44
© 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

© 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Chapter 13

Material Requirements Planning

Page 2: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 2© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

MRP

• Computerized inventory control & production planning system

• Schedules component items when they are needed - no earlier and no later

Page 3: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 3© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

When to Use MRP

• Dependent and discrete items• Complex products• Job shop production• Assemble-to-order environments

Page 4: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 4© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

MRP Inputs & OutputsMaster Production Schedule

MaterialRequirements

Planning

Planned Order Releases

Work Orders Purchase Orders Rescheduling Notices

ProductStructure

File

InventoryMaster

File

Page 5: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 5© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

MRP Inputs

• Master production schedule

• Product structure file

• Inventory master file

Page 6: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 6© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Master Production Schedule

• Drives MRP process with a schedule of finished products

• Quantities represent production not demand• Quantities may consist of a combination of

customer orders & demand forecasts• Quantities represent what needs to be produced,

not what can be produced

Page 7: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 7© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Master Production ScheduleMPS PeriodItem 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Clipboard 86 93 119 100 100 100 100 100Lapboard 0 50 0 50 0 50 0 50Lapdesk 75 120 47 20 17 10 0 0Pencil Case 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125

Page 8: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 8© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Clipboard

Rivet (2)

Iron Rod

(3 in.)

Spring (1)

Spring Steel

(10 in.)

Level 0

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Bottom Clip (1)

Top Clip (1)

Pivot (1)

Sheet Metal (8 in2)

Clip Assembly (10)

Sheet Metal (8 in2)

Product Structure Tree

Board (1)

Pressboard (1)

Finish (2oz.)

Page 9: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 9© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Indented Bill of MaterialLEVEL ITEM Unit of Measure Quantity0 - - - - Clipboard Ea 1- 1 - - - Clip Assembly Ea 1- - 2 - - Top Clip Ea 1- - - 3 - Sheet Metal In2 8- - 2 - - Bottom Clip Ea 1- - - 3 - Sheet Metal In2 8- - 2 - - Pivot Ea 1- - - 3 - Iron Rod In 3- - 2 - - Spring Ea 1- - - 3 - Spring Steel In 10- 1 - - - Rivet Ea 2- 1 - - - Board Ea 1- - 2 - - Press Board Ea 1- - 2 - - Finish Oz 2

Page 10: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

• Phantom bills– transient subassemblies– never stocked– immediately consumed in next stage

• K-bills– group small, loose parts under pseudoitem #– reduces paperwork

Ch 13 - 10© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Specialized BOMS

Page 11: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 11© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Specialized BOMS

• Modular bills– product assembled from major subassemblies &

customer options– modular bill kept for each major subassembly– simplifies forecasting & planning– X10 Automobile example

3 x 8 x 3 x 8 x 4 = 2,304 configurations3 + 8 + 3 + 8 + 4 = 26 modular bills

Page 12: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

X10

Automobile

Engines Exterior Interior Interior Body

(1 of 3) Color (1 of 8) (1 of 3) Color (1 of 8) (1 of 4)

4-Cylinder (.40) Bright Red (.10) Leather (.20) Grey (.10) Sports Coupe (.20)

6-Cylinder (.50) White Linen (.10) Tweed (.40) Light Blue (.10) Two-Door (.20)

8-Cylinder (.10) Sulphur Yellow (.10) Plush (.40) Rose (.10) Four-Door (.30)

Neon Orange (.10) Off-white (.20) Station Wagon (.30)

Metallic Blue (.10) Cool Green (.10)

Emerald Green (.10) Black (.20)

Jet Black (.20) Brown (.10)

Champagne (.20) B/W Checked (.10)

Ch 13 - 12© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Modular Bill Of Material

Page 13: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 13© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Inventory Master File

Description Inventory PolicyItem Board Lead time 2Item no. 7341 Annual demand 5,000Item type Manuf. Holding cost 1Product/sales class Ass’y Ordering/setup cost 50Value class B Safety stock 25Buyer/planner RSR Reorder point 39Vendor/drawing 07142 EOQ 316Phantom code N Minimum order qty 100Unit price/cost 1.25 Maximum order qty 500Pegging Y Multiple order qty 100LLC 3 Policy code 3

Page 14: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 14© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Inventory Master File, Con’t.

