Technical Assistance Consultant's Report - Asian Development Bank

Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report

This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design.

Project Number: 49387-001

June 2018

Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Second GMS Tourism Infrastructure for Inclusive Growth Project (Financed by ADB PPTA)

The document is prepared by Norconsult AS(NORWAY) in association with NORCONSULT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. (PHILIPPINES) For Ministry of Information, Culture and Tourism, Lao PDR

Appendix 20: Consultation and Participation Plan

TA9090-REG: Preparing the Second Greater Mekong Subregion Tourism

Infrastructure for Inclusive Growth Project

FINAL REPORT – PART C

June 2018

Lao People’s Democratic Republic:

Second Greater Mekong Subregion Tourism Infrastructure

for Inclusive Growth Project

Appendix 20

711

A. INTRODUCTION

1. ADB’s Safeguards Policy Statement (2009), and the governments of Cambodia, the Lao PDR, and Viet Nam (CLV), promote meaningful stakeholder consultations during the entire project cycle. Meaningful consultation is a process that (i) begins early in the project preparation stage and continues throughout the project cycle; (ii) provides timely disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is understandable and readily accessible to affected people; (iii) is undertaken in an atmosphere free of intimidation or coercion; (iv) is gender inclusive and responsive, and tailored to the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable groups; and (v) enables all relevant views of affected people and other stakeholders to be incorporated into decision making related to project design, mitigation measures, the sharing of development benefits and opportunities, and implementation issues. ADB requires borrowers/clients to engage with communities, groups, or people affected by projects proposed, and with civil society through information disclosure, consultation, and informed participation in a manner commensurate with the risks to and impacts on affected communities.1 2. Consistent with ADB and CLV’s commitment to meaningful stakeholder engagement, the project’s consultation and participation plan aims to:

fully disclose all information related to the project, its goals and objectives, components and activities to all recipient communities, their constituents, and other project stakeholders;

obtain information from project beneficiaries and other stakeholders regarding their views and opinions, needs, priorities and preferences on how the project should be implemented;

encourage stakeholder participation in project activities that affect them, including civil works, capacity building and enterprise support programs, awareness raising activities, and monitoring;

obtain stakeholder consent and cooperation;

establish a clear, easily accessible and effective grievance redress mechanism; and

ensure transparency in all project activities.

B. CONSULTATION DURING PROJECT DESIGN

3. A stakeholder analysis was prepared by international and national social development specialists. The analysis identified key project actors, their interests in the project, the problems they face in realizing their interests, organizational resources, mandated responsibilities, and strategies to maximize stakeholder participation during implementation. Information was gathered through workshops, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, household surveys, and individual consultations. Intotal, 2 workshops, about 71 stakeholdermeetings/focus group discussion, 18 public consultation meetings, and two surveys (HH and IOL) were conducted in three project provinces ( Vientiane, Champasak and Luang Prabang), involving approximately 1,303 stakeholders ( of which 344 are females)

4. Focus group discussions and key informant interviews with district, commune and village officials clarified project expectations and local priorities for tourism and urban development,

1 ADB. 2009. Safeguard Policy Statement. pp. 20. Manila.

Appendix 20

712

explained the projects potential socioeconomic benefits, and confirmed that these are aligned with national and local development plans. Discussions with commune/village coordinators responsible for women’s and ethnic affairs identified strategies to ensure that the project will equitably benefit women, ethnic groups and other vulnerable groups, considering their specific needs and preferences. The key entities consulted are listed below.

1. Lao People’s Democratic Republic

Tourism Development Department, Ministry of Information, Culture and Tourism; Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare; Ministry of Public Works and Transport; Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources; and Ministry of Finance;

Lao Women’s Union, Lao Front for National Construction, and Lao Youth Union representatives;

provincial departments of information, culture and tourism and public works and transport in Champassak, Vientiane and Luang Prabang; Vang Vieng, Keo Oudom and Khong district tourism offices, and Vang Vieng Urban Development Administration Authority;

provincial, district and village Lao Women’s Union, Lao Front for National Construction and Lao Youth Union representatives;

civil society organizations and development partners (e.g. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Japan International Cooperation Agency, Lux-Development, and Swisscontact);

tourism industry associations, e.g. Lao Hotel Association and Lao Association of Travel Agents;

local transport and urban service providers, hotels, guesthouses, restaurants, retail shops, community tourism groups, and other tourism industry actors; and

men and women living within and adjacent to the project sites.

local transport and urban service providers, hotels, guesthouses, restaurants, retail shops, community tourism groups, and other tourism industry actors; and

men and women living within and adjacent to the project sites.

C. CONSULTATION DURING PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

5. Consultations will continue throughout project implementation, regularly referencing the information gathered during initial consultations with various stakeholder groups. The key stakeholders to be consulted, objectives of involvement, mechanisms for participation, agencies responsible for leading/organizing consultations, timing, and budget source are in the consultation and participation plan (Error! Reference source not found.).

