32
The Social Impact of Trade and Migration Page 1 of 32 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy ). Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015 Subject: Archaeology, Archaeology of Africa, Egyptian Archaeology, Identity and Ethnicity, Production, Trade, and Exchange Online Publication Date: Nov 2015 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935413.013.37 The Social Impact of Trade and Migration: The Western Desert in Pharaonic and Post-Pharaonic Egypt Anna Lucille Boozer Oxford Handbooks Online Abstract and Keywords Egypt’s Western Desert is located on the fringes of Egypt proper. Despite its remote location, the Western Desert inhabitants connected with people in the Nile Valley and more distant locations. These connections are visible in the form of trade, technology, and migration. In order to understand the impact of this connection with other regions upon local oasites, this article offers a critique of current theories on migration and consumption before reviewing the evidence of such connections chronologically. The available evidence suggests that the Old Kingdom, the New Kingdom, the Perisan Period, and the Roman Period may have been particularly prominent periods of connectivity for the Western Desert. This evidence also suggests strong connections to Thebes throughout most of the history of the Western Desert. Since formal research in the Western Desert is relatively recent, it is anticipated that the current image of Western Desert connections will change in future years. Keywords: trade, transportation, migration, Egypt, connectivity, Western Desert, oasis, social archaeology Introduction The movement of peoples, objects, and ideas is critical to our understanding of the flow and route of human history. Evidence of such movements is particularly abundant in Egypt. These movements—be they migratory, colonizing, or imperialistic—linked Egypt to the Mediterranean, Africa, western Asia, and regions further afield. Small-scale movements within Egypt itself also had a critical place in the formation of Egyptian identities. This article focuses upon migration and trade in Egypt’s Western Desert, which is located on the fringes of Egypt proper. Despite its remote location, the Western Desert inhabitants connected with people in the Nile Valley and more distant locations. These connections are visible in the form of trade, technology, and migration. In order to understand the impact of this connection with other regions upon local oasites, this article offers a critique of current theories on migration and consumption before reviewing the evidence of such connections chronologically. The available evidence suggests that the Old Kingdom, the New Kingdom, the Perisan Period, and the Roman Period may have been particularly prominent periods of connectivity for the Western Desert. From at least the late Old Kingdom (ca. 2500 BC) the indigenous peoples of the Western Desert were subject to military occupation and potentially colonization from the Nile Valley. Walled towns populated with individuals recruited from the Nile Valley constituted the fabric of these occupying peoples. We have documentary sources mentioning the oases dating from the Old Kingdom (ca. 2649–2150 BC) and continuing for many thousands of years. Within these documentary sources, probable migration to the region is detectable, particularly during the New Kingdom (ca. 1550–1070 BC) and the Roman Period (ca. 30 BC–641 AD). For example, during the Roman Period, we know the location of Roman fortresses from the Notitia Dignitatum as well as the corresponding archaeological evidence of fortified areas and settlements (Boozer 2013). Yet, when we explore the individuals who lived in and around these areas over time, we

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration: The Western Desert in Pharaonic and Post-Pharaonic Egypt

  • Upload
    baruch

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 1 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Subject: Archaeology,ArchaeologyofAfrica,EgyptianArchaeology,IdentityandEthnicity,Production,Trade,andExchange

OnlinePublicationDate: Nov2015

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935413.013.37

TheSocialImpactofTradeandMigration:TheWesternDesertinPharaonicandPost-PharaonicEgypt AnnaLucilleBoozer

OxfordHandbooksOnline

AbstractandKeywords

Egypt’sWesternDesertislocatedonthefringesofEgyptproper.Despiteitsremotelocation,theWesternDesertinhabitantsconnectedwithpeopleintheNileValleyandmoredistantlocations.Theseconnectionsarevisibleintheformoftrade,technology,andmigration.Inordertounderstandtheimpactofthisconnectionwithotherregionsuponlocaloasites,thisarticleoffersacritiqueofcurrenttheoriesonmigrationandconsumptionbeforereviewingtheevidenceofsuchconnectionschronologically.TheavailableevidencesuggeststhattheOldKingdom,theNewKingdom,thePerisanPeriod,andtheRomanPeriodmayhavebeenparticularlyprominentperiodsofconnectivityfortheWesternDesert.ThisevidencealsosuggestsstrongconnectionstoThebesthroughoutmostofthehistoryoftheWesternDesert.SinceformalresearchintheWesternDesertisrelativelyrecent,itisanticipatedthatthecurrentimageofWesternDesertconnectionswillchangeinfutureyears.

Keywords:trade,transportation,migration,Egypt,connectivity,WesternDesert,oasis,socialarchaeology

Introduction

Themovementofpeoples,objects,andideasiscriticaltoourunderstandingoftheflowandrouteofhumanhistory.EvidenceofsuchmovementsisparticularlyabundantinEgypt.Thesemovements—betheymigratory,colonizing,orimperialistic—linkedEgypttotheMediterranean,Africa,westernAsia,andregionsfurtherafield.Small-scalemovementswithinEgyptitselfalsohadacriticalplaceintheformationofEgyptianidentities.ThisarticlefocusesuponmigrationandtradeinEgypt’sWesternDesert,whichislocatedonthefringesofEgyptproper.Despiteitsremotelocation,theWesternDesertinhabitantsconnectedwithpeopleintheNileValleyandmoredistantlocations.Theseconnectionsarevisibleintheformoftrade,technology,andmigration.Inordertounderstandtheimpactofthisconnectionwithotherregionsuponlocaloasites,thisarticleoffersacritiqueofcurrenttheoriesonmigrationandconsumptionbeforereviewingtheevidenceofsuchconnectionschronologically.

TheavailableevidencesuggeststhattheOldKingdom,theNewKingdom,thePerisanPeriod,andtheRomanPeriodmayhavebeenparticularlyprominentperiodsofconnectivityfortheWesternDesert.FromatleastthelateOldKingdom(ca.2500BC)theindigenouspeoplesoftheWesternDesertweresubjecttomilitaryoccupationandpotentiallycolonizationfromtheNileValley.WalledtownspopulatedwithindividualsrecruitedfromtheNileValleyconstitutedthefabricoftheseoccupyingpeoples.WehavedocumentarysourcesmentioningtheoasesdatingfromtheOldKingdom(ca.2649–2150BC)andcontinuingformanythousandsofyears.Withinthesedocumentarysources,probablemigrationtotheregionisdetectable,particularlyduringtheNewKingdom(ca.1550–1070BC)andtheRomanPeriod(ca.30BC–641AD).Forexample,duringtheRomanPeriod,weknowthelocationofRomanfortressesfromtheNotitiaDignitatumaswellasthecorrespondingarchaeologicalevidenceoffortifiedareasandsettlements(Boozer2013).Yet,whenweexploretheindividualswholivedinandaroundtheseareasovertime,we

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 2 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

detectamixtureofinfluencesandfewoverwhelmingsignsofmigrantoriginsinthelocalpopulations.

TherearetwoadditionalissuesthatcomplicateastudyofconnectionsbetweentheWesternDesertandexternalregions.First,peripheralareasoftenexperienceinfluxesofnewgoodsandpeoplesindiscretephasesratherthanasteadystream.Asteadystreamofmigrantsismoretypicalofcentralizedandurbanareas.TheconnectionsbetweenthedesertandtheNileValley,aswellastoareasfurtherafield,waxedandwanedthroughoutthehistoryoftheWesternDesert.Thisintermittentconnectioncanbetracedthroughmaterialcultureanddocumentarysources.ThesomewhatepisodiccontrolEgypthadovertheoasessawchangingpatternsofsystemicencouragementofmigrationtotheWesternDesert.Meanwhile,Egypt“proper”wentthroughitsowntransformationswithperiodsofgreaterandlessermigrationsofnon-Egyptianstoandfromvariousregions,andparticularlyintheNileDelta.

Second,theWesternDesertpeoplesthemselveswerenothomogeneous.Notonlywerethesedentarypeoplessubjecttowavesofmigrationoverthousandsofyears,buttheyalsosharedtheirlandwithnomadicandseminomadicpeoples.Wealsoshouldconsiderthepossibilityofoasispeoplesthemselves(sedentary,seminomadic,andnomadic)movingelsewhereintheNileValleyorbeyond.Insum,theavailableevidencesuggestsconsiderablemovementandshiftingofavarietyofpeopleswithintheoases.

Althoughwecannotresolvethesecomplexitiesatthisstageofresearch,thefollowingpagesdemonstratethatwecandetectpatternsinmigration,trade,andtechnology.ThesepatternswillhelpscholarstoformhypothesesfortestingquestionsofconnectivityinfutureresearchinEgypt’sWesternDesert.

TheoriesaboutMigration

Intoengagewithcurrentdebatesinmigration,itisworthwhilereviewingthehistoryofmigrationstudies.Migrationhasbeenakeycomponentofarchaeologicalstudiessinceatleastthefirsthalfofthetwentiethcentury,whentherewasaparticularfocusonprehistory(Childe1950).ScholarsoftheancientMediterraneanhaveconsideredmigrationtobeakeycomponenttoitsdevelopmentforaverylongtime,althoughearlystudiestookmigrationasagivenratherthananalyzingmigrationinitsownright(e.g.,Rostovtzeff1926–1928).Afterahiatusofseveraldecades,academicresearchresumedinthe1980s.Thesestudiesalsoemphasizedprehistory(e.g.,Rouse1986).Morerecently,scholarshaveaddressedmigrationasymptoticallybyemployingconceptssuchasconnectivity(e.g.,HordenandPurcell2000;vanDommelenandKnapp2010)andcolonialism(e.g.,vanDommelen2012)aswellasmoredirectlyasmobilityandmigration(VanDommelen2014).Therenewedtheoreticalinterestinmigrationhasfocusedprimarilyonprehistoricandpost-Romanperiods(c.f.Anthony1990;Burmeister2000;Frachetti2011;Hackenbeck2008;Härke1998),butsomeexceptionsdooccur(seelaterdiscussion).

Migrationisapresent-dayconcernwithinmanynations.Asaresult,contemporaryviewsofrecentmigrationsdominateacademicdiscoursetodayandhavemademigrationstudiesanemergentfieldinitsownright(e.g.,Eltisetal.1999;Orser1998;Wilkie2004).Oflate,scholarshaverecognizedthatitisimportanttobreakdowndisciplinarybarriersbetweenscientificandhumanities-basedresearchinordertoattainaricherportraitofmigrationintheancientworld(seepapersinEckardt2010).Forexample,thereisgreatpotentialincombiningdemographic,epigraphic,stylistic,isotopic,andosteologicaldatatobearonquestionsofmobility(e.g.,Eckardtetal.2010).Althoughnewscientificapproachessuggesttantalizingcluesastotheoriginsofmigrants,fewregionshavebeensubjectedtothesetechniquessystematically.TheWesternDesertisoneregionthatawaitsasuiteofnewapproachestophysicalhumanremains.Asaresult,thepresentstudyexploresthenuancesofethnicaffinity(seeDerksandRoymans2009;Jones1997)lessthanidentifyingthesourceofincomersandtheirinteractionswiththelocalpopulationsinthearchaeologicalrecord.

Theterms“ethnicaffinity”and“culture”arenotwithouttheirownpitfalls.ManyearlyscholarsofAfricanAmericanorCaribbeangroupsfocusedontheidentificationof“Africanisms,”“survivals,”or“retentions”ofculturaltraitsthattheythoughtcouldbetracedtothegroup’sorigins(Kahn1994:246).Suchapproachesmakeassumptionsaboutthestaticnatureofculture,oversimplifytheprocessofculturalinteraction,andaredevoidofculturalcontext(Jamieson1995).Moreover,asAnthonystates,“culturesdon’tmigrate;peopledo”(Anthony1997).Amoreflexiblereadingofethnicaffinityisrequiredinordertoallowforindividualagencyaswellaschangeovertimeamongthegroup.

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 3 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Morerecentworkincreasinglyexploresthenatureofculturalchangeandhowthisidentityexpressionoccursalongwithprocessesofcreolization,migration,anddiaspora.Diasporacommunitiesarecharacterizedbyaninitialdispersal,whichmaybeforcedorvoluntary,adistinctionfromthehostsociety,andacontinuoussocialorspirituallinktothehomeland(Lilley2004:291).WhiletheAfricanslaveandtheJewishdiasporashavedominatedresearch,twoadditionalareasofstudy,tradeandcolonialdiasporas,haspotentialrelevanceforthepresentwork.Ontheonehand,tradediasporasare“nationsofsociallyinterdependent,butspatiallydispersed,communities”whosemembersaredistinctfromboththesocietiesinwhichtheyoriginatedandthoseinwhichtheylive(Cohen2008).Tradediasporasimfluenceboththeflowofhumanlifeandoftradegoods.Ontheotherhand,colonialismstudiesfocusontheindigenouspeopleswhoexperienceinfluxesofoutsidersratherthanjustthemigrantsthemselves.Thischangeinfocusiscriticalsincelocalpeoplesalsochangedasaresultofpopulationmovements.

Intheactionofmovementanddisplacement,diasporiccommunitiesexperiencetheprocessofcreolizationthatoccurswhendifferentculturesinteract.Althoughtheymaydefinethemselvesintermsoftheirconnectionwiththehomeland,theprocessofrelocationandinteractionrendersmigrantsdistinctfromtheirrealorimaginedoriginalsociety.Researchersareonlyjustbeginningtoexpandtheirdiscussionofdiasporatoincludethe“homeland”andtoexplorehowtheforcedorvoluntarydisplacementofpeopleaffectedboththehomeanddiasporacommunities(Kelly2004).

Ethnicityandlocalityarenottheonlyvectorstoconsiderwhenexaminingmigrants.Professions,status,andtheimpactofinteractions(assimilation,integration,resistance)betweenimmigrantandhostcommunitiesarealsocritical(Eckardtetal.2010:124).Forexample,amigrant’smilitaryrole,slavestatus,ororiginmaybemorepronouncedthanhisorherethnicidentity.Likewise,genderandagecanbecriticalfactorsforexamination,althoughwomenandchildrenhavebeenexploredaspotentialmigrantsonlyrecently(Cool2010;Eckardtetal.2010;Boozerforthcoming).

InancientEgypt,researchintomigrationhasreliedprimarilyupondocumentaryandpictorialsources(e.g.,Baines1996),althoughsomescholarshavediscussedarchaeologicalremains(e.g.,Smith1995,2003,2007;Stevenson2008).Inparticular,“nomadic”groupshavebeenexploredwithincreasingnuanceinrecentyears(seepapersin:BarnardandDuistermaat2012;BarnardandWendrich2008).Bader’srecentwork(Bader2012)showsrenewedinterestinmigrationduringpharaonicEgypt,butsheoftenfillsdatagapswithevidencefromerasandregionsfarbeyondthescopeoftheregionandperiodexamined.Stevenson’srecentworkreanalyzingtheNaqadanculturalsiteofel-Gerzehurgesthatmigrationbedemonstratedbyanalyzingbothmaterialgoodsandthewaysinwhichpeoplesusedthesegoods(Stevenson2008).Thisapproachcombinesarchaeologiesofmaterialitywithconsumptionstudies.Thisisthemodelemployedinthepresentwork.

TheoriesaboutConsumption

AlthoughwelacksubstantialwrittensourcesabouttheimportandexportofgoodstotheWesternDesert,thearchaeologicalrecordisrichwithcluesabouttradeandmigration.Evidenceofnewtypesoffood,technologies,crops,andimportedgoodscombinedwithnewformsofsettlementpatternsdemonstratethatmigrationandtradeplayedcentralrolesinshapinglifeintheWesternDesert.

Theextenttowhichmaterialculturecanbelinkedtodistinctpopulationsorethnicgroupshasbeenasubjectofarchaeologicaldebateforalongtime.Forexample,Hodderhasarguedthattradeandexchangemayberesponsiblefornewtypesofmaterialculture,ratherthanmigration,unlessotherevidencecanbebroughttobear(Hodder1978,1982).Conversely,Fulfordhasarguedthatsomeceramic“imports”mayreflectthemovementofpottersintoRomanBritainratherthantheimportofthesegoods(Fulford2010).IntheabsenceofmakingcleardifferentiationsofpeoplesthroughchemicalorDNAanalysisofskeletalremainsordeterminingceramicimportsthroughclaysourcing,itisdifficulttoresolvethesedebateswithcertainty.

Withinthepresentwork,Iplaceanemphasisonusageratherthansimplythegoodsthemselvesbecausethewaysinwhichpeopleusedobjectscanberevealing.Consumptionhasemergedasatopicinarchaeologicalstudiesthatareassociatedwithanincreasedinterestinexploringthemultifacetedroleofobjects(Meskell2004;Pyburn1998;seeMullins2011foracomprehensiveoverviewofconsumptionstudiesinarchaeology).Essentially,consumptionentailstheselection,adoption,anduseofgoods,aswellastheknow-howrequiredforusingthesegoods.Consumptionaccountsforthedrivefoundinbothindividualsandsocietiestohavemediatingmaterialsforrelating

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 4 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

tootherpeople(DouglasandIsherwood1996[1979]:viii–xiv).Thismediatingrolemeansthatconsumptionisanintegralcomponentofmigrationandtrade.

