Upload
agnes-hopkins
View
241
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Brief history of subatomic physics
1911 Rutherford discovered atomic nucleus. 1932 Chadwick discovered the neutron. 1932 Heisenberg introduce the concept of isospin. 1933 Stern measured the magnetic moment of the
proton and showed the proton is not point-like.
gs=2 for point-like particle
gp=5.59, gn=-3.83
μ: magnetic moment, s: spin
I discover
the neutron
I am lucky not to care what Pauli said
Brief history of subatomic physics (2)
1935 Hideki Yukawa introduced the meson mediating the force between nucleons. 1947 Powell discovered the first meson: pion. 1949 Fermi and Yang suggest that pion is bound state of proton and neutron.
p
p n
n
p
p n
n
π0 π+
n
p n
p
π-
This potential is named after me !
But it is ME to discover the pion!
00 Kp
Brief history of subatomic physics (3)
π++π-
P+π-
1947 Rochester and Butler discovered the first strange particles Kaon and Hyperon in cosmic rays at Manchester University under the director Lord Blackett who later received Noble prize.
Well done, boys!
Strangeness was introduced, by Murray Gell-Mann and Kazuhiko Nishijima, originally to explain the fact that certain particles, such as the kaons or certain hyperons were created easily in particle collisions, yet decayed much more slowly than expected for their large masses and large production cross sections.
Noting that collisions seemed to always produce pairs of these particles, it was postulated that a new conserved quality, dubbed "strangeness", was preserved during their creation, but not conserved in their decay.
Discovery of strangeness
It is very strange…indeed,,,
2
Discovered by Fermi in 1952 in πp scatterings
Δ(1232) 1st, most prominent and non-overlapping resonance
Who order those
particles?
Pauli’s frustration
The development of new particle accelerators and particle detectors in the 1950s led to the discovery of a huge variety of hadrons, prompting Wolfgang Pauli's remark:
"Had I foreseen this, I would have gone into botany. “
But I obtain my Nobel prize by finding
them!!
Alvarez
Sakata model
1956 Sakata suggested that all hadrons are composed of proton (p), neutron (n) and hyperon (Λ0).and their anti-particles. For example, K+ is bound states of proton and anti-hyperon
It is such a good idea … Karl Marx will be proud of
me!
坂田昌一
SU(3) symmetry
In Sakata model the symmetry is no longer SU(2) isospinBut SU(3).
1 2 3
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
1 0 0 , 0 0 , 0 1 0 ,
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
i
i
4 5 6
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 1 ,
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
i
i
7 8
0 0 0 1 0 01
0 0 , 0 1 0 .3
0 0 0 0 2
i
i
exp(i θa‧λa)exp(iθa σ‧ a)
By this way mesons can be described as one octets and one singlet.
Difficulty of Sakata Model
However, for baryon we have one 15et, two triplets and one sextet. There are many missing baryons in the spectrum.
And we shall not forget that proton and neutron are not point-likeBut composite particles since they have complicated inner structures.
Eight-fold way (八正道 ) 1961 Gell-Mann and Ne’eman
independently suggested that one should put nucleon and hyperon with Ξ and Σ as octet.
Debut of Quark
1964 Gell-Mann and Zweig independently proposed a model in which baryons and mesons are composites of a fundamental triplet of U(3), Gell-Mann called them “quarks” and Zweig called them “aces”.
Fractional charge !!
In 1963, when I assigned the name "quark" to the fundamental constituents of the nucleon, I had the sound first, without the spelling, which could have been "kwork". Then, in one of my occasional perusals of Finnegans Wake, by James Joyce, I came across the word "quark" in the phrase "Three quarks for Muster Mark". Since "quark" (meaning, for one thing, the cry of the gull) was clearly intended to rhyme with "Mark," as well as "bark" and other such words, I had to find an excuse to pronounce it as "kwork". But the book represents the dream of a publican named Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker. Words in the text are typically drawn from several sources at once, like the "portmanteau" words in "Through the Looking Glass". From time to time, phrases occur in the book that are partially determined by calls for drinks at the bar. I argued, therefore, that perhaps one of the multiple sources of the cry "Three quarks for Muster Mark" might be "Three quarts for Mister Mark," in which case the pronunciation "kwork" would not be totally unjustified. In any case, the number three fitted perfectly the way quarks occur in nature.