Physical Inventory Usage/SalesOn hand 100 YTD usage/sales 1,100Location W142 MTD usage/sales 75On order 50 YTD receipts 1,200Allocated 75 MTD receipts 0Cycle 3 Last receipt 8/25Difference -2 Last issue 10/5

CodesCost acct. 00754Routing 00326Engr 07142

Page 15: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 15© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Inventory Accuracy1. Maintain orderly stockrooms2. Control access to stockrooms3. Establish & enforce procedures for

inventory withdrawal4. Ensure prompt and accurate entry of inventory

transactions5. Take physical inventory count on a regular basis6. Reconcile inventory discrepancies in a timely

manner (use cycle counting)

Page 16: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 16© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

The MRP MatrixLot size: LT: PD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Gross requirementsScheduled receiptsProjected on handNet requirementsPlanned order receiptsPlanned order releases

• Item – name or number identifying scheduled item

• LLC– low-level-code; lowest level at which item appears in a

product structure

Page 17: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 17© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Parts Of MRP Matrix

• Lot size– order multiples of this qty; can be min/max qty

• LT (lead time)– time from order placement to receipt

• PD (past-due)– orders behind schedule

• Gross requirements – demand for item by time period

Page 18: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 18© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

• Scheduled receipts– quantity already on order & receipt date– released orders become scheduled receipts

• Projected on hand– expected on-hand inventory at end of period

• Net requirements– net amount needed after on-hand adjustments

• Planned order receipts– net requirements adjusted for lot-sizing

• Planned order releases– planned order receipts offset by lead time

Page 19: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 19© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

The Alpha Beta Company

Item On Hand Scheduled Receipts Lot Size MPS

A 10 0 1 100, period 8

B 5 0 1 200, period 6

C 140 0 150 - - -

D 200 250, period 2 250 - - -

ALT=3

C(3)LT=4

D(2)LT=2

D(3)LT=2

BLT=2

Page 20: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 20© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

MRP Matrices For A & BItem: A LLC: 0 PeriodLot size: 1 LT: 3 PD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Gross requirements 100Scheduled receiptsProjected on hand 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 0Net requirements 90Planned order receipts 90Planned order releases 90

Item: B LLC: 0 PeriodLot size: 1 LT: 2 PD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Gross requirements 200Scheduled receiptsProjected on hand 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 0Net requirements 195Planned order receipts 195Planned order releases 195

Page 21: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 21© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

MRP Matrices For C & DItem: C LLC: 1 PeriodLot size: 150 LT: 4 PD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Gross requirements 270Scheduled receiptsProjected on hand 140 140 140 140 140 20 20 20 20Net requirements 130Planned order receipts 150Planned order releases 150

Item: D LLC: 1 PeriodLot size: 250 LT: 2 PD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Gross requirements 585 180Scheduled receipts 250Projected on hand 200 200 450 450 115 185 185 185 185Net requirements 135 65Planned order receipts 250 250Planned order releases 250 250

Page 22: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 22© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Alpha Beta Planned Order Report

Period Item Quantity1 C 1502 D 2503 D 2504 B 1955 A 90

Page 23: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 23© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Item #2740 Date 9-25-02On hand 100 Lead Time 2 weeksOn order 200 Lot size 200Allocated 50 Safety Stock 50

50 9-26 AL 4416 25 25 9-30 AL 4174 25 010-01 GR 6470 50 -5010-08 SR 7542 200 150 Expedite SR 10-110-10 CO 4471 75 7510-15 GR 6471 50 2510-23 GR 6471 25 010-27 GR 6473 50 -50 Release PO 10-13

Date Order No.

GrossReqs.

ScheduledReceipts

ProjectedOn Hand Action

Key: AL = allocated CO = customer orderPO = purchase order WO = work order SR = scheduled receipt GR = gross requirements

Planned Order Report

Page 24: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 24© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

MRP Action Report

Current date: 9-25-02

#2740 10-08 7542 200 Expedite SR 10-1#3616 10-09 Move forward PO 10-7#2412 10-10 Move forward PO 10-5#3427 10-15 Move backward PO 10-25#2516 10-20 7648 100 De-expedite SR 10-30#2740 10-27 200 Release PO 10-13#3666 10-31 50 Release WO 10-24

DateItem Order No. Qty. Action

Page 25: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 25© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Capacity Requirements Planning (CRP)

• Computerized system that projects load from material plan

• Creates load profile

• Identifies underloads and overloads

Page 26: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 26© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Capacity Terms• Load profile

– compares released and planned orders with work center capacity

• Capacity– productive capability; includes utilization and efficiency

• Utilization– % of available working time spent working

Page 27: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 27© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

More Capacity Terms

• Efficiency• Load

– the standard hours of work assigned to a facility• Load percent

– the ratio of load to capacity

Page 28: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 28© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Capacity Requirements PlanningMRP planned

orderreleases

Routingfile

Capacityrequirements

planning

Openorders

file

Load profile foreach machine center

Page 29: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 29© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Calculating Capacity