WecanexploreconsumptionbothwithintheWesternDesertandareasexternaltoit.MaterialgoodsfromtheoasisregionweredistinctivethroughoutEgyptianhistory,whichmadesomeofthesegoodsparticularlyprized.Themajorityofoasisgoodsappeartohavebeenagriculturalproducts,andtheemphasisuponthesegoodsfluctuatedovertime.Forexample,winewasalong-standingcommodity,whilecottonappearedunderRomanrule.Unfortunately,itisalsoclearthatnotalloasitegoodsarerecognizabletoarchaeologists.Archaeologyintheoasesisarecentdevelopmentandsospecialistshadnocomparandaforrecognizingoasiswareswithinpreviouslyanalyzedassemblages.Asaresult,itislikelythatthereareadditionaloasitegoodsthathavebeenoverlookedintheanalysesofmaterialbeyondtheoases.

Meanwhile,connectionswiththeNileValleycanbefoundinimportswithintheoases.ItisalsopossiblethatcraftspeoplemovedtothewesterndesertandproducedcraftscommonlyassociatedwithvariousregionswithinEgypt“proper,”muchasFulfordsuggestedforRomanBritain.Likewise,cropswereintroducedtotheregionthatwouldhaverequiredthepresenceofindividualswhoknewhowtogrow,harvest,andusesuchcrops.Cotton,mostlikelyintroducedfromSudan,isonesuchcrop.

Theimportanceofnew,specializedknowledgeaboutcultivation,preparation,anduseofgoodscanbeseenasanimportantindexofconnectionsbetweenregions.Thematerialobjectsaswellasindividualexpertiseprovidecluesaboutthepeoplewhomadetheseconnectionspossible.

GeographyoftheWesternDesert

Clicktoviewlarger

Figure1 MapofEgypt(M.Matthews)

FromthePharaonictoRomanPeriods,thebasicgeographiccompassconstitutingEgyptwastheNileValley,whichterminatesintheDelta,andtheFayum(Figure1).InadditiontothisprincipalareaweretheEasternDesertandtheoasesoftheWesternDesertaswellasthefringesofEgypt,suchastheWesternDesertbeyondtheoasesandNubia.Egyptproperincorporatedthesemarginalzonesduringtimesofprosperitybutoftenlostcontrolofthemduringperiodsofinsecurity.TheWesternDesertcomprisestwo-thirdsofthelandwithinthecurrentboundariesofEgypt.Theprimaryharborsfromthisharshenvironmentarethefiveoases:Siwa,Bahariya,Farafra,Dakhleh,andKharga.InArabic,DakhlehmeanstheInnerOasisandKhargameanstheOuterOasis(thatiswithrespecttothedesert,ratherthantheNile).ThesetwooasesweregroupedtogetherastheOasisMajor(“theGreatOasis”)(Figure2).

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 5 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Clicktoviewlarger

Figure2 MapoftheGreatOasis(M.Matthews)

ClimaticconditionsintheWesternDesertareunforgiving.Thesouthernhalfofthisdesertisoneofthedriestregionsonearth,withalmostnorain.ThepresenceofoasesintheWesternDesertmakessedentarylifepossibleinthisaridregion,withtheexceptionoftheQattaraDepressionbecausethesubterraneanwateristoosalty.ThewaterthatformstheoasesderivesfromtheArtesian-watersandstoneunderlyingtheoasisandtheentireWesternDesert(SchildandWendorf1977:10).Asanemblemoftheirsignificance,wellshavealwaysbeentherealmeasureofwealthandimportanceintheoases(Giddy1987;Mills1998).Eventoday,wellownershipisacomplexandimportantissue.Itispossibletoowncollectiveand/orindividualsharesofwells.Equallypossibleareindividualswhoownwaterbutnolandorlandbutnowater(Beadnell1909:10).

Thesand-ladenwindswereasignificantobstacleinantiquity.Thewindshavesdowncrops,fillsinhouses,anddepositsdunesoverpavedroads.MostscholarsofantiquityarefamiliarwiththefamousstoryinHerodotusofCambyses’army,whichwasengulfedbythesewindsduringacampaignacrossthedeserttoattacktheOracleatSiwa(BookIII.26).Thetemperaturesarealsoextreme.Inthewintertheyrangefrom0º–2ºCjustbeforesunriseto20º–25ºCbymidday.Inthesummermaximumtemperaturesreachabove40ºCforextendedperiods(Giddy1987:3).

MigrationandTradeintheWesternDesert:ADiachronicPerspective

Predynastic

Theoaseshavesubstantialquantitiesofprehistoricmaterial(Table1).TheDakhlehOasiswasclearlyanimportantlocaleinthehistoryofsettlementinEgypt(McDonald2001a;2001b;Riemer2006).Khargaalsohadanimportantroleinprehistory(Caton-ThompsonandGardner1952;WendorfandSchild1980;Wiseman1999).RecentresearchsuggeststhatKhargamayhavebeenanintegralconnectionpointbetweenthepredynasticculturesoftheNileValleyandSaharanpastoralistsduringaphaseofincreasingaridificationofthedesert(Brioisetal.2012).Sheepandgoats,seeminglyintroducedfromsouthwesternAsia,canbefoundinDakhlehandFarafrafromthefifthmillenniumBConward(earlierthantheNileValley)(Hassan2002:201–203;WendorfandSchild2001:623–625,634–635,663).Althoughceramictechnologyandcattledomestication(bothca.7600BC)weretwoadditionalearlydevelopmentsintheWesterndesert,thedatesforthesechangesandtheoriginsofthesedevelopmentsarenotuniversallyaccepted(e.g.,Grigson2000).

Table1SummaryofTradeandMigrationEvidencefromEgypt’sWesternDesert

Period Date Oases SiteNames Comments

Predynastic 5thmillenium–2575BC

Dakhleh,Kharga,Farafra

Sheepandgoat(SWAsia),Ceramictechnologyandcattledomestication,petroglyphs,movementofNileValleyEgyptiansintoDesert

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 6 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

OldKingdom 2575–2137BC

Kharga(DesertRoad),Dakhleh

W.ofTunadaba,Balat,AinAsil,Qilael-Dabba,Mutel-Kharab,andadditionalsatellitesites

Movementofdesertpatrolsortradeexpeditionsthroughtheoases;CeramicimportstoDakhleh;NileValleyEgyptianoutpostsinDakhleh;NileValleyEgyptiancampsitesinKharga

FirstIntermediatePeriod

ca.2181–2055BC

Kharga GirgaRoad EmergenceofThebesasanimportantlocalefortheWesternDesert;importanceofroutesthroughtheoases

MiddleKingdom

ca.2030–1640BC

Kharga,areaseastofKharga,Dakhleh,Bahariya

AbuZiyâr,GebelGhueitaandKomHefaw,Tunadaba

Importanceofoasesforagriculturalandtradesecurity;oasiswine;foreignmercenaries(Nubian,Asiatic,NileValleyEgyptian);supplydepots;outpostsandburialgrounds;Thebesremainssignificant

SecondIntermediatePeriod

ca.1650–1550BC

Bahariya ThebancontroloveralloasesexceptforpossiblyBahariya,whichwasunderHyksosrule(?)

NewKingdom

ca.1550–1070BC

Kharga HibisTemple Thebancontrolsignificant;tombscenes;demandforoasisgoods(olives,dates,wine,mats,foxhides)andoasitefemaledancers;outpostsandpatrolroutes;employmentofLibyansinoases

ThirdIntermediatePeriod

ca.1070–712BC

Dakhleh Amheida,Mutel-Kharab Amnestygiventooasisexiles;Shamintribe/LibyansincontrolofDakhleh

LatePeriod 714–332BC

Kharga,eastofKharga,Dakhleh

HibisTemple,Qasrel-Ghuieta,AynManawir,Dush,Trimithis

ThebandominancecontinuesandclearPersianinvestment;foreignmercenariesworkinginEgyptianmilitary(Greeks,Carians,Jews,Phoenicians,ShasuBedouin?);graffiti;sighapots;qanats;kegs;Persianworkmen?

PtolemaicPeriod

305–30BC

Dakhleh,Kharga

Mutel-Kharab(amongothersites),AinBirbiya,QasrZaiyan

Newarchaeologicalevidencecomingtolight

Roman 30BC– Dakhleh, Hibis,Nadura,QasrGib,Qasr SubstantialRomaninvestment;

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 7 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

RomanPeriod

30BC–395AD

Dakhleh,Kharga,Siwa,Farafara,Bahariya

Hibis,Nadura,QasrGib,QasrSumeira,elDeir,iDush/Kysis,AinManawir,Mounesis/Shamsel-Din,Ismantel-Karab/Kellis,Amheida/Trimithis,el-Muzawwaqa,DeirelHagar,Ainel-Qurayshat,AbuShuruf,Birel-Showish

SubstantialRomaninvestment;cottoncultivation;fortresses,personalnamessuggestingconnections;oliveoilproduction;wine?;cottonandothertradegoods;significantsignsofwealth

ItseemsthatthedesertandtheNileValleywerepartofanintegratedecologicalandculturalsystemthatrequiresfurtherstudyinordertounderstandtheattributesofthissystem(Usai2005,2008).SeasonalmovementsbetweentheNileValleyandtheWesternDesertintheeighthtoseventhmillenniumBPshouldnotbeexcluded.Thislifestylewascentereduponwellsandseasonallakes(playabasins)intheoases.Petroglyphsmarkmanyoftheimportantroutes,prominentoutlooks,andwaterlocationsbetweentheseoases(Krzyzaniak1990,1991,2004;Riemer2009;Winkler1938,1939).

Intheseearlyphases,wedonothaveaclearsenseofmigrationdirection,butdistinctgroupscanbeidentifiedinthematerialculture.Forexample,theSheikhMuftahpeoples,usuallyunderstoodastheindigenousDakhlans,seemtohavehadalongeroccupancyintheDakhlehOasisthanmostgroups.Thesepeoplescanbedistinguishedintheceramicsassemblagebyfineaswellascrudequartzandshalewares,mostlyconsistingoflarge,deepbowlswithoutdecoration(McDonald2001a).

WiththedawnoftheProtodynasticPeriod(NaqadaIIIA-B,c.3300–3100BC),NileValleyEgyptiansseemtohavemovedthroughtheregion.ItisalsopossiblethattherewereperiodicinvasionsbyLibyangroups,althoughthenatureoftheseinteractionsisdebated.Itisnotablethattheterm“Libyan”isacatch-alltermreferringtopeopleswestoftheNile.Ononehand,WilkinsonsuggeststhatatleastonePredynasticrulermayhavemountedaraidagainsttheTjehenu-LibyaareaintheWesternDesert(i.e.,westoftheoases)(Wilkinson2001:162).Ontheotherhand,BainesdisagreesthattherewasconflictbetweenLibyaandEgypt.Hearguesthatthe“Libya”sideoftheCitiesPaletteintheCairoMuseum(CG14238),datingtoapproximatelyNaqadaIIIB,doesnotrepresentcontrolperse.Instead,thepalettemaybeinterpretedideologically;itdepictedtheregiontothewestofEgyptasavoidthatheldnothreattothesettledpeoplesoftheNileValley.TheaimofthepalettewastocharacterizeLibyaethnographicallyinordertodemarkEgyptasseparatedfromitsneighbors(Baines2003:29–34).RegardlessofthedegreeofactualengagementbetweentheNileValleyandtheareaswestofit,itisclearthattheWesternDesertbecameanimportantelementofEgyptianself-definitionatthistime.

OldKingdom

HistoricaldocumentationofcontactbetweentheNileValleyandtheoasisregionfirstappearsduringtheOldKingdom(2575–2134BC).ThroughoutthePharaonicera,NileValleyEgyptiansrefertotheoasesasWḥ3.t,whichisassociatedwiththewordmeaning“cauldron”(Sethe1920).Aformalstudyofthechronologicaldevelopmentsofthevariouswrittenformsandetymologicalassociationswiththewordremaintobestudied.

ItisnotablethattheNileValleytextsrefertoroutesthroughtheoases,whichwereakeymeansofreachingNubia,ratherthandescribingtheoasesthemselves(Giddy1987:51–52).TheoasesprovidednaturalpointsofaccessfortradewithNubia(whenawaterroutewasnotusable)andthenomadictribesoftheWesternDesert.Oneimportantrouteisthe“Forty-DayRoad,”whichpresumablyledthroughtheKhargaOasis,southtoNubia.EgyptiansprocuredvaluedgoodsfromNubia,suchasgold,feathers,andparticularlyprizedshort-staturedWestAfricans,commonlytermedasdnbintheliterature.The“BiographyofHarkhuf”providesarichaccountofacquiringtheseprizedgoodsforpharaohs(Lichtheim1975:25–27).ThesetextssuggestthatEgyptiansviewedtheoasisregionasadistantland,whichprovidedawateringholeonthepathtoNubianexotica.

Archaeologyprovidesanotherviewoftheoases.TheThebanDesertRoadSurveyhasrecordednumerousOldKingdomcampsitesbetweentheNileandtheKhargaOasis,andparticularlywestofTundaba(Darnell2007b:35).SomeoftheOldKingdomofficialsinvolvedindeserttravelborenavaltitles(Valloggia1996),suggestingsimilarorganizationandperhapspersonnelamongexploratoryexpeditions(Darnell2007b:788).Duringthereignof

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 8 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Merenre(6thDynasty),EgyptianizedNubiansseemtohavebeenemployedfordesertexpeditions(Edel1971),foreshadowingtheexploitationofforeigngroupsfordesertpatrolsthatwefindinlaterperiods.Ithasbeensuggestedthatoasiteswereemployedfordesertexpeditionsfromthe3rdDynasty(Chevereau1987:38–39).

Archaeologicalsettlementdataenhancethisdocumentationofcampsitesconsiderably.ThevillageofBalatissituatedattheeasternedgeoftheDakhlehOasisatthejunctionoftwocaravanroutes.ThefirstofthesetworoutesistheDarbel-Tawil,whichcomesfromManfaluttothenorthofAssyutandthenconnectstoDarbel-Ghabari(Minault-Gout1985).ThesecondisaroutethatconnectsDakhlehwithKhargaandleadstotheDarbel-Arbain(thepreviouslymentioned“Forty-DayRoad”),whichtookcaravanssouthtoNubia.Desertscouts,usuallystationedonhilltops,guardedtheperipheryoftheoasis(KaperandWillems2002).Thenecessityofsuchscoutssuggestspotentialcontactswithpeoplesbeyondtheoases(seealsoKuhlmann2002;Pantalacci2013;Riemeretal.2005).

Clicktoviewlarger

Figure3 MudbrickruinsofanOldKingdomsettlementatAinAsil,dividedbythemainroad(DakhlehOasis)(AncientWorldImageBank:InstitutefortheStudyoftheAncientWorld,2006–https://www.flickr.com/photos/isawnyu/4546516398/in/set-72157623792977841,usedundertermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionlicense)

AtthejunctureofthesetworoadsrestsalargemultiphasesettlementatAinAsilandacemeteryatQilael-Dabba(Giddy1979;GiddyandGrimal1979a,b;GiddyandJeffreys1981;Minault-GoutandDeleuze1992;Valloggia1998;Valloggia1986)(Figure3).ThedatesofthesesitesrangefromtheOldKingdom(late5th/early6thDynasties)totheSecondIntermediatePeriod(ca.1650–1550BC),withalatereoccupationintheRomanPeriod.AinAsilseemstohavebeenthesiteoftheOldKingdomcapitalinDakhleh.Thesettlementwasoncesurroundedbyalargemud-brickenclosurewall,whichsubsidedtowardtheeastinantiquityandwaslaterbuiltontopof.Theinteriorofthisurbancomplexwaswellbuiltandplanned.Thefunerarychapelsofthreegovernorsoftheoasiswerelocatedatthissite.Astelawasfoundinoneofthesebuildings,whichcontainsacopyofaroyaldecreeofPepiII.Thisstelamentionsestablishinga“dwellingofvitalstrength”(Pantalacci1985).Initially,AinAsilmayhavebeenanEgyptianoutpostina“foreign”territory,butitseemsthattheoasitesandthosemanningtheoutpostintegratedovertime.

Additional,twentyormorepotentialOldKingdom“satellitesites”intheDakhlehOasisattesttotheincreasingimportanceoftheoasisfromtheOldKingdomonward(GiddyandGrimal1979b;Osingetal.1982:14;Soukiassianetal.1990).ExcavationsatMutel-KharabhaverevealedceramicsandarchitecturalfeaturesdatingtotheOldKingdom.SomeSheikhMuftahhandmadewares,takenastheworkofindigenousDakhlehinhabitants,werefoundalongsideasmallernumberofNileValleywares,includingsomeidentifiablecarinatedMeidumbowlfragments(Hope2005:50–53).TheseMeidumbowlfragmentsweremadeofNileValleymarlfabricandwerecertainlyimported.ColinA.HopesuggeststhattheseceramicsmaydatetoDynastiesIVandVandthereforetotheinitialphasesofEgyptianannexationandcolonizationofDakhleh(Hopeetal.2009;seealsoKuhlmann2002).