D. STAKEHOLDER COMMUNICATION STRATEGY

Appendix 20

713

6. The project’s stakeholder communication strategy (Error! Reference source not found.2)

draws on good practices outlined in ADB’s Public Communication Policy.2 It is based on the principles of transparency, timeliness, meaningful participation, and inclusion of all project stakeholders, particularly women, ethnic groups, and other intended project beneficiaries. The strategy will ensure project stakeholders receive timely, reliable and correct information about the project and have opportunities to give feedback to address implementation issues. Key stakeholders include: (i) direct and indirect project beneficiaries, emphasizing micro and small enterprises and their employees; (ii) community tourism groups; (iii) mass organizations responsible for ethic, women’s, and youth affairs; (iv) tourism industry associations; (v) civil society organizations and other development partners; (vi) government agencies responsible for tourism and public infrastructure management; and (viii) international and domestic tourists. The strategy informs and supports community and private sector development, institutional strengthening to support sustainable tourism and climate resilient green urban development, and mitigation of any potential negative impacts.

2 ADB. 2011. Public Communication Policy 2011. Disclosure and Exchange of Information. Manila.

Appendix 20

714

Table 1: Consultation and Participation Plan

Stakeholder Group Objective of Their

Involvement

Participation Approach

(Depth)

Participation Methods Entity Responsible

Timing Budget Source

Beneficiary communities, mobile vendors, shop owners, hotel operators and boat and vehicle associations at tourist sites, representatives of poor and vulnerable households, ethnic groups, and women

Directly benefit from project infrastructure interventions, participants’ tourism-related skills training, tourism standards implementation, and management training

Collaboration

(High)

Information: Community meetings to disseminate information about project scope, design elements, participation mechanisms (e.g. community tourism groups), and entitlements for person affected by involuntary resettlement impacts; also, awareness building on HIV/AIDS, human trafficking, core labor standards and road safety, using brochures, posters, and seminars

Consultation: With residents, business owners/vendors, hotel and guest house operators at subproject sites regarding affordability if any changes to fees and public services provided; training needs assessment for vendors and women interested in skills training and tourism management; village meetings and focus group discussions on measures to enhance benefits, and mitigate risks of adverse impacts; detailed measurement survey and consultations on compensation, eligibilities, entitlement, grievance redress for persons/business owners/operators affected by land acquisition and resettlement. Also, consultations with women about participation during construction as unskilled laborers

Decisions: Community members determine the nature and extent of participation and guidelines for community tourism groups and tourism associations, with support from village leaders and mass organizations, to ensure they are needs-based, and inclusive, with representation of ethnic groups, women, and other interested subgroups

PCUs, PIUs, mass organizations, community leaders, and consultants

Project inception; infrastructure subproject detailed design; continuing throughout project implementation

Output 2 and 3 capacity building activities, RPs, GAP, and IPPs

Tourism site management committees

Direct beneficiaries with specific responsibilities for infrastructure O&M at project sites

Partnership

(High)

Consultations: Community meetings to assess training and capacity building needs for infrastructure O&M and priorities for destination management, tourism services marketing and promotion strategies

Decisions: Revenue allocation for infrastructure

PCUs, PIUs, committee/ association leaders, and consultants

Infrastructure subproject detailed design, throughout project implementation

Output 2 and 3 institutional strengthening and training activities

Appendix 20

715


Involvement


(Depth)



O&M, training and promotion activities

Community tourism groups

Existing/newly created groups that facilitate community inputs into the design of training and other project interventions, as well as involvement of women and ethnic groups in decision-making

Collaboration

(High)

Consultations: Community meetings to gather suggestions for infrastructure detailed design features and the community’s role in tourist site management. Also, propose topics for training design and implementation

Decisions: On concepts, implementation modality, duration and schedules of capacity development activities such as awareness-raising, training, and other support to tourism site management and micro and small enterprises

Project implementation: Community focal points appointed to coordinate between project staff and community; and disseminate project-related information

Monitoring: On-site contractor monitoring, review training progress, and report to PIUs

PCUs, PIUs, mass organizations, commune/ village leaders, and consultants

Throughout project implementation

Output 2 and 3 institutional strengthening and training activities

Mass organizations (e.g. women’s unions, agencies responsible for ethnic and youth affairs)

Represent interests of women, ethnic groups and youth.

