[ . ]

[ ] [ ]

() / @ @@ @@ @@ @

*

+- +, + #+" *%()('& %$ #" !

43 , + *%()" ! $2 1 0

(/ $(/ # .+9 *%(+) ! 8=(

(9 G(/ , (@F 3 ED" (C #

.(' & H'/ (A (C G %

+ #" %J @ #; +" E! F CC

I >

(@ + 8*%()# . '. D8 7 65 !

#+A G+ (

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

'( ] [ ] [

J J J JWWWW

* + , - . /")(0 1 121 3 , # + ! ++ * +0 3 456 4 4 78

! 4 + 9 : ,0 + ;22< , !

!)'( .= ? !9 @ AB5 = +C = , /1,! =# =

) ( informatics +8! D! ? * >: @, 9 I

40

] . [

] [ ] [ '

4!" ?8 ? AJ>,5 , G . 9

0 >2< - G" ? ; > : 9&$)$(.

)S ( @ "! : ?8 ] ! 8 "!AJ # / , /1,! 4 ! , @! I G

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

'' ] [ ] [

8 ,a! 0 4X ! F U!G ! ! =1 /L >8 .K B ^ \

] . [

] [ ] [ 'S

/ 4 ! ^

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

'$ ] [ ] [

1 *X ! K 8^ ! * 9 ^ *X ! * 78! # !! Gb( %.

MARK H. WEBBINK. A New Paradigm for Intellectual Property Rights in Software. Duke Law & Technology Review 12. 2005.

[ . ]

b' [ ] [ ]

:::: ////....

!87 )@ ! ] 8?E 2X 5 9 !8+ 3 1/ 8 K : 0 !/ HX :8+ !87 ( >

8 !. 2 5

[" - , ! *%() @ *& ( .]

[ ] [ ] &'

\E 05 ! 4 8? L 9 E \8K/ ,\; . 1 g 5 ; . 2X/ :8@

"\PW \ 0!@!A * 2Z : D

0!, * \ = ! = 5

] . [

] [ ] [ 'V

- ^ " @9 )S( @P! ": >, * 1/J F ^ 9 " = =9 =28 =."

: ^ " ; Z I 9

AJ W3 I 9 " >8 45 "* )' ( 4X ! K 54 < K :)S' ( .

(15) "Invention" in this Law means the highly advanced creation of technical ideas by which a law of nature is utilized. Art. 2 of the Japanese Patent Act7. Law No. 121 of April 13,1959 as amended by Law No. 220 of December 22, 1999. Entry info force: January 6, 2001, with updates entering into force on October 1, 2001. .

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

'[ ] [ ] [

X" 3L @ IG . L82 B^ R U G 9 \ 9 U G >R

9 >8 3 !\ \ 4\!G G 9 I 4 " ?B 4\

!G K AJ * * H! .

5 , /!" ; 8 I E \, \1^ \3 * \!!K @H9 ?G 3 B !- 41 W3 J N,3 / 482G,5 ; /9 Q

>H9 41 ! P K * G .!H L ?" Q ! G ! * I ,V//'(( . /J " .Q 8 40 K

5 4X !0^ < ; *P"0 -0'(($ .N[.

] . [

] [ ] [ '

L824 " ?B/ J H G " A . ^ 80 U\!G B\, ?\ " 11 J 5J

O AJ K L 41 RH +Inventive Step)( \, U!G 2!K

Capable of Industrial Application.

)V ( *8 45 >+ >! A9 : 23 + .! > + 95 *X ! " 9 X 78 4X ! F^ < b' P! 8 ;/ Q "J @, Q" 48 X" I" .'Anything

under the sun made by man' " A >

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

S( ] [ ] [

\9 \ 1 ^ " @ N /H 9 U 1 5 B, W3* A: * 1 )L. 611-10()'( ( ^ "

: >\8 k\, \9

^

] . [

] [ ] [ S

L: 9 . ")+ ^ 9 ( I\ .!G >8 > /H!^ 8 A

3 ^

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

S' ] [ ] [

manufactures)'$( . \ , 1 N [[$ \8 A\* >R)'b(.

8 ;/! 4 " W3 > 4H 54 < \6 .!\G 4 \/1 # ! 6 /L *P" ! #2 /

, !2 I0 45\ >! U8 I G B !8 /LK ?0 *X ! 8 5J^

] . [

] [ ] [ SS

455 * O @ ! W!0 / @,, W # ! 4!

" 9 X 78 * + 3 * * +)'V( *X ! K >8 ^

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

S$ ] [ ] [

: B: 928 . U\!G G \"

A N J 8 , ,^

] . [

] [ ] [ Sb

@1 D! E )'( \ \ >\+ \, ] J @

^ \/9

I 9 38

[" - , ! *%() @ *& ( .]