Gell-Mann explained the origin of “quark”:
Puzzle of Δ++
Δ++ is a spin 3/2 fermion
Δ++=|u u u > |↑↑↑ >
Why Δ++ has symmetric wave function?
Han and Nambu suggested that quarks are triplet of new hidden quantum number.(1965)
One interesting remark from Schwinger…
By O.W. Greenberg, hep/ph-0212174
But some people did follow Schwinger’s insight…
I told you…….
Debut of Color SU(3) symmetry
1950s C.N. Yang and Mills suggested to localize SU(2) isospin and built a non-Ableian gauge theory.
1965 Han, Nambu suggested that quark possess an additional SU(3) gauge degree of freedom: color and quarks would interact via an octet of vector gauge bosons: the gluons.
QCD Langrangian
n=1,2,3; a=1,2…8
Our world is colorful!
Nambu and Han
Resistance to quark and color
Unobserved fractionally charged quark seems outrageous!
A new hidden degree of freedom is doubly outrageous!!
Even Gell-Mann kept ambiguous attitude toward the reality of quarks!!!
Hmmm…To be or not to be…I am not sure…….Hmmm….
Deep Inelastic Scattering and Parton 1966 Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS)
showed the proton consists of many weakly interacting point-like particles.
Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
1973 Gross, Wilczek, and Politzer discovered asymptotic freedom which explains DIS data.
Namely the coupling constant g becomes small when the momentum transfer is large.
On the other hand when the momentum transfer is small the coupling constant is large! It is called infrared slavery .
At the strongly coupling regime only colourless object is allowed. It is called confinement. So far there is no rigor mathematical proof.
q
q
q
Mystery remains:Of the many possibilities for combining quarks with colour into colorless hadrons, only twoconfigurations were found, till now… Because we cannot apply QCD at low Q2 since then g is large and the underlying theory is strongly coupling Quantum field theory which means no one can solve itanalytically !
So fundamental theory is at hand, but….
Mission impossible?
QCD is a very successful theory, but can we use QCD to study the nucleon structure and even the nuclear force?
quark, gluon baryon,meson
High Q2, perturbative QCD Low Q2, meson-exchange
?Asymptotic freedom confinement
Just do it !
Non-relativistic Quark Models
Assume baryons are composed of three massive
constituent quarks bound in a confining potential. The constituent quarks carry the quantum numbers of
QCD quarks but much heavier. Although the non-relativistic quark model lacks any field
theory basis, its phenomenological value is beyond doubt. One traditional success of this kind of models is the
anomalous magnetic moments of the proton and neutron. There are many variants due to the choices of the
potentials.
Isgur-Karl Model
One of most successful non-relativistic quark model is invented by Nath Isgur(’78)
The Hamiltonian consists of kinetic term, mass term, confinement potential and oneHyperfine interaction whose form is one-gluon-exchange type:
“Wave function” of the proton:
μ0 is the Bohr magneton of the quark:
The anomalous magnetic moment of the proton is:
Similarly one obtains:
Actually this result solely relies on the SU(6)SF symmetry
Quark model predictions for baryons
To describe the known baryon spectrum a lot of quark modelshave been developed. General symmetry principles of quarkmodels as SU(6)*O(3) predict more states than were observed in the experiment. Different models predict different number and positioning of these states.
“string” linear confinement + Coulomb hyperfine interaction as SU(6) configuration mixing Isgur-Karl, Isgur-Capstick and collaborators
linear confinement + Coulomb potential 3-body forces (expected based on QCD)
Giannini–Santopinto and collaborators
linear confinement. SU(6) configuration mixing by spin-flavour-dependent interaction (GBE) Glozman-Riska; Graz group
The search for the missing states can provide a good test for basic principles of quark models and the effects of quark-quark correlation.