Collaboration (High)

Project management and implementation: Direct consultations and participation in project implementation through PIU membership and project steering committee representation

Strategic decision making: Contribute to destination management decisions, RP, GAP and IPP implementation

Monitoring: Provincial steering committee representation, district resettlement committees, and commune/village construction monitoring groups

PIUs, mass organizations, commune/ village leaders

Throughout project implementation

RPs, GAPs, IPP, and Output 3 institutional strengthening activities

Private businesses associations and chambers of commerce

Private sector participation for destination management and marketing

Partnership (High)

Consultation: Meetings and individual consultations on emerging needs and issues affecting tourism and the business environment

Strategic decision making: Meetings and forums to gain public and private consensus on destination management frameworks, industry standards, and marketing and promotion directions

PCUs and PIUs

Quarterly destination management network meetings

Output 2 and 3 institutional strengthening activities

Provincial and district Effective and efficient project management

Collaboration Approvals: Review and approve annual work PCUs and Annual steering committee

Output 3 institutional

Appendix 20

716


Involvement


(Depth)



governments and implementation (High) plans and budgets, safeguard documents, civil works design, tendering, and contracts, and tourism/urban services management contracts

Project implementation: Appoint PIU staff and designate public representatives to destination management organizations, procurement committees, and resettlement committees

Monitoring: Provincial and national steering committee, project planning and review workshops, resettlement committees, and destination management network participation. Provide policy guidance and mediate project-related disputes if necessary

PIUs

meeting, and as needed during project implementation

strengthening activities

Government departments involved in national and subregional and steering committees

Establish and implement project policies and guidelines, coordination and approval mechanisms

Collaboration (Medium)

Policy guidance and approvals: Meetings to review and approve annual workplans and budgets; and approve periodic progress reports and safeguards monitoring reports. Subregional project steering committee coordinates subregional marketing, ASEAN tourism standards implementation, and other joint activities among participating countries, development partners, and private sector advisory groups

PCUs, PIUs, and Mekong Tourism Coordinating Office

Each committee meets at least once per year

Output 2 and 3 institutional strengthening activities and project management

ASEAN = Association of Southeast Asian Nations, GAP = gender action plan, IPP = indigenous peoples plan; MSME = micro, small, and medium-sized enterprise, O&M = operation and maintenance, PCU = project coordination unit, PIU = project implementation unit, RP = resettlement plan.

Appendix 20

717

Table 2: Stakeholder Communication Strategy

Objective Stakeholder

Groups Main Interests Messages Means of Communication Timeline Responsibility

Project stakeholders receive timely, reliable, and correct information about the project

Beneficiary communities

Benefit from new economic opportunities; social and environmental sustainability; users of improved infrastructure and services

Stakeholder cooperation and support is important to achieve successful outcomes; non-coercive information to be shared openly and transparently

Presentations, discussions, and document dissemination at planning meetings, workshops, awareness seminars, project website, and training activities

Project inception and frequently during implementation

PCUs, PIUs, and commune/village offices


Economic opportunities; social and environmental sustainability; manage tourism services and attractions

Community participation is important for sustainable destination management

Presentations, discussions and document dissemination during planning meetings, workshops, awareness seminars, and training


PCUs, PIUs, and commune/village offices

Tourism industry associations and MSMEs

Economic opportunities and trained workers; destination marketing and promotion; industry standards; main tourism service providers

Public-private collaboration is important for training design and sustainable destination management

Presentations, discussions and document dissemination during meetings, workshops, awareness seminars, and training; project and MTCO websites

Frequently during implementation

PCUs, PIUs, industry associations, and MTCO

Mass organizations, i.e. women’s unions, agencies responsible for ethnic and youth affairs

RP, GAP and IPP implemented, (e.g. disclosure, entitlements, grievance redress mechanisms); equal opportunities for all

ADB and government safeguards policies will be followed closely, all affected persons are entitled to fair compensation

Separate meetings with women and ethnic groups in local language when needed; resettlement committee meetings; safeguards document disclosure on project and ADB websites; project’s public information booklet


PIUs together with relevant mass organizations

Civil society organizations and other development partners

Advocacy, knowledge, and finance to achieve positive development outcomes; safeguards compliance

The project seeks collaboration and partnerships to boost its relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability

Presentations, discussions and document dissemination during project planning meetings, sector coordination meetings, GMS tourism working group; project and MTCO websites

Semi-annual meetings; websites updated monthly

PCUs, PIUs, and MTCO

Government agencies responsible for infrastructure and tourism

Sustainable infrastructure O&M; safeguards compliance; sustainable destination management

Works design and construction schedules published, transparent urban services tariffs and fees; RP, IEE-EMPs and IPP will be properly implemented

Workshops, seminars, individual consultations with affected persons; resettlement committee meetings and/or meetings with affected households

Project inception and as required during implementation

PCU and PIUs

International and domestic

Safe, accessible, well-managed tourism

Residents expect socially and environmentally responsible

Public signage, social media, NTO and MTCO websites,

Frequently PCU, PIUs, MTCO, and

Appendix 20

718



tourists destinations behavior brochures and another print media

commune/ village leaders

Stakeholders engage in planning, implementation and monitoring to build local ownership of project initiatives

Beneficiary communities

Equal access to benefits from new economic opportunities; social and environmental sustainability; sustainability and affordability of improved infrastructure and urban services

Local inputs are sought to ensure infrastructure, capacity building, and institutional strengthening activities are suitably designed and implemented; improved infrastructure and urban services will be affordable for residents

Project orientation and frequent public consultations to review project features and plans, and disclose monitoring mechanisms