[ ] [ ] &S

9a@ > : !0!. 28 5 K ! X*

] . [

] [ ] [ SV

? 9R5 Q 9 ?G G0 9 @!G = !

9 @ ! 8

* *#/d 8 1

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

S[ ] [ ] [

3 K 4 , 8 =G ? KV' *C3 K 9 X *X ! ?G D9 ! ? K)SS( ": \ G >8 ?G :

42\+ E < AJ _, 4! >8representations0 \3 a\9>2< K d >8 H 4G8 / 0 ! / II.

]\ ! ^

] . [

] [ ] [ S

X \! ?\ 4 \K H G! ,!K W G ! *^ 9 J 1 ?G X# /!G0 !K B RHK ! 4: ^ "! *1 Y! *1 5 ?8 ] !! G! 4

^

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

$( ] [ ] [

#18\! \ \ !8\, B ; L ;"! N

[ . ]

$ [ ] [ ]

F ! X*

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

$' ] [ ] [

: : : : Aprams:

HK 9 G 8 4+8In re aprams)S( !K 8 =8 = ^

] . [

] [ ] [ $S

: : : : Walter:

HK 9 3 K 9)$( re Walter G 8 4 *X \! ?\G

J ^

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

$$ ] [ ] [

*#/: ;2"! "" A 4 + 5 /9! 4G "" A 4 GGR J 9 X ^ \

] . [

] [ ] [ $b

Business MethodsWWWW

HK 9 1 * R K XState Street Bank)$$( A\ =81 +

4 ! !K)4 B ( \! 8 AJ ! W3 . 78 *X ! .

D `3 H W3 19 E < X"P! ] ! G! 5 I@1 ?8 X+! . U, >3 * - ,,8 ] !9

I +0 >\,8 ] ! 82, ! 48 K R!5 8 43 !! ^ 8 =28

= =R" >".

+ : > X G A IG *X ! ?G JMethod Business \3^ : X U G X+ ?!! *8 45 : Q! K1 9 50 \!K B 4 B

(44) State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.,149 F.3d 1368. 47 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1596 (Fed. Cir. 1998).

D! ;,1## !! 3 @: seismic precedent William T. Ellis & Aaron Chatterjee. "State Street" Sets Seismic Precedent.13 NAT'L L.J.Sept.1998.p.21

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

$& ] [ ] [

*1 B UR8 ,1 31 * 9 4 A *X !0 J

8 =2!K /a9 1 ?P! !G 4.

1 XH ;K 9 = 3 =58 3 \ : \ *X ! ! 8 4 ! !K^ 8 P! 8

*1 ] @ ?!!0 K0 . The transformation of data is patentable because it produces a useful, concrete

and tangible result."

B W / L 8 4 !0 P! B " 3 G!!E < I P" @P" 0 \ *X ! F !! K2 I B @

J^ 8 : NR,"!".

"On the essential characteristics of the subject matter, in particular, its practical utility".

J > \K /P! 3 K 9 8 * 4 "- B ! @ A 4# J 5J *X \! 4 B !K >8 9 + 1

/KP! B"*1 ]0 K0 "0 *\R1 A\ >

] . [

] [ ] [ $V

@ B 4 8 41, 3 K0 a9 @ *X ! L 9 U! B >8 38 78!

@ U8 +: 10 Q\ B >8 3 A8 4!)$b(.

\ 1 * R E 3 @! >!K I . > X#J \HK P\"! \< \K \9)$&( AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications0

Inc.0_

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

$[ ] [ ] [

,! applied to or limited by physical elements * R\ 4\ 78

1 1 >+ J =!+ =!G I >8

1 =!G B /9 . That physical transformation was not an invariable requirement, but merely one

example of how a mathematical algorithm could bring about a useful application.

4! 9 @P! *8 45 9 .H N!! =85 4\ < 4\ !! *\1 software-related inventions

! !H 4 B >" 4 3. + 9 8 4# 4 HK 9 * >: 4 B H 4!GDiehr ?, 5 G "!

/ 4 B A 4!G. 4 ! 94 /L R\H U! !

] . [

] [ ] [ $

4X ! ? 9R5 Q U! K > ^ \ ^ 9 ( *X ! ? 4!G^

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

b( ] [ ] [

I ": 8 A+ 5 @ *X ! ?G ^H ?8 ] ! J *X !^ W K 9 Q FH K ]\ \R! / R\ \9 R! / 4 >" 9 @_" I

*X ! 8 A >,8 @ .1" +P 3 J B ?8 ^ \+ 9HJ

O GK A G ] ! J 8 9 @ >+ AJ * "-=1 @J " 9 ": #/ >+.

