Upload
elwin-parks
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-3 Today’s Lecture Measuring systems benefits Differentiating systems roles IT investment assessments Return on (IT) Investments Conclusion
Citation preview
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Management Issues in Systems Development
Chapter 10Information Systems
Management in Practice 8th Edition
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-2
Today’s Lecture Introduction Project Management
Definition, scope, best practices Change management Risk management
Modernizing Legacy Systems To replace or not to? Improvement
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-3
Today’s Lecture Measuring systems benefits
Differentiating systems roles IT investment assessments Return on (IT) Investments
Conclusion
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-4
Introduction What are the management issues
surrounding systems development? IS as three separate businesses (lens)
Infrastructure management (operations) Customer relationship (helpdesk) Product innovation (systems development)
Project management is most sought-after skill in systems development today
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-5
Introduction IS as three separate businesses (lens)
Infrastructure management (operations) Goal: reduce cost
Customer relationship (helpdesk) Goal: Service Often outsourced Customer is the king
Product innovation (systems development) Goal: Speed Developer is the king
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-6
Project Management Project is a collection of related tasks and
activities undertaken to achieve a specific goal within a finite time period (temporal)
IT projects are similar to other forms but arguably more difficult Intangibility (you cannot see it or feel it!)
IT project management Coordination (managing interdependencies of
numerous tasks)
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-7
Project Management cont’d PMI (Project management Institute)
Established the standard for project management The leading association in educating project
managers in all fields Certificate: PMP (Project Management
Professional) Book: A Guide to the Project Management Body of
Knowledge (PMBOK) Five processes: Initiation, planning, executing,
controlling, and closing
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-8
Scope: Job of a Project Manager Getting the project started Managing the schedule Managing the budget Managing the benefits Managing the risks, opportunities and issues Soliciting feedback and formative evaluation
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-9
Scope: Job of a Project Manager cont’d Risk: A potential threat or something that can o
wrong that may prevent the project from achieving its business benefits Risk Register (Risk Log) Risk has potential to be happened
Opportunity: A project going better than planned Issue: Something that threatens the success of the
project Issue log (Issue list) Issue is already happened
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-10
A Day In the Life of an IT Project Manager Larry Cone is VP Software Development Cone began a highly informative and
entertaining blog about his day-to-day experience September 16, 2007: Learning from Failure May 24, 2007: Everything You Need to Know about
Software Architecture in kindergarten October 10, 2006: To the user, definitions are the key September 5, 2006: Don’t do the Wrong System
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-11
Change Management Managing change (people side of system)
Assimilation of new systems into work processes Resistance (organizational inertia)
ODR offers a methodology to manage technology change (stakeholders involved) Sponsor:
Person or group that legitimize the change Change agent:
Person or group who causes the change to happen Target:
Person or group who is being expected to change
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-12
Change Management cont’d Discussed in earlier chapters Early 1990s architecture
More flexibility than mainframe systems Workload (processing) split between client and
server Integration of pizzazz of the PC world with
the necessary back-end production strengths of the mainframe world
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-13
The BOC GroupCase example: Change Management Re-engineer BOC’s core processes Teams assigned different processes to improve
Understand semantics of entire process How to implement change Input into training plan Devise communication plan
Garnering True Executive Sponsorship Vice presidents and directors ODR training workshop for sponsors
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-14
The BOC Group cont’d Involving middle management
Advisory council Upward job: give feedback on implemented
changes Downward job: obtain employee buy-in
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-15
The BOC Group cont’d One successful change project
Team studied existing paperwork processing for delivering gas products and invoicing customers
Synergy established among IM and business staff Unexpected positive change dynamics (IT triggered)
Implemented PODD (Point-of-Delivery handheld Device) in place of paper
PODD advisory council facilitated upward and downward communication
Training program for drivers (less resistance) Sponsors identified and mitigated project risks
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-16
Risk Management Management of risks in IT projects crucial
Technical risk Sub-performance; scope creep
Business risk IT-triggered organizational change not as planned
Risk management “cookbook”1. Assess the risk2. Mitigate the risk3. Adjust project management approach
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-17
Risk Management cont’d
1. Assess change risks (predominant factors) Leadership
Project leader should be business executive How does project leadership affect outcome?
Employees’ perspective How would they react and why?
Scope and urgency Is the scope too wide? How urgent?