ThewesternportionofDakhleh,nearthevillageofel-Qasr,hasrevealedalargerclusterofOldKingdomsettlements.Noneofthesesitesisasfullyexcavated(ifatall)andpublishedasAinAsil.Preliminaryresultsfromoneofthewesternsitesshowintermixingbetweenthe“indigenous”SheikhMuftahcultureandmigrantNileValleyEgyptians(Mills1998,1999a).Thereisevidenceoftradeinlithictoolsandceramicsaswellasothersmallobjects.Theclayfromsomeoftheceramicshasbeensourcedtooasislocations,althoughtheformsandtechnologiesappeartobefirmlyNileValleyimports.ThepresenceofpotterykilnsinthisareasuggeststhemovementofNile

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 9 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

ValleyEgyptiansintotheareatoproduceceramics(Mills1999a,1999b).Asmentionedearlier,FulfordhasmadeasimilarobservationregardingceramicsproductioninRomanBritain,suggestingthatthepopulationmovementsofcraftspeoplemaybeoverlookedbecauseweofteninterpretaninfluxofregionalceramicformstobetradeitems(Fulford2010).Ifthisinfluxofcraftsmenoccurred,itwouldbeincontrasttowhatHopeandhisteamdetectedatMutel-Kharab,whereNileValleywaresweredefinitelyimported.OnlysparsearchaeologicalevidenceexistsforanOldKingdompresencewithinKharga(Wuttmanetal.2000:3;Wuttmannetal.1998:427,430).

FirstIntermediatePeriod

AfterthedeathofPepyII,Egyptwascontrolledbyrulerswithverybriefreigns.Territorialadministrationfragmentedamongtherulingelite(Garcia2013:209–211).ThenorthwasruledfromHeracleopolis,whilethesouthwasruledpredominatelyfromThebes.DuringthelateFirstIntermediatePeriod(ca.2181–2055BC),ThebesemergesasanimportantlocalefortheWesternDesert.Aconcentrationofroutes,whichThebescouldcontroldirectly,linkedthiscitytoKhargaandDakhleh(Darnell2002a).AnofficialagendatodevelopthislinkfirstoccurredintheearlyMiddleKingdom,whentheGirgaRoadappearstohavebecometheprimaryconnectionbetweenthesouthernoasesandtheNile(Darnell2007b:36;seealsopapersinFörsterandRiemer2013).Fromthisperiodonward,ThebesretainedamultifacetedroleinthefortunesoftheGreatOasis(DakhlehandKharga).

MiddleKingdom

TheThebankingNebhepetreMentuhotepII(ca.2055–2004BC)becamekingofaunifiedEgypt,inauguratingtheMiddleKingdom.EvidenceforrelationsbetweentheNileValleyandtheWesternoasesduringtheMiddleKingdom(ca.2030–1640BC)canbetracedthroughalargercorpusofwrittenmaterialthanexistsfortheOldKingdom.ThereignofMentuhotepIIwascriticalforEgypt’sbroadeningcontroloverdesertroutes;adesertpolicy,completewithabureaucraticsystem,wasestablished(Darnell2013a:791–792).AgriculturalandtradesecuritymayhavebeenthemajorreasonsbehindMentuhotep’sinvestmentintheregion,aswewillsee.

AMiddleKingdomroyalinscription(BerkeleyUniversityMuseumD136;PorterandMoss1937:117),probablyofMentuhotepII,wasfoundreusedatoneofthe18thDynastyDeirel-Ballaspalaces.ThisinscriptionsuggeststhattheoasisregionshadbeenbroughtundereffectiveEgyptiancontrol,andthattheregionwasconsideredtobe“foreign”territory(Fischer1964).LowerNubiaandanoasisareawereformallyannexedtotheThebanrealm,whichformalizedThebes’long-standingdominanceovertheoases.AdditionaltextualsourcesrefertomilitaryactivityandmanagementoftheoaseswhileindicatingthattheregionwasoutsideofEgypt“proper”(Giddy1987:56–64). CriminalslingeredinKhargaandDakhleh,asisevidentfromtextsmentioningtheneedtopoliceandsecuretheseareas(Anthes1930a:pl.7,lines4–6;Boeser1909:5andpl.10,lines7–8;Freed1996:304;Schäfer1905).Criminalsandbanditscouldhaveinterferedwiththeeasytransportationoftradegoodstoandfromtheoases.

Inadditiontocommercialinterestsintheoasistraderoute,wehavegrowingevidencethatNileValleyEgyptianswereinterestedintheeconomicvalueintrinsictotheoasesthemselves.TheoaseswereuniqueinEgyptfortheirperennialwatersupplyandboastedsomewhatdifferentagriculturalopportunitiesasaresult.ReferencestooasisproductsfirstappearduringtheMiddleKingdom.Thelimestonestelaofḥnnw(MMA,Acc.No.26.3.217)bearsanautobiographicaltextofastewardanddatestothereignofMentuhotepII(c.f.Fischer1957).Thisstelareferstotheadministrationand,particularly,theeconomicmanagementofpastoralandagriculturalproducefromtheoasisregion.Anearlyormiddle13thDynastytext,PapyrusBulaq18(CairoBulaq18,XXXIII6–7),describestheprizedwineoftheoasesinthecontextof“aspecialrecordofexpensesincurredbythecourtwhileonatripawayfromitsordinaryplaceofresidence”(Giddy1987:62–63;Scharff1922).ThelocationoftheoasesoutsidethearenaofordinaryEgyptianspaceprobablyaddedamystiquetooasiswine.

ArchaeologicalevidencesecurelydatingtotheMiddleKingdomissorelylackingintheoases,leavinguswithlittlematerialtocomparewiththevisualandtextualevidence.DakhlehseemstohavecontinuedtooverseedesertpassesinandoutoftheoasisaswellasserveasaseatofPharaonicgovernment(Baudetal.1999:1–19;Osing1986:81–82;Winkler1938:12,pl.8.1).PassagethroughBahariyaisalsoattestedduringtheMiddleKingdom(CastelandTallet2001).Supplydepots,suchasAbuZiyâreastofKhargaontheGirgaRoad(Darnell2007b:38,fig.3.4),suggestthatweoughttoexpectmoreMiddleKingdomsitestoemergeinKhargaandDakhleh,potentiallyunderneathlatersettlements.

1

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 10 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

EgyptianoutpostsalsoaffirmthatweshouldanticipatefutureevidenceofaMiddleKingdompresenceintheoases.AbuZiyârappearstohavebeenusedextensivelyinthe12thDynastyandwasabandonedbytheearly13thDynasty(Darnell2013b:256).Evenso,KhargaappearstohaveremainedsomewhatlessdevelopedthanDakhleh.AmajorofficialpresencealongtheGirgaroaddiminishesbythe13thDynasty(Darnell2013b:222).GebelGhueita,intheKhargaOasis,isoneofthefewsiteswitharchaeologicalremainssuggestingasizableMiddleKingdomsettlement(Darnell2002a:172–173).GebelGhueitaanditsassociatedburialgroundsatKomHefaw(currentlyunderstudybytheThebanDesertRoadSurvey)appeartohavedevelopedasoutpostssuchasAbuZiyârfelloutofuse.GebelGhueitaappearstohavemovedoutofThebaninfluenceearlyoninthe17thDynasty,butaThebaninfluenceresumesbytheendofthissamedynasty(Darnell2013b:244).ThesiteofTunadaba,alsoanofficialoutpost,waspositionedbetweenthewellsoftheNileValleyandthoseofnortheasternKhargaandwasinusebetweenthelate17thDynastythroughtheearlyNewKingdom(Darnell2013b:257).

Thepeopleswhomigratedtoandbetweentheoasesappeartohavebeenmulticulturalbecausetheyincludedforeignmercenaries,Egyptianofficersandofficials,andconscripts.Specialized,state-suppliedNubianpatrolmenarewellattestedwithintheThebaidandalongrouteswithintheWesternDesert(Darnell2002a;Darnell2013a:797,799–300;Scharff1922;Spalinger1986:222).Asiatics(aamu)wereacriticalcomponentofEgyptianexpeditionsintheSinai(Černýetal.1952;Černýetal.1955:19,206).Giventheirdesertexpertise,thesesameAsiaticsappeartohavebeenreassignedtovariousdesertplatoonsintheWesternDesertaswell(Darnell2007b:40;Darnell2013a:807–808).

TheSecondIntermediatePeriod

TheSecondIntermediatePeriod(ca.1650–1550BC)sawEgyptdominatedbyforeignrulersforthefirsttime.TheHyksos,whocamefromtheLevant,ruledfromtheircapitalofAvaraintheNileDelta.ControlovertheWesternDesertappearstohavefragmentedonceagain.EvenThebesdoesnotappeartohavemaintainedasignificantpresencealongdesertroutesuntilthelater17thDynasty(Darnell2002a:132,139–141),whentheywerealsoopenlycampaigningagainsttheHyksos.BahariyaalonemayhavehadaHyksospresenceduringmuchofthesecondintermediateperiod(Colin2005),whiletherestoftheoasesmayhavebeenunderThebancontrol.

NewKingdom

DuringtheNewKingdom(ca.1550–1070BC),thehighpointoftheexpansiveEgyptianEmpire,thepresenceofnon-EgyptiansinEgyptbecomesmorecomplexthaninpreviouseras(Leahy1994:232–233;Scheider1992).Large-scaletradeinconsumablegoodsandprestigeitemswithareassuchasSyria-Palestineiswidelyattested(Bader2012).EgyptianhegemonyoverNubia,supportedbythe“WesternWallofPharaoh,”astringofoutpostsandpatrolroutes,alsostrengthensatthistime(Darnell2004).EnormouscaravanseraisgrewwithintheThebaidintheNewKingdom(Darnell2002b:138–139),attestingtoamassivegrowthintrafficthroughtheregion.Thesebroadpopulationandtrademovementscreatedafar-reachingsystemofmigrationthroughoutEgypt,althoughindividuallocalareaswouldhaveexperiencedthesemovementsdifferently.

TheNewKingdombringsawealthofexternalwrittenandvisualsourcesontheoasisregionincomparisontoearlierperiods.Thismaterialfallsintofourmajorgroups:stelaefromtheearlyNewKingdom(KamosetoAmenophisI),tombscenes(withinscriptions)fromthemid-18thDynasty(HatshepsuttoAmenophisII),inscriptionsandjarstopperswithsealimpressionsdatingtothelate18thDynasty(AmenophisIIItoTutankamun),andreferencesfrompapyrifromtheRamessidePeriod(19th–21stDynasties)(Giddy1987:65).MostofthisinformationderivesfromThebesbecause,onceagain,ThebangovernorswereEgyptianofficialsappointedwithauthorityovertheoases,duringthereignofThutmosisII(1492–1479BC)andsubsequently(Kaper2008).

ThreeThebantombsfromthereignofThutmosisIII(1479–1425)havetributescenesdepictingoasisdwellersasquasi-foreignsourcesofexotica:thetombsofPuyemre,Rekmire,andIneni. Artisansassociatedtheoasisdwellerswithdistantforeigners,renderingthemprostratebeforeEgyptianstrengthwithofferingsofexoticoasisgoods(Giddy1987:76;Gosline1990:15–16).ImagesselectivelydepictoasisinhabitantsinEgyptiandressandhairtreatmentbutalsoinforeignclothing,suchasloincloths,whichmayhavebeenuniquetotheoases(Newberry1900:35).Forexample,Tomb131ofUserdepictedanoasiteinakiltmadeofanimalskin,cutawayfromthefronttorevealanextendedwhiteflapandwithalongtailhangingdownthebackleg(Giddy1980:124).Such

2

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 11 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

representationsmightsuggestthatsomeoasisdwellersretainedlocaldresspatterns,whileothersselectivelyadoptedNileValleyadornments.Alternatively,wecanunderstandtheserepresentationsascodifiedstereotypesemployedforideologicalpurposes.

NileValleyinhabitantsviewedoasitesasanovelty,asillustratedbytheimportanceofhavingoasiswomenasdancersforceremonies(Fakhry1943:483;Giddy1987:80).OasitewomencanbefounddepictedinthetombofHuyw,datingtothereignofAmunhotepIIIorIV(Fakhry1943).Theyareshownwearingcaps,necklaces,anddouble-layeredskirts.Theirchestsarebarewiththeexceptionofthetwostrapsthatcrossitandaretiedatthewaist.TheserepresentationsaresimilartothosefoundinthedepictionsofTaneferbastandBastetirdisinthetombofTjatyinBahariya(Fakhry1942:127,fig.97,130,fig.101;PorterandMoss1952:303).

Clicktoviewlarger

Figure4 TombofRekhmire(TT100),avizierunderTuthmosisIIIandAmenophisII(NewKingdom)(Hoskins,1835#14543),usedundertermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionlicense)

NileValleyEgyptianscovetedspecializedoasiscropsinadditiontothepeoplethemselves.Olives,dates,andwinewereparticularlyprized,andcultivationwasencouragedthroughimprovedirrigationtechniquessponsoredbythestate(Caminos1997:13;KaperandWendrich1998).WinewasthemostdesiredoasisproductfromatleasttheNewKingdomuntiltheRomanPeriod(Redford1977:3).DuringthereignofTuthmosisIIIanumberoftombsrepresentoasitesbearingtributeconsistingofemblematicproductsfromtheoases,withspecialemphasisgiventowine(Fakhry2003[1974]:59).Forexample,thetombofRekmire(avizierofThutmosisIII)depictsoasisinhabitantscarryingcoloredmats,foxhides,andadisproportionateamountofwine(Gosline1990;Newberry1900)(Figure4).Thesegoodsrepresentedthequintessentialproductsoftheregion,andtheprominentpositioningofwineindicatesthatitwasvaluedgreatlybytheNileValleypopulation.

NewKingdomEgyptiansalsoexhibitedagooddealofanxietytowardtheiroasiteneighborsandthegroupsbeyondtheoases.GroupssuchasthenomadicBedouinpersonifiedthefearfulforceofchaos.HaphazardattacksalongtheNileValley,particularlyintheyearsaroundcirca1100BC,suggestaprevalentconcernaboutoasispeoples.Accountsfromthelatterreignsofthe20thDynasty,preservedinthediaryentriesofthenecropolisjournalsinThebes,identifyMeshwesh,Liby,andpeopleknownasdesertdwellers(Černý1975;Haring1992).TheseaccountsindicatethattheseinvadersinterruptedbuildingactivitiesinThebantombs.Thebanworkersappeartohavebeenwarnedofthedangerofthesegroups(Haring1992:73).

Suchattacksnecessitatedthestationingoftroopsintheoases,whichsolidifiedthestateparadigminwhichtheoasisregionrepresentedabufferzonebetweenorderandchaos.BythereignofRamsesII,aseriesoffortresseswasconstructedinthenorthwesterndesertagainsttheLibyans(Habachi1980;Snape2003:98–105).Atthesametime,EgyptiansmadeuseofsomespecificLibyangroupsasdesertscoutsagainstbothLibyanandothernomadicgroups(Caminos1954:176–181).BythelateNewKingdom,thesouthernoaseshadbecomeEgyptianizedsufficientlyforEgyptianstousethemfordefensewhendangerousLibyangroupsthreatenedEgypt’sterritories(Gosline1990:11).Itisworthnotingthattheidentitiesofthenomadicgroupsarefarfromcertainforallperiods(c.f.Barnard2005,2007;Burstein2008).WelackLibyanaccountsofthesesameeventssincetheancientLibyanswerenotliterateandourknowledgeofthelanguageiswhollydependentuponclassicalandEgyptiansources.ItwasRamessidepolicytoforcesubjugatedLibyanstolearntheEgyptianlanguage(Kitchen1986:245;Kitchen1990:21),whichdemonstratestheEgyptianintentiontoobliterateadistinctLibyanidentity.

Withintheoasesthemselves,littleisknownaboutNewKingdomoccupation.Thislacunaislargelybecauseoasissiteswerecontinuouslyoccupiedandtheolderremainsarecoveredbysubsequentoccupation.Afewblocksfrom

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 12 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Kharga’sHibisTempleindicatethattherewasonceaNewKingdomtempleinthesamelocation,butnothingisknownofitsform(Cruz-Uribe1999).

TheThirdIntermediatePeriod

AtthedeathofRamessesXI(reignca.1107–1078),thethroneofEgyptpassedtoSmendes,whowasanorthernrelativeoftheHighPriestofAmun.TheThirdIntermediatePeriod(ca.1070–712BC)beganwiththeinceptionofSmendes’reign(ca.1070–1044BC).Duringthe21stDynasty(ca.1070–945BC),EgyptwasgovernedbypharaohsrulingfromTanisintheeasternDeltaandbytheHighPriestofAmunrulingfromThebes.WithintheThirdIntermediatePeriod,beginningwiththeruleofMenkheperra(ca.1045–992BC),theThebangovernmentagaintriedtoincorporatetheoasesintotheNileValley.Menkheperragavegeneralamnestyforoasisexiles(vonBeckerath1968)andconstructedfortressesattheNileValleyterminiofWesternDesertroutes(Kitchen1986:249,269–270).In945BC,theLibyansbecamerulersofEgyptfortwocenturies(22ndDynasty,ca.945–712BC),whenthethronepassedtoafamilyofLibyandescent,rulingintheEasternDelta.FurtherfragmentationandanewpoliticalcenteraroseintheeasternDeltainthe23rdDynasty(ca.818–712BC).AlthoughthedetailsoftheThirdIntermediatePeriodarenotclear,stylistic,technical,andpoliticalinnovationstookplaceduringthisperiod,particularlywithintemples(Taylor2000).