Information about the project in local languages posted in strategic location in beneficiary communities

Brochures and posted information about upcoming training programs available in highly-visible, publicly accessible areas

Community representatives join semi-annual planning and review meetings


PIUs, mass organizations, and commune/village leaders


Access to quality training; retain stewardship of local tourism resources; tourism and urban services are well-managed

The project promotes community engagement in tourism and urban services management; community input is sought to design and implement training and information and education campaigns

Presentations, discussions and document dissemination during meetings, workshops, awareness seminars, and training activities; project information booklet


PCUs, PIUs, and commune/village leaders

Tourism industry associations and MSMEs

Manager and employee access to training and destination marketing support; enabling business environment

The project promotes industry-relevant training and public-private collaboration; project investments will improve the business environment for tourism; ASEAN tourism standards will improve service quality and build consumer confidence

Tourism industry events (e.g. annual Mekong Tourism Forum and ASEAN Tourism Forum); project and MTCO websites


PCUs, PIUs, and industry association members

Mass Equal access for women, The project will make special Community meetings, Frequently PCUs, PIUs,

Appendix 20

719



organizations, i.e. women’s unions, agencies responsible for ethnic and youth affairs

ethnic groups, and youth; prevent and mitigate negative social and environmental tourism impacts

provisions (e.g. scholarships, training vouchers and affirmative actions) to include women, ethnic groups, and youth, following the GAP and IPPs; information and education campaigns to raise awareness about good environmental practices, and prevention of human trafficking and HIV/AIDS

workshops, seminars, and training; project information booklet

during implementation

mass organizations, and commune/village leaders

Civil society organizations and other development partners

Good development coordination; development effectiveness

Civil society organizations and other development partners are openly invited to collaborate and coordinate with the project

Tourism industry events (e.g. annual Mekong Tourism Forum and ASEAN Tourism Forum); GMS and ASEAN tourism working group meetings; sector coordination meetings project and MTCO websites


PCUs and PIUs

Government agencies responsible for infrastructure and tourism

Institutional strengthening for sustainable infrastructure O&M and destination management

The project supports capacity building for public officials and will strengthen institutions responsible for tourism/urban management

Semi-annual planning and review meetings; annual workplans available on project websites


PCUs and PIUs

ADB = Asian Development Bank; ASEAN = Association of Southeast Asian Nations; EMP = environmental management plan; GAP = gender action plan; GMS = Greater Mekong Subregion; IEE = initial environmental examination; IPP = Indigenous Peoples Plan; MTCO = Mekong Tourism Coordinating Office; MSME = micro, small, and medium-sized enterprise; NTO = national tourism organization; O&M = operation and maintenance; RP = resettlement plan.

Appendix 21: Stakeholder Analysis

TA9090-REG: Preparing the Second Greater Mekong Subregion Tourism

Infrastructure for Inclusive Growth Project

FINAL REPORT – PART C

June 2018

Lao People’s Democratic Republic:

Second Greater Mekong Subregion Tourism Infrastructure

for Inclusive Growth Project

Appendix 21

721

Stakeholder Group Stakeholder Interest Perception of

Problem

Resources Mandate

Central/Local

Government

Ministry of Information,

Culture and Tourism

(MICT)

To ensure good

project management

and outcome

achievement.

Poor condition of the

infrastructure limits the

tourism and economic

development of the

provinces.

MICT budget and

manpower

Supervise management of tourism, cultural and

information services in Lao PDR.

MICT (Tourism Development Department) will

be the Executing Agency (EA) for the Project

Ministry of Public

Works and Transport

(MPWT)

To ensure the

technical requirement

for infrastructure work

follows approved

standards and is

maintained

MPWT budget and

manpower

Coordinate with MICT

Project Coordination

Unit (PCU – MICT

Tourism Development

Department (TDD)

To implement the

project and ensure

good management

(i) Administer the project imprest account; (ii)

project preparation, including the establishment

of financial and management systems and

procedures, procurement of equipment,

Consultant recruitment and supervision; (iii)

Preparation and submission of rolling annual

action plans, consolidating PCU-led activities

and workplans received from PIUs to the

NPSC; (iv) Ensuring compliance with grant

covenants and assurances in respect of all

subprojects and the good-governance

framework; (v) Facilitate updating and

coordinate with relevant agencies including

approval of and ensure compliance with IEE,

EMPs, GAP and resettlement plan; (vi) Review

and approval of goods and civil works

contracts, including bid documents; Approval of

payment to contractors and maintaining

disbursement records; (vii) Coordination

between the concerned agencies at the

Appendix 21

722


Problem

Resources Mandate

national and provincial levels; Coordination of

activities of the PIUs and the inputs of

concerned stakeholders; Coordination of all

reporting aspects of the project; Coordinate all

specified monitoring, evaluation and reporting

activities; `and (viii) Communication of project's

outcome, outputs, and activities to all

stakeholders.

