Upload
independent
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The role of the glycan moiety on the structure–function relationships
of PD-L1, type 1 ribosome-inactivating protein from P. dioica leaves
Valeria Severino,a Angela Chambery,*a Antimo Di Maro,a Daniela Marasco,b
Alessia Ruggiero,cRita Berisio,
cFrancesco Giansanti,
dRodolfo Ippoliti
dand
Augusto Parentea
Received 24th September 2009, Accepted 9th December 2009
First published as an Advance Article on the web 21st January 2010
DOI: 10.1039/b919801f
N-glycosylation is one of the major naturally occurring covalent co-translational modifications of
proteins in plants, being involved in proteins structure, folding, stability and biological activity. In
the present work the influence of carbohydrate moieties on the structure–function relationships of
type 1 ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) was investigated. To this aim, PD-Ls, RIPs isolated
from Phytolacca dioica L. leaves, differing for their glycosylation degree, were used as an
experimental system. In particular, comparative structural and biological analyses were performed
using native and unglycosylated recombinant PD-L1, the most glycosylated P. dioica RIP
isoform. The glycans influence on protein synthesis inhibition and adenine polynucleotide
glycosidase activity was investigated. The interaction with adenine, the product of the
de-adenylation reaction, was also investigated for native and recombinant PD-L1 by fluorescence
spectroscopy. Furthermore, the crystal structure of PD-L1 in complex with adenine was
determined. Our data confirm that the absence of glycan moieties did not affect the biological
activity in terms of protein synthesis inhibition. However, the removal of carbohydrate chains
significantly increased the deadenylation capability, likely as a consequence of the increased
accessibility of substrates to the active site pocket. Furthermore, preliminary data on cellular
uptake showed that all PD-L isoforms were internalized and, for the first time, that the vesicular
distribution within cells could be influenced by the protein glycosylation degree.
Introduction
Ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) are N-b-glycosidaseswhich remove a specific adenine residue in the major rRNA of
prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosomes (A4324 in rat liver 28S
rRNA).1–4 RIPs are divided into type 1, single-chain proteins
with molecular mass around 30 kDa and basic pI, and type 2,
two chain proteins with Mr around 60 kDa and pI between 4.5
and 8.0, in which an enzymatically active A chain is linked to a
B chain with lectin properties. A type 3 has been proposed,
including some peculiar RIPs,5–7 synthesized as inactive
precursors (pro-RIPs), and then enzymatically activated by
proteolytic cleavages. RIPs act as adenine polynucleotide
glycosylases (APG),8 being also active on substrates other
than rRNA, such as viral RNA, poly(A), and DNA.9 The
lectinic B chain of type 2 RIPs preferentially binds to receptors
on the cell surface carrying a terminal galactose at their
carbohydrate moiety, allowing the internalization of the
enzymatic A chain into cells. Type 1 RIPs, being devoid of
the B chain, cannot bind to cells and consequently their cell
toxicity is much lower than that of type 2 RIPs. The wide
spectrum of biological activities, beyond the main rRNA
N-b-glycosidase action, increased the interest on the physiological
role of RIPs in planta and on their potential biotechnological
applications, mainly focused on their use as immunotoxins
against tumors. RIPs have also applications in agriculture as
antiviral and antifungal agents against plants pathogens.
Several type 1 and type 2 RIPs are glycoproteins. Although
both RIP structure and rRNA N-b-glycosidase activity have
been studied in great detail, few studies have been focused on
the potential influence of the glycan moiety on the structure of
type 1 RIPs and in turn on their biological activities.
Phytolacca dioica L. contains several RIP isoforms which
constitute an excellent experimental system for such studies.
Indeed, their characterization revealed that fully expanded
leaves of adult plants express four isoforms, named PD-L1/
PD-L2 and PD-L3/PD-L4.10,11 The interest in these RIPs
stems from the fact that PD-L1 and PD-L2 have the same
primary structure, but are differently glycosylated. In particular,
PD-L1 presents three N-glycosylation sites (Asn10, Asn43 and
Asn255), occupied by a paucimannosidic-type N-glycan
[(Man)3 (GlcNAc)2 (Fuc)1 (Xyl)1], while PD-L2 lacks the
glycan chain on Asn255. Similarly, PD-L3 and PD-L4 have
the same primary structure (with 81.6% primary structure
identity with PD-L1/PD-L2). PD-L3 has the glycan moiety
aDipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Seconda Universita di Napoli,Via Vivaldi 43, I-81100 Caserta, Italy.E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: +39 0823 274571
bDipartimento delle Scienze Biologiche, Sez. Biostrutture, Universitadegli Studi di Napoli ‘‘Federico II’’, Via Mezzocannone 16,I-80134 Napoli, Italy
c Istituto di Biostrutture e Bioimmagini, CNR, via Mezzocannone 16,I-80134, Napoli, Italy
dDipartimento di Biologia di Base ed Applicata, Universita degli Studidi L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, I-67010 Coppito, Italy
570 | Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 570–579 This journal is �c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
PAPER www.rsc.org/molecularbiosystems | Molecular BioSystems
Dow
nloa
ded
on 1
5 Se
ptem
ber
2010
Publ
ishe
d on
21
Janu
ary
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9198
01F
View Online
only on Ans10, while PD-L4 is not glycosylated.11 Although
some care must be taken in interpreting the results of the
modeling approach, molecular simulations of glycan chains of
PD-L1, PD-L2 and PD-L3 have been reported by Di Maro
et al., 2009.11 In this work, the spatial position of the
paucidomannosidic glycan moieties, including their mobility
and H-bonds interaction network with the protein chain, were
obtained. The standard plant paucimannosidic-type N-glycan
structure was also found in PD-S2, type 1 RIP isolated from
P. dioica seeds.12
Even not considering the implications on the enzymatic
N-b-glycosidase activity and/or the resulting protein synthesis
inhibition, it could not be excluded that the glycan moiety of
type 1 RIPs could be responsible of different internalization
mechanisms and routing into animal cells.
