Upload
mavis-joleen-matthews
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
# 1
STATISTICAL ASPECTS OF
COLLECTIONS OF BEES TO
STUDY PESTICIDES
STATISTICAL ASPECTS OF
COLLECTIONS OF BEES TO
STUDY PESTICIDES
N. SCOTT URQUHARTSENIOR RESEARCH SCIENTIST
DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
EMAP Affiliate
SPACE-TIME AQUATIC RESOURCEMODELING and ANALYSIS PROGRAM
(STARMAP)
# 2
STARMAP FUNDINGSTARMAP FUNDINGSpace-Time Aquatic Resources Modeling and Analysis ProgramSpace-Time Aquatic Resources Modeling and Analysis Program
STARMAP FUNDINGSTARMAP FUNDINGSpace-Time Aquatic Resources Modeling and Analysis ProgramSpace-Time Aquatic Resources Modeling and Analysis Program
The work reported here today was developed under the STAR Research Assistance Agreement CR-829095 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Colorado State University. This presentation has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed here are solely those of presenter and STARMAP, the Program he represents. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in these presentation.
This research is funded by
U.S.EPA – Science To AchieveResults (STAR) ProgramCooperativeAgreement
# CR - 829095
# 3
PATH for TODAYPATH for TODAY
CONTEXT: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) + Academic
TOPICS TO CONSIDER:What to Measure = Indicators
Other speakers will address this
Important things to consider in designing a survey
PLAN! , PLAN! , PLAN!
A National or Regional Survey is a Substantial Undertaking
# 4
IMPORTANT THINGS TO CONSIDER IN IMPORTANT THINGS TO CONSIDER IN DESIGNING A SURVEYDESIGNING A SURVEY
IMPORTANT THINGS TO CONSIDER IN IMPORTANT THINGS TO CONSIDER IN DESIGNING A SURVEYDESIGNING A SURVEY
1. Probability Surveys vs Judgment Collections
2. Population Definition
3. Evaluation Units – hives (colonies) or bees
4. Sampling Frames
5. Selecting the Sample Sites
6. Training
7. Collecting the Bees
8. Handling the Collected Bees
9. Quality Assurance
10. Data Management
11. Data Analysis
# 5
1. PROBABILITY SURVEYS versus
JUDGMENT COLLECTIONS
1. PROBABILITY SURVEYS versus
JUDGMENT COLLECTIONS
Specialists Usually Know a Tremendous
Amount About Limited Specific SituationsThis is the way science accumulates knowledge.
But frequently specialists know a lot less about
the overall situation than they think they
do!
An illustration followsSelection of stream segments for spawning studies by
Oregon Department Fisheries and Wildlife
# 6
SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR
SPAWNING STUDIESSPAWNING STUDIES (OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE)(OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE)
SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR
SPAWNING STUDIESSPAWNING STUDIES (OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE)(OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE)
OBJECTIVE: Estimate Number Of Coho Salmon Spawning in Streams of Oregon’s Coast Range
Stream Segments Were Stratified As Being“Low,” “Moderate,” Or “High”, relative to
quality of spawning habitatLow was not sampled; high was sampled at
three times the rate of moderateQuality of spawning habitat was evaluated for
each selected segment
# 7
OBSERVED QUALITYANTICIPATEDQUALITY
LOW MEDIUM HIGH
LOWNOT
SAMPLEDNOT
SAMPLEDNOT
SAMPLED
MEDIUM 73% 17% 10%
HIGH 53% 23% 24%
SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR SPAWNING STUDIES SPAWNING STUDIES
(OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE)(OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE)(continued)(continued)
SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR SPAWNING STUDIES SPAWNING STUDIES
(OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE)(OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE)(continued)(continued)
# 8
SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR SPAWNING STUDIESSPAWNING STUDIES
(OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE)(OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE) continued continued
SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR SELECTION OF STREAM SEGMENTS FOR SPAWNING STUDIESSPAWNING STUDIES
(OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE)(OREGON DEPARTMENT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE) continued continued
EXAMPLE of “Sampling Where
Investigators Think Most of the Large
Responses Are.”Bad idea if “knowledge” isn’t quite right
Even 10% error rate can make this a very inefficient
sampling approach
ODF&W Classification Was Off LOTS
Further Than 10%.Many other such examples exist.