Provincial Department

of Information, culture

and tourism (DICT)

To ensure sound

implementation of the

project through PIU.

Upgrade the

infrastructure for

tourism development

and community to

have better access

DICT human

resources

To assist provincial government and MICT to

manage the project at the local level.

Public Works and

Transport (DPWT)

Should be involved in

the field to contribute

to mobilizing villages.

Infrastructure is a

bottleneck for the

tourism development

of the district/ site

PWT District budget

and staff.

O&M of subproject infrastructure

Provincial Department

of Natural Resources

and Environment

(DONRE)

Environmental

management an

safeguards

Current environmental

conditions in the urban

centers affect the

living standard of the

population.

Current wastewater

management and solid

waste management

capacity restrictions

threaten the

environment.

DONRE Resource

constraints

Key responsibilities:

Preparation of the five-year Strategic Environment Plans.

Responsibility safeguards document review and approval.

Protection of local environment and water resources.

Provincial and District

Resettlement Office

Ensure resettlement or

land acquisition for

minimizing the impacts

and implement the

compensation delivery

Provincial and District

Resettlement Office -

budget and staff

constraints

Organise Resettlement Committees.

Appendix 21

723


Problem

Resources Mandate

system

Village Administration Getting most benefit

from the infrastructure

offered by the project.

Living standards

negatively affected by

current state of

infrastructure in the

villages.

Village Head and

various functional

committees.

Local administration at the grassroots level

under the supervision of the district or

municipality with functions to implement and

manage the tourism and socio-economic

development plans of the village, to ensure

security and order, to protect/conserve natural

resources and the environment within the

village.

Technical Agencies

Urban Development

Administration

Authority (UDAA)

Facilitate management

of the solid waste

collection services and

other O&M aspects of

their mandate (e.g.

soft landscaping and

recreation parks.

Solid waste collection

service covers only

part of the town.

Many smaller urban

roads are of poor

quality and without

drainage.

Wastewater treatment

and collection is

unsatisfactory.

UDAAs generally lack

financial resources

and highly depend on

allocations of the

government to cover

salaries and operation

costs.

Urban services management: Delegated to

plan, implement, manage, and control urban

development activities, including roads,

drainage, collection and disposal of waste,

sanitation and protection of the environment,

public lighting, preventing riverbank erosion,

construction and maintenance of public parks

and recreational areas, and tourism

management.

Civil society

Lao Women’s Union (LWU)

To protect women’s rights and interests,

including improved

livelihood

improvements.

Women’s socio-

economic positions

and livelihood

opportunities are

constrained by

numerous factors,

including lack of

vocational skills and

knowledge. Insufficient

participation of women

Lao Women’s Union budget and woman

power constraints.

Mass organization for women responding to

women’s development needs, promoting the status and role of women, promoting unity

amongst women of different ethnic groups and

social strata throughout the country.

Appendix 21

724


Problem

Resources Mandate

in decision-making

process.

Lao Front for National

Construction

Positive benefits for all

ethnic groups.

Socio-economic

development of

provinces suffers from

current infrastructure

conditions/constraints

Lao Front budget and

manpower constraints

To monitor the project and assist people if they

are negatively affected.

Chamber of

Commerce

Interest in tourism

development.

Interest in promotion

of organic farming and

other tourism value

chains..

Inadequate

infrastructure (social

resources and

transportation) is still

the main bottleneck for

attracting investments

to the provinces. .

Chambers of

Commerce budget

and resource

constraints. .

To support its members in developing business

opportunities.

Bus/Boat Operators

Association and other

users

Improved functionality

of the port for the

different purposes.

Better and more

business with tourist

river trips; cargo

transportation.

Existing river port

infrastructure not

optimal for tourism,

transportation and

border functions in the

Mekong river.

To promote the business and other interests of

their members,

Shop and restaurant

owners on the access

road to the river port,

Getting more people/

tourists to spend more

time in the port area.

Existing access road

and infrastructure

constrains business.

Chambers of Commerce to promote business

interests of their members

DICT = Department of Information, Culture and Tourism; DONRE = Department of Natural Resources and Environment; DPWT = Department of Public Works and Transport; EA = Executing Agency; GAP = Gender Action Plan; IEE = initial environmental examination; LWU = Lao Women’s Union; MICT = Ministry of Information, Culture and Tourism; MPWT = Ministry of Public Works and Transport; NPSC = National Project Steering Committee; NTO = national tourism organization; O&M = operation and maintenance; PCU = Project Coordination Unit; PIU = Project Implementation Unit; RP = resettlement plan; TDD = Tourism Development Department; UDAA = Urban Development Administration Authority.