In the present work the potential influence of the glycan
moiety on RIP structure and biological activities was
investigated. To this aim, the PD-L1/2 gene was cloned and
expressed in the E. coli heterologous system to obtain the
unglycosylated recombinant protein. Comparative structural
and functional analyses were performed to study the implications
of the lack of PD-L1/2 carbohydrate chains. In addition, a
preliminary study reporting evidences of RIP differential
cellular uptake is also reported.
Experimental
Materials
Restriction endonucleases and T4 DNA ligase were purchased
from Boehinger Mannheim GmbH (Mannheim, Germany).
The kit for plasmid purification was from Promega (Milan,
Italy). Expression vector pET22b(+) and E. coli strain
BL21(DE3) were from AMS Biotechnology (Lugano,
Switzerland). DNA manipulation, transformation and plasmid
purification were performed according to previously published
methods.13 Native PD-L1, PD-L2 and PD-L4 were purified
from P. dioica leaves as described.10
Synthesis and cloning of PD-L1 synthetic gene
PD-L1/2 amino acid sequence was used for the backtranslation
to the DNA sequence by using the GeneOptimizer software
(GENEART GmbH, Germany). The codon usage was
adapted to the codon bias of Escherichia coli genes to allow
high and stable expression rates. In addition, regions of very
high (480%) or very low (o30%) GC content were avoided
where possible. The PD-L1 optimized synthetic gene was
produced by GENEART GmbH Company (Regensburg,
Germany). A NdeI restriction site was added at the 50 end of
the coding sequence. A stop codon, followed by a EcoRI
restriction site was introduced at the 30 end. The synthetic
gene was assembled from synthetic oligonucleotides using a
PCR-based strategy. The 810 bp long PD-L1/2 synthetic gene
was first cloned into pGA4 (ampR) vector using KpnI and
SacI restriction sites (Stratagene, CA, USA). All constructs
were verified by sequencing, showing 100% sequence
congruence to the designed gene. For heterologous expression,
the PD-L1/2 coding sequence was subcloned into pET22b
(ampR) using NdeI and EcoRI restriction sites and trans-
formed into E. coli BL21(DE3) strain by electroporation.
Expression, folding, and purification of recombinant PD-L1
Expression, folding, and purification of recombinant PD-L1/2,
hereafter named rPD-L1, were mainly performed according to
previously reported protocols.13 The induction of the expression
of rPD-L1 was carried out on with 0,4 mM IPTG at 37 1C for
16 h in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth. Considering the glycosylation
of native PD-L1 (nPD-L1), it was necessary to introduce some
modifications into the rPD-L1 refolding strategy. In particular,
a higher ratio (1 : 10) of the redox-pair oxidized : reduced
glutathione, a higher ionic strength and the addition of
0.4 M sucrose were used in the refolding buffer (10 mM
NaP/0.5 M L-Arg/0.6 mM GSSG/6 mM GSH/0.4 M
sucrose/0.2 M NaCl/10 mM KCl/2 mM CaCl2/2 mM MgCl2,
pH 8.4). The refolded PD-L1 was concentrated by ultra-
filtration, dialyzed against 5 mM Na phosphate buffer (NaP)
pH 7.2 at 4 1C and purified by FPLC, using a cation exchange
chromatography on a Source 15S column.13 The column
was equilibrated in and washed with 5 mM NaP, pH 7.2 at
1 mL min�1. Protein elution was achieved by increasing the
NaCl concentration from 0 to 0.3 M in the same buffer. Each
step of the expression and purification procedure was
monitored by 12% SDS-PAGE. The eluted protein peaks
were collected, dialyzed, and kept frozen until use.
N-terminal amino acid sequencing
rPD-L1, separated by SDS-PAGE, was transferred onto a
PVDF membrane (Applied Biosystems) and directly subjected
to Edman degradation on a Procise Model 491 sequencer
(Applied Biosystems) for N-terminal sequencing.13
Mass spectrometry analysis
The relative molecular mass (Mr) of rPD-L1 was determined
using a Q-TOF Micro mass spectrometer (Waters, Manchester,
UK) as previously reported.12 The capillary source voltage
and the cone voltage were set at 3000 V and 35 V, respectively.
The source temperature was kept at 80 1C and nitrogen was
used as a drying gas (flow rate 50 L h�1). RP-HPLC purified
protein at a concentration of about 1 pmol mL�1 was infusedinto the system at a flow rate of 5 mL min�1. The acquisition
and deconvolution of data were performed by Mass Lynx
software (Waters, Manchester, UK).
Circular dichroism spectroscopy and thermal denaturation
analysis
CD spectra were recorded on a Jasco J-810 spectropolarimeter
(JASCO Corp, Milan, Italy) in the far UV region from 190 to
260 nm. Each spectrum was obtained averaging three scans,
subtracting contributions from corresponding blanks and
converting the signal to mean residue ellipticity in units of
deg cm2 dmol�1 res�1.