ThemostnoteworthywrittendocumentsfoundintheWesternDesertanddatingtotheThirdIntermediatePeriodderivefromDakhleh:theGreaterDakhlehStela(Gardiner1933;Ritner2009;Spiegelberg1899),theSmallerDakhlehStela(Janssen1968),andtheAmheidaStelaofTakelotIII(KaperandDemarée2005).TheGreaterDakhlehStelaprovidesalistofnamesandtitlesthatprobablyrelatetopeoplesofLibyanethnicityoraffinity(Gardiner1933:21–22,nos.1–3,17;Ritner2009:177,Ins17–18).BoththeSmallerDakhlehStelaandtheAmheidaStelaofTakelotIIIreferenceamannamedEsdhuti,achiefoftheShamintribe,whoisLibyan.TheShaminareknownonlyfromsourcesfoundinDakhleh,andEsdhutiisdepictedasahigh-statusLibyan,withasingleuprightfeatheruponhishead(KaperandDemarée2005:35).

AlthoughdocumentaryandvisualevidencemakeitcertainthattherewasactivitywithintheoasesduringtheThirdIntermediatePeriod,weareleftwithahighlyfragmentaryimageofwhatthisactivitywouldhavelookedlikearchaeologically.Forexample,thereissomeceramicanddocumentaryevidenceoftheThirdIntermediatePeriodfromMutel-Kharab(Hope2004,2005).AttemptstomakegeneralstatementsabouttheThirdIntermediatePeriodinDakhlehrelyonevidencedatingtomanyhundredsofyearsaftertheThirdIntermediatePeriod(Hubschmann2012).

LatePeriod

BetweentheNewKingdomandtheRomanPeriod,aperiodcharacterizedbyaseriesofforeignrulers,informationontheoasesisrelativelyscanty(BagnallandRathbone2004:249).

TheSaiteDynasty(664–525BC),foundedbyPsamtekI(664–610BC),endedthesporadicKushite-Assyrianpowerstruggle.Thestabilityofthisperiodwasfoundedonmercenarieswhohelpedbothtoconquerandtoconsolidatethecountry.ThesemercenariesprimarilyconsistedofGreeksandCarians,withfewernumbersofJews,Phoenicians,andpossiblyevenShasuBedouin.ThisinfluxofforeigntroopscreatedtensionswithindigenousEgyptianmilitarymen,catalyzingmutiniesbythisgroupthroughouttheSaiteperiod(Lloyd2000a:366–367).TheforeigntroopsemployedbytheSaiteshelped,however,tostrengthenforeigntraderelations,especiallywithGreekcities,foreshadowingtheimportancethatGreekcultureexperiencedundersubsequentforeignrule.

UnderthePersians(525–402;343–332BC),theWesternDesertseemstohavebecomeanimportantstrategicareasincetherearegrowingsignsofanimperialpresenceintheformoftemplesandwaterworks.ItisunclearwhythePersiansdevotedsuchtimeandenergytothisregion,althoughitwasclearlyavaluableagriculturalresourceandprestigegoods(agriculturalorother)fromtheareamayhavebeenattractive.OverthecourseofthefifthcenturyBC,activityalongtheroadsconnectingtheGreatOasistotheNileValleyincreased,asattestedbygraffitinamingDariusI(DiCerboandJasnow1996)andbythepresenceofsigha-pots(aflasktype),databletothefifthcenturyBC,whichhavebeenfoundalongthesesameroads(Darnell2000).

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 13 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Clicktoviewlarger

Figure5 “AviewoftheqanatlineatUmmel-DabadibintheKhargaOasis”(AncientWorldImageBank:InstitutefortheStudyoftheAncientWorld,https://www.flickr.com/photos/isawnyu/4566384452/,usedundertermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionlicense)

NewtechnologiesforwatermanagementthroughqanatsalsoappeartohavebeendevelopedduringthePersianPeriod(Figure5).Qanat(pluralqanatha,qanawat;Anglicizedas“qanat”)isanArabictermforanundergroundgalleryconnectingawatersourcewithacisternsomedistanceawayfromit.Thecharacteristicshaftsconnectingtheundergroundgallerywiththesurfaceallowedconstructionandmaintenancetooccurwhilealsolimitingsubstantialevaporation.Thisnewtechnology,previouslyunknowninEgypt,waslikelytobetheproductofPersianexploitationofthelandforincreasedagriculturalproduction(Newtonetal.2013).Giventheextensiveexpertiserequiredtodesignandbuild,itislikelythatthetransmissionofthistechnologyacrossthePersianempirecamebymeansofskilledhydrologicalengineers(Stiros2006).AsitisknownfromthePersepolisFortificationArchive,themovementofworkmenacrosstheempiretoaidimperialprojectswasnotuncommon(HenkelmanandStolper2009).Suchcohortsofworkmenrecalltheaforementionedtradediasporas,inwhichmembersofthisgroupbecomedifferentfromboththeareastheyworkinandtheareasfromwhichtheyoriginated.

AlthoughtheKhargaOasishassomeevidenceforpharaonicactivity,significantlymorematerialsurvivesfromtheLatePeriodonward.ThePersianswereactiveintheKhargaareawhentheycontrolledEgyptbetween525and404BCandthesitesaroundKhargaroseinimportanceatthistime(Cruz-Uribe1999).DuringthePersianoccupationofEgypt,atleastfourtempleswereconstructedintheOasis.This,alongwithanincreasednumberofstructures,atteststoagrowingpopulation.TheaforementionedqanatsareparticularlyevidentintheKhargaOasis(Bousquet1996;Chauveau2001;Schacht2003;Youssef2012),whichsuggeststhepresenceofsomepeoplesofPersianorigin.

ThetempleofAmunatHibis,locatedjustnorthofthemoderntown,Khargacity,isthebestknownofKharga’sPersiantemples.TempleconstructionbeganintheSaitePeriod,likelyduringthereignofPsametikII,withadditionsbyDariusI,Hakor,NectaneboIandII,andpossiblyPtolemyIV(Cruz-Uribe1988;Winlock1941;Davies1953;foranalternativedatinginterpretation,seeCruz-Uribe1988).ItisnotablethattheHibistemplewasdedicatedtoAmun,themaingodofThebes,andthattheThebanTriad(Amun,Mut,Khonsu)receivedspecialattention.ThistemplemayhavebeenbuilttounderscorethePersianinvestmentintheaforementionedwatertechnologiesintroducedintheregion(Boozer2000),aswellastoadvertiselinkswithThebes.

Qasrel-Ghuieta,17kmsouthofHibis,hasatemple(ancientPerwesekh)thatisapproximately19x10mwithsomeearlyportionsthatappeartodatetothe25thor26thDynasties.ItcontainsadditionalcontributionsbyDariusI,andPtolemiesIII,IV,andX.TheThebantriadisdepictedinreliefdecoration,suggestingconnectionswithbothHibisandThebes.ThistempleissurroundedbyafortressconsideredtobeofRomandate,butthisdatingconjecturehasnotbeenverified(Cruz-Uribe1999;Darnell2007a,2013a).

AynManawir,inthesouthernreachesoftheoasis,hasanagriculturalsettlementonasmallhill,whichincludesamud-bricktemplededicatedtoOsiris,aswellastwogroupsofhouses(Grimal1997:340–342;Wuttmanetal.1996:393–407).Atleasttwenty-twoqanatsfedtheagriculturalfieldsbelowthissite(Wuttman2001;Wuttmannetal.1998).Severalhundredostraka,writteninDemotic,attesttothePersianperiodoccupationofthissite.Theseostrakaalsoprovidedetailsconcerningwaterrightsandlandmanagement(Chauveau1996,2001,2005,2008),pointingtothesignificanceofagriculturalproductsforexploitation.

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 14 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

FrencharchaeologistsworkingatDushfoundatempleinthesouthernmostedgeoftheoasisdatingtothePersianperiod.Asettlementfromthatperiodhadrevealedthetemple,someimportantdocumentswritteninDemoticscript,andtracesoftheirrigationsystemdatingtoabout500BC(Bousquet1996:195–202).Statuesandgoldcoinsalsohavebeenrecoveredfromthisperiod.Thesearchaeologicalfindshavenotbeenfullypublishedyet,buttheagriculturalemphasisisclearonceagain.

Clicktoviewlarger

Figure6 DariusICartouchefromaceramicvesselfoundonthesitesurfaceinArea1,Amheida(Trimithis),DakhlehOasis(PersianPeriod)(CourtesyoftheAmheidaProject)

TheDakhlehOasisprovidesapatchy,butgrowing,corpusofdataonPersianPeriodoccupationintheWesternDesert.TheepigraphicmaterialfromAmheida’stempleinDakhlehhasprovidedanimportantcollectionofcartoucheswithLatePeriodnamesthatindicategovernmentalinvestmentintheoases.Therecoveredcartouchesarehighlyfragmentary,giventhedestroyedstateofthetemple,andinterpretationsmaychangewithtime.Atthisstage,itseemsthatminorbuildingtookplaceundertheTheban23rdDynasty(KingPedupast,ca.800BC)andtheearly26thDynasty(NekauII,610–595BCandPsametikII,595–589BC).MajorconstructionappearstohavestartedunderAmasis/AhmoseII(569–526BC)andthePersianrulerDariusI(522–486BC).WeknowthatDakhlehwasruledbyanEgyptianizedLibyantribecalledtheShamainduringtheThirdIntermediatePeriod(seeKaper2009;KaperandDavoli2006;KaperandDemarée2006).AcartoucheofDariusIstampedontoaceramicobjectwasfoundonthesitesurfaceofArea1atAmheidain2005,furtheringsuggestionsoftradeandincorporationduringthePersianPeriod(Figure6).Mutel-KharabhasrevealedsubstantialquantitiesofLatePeriodceramicsinthevicinityoftheSethTemple,whichrequirefurtherstudy(Hopeetal.2009).TheepigraphicmaterialfromAmheida,alongwithagrowingcorpusofceramics,suggeststhattheseLatePerioddynastiesincorporatedthisoasismuchmorethoroughlyintotheirregionalrulethanhasbeensuggestedpreviously.Thisincorporationmayhaveincludedagriculturalintensification,asevincedinKharga,butourcurrentevidenceisnotclearinthisrespect.

EvidencesuggeststhatPersianPeriodoasitesadheredtotraditionallocalpracticesathome,oftenrepresentingthemselvesintheirtombswearingadistinctivedressmoreinlinewithLibyantraditionsthanthoseoftheNileValley.Suchidiosyncraticoasitedresscanbefoundinthe26thDynastytombsofTa-Nefert-BastetandZed-Amun-ef-ankhinBahariyaOasis(Fakhry2003[1974]:130).

DespitesubstantialinvestmentsintheWesternDesert,thePersiansdidnotsettleinEgyptandreliedonhegemonicimperialpracticesratherthanonterritorialintegration. Thelackofsubstantialnumbersofimmigrants,combinedwithtraditionalEgyptianxenophobia,preventedintegrationbetweenthetwocultures.Indeed,localloyalties,atleastalongtheNileValley,seemtohaveheightenedduringthisperiodofforeignrule,ratherthanmixingorabating(Lloyd2000a:383).ItisentirelypossiblethatthePersianoccupationoftheoasesprovidesadifferentstory,whichonlyfutureexcavationscanreveal.

PtolemaicPeriod

3

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 15 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

AftermanyrevoltsbyEgyptiansandadiscontinuousrule,thePersianslostEgypttoAlexandertheGreatin332BC.TheeventualPtolemaicDynasty(305–30BC)ruledEgyptfornearly300yearsand,unliketheirPersianforerunners,focusedlargelyonthedevelopmentofEgypt,whereitwasbased.

Untilrecently,evidenceforPtolemaicPeriodactivitywasthoughttobelimitedincomparisontotheRomanPeriodintheWesternDesert.RecentresearchonDakhlehceramicssuggeststhatthereweresubstantialsettlementandagriculturalactivitiesinDakhlehduringthisperiod(Gill2012a,2012b).AlthoughthereareknownPtolemaicruinsfromthisperiodatAinBirbiyaandMut,wecansaylittleabouttradeandmigrationrelatingtothesesites.

Onceagain,Khargaprovidesshadowyevidence.QasrZaiyan(ancientTchonemuris),27kmsouthofHibis,appearstodatefromthePtolemaicera,althoughtheonlydatedinscriptionisRomananddatesfromthereignofAntoninusPius(140AD).Egyptianarchaeologistsworkingatthesiteclearedmuchofthetempleprecinct,exposingasubstantialgranaryandassociatedadministrativequarters(Cruz-Uribe1999).Thesefindsareunpublished,yetitispossibletohypothesizethattheneedforagranaryandadministrationintheregionsuggesttheexportofagriculturalgoods.

RomanPeriod

EgyptonceagainbecameaprovincewithinagreaterempirefollowingtheRomanconquest(30BC–395AD).RelativelyfewRomansimmigratedtoEgypt,instrikingcontrasttothemanythousandsofGreekswhosettledinEgyptunderPtolemaicrule(BagnallandFrier1994:48).ThisdistinctioninthequantityofimmigrantsispartiallyafunctionoftheRomanpolicythathinderedimmigrationtoEgyptbecausetheemperorsfearedthatsuchsettlersmightuseEgyptasabaseforpoliticalopposition(Lewis1983:16),givenEgypt’shistoryasalocalewhereRomanscouldcultivatetheirownpowerbase(i.e.,Caesar,Antony,Pompey).DespitetheselimitationsofimmigrantstoEgypt,thereappeartohavebeenpopulationshiftswithinEgyptitself,duetoRomaninvestmentandcontrolacrosstheprovincethatmayhavecreatednewopportunitiesindifferentregions.

ItislikelythattheRomansestablishedauthorityovertheoasitessoonaftertheytookcontrolofEgyptin30BC.ControloftraderoutesandresourcenetworkswasofprimaryimportancethroughouttheRomanPeriod,asisattestedthroughtheconstructionoffortsalongtheoasisroutesduringorafterthetetrarchy(293–312AD),whichmonitoredaccessthroughthecaravanroutes.Thesefortressesweremultifunctional,servingasmilitary,administrative,andevenreligiouscentersfortheoasissettlements(Boozer2013).Theroleofthearmy,ingeneral,wasmultiplexsinceitnotonlyservedasdefensebutalsocontrolledtrade,travel,andtheextractionofresources.

EvidenceofthesevariedrolescanbefoundinthefortressesintheWesternDesert,wherethemovementofpeoplewasalsoacentralconcerntotheRomanadministration(Boozer2013).Thisconcernformonitoringthesemovementsprobablyreflectsaconcernforbanditry,whichwouldhavehinderedtheeconomicinterestsoftheRomanEmpire,andforcollectingcustomsdues.Forexample,caravanscarryinggoodsfromtheoasestotheNileValleymayhaveofferedeasytargetsforbandits,particularlywhenthesecaravanswereinmoreremotepartsoftheirjourney.ThiseconomiccomponentofRomanruleconvergeduponagriculturalproduction,mineralextraction,andtradenetworking(Peacock2000:419).TheseeconomicinterestsshapedRomaninvestmentinregionsalloverEgyptand,inparticular,theWesternDesert.

ThearchaeologicalremainsdatingtotheRomanperiodsuggestagreaterpopulationdensityintheoasisregionthaneverbefore.Itisunclearwherethesemigrantscamefrom,althoughIhavesuggestedelsewherethatthemoveformanypeoplemayhavebeenforpositivereasonsratherthancoerced(Boozer2011).Indeed,theWesternDesertbecamequitewealthyduringtheRomanPeriodduetotheincreaseddemandforluxurygoodsproducedintheregion.Inadditiontoeconomicanddemographicchanges,theoasesexperiencedculturalandphysicalchangesaswell.Asaresult,theRomanPeriodbringsusawealthofarchaeologicaldataondailylife,theeconomy,religion,andotherfactors.

BytheRomanPeriod,specializedoasiscrops,suchasolives,dates,andwine(KaperandWendrich1998)wereencouragedthroughimprovedirrigationtechniques.ItisalsolikelythattheRomanswereinterestedinalum,amineralpresentintheoases(Giddy1987:5).CottonmakesanappearanceintheoasesintheRomanPeriod(ca.200AD)(Bagnall2008b;Gradeletal.2012).Thisnewcrop,whichderivedfromeitherSudanorIndia(Wild1997;Wildetal.2008),suggeststhattherewasanewconcernforproducingtypesofgoodsnotpreviouslyconsumedin

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 16 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Egypt.Theoasesweresuitableforcultivatingthissummercrop,unliketheNileValley,duetotheperennialpresenceofwater.Migrationtotheoases(mostlikelyfromSudan)mightbelinkedtothisneweconomicandagriculturalventuresinceagriculturalknow-howwouldhavestreamlinedtheintroductionofthisnewcrop.Thepotentialforslavelabor,andpossiblyevenslavetrade,shouldnotbeoverlooked.Slavelaborwasnotuncommonintheempireandwouldhaveofferedasignificanteconomicadvantageintheregion.

