View
249
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 1
Chapter 6
Managing Quality
2© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 2
Outline
Quality And StrategyQuality And Strategy
Defining QualityDefining Quality
Why Quality is important?Why Quality is important?
Seven tools of TQMSeven tools of TQM
3© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 3
Quality and Strategy
Managing quality supports Managing quality supports differentiationdifferentiation, , low costlow cost, and , and response strategiesresponse strategies
Quality helps firms increase sales Quality helps firms increase sales and reduce costsand reduce costs
Building a quality organization is a Building a quality organization is a demanding taskdemanding task
4© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 4
How Quality improves Profitability?
5© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 5
Ways Quality Improves Productivity
Improved Improved QualityQuality
Increased Increased ProfitsProfits
Increased productivity Lower rework and scrap costs Lower warranty costs
Reduced Costs
Improved response
Higher Prices
Improved reputation
Sales Gains
Figure 6.1Figure 6.1
6© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 6
How do you define Quality?
7© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 7
Defining Quality
The totality of features and The totality of features and characteristics of a product or characteristics of a product or
service that bears on its ability to service that bears on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needssatisfy stated or implied needs
American Society for QualityAmerican Society for Quality
8© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 8
Different Views
User-basedUser-based – better performance, – better performance, more featuresmore features
Manufacturing-basedManufacturing-based – – conformance to standards, conformance to standards, making it right the first timemaking it right the first time
Product-based Product-based – specific and – specific and measurable attributes of the measurable attributes of the product product
9© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 9
Implications of Quality
1.1. Company reputationCompany reputation Perception of new productsPerception of new products
Employment practicesEmployment practices
Supplier relationsSupplier relations
2.2. Product liabilityProduct liability Reduce riskReduce risk
3.3. Global implicationsGlobal implications Improved ability to competeImproved ability to compete
10© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 10
Malcom Baldrige National Quality Award
Established in 1988 by the U.S. Established in 1988 by the U.S. governmentgovernment
Designed to promote TQM practicesDesigned to promote TQM practices
Recent winnersRecent winners The Bama Companies, Kenneth W. The Bama Companies, Kenneth W.
Monfort College of Business, Monfort College of Business, Caterpillar Financial Services, Baptist Caterpillar Financial Services, Baptist Hospital, Clarke American Checks, Hospital, Clarke American Checks, Los Alamos National BankLos Alamos National Bank
11© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 11
What are the costs of quality?
12© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 12
Costs of Quality
Prevention costs - reducing the Prevention costs - reducing the potential for defectspotential for defects
Appraisal costs - evaluating Appraisal costs - evaluating products, parts, and servicesproducts, parts, and services
Internal failure - producing defective Internal failure - producing defective parts or service before deliveryparts or service before delivery
External costs - defects discovered External costs - defects discovered after deliveryafter delivery
13© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 13
External Failure
Internal Failure
Prevention
Costs of Quality
Appraisal
Total Cost
Quality Improvement
Total CostTotal Cost
14© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 14
TQM (Total Quality Management)
Refers to a quality emphasis that:
Encompasses entire organization, from
supplier to customer. And Stresses a
commitment by management to have a continuing, companywide drive toward excellence in all aspects of products and services that are important to the customer
15© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 15
Deming’s Fourteen Points (How he implemented TQM!?)
1. Create consistency of purpose2. Lead to promote change3. Build quality into the product; stop
depending on inspection4. Build long term relationships based on
performance, not price5. Continuously improve product, quality, and
service6. Start training7. Emphasize leadership
Table 6.1Table 6.1
16© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 16
Deming’s Fourteen Points
8. Drive out fear9. Break down barriers between departments10. Stop haranguing workers11. Support, help, improve12. Remove barriers to pride in work13. Institute a vigorous program of education
and self-improvement14. Put everybody in the company to work on
the transformation
Table 6.1Table 6.1
17© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 17
We develop those into Seven Concepts of TQM
1. Continuous improvement
2. Six Sigma
3. Employee empowerment
4. Benchmarking
5. Just-in-time (JIT)
6. Taguchi concepts
7. Knowledge of TQM tools
18© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 18
1- Continuous Improvement
Represents continual Represents continual improvement of all processes improvement of all processes
Involves all operations and work Involves all operations and work centers including suppliers and centers including suppliers and customerscustomersPeople, Equipment, Materials, People, Equipment, Materials,