Measures were performed with a protein concentration of
0.8 mM in 20 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.0, using a 0.1 cm
path-length quartz cuvette. Data were collected at 0.2 nm
resolution, 20 nm min�1 scan speed, 1.0 nm bandwidth and 4s
response. Thermal denaturation profiles were obtained by
This journal is �c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 570–579 | 571
Dow
nloa
ded
on 1
5 Se
ptem
ber
2010
Publ
ishe
d on
21
Janu
ary
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9198
01F
View Online
measuring the temperature dependence of the ellipticity at
222 nm in the 40–90 1C range with a resolution of 0.5 1C and
1.0 nm bandwidth. The heating rate was 1 1C min�1 and the
response at 16 s with a Peltier temperature controller.
Fluorescence analysis
Fluorescence spectroscopy investigations were carried out at
room temperature using a Varian Cary Eclipse spectro-
fluorimeter, with excitation at 280 nm and emission at 300 nm
using 5 nm slits. Spectra were recorded in the 300–400 nm
wavelength range. Adenine titration with nPD-L1, rPD-L1
and PD-L4 was performed using protein concentrations of 3,
4.5 and 3 mM, respectively in 20 mM phosphate buffer at
pH 7.0. Adenine equivalents ranged from 0 to 50.
Biological assays
Protein synthesis inhibition was determined with a rabbit
reticulocyte lysate as previously described.14 Adenine poly-
nucleotide glycosidase activity was assayed on herring sperm
DNA (hsDNA) and poly(A) substrates as described
elsewhere.9,13 Briefly, 100 pmol of rPD-L1, native PD-L1 or
PD-L2 were incubated with 100 mg of substrates at 37 1C for
1 h in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 4.0, containing 100 mM
KCl in a final volume of 300 mL. Reactions were always run in
duplicate and results expressed as the mean of three different
experiments. After incubation, the reaction was stopped by
cooling samples in ice. Polynucleotides were removed by
ethanol/sodium acetate precipitation. Adenine release was
measured spectrophotometrically at 260 nm.
Crystallization, data processing and structure refinement
Best crystals of PD-L1 were obtained using the macro-seeding
technique as described.15 Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction
experiments were obtained after the transfer of needles to a
pre-equilibrated solution containing 10 mg mL�1 PD-L1,
0.16 M sodium acetate trihydrate, 0.1 M sodium cacodylate
trihydrate (pH 6.5), 24% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 8000,
3 mM adenine.
Diffraction data (1.65 A) were collected at the BW7A
beamline, DESY, Hamburg. Crystals were flash-cooled after
the addition of increasing concentrations, ranging from 4 to
14% (v/v) of ethylene glycol to the crystallisation buffer. Data
processing and scaling was performed using the HKL2000
package.16
Crystallographic refinement was carried out starting from
the structure of nPD-L1 (PDB code 3H5K) against 95% of the
measured data, in the range 15–1.65 A resolution, using the
ccp4i program suite.17 The remaining 5% of the observed
data, which was randomly selected, was used in Rfree
calculations to monitor the progress of refinement. Non
crystallographic restraints were applied in REFMAC with
medium restraints for main-chain atoms and loose restraints
for side-chain atoms. Water molecules were incorporated into
the structure in several rounds of successive refinement, using
ARP/wARP followed by REFMAC runs.18,19 The final
protein model included 522 residues, and presented R and
Rfree values of 19.6 and 25.1%, respectively. The pertinent
refinement details along with the necessary statistics for the
final protein model are given in Table 1. Atomic coordinates
have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with
PDB-ID 3LE7.
PD-Ls and rPD-L1 labelling and cell internalization by
fluorescence analysis
Native PD-Ls and rPD-L1 were labelled using Texas-red
fluorescent dye by incubation with 5 fold excess dye in
20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 for 1 h at room temperature.
The reaction was stopped by desalting the mixture on a
Sephadex G25 column equilibrated in the same buffer.
Labelled proteins were analysed by SDS-PAGE.
For cell internalization experiments the NIH3T3 mouse
embryonic fibroblasts (ATCC, LGC Promochem, Middlesex,
UK) were cultured in DMEM containing 10% foetal calf
serum. For microscopy experiments, cells (2 � 105 mL) were
grown on glass coverslips for two days before use. PD-Ls and
rPD-L1 were incubated on the coverslips with fluorescent
proteins (2 mM final concentration). After 24, 48 and 72 h,
the coverslips were washed with PBS and fixed with 4%
p-formaldehyde in the same buffer for 20 min at 4 1C.
Coverslips were mounted onto microscope slides and sealed
with nail polish, for observation on a Zeiss Axiophot
fluorescence microscope. Monochrome images have been
taken for each sample using the filter sets for texas red and
DAPI fluorescence. All experiments were carried out in triplicates.
Results
Synthesis and expression of PD-L1 synthetic gene
The PD-L1/2 amino acid sequence was used for the back-
translation to the DNA sequence, in turn utilized for the
assembling of a synthetic gene using a PCR-based strategy.
The 810 bp PD-L1/2 synthetic gene was cloned into pET22b
and transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) strain for hetero-
logous expression. The SDS-PAGE analysis of lysates from
induced and non-induced cells showed that a protein with a
molecular mass of about 29 kDa, the expected molecular size
for recombinant PD-L1/2 (hereafter named rPD-L1), was
present only in the induced cells (data not shown). The
expression of the rPD-L1 was found to be mostly in the
inclusion bodies with an average yield of about 0.02 mg of
protein per mL of bacterial culture. Its identity was confirmed
by direct Edman degradation of the first 11 N-terminal
residues, including the initial methionine at the N-terminal
(NH2-MINTITYDAGN-COOH).