Gibson’s “plus-minus” decision tree
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-18
Risk Management cont’d
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-19
Risk Management cont’d
2. Mitigate the risks Risk avoidance
Identify and eliminate source of perceived risk Risk limitation
Implementing controls to contain potential risk effects Risk transfer
Letting others assume risk (outsourcing)
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-20
Risk Management cont’d3. Adjust project management approach
Project management style Authoritative vs. participatory
Project budget and timeframe Rigid vs. flexible
Gibson’s Four Approaches Big Bang Approach (all other 3 must be positive) Improvisation Guided evolution Top-down coordination
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-21
Gibson’s Four Approaches to Risk Management
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-22
Dow Corning
Case Example: Risk Management Successful ERP implementation (1995-
1999) How did it manage the different business risks?
Phase 0: Get Ready (assessed risks) Leadership (high) Employee perception (high) Scope and urgency (high)
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-23
Dow Corning cont’d Phase 1: Understand the new system
Used improvisation approach of participatory management and flexible deadlines Emphasized building employee commitment
Phase 2: Redesign work processes Used guided evolution approach of participatory
management and fixed deadlines Achieving employee commitment did little to get work
processes redesigned Continued through the pilot (ERP cutover in new
European subsidiaries)
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-24
Dow Corning cont’d Phase 3: Implement ERP worldwide
Used top-down coordination with an authoritative management style and flexible timelines Pilot’s success demonstrated managers’ resolve and
shifted employee perception to the positive “Company wide” scope created negative shift
Phase 4: Complete implementation Used the Big Bang approach of authoritative
management and firm deadlines ERP implemented in most sites by 1998, so all risk
factors turned positive
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-25
Fast Tips: Good IS Management Establish the ground rules Foster discipline, planning, documentation and
management Obtain and document “final” user requirements Obtain tenders from all appropriate potential
vendors Include vendors in decision making Convert existing data Follow through after implementation
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-26
Modernizing Legacy Systems BCG study: Replace or not?
About 40% of replacement projects fail Seduction of “new toys” Upgrading is a better option
BCG three analyses (replace or not) Costs-benefits of system Fit between new system and business needs IS staff capabilities (Can they do the job?)
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-27
Options for Improving Legacy Systems
1. Restructuring the system Getting system ready for reengineering e.g., An application working fine but not running
efficiently needs restructuring 7 steps involved in the process
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-28
Restructuring the System
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-29
Options for Improving Legacy Systems cont’d
2. Reengineering the system (not BPR) Reverse Engineering
Extracting and converting data elements from existing systems and formats
Forward Engineering Moving them to new hardware platforms and creating
new applications
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-30
Reengineering the System
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-31
Verizon DirectoriesCase Example: Reverse Engineering Produced, marketed and distributed
telephone directories Directory publishing system
Four main databases, designed application by application Data elements difficult to change, enhance and reuse
Acquired reengineering tools to improve databases
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-32
Verizon Directories Blueprint project
Used a graphical tool to “reverse engineer” a poorly designed database from its physical to its data model, and designed a new data model (blueprint) that is more flexible
Reuse project Employed reengineering tools to reuse data
elements in the largest existing database to create a new production scheduling system
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-33
Options for Improving Legacy Systems cont’d
3. Refurbishing the system Add new extensions to a “good working” old
system Some examples of legacy system extensions
Supply input in a new manner Make new uses of input Allow programs to deal more comprehensively with
data Add a Web interface around a “blackbox”
e.g., FedEx’s package tracking system
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-34
Options for Improving Legacy Systems cont’d
4. Rejuvenate the system Adding new functions to a reengineered system
to make it more valuable Phases of rejuvenation process
1. Recognize a system’s potential2. Clean up the system and make it more efficient3. Establish a strategic role for the system
Add new functionalities to create business value
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-35
Amazon.comCase Example: System Rejuvenation Initiated Web Services program (2002)
Access to Amazon’s state-of-art Web technology platform (pay for what you use)
No control over how subscribers use its system, but in return, others are creating gadgets, links, services, and software that Amazon.com cannot accomplish on its own
Diversify into e-commerce platform business Used Web Services to rejuvenate its internal
system by giving it a strategic role via XML
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-36
Options for Improving Legacy Systems cont’d
5. Rearchitect the system Involves having an architecture for new systems,
and then using that design to upgrade legacy systems
CTOs now devising enterprise level IT architecture