• 2 copiers, 2 operators• 5 days/wk, 8 hr/day• 1/2 hr meals, 1/2 hr maintenance per day• Efficiency = 100%• Utilization = 7/9 = 87.5%Daily capacity = 2 machines x 2 shifts x 8 hours/shift x

100% efficiency x 87.5% utilization = 28 hours or 1,680 minutes

Page 30: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 30© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Determining Load & Load %

10 5005.2 0.08 5.2+ (500 x 0.08) =45.220 1,00010.6 0.10 10.6+(1,000 x 0.10) =110.630 5,0003.4 0.12 3.4+(5,000 x 0.12) =603.440 10,00011.2 0.14 11.2+(10,000 x 0.14) =1,411.250 2,00015.3 0.10 15.3+(2,000 x 0.10) =215.3

2385.7 minLoad percent = 2,385.7 / 1,680 = 1.42 x 100% = 142%Add another shift:Daily capacity = 2 machines x 3 shifts x 8 hours/shift x 100% efficiency x 87.5% utilization = 42 hours

or 2,520 minutesRevised load percent = 2,385.7 / 2,520 = 0.9467 x 100% = 94.67%

Job Setup Run time Total

# Copies time (min) (min/unit) Time Load

Page 31: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 31© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Initial Load Profile

1 2 3 4 5 6

Time (weeks)

Normalcapacity

Hours ofcapacity

Page 32: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 32© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Adjusted Load Profile

1 2 3 4 5 6

Time (weeks)

Work an extra shift

Push back

Push back

Pull ahead

Overtime

Hours ofcapacity

Page 33: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 33© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Remedies for Underloads

1. Acquire more work

2. Pull work ahead that is scheduled for later time periods

3. Reduce normal capacity

Page 34: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 34© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Remedies for Overloads1. Eliminate unnecessary requirements2. Reroute jobs to alternative machines or work centers3. Split lots between two or more machines4. Increase normal capacity5. Subcontract6. Increase the efficiency of the operation7. Push work back to later time periods8. Revise master schedule

Page 35: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 35© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Splitting OrdersLathes overloaded, shift work to milling

Machine Setup time Run timeLathe 30 min 5 minMill 45 min 10 min

Three options for producing parts1. Produce 100 units on lathe2. Split 50:50 between lathe & mill3. Optimal split between lathe & mill

Page 36: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 36© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Options 1 And 21. Produce 100 units on lathe 30 + 5(100) = 530 min2. Split 50:50 between lathe & mill 30 + 5(50) = 280 min on lathe 45 + 10(50) = 545 min on mill

Job completion time = 545 minutes

Page 37: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 37© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Option 3

3. Optimal split: x on lathe, 100-x on mill30 + 5x = 45 + 10(100-x)5x = 15 + 1000 - 10x15x = 1015

x = 67.66 or 68 units on lathe,(100-x) = 32 units on mill30 + 5(68) = 370 min on lathe45 + 10(32) = 365 min on mill

Job completion time = 370 minutes

Page 38: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 38© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP II)

• Extension of MRP• Plans all resources needed for running a

business• Variations include

– Service Requirements Planning (SRP)– Business Requirements Planning (BRP)– Distribution Requirements Planning (DRP)

Page 39: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 39© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

MRP II Modules

• Forecasting• Customer order entry• Production planning /

master production scheduling

• Product structure / bill-of-material processor

• Inventory control

• Material requirements planning

• Capacity planning• Shop floor control• Purchasing• Accounting• Financial analysis

Page 40: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 40© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

MRP II Flowchart

Feasible?

MarketingPlan

FinancialPlan

BusinessPlan

ProductionPlan

No

moreYes

Page 41: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 41© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Master productionschedule

Material requirementsplanning

Capacity requirementsplanning

Manufacture

InventoryShop floor

control

Purchaseorders

Workorders

Feasible?No

Yes

Feedback

Page 42: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 43© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Problems with MRP

• Material requirements plan is first; capacity is an afterthought

• MRP assumes fixed lead times

• Excessive reporting requirements

Page 43: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 44© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

Prospects for MRP/MRP II• Coordinates company strategy among different functional areas• Responds quickly to what-if? questions at various levels of

detail• BOM processors, purchase modules, & customer order entry

are standard requirements for Manufacturing Information Systems

• Monitors design & vendor quality, & customer service• Builds trust, teamwork, & better decisions• Cash-flow planning & profit/cost projections

Page 44: © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Chapter 13 Material Requirements Planning

Ch 13 - 42© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e

SAP’s ERP Modules