Folding and purification of recombinant PD-L1
Despite the high percentage of sequence identity (81.6%), a
first attempt to use a folding strategy already reported for the
renaturation of PD-L412 revealed to be unsuccessful for
rPD-L1 folding (data not shown). Protein aggregates were
present at the end of the folding procedure. We first hypothesized
that this failure could be due to the presence of the glycan
chains on native PD-L1 and decided to modify the rPD-L1
folding strategy, increasing both redox-pair GSH/GSSH ratio,
and salt concentration. In particular, the addition of sucrose
to the folding buffer was determinant to achieve rPD-L1
572 | Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 570–579 This journal is �c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Dow
nloa
ded
on 1
5 Se
ptem
ber
2010
Publ
ishe
d on
21
Janu
ary
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9198
01F
View Online
renaturation as revealed by structural and biological assays
(see later). The refolded protein was concentrated by ultra-
filtration and purified by cation exchange chromatography on
a Source 15S column (Fig. 1A). Peak 3, the major component,
was found to be homogeneous by SDS-PAGE. Minor peaks
(peaks 1 and 2), whose amount was found to be variable among
folding experiments, contained refolding intermediates, as
confirmed bymass spectrometry analysis (see later) and according
to a previously reported study on the folding of PD-L4.13
Mass spectrometry analysis
ESI/Q-TOF MS analysis of peaks 1 and 2 revealed the
presence of heterogeneous protein species whose molecular
masses corresponded to that of rPD-L1 with an extra methionine
and one or more glutathione moieties (data not shown). Thus,
these forms were not further analysed. The accurate relative
molecular mass (Mr) of peak 3 (29349, 32 � 0, 24) was found
to be in good agreement with the theoretical Mr of PD-L1
(29349.28, D=0.04 Da), calculated on the basis of its amino
acid sequence, including the extra methionine, and considering
the two disulfide bridges present in native PD-L1.11 The
ESI-MS spectra, deconvoluted using maximum entropy
algorithm,20 is reported in Fig. 1B. Minor MS peak, corres-
ponding to the [M + H3PO4]+ adduct (+98 amu) was also
detected.
Circular dichroism
A comparative study of the secondary structures of nPD-L1
and rPD-L1 was performed by circular dichroism (CD)
analysis. The CD spectra of both proteins exhibited, at 20 1C,
minima at 222 and 208 nm and a positive maximum at 190 nm,
typical of a-helices (insets of Fig. 2, plain line). This indicated,
as expected, that the two proteins adopted the same secondary
structure. To investigate the potential influence of the carbo-
hydrate moiety on protein stability, thermal denaturation
curves of rPD-L1 and nPD-L1 were performed. We observed
that unfolding of rPD-L1 was fully cooperative (Fig. 2A),
whereas cooperativity of unfolding was not observed for
nPD-L1 (Fig. 2B). The thermal denaturation of nPD-L1
displays a smaller variation of the CD signal at 222 nm,
compared to rPD-L1. This indicates that nPD-L1 is composed
of two unfolding units which display different thermal
stabilities and demonstrates that the major part of nPD-L1
is resistant to thermal unfolding. Consistently, measures of
CD spectra at 90 1C showed that both rPD-L1 and nPD-L1
retained residual secondary structure upon thermal denaturation
(insets of Fig. 2, dotted lines). Both spectra recorded at 90 1C
for nPD-L1 and for rPD-L1 exhibited a clear minimum at
214 nm (insets of Fig. 2, dotted lines), which is indicative of a
residual b-sheet structure. Furthermore, a deeper minimum at
214 nm, indicative of a larger amount of residual b-sheet, wasobserved for nPD-L1. This result well agrees with previous
studies showing that glycosylation often has a stabilising effect
on protein structures.21
Biological and enzymatic activity assays
Both recombinant and native (as positive control) PD-L1 were
assayed for their biological activities by measuring their
abilities to inhibit protein synthesis in a rabbit reticulocyte
cell-free system as described in the Method section. The ability
of rPD-L1 and nPD-L1 to inhibit protein synthesis was
comparable, as the IC50 values were 8.9 pM and 8.5 pM,
respectively.
Furthermore, the adenine polynucleotide glycosidase
activity of both recombinant and native PD-L1 was determined
on hsDNA and poly(A) substrates (Fig. 3). PD-L2 and PD-L4
were also assayed for comparison. As previously reported
for native PD-Ls, the deadenylation activity was found to
be higher when the glycosylation decreases11 with both
substrates. Interestingly, a higher adenine release was obtained
for rPD-L1 with respect to native PD-Ls when DNA was used
as substrate (Fig. 3A). This finding was further confirmed
when the smaller and homogeneous poly(A) was used as
substrate (Fig. 3B). In this instance, an increase of the
deadenylation activity of more than two-fold was measured
for rPD-L1 with respect to the native protein.
Table 1 Data collection and refinement statistics
nPD-L1 adenine
A. Data collectionSpace group C2Unit-cell parameters a,b,c (A); b (1) 161.72, 34.74, 121.29; 128.01
Resolution (A) 1.65N. of unique reflections 56763Average redundancy 4.2 (2.5)Rmerge (%) 9.0 (7.0)Completeness (%) 92.8 (85.3)Mean I/s(I) 6.7 (2.0)
B. RefinementResolution shell (A) 10.00–1.65Rwork (%) 19.6Rfree (%) 25.1No. residues Protein 522
Water 650Average Bfactors (A2) Protein 18.5
Water 28.5r.m.s. deviations Bond lengths (A) 0.008
Bond angles (1) 1.2
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell (1.69–1.65 A).