ProceduresProcedures
19© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 19
2. DoTest the
plan
3. CheckIs the plan working?
4. ActImplement
the plan
1.PlanIdentify the
improvement and make
a plan
Shewhart’s PDCA Model for Continuous Improvement
Figure 6.3Figure 6.3
20© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 20
Seven Concepts of TQM
1. Continuous improvement
2. Six Sigma
3. Employee empowerment
4. Benchmarking
5. Just-in-time (JIT)
6. Taguchi concepts
7. Knowledge of TQM tools
21© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 21
2-Six Sigma
Originally developed by Motorola, Originally developed by Motorola, Six Sigma refers to an extremely Six Sigma refers to an extremely high measure of process capabilityhigh measure of process capability
A Six Sigma capable process will A Six Sigma capable process will return no more than 3.4 defects per return no more than 3.4 defects per million operations (DPMO)million operations (DPMO)
Highly structured approach to Highly structured approach to process improvementprocess improvement
22© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 22
Six Sigma Improvement Model
1.1. Define critical outputs Define critical outputs and identify gaps for and identify gaps for improvementimprovement
2.2. Measure the work and Measure the work and collect process datacollect process data
3.3. Analyze the dataAnalyze the data
4.4. Improve the processImprove the process
5.5. Control the new process to Control the new process to make sure new performance make sure new performance is maintainedis maintained
DMAIC ApproachDMAIC Approach
23© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 23
Seven Concepts of TQM
1. Continuous improvement
2. Six Sigma
3. Employee empowerment
4. Benchmarking
5. Just-in-time (JIT)
6. Taguchi concepts
7. Knowledge of TQM tools
24© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 24
3- Employee Empowerment
Getting employees involved in product and process improvements
85% of quality problems are due to process and material
Techniques Build communication networks that include
employees Develop open, supportive supervisors Move responsibility to employees Build a high-morale organization Create formal team structures
25© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 25
Quality Circles
Group of employees who meet regularly to solve problems
Trained in planning, problem solving, and statistical methods
Often led by a facilitator Very effective when done properly
26© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 26
Seven Concepts of TQM
1. Continuous improvement
2. Six Sigma
3. Employee empowerment
4. Benchmarking
5. Just-in-time (JIT)
6. Taguchi concepts
7. Knowledge of TQM tools
27© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 27
Use internal
benchmarking
if you’re big
enough
4-Benchmarking
Selecting best practicesSelecting best practices to use as a to use as a standard for performancestandard for performance
Determine what to Determine what to benchmarkbenchmark
Form a benchmark teamForm a benchmark team Identify benchmarking partnersIdentify benchmarking partners Collect and analyze benchmarking Collect and analyze benchmarking
informationinformation Take action to match or exceed the Take action to match or exceed the
benchmarkbenchmark
28© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 28
Best Practices for Resolving Customer Complaints
Make it easy for clients to complainMake it easy for clients to complain Respond quickly to complaintsRespond quickly to complaints Resolve complaints on first contactResolve complaints on first contact Use computers to manage Use computers to manage
complaintscomplaints Recruit the best for customer Recruit the best for customer
service jobsservice jobs
29© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 29
Seven Concepts of TQM
1. Continuous improvement
2. Six Sigma
3. Employee empowerment
4. Benchmarking
5. Just-in-time (JIT)
6. Taguchi concepts
7. Knowledge of TQM tools
30© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 30
What is a “Just In Time” system? And How is it related to Quality?
31© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 31
5-Just-in-Time (JIT):
Relationship to quality:
JIT cuts the cost of qualityJIT cuts the cost of quality
JIT improves qualityJIT improves quality
Better quality means less Better quality means less inventory and better, easier-to-inventory and better, easier-to-employ JIT systememploy JIT system
JIT systems are designed to produce or deliver goods
as they are needed
32© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 32
Just-in-Time (JIT)
‘‘Pull’ system of production scheduling Pull’ system of production scheduling including supply managementincluding supply management Production only when signaledProduction only when signaled
Allows reduced inventory levelsAllows reduced inventory levels Inventory costs money and hides process Inventory costs money and hides process
and material problemsand material problems
Encourages improved process and Encourages improved process and product qualityproduct quality
33© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 33
Just-In-Time (JIT) Example
ScrapUnreliable Vendors
Capacity Imbalances
Work in process inventory level
(hides problems)
34© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 34
Just-In-Time (JIT) Example
Reducing inventory revealsReducing inventory revealsproblems so they can be solvedproblems so they can be solved
ScrapUnreliable Vendors
Capacity Imbalances
35© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 35
Seven Concepts of TQM
1. Continuous improvement
2. Six Sigma
3. Employee empowerment
4. Benchmarking
5. Just-in-time (JIT)
6. Taguchi concepts
7. Knowledge of TQM tools
36© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 36
Taguchi Concepts Most Quality problems are the result of poor product and process Most Quality problems are the result of poor product and process design.design.
Experimental design methods to Experimental design methods to improve product and process designimprove product and process design
Identify key component and Identify key component and process variables affecting process variables affecting product variationproduct variation
37© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 37
Seven Concepts of TQM
1. Continuous improvement
2. Six Sigma
3. Employee empowerment
4. Benchmarking
5. Just-in-time (JIT)
6. Taguchi concepts
7. Knowledge of TQM tools
38© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 38
Tools of TQM
To empower employees and implement TQM as a continuing effort, everyone in the organization must be trained in the techniques of TQM.
39© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 39
Tools of TQM Tools for Generating IdeasTools for Generating Ideas
Check sheetsCheck sheetsScatter diagramsScatter diagramsCause and effect diagramsCause and effect diagrams
Tools to Organize the DataTools to Organize the DataPareto chartsPareto chartsFlow chartsFlow charts
Tools for Identifying ProblemsTools for Identifying ProblemsHistogramHistogramStatistical process control chartStatistical process control chart
40© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 40
/
/
/ / /// /
// ///
// ////
///
//
/
Hour
Defect 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A
B
C
/
/
//
/
Seven Tools for TQM
(a)(a) Check SheetCheck Sheet: An organized method of : An organized method of recording datarecording data
Figure 6.5Figure 6.5
41© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 41
Tools of TQM Tools for Generating IdeasTools for Generating Ideas
Check sheetsCheck sheetsScatter diagramsScatter diagramsCause and effect diagramsCause and effect diagrams
Tools to Organize the DataTools to Organize the DataPareto chartsPareto chartsFlow chartsFlow charts
Tools for Identifying ProblemsTools for Identifying ProblemsHistogramHistogramStatistical process control chartStatistical process control chart
42© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 42
Seven Tools for TQM
(b)(b) Scatter DiagramScatter Diagram: A graph of the value : A graph of the value of one variable vs. another variableof one variable vs. another variable
AbsenteeismAbsenteeism
Pro
du
cti
vit
yP
rod
uc
tiv
ity
Figure 6.5Figure 6.5
43© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 43
