Upload
oswald-barker
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
Leveraging Funds for IDAs: Strategies for Linking to Existing
State Programs
Friday, November 8, 2002State IDA Policy Conference • St. Louis, MO
Carl Rist, Program DirectorCorporation for Enterprise Development
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
Funding Environment
Vast majority of states facing budget deficits.
New funding for IDAs likely to face stiff challenges.
Existing funds in danger of being withdrawn or re-captured.
How can states leverage related sources of funds for IDAs in a time of scarcity?
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
IDAs and Housing
Most common use of IDAs:– 61% of participants in ADD demonstration
intend to save for home purchase or repair.– 80% of participants used IDAs for
homeownership in NC (according to recent evaluation).
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
Options for Leveraging Housing Funds for IDAs
1. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds
2. Federal Home Loan Bank
3. Family Self-Sufficiency Program
4. State Housing Trust Funds
5. Low-Income Housing Tax Credits
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
CDBG Funds
Why CDBG?– One of the largest sources of funds for
community development.– Funds a broad range of c.d. activity.
What CDBG funds can be used for:– Match for first-time homebuyers (or small
business start-up)– Administrative costs
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
CDBG Funds
Models: NC, OK, TN, VA Pros:
– Funds match and admin– Available in every state– Considered non-federal for purposes of matching
federal dollars Cons:
– Regs– Restrictive funding categories– Only small towns and rural areas qualify– Applicants must be unit of local government
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
Federal Home Loan Bank
Why FHLB?– Affordable Housing Program (AHP) –
matched savings program for low-income families.
What FHLB funds:– Up to 3:1 match for downpayment
assistance.
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
Federal Home Loan Bank
Models: Many Cons:
– Have to apply through FHLB member bank
– Account must be held by member bank
Pros:– Good source of funds for downpayment
assistance
– Mortgage does not have to be with member bank
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
HUD Family Self-Sufficiency Program (FSS)
Why FSS?– Structured saving program for public
housing residents with earned income– Many FSS savers have used escrow
accounts to purchase homes
What FSS escrow accounts fund:– Downpayment or other uses.
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
HUD Family Self-Sufficiency Program (FSS)
Models: Many Cons:
– Not additional source of funds– FSS programs also not always well staffed
Pros:– Existing system for structuring saving for
key target population– Economies of scale in linking FSS and
IDAs
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
State Housing Trust Fund
Why Housing Trust Funds?– Own-source stream of funds for states– Dedicated to affordable housing
What Housing Trust Funds fund:– Housing development– Housing rehab– Downpayment assistance– Low-interest financing
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
State Housing Trust Fund
Model: NC DOL-HFA collaboration – “Virtual” match from Housing Trust Fund provides
non-federal match for AFIA grant Pros:
– Source of state funds for asset-building as appropriations and tax credits dry up
– Leverages housing funds at a time when many states are not reinvesting in their Trust Funds
Cons:– Not every state has a Housing Trust Fund– Feds approved NC application, but nothing in writing
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC)
Why LIHTC?– One of most significant sources of funds
for low-income housing development– LIHTC continue to be in great demand on
part of housing developers
What LIHTCs fund:– Housing construction
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC)
Models: None Modest proposal:
– Give extra credit to applicants for LIHTC if they set up IDA programs for their tenants.
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
IDAs and Small Business Development
Second most common use of IDAs:– 18% of participants in ADD demonstration
intend to save for microenterprise or small business start-up.
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
Options for Linking Small Business Development Funds
and IDAs1. Integrating microenterprise
development products and services and IDAs
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
Integrating Micro and IDAs
Why integrate micro and IDAs?– Both share common goals – accumulation
of wealth by poor.
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
Integrating Micro and IDAs
Models: FSCLF in Delaware (“high integration” model); others
Pros:– Minimize program costs (economies of scale) – Establishing ability to save can increase credit-
readiness and credit-worthiness– IDA “equity” valued as a credit enhancement
during consideration for loan Cons:
– Not new money, rather cost savings
© 2002 Corporation For Enterprise Development
123 W. Main St. 3rd Floor Durham, NC 27701
Tel: 919-688-6444 Fax: [email protected]
Website: www.cfed.org Visit the Internet IDA Learning Network at
http://idanetwork.org
Carl RistCorporation for Enterprise Development
THE END