DocumentarysourcessuggestthatRomanwritersperceivedlocaloasispeopleasdifferentfromtherestofEgyptians.Forexample,adocumentfromAD202describesaslave“oftheOasisgenos”(Wagner1987:120),whichsuggeststhatthisgeographicdesignationwasconsideredmeaningful.Voyagersviewedtraveltoandfromtheoaseswithsignificantapprehension,sincethescorchingheatofthedeserthasalwaysbeenfearedinancientEgypt.RomanPeriodtextscontainanxiousdescriptionsofthedesertasawastelandofheat,sandstorms,andgeneraldesiccation(Wagner1987:117–118).Mixedinwiththisapprehensionofthetreacherousnatureoftheenvironmentwasafearofthepeople(Boozer2013),whichpotentiallyreflectstheperennialfearofattacksbybandits,criminals,andnomadicgroups.

UnderRomanrule,Khargaexperienceditsgreatestprosperityandtookshapewithnewfortresses(Reddé1999).ThelocationofthesefortssuggeststhatRomanadministratorswereconcernedwithinternalsecurityaswellastraderoutes.Itisuncertainiftheyrepresentaresponsetochangingcircumstancesorwerepartofanoverarchingstrategy,becausedatingremainsuncertain(Morkot1996:87).Mostofthesefortressesarenotsubstantialandwereprobablydesignedtoimpress,intimidate,andcontroltrafficratherthanprovideadefensivefunction.Furthermore,thecharacterofthefortressesthemselvessignifiesthattheywereprimarilyresidentialsincethewallswerenotnearlywideenoughtosustainanearnestattack(IkramandRossi2004;Rossi2000).

ThenorthernpartofKhargaprovidessomesignsofincreasedpopulationaswellasfortresses.ThelocationoftheHibisgarrisonhasarousedmuchconjectureamongscholars.Currently,itseemslikelythatNadura,locatedapproximately2kmsoutheastoftheHibistemple,servedasamilitaryinstallationforHibis(Bagnall2001:6–7).TwoRomanPeriodforts,atQasrGibandQasrSumeira,arealsofoundinthenorth(Hodge2007;Ikram2005).ThisconcentrationoffortresseswouldhaveprotectedandmonitoredthemovementofgoodsbetweentheoasesandtheNileValley.Notably,therecentresearchatthesiteofel-DeirhasrevealedthatcottoncultivationmakesanappearancehereduringtheRomanperiod,whichemphasizesthesignificanceofagriculturewithintheoasis(Gradeletal.2012),aswellasthesignificanceoftheoasismonitoringandprotectingthemovementoftradegoods.

Clicktoviewlarger

Figure7 “GeneralviewoftheRomanfortressatDush”(Kysis),KhargaOasis(RomanPeriod)(AncientWorldImageBank:InstitutefortheStudyoftheAncientWorld,2009–https://www.flickr.com/photos/isawnyu/4565861115/in/album-72157623964269444/,usedundertermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionlicense)

InsouthernKharga,theInstitutFrançaisd’ArchéologieOrientalehasbeenexcavatingatQasrDush(ancientKysis)from1976onward(Dunandetal.1992,2005;Harrison2007;Reddéetal.2004)(Figure7).ThetownsofKysis,AinManawir,andMounesis(Shamsel-Din)appeartohavehadpopulationsengagedintradeandcultivation,bothimportantpracticesonthetraderoutethatthefortressguardedinthisextremesouthernfringeoftheoasis(Wagner1987:182–183).

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 17 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

TheDakhlehOasiswasprofoundlyimpactedbyRomanruleasevidencedbywhatseemstobeasignificantpopulationandwealthincreaseatthistime.TheDakhlehOasisProject(DOP),directedbyAnthonyJ.Mills,involvedafullarchaeologicalsurveyoftheoasisbetween1977and1983(ChurcherandMills1995).Since1986,ColinA.HopeofMonashUniversityhasconductedexcavationsatKellis(Ismantel-Kharab),whichappearstohavebeenoccupiedduringthefirstthroughfourthcenturiesAD.ThissitehasproducedclearsignsofagriculturalintensificationaswellasconnectionstoregionsbeyondtheWesternDesert.OfparticularinterestareeconomicandliterarytextsthatplaceKelliswithinathrivingregionalagriculturaleconomyduringthefourthcenturyAD(c.f.Bagnall1997,2008a).Cottonandweavingappeartobeintegralpartsofthiseconomyaswell.

Inadditiontoagricultualindicatorsoftradegoods,Hope’sexcavationshaverevealedarchitecturalanddecorativemotifs,aswellasportableobjects,thatsuggestRomanMediterraneaninfluencesandinteraction(HopeandWhitehouse2006;Kaper2012).Inparticular,aglassgladiatorjugsuggeststhelong-distanceconnectionsandRomanactivitiesexperiencedbytheinhabitants(HopeandWhitehouse2004).Twomonumental,classicalstyletombsdatingtothethirdcenturyADwerefoundinthenorthofKellis.ThesetombsfindparallelsonlyinLibya;theyalsoresembledepictionsofbuildingsoncoinsfromNorthAfrica(firstcenturyBC)andAlexandria(secondcenturyAD),signalingpotentialconnectionstotheseregions(Hope1999).

ExcavationsatTrimithis(Amheida)since2004,ledbyRogerS.Bagnall,havecontributedvaluableinformationonRomanDakhleh.Ademolishedtemple,builtuponthesamelocationastheaforementionedLatePeriodone,experiencednewconstructionintheRomanPeriodunderTitus(AD79–81)andDomitian(81–96)(KaperandDavoli2006).Athird-centuryhouse(BoozerInpress)andadecoratedhouse(Boozer2010;Leahy1980)providenewfine-graineddataonthesocial,economic,andciviclifeofthiscity(BagnallandRuffini2004,2012).Wells,whichwereessentialformaintaininglifeaswellasagriculturalproduction,appearinasubstantialnumberoftheostrakafoundatTrimithis(BagnallandRuffini2012).

LikeKellis,theextantdomesticmaterialfromTrimithisreflectsmulticulturalaffinitiesbetweenRomanMediterranean,Egyptian,andlocaloasitetraditions(Boozer2010,2011,2012).Althoughbothawealthyhouse(B1)andamoremodesthouse(B2)displaythisintermixing,gender,age,andstatuslevelappeartohavebeencriticalfactorsinfluencinghowindividualsalignedtheirculturalaffinities.WomenandthelesswealthyindividualsofB2appeartohavetransitionedmoreslowlytoaucourantRomanMediterraneanconsumptionpracticesthanthosewhooccupiedB1,relyingupontraditionaloasitecropsforcooking.Itispossiblethattherewerecropsproducedprimarilyforthewealthyandexportation,whileothercropswereproducedforlocalconsumption.WeknowfromtheNotitiaDignitatumthattherewasafortressatTrimithis,whichappearstohavebeenlocatedatal-Qasrnearby.Thisfortress,likethoseinKharga,mayhaveservedtoprotectandmonitorthetransportofgoods.

Clicktoviewlarger

Figure8 “AdetailofthepaintinginsidethetombofPetosiris,depictingthedeceasedonafunerarybed,presidedoverbyAnubis,Isis,andNephthys”(el-Muzawaka,DakhlehOasis)(RomanPeriod)(AncientWorldImageBank:InstitutefortheStudyoftheAncientWorld,2009–https://www.flickr.com/photos/isawnyu/4545651705/in/set-72157623916994596,usedundertermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionlicense)

Thetombsofel-Muzawwaqa,whichpresumablybelongedtoTrimithis,havebeenexploredaswell(Osingetal.1982).Thesetombsconfirmthemulticulturalinfluencesthatweseeinthehouses,althoughthedecorativeemphasisswingsmoreemphaticallytowardanEgyptianratherthanaClassicalinfluence,unlikethedomesticwallpaintingsfromTrimithis(Riggs2008[2005]:161–162;Whitehouse1998)(Figure8).Thismulticulturalrangefound

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 18 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

atKellis,Trimithis,andel-MuzawwaqareflectsthechangedsocialconditionsinDakhlehaswellasthepotentiallycomplexethnicmakeupoftheinhabitants.

Deirel-Hagar,thesignaturemonumentofDakhleh,canalsobeassociatedwithTrimithisandmayhavebeenafestivaltemplethatwaspotentiallybuiltunderNero(64–67AD)anddecoratedunderVespasian(69–79AD),Titus(79–81AD),andDomitian(81–96AD).ThetemplewasdedicatedtotheThebantriadthroughSeth(Kaper1997),signalingthecontinuedsignificanceofThebanconnectionswiththeoasesduringtheRomanperiodaswellastheinvestmentinlocalcultsprovidedbyRomanemperors.

DocumentarysourcessubstantiatethesuggestionthatoasiteswerestronglyconnectedwiththeNileValleythroughtrade,familialconnections,religiousties,andpoliticalrelationships.SomeoasisfamiliesevenheldpropertyinUpperEgyptiandistricts(e.g.,P.Kell.,IG32.3n).ThegrowingcorpusofpersonalnamesknowninDakhlehaddstothisimpression.MostnamesatTrimithisderivefromNileValleycults,particularlytheThebantriad,Horus,andlocalgods,suchasTutuandShai.TherearealsoGreeknames,HebrewnamesfromtheOldTestament,afewChristiannames,andothernames(Semitic,Thracian,Iranian,unidentifiableorigins).NamesthatappeartobecommonlocallyalsooccurandusuallyhaveGreekorEgyptianorigins(Bagnall2012:42–43;BagnallandRuffini2012;Ruffiniforthcoming).

TheSiwaOasiswasfarremovedfromtherestoftheoasesintheWesternDesert.ItseemsthatSiwamayhavebeenmoreconnectedtoLibyathantoEgyptpriortothePtolemaicandRomanPeriods.TheSiwaOasisremainsamysteryintheRomanPeriod,althoughmarkedlylesssothaninearlierperiods.TombsinSiwasuggestamoderateresidentpopulationinthePtolemaicandRomanPeriods.Althoughthesetombshavebeenscavengedovertheyears,itisclearthattheyfollowmortuarypatternscommontotheNileValley(Fakhry1990:173–174),suggestingthatconnectionsdevelopedbetweenSiwaandEgyptduringtheseperiods.

Siwansettlementsites,suchasAinel-QurayshatandAbuShuruf,havebeenexplored.Ainel-Qurayshathasmanyoliveoilpressesconcentratedtogether,anadjacentresidentialzone,andatemple.OliveoilwasanimportantcommodityduringtheRomanPeriodandthecropwasintroducedacrossNorthAfrica,andparticularlyLibya,atthistime.Theintroductionofoliveoilproductionmayindicatemigrantswhoinitiatedthiscropandfamiliarizedthelocalswiththeproductionofoliveoilaswellasmanageditsexport.Thehousesaremud-brickandbuiltaroundlargecourtyards,reflectingamoreRomanizedplanthantraditionalEgyptianpractices(Kuhlmann1998),againsignalingconnectionstotheRomanMediterranean.

BahariyaOasisshowssignsofoccupationthroughoutantiquity,particularlyintheRomanPeriod(Gosline1990).Intheal-HayzareaofBahariyathereareapproximatelyelevensettlementsofuncertaindate.Thereareatleastninesettlementsinthenorthernportionofthisoasis(DospělandSuková2013:6–7).Recently,excavationhasbegunatalateRomansettlementknownasBirel-Showish(VernerandBenesovska2008:54).Oilandwinepresseshavebeenfoundelsewhereatel-Haiz(Hawass2000:148–167),againattestingtotheintroductionofcropsprizedbytheRomanEmpire.AmongthemostspectacularfindsoftheRomanPeriodaretheremainsof“goldenmummies”fromBahariya(Hawass2000).ThesemummiesderivefromanecropolisassociatedwiththeunexcavatedcapitalofBahariyaandgivesomeindicationastothewealthandimportanceofthisoasisduringtheRomanPeriod,likelyduetotheagriculturalwealthoftheregion.Indeed,irrigationseemstohavebeeninvestedinatsomestagetopromoteagriculturalintensification(DospělandSuková2013:271–285).Twofortresses,locatedatal-HayzinthesouthandQasrMuharibinthenorth,pointtowardtheneedtomonitorandprotecttradeitems.

BythefifthcenturyasignificantreductionintheoccupationofseveralmajorsitestookplaceatmajorsitessuchasDush(ancientKysis)inKharga(Wagner1986)andIsmantel-Kharab(ancientKellis)inDakhleh(MarlowandMills2001).Amheida(ancientTrimithis)inDakhleh,withitslackofclearevidenceofanyfifth-centuryactivity,likelysharedthesamedestiny.ThislocalcollapseisreminiscentofabroaderRomanimperialcollapsethatistheorized(butrightlyqueried)forthistimeperiod(Jones1964:1025–1068;Liebeschuetz2000:29–32).ItisunclearwhatfactorscatalyzedthecollapseintheWesternDesertandtowhatextentwecanconnectit(ifatall)tobroaderchangesintheRomanEmpire.Potentialexplanationsmayincludeenvironmentalchangesthatnegativelyimpactedagriculturalproduction,increasedattacksoncaravanscarryingtradegoods,orsimplyachangeintraderoutesthatnegativelyimpactedtheoases.

Conclusion

4

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 19 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

ThisoverviewofmigrationandtradeintheWesternDesertfromPharaonictoRomantimesbringsseveralpatternsofsocialimpactstolight.

First,agriculturaltradegoodsweretheprimarygoodsdesiredfromwithintheoases.Wine,oil,andcottonseemtobetheprimarycrops.Becauseagriculturalgoodsweretheprimarysourceofwealthconcentrationintheancientworld,thisconclusionisnotsurprising.Itisnotablethatsocietiesthatdevelopedlong-distancetradenetworkshadtoestablishandmaintaininformationconduitsbetweenagents(Anthony1990:902).Inparticular,thelong-termassociationbetweentheoasesandwineisnotablebecauseitlastedfromatleasttheMiddleKingdomthroughtheRomanPeriod.Thelong-termcultivation,preparation,andmarketingofthisproductcertainlycreatedenduringconnectionsbetweenpeoplesoftheWesternDesertandtheNileValley.OlivecultivationalsoappearstohaveincreasedintheWesternDesertduringtheRomanPeriod,mostnotablyinSiwa,whichmayhavebeenlinkedwithRomaninvestmentsinoliveproductioninLibya.

CottonwasaRomanPeriodintroductiontotheWesternDesert.GiventheproximityoftheoasestoSudan,itisthemostlikelyoriginforthiscrop.Inadditiontotheseedsthemselves,technicalknowledgeaboutsowing,cultivating,picking,preparing,andweavingcottonlikelyderivedfromSudanaswell.Forexample,cottonclothwasdominantatsitessuchasQasrIbrim(WildandWild2009)beforeitslowlymovedintoEgypt.Connectionsbetweenknowledgeableexperts(cultivators,weavers)intheWesternDesertandSudanseemlogical,evenifwecannotsuggestthelong-termmovementofpeoplesbetweentheseregions.

Second,qanatsaretiedtotheagriculturalintensificationfoundintheregion.Theseqanatswouldhaverequiredsubstantialtechnologicalexchangesinordertoconstructthem.Thisspecializedknow-howderivedfromtheNearEastandappearstohavebeenintroducedbythePersianswhentheydevelopedtheGreatOasis.Substantialandcomplexconstructionprojectssuchasthesenecessitatedskilledindividualstodirectandorganizetheworkforlongperiodsoftime.Onceagain,itisunclearwhothesepeoplewereandhowlongtheystayed,butconnectionswiththeNearEastwouldbelogical.

Third,long-termconnectionswithThebescanbeseeninthedocumentarysourcesaswellasthereligiouslandscapewithintheGreatOasis.Thebesgovernedthisregion,andconnectionsbetweenthoseinvolvedincivicandeconomiclifeareclear.ItwouldalsobelogicaltosuggestthatsocialconnectionsandmovementbackandforthbetweentheWesternDesertandThebeswerecommon.ItispossiblethattherewasachainmigrationbetweenThebes(anditsenvirons)andDakhlehbecausetheconnectionsbetweenthesetwoareasfigurefromapproximatelytheendoftheOldKingdomthroughtheRomanPeriod.

Fourth,somegroupsseemtoreappearovertimeintheWesternDesert.Libyans,thecatch-alltermforpeopleswestoftheNile,reappearinbothoasiteandNileValleytexts.Itremainsdifficulttomakedistinctionswithinthisundifferentiatedwestern“other”ofPharaonicEgyptianandGraeco-Romanliterature.Moreover,itseemslikelythatthisliteratureconfused“Libyans”withnomadicandseminomadicpeoplecomingfromtheoasesandsouthofEgypt.TheseenigmaticgroupsappearinwavesovertimeandwereusuallylabeledasBlemmyesor“Libyans.”Inreality,theywereprobablydifferentgroupsofpeopleswithshiftingidentitiesandcompositions(c.f.Hope2007).Equallymysteriousarethemanycriminals,taxationescapees,andbanditswhonecessitatedthepositioningofmilitaryfootholdsintheregion.PeoplesfromnorthSudanwerelessperplexingandappeartohavebeenusedasconscriptsinthemilitaryandindesertpatrols.Likewise,Asiatics,whowereemployedintheSinai,appeartohavebeensenttotheWesternDesertduetotheirfamiliaritywiththeenvironmentalconditions.