IBM )b((:

" HK 9 Q 4 K " IBM *X ! A >,8 J AJ 19 /! ?8 4 ! ^ "! Q "! >"! ^

[ . ]

b [ ] [ ]

swodniw! ] U ! D ! ] "\/ 84 ! X* :A ! ] 6< 0I . 9 H !"> # 8? !H/K , \ . A * , I G? ! X*Z " $

tic.pO.ZTLOHNEGUH ,SLEKAB reinieR)15( .dibI)25(

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

b' ] [ ] [

b ; U8 /1 H 4 / 8 /8 " >8. & \ B 45 9 N< >"! 5 4 / U80

>+ >! A :4H 0 _ 0 * !. V G >8 Z5 J \ \" 2\8 \ 5 *X ! ?

H0 a9 6 A A! @ D 5 : *X ! ?G >8 J *\ A: * 1 !G

] . [

] [ ] [ bS

L ! : W L =23 +0! : B A9 ? ,J! : 4 ! ^ 9 N,

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

b$ ] [ ] [

W B + *X1 ! / W3 X ^G A = ! ] ! . */" ] ! F ! 5 >2< ] ! I5 @_" A ^2G

41, ;/ ] ! < ^J @! 8 UR+ 9 *8 ? ] ! ?8, A"

[ . ]

bb [ ] [ ]

::::

::::

/H\ 08 \ !\ ] \4 0

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

b& ] [ ] [

::::

[ ! 0! h!04 !0! !0'0 !GA: .

R 0 !0 2 0&V0 + !G.

::::

( I85 K -)V ( '((' \L P\" \9 *X ! , 8^

] . [

] [ ] [ bV

6) Michael Guntersdorfer. SOFTWARE PATENT LAW: UNITED STATES AND EUROPE COMPARED. Duke L. & Tech.Rev. 0006.2003.

7) Pamela Samuelson.BENSON REVISITED:THE CASE AGAINST PATENT PROTECTION FOR ALGORITHMS AND OTHER COMPUTERPROGRAM-RELATED INVENTIONS. Emory Law Journal.39.FALL 1990.1025-1154.

8) Mitchel B. Wallerstein Mary Ellen Mogee Roberta A. Schoen. GLOBAL DIMENSIONS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Office of International Affairs. National Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS. Washington D.C. 1993.

9) Randall Davis. Pamela Samuelson. Mitchell Kapor. Jerome Reichman.A New View of COMMUNICATIONS OF THE Intellectual Property and Software. March 1996/Vol. 39 No. 3. ACM.

10) Patrick Edward Beck. THE PATENTABILITY OF MATHEMATICAL ALGORITHMS. Dayton Law Review. FALL 1991.17 Dayton L. Rev.181- 206.

11) Ruben Bains. A Comparison of the PTOs Computer-Implemented Guidelines with the Current Case Law. The University of Texas School of Law May 1997.

12) VINCENT CHIAPPETTA. Patentability of Computer Software Instruction as an " Article of Manufacture" : Software as Such as the Right Stuff. The JohnMarshall Journal of Computer & Information Law. Volume 17 Issue 1. 1998.

13) William T. Ellis & Aaron Chatterjee. "State Street" Sets Seismic Precedent.13 NAT'L L.J.Sept.1998.

Laws:

1) United States Code Title 35 (USC) Patents.1990. 2) Law on the Intellectual Property Code.(Legislative Part).(No. 92-597 of

July 1 1992 as last amended by Laws Nos. 94-361 of May 10 1994 and 95-4 of January 3 1995)( France).

3) Japanese Patent Act7. Law No. 121 of April 13 1959 as amended by Law No. 220 of December 22 1999. Entry info force: January 6 2001 with updates entering into force on October 1 2001.

Treaties: Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.

]. ( &* @ )(%* ! , - "[

b[ ] [ ] [

Reports: H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476.

http://digital-law-online.info/lpdi1.0/treatise17.htm. Guidelines:

Final Computer Related Examination Patent Guidelines http://www.bitlaw.com/source/soft_pats/final.html.

Case Law: 1- Diamond v. Chakra arty; 447 U.S.303; 1980. 2- re Musgrave 431 F.2d 882.C.C.P.A. 1970. 3- Re Walter 618 F.2d 758.C.C.P.A. 1980. 4- Mazer.v.Stein 347 U.S.1954. 5- Parker v.Flook.437 U.S. 584 .1977 1- Re Alappat. 33 F.3d 1526 31 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1545

(Fed.Cir.1994). 7- State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group Inc.149 F.3d 1368. 47 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1596 (Fed. Cir. 1998). 8- AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications Inc.172 F.3d 1352 1356

Fed.Cir. 1999. 9- In re Vicom Sys. Inc. 1987 O.J.E.P.O. 14 19 (Tech. Bd. App. 1986).