This journal is �c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 570–579 | 573
Dow
nloa
ded
on 1
5 Se
ptem
ber
2010
Publ
ishe
d on
21
Janu
ary
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9198
01F
View Online
Fig. 1 (A) Elution profile from the cation exchange chromatography on a Source 15S column of recombinant PD-L1. The dotted line
indicates the increase of the conductivity gradient (mS cm�1). The SDS-PAGE analysis of the eluted peaks is reported in the inset.
Lane 1: molecular weight markers; lanes 2–4: peaks 1–3 from FPLC. (B) Deconvoluted mass spectrum of rPD-L1 by ESI/Q-TOF mass
spectrometry.
574 | Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 570–579 This journal is �c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Dow
nloa
ded
on 1
5 Se
ptem
ber
2010
Publ
ishe
d on
21
Janu
ary
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9198
01F
View Online
Interaction of PD-L1 with adenine
In an attempt to understand the differences in the enzymatic
properties of nPD-L1 and rPD-L1, we investigated the
interaction between the two enzymes and adenine, the major
product of their enzymatic reaction. PD-L1 contains two
tryptophan residues, one of which (Trp 207) is situated in
the protein active site (Fig. 4). Therefore, we used fluorescence
spectroscopy to investigate the protein–adenine interaction
by exciting the tryptophan fluorescence at the maximum
quantum yield (280 nm). As a result, we observed that adenine
titration of nPD-L1 produced a remarkable shift in the
fluorescence emission spectrum toward lower wavelengths.
Indeed, in the presence of 5 adenine equivalents (moles of
adenine per mole of protein), the wavelength corresponding to
the fluorescence spectrum maximum moved from lmax 347 nm
(in the absence of adenine) to lmax 320 nm. Further adenine
addition produced a clear quenching of the fluorescence
intensity in nPD-L1, corresponding to about 50% of the
global fluorescence (Fig. 5A). A parallel fluorescence
experiment showed that adenine titration produced a different
effect on rPD-L1, as only the fluorescence intensity quenching
was observed, without the lmax shift (Fig. 5B). A similar result
was observed titrating PD-L4 with adenine (Fig. 5C). The
blue-shift observed upon binding of adenine to nPD-L1 is
compatible with either a different binding mode of adenine or
with a participation of glycan chains to the adenine binding.
To validate these hypotheses, we determined the crystal
structure of nPD-L1 in complex with adenine and compared
it to the available structure of its non-glycosylated homolog
PD-L4. The crystal structure was refined at high resolution
(1.65 A) and provided well-defined electron density maps
(Table 1 and Fig. 6). Analysis of the catalytic site showed that
adenine exhibited the same binding mode observed in the
structure of PD-L4, and it was anchored through several
hydrogen bonding interactions (Fig. 6). Similar to what
observed in the structure of PD-L4, adenine forms a stacking
interaction with the phenol ring of Tyr72 (Fig. 6), consistent
with the role of adenine carrier attributed to this residue.22 The
architecture of nPD-L1 catalytic site shows that, beside Tyr72,
another Tyr residue (Tyr122) composes the adenine binding
cleft (Fig. 6). This suggests that the shift in fluorescence spectra
upon adenine addition (Fig. 5A) reflects changes in accessibility
of interacting Trp and Tyr residues, given the overlapping
excitation wavelengths of Trp (280 nm) and Tyr (275 nm).
Despite the high quality of the density maps, no structure of
the glycan chains bound to Asn43 and to Asn255, which are
located just aside the active site cleft (Fig. 4), could be
modelled. As for the sugar chain bound to Asn10, on the
opposite side of the active site cleft, we modelled only one
N-acetyl-glucosamine sugar whereas other sugar rings were
not detectable in the electron density according to a large
conformational mobility of sugar chains.
Cellular uptake of rPD-L1 and native PD-Ls
It has been reported that single chain type 1 RIPs and the free
A subunit of type 2 RIPs can be internalized within cells.23
With the aim to investigate the cellular uptake of native PD-Ls
and rPD-L1, internalization experiments in NIH3T3 cells were
performed.
All native PD-Ls and rPD-L1 were internalized as attested
by the protein associated fluorescence present throughout the
Fig. 2 Thermal denaturation profile of (A) rPD-L1 and (B) of nPD-L1.
Insets report overlays of CD spectra at 20 1C (plain line), 40 1C
(dashed line) and 90 1C (dotted line).
Fig. 3 Adenine polynucleotide glycosidase activity of native PD-L1,
PD-L2 and recombinant PD-L1 assayed on hsDNA (A) and poly(A)
(B). Released adenine was measured spectrophotometrically at
260 nm. BSA was used as negative control.
This journal is �c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 570–579 | 575
Dow
nloa
ded
on 1
5 Se
ptem
ber
2010
Publ
ishe
d on
21
Janu
ary
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9198
01F
View Online
cytoplasm after 72 h of incubation (Fig. 7). A time course
experiment revealed a similar behaviour also after 24 and 48 h
of incubation (data not shown). It could be noted that
fluorescent proteins were in some instances distributed as
grain, likely indicative of a vesicular distribution. This peculiar
distribution appeared to be more evident when the glyco-
sylation degree decreased, as in the case of PD-L3 and
PD-L4 (Fig. 7, panels D and E, respectively). More interestingly,
a vesicular distribution was also revealed for rPD-L1
compared to native glycosylated PD-L1 and PD-L2 (Fig. 7,
panels F, B and C, respectively).
Discussion
N-glycosylation, a widely occurring co-translational modification
of plant proteins, starts in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)
by the transfer of a core oligosaccharide unit to specific
asparagine residue(s) of the nascent polypeptide chain.
