctly), or(WA, NT) in {(red,green), (red,blue), (green,red), (green,blue), (blue,red), (blue,green)}
•11
Example: Map-Coloring
This is a solution: complete and consistent assignments (i.e., all variables assigned, all constraints satisfied):e.g., WA = red, NT = green, Q = red, NSW = green, V = red, SA = blue, T = green•
12
Example: Map-Coloring
• Binary CSP: each constraint relates two variables• Constraint graph: nodes are variables, arcs show constraints
13
Constraint graph
General-purpose CSP algorithms use the graph structure to speed up search, e.g., Tasmania is an independent subproblem
• Discrete variables– finite domains:
• n variables, domain size d implies O(dn) complete assignments• e.g., Boolean CSPs, including Boolean satisfiability (NP-complete)
– infinite domains:• integers, strings, etc.• e.g., job scheduling, variables are start/end days for each job• need a constraint language, e.g., StartJob1 + 5 ≤ StartJob3
• Continuous variables– e.g., start/end times for Hubble Space Telescope observations– linear constraints solvable in polynomial time by linear
programming methods
14
Varieties of CSPs
• Assignment problems– e.g., who teaches what class?
• Timetabling problems– e.g., which class (or exam) is offered when and where?
• Hardware Configuration• Spreadsheets• Transportation scheduling• Factory scheduling• Floorplanning
Notice that many real-world problems involve real-valued variables•
15
Real-world CSPs
Let’s start with the straightforward (dumb) approach, then fix it.States are defined by the values assigned so far.• Initial state: the empty assignment { }• Successor function: assign a value to an unassigned variable that
does not conflict with current assignment• fail if no legal assignments
• Goal test: the current assignment is complete
1. This is the same for all CSPs (good)2. Every solution appears at depth n with n variables
use depth-first search3. Path is irrelevant, so can also use complete-state formulation4. b = (n - l )d at depth l, hence n! · dn leaves (bad)5.
16
Standard search formulation (incremental)
b is branching factor, d is size of domain, n is number of variables
• Let’s say we had 4 variables, each of which could take one of 4 integer values
17
What This Naïve Search Would Look Like
????
1??? 2??? 3??? 4???
?1?? ?2?? ?3?? ?4?? ??1? ??2? ??3? ??4? ???1 ???2 ???3 ???4
Etc.…terrible branching factor
11?? 12?? 13?? 14?? 1?1? 1?2? 1?3? 1?4? 1??1 1??2 1??3 1??43
At start, all unassigned
18
Backtracking example
19
Backtracking example
20
Backtracking example
21
Backtracking example
יש כמה דרכים איך לשפר את התהליך...•איזה ענף בודקים ראשון–איזה בודקים בפעם השנייה, וכו'–האם אפשר לעצור את התהליך באמצע?–האם אפשר לנצל מידע על הבעיה?–האם אפשר לגזום העץ?–
22
שיפורים
• Minimum remaining values (MRV):• choose the variable with the fewest legal values
23
Minimum Remaining Values
All are the same
here
Two equivalent ones here
Clear choice
• Tie-breaker among MRV variables
• Degree heuristic: choose the variable with the most constraints on remaining variables
24
Degree Heuristic
• Given a variable, choose the least constraining value:
• the one that rules out the fewest values in the remaining variables
–
25
Least Constraining Value
• Given a variable, choose the most constraining value:– This is VERY constrained, so let’s do it first…
26
Most Constraining Value
• Idea: – Keep track of remaining legal values for unassigned
variables– Terminate search when any variable has no legal values–
27
Forward checking
• Tasmania and mainland are independent subproblems
• Subproblems identifiable as connected components of constraint graph
28
Problem Structure
• Hill-climbing, simulated annealing typically work with “complete” states, i.e., all variables assigned
• To apply to CSPs:– use complete states, but with unsatisfied constraints– operators reassign variable values
• Variable selection: randomly select any conflicted variable
• Value selection by min-conflicts heuristic:– choose value that violates the fewest constraints– i.e., hill-climb with h(n) = total number of violated
constraints–
29
Iterative Algorithms for CSPs
Example: Sudoku
Variables:Each )open( square
Domains:{1,2,…,9}
Constraints:
9-way alldiff for each row
9-way alldiff for each column
9-way alldiff for each region
Very Important CSPs: Scheduling
• Many industries. Many multi-million $ decisions. Used extensively for space mission planning. Military uses.
• People really care about improving scheduling algorithms! Problems with phenomenally huge state spaces. But for which solutions are needed very quickly
• Many kinds of scheduling problems e.g.:– Job shop: Discrete time; weird ordering of operations
possible; set of separate jobs.– Batch shop: Discrete or continuous time; restricted
operation of ordering; grouping is important.
Scheduling
• A set of N jobs, J1,…, Jn.
• Each job j is composed of a sequence of operations Oj
1,..., OjLj
• Each operation may use resource R, and has a specific duration in time.
• A resource must be used by a single operation at a time.
• All jobs must be completed by a due time.• Problem: assign a start time to each job.
"יש "מעבר פאזהCheeseman 1993
• CSPs are a special kind of search problem:– states defined by values of a fixed set of variables– goal test defined by constraints on variable values
• Backtracking = depth-first search with one variable assigned per node
• Variable ordering (MRV, degree heuristic) and value selection (least constraining value) heuristics help significantly
• Forward checking prevents assignments that guarantee later failure
• Constraint propagation (e.g., arc consistency) does additional work to constrain values and detect inconsistencies
• The CSP representation allows analysis of problem structure• Tree-structured CSPs can be solved in linear time• Iterative min-conflicts is usually effective in practice
34
Summary