Appendix 22

Appendix 22: Supplementary Information and Data

TA9090-REG: Preparing the Second Greater Mekong Subregion Tourism Infrastructure for Inclusive Growth Project FINAL REPORT – PART C June 2018

Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Second Greater Mekong Subregion Tourism Infrastructure for Inclusive Growth Project

Appendix 22

726

I. HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA

1. Household Survey Result Tables

Contents

1. Household Respondent Socio-Demographic Profile

1.1 Household Headship

1.2. Sex of respondent

1.3 Affected household by resettlement

2. Household Membership Socio-Demographic and Economic Profile

2.1. Total number of household member and Gender

2.2. Relationship to Household head

2.3. HHs members’ ages;

2.4. Household Members Highest educational attainment

2.5. Household members who contribute to household income;

2.6. If yes, employment status

2.7. Employment sector of activity

2.8. Household member working away from home

2.9 Household member working away from home contributing in the household/family income

2.10. Household’s ethnic background

2.11. HHs member who is a disabled

3. Household Assets Profile and Socio-Economic Situation in Community

3.1 Number of years household has lived in the community

3.2. Ownership to house/dwelling

3.3. Farmland Ownership and total in sq.mtrs.

3.4. Household subsistence from land owned/rented

3.5 Household ownership to vegetable gardens

3.6 Household subsistence from vegetables produced in the garden

3.7 List of crops planted/harvested and mode of selling of each crop harvested, partial or whole?

3.8 Location where household crops are sold/marketed

3.9 Socio-economic situation of most households in the community

3.10 Socio-economic situation of respondent household

3.11 Indicators of rich/well-off households in community (multiple responses)

3.12 Indicators of poor households in the community (multiple responses)

4. Access to Mobility and Telecommunications

4.1. Household ownership of a bicycle

4.2 Household ownership of a motorcycle

4.3. Household ownership to a television

4.4 Type of house

4.5. Household connection to electricity/power grid

4.6. Number of hours household has electricity

4.7. Households’ source of information/communication from national government

4.8. Households’ source of information/communication from local government 5. Access to Health

Appendix 22

727

5.1. Household’s Morbidity profile: Types of illnesses affecting family members (multiple responses) 5.2 Types of health facilities/personnel where and whom consulted when family member is ill (multiple responses)

5.3 Types of domestic water source of household (multiple responses)

5.4 Distance of house to water source (skip)

5.5. Of those households who accessed domestic water from a public tap ( skip)

5.5.1 Total amount of time consumed for collecting/fetching water (skip)

5.5.2. Who collect this? Gender and age (skip)

5.6 Households’ types of toilet facilities

6. Access to Education

6.1. Availability of primary school in the community;

6.2 Distance of primary school from houses of household respondents

6.3. Availability of secondary school in the community

6.4. Distance of secondary school from houses of household respondents

7. Household Income and Expenditures

7.1. Main source of income of households

7.2 Other sources of household income (multiple responses) 7.3. Amount of monthly and annual income from other non-tourism income sources of households (multiple responses);

7.4. Amount of monthly and annual household income from directly tourism-related sources of income

8. Consultation on Subproject and Tourism Development

8.1 Household Respondents’ Awareness on the Subproject

8.2 If yes, means/media of getting awareness on the subproject;

8.3 Respondents’ knowledge of the subproject plan

8.4 Subprojects Benefits to community, yes? And reasons why beneficial to community? (multiple responses)

8.5 If no benefits, why? (multiple responses)

8.6 People in the community who will benefit from the subproject

8.7 Nature of benefits per type of people in community (multiple responses)

8.8 Benefit of Subproject to respondent household? Yes, why? No why not (multiple responses)

8.9 Subproject’s impact to household respondent during construction (multiple responses) 8.10 Subproject’s impacts to household respondent after subproject completion (multiple responses) 8.11 Recommendations on changes of subproject to make it more beneficial and/or avoid its adverse impact to household respondent (multiple responses)

9. Willingness-to-pay for sanitation and other services

9.1 Household respondents’ approval of the subproject item included in subproject description

9.2 Willingness to pay for additional items to subproject features

9.3 How much is amount of user/rental fee per month?

9.4 Other means of covering up user fees (multiple responses)

9.5 Willingness to participate in consultation meetings with business owners

9.6 Experiences with tourists

9.7 Preference to have more tourists visits the area, Yes, why? (multiple responses)

9.8 Three most important things you would like to show to tourists (multiple responses)

9.9 Three most important things you would not like tourists to do in your community (multiple responses)

9.10 Preferred nature of tourism activities to gain income (multiple responses)

10 Respondents’ Concerns with Natural Disasters and Climate Change

Appendix 22

728

10.1 House/business/shops affected by typhoon and storm surge;

10.2 Yes, frequency of occurrence

10.3 Total amount per year spent for house/shops/business repairs due to typhoons, storm surge, erosions etc.

11. Training and Capacity-Building

11.1 Household member receiving training from government/institutions, if yes, Who among household member? Relationship of Household respondent with HH member who participated in training and gender

11.2 Willingness for HH members to participate in project-related training and capacity-building 11.3 Who among HH members would household respondent recommend for training and capacity-building in project; their gender 11.4 Type and nature of training and capacity-building that HH respondent recommend for HH members participating in these activities. (multiple responses)