Fig. 4 3D model of PD-L1. The two tryptophanyl residues (Trp207
and Trp236) are reported in red and the three glycosylation sites on
Asn10, Asn43 and Asn255 are reported in green.
Fig. 5 Overlay of fluorescence spectra upon adenine addition, in the 0–50 equivalent range. Adenine titrations were performed with (A) nPD-L1,
(B) rPD-L1 and (C) PD-L4.
Fig. 6 (2Fo-Fc) electron density map, contoured at 2s, of the
catalytic site of nPD-L1 complexed with adenine.
576 | Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 570–579 This journal is �c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Dow
nloa
ded
on 1
5 Se
ptem
ber
2010
Publ
ishe
d on
21
Janu
ary
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9198
01F
View Online
Processing of this oligosaccharide into high-mannose-type,
paucimannosidic-type or complex-type N-glycans occurs in
the secretory pathway as the glycoprotein moves from the ER,
through the Golgi complex, to its final destination.24,25
It has become evident that protein glycosylation is of utmost
importance for the structure and biological function of several
proteins, being involved in proteins conformation, stability,
solubility and activity. In addition, N-linked oligosaccharides
may contain targeting information for protein sorting within
the appropriate cell compartments.24,25 The effect of glycan
chains on protein folding, stability and biological activity has
been studied for several glycoproteins from various sources,
giving extremely diverse and sometime conflicting results.25–27
Some type 1 and type 2 RIPs, isolated from different
biological sources, are glycosylated. Several studies aimed to
investigate the potential influence of carbohydrate moieties on
RIP biological activity have been reported for type 2 RIPs.
It has been reported that sugars have no effect on ribo-
some-inactivating activities, as recombinant proteins, expressed
in heterologous systems (i.e. ricin and volkensin A chains),
retained full biological activity.28,29 The structural character-
ization of the oligosaccharide chains of several type 1 RIPs
has also been widely exploited, revealing the occurrence of a
well-defined paucimannosidic N-glycosylation pattern, observed
for most of known vacuolar glycoproteins.11,12,30–32
Despite the intensive research on RIP biochemical and
functional characterization, also finalized to their interesting
application in therapy against viral infections or malignancies,
little is known about the role of glycan chains in their
conformation and stability, likely due to the difficulty in
obtaining high resolution diffracting crystals for glycosylated
proteins. Furthermore, structural characterization of glycan
chains is usually hampered by their large conformational
freedom. Only in rare cases, like the recently determined
structure of cucurmosin, a novel type 1 RIP isolated from
Cucurbita moschata, the structure of glycan chains is stabilized
by intermolecular contacts in the crystal.31
Three glycosylated variants (glycoforms) with the standard
paucimannosidic oligosaccharide and a fourth unglycosylated
isoform have been isolated and characterized from P. dioica
leaves, as previously discussed. The two primary differentially
glycosylated structures (PD-Ls1/2 and PD-Ls 3/4) have 81.6%
sequence identity.11 The most glycosylated isoform, PD-L1,
has been used as a model to specifically investigate the
influence of carbohydrate moieties on type 1 RIP structural
conformation and functional activities. To this aim, the PD-L1
Fig. 7 Cellular uptake of rPD-L1 and native PD-Ls by NIH3T3 cells. For each isoform, a schematic representation of primary structure and
glycan moiety is reported on the right. Magnification 1600�.
This journal is �c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 570–579 | 577
Dow
nloa
ded
on 1
5 Se
ptem
ber
2010
Publ
ishe
d on
21
Janu
ary
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9198
01F
View Online
synthetic gene was expressed in the E. coli heterologous
system. The expressed recombinant PD-L1 was renaturated,
purified and assayed for protein synthesis inhibition in a cell
free system and for adenine polynucleotide glycosidase activity
on hsDNA and poly (A). We did not find a reduction of
activity measured as IC50 (i.e. the amount of enzyme to inhibit
protein synthesis by 50%). However, the lack of carbohydrate
moieties in PD-L1 affects the adenine polynucleotide
glycosidase activity measured as adenine release from DNA
and poly (A), in comparison with both native PD-L1 and
PD-L2. The observed catalytic activity increase is more
evident with the poly (A) substrate, likely due to the higher
abundance of adenines in this substrate and/or to its smaller
dimension.13 Whereas total removal of glycans results in the
62% increase of adenine release activity on poly(A), the lack
of only one glycan in PD-L2 (Asn255), produces a 37%
adenine release increase compared to PD-L1. To further
investigate this issue, we analyzed the interactions of
nPD-L1 and of its recombinant form rPD-L1 with adenine,
the product of the de-adenylation reaction. Using fluorescence
spectroscopy, we observed that binding of adenine to nPD-L1
induces a remarkable blue-shift (17 nm) of the fluorescence
emission wavelength, and a strong intensity quenching. This
wavelength shift was not observed upon binding of adenine to
either rPD-L1 or PD-L4, which is not glycosylated (Fig. 5). By
determining the crystal structure of nPD-L1 in complex with
adenine, we show that adenine binding pocket includes two
Tyr residues (Tyr72 and Tyr122) and Trp207 (Fig. 6). The
binding mode of adenine as well as the conformation of
residues belonging to the catalytic site are superimposable to
those revealed in the complex of the homologue PD-L4 with
adenine.22 Therefore, the blue-shift observed for nPD-L1 but
not for PD-L4 (Fig. 5) is not to be ascribed to a change in the
adenine interaction with the catalytic site residues. Blue-shifts
are often associated with an increase in hydrophobicity
around aromatic rings. Consistently, a similar blue-shift in
tryptophan emission maximum was recently observed upon
binding of glycolipids to the human glycolipid binding protein,
an event which severely limits the solvent accessibility of the
tryptophan.33 The crystal structure of nPD-L1 also shows that
glycan chains of nPD-L1 are endowed with a large structural
mobility, as electron density did not allow sugar modelling.