Finally,despitelong-termwavesofmigrationandtradebetweentheoasesandtheNileValley(aswellasareasfurtherafield),theoasesmaintaineddistinctiveidentities.Theinfluxofnewpeoplesandgoodsappearstohavebeenintegratedinlocallysignificantways,oftenhighlightingtheindividualpersonalitiesofeacharea.TheenduranceoftheWesternDesertasauniquelocaleinEgyptthroughouttheperiodsexaminedherecanbeseenasindicativeoftheintertwiningbetweenoldandnewtraditionsoveralongperiodoftime.

Asisevidentfromtheearliersurvey,wearesorelylackinginafine-grainedunderstandingofdiachronicdevelopmentswithintheWesternDesert.Thislackappearstobeduetothetellformationofsettlements,whichobscureearliertimeperiodsandleaveuswithRomanruinsdominatingthesitesurface.Withoutfulleraccesstopriorperiods,theoasitesthemselvesremainshroudedinanonymity.Despitethislacuna,itisclearthattheWesternDesertexperiencedmanywavesofmigrationandconnectiontolocalesinEgypt,Sudan,Libya,theMediterranean,andWesternAsiaovermanythousandsofyears.The“oasites”werenotastablepeople,but

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 20 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

ratheramosaicofthesedifferentlayersofinfluenceandconnectiontotheNileValleyaswellasfurtherafield.Despitethemutablenatureoftheoasitesthemselves,theinhabitantsofEgypt’sWesternDesertretainedspecificlocalidentitiesandpracticesthroughouttheiroccupation.Thisdistinctivequalityremainsthecasetoday,evenastheoasesexperiencewavesofmigrationonceagainfromtheNileValley.

Acknowledgements

RogerS.BagnallandGiovanniR.Ruffinireadandcommenteduponanearlydraftofthispaper.JohnC.Darnellprovidedreferencestoandoffprintsofhisrelevantpublicationsforthisarticle.Theerrorsandlacunaeremainmyown.

ReferencesAnthes,R.(1930a).“EinePolizeistreifedesMittlerenReichesindieWestlicheOase.”ZeitschriftfürÄgyptischeSpracheundAltertumskunde65:108–114.

Anthes,R.v.(1930b).“EinePolizeistreifedesMittlerReichesindieWestlicheOase.”ZeitschriftfürAegyptischeSpracheundAlterthumskunde65:108–114.

Anthony,D.(1997).“PrehistoricMigrationasSocialProcess.”InMigrationsandInvasionsinArchaeologicalExplanation,J.ChapmanandH.Hamerow,eds.:21–32.Oxford:BritishArchaeologicalReportsInt.Ser.664.

Anthony,D.W.(1990).“MigrationinArchaeology:TheBabyandtheBathwater.”AmericanAnthropologist92(4):895–914.

Bader,B.(2012).“MigrationinArchaeology:AnOverviewwithaFocusonAncientEgypt.”InMigrations:InterdisciplinaryPerspectives,M.Messer,R.Schroeder,andR.Wodak,eds.:213–226.Wien:Springer-Verlag.

Bagnall,R.S.,ed.(1997).TheKellisAgriculturalAccountBook(P.Kell.IVGr.96).Oxford:OxbowMonograph92.

Bagnall,R.S.(2001).“TheCampofHibis.”InEssaysandTextsinHonorofJ.DavidThomas,T.GagosandR.S.Bagnall,eds.:3–9.AmericanStudiesinPapyrology.Oakville,CT:AmericanSocietyofPapyrologists.

Bagnall,R.S.(2008a).“EconomyandEcologyintheKellisAgriculturalAccountBook.”InTheOasisPapers2:ProceedingsoftheSecondInternationalConferenceoftheDakhlehOasisProject,M.F.Wiseman,ed.:115–118.Oxford:Oxbow.

Bagnall,R.S.(2008b).“SB6.9025,Cotton,andtheEconomyoftheSmallOasis.”BulletinoftheAmericanSocietyofPapyrologists45:21–30.

Bagnall,R.S.(2012).“DakhlaandtheWestinLateAntiquity:FramingtheProblem.”InEntreAfriqueetÉgypte:RelationsetÉchangesEntrelesEspacesauSuddelaMéditerranéeàl’ÉpoqueRomaine,S.Guédon,ed.:39–44.Paris:EditionsAusonius.

Bagnall,R.S.,andB.W.Frier.(1994).TheDemographyofRomanEgypt.CambridgeandNewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.

Bagnall,R.S.,andD.W.Rathbone.(2004).EgyptfromAlexandertotheCopts:AnArchaeologicalandHistoricalGuide.London:TheBritishMuseumPress.

Bagnall,R.S.,andG.R.Ruffini.(2004).“CivicLifeinFourth-CenturyTrimithis:TwoOstrakafromthe2004Excavations.”ZeitschriftFurPapyrologieUndEpigraphik149:143–152.

Bagnall,R.S.,andG.R.Ruffini.(2012).OstrakafromTrimithisVolume1:Textsfromthe2004–2007Seasons.NewYork:InstitutefortheStudyoftheAncientWorldandNewYorkUniversityPress.

Baines,J.(1996).“ContextualizingEgyptianRepresentationsofSocietyandEthnicity.”InTheStudyoftheAncientNearEastinthe21stCentury,J.S.CooperandG.M.Schwartz,eds.:339–384.Eisenbrauns,IN:WinonaLake.

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 21 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Baines,J.(2003).“EarlyDefinitionsoftheEgyptianWorldandItsSurroundings.”InCulturethroughObjects:AncientNearEasternStudiesinHonourofP.R.S.Moorey,T.Potts,M.Roaf,andD.Stein,eds.:27–57.Oxford:GriffithInstitute.

Barnard,H.(2005).“Sire,iln’yapasdeBlemmyes:ARe-EvaluationofHistoricalandArchaeologicalData.”InPeopleoftheRedSea:ProceedingsoftheRedSeaProjectIIHeldintheBritishMuseum,October2004,J.C.M.Starkey,ed.:23–40.BritishArchaeologicalReports,InternationalSeries1395.Oxford:Archaeopress.

Barnard,H.(2007).“AdditionalRemarksonBlemmyes,BejaandEasternDesertWare.”ÄgyptenundLevante17:23–32.

Barnard,H.,andK.Duistermaat,eds.(2012).TheHistoryofthePeoplesoftheEasternDesert.LosAngeles:UniversityofCalifornia.

Barnard,H.,andW.Z.Wendrich.(2008).TheArchaeologyofMobility:OldWorldandNewWorldNomadism.LosAngeles:CotsenInstitute.

Baud,M.,F.Colin,andP.Tallet.(1999).“LesGouverneursdel’OasisdeDakhlaauMoyenEmpire.”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale99:1–19.

Beadnell,H.J.L.(1909).AnEgyptianOasis:AnAccountoftheOasisofKhargaintheLibyanDesert,withSpecialReferencetoitsHistory,PhysicalGeography,andWater-Supply.London:JohnMurray.

Boeser,P.A.A.(1909).BeschreibungderAegyptischenSammlungderNiderlandischenReichsmuseumderAltertümerinLeidenIIpart1,Stelen.TheHague:M.Nijhoff.

Boozer,A.L.(2000).“TheHibisTempleintheKhargehOasis:PersianImperialismandReligiousLandscapes.”MAdiss.,ColumbiaUniversity.

Boozer,A.L.(2010).“MemoryandMicrohistoryofanEmpire:DomesticContextsinRomanAmheida,Egypt.”InArchaeologyandMemory,D.Borić,ed.:138–157.Oxford:OxbowBooks.

Boozer,A.L.(2011).“ForgettingtoRememberintheDakhlehOasis,Egypt.”InCulturalMemoryandIdentityinAncientSocieties,M.Bommas,ed.:109–126.LondonandNewYork:Continuum.

Boozer,A.L.(2012).“GlobalizingMediterraneanIdentities:TheOverlappingSpheresofEgyptian,GreekandRomanWorldsatTrimithis.”JournalofMediterraneanArchaeology25(2):93–116.

Boozer,A.L.(2013).“FrontiersandBorderlandsinImperialPerspectives:ExploringRome’sEgyptianFrontier.”AmericanJournalofArchaeology117(2):275–292.

Boozer,A.L.(Forthcoming).“CulturalIdentity.HousingandBurialPractices.”InBlackwellCompaniontoGraeco-RomanandLateAntiqueEgypt,K.Vandorpe,ed.Malden:Blackwell.

Boozer,A.L.(Inpress).ALateRomano-EgyptianHouseintheDakhlaOasis:AmheidaHouseB2.NewYork:NYUPress.

Bousquet,B.(1996).Tell-DouchetSaSégion:Géographied’uneLimitedeMilieuàuneFrontièred’Empire.Cairo:Institutfrançaisd’archéologieorientale.

Briois,F.,B.Midant-Reynes,S.Marchand,Y.Tristant,M.Wuttmann,M.DeDapper,J.Lesur,andC.Newton.(2012).“Neolithicoccupationofanartesianspring:KS043intheKhargaOasis,Egypt.”JournalofFieldArchaeology37(3):178–191.

Burmeister,S.(2000).“ArchaeologyandMigration:ApproachestoanArchaeologicalProofofMigration.”CurrentAnthropology41(4):539–567.

Burstein,S.M.(2008).“Trogodytes=Blemmyes=Beja?TheMisuseofAncientEthnography.”InTheArchaeologyofMobility:OldWorldandNewWorldNomadism,H.BarnardandW.Z.Wendrich,eds.:250–263.CotsenAdvancedSeminars.LosAngeles:CotsenInstituteofArchaeologyPress.

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 22 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Caminos,R.(1954).LateEgyptianMiscellanies.London:OxfordUniversityPress.

Caminos,R.(1997).“Peasants.”InTheEgyptians,S.Donadoni,ed.:1–30.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.

Castel,G.,andP.Tallet(2001).“LesInscriptionsd’El-Harra,OasisdeBahareya.”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale101:99–136.

Caton-Thompson,G.,andE.W.Gardner.(1952).KhargaOasisinPrehistory.London:UniversityofLondon,theAthlonePress.

Černý,J.,T.E.Peet,andA.H.Gardiner.(1952,1955).TheInscriptionsofSinai,2Vols.London:EgyptExplorationSociety.

Černý,J.(1975).“Egypt:FromtheDeathofRamessesIIItotheEndoftheTwenty-firstDynasty.”InTheCambridgeAncientHistory.VolumeII,PartII:MiddleEastandtheAegean,I.E.S.Edwards,C.J.Gadd,M.G.L.Hammond,andE.Sollberger,eds.:606–657.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.

Chauveau,M.(1996).“LesArchivesd’unTempledesOasisauTempsdesPerses.”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale137:32–47.

Chauveau,M.(2001).“LesQanâtsdanslesOstracadeManâwir.”InIrrigationetDrainagedansl’Antiquité,QanâtsetCanalisationsSouterrainesenIran,enÉgypteetenGrèce,P.Briant,ed.:137–142.Paris:ThotmÉditions.

Chauveau,M.(2005).“IrrigationetExploitationdelaTerredansl’OasisdeKhargaàl’ÉpoquePerse.”LesCahiersdeRecherchesdel’InstitutdePapyrologieetd’ÉgyptologiedeLille25:157–163.

Chauveau,M.(2008).“LesArchivesDémotiquesd’ÉpoquePerse:ÀProposdesArchivesDémotiquesd’Ayn-Manawîr.”InLesArchivesdesFortificationsdePersépolisdansleMondeAcheménide,P.Briant,W.F.M.Henkelman,andM.W.Stolper,eds.:517–524.Paris:DeBoccard.

Chevereau,P-M.(1987).“ContributionàlaProsopographiedesCadresMilitairesdel’AncienEmpireetdelaPremièrePériodeIntermédiaire.”RdÉ38:13–48.

Childe,V.G.(1950).PrehistoricMigrationsinEurope.OsloandCambridge:HarvardUniversityPress.

Churcher,C.S.,andA.J.Mills.(1995).ReportsfromtheSurveyoftheDakhlehOasis:1977–1987.Oxford:Oxbow.

Cohen,R.(2008).GlobalDiasporas:AnIntroduction.London.

Colin,F.(2005).“KamoseetlesHyksosdansl’OasisdeDjesdjes.”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale105:35–47.

Cool,H.E.M.(2010).“FindingtheForeigners.”InRomanDiasporas:ArchaeologicalApproachestoMobilityandDiversityintheRomanEmpire,H.Eckardt,ed.:27–44.Portsmouth,RI:JournalofRomanArchaeology.

Cruz-Uribe,E.(1988).HibisTempleProject,Vol.1:Translations,Commentary,DiscussionsandSignList.SanAntonio,TX:VanSiclenBooks.

Cruz-Uribe,E.(1999).“KhargaOasis,LatePeriodandGraeco-RomanSites.”InEncyclopaediaoftheArchaeologyofAncientEgypt,K.A.Bard,ed.:406–408.London:Routledge.

Darnell,D.(2000).“OasisWareFlasksandKegsfromtheThebanDesert.”Cahierdelacéramiqueégyptienne6:227–233.

Darnell,J.C.(2002a).“TheNarrowDoorsoftheDesert:DiscoveriesoftheThebanDesertRoadSurvey.”InInscribedLandscapes,B.DavidandM.Wilson,eds.:104–121.Honolulu:UniversityofHawaiiPress.

Darnell,J.C.(2002b).“OpeningtheNarrowDoorsoftheDesert:DiscoveriesoftheThebanDesertRoadSurvey.”InEgyptandNubia—GIftsoftheDesert,R.Friedman,ed.:132–155.London:BritishMuseumPress.

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 23 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Darnell,J.C.(2004).“TheStelaoftheReignofTutankhamunfromtheRegionofKurkurOasis.”StudienzurAltägyptischenKultur31:73–91.

Darnell,J.C.(2007a).“TheAntiquityoftheGhueitaTemple.”GöttingerMiszellen212:29–40.

Darnell,J.C.(2007b).“TheDeserts.”InTheEgyptianWorld,T.Wilkinson,ed.:29–48.LondonandNewYork:Routledge.

Darnell,J.C.(2013a).“ABureaucraticChallenge?ArchaeologyandAdministrationinaDesertEnvironment(SecondMillenniumB.C.E.).”InAncientEgyptianAdministration,J.C.M.Garcia,ed.:785–830.Leiden,TheNetherlands:Brill.

Darnell,J.C.(2013b).“TheGirgaRoad:AbuZiyâr,Tundaba,andtheIntegrationoftheSouthernOasesintothePharaonicState.”InDesertRoadArchaeologyinAncientEgyptandBeyond,F.FörsterandH.Riemer,eds.:221–263.Köln,Germany:Heinrich-Barth-Institut.

Davies,N.d.G.(1953).TheTempleofHibisinElKhargehOasisIII:TheDecorations.NewYork:MetropolitanMuseumofArt.

Derks,T.,andN.Roymans.(2009).EthnicConstructsinAntiquity:TheRoleofPowerandTradition.Amsterdam:AmsterdamUniversityPress.

DiCerbo,C.,andR.Jasnow.(1996).“FivePersianPeriodDemoticandHieroglyphicGraffitifromtheSiteofApaTyrannosatArmant.”Enchoria23(32–38).

Dospěl,M.,andL.Suková.(2013).BahriyaOasis.RecentResearchintothePastofanEgyptianOasis.Prague:CharlesUniversity.

Douglas,M.,andB.C.Isherwood.(1996[1979]).TheWorldofGoods:TowardsanAnthropologyofConsumption.LondonandNewYork:Routledge.

Dunand,F.,J-L.Heim,N.H.Henein,H.NayelBarakat,andG.Castel.(1992).DouchI:Lanécropole.ExplorationArchéologique,Monographiedestombes1à72:StructuresSociales,Économiques,Religieusesdel’ÉgypteRomaine.Cairo:InstitutFrançaisd’ArchéologieOrientaleduCaire.

Dunand,F.,J.-L.Heim,N.Henein,andR.Lichtenberg.(2005).DouchV.LanécropoledeDouch.ExplorationArchéologiquevol.2.MonographiedesTombes73à92.Cairo:IFAO.

Eckardt,H.,ed.(2010).RomanDiasporas:ArchaeologicalApproachestoMobilityandDiversityintheRomanEmpire.Portsmouth,RI:JournalofRomanArchaeology.

Eckardt,H.,C.Chenery,S.Leach,M.Lewis,G.Mueldner,andE.Nimmo.(2010).“ALongWayfromHome:DiasporaCommunitiesinRomanBritain.”InRomanDiasporas:ArchaeologicalApproachestoMobilityandDiversityintheRomanEmpire,H.Eckardt,ed.:99–130.Portsmouth,RI:JournalofRomanArchaeology.

Edel,E.(1971).“ZweineueFelsinscrhiftenausTumâsmitnubischenLändernames.”ZeitschriftfürAegyptischeSpracheundAlterthumskunde97:57–58.

Eltis,D.,S.D.Behrendt,D.Richardson,andH.S.Klein.(1999).“TheTrans-AtlanticSlaveTrade:ADatabaseonCD-ROM.”Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.

Fakhry,A.(1942).TheEgyptianDeserts:BaḥriaOasis.VolumeI.Cairo:GovernmentPress.

Fakhry,A.(1943).“ANoteontheTombofKheruefatThebes.”AnnalesduServicedesAntiquitesdel’Egypte42:447–508.