Tools of TQM Tools for Generating IdeasTools for Generating Ideas
Check sheetsCheck sheetsScatter diagramsScatter diagramsCause and effect diagramsCause and effect diagrams
Tools to Organize the DataTools to Organize the DataPareto chartsPareto chartsFlow chartsFlow charts
Tools for Identifying ProblemsTools for Identifying ProblemsHistogramHistogramStatistical process control chartStatistical process control chart
44© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 44
Seven Tools for TQM
(c)(c) Cause and Effect DiagramCause and Effect Diagram: A tool that : A tool that identifies process elements (causes) that identifies process elements (causes) that might effect an outcomemight effect an outcome
Figure 6.5Figure 6.5
CauseCause
MaterialsMaterials MethodsMethods
ManpowerManpower MachineryMachinery
EffectEffect
45© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 45
Cause-and-Effect Diagrams
MaterialMaterial MachineryMachinery
MethodsMethods ManpowerManpower
InadequateInadequate
supply of supply of magazinesmagazines
Inadequate special Inadequate special
meals on-boardmeals on-board
Insu
ffic
ien
t In
suff
icie
nt
clea
n p
illo
ws
clea
n p
illo
ws
& b
lan
kets
&
bla
nke
ts
on
-bo
ard
on
-bo
ardBroken luggage Broken luggage
carouselcarousel
Mechanical delay Mechanical delay
on planeon plane
Dei
cin
g
Dei
cin
g
equ
ipm
ent
equ
ipm
ent
no
t av
aila
ble
no
t av
aila
ble
Overbooking policiesOverbooking policies
Bumping policiesBumping policies
Mis
tag
ged
M
ista
gg
ed
bag
sb
ags
Po
or
chec
k-in
P
oo
r ch
eck-
in
po
lici
es
po
lici
es
Understaffed Understaffed
ticket countersticket counters
Understaffed Understaffed
crewcrew
Po
orl
y tr
ain
ed
Po
orl
y tr
ain
ed
atte
nd
ants
atte
nd
ants
Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Airline Airline CustomerCustomer
Figure 6.6Figure 6.6
46© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 46
Tools of TQM Tools for Generating IdeasTools for Generating Ideas
Check sheetsCheck sheetsScatter diagramsScatter diagramsCause and effect diagramsCause and effect diagrams
Tools to Organize the DataTools to Organize the DataPareto chartsPareto chartsFlow chartsFlow charts
Tools for Identifying ProblemsTools for Identifying ProblemsHistogramHistogramStatistical process control chartStatistical process control chart
47© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 47
Seven Tools for TQM
(d)(d) Pareto ChartsPareto Charts: A graph to identify and plot : A graph to identify and plot problems or defects in descending order of problems or defects in descending order of frequencyfrequency
Figure 6.5Figure 6.5
Fre
qu
en
cyF
req
ue
ncy
Pe
rce
nt
Pe
rce
nt
AA BB CC DD EE
48© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 48
Pareto Charts
Number of Number of occurrencesoccurrences
Room svcRoom svc Check-inCheck-in Pool hoursPool hours MinibarMinibar Misc.Misc.72%72% 16%16% 5%5% 4%4% 3%3%
1212
44 33 22
5454
– 100100– 9393– 8888
– 7272
70 70 –
60 60 –
50 50 –
40 40 –
30 30 –
20 20 –
10 10 –
0 0 –
Fre
qu
ency
(n
um
ber
)F
req
uen
cy (
nu
mb
er)
Causes and percentCauses and percent
Cu
mu
lati
ve p
erce
nt
Cu
mu
lati
ve p
erce
nt
Data for OctoberData for October
49© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 49
Tools of TQM Tools for Generating IdeasTools for Generating Ideas
Check sheetsCheck sheetsScatter diagramsScatter diagramsCause and effect diagramsCause and effect diagrams
Tools to Organize the DataTools to Organize the DataPareto chartsPareto chartsFlow chartsFlow charts
Tools for Identifying ProblemsTools for Identifying ProblemsHistogramHistogramStatistical process control chartStatistical process control chart
50© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 50
Seven Tools for TQM
(e)(e) Flow ChartsFlow Charts (Process Diagrams): A chart (Process Diagrams): A chart that describes the steps in a processthat describes the steps in a process
Figure 6.5Figure 6.5
51© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 51
Shipping dock
Storage(4 to 6 hrs)
Quick freeze storage
(60 Mins)
Sealing Weighing Labeling
Flow Charts
Packing and shipping processPacking and shipping process
Packing station
52© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 52
Tools of TQM Tools for Generating IdeasTools for Generating Ideas