Altogether, these results suggest that although flexible and not
detectable by crystallographic methods, glycan chains severely
hamper solvent accessibility to the aromatic residues located
in the catalytic site (Fig. 6, Trp207, Tyr72 and Tyr122).
Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the presence
of multiple glycosylation sites surrounding the active site could
be responsible of a reduced accessibility to substrates and,
therefore, of the observed reduced enzymatic efficiency
measured as adenine release of nPD-L1.
It has been reported that single chain type 1 RIPs and the
free A subunits of type 2 RIPs can be internalized by cells.23
To further investigate the cellular uptake of native
glycosylated PD-Ls and rPD-L1, preliminary internalization
experiments in NIH3T3 cells were performed. Under the used
experimental conditions we found that both native PD-Ls and
rPD-L1 were internalized. Interestingly, a peculiar distribution
in grains, indicative of a vesicular compartmentalization was
revealed. From the comparison of native PD-L1 and PD-L2
with rPD-L1, this distribution appeared to be related to the
glycosylation degree. Notably, this behaviour is independent
from the recognition of the mannosylated glycoproteins,
as NIH3T3 cells lack mannose receptors,34,35 known to be
responsible for their differential uptake by macrophages and
non-parenchymal cells of liver.36–38 It has been shown that
type 1 RIPs and the free A subunits of type 2 RIPs can be
cytotoxic at high concentrations.23 Initially it was thought that
the single chain toxins might enter cells via passive mechanisms
such as fluid phase uptake.37 This hypothesis has been revised
as different type 1 RIPs display an organ-specific toxicity and
cell types show a variable sensitivity to RIPs. These evidences
suggest that specific mechanism(s) occur to allow type 1 RIPs
uptake. A study of the uptake of gelonin has suggested that
this RIP, when internalised by pinocytosis, is released from
endosomes and lysosomes,38,39 although the mechanism by
which this is achieved is completely unknown. Furthermore it
is also known that saporin, a type 1 unglycosylated RIP, can
be internalized by the interaction with specific receptors (alpha
2-macroglobulin or LRP receptors40) leading to an intra-
cellular pathway that involves the endo-lysosomal system but
never the classical Golgi pathway followed by whole ricin.41,42
Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of
the cellular entry pathway of PD-Ls. Although a detailed
study of PD-Ls internalization is beyond the scope of the
present work, it will be of interest to perform subcellular
localization experiments aimed to identify the intracellular
compartments involved in the delivery of type 1 RIPs
within cells by using specific markers and laser scanning
microscopy.43 These studies could be useful to understand
the differences at the basis of type 1 internalization mechanisms,
important for the design of approaches for targeted cell
delivery.
Overall, the presented data confirm that the removal of
glycan moieties from type 1 RIPs does not affect the biological
activity in terms of protein synthesis inhibition. However, the
removal of carbohydrate chains significantly increases the
deadenylation capability, likely as a consequence of the
increased accessibility of substrates to the active site pocket.
Furthermore, preliminary data on cellular uptake showed that
all PD-Ls isoforms are internalized and, for the first time, that
the vesicular distribution within cells could be influenced by
the protein glycosylation degree.
Abbreviations
RIPs Ribosome-inactivating proteins;
IPTG Isopropyl-b-thiogalactopyranoside;APG Adenine polynucleotide glycosylase;
Man Mannose;
GlcNAc N-acetyl-D-glucosamine;
Fuc Fucose;
Xyl Xylose;
GSH Reduced glutathione;
GSSG Oxidized glutathione;
NaP Na phosphate buffer;
PVDF Polyvinylidene difluoride;
CD Circular Dichroism;
578 | Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 570–579 This journal is �c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Dow
nloa
ded
on 1
5 Se
ptem
ber
2010
Publ
ishe
d on
21
Janu
ary
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9198
01F
View Online
hsDNA Herring sperm DNA;
ER Endoplasmic reticulum;
DAPI 40,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by funds from the Second University
of Naples and University of L’Aquila and by grants from the
Ministero Istruzione, Universita e Ricerca (MIUR, Italy) and
by FIRB no. RBRN07BMCT.
References
1 L. Barbieri, M. G. Battelli and F. Stirpe, Biochim. Biophys. Acta,1993, 1154, 237–282.
2 F. Stirpe, A. Gasperi-Campani, L. Barbieri, A. Falasca,A. Abbondanza and W. A. Stevens, Biochem. J., 1983, 216,617–625.
3 F. Stirpe, S. Bailey, S. P. Miller and J. W. Bodley, Nucleic AcidsRes., 1988, 16, 1349–1357.
4 Y. Endo, K. Tsurugi and J. M. Lambert, Biochem. Biophys. Res.Commun., 1988, 150, 1032–1036.
5 T. A. Walsh, A. E. Morgan and T. D. Hey, J. Biol. Chem., 1991,266, 23422–23427.
6 S. Reinbothe, C. Reinbothe, J. Lehmann, W. Becker, K. Apel andB. Parthier, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1994, 91, 7012–7016.