Large Nc QCD and SU(6) QCD is a SU(3) gauge theory If one studies SU(Nc) gauge theory, the
n makes 1/Nc expansion, then one finds when Nc becomes infinity, the baryon sector owns a symmetry SU(2Nf).
It is amusing to find constituent quark model owns same symmetry with large Nc QCD
How to make models more “QCD-like”?
Baryon is a complicated many-body system in QCD but miraculously one can use constituent quarks and obtains many good results. One justification is to treat the constituent quarks as quais-particles which are collective excitation modes.
Therefore one needs more understanding of QCD vacuum to construct more realistic models.
However, QCD vacuum is very complicated so one can only try to grasp some aspects of QCD vacuum from our limited knowledge, such as spontaneously breaking of Chiral symmetry (χSB)
Chiral Symmetry of QCD if mq=0
Left-hand and right-hand quark:
QCD Lagrangian is invariant if
Massless QCD Lagrangian has SU(2)LxSU(2)R chiral symmetry.
Therefore SU(2)LXSU(2)R →SU(2)V, ,if mu=md
Quark mass effect
If mq≠0
SU(2)A is broken by the quark mass
QCD Lagrangian is invariant if θR=θL.
Spontaneous symmetry breaking
Mexican hat potential
Spontaneous symmetry breaking: a system that is symmetric with respect to some symmetry group goes into a vacuum state that is not symmetric. The system no longer appears to behave in a symmetric manner.
Example:V(φ)=aφ2+bφ4, a<0, b>0.
U(1) symmetry is lost if one expands around the degenerated vacuum!
Furthermore it costs no energy to rum around the orbit →massless mode exists!! (Goldstone boson).
20
07
AP
CT
P w
ork
sho
p a
t P
OS
TE
CH
2
6~
28
Fe
b.
20
07
Instanton vacuum configuration
Gluonic potential of QCD
Self-duality condition: minimizing the potential
Topological number realted to the ground state
Guage transformation of the ground state via
Instanton
Winding number from homotopic SU(N) gaugetransformation
Tunneling between vacuua
Instanton solution for the self-duality condition
Natural mechanism for SSB
Instanton and SχSB
Dynamical symmetry breaking and fermion mass generation
Dynamical Quark Mass ~ 350 MeV
Gap EquationChiral condensation
Pion as Goldstone boson
π is the lightest hadron. Therefore it plays a dominant the long-distance physics. More important is the fact that soft π interacts each other weakly because they must couple derivatively! Actually if their momenta go to zero, π must decouple with any particles, including itself.
~ t/(4πF)2
Start point of an EFT for pions.
Double faces of pion
Pion in constituent quark model is treat as quark-antiquark pair.
However it is Goldstone boson associated with SχSB.
Pion plays dominant role in the low-energy QCD phenomenology ! There are two exam
ples…
Nucleon E.M form factors
Hofstadter determined the precise size of the proton and neutron by measuring their form factor.
Pion cloud surrounding the nucleon
Both the proton and neutron have a central, positively charged core surrounded by a double cloud of π-mesons.
Both clouds are positively charged in the proton, but in the neutron the inner cloud is negatively charged, thus giving a net zero charge for the entire particle.
∣n > = n∣ > 0+Z pπ∣ - > +…
Both N and ∆ are members of the [56]-plet and the three quarks are in the (1s)3 states
In a symmetric SU(6) quark model the E.M excitation of the could proceed only via M1 transition. If the is deformed, then the photon can excite a nucleon into a through electric E2 and Coulomb C2 quardrupole transitions.
REM = E2/M1 ≈ -2.5 %, (MAMI, LEGS) ( indication of a deformed )
N→Δ(1232) transition form factor
S wave →S wave
S wave →D wave
(3)3
. .