12. Community Development and Participation

12.1 Three top priorities for improvement/development in the community (multiple responses)

12.2 Groups or community activities that household members participate in (multiple response

Appendix 22

729

1. Household Respondent Socio-Demographic Profile

Table 1b Name of province

Vientiane Champassak Total

604 151 755

Q 1c

Table 1c Name of district

Vientiane province Champassak province Total

Vang Vieng Keo Oudom Khong

554 50 151 755

Vientiane Province No. of HH respondents

Vang Vieng District

Village 2 31

Village 3 48

Village 4 34

Village 5 20

Village 6 68

Village 7 21

Village 8 24

Village 9 18

Village 10 34

Village 11 26

Village 12 20

Village 13 20

Village 14 27

Village 15 23

Village 16 34

Village 17 31

Village 18 41

Village 19 34

Keo Oudum district

Village 1 48

Village 3 1

Village 19 1

Pakse Province

Khong District

Village 20 40

Village 21 55

Village 22 36

Village 23 20

Total 755

Appendix 22

730

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Vang Vieng Keo Oudom Khong

Vientiane province Champassak province

Distribution of respondents by district

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Vientiane Champassak

Distribution of respondents by province

Appendix 22

731

Table 1h Is respondent head of household?

Frequency Proportion

Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 37 11 77.1% 22.9% 48

Vang Vieng 431 119 78.4% 21.6% 550

Khong 112 39 74.2% 25.8% 151

All 3

districts 580 169 77.4% 22.6% 749

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70V

illa

ge

2

Vil

lag

e 3

Vil

lag

e 4

Vil

lag

e 5

Vil

lag

e 6

Vil

lag

e 7

Vil

lag

e 8

Vil

lag

e 9

Vil

lag

e 1

0

Vil

lag

e 1

1

Vil

lag

e 1

2

Vil

lag

e 1

3

Vil

lag

e 1

4

Vil

lag

e 1

5

Vil

lag

e 1

6

Vil

lag

e 1

7

Vil

lag

e 1

8

Villa

ge

19

Vil

lag

e 1

Vil

lag

e 3

Vil

lag

e 1

9

Vil

lag

e 2

0

Vil

lag

e 2

1

Vil

lag

e 2

2

Vil

lag

e 2

3

Vangvieng district Keo Oudum

district

Khong district

Vientiane province Pakse province

Distribution of respondents by village

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Keo Oudom Vang Vieng Khong All 3 districts

Proportion of respondents who are head of household

Appendix 22

732

Q 1i

Table 1i Gender distribution of respondents


Female Male Female Male Total

Keo Oudom 20 30 40.0% 60.0% 50

Vang Vieng 137 411 25.0% 75.0% 548

Khong 53 98 35.1% 64.9% 151

All 3

districts 210 539 28.0% 72.0% 749

Table 1j Proportion of households to be resettled


No, not

at all

possible

Maybe,

not

confirmed

Yes,

definitely

No, not at

all

possible

Maybe, not

confirmed

Yes,

definitely Total

Keo Oudom 4 2 44 8.0% 4.0% 88.0% 50

Vang Vieng 501 53 0 90.4% 9.6% 0.0% 554

Khong 115 32 4 76.2% 21.2% 2.6% 151

All 3

districts 620 87 48 82.1% 11.5% 6.4% 755

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


Gender distribution of respondents

Female Male

Appendix 22

733

2. Household Membership Socio-Demographic and Economic Profile

Sex of HH members * Name of District Crosstabulation

Count

Name of District

Total Keo-

oudom Vangvieng Khong

Sex of HH members

Male 111 1370 367 1848

Women 113 1378 428 1919

Total 224 2748 795 3767

Marriage status * Name of District Crosstabulation

Count

Name of District

Total Keo-


Marriage status

Married 109 1366 326 1801

Separed 0 22 8 30

Divorce 5 43 23 71

Widow 4 71 43 118

Never married 50 507 146 703

Others (Child under 17) 55 675 234 964

Total 223 2684 780 3687

Education levels of HH members * Name of District Crosstabulation

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Proportion of households to be resettled

No, not at all possible Maybe, not confirmed Yes, definitely

Appendix 22

734

Count

Name of District

Total Keo-


Education levels of HH members

No school (child under 5l/Illiterate) 28 331 173 532

University complete 14 178 13 205

Others 1 30 12 43

Primary school incomplete 21 255 155 431

Primary school complete 48 489 152 689

Incompleted Secondary school 21 358 105 484

Completed Secondary school 67 782 132 981

Vocational/Technical incomplete 2 43 11 56

Vocational/ Technical Complete 12 186 17 215

University incomplete 7 29 6 42

Don't known 1 2 1 4

No answer 2 98 19 119

Total 224 2781 796 3801

Type of employment * Name of District Crosstabulation (with no missing cases)