# 9
2. POPULATION DEFINITION DEFINITION2. POPULATION DEFINITION DEFINITION
A Population is the Set of Objects of
Interest in a Survey Commercial hives
Of cooperating beekeepers
All hives
All hives within 500m of a secondary road
SpeciesAll
Two species of primary interest
# 10
POPULATION DEFINITION DEFINITIONcontinuedcontinued
POPULATION DEFINITION DEFINITIONcontinuedcontinued
So What?!Major distinction
Target population = what you want to talk about
Sampled population = what you can talk about
You probably don’t want to talk about this
sort of population:All commercial hives owned by cooperating
beekeepers within 100 miles of an EPA Regional
Office, and within 500m of a paved secondary road
in June, 2005.
Where you go to collect bees does make a
difference!
# 11
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS ABOUT JUDGMENT SELECTED SITESABOUT JUDGMENT SELECTED SITES
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS ABOUT JUDGMENT SELECTED SITESABOUT JUDGMENT SELECTED SITES
Ecologists’ “Typical Sites” Probably Are
Much More Homogeneous Than the Larger
Context of Interest
Nonprobability Samples Can Be Rather
Biased for No Apparent Reason
Typicalness for One Set of Responses Says
NothingNothing About Typicalness for Any Other
Response, i.e. Any Response Not Used in
Determining Typicalness
# 12
3. EVALUATION UNITS – HIVES (COLONIES) OR BEES?3. EVALUATION UNITS – HIVES (COLONIES) OR BEES?
So what?
If Hives (or colonies) Are Your
Evaluation Units, You MustSelect hives in the sampling process
Have a response which can be attached to
a selected hive
Give final answers in terms hivesEx: Proportion of hives (colonies) with yy > xx
# 13
4. SAMPLING FRAMES4. SAMPLING FRAMES
A Sample Frame Provides a Means to
Identify or Locate the Individual Units
in the PopulationMay be a list
The basis for most of the older sampling theory
Often is imperfect! Sometimes, badly so!
Many living things must be selected by
their location
# 14
PLAUSIBLE SPATIAL SAMPLING FRAMES(Courtesy of Tony Olsen, EMAP, US EPA)
PLAUSIBLE SPATIAL SAMPLING FRAMES(Courtesy of Tony Olsen, EMAP, US EPA)
Use 6th Field HUCs as Spatial Units. Select sample of HUCs incorporation landcover/use into
probability of selection. Then find beekeepers within HUC. Sample locations where hives are set up.
Same as Above, Except Ignore Beekeepers. Go out an trap any bees at selected points within HUC -
possibly use landcover again within HUC as selection probability.
Use NRI Sample Points as Frame and Subsample Them. Use NASS Spatial Frame Sample Points and Subsample
Them. Use NLCD (8million pixels).
Select GRTS sample of pixels based on landcover class. Either trap bees or use that the identify if bee hives are present (in some way). Have to do oversample if expect most pixels to not have hives.....