Fakhry,A.(1990).SiwaOasis.Cairo:AmericanUniversityinCairoPress.

Fakhry,A.(2003[1974]).BaḥriyahandFarafra.CairoandNewYork:AmericanUniversityinCairoPress.

Fischer,H.G.(1957).“AGodandaGeneraloftheOasisonaStelaoftheLateMiddleKingdom.”JournalofNear

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 24 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

EasternStudies16:223–235.

Fischer,H.G.(1964).InscriptionsfromtheCoptiteNome—DynastiesVI-XI.Rome:ActaOrientalia.

Förster,S.,andH.Riemer,eds.(2013).DesertRoadArchaeologyinAncientEgyptandBeyond.Cologne,Germany:Heinrich-Barth-Institut.

Frachetti,M.D.(2011).“MigrationConceptsinCentralEurasianArchaeology.”AnnualReviewofAnthropolgy2011(40):195–212.

Freed,R.E.(1996).“StelaWorkshopsoftheEarlyDynasty12.”InStudiesinHonorofWilliamKellySimpson1,P.DerManuelian,ed.:297–336.Boston:MuseumofFineArts.

Fulford,M.G.(2010).“RomanBritain:ImmigrationandMaterialCulture.”InRomanDiasporas:ArchaeologicalApproachestoMobilityandDiversityintheRomanEmpire,H.Eckardt,ed.:67–78.Portsmouth,RI:JournalofRomanArchaeology.

Garcia,J.C.M.(2013).“BuildingthePharaonicState:Territory,Elite,andPowerinAncientEgyptduringthe3rdMillenniumBCE.”InExperiencingPower—GeneratingAuthority:CosmosandPoliticsintheIdeologyofKingshipinAncientEgyptandMesopotamia,J.A.Hill,P.H.Jones,andA.J.Morales,eds.:185–217.Philadelphia:TheUniversityofPennsylvaniaMuseumofArchaeologyandAnthropology.

Gardiner,A.H.(1933).“TheDakhlehStela.”JournalofEgyptianArchaeology19:19–30.

Giddy,L.(1979).“Balat:RapportPréliminairedesFouillesàAinAseel,1978–1979.”BIFAO79:31–39.

Giddy,L.,andN.Grimal.(1979a).“RapportPréliminairesurlaSecondeCampagnedeFoillesàBalat(OasisdeDakhla):LeSecteurNordduMastabaV.”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale79:41–49.

Giddy,L.,andD.G.Jeffreys.(1981).“Balat:RapportPréliminairedesFouillesàAinAseel,1979–1980.”BIFAO81:198–205.

Giddy,L.L.(1980).“SomeExportsfromtheOasisoftheLibyanDesertintotheNileValley—Tomb131atThebes.”MémoiresPubliésparleMembresdel’InstitutFrançaisd’ArchéologieOrientaledueCairo104:119–125.

Giddy,L.L.(1987).EgyptianOases:Baḥariya,Dakhla,Farafra,andKhargaduringPharaonicTimes.Warminster,UK:Aris&PhillipsLtd.

Giddy,L.L.,andN.Grimal.(1979b).“Balat:SondagesurleSitedeAinAseel,RapportPréliminaire.”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale79:21–30.

Gill,J.(2012a).“PtolemaicActivityinDakhlehOasis.”InThe7thInternationalConferenceoftheDakhlehOasisProject:NewDevelopmentsintheArchaeologyoftheEgyptianWesternDesertanditsOases.Leiden,TheNetherlands:LeidenUniversity.

Gill,J.(2012b).“PtolemaicPeriodPotteryfromMutal-Kharab,DakhlehOasis.”InTheOasisPapers6:ProceedingsoftheSixthInternationalConferenceoftheDakhlehOasisProject,R.S.Bagnall,P.Davoli,andC.A.Hope,eds.:231–241.Oxford:Oxbow.

Gosline,S.L.(1990).BahariyaOasisExpeditionSeasonReportfor1988:Part1,SurveyofQaratHilwah.SanAntonio,TX:VanSiclenBooks.

Gradel,C.,F.Letellier-Willemin,andG.Tallet.(2012).“‘UneLatineBienPlusDoucequeCelledesMoutons’àEl-Deir(oasisdeKharga):LeCotonauCœurdel’ÉconomieOasienneàl’ÉpoqueRomaine.”InEntreAfriqueetEgypte:RelationsetÉchangesEntrelesEspacesauSuddelaMéditerranéeàl’ÉpoqueRomaine,S.Guedon,ed.:119–141.AusoniusÉditions,ScriptaAntiqua49.Bordeaux,France:Ausonius.

Grigson,C.(2000).“BosAfricanus(Brehm)?NotesontheArchaeozoologyoftheNativeCattleofAfrica.”InTheOriginandDevelopmentofAfricanLivestock,R.M.BlenchandK.C.MacDonald,eds.:38–60.London:UniversityCollegePress.

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 25 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Grimal,N.(1997).“Travauxdel’InstitutFrançaisd’ArchéologieOrientaleen1996–1997.”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale97:313–429.

Habachi,L.(1980).“TheMilitaryPostsofRamessesIIontheCoastalRoadandtheWesternPartoftheDelta.”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale80:13–30.

Hackenbeck,S.(2008).“MigrationinArchaeology:AreWeNearlyThereYet?”ArchaeologicalReviewfromCambridge23(2):9–26.

Haring,B.J.J.(1992).“LibyansintheLateTwentiethDynasty.”InVillageVoices.ProceedingsoftheSymposium:“TextsfromDeirel-MedinaandTheirInterpretation,”Leiden,May31-June1,1991,R.DemaréeandA.Egberts,eds.:71–80.Leiden,TheNetherlands:LeidenUniversity.

Härke,H.(1998).“ArchaeologistsandMigration:AProblemofAttitude?”CurrentAnthropology39(1):19–24.

Harrison,R.(2007).“Materiality,‘Ambiguity’andtheUnfamiliarintheArchaeologyofInter-SocietalConfrontations:ACaseStudyfromNorthwestAustralia.”InEncounters,Materialities,Confrontations:ArchaeologiesofSocialSpaceandInteraction,P.CornellandF.Fahlander,eds.:42–57.Newcastle,UK:CambridgeScholars.

Hassan,F.,ed.(2002).Droughts,FoodandCulture:EcologicalChangeandFoodSecurityinAfrica’sLaterPrehistory.NewYork:KluwerAcademic/PlenumPublishers.

Hassig,R.(1985).Trade,Tribute,andTransportation:TheSixteenthCenturyPoliticalEconomyoftheValleyofMexico.Norman:UniversityofOklahomanPress.

Hawass,Z.(2000).ValleyoftheGoldenMummies.NewYork:HarryN.Abrams.

Henkelman,W.F.M.,andM.W.Stolper.(2009).“EthnicIdentityandEthnicLabellingatPersepolis:TheCaseoftheSkudrians.”InOrganisationdesPouvoirsetContactsCulturelsdanslesPaysdel’EempireAchéménide,P.BriantandM.Chauveau,eds.:271–329.Paris:DeBoccard.

Hodder,I.(1978).“SimpleCorrelationsbetweenMaterialCultureandSociety:AReview.”InTheSpatialOrganizationofCulture,I.Hodder,ed.:3–24.NewApproachesinArchaeology.London:GeraldDuckworth&CoLtd.

Hodder,I.(1982).SymbolsinAction:EthnoarchaeologicalStudiesofMaterialCulture.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.

Hodge,C.J.(2007).AMiddlingGentility:Taste,Status,andMaterialCultureattheEighteenth-CenturyWoodLot,Wanton-Lyman-HazardSite,Newport,RI.Boston:BostonUniversity.

Hope,C.A.(1999).“DakhlaOasis,Ismantel-Kharab.”InEncyclopaediaoftheArchaeologyofAncientEgypt,K.A.Bard,ed.:222–226.London:Routledge.

Hope,C.A.(2004).“TheExcavationsatIsmantel-KharabandMutel-Kharabin2004.”BulletinoftheAustralianCentreforEgyptology15:19–49.

Hope,C.A.(2007).“Egyptand‘Libya’totheEndoftheOldKingdom:AViewfromDakhlehOasis.”InTheArchaeologyandArtofAncientEgypt:EssaysinHonorofDavidB.O’Connor,Z.HawassandJ.E.Richards,eds.:349–415.SupplémentauxAnnalesduServicedesAntiquitésdel’Egypte.Cairo:ConseilSuprêmedesAntiquitésdel’Égypte.

Hope,C.A.,G.E.Bowen,J.Cox,W.Dolling,J.Milner,andA.Pettman.(2009).“Reportonthe2009SeasonofExcavationsatMutelKharab,DakhehOasis.”BulletinoftheAustralianCentreforEgyptology20:47–86.

Hope,C.A.,andH.Whitehouse.(2004).“TheGladiatorJugfromIsmantel-Kharab.”InTheOasisPaper3,ProceedingoftheThirdInternationalConferenceoftheDakhlehOasisProject,DakhlehOasisProject:Monograph14,G.E.BowenandC.Hope,eds.:291–310.Oxford:Oxbow.

Hope,C.A.,andH.Whitehouse.(2006).“APaintedResidenceatIsmantel-Kharab(Kellis).intheDakhlehOasis.”

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 26 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

JournalofRomanArchaeology19:312–328,colorplates1–10.

Hope,C.A.(2005).“Mutel-Kharab:Seth’scityinDakhlehOasis.”EgyptianArchaeology27:3–6.

Horden,P.,andN.Purcell.(2000).TheCorruptingSeaaStudyofMediterraneanHistory.OxfordandMalden,MA:Blackwell.

Hubschmann,C.(2012).“SearchingforanOasisIdentity:DakhlehOasisintheThirdIntermediatePeriod.”InKnoblauch,ChristianM.Gill,JamesC.61–70.Oxford:Archaeopress.

Ikram,S.(2005).“BriefReportoftheNorthKhargaOasisSurvey’s2005Season.”BulletinoftheAmericanResearchCenterinEgypt187:8–11.

Ikram,S.,andC.Rossi.(2004).“NorthKhargaOasisSurvey2001–2002PreliminaryReport:AinGibandQasrel-Sumayra.”MitteilungendesDeutschenArchäologischenInstitues,AbteilungKairo60:69–92,Tafel8–9.

Jamieson,R.W.(1995).“MaterialCultureandSocialDeath:African-AmericanBurialPractices.”HistoricalArchaeology29(4):39–58.

Janssen,J.J.(1968).“TheSmallerDakhlehStela.”JournalofEgyptianArchaeology54:165–172.

Jones,S.(1997).TheArchaeologyofEthnicity:ConstructingIdentitiesinthePastandPresent.London:Routledge.

Kahn,A.(1994).“‘Juthaa’inTrinidad:Food,Pollution,andHierarchyinaCaribbeanDiasporaCommunity.”AmericanEthnologist21(2):24–269.

Kaper,O.E.(1997).“TemplesandGodsinRomanDakhleh:StudiesintheIndigenousCultsofanEgyptianOasis.”PhDdiss.,RijksuniversiteitteGroningen.

Kaper,O.E.(2008).“TheLibyanPeriodinEgypt.”EgyptianArchaeology(32):38–39.

Kaper,O.E.(2009).“EpigraphicevidencefromtheDakhlehOasisintheLibyanPeriod.”InTheLibyanPeriodinEgypt,HistoricalandCulturalStudiesintothe21st—24thDynasties:ProceedingsofaConferenceatLeidenUniversity,25–27October2007,G.P.F.Broekman,R.J.Demarée,andO.E.Kaper,eds.Leiden,TheNetherlands:NetherlandsInstitutefortheNearEast.

Kaper,O.E.(2012).“TheWesternOases.”InTheOxfordHandbookofRomanEgypt,C.Riggs,ed.:717–735.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Kaper,O.E.,andP.Davoli.(2006).“ANewTempleforThothintheDakhlehOasis.”EgyptianArchaeology28:12–14.

Kaper,O.E.,andR.J.Demarée.(2005).“DonationStelaintheNameofTakelothIIIfromAmheida,DakhlehOasis.”JaarberichtvanhetVooraziatische—EgyptischGenootschapExOrienteLux39:19–37.

Kaper,O.E.,andR.J.Demarée.(2006).“ADonationStelaintheNameofTakelothIIIfromAmheida,DakhlehOasis.”JaarberichtExOrienteLux39:19–37.

Kaper,O.E.,andW.Z.Wendrich.(1998).“EastandWestinRomanEgypt:AnIntroductiontoLifeontheFringe.”InLifeontheFringe:LivingintheSouthernEgyptianDesertsduringtheRomanandEarly-ByzantinePeriods:ProceedingsofaColloquiumHeldontheOccasionofthe25thAnniversaryoftheNetherlandsInstituteforArchaeologyandArabicStudiesinCairo,9–12December1996,O.E.Kaper,ed.:1–4.Leiden,TheNetherlands:ResearchSchoolCNWS,SchoolofAsian,African,andAmerindianStudies.

Kaper,O.E.,andH.Willems.(2002).“PolicingtheDesert:OldKingdomActivityaroundtheDakhlehOasis.”InEgyptandNubia—GiftsoftheDesert,R.Friedman,ed.:79–94.London:BritishMuseumPress.

Kelly,K.G.(2004).“TheAfricanDiasporaStartsHere:HistoricalArchaeologyofCoastalWestAfrica.”InAfricanHistoricalArchaeologies,A.M.ReidandP.J.Lane,eds.:219–242.Dordrecht,TheNetherlands:Springer.

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 27 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Kitchen,K.A.(1986).TheThirdIntermediatePeriodinEgypt(1100–650BC).Warminster,UK:Aris&PhillipsLtd.

Kitchen,K.A.(1990).“TheArrivaloftheLibyansinLateNewKingdomEgypt.”InLibyaandEgyptc.1300-750BC,A.Leahy,ed.:15–27.London:UniversityofLondon;SocietyforLibyanStudies.

Krzyzaniak,L.(1990).“PetroglyphsandtheResearchontheDevelopmentoftheCulturalAttitudetowardsAnimalsintheDakhlehOasis(Egypt).”Sahara3:95–97.

Krzyzaniak,L.(1991).“DakhlehOasisProject:ResearchonthePetroglyphs1990.”PolishArchaeologyintheMediterraneanIV,Reports1992:80–82.

Krzyzaniak,L.(2004).“DakhlehOasis.ResearchonPetroglyphs.”PolishArchaeologyintheMediterraneanXV,Reports2003:181–189.

Kuhlmann,K.P.(1998).“RomanandByzantineSiwa:DevelopingaLatentPicture.”InLifeontheFringe:LivingintheSouthernEgyptianDesertsduringtheRomanandEarly-ByzantinePeriods,O.Kaper,ed.:159–180.Leiden,TheNetherlands:ResearchSchoolCNWS.

Kuhlmann,K.P.(2002).“The‘OasisBypath’ortheIssueofDesertTradeinPharaonicTimes.”InTidesoftheDesert:ContributionstotheArchaeologyandEnvironmentalHistoryofAfricainHonourofRudolphKuper,T.Lenssen-Erzetal.,eds.Africapraehistorica,14.Köln,Germany:Heinrich-Barth-Institut.

Leahy,A.(1994).“EthnicDiversityinAncientEgypt.”InCivilisationoftheAncientNearEast,Vol1,J.M.Sasson,ed.:225–234.NewYork:Scribner.

Leahy,L.M.(1980).“DakhlehOasisProject:TheRomanWall-PaintingsfromAmheida.”JournalfortheSocietyfortheStudyofEgyptianAntiquities10:331–378,platesXXI–XXXVI.

Lewis,N.(1983).LifeinEgyptunderRomanRule.Oxford:ClarendonPress.

Lichtheim,M.(1975).AncientEgyptianLiterature:Volume1,TheOldandMiddleKingdoms.LosAngeles:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.

Lilley,I.(2004).“DiasporaandIdentityinArchaeology:MovingBeyondtheBlackAtlantic.”InACompaniontoSocialArchaeology,L.M.MeskellandR.W.Preucel,eds.:287–312.Malden,MA:Blackwell.

Lloyd,A.B.(2000a).“TheLatePeriod(664–332BC).”InTheOxfordHistoryofAncientEgypt,I.Shaw,ed.:369–394.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.

Luttwak,E.N.(1976).TheGrandStrategyoftheRomanEmpirefromthefirstcenturyA.D.tothethird.Baltimore,MD:JohnsHopkinsUniversityPress.

McDonald,M.(2001a).“Themid-HoloceneSheikhMuftahCulturalUnitofDakhlehOasis,SouthCentralEgypt:APreliminaryReportonRecentFieldwork.”NyameAkuma56:4–10.

McDonald,M.(2001b).“DakhlehOasisProject.HolocenePrehistory:InterimReportonthe1984and1986seasons.”JournaloftheSocietyfortheStudyofEgyptianAntiquities15:126–135.

Meskell,L.(2004).ObjectWorldsinAncientEgypt:MaterialBiographiesPastandPresent.OxfordandNewYork:Berg.

Mills,A.J.(1998).“ANoteonaNewOldKingdomSiteintheDakhlehOasis.”TheJournaloftheSocietyfortheStudyofEgyptianAntiquities25:61–65.