Check sheetsCheck sheetsScatter diagramsScatter diagramsCause and effect diagramsCause and effect diagrams
Tools to Organize the DataTools to Organize the DataPareto chartsPareto chartsFlow chartsFlow charts
Tools for Identifying ProblemsTools for Identifying ProblemsHistogramHistogramStatistical process control chartStatistical process control chart
53© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 53
Seven Tools for TQM
(f)(f) HistogramHistogram: A distribution showing the : A distribution showing the frequency of occurrence of a variablefrequency of occurrence of a variable
Figure 6.5Figure 6.5
DistributionDistribution
Repair time (minutes)Repair time (minutes)
Fre
qu
en
cyF
req
ue
ncy
54© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 54
Seven Tools for TQM
(g)(g) Statistical Process Control ChartStatistical Process Control Chart: A chart with : A chart with time on the horizontal axis to plot values of a time on the horizontal axis to plot values of a statisticstatistic
Figure 6.5Figure 6.5
Upper control limitUpper control limit
Target valueTarget value
Lower control limitLower control limit
TimeTime
55© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 55
Statistical Process Control (SPC) Uses statistics and control charts to Uses statistics and control charts to
tell when to take corrective actiontell when to take corrective action
Drives process improvementDrives process improvement
Four key stepsFour key steps Measure the processMeasure the process
When a change is indicated, find the When a change is indicated, find the assignable causeassignable cause
Eliminate or incorporate the causeEliminate or incorporate the cause
Restart the revised processRestart the revised process
56© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 56
An SPC Chart
Upper control limitUpper control limit
Coach’s target valueCoach’s target value
Lower control limitLower control limit
Game numberGame number
| | | | | | | | |
11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99
20%20%
10%10%
0%0%
Plots the percent of free throws missedPlots the percent of free throws missed
Figure 6.7Figure 6.7
57© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 57
Inspection
Involves examining items to see if Involves examining items to see if an item is good or defectivean item is good or defective
Detect a defective productDetect a defective product Does not correct deficiencies in Does not correct deficiencies in
process or productprocess or product It is expensiveIt is expensive
IssuesIssues When to inspectWhen to inspect Where in process to inspectWhere in process to inspect
58© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 58
When and Where to Inspect?
59© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 59
When and Where to Inspect
1.1. At the supplier’s plant while the supplier is At the supplier’s plant while the supplier is producingproducing
2.2. At your facility upon receipt of goods from At your facility upon receipt of goods from the supplierthe supplier
3.3. Before costly or irreversible processesBefore costly or irreversible processes
4.4. During the step-by-step production During the step-by-step production processesprocesses
5.5. When production or service is completeWhen production or service is complete
6.6. Before delivery from your facilityBefore delivery from your facility
7.7. At the point of customer contactAt the point of customer contact
60© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 60
TQM In Services
Service quality is more difficult to Service quality is more difficult to measure than the quality of goodsmeasure than the quality of goods
Service quality perceptions depend Service quality perceptions depend on on Intangible differences between Intangible differences between
productsproducts
Intangible expectations customers Intangible expectations customers have of those productshave of those products
61© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 6 – 61
Determinants of Service Quality
ReliabilityReliability
ResponsivenessResponsiveness
CompetenceCompetence
AccessAccess
CourtesyCourtesy
CommunicationCommunication
CredibilityCredibility
SecuritySecurity
Understanding/ Understanding/ knowing the knowing the customercustomer
TangiblesTangibles