~-1) review of intellectual property and competition...Published by the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law,Munich Online and lts Effect on the "Goods"

Published by the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Munichwww.ip.mpg.de

Online and lts Effect on the "Goods" Versus "Services" DistinctionT.Dreier 137

ARTICLES

Managing Intellectual Property Rights Over Clinical Trial Data to Prornote Accessand Benefit Sharing in Public HealthP.Andanda 140

Comparison of the First Requirement of the Doctrine of Equivalents BetweenKorea and JapanD.Koo 178

Proposals for Streamlining the Filing Date Requirements of the EuropeanPatent ConventionC.Mulder· D.Visser 220

DECISION

Interim interdict - Public Interest cannot be Ignored - Relationship betweenpatent rights and right to health - 11Aventis Pharma SA& Ors. v. Cipla Life Sciences"South Africa - Supreme Court of AppealComment by E.K.Oke

EDITORlAL

~ Springer

Volume 44· Number 2· March 2013

International Review ofIntellectual Property and Competition Law

~-1)Q9l~Verlag C. H. Beek

PlJblis~b'y Ih! MaKPianck InstillJte ror InleUectlJal Property and Competrtion tew, Mun,chwww.ip.mQs·t1e

Japan"Right to Be Heard in Patent ExamGroup v. The Commissioner of the PDecision of the Intellectual Property

Japan"Novelty - AIIElements Rule" . PalDecision of the Intellectual Property I

Japan"Misappropriation of Prior Art" •PMachine Industry Co.Ltd.Decision of the Intellectual Property I

South Africa"Aventis Pharma SA & Ors. v. Cipla(as amended) - Aventis Pharma SADecision of the Supreme Court of Ap:

Volume 44 • Number 2 • March 2013

EDITORlAL

Online and lts Effect on the "Goods" Versus "Services" DistinctionT.Dreier 137

ARTICLES

Managing Intellectual Property Rights Over Clinical Trial Data to PromoteAccess and Benefit Sharing in Public HealthP.Andanda 140

DECISION . TRADE MARK AND DESIGN LA

,4

European Union"Seated Figure" • Council Regulati(Designs, Arts. 4-9, 25(1 )(b) and (e),Office for Harmonisation in the Inte,Manuel Baena Grupo, SADecision of the Court of Justice (Sixthand C-l02/11 P 248

Comparison of the First Requirement of the Doctrine of Equivalents BetweenKorea and JapanD.Koo 178

Proposals for Streamlining the Filing Date Requirements of the EuropeanPatent ConventionC. Mulder· D.Visser 220 BOOK REVIEW

DECISIONS' PATENT LAW Dev Gangjee: Relocating the LawO'

Press, 2012. pp. xvii + 341. ISBN:97P.S.Morris 255France

"Device for Mounting the Rear Shelf of a Car" • Intellectual Property Code,Art. L.614(3) - Trèves SAv. Silac SAS,Simoldes Plasticos France SARLet Renault SASDecision of the Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) . 18 October 2011 231

Germany"Pipe Cleaning Nozzle 11" (Rohrreinigungsdüse 11) • Code of Civil Procedure,Sec. 253(2) No. 2; Patent Act, Secs. 9,139Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) . 21 February 2012 - CaseNo.XZR111/09 232

Germany"Tube System" (Sondensystem). Patent Act, Secs. 59, 61(1) second sentence, 101Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) . 26 June 2012 - CaseNo. XZB4/11 239

I Data to Promote

Japon"Right to Be Heard in Patent Examination Appeal" . Patent Act, Secs. 50, 159(2) - HaierGroup v. The Commissioner of the Potent OfficeDecision of the Intellectual Property High Court· 4 October 2011 241

Japon"Novelty - AUElements Rule" • Patent Act, Sec. 29(1) - Tohr GmbH v. Rohm & Hoos Co., Ltd.Decision of the Intellectual Property High Court· 24 October 2011 242

Japon"Misappropriation of Prior Art" • Patent Act Sec. 123(1 )(vi) - Kato Mfg Co. Ltd. v. TsukasaMachine Industry Co. Ltd.Decision of the Intellectual Property High Court· 10 November 2011 243

South Africo"Aventis Pharma SA & Ors. v. Cipla Life Sciences"· Patents Act, No. 57 of 1978(as amended) - Aventis Pharma SA & Ors. v. Cipla Life SciencesDecision of the Supreme Court of Appeal . 26 July 2012 - [2012] ZASCA 108 244

)istinction

DECISION· TRADE MARK AND DESIGN LAW

of the European

Europeon Union"Seated Figure" . Council Regulation (EC)No. 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on CommunityDesigns, Arts. 4-9,25(1 )(b) and (e), 61 - Herbert Neuman, Andoni Galdeano del Sel, andOffice for Harmonisation in the Internol Morket (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v. JoséManuel8aena Grupo, SADecision of the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) . 18 October 2012 - Joined CasesC-101/11 Pand C-102/11 P 248

Equivalents Between

BOOKREVIEW

Dev Gangjee: Relocating the Law of Geographicallndications . Cambridge UniversityPress, 2012. pp. xvii + 341. ISBN: 978-0-521-19202-6. €91.38P.S.Morris 255

al Property Code,rance SARLet Renault SASer 2011 231

of CivilProcedure,

·21 February 2012 - CaseNo.

(1) second sentence, 101·26 June 2012 - Case

Documents

~-1) review of intellectual property and competition...Published by the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law,Munich Online and lts Effect on the "Goods"