7 W. J. Peumans, Q. Hao and E. J. Van Damme, FASEB J., 2001,15, 1493–1506.
8 A. Bolognesi, L. Polito, C. Lubelli, L. Barbieri, A. Parente andF. Stirpe, J. Biol. Chem., 2002, 277, 13709–13716.
9 L. Barbieri, P. Valbonesi, E. Bonora, P. Gorini, A. Bolognesi andF. Stirpe, Nucleic Acids Res., 1997, 25, 518–522.
10 A. Di Maro, P. Valbonesi, A. Bolognesi, F. Stirpe, P. De Luca,G. Siniscalco Gigliano, L. Gaudio, P. Delli Bovi, P. Ferranti,A. Malorni and A. Parente, Planta, 1999, 208, 125–131.
11 A. Di Maro, A. Chambery, V. Carafa, S. Costantini, G. Colonnaand A. Parente, Biochimie, 2009, 91, 352–363.
12 A. Chambery, A. Di Maro and A. Parente, Phytochemistry, 2008,69, 1973–1982.
13 A. Chambery, M. Pisante, A. Di Maro, E. Di Zazzo, M. Ruvo,S. Costantini, G. Colonna and A. Parente, Proteins: Struct.,Funct., Bioinf., 2007, 67, 209–218.
14 A. Di Maro, A. Chambery, A. Daniele, P. Casoria and A. Parente,Phytochemistry, 2007, 68, 767–776.
15 A. Ruggiero, A. Di Maro, V. Severino, A. Chambery andR. Berisio, Biopolymers, 2009, 91, 1135–1142.
16 W. Minor, D. Tomchick and Z. Otwinowski, Structure, 2000, 8,R105–110.
17 E. Potterton, P. Briggs, M. Turkenburg and E. Dodson, ActaCrystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr., 2003, 59, 1131–1137.
18 G. N. Murshudov, A. A. Vagin and E. J. Dodson, ActaCrystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr., 1997, 53, 240–255.
19 R. J. Morris, A. Perrakis and V. S. Lamzin, Methods Enzymol.,2003, 374, 229–244.
20 A. G. Ferrige, M. J. Seddon, B. N. Green, S. A. Jarvis andJ. Skilling, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 1992, 6,707–711.
21 D. Shental-Bechor and Y. Levy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.,2008, 105, 8256–8261.
22 A. Ruggiero, A. Chambery, A. Di Maro, A. Parente andR. Berisio, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf., 2008, 71, 8–15.
23 L. M. Roberts and J. M. Lord, Mini Rev Med Chem, 2004, 4,505–512.
24 C. Rayon, P. Lerouge and L. Faye, J. Exp. Bot., 1998, 49,1463–1472.
25 A. Ceriotti, M. Duranti and R. Bollini, J. Exp. Bot., 1998, 49,1091–1103.
26 A. Helenius and M. Aebi, Science, 2001, 291, 2364–2369.27 A. Helenius and M. Aebi, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 2004, 73,
1019–1049.28 M. O’Hare, L. M. Roberts, P. E. Thorpe, G. J. Watson, B. Prior
and J. M. Lord, FEBS Lett., 1987, 216, 73–78.29 A. Chambery, A. Di Maro, M. M. Monti, F. Stirpe and
A. Parente, Eur. J. Biochem., 2004, 271, 108–117.30 X. Hou, M. Chen, L. Chen, E. J. Meehan, J. Xie and M. Huang,
BMC Struct. Biol., 2007, 7, 29.31 X. Hou, E. J. Meehan, J. Xie, M. Huang, M. Chen and L. Chen,
J. Struct. Biol., 2008, 164, 81–87.32 T. Daubenfeld, M. Hossann, W. E. Trommer and G.
Niedner-Schatteburg, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2005,333, 984–989.
33 X. Zhai, M. L. Malakhova, H. M. Pike, L. M. Benson,H. R. Bergen, 3rd, I. P. Sugar, L. Malinina, D. J. Patel andR. E. Brown, J. Biol. Chem., 2009, 284, 13620–13628.
34 E. Hebert and M. Monsigny, Biol. Cell, 1994, 81, 73–76.35 S. Kawakami, A. Sato, M. Nishikawa, F. Yamashita and
M. Hashida, Gene Ther., 2000, 7, 292–299.36 M. Colaco, S. Misquith, M. M. Bapat, S. Wattiaux-De Coninck
and R. Wattiaux, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2004, 319,1299–1306.
37 F. Stirpe, L. Barbieri, M. G. Battelli, M. Soria and D. A. Lappi,Bio/Technology, 1992, 10, 405–412.
38 P. K. Selbo, K. Sandvig, V. Kirveliene and K. Berg, Biochim.Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj., 2000, 1475, 307–313.
39 M. Colaco, M. M. Bapat, S. Misquith, M. Jadot, S. Wattiaux-DeConinck and R. Wattiaux, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2002,296, 1180–1185.
40 U. Cavallaro, A. Nykjaer, M. Nielsen and M. R. Soria, Eur. J.Biochem., 1995, 232, 165–171.
41 R. Ippoliti, E. Lendaro, P. A. Benedetti, M. R. Torrisi, F. Belleudi,D. Carpani, M. R. Soria and M. S. Fabbrini, FASEB J., 2000, 14,1335–1344.
42 R. Vago, C. J. Marsden, J. M. Lord, R. Ippoliti, D. J. Flavell,S. U. Flavell, A. Ceriotti and M. S. Fabbrini, FEBS J., 2005, 272,4983–4995.
43 M. Moisenovich, A. Tonevitsky, I. Agapov, H. Niwa, H. Scheweand J. Bereiter-Hahn, Eur. J. Cell Biol., 2002, 81, 529–538.
This journal is �c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 570–579 | 579
Dow
nloa
ded
on 1
5 Se
ptem
ber
2010
Publ
ishe
d on
21
Janu
ary
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9198
01F
View Online