,
2 8 13( ,
2 3)
conf
sij iji j i j i jij
i
OGEP
Oj ij
conf
P
H O
GE
VH T V
r S S S r S r S Sm m r
V V
V ij
QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
Fermi contact term
(2) (2) (0)[ ]ij ijR S
D-state component
PD(%) Q(fm2)
N(938) 0.4 0
1.9 -0.089
Too small !!
-0.8% < REM < -0.3%
Deformation in constituent quark model
Tensor force
Pion cloud plays essential role!
How to make Quark model more “chiral”?
Coupling of spins, isospins etc. of 3 quarks
mean field non-linear system soliton rotation of soliton
Coherent :1p-1h,2p-2h,....
A crazy idea from Tony Skyrme
1962 British scientist Tony Skyrme created a very interesting idea, namely can one create a fermion from a scalar field? The answer is YES and the rsult is skyrmion.
A skyrmion is a homotopically non-trivial classical solution of a nonlinear sigma model with; i.e., a particular case of a topological soliton.
If spacetime has the topology S3×R (for space and time respectively), then classical configurations are classified by an integral winding number because the third homotopy group: π3(SU(N)xSU(N)/SU(N))=Z
Skyrme model: SU(2) Skyrmion
Starting from Nonlinear sigma model, Skyrme write down the following Langrangian:
Skyrme found a family of class solutions of the above Langrangian:
N; Integer valued topological charge
1. Bag models [R.L. Jaffe ‘76, J. De Swart ‘80]Jp =1/2- lightest pentaquarkMasses higher than 1700 MeV, width ~ hundreds MeV
2. Soliton models [Diakonov, Petrov ‘84, Chemtob‘85, Praszalowicz ‘87, Walliser ‘92]Exotic anti-decuplet of baryons with lightest S=+1Jp =1/2+ pentaquark with mass in the range
1500-1800 MeV.
Mass of the pentaquark is roughly 5 M +(strangeness) ~ 1800 MeVAn additional q –anti-q pair is added as constituent
Mass of the pentaquark is rougly 3 M +(1/baryon size)+(strangeness) ~ 1500MeVAn additional q –anti-q pair is added in the form of excitation of nearly masslesschiral field
Theoretical predictions for pentaquarks
The anti-decuplet
( )uud d d ss
( )uus d d ss
( )uss uu d d
Width < 15 MeV !
Diakonov, Petrov, Polyakov, 1997 (St.Petersburg, Bochum) Praszalowicz 1987
Summary
Should we trust quark models? Should we continue to use quark models? Can we tell which model is more suitable than
others for some certain physical quantity? Can we learn anything from quark models
either when it works or not? Is it possible for us to solve no-perturbative
QCD in the future?
To dream the impossible dream 要敢夢不可能實現的夢To fight the unbeatable foe 要敢對抗無法擊敗的敵人To bear with unbearable sorrow 忍受那無法忍受的苦楚
To run where the brave dare not go 奔向那勇者不敢前去的地方To right the unrightable wrong 改正那無法改正的錯誤To love pure and chaste from afar 追求遠方的純潔與高雅
To try when your arms are too weary 當雙臂疲累不堪時To reach the unreachable star 更要試著去靠近那遙不可及的星星
This is my quest 這是我的追求To follow that star 去追隨星星
No matter how hopeless 不論希望多麼渺茫No matter how far 不管目標多麼遙遠
To fight for the right Without question or pause 我將毫無遲疑的為正義而戰
To be willing to march into Hell For a heavenly cause 為神聖的使命而奮不顧身
And I know if I'll only be true To this glorious quest 我知道只要堅持對此榮耀的追求
That my heart will lie peaceful and calm When I'm laid to my rest 當我躺下之時我心將永享寧靜
And the world will be better for this 世界也因此變得更好That one man, scorned and covered with scars 受到輕視且滿身傷痕的
人們Still strove with his last ounce of courage 為追求那遙不可及的星星To reach the unreachable star 將依然全力奮戰直到耗盡所有的勇氣