Mills,A.J.(1999a).“DakhlehOasis:DynasticandRomanSites.”InTheArchaeologyofAncientEgypt:AnEncyclopedia,K.A.Bard,ed.:220–222.LondonandNewYork:Routledge.

Mills,A.J.(1999b).“PharaonicEgyptiansintheDakhlehOasis.”InReportsfromtheSurveyoftheDakhlehOasis,WesternDesertofEgypt:1977–1987,C.S.ChurcherandA.J.Mills,eds.DakhlehOasisProject:Monograph2.Oxford:OxbowMonograph99.

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 28 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Minault-Gout,A.(1985).“UneInscriptionRupestredel’OasisdeDakhlaSituéeauDébouchéduDarbel-Tawil.”InMélangesOffertsàJeanVercoutter,F.GeusandF.Thill,eds.:267–272.Paris:ÉditionsRecherchesurlesCivilisations.

Minault-Gout,A.,andP.Deleuze.(1992).BalatII.LeMastabad’Ima-Pépi.Tombeaud’unGouverneurdel’OasisàlaFindel’AncienEmpire.Cairo:Institutfrançaisd’archéologieorientaleduCaire.

Morkot,R.G.(1996).“TheDarbel-Arbain,theKhargaOasisandItsForts,andOtherDesertRoutes.”InArchaeologicalResearchinRomanEgypt:TheProceedingsoftheSeventeenthClassicalColloquiumoftheDepartmentofGreekandRomanAntiquities,BritishMuseum,Heldon1–4December,1993,D.M.Bailey,ed.:82–94.AnnArbor,MI:JournalofRomanArchaeology.

Mullins,P.R.(2011).“TheArchaeologyofConsumption.”AnnualReviewofAnthropolgy40:133–144.

Newberry,P.E.(1900).TheLifeofRekhmara,VezîrofUpperEgyptunderThotmesIIIandAmenhetepII(circaB.C.1471–1448).Westminster:A.Constable.

Newton,C.,T.Whitbread,D.Agut-Labordère,andM.Wuttman.(2013).“L’AgricultureOasienneàl’ÉpoquePersedansleSuddel’OasisdeKharga(Égypte,Ve-IVes.AEC).”Revued’Ethnoécologie4:2–18.

Orser,C.E.J.(1998).“TheArchaeologyoftheAfricanDiaspora.”AnnualReviewofAnthropology27:63–82.

Osing,J.(1986).“NotizenzudenOasenChargaundDachla.”GöttingerMiszellen92:79–85.

Osing,J.,Moursi,Mohamed,Arnold,Dorothea,Neugebauer,Otto,Parker,RichardA.,Pingree,David,Nur-el-Din,andAbdel-Halim,eds.(1982).DenkmälerderOaseDachla:AusdemNachlassvonAhmedFakhry.MainzamRhein:PhillipvonZabern.

Pantalacci,L.(1985).“UnDécretdePépiIIenFaveurdesGouverneursdel’OasisdeDakhla.”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale85:245–254.

Pantalacci,L.(2013).“BroadeningHorizons:DistantPlacesandTravelsinDakhlaandtheWesternDesertattheEndofthe3rdMillennium.”InDesertRoadArchaeologyinAncientEgyptandBeyond,F.FörsterandH.Riemer,eds.:283–296.Köln:Heinrich-Barth-Institut.

Peacock,D.P.S.(2000).“TheRomanPeriod(30BC—AD311).”InTheOxfordHistoryofAncientEgypt,I.Shaw,ed.:422–445.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Porter,A.,andR.Moss.(1937).TopographicalBibliographyofAncientEgyptianHieroglyphicTexts,ReliefsandPaintings:V.UpperEgypt.Sites.Oxford:GriffithsInstitute.

Porter,B.,andR.Moss.(1952).TopographicalBibliographyofAncientEgyptianHieroglyphicTexts,ReliefsandPaintings:VII.Nubia,theDesertsandOutsideEgypt.Oxford:GriffithsInstitute.

Pyburn,K.A.(1998).“ConsumingtheMaya.”JournalofDialecticalAnthropology23(2):111–129.

Reddé,M.(1999).“SitesMilitairesRomainsdel’OasisdeKharga.”BIFAO99:377–396.

Reddé,M.,Ballet,Pascale,Barbet,Alix,andBonnet,Charles.(2004).Kysis:Fouillesdel’IfaoàDouch,OasisdeKharga,1985–1990.Cairo:InstitutFrançaisd’ArchéologieOrientale.

Redford,D.B.(1977).“TheOasesinEgyptianHistorytoClassicalTimes:PartII.”TheSocietyfortheStudyofEgyptianAntiquities:TheNewsletter7(2):2–4.

Riemer,H.(2006).“OutofDakhla:CulturalDiversityandMobilitybetweentheEgyptianOasesandtheGreatSandSeasduringtheHoloceneHumidPhase.”InArchaeologyofEarlyNortheasternAfrica:InMemoryofLechKrzyzaniak.StudiesinAfricanArchaeology9,K.Kroeper,M.Chlodnicki,M.Kobusiewicz,andM.Poznan,eds.:493–526.Poznan:PoznanArchaeologicalMuseum.

Riemer,H.(2009).“PrehistoricRockArtResearchintheWesternDesertofEgypt.”Archaeo-Nil19:31–46.

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 29 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Riemer,H.,F.Förster,S.Hendrickx,B.Eichhorn,N.Pöllath,P.Schönfeld,andG.Wagner.(2005).“ZweipharaonischeWüstenstationensüdwestlichvonDachla.”MitteilungendesDeutschenArchäologischenInstituts,AbteilungKairo61:291–350.

Riggs,C.(2008[2005]).TheBeautifulBurialinRomanEgypt:Art,Identity,andFuneraryReligion.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.

Ritner,R.K.(2009).“LargerDakhlehStela.”InTheLibyanAnarchy.DocumentsfromEgypt’sThirdIntermediatePeriod,R.K.Ritner,ed.:173–178.Atlanta:SocietyofBiblicalLiterature.

Rossi,C.(2000).“Ummel-Dabadib,RomanSettlementintheKhargaOasis:DescriptionoftheVisibleRemainswithaNoteon‘AinAmur.”MitteilungendesDeutschenArchäologischenInstituts,AbteilungKairo56:335–352,Tafel35–39.

Rostovtzeff,M.I.(1926–1928).AHistoryoftheAncientWorld.Oxford:ClarendonPress.

Rouse,I.(1986).MigrationsinPrehistory:InferringPopulationMovementfromCulturalRemains.NewHaven,CT:YaleUniversityPress.

Ruffini,G.R.(forthcoming).“OstrakafromArea1.”InALateRomano-EgyptianHouseintheDakhlehOasis:AmheidaHouseB2,A.L.Boozer,ed.NewYork:NewYorkUniversityPress.

Schacht,I.(2003).“APreliminarySurveyoftheAncientQanatSystemoftheNorthernKhargaOasis.”MitteilungendesDeutschenArchäologischenInstitues,AbteilungKairo59:279–306.

Schäfer,H.von(1905).“EinZugnachdergroßenOaseunterSesostrisI.”ZeitschriftfürAegyptischeSpracheundAlterthumskunde57:51–68,Pl.16.

Scharff,A.(1922).“EineRechnungsbuchdesköniglichenHofesausder13Dynastie(PapyrusBoulaqNr.18).”ZeitschriftfürAegyptischeSpracheundAlterthumskunde57:51–68,Pl.16.

Scheider,T.(1992).AsiatischePersonennamenindenQuellendesNeuenReiches,vol114,OrbisBiblicusetOrientalis.Fribourg,Germany:Universitätsverlag.

Schild,R.,andF.Wendorf.(1977).ThePrehistoryoftheDakhlehOasisandAdjacentDesert.Warsaw:Zakladnarodowyimieniaossolinskichwydawnictwopolskiejakademiinauk.

Sethe,K.(1920).“DieAegyptischenbezeichnungenfürdieOasenundihreBewohner.”ZeitschriftfürAegyptischeSpracheundAlterthumskunde56:44–54.

Smith,S.T.(1995).AskutinNubia:TheEconomicsandIdeolologyofEgyptianImerpialismintheSecondMilleniumB.C.LondonandNewYork:KeganPaulInternational.

Smith,S.T.(2003).WretchedKush:EthnicIdentitiesandBoundariesinEgypt’sNubianEmpire.LondonandNewYork:Routledge.

Smith,S.T.(2007).“EthnicityandCulture.”InTheEgyptianWorld,T.Wilkinson,ed.:218–241.London:Routledge.

Snape,S.R.(2003).“TheEmergenceofLibyaontheHorizonofEgypt.”InMysteriousLands,D.O’ConnorandS.Quirke,eds.:93–106.London:UCLPress.

Soukiassian,G.,M.Wuttman,andD.Schaad.(1990).“LaVilled’Ayn-AsilàDakhla.ÉtatdesRecherches.”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale90:347–358.

Spalinger,A.(1986).“FoodsinP.Boulaq18.”StudienzurAltägyptischenKultur13(207–247).

Spiegelberg,W.(1899).“EineStelaanderOaseDachel.”Recueildestravauxrelatifsàlaphilologieetàl’archéologieégyptiennesetassyriennes21:12–21.

Stevenson,A.(2008).“EthnicityandMigration?TheCemeteryofel-Gerzeh.”InOrigins2:ProceedingsoftheSecondInternationalConferenceonPredynasticandEarlyDynasticEgypt,Toulouse,FranceSeptember2005,B.

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 30 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

Midant-Reynes,Y.Tristant,J.Rowland,andS.Hendricks,eds.:543–560.Leuven:PeetersPublishers.

Stiros,S.C.(2006).“AccurateMeasurementwithPrivateInstruments:The‘Paradox’oftheQanatDesign.”JournalofArchaeologicalScience33:1058–1064.

Taylor,J.(2000).“TheThirdIntermediatePeriod(1069–664B.C.).”InTheOxfordHistoryofAncientEgypt,I.Shaw,ed.:330–368.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.

Usai,D.(2005).“EarlyHoloceneSeasonalMovementsbetweentheDesertandtheNileValley:DetailsfromtheLithicIndustryofSomeKhartoumVariantandSomeNabta/KiseibaSites.”JournalofAfricanArchaeology3:103–115.

Usai,D.(2008).“TracingtheMovementoftheWesternDesertDwellers:Site11-I-13inWadiKaragan,SudaneseNubia,CloselyAkintoel-Ghoraborel-Nabta.”JournalofAfricanArchaeology6:219–232.

Valloggia,M.(1986).BalatI,LemastabadeMedou-nefer.Fouillesdel’Institutfrançaisd’archéologieorientaleduCaire,31.Cairo:Institutfrançaisd’archéologieorientaleduCaire.

Valloggia,M.(1996).“Notesurl’OrganisationAdministrativedel’OasisdeDakhlaàlaFindel’AncienEmpire.”Méditerranées6/7:61–72.

Valloggia,M.(1998)Lemonumentfunéraired’Ima-Pepy/Ima-Meryrê.BalatIV.Fouillesdel’Institutfrançaisd’archéologieorientale38.Cairo:Institutfrançaisd’archéologieorientale.

vanDommelen,P.(2012).“ColonialismandMigrationintheAncientMediterranean.”AnnualReviewofAnthropology41:393–409.

vanDommelen,P.ed.(2014).MobilityandMigration.WorldArchaeology46.4.

vanDommelen,P.,andA.B.Knapp,eds.(2010).MaterialConnectionsintheAncientMediterranean:Mobility,MaterialityandIdentity.NewYork:Routledge.

Verner,M.,andH.Benesovska.(2008).UnearthingAncientEgypt:FiftyYearsoftheCzechArchaeologicalExplorationinEgypt.Prague:CharlesUniversity.

vonBeckerath,J.(1968).“DieStelederVerbanntenimMuseumdesLouvre.”RevueD’Egyptologie20:7–36.

Wagner,G.(1987).LesOasisd’Égypteàl’époquegrecque,romaineetbyzantined´aprèslesdocumentsgrecs.Cairo:InstitutFrançaisd’ArchéologieOrientaleduCaire.

Wendorf,F.,andR.Schild.(1980).PrehistoryoftheEasternSahara.NewYork:AcademicPress.

Wendorf,F.,andR.Schild.(2001).HoloceneSettlementoftheEgyptianSahara1,TheArchaeologyofNabtaPlaya.NewYork:KluwerAcademic.

Whitehouse,H.(1998).“RomaninLife,EgyptianinDeath:ThePaintedTombofPetosirisintheDakhlehOasis.”InLifeontheFringe:LivingintheSouthernEgyptianDesertsduringtheRomanandEarly-ByzantinePeriods:ProceedingsofaColloquiumHeldontheOccasionofthe25thAnniversaryoftheNetherlandsInstituteforArchaeologyandArabicStudiesinCairo,9–12December1996,O.E.Kaper,ed.:253–270.ContributionsbytheNederlands-VlaamsInstituutinCairo.Leiden,TheNetherlands:ResearchSchoolCNWS,SchoolofAsian,AfricanandAmerindianStudies.

Wild,J.P.(1997).“CottoninRomanEgypt:SomeProblemsofOrigin.”Al-RafidanXVIII(Specialvolume:FestschriftforProfessorHideoFujii,KokushikanUniversity):287–298.

Wild,J.P.,andF.C.Wild.(2009).“Cotton:TheNewWool,QasrIbrimStudySeason2008.”ArchaeologicalTextilesNewsletter46:3–6.

Wild,J.P.,F.C.Wild,andA.J.Clapham.(2008).“RomanCottonRevisited.”InPurpureaeVestesII,Vestidos,TextilesyTintes:Estudiossoberlaproducciondebienesdeconsumoenlaantiguidad,C.AlfaroandL.Karali,

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 31 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015

eds.:143–147.Valencia:UniversitatdeValència.

Wilkie,L.A.(2004).“ConsideringtheFutureofAfricanAmericanArchaeology.”HistoricalArchaeology38(1):109–123.

Wilkinson,T.A.H.(2001).EarlyDynasticEgypt.London:Routledge.

Winkler,H.A.(1938).Rock-DrawingsofSouthernUpperEgyptI:SirRobertMondDesertExpedition.Season1936–1937PreliminaryReport.2.London:EgyptExplorationSociety.

Winkler,H.A.(1939).RockDrawingsofSouthernUpperEgyptII(IncludingUwenat):SirRobertMondDesertExpedition.Season1937–1938PreliminaryReport.London:EgyptExplorationSociety.

Winlock,H.E.(1941).TheTempleofHibisinElKhargehOasis.III.NewYork:MetropolitanMuseumofArt.

Wiseman,M.F.(1999).“KhargaOasis,PrehistoricSites.”InTheEncyclopediaoftheArchaeologyofAncientEgypt,K.A.Bard,ed.:408–411.London:Routledge.

Wuttman,M.(2001).“LesQanatsde‘Aynmanāwīr.”InIrrigationetDrainagedansl’Antiquité.QanâtsetCanalisationsSouterrainesenIran,enÉgypteetenGrèce,P.Briant,ed.:109–136.Paris:ThotmÉditions(“Persika2”).

Wuttman,M.,B.Bousquet,M.Chauveau,P.Dils,S.Marchand,A.Schweitzer,andL.Volay.(1996).“PremierRapportPréliminairedesTravauxsurleSitede‘Ayn-Manâwîr(OasisdeKharga).”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale96:385–451.

Wuttman,M.,T.Gonon,andC.Thiers.(2000).“TheQanatsof‘AynManâwîr(KhargaOasis,Egypt).”JournalofAchaemenidStudiesandResearches1(1).

Wuttmann,M.,Barakat,H.N.,Bousquet,B.,Chauveau,M.,Gonon,T.,Marchand,S.,Robin,M.,andSchweitzer,A.(1998).“‘AynManawir(oasisdeKharga).Deuxièmerapportpréliminaire.”Bulletindel’InstitutFrancaisd’ArcheologieOrientale98:367–462.

Youssef,S.(2012).“QanatsintheDakhlehOasis.”Paperpresentedatthe7thInternationalConferenceoftheDakhlehOasisProject:NewDevelopmentsintheArchaeologyoftheEgyptianWesternDesertanditsOases,20–24June2012,LeidenUniversity,Netherlands.

Notes:

( )SeethestelaofDd-jkw(Berlin1999),whichmayderivefromAbydos(Schäfer1905);thestelaofK3y(Berlin2820),whichmayderivefromQamula(Anthes1930b);thestelaofS3-Hthr(B.M.569D12),whichmayderivefromAbydos(Fischer1957:228–229);andthestelaof‘Inw(UniversityofPennsylvaniaMuseumno.54-33-1),whichmayderivefromAbydos(ibid.:223–224).Althoughtheprovenanceofthesestelaeisquestionable,thefocusuponAbydosissignificant.

( )AdditionalThebanprivatetombsoftheNewKingdomincludeSenemirh,Intef,Menkheperreseneb,andUsir(Giddy:1980,Giddy1987:70).

( )Onhegemonicandterritorialempires,seeLuttwak1976,Hassig1985:101.

( )Egyptianhousestypicallyhadacourtyardofftoonesideorbehindhouses.

AnnaLucilleBoozerAssistantProfessorofHistoryHistoryDepartmentBaruchCollegeCityUniversityofNewYork

1

2

3

4

The Social Impact of Trade and Migration

Page 32 of 32

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 22 December 2015