How systems are interconnected One-system-at-a-time migration strategy
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-37
Toyota Motor SalesCase Example: Rearchitect the System Created global reference IT architecture
Standard and integrated application development environment
Mapping of business requirement to IT strategies New architecture enabled the company to
Remediate legacy systems Keep systems designs robust Deliver application faster Permit future flexibility
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-38
Options for Improving Legacy Systems cont’d
6. Replace with a package or service Replace a legacy system with a commercial
package Commercial packages have many options and
features that can be customized Replace with service delivered over the Internet
Quick availability Outsource IS responsibility to vendors Cost can be expensed (tax benefits)
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-39
Wachovia
Case Example: Replace with a service Legacy contact management system
Incompatible with new systems and not adaptable for new business needs
Maintained by consultants ($) Replaced with SalesForce CRM system
Pay by use Equivalent to maintenance costs
Provides necessary management information
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-40
Options for Improving Legacy Systems cont’d
7. Rewrite the system System is “too far gone” to rescue
Code convoluted and patched; technology antiquated
Alternative to replacement Rare (usually only for very specialized systems)
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-41
Measuring Systems Benefits Measuring the value of information systems
is an ongoing task for IS managers (justify) Constant evolution of technology
Top executives demand specific links between new systems and corporate financial measures (e.g., ROA, revenue) Is this reasonable?
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-42
Measuring Systems Benefits cont’d Difficult task because IT itself is only one of many
factors that contribute to successful use of systems IT can trigger a series of events toward a goal, but those
events are very much dependent on organizational context Can you measure the value of decision support systems or
data warehouses? Can you calculate the ROI of e-commerce systems?
Three suggestions to alleviate this conundrum1. Distinguish between different roles of systems2. Measure what is important to management3. Assess investments across organizational levels
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-43
Distinguish Between the Different Roles of Systems Information systems can play three roles
1. Performance: “Support systems” to increase efficiency
2. Business Value: Carry out a business strategy e.g., CAD system used to design products
3. Product or Service: Itself or as a basis for a product or service
e.g., Web-based information services
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-44
Distinguish Between the Different Roles of Systems1. Measuring organizational performance
Meeting deadlines and milestones Operating within budget Quality (efficiency, costs)
e.g., time and costs reductions
2. Measuring business value Impact on value network (relationships)
Customers, partners, suppliers
3. Measuring a product or service Can be measured as a business venture (ROI)
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-45
Measure What is Important to Management Identify all indicators management use
(besides accounting) to determine corporate performance Customer relations
e.g., satisfaction Employee morale Cycle time
In other words, devise measurements for what management considers its key success factor(s), with regard to information systems
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-46
Assess Investments Across Organizational Levels Sources of value for IT at three levels
Individual Division (or department) Corporation
Impact focus of an IT investment extends to Economic performance payoffs Organizational process payoffs Technology impacts (functionality)
Combine views to form 3 x 3 matrix
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-47
A Trucking CompanyCase Example: Assess Investment Across
Organizational Levels Refrigerated carrier business
Sustained 50% loss in market share $10 million IT investment to improve position
Satellite tracking and communication system Measures
Increased driver productivity (.5 hr/day; $59.60/mth savings)
Improved load truck matching (1% deadhead time; $49.68/mth savings)
Customers willing to pay premium for ability to communicate (unexpected revenue benefits)
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-48
Do Investors Value IT Investments? A study found that every $1 invested in computers
yielded up to $17 in stock market value (and no less than $5) vis-à-vis $1 invested in property, plant and equipment (book value)
only yielded $1 in stock market value $1 investment in other assets (inventory, liquid assets, and
accounts receivables) yielded only $0.70 Researchers’ argument
IT investment creates intangible asset value Know-how, skills, organizational structures
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-49
Conclusion Project management is cardinal but also
toughest job in IS Cannot be outsourced Managerial skills (technical and business) crucial
Mostly about managing people (stakeholders) IS project success is dependent on
Sponsor commitment understanding and exercising role
Assisting targets in making the change
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-50
Conclusion cont’d Information systems difficult to keep up-to-
date Process of justifying a new system can
uncover what is important to management Measuring benefits afterward can help
companies spot latent benefits Investors more highly value companies with
higher IT investments? What do you think?
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10-51
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice HallPublishing as Prentice Hall