# 15
PLAUSIBLE SPATIAL SAMPLING FRAMES(Courtesy of Tony Olsen, EMAP, US EPA)
PLAUSIBLE SPATIAL SAMPLING FRAMES(Courtesy of Tony Olsen, EMAP, US EPA)
JARGON!!! - means what?HUC = Hydrologic Unit Code
NRI = National Resources Inventory – oriented toward soil erosion (Iowa State U)
NASS = National Agricultural Statistical Survey
NLCD = National Land Cover Data
GRTS = Generalized Randomized Tessellation StratifiedVERY promising approach – provides easy and
defensible way to accommodate access denials, etc
# 16
PLAUSIBLE SPATIAL SAMPLING FRAMES(Courtesy of Tony Olsen, EMAP, US EPA)
Where to Find Info
PLAUSIBLE SPATIAL SAMPLING FRAMES(Courtesy of Tony Olsen, EMAP, US EPA)
Where to Find Info
JARGON!!! - where to find out more about
the content the jargon representsHUC: http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/huc.html
NRI: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/NRI/
NASS: http://www.usda.gov/nass/
NLCD: http://www.epa.gov/mrlc/nlcd.html
GRTS: http:oregonstate.edu/dept/statistics
epa_program/docs/
spatial_balance_imperfect_frame.pdf
# 17
A PLAUSIBLE SPATIAL SAMPLING FRAMEHydrologic Units
A PLAUSIBLE SPATIAL SAMPLING FRAMEHydrologic Units
Level 1 – “Two digit” 21 major geographic areas, or regions
Level 2 – “Four Digit” divides the 21 regions into 222
subregions
Level 3 – “Six Digit” 352 hydrologic accounting units
Level 4 – “Eight Digit” There are 2150 Cataloging Units in the
Nation
# 18
5. SELECTING THE SAMPLE SITES5. SELECTING THE SAMPLE SITES
There are Lots of Ways to Select
Collection Sites – Depending OnObjectives
Sampling Frame
Units chosen (hives or bees)
Possible stratification factors
# 19
SELECTING THE SAMPLE SITEScontinued
SELECTING THE SAMPLE SITEScontinued
One Which Has Come Out of the EMAP Experience:Generalized Randomized Tessellation
Stratified (GRTS) SamplingIt allows
Spatially distributed sites Variable sampling rates – depending factors of interest A well-defined means for adding sites to accommodate
problems like access denial
Implemented in several computational contexts Using GIS, or Statistical software
# 20
6. TRAINING6. TRAINING
Data Cannot Be Combined Across Areas,
etc Unless It is Comparable Across Those
Same Features
IMPLICATION: Good Training is Critical to
Assure Consistent ProceduresVarious plausible contingencies must be
identified in advance, and
Plans made for how they should be dealt with
# 21
7. COLLECTING THE BEES7. COLLECTING THE BEES
Make Sure Field Crews Follow the
Collection ProtocolsBe sure collection times don’t collide with
fair labor laws
Does a federal employee need to be a
member of each field crew?For safety purposes, crews may need to have at
least two members
Collect the Bees As Planned
# 22
8. HANDLING THE COLLECTED BEES8. HANDLING THE COLLECTED BEES
Ship the Collected Material to the
Appropriate Labs, According to
Specified ProtocolsNeed ice?
Consider crew logistics, likehousing, transportation, permits, location of
shipping point, availability of shipping point by
day of the week
Plan for custody of the collected material
# 23
9. QUALITY ASSURANCE9. QUALITY ASSURANCE
EPA has Stringent Quality Assurance
(QA) ProcessesApproval of a QA plan may take several
monthsPlan for that
Implication: Indicator(s) needs to be
chosen early in the process
# 24
10. DATA MANAGEMENT10. DATA MANAGEMENT
This Will Be a Much Larger Effort Than
You May ExpectThis has a QA component, too
20 – 30% of resources! Not 5%!
The collected information becomes part of
the public record. You need to plan to make it available to various
interested parties!
# 25
11. DATA ANALYSIS11. DATA ANALYSIS
Plan Intended Summaries from the
Beginning
Record and keep track of all of the
design information,Like the rate at which various kinds of sites
were selected
Consider making estimated cumulative
distribution functions (cdf) a major part of
the survey summary
# 27
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION (cdf) OF SECCHI DEPTH, EMAP AND “DIP-IN”(cdf) OF SECCHI DEPTH, EMAP AND “DIP-IN”
ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION ESTIMATED CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION (cdf) OF SECCHI DEPTH, EMAP AND “DIP-IN”(cdf) OF SECCHI DEPTH, EMAP AND “DIP-IN”
Use cdfs – tails often are of interest
Confidence bounds
Misinformation from convenience data
# 28
END OF PREPARED TALKEND OF PREPARED TALKEND OF PREPARED TALKEND OF PREPARED TALK
QUESTIONS ARE WELCOME