Count

Name of District

Total Keo-


If yes, type of employment

Self employment 81 1063 383 1527

Full time works 42 375 32 449

Part time works 1 150 4 155

Other works 31 240 90 361

Total 155 1828 509 2492

Position of HH members * Name of District Crosstabulation (With no missing cases)

Count

Name of District

Total Keo-


Position of HH members

Farming 11 585 290 886

Others 16 202 32 250

Fishing 15 17 45 77

Livestock 0 44 22 66

Forest 3 19 11 33

Trade 45 346 54 445

Shop owner/house/Material for Rent

4 5 1 10

Appendix 22

735

Labor on Farming/construction 37 215 22 274

Government staff 9 278 12 299

Enteprise/Private staff 15 74 9 98

Total 155 1785 498 2438

Type of employment * Name of District Crosstabulation (with all cases)

Count

Name of District

Total Keo-


If yes, type of employment

Self employment 81 1063 383 1527

Full time works 42 375 32 449

Part time works 1 150 4 155

Other works 31 240 90 361

Chiild/student/disable/old people 63 780 258 1101

No answer 6 160 27 193

Not applicable 0 13 2 15

Total 224 2781 796 3801

Position of HH members * Name of District Crosstabulation (With all cases)

Count

Name of District

Total Keo-


Position of HH members

Farming 11 585 290 886

Others 16 202 32 250

Child/student/disable/old people 63 785 263 1111

Fishing 15 17 45 77

Livestock 0 44 22 66

Forest 3 19 11 33

Trade 45 346 54 445

Shop owner/house/Material for Rent 4 5 1 10

Labor on Farming/construction 37 215 22 274

Government staff 9 278 12 299

Enteprise/Private staff 15 74 9 98

Don't known 0 1 1 2

No answer 6 210 34 250

Total 224 2781 796 3801

Appendix 22

736

Table 3.a Proportion of HH with member(s) working away from home


Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 15 34 30.6% 69.4% 49

Khong 51 100 33.8% 66.2% 151

Vang Vieng 139 368 27.4% 72.6% 507

All 3 districts 205 502 29.0% 71.0% 707

Table 3.b Contribution of this family member to the HH income


Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 12 20 37.5% 62.5% 32

Khong 85 64 57.0% 43.0% 149

Vang Vieng 123 241 33.8% 66.2% 364

All 3 districts 220 325 40.4% 59.6% 545

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Keo Oudom Khong Vang Vieng All 3 districts

Proportion of HH with member(s) working away from home

Appendix 22

737

Table 4 Household ethnic background


Lao-

Thai Mon-Khmer Hmong Lao-Thai

Mon-

Khmer Hmong Total

Keo Oudom 47 3 0 94.0% 6.0% 0.0% 50

Khong 151 0 0 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 151

Vang Vieng 519 2 33 93.7% 0.4% 6.0% 554

All 3 districts 717 5 33 95.0% 0.7% 4.4% 755

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


Contribution of this family member to the HH income

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Household ethnic background

Lao-Thai Mon-Khmer Hmong

Appendix 22

738

Table 5 Family first language


Lao Hmong Lao Hmong Total

Keo Oudom 50 0 100.0% 0.0% 50

Khong 151 0 100.0% 0.0% 151

Vang Vieng 527 27 95.1% 4.9% 554

All 3 districts 728 27 96.4% 3.6% 755

Table 6 Proportion of HHs with disabled member

Yes No

Frequency Proportion Frequency Proportion Total

Keo Oudom 2 4.1% 47 95.9% 49

Khong 21 13.9% 130 86.1% 151

Vang Vieng 35 6.8% 480 93.2% 515

All 3 districts 58 8.1% 657 91.9% 715

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Family first language

Lao Hmong

Appendix 22

739


Table 7 How long have you been living here?


< 2

years

2-5

years

6-10

years

> 10

years

always

here

< 2

years

2-5

years

6-10

years

> 10

years

always

here Total

Keo Oudom 1 2 3 29 15 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 58.0% 30.0% 50

Khong 0 4 6 36 105 0.0% 2.6% 4.0% 23.8% 69.5% 151

Vang Vieng 1 6 34 179 334 0.2% 1.1% 6.1% 32.3% 60.3% 554

All 3 districts 2 12 43 244 454 0.3% 1.6% 5.7% 32.3% 60.1% 755

Table 8 Status of your dwelling


Rented Owned Other Rented Owned Other Total

Keo Oudom 1 49 0 2.0% 98.0% 0.0% 50

Khong 2 147 1 1.3% 98.0% 0.7% 150

Vang Vieng 6 547 0 1.1% 98.9% 0.0% 553

All 3 districts 9 743 1 1.2% 98.7% 0.1% 753

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


Proportion of HHs with disabled member


Appendix 22

740

Table 9a Proportion of household who have farmland


Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 3 39 7.1% 92.9% 42

Khong 80 71 53.0% 47.0% 151

Vang Vieng 277 249 52.7% 47.3% 526

All 3 districts 360 359 50.1% 49.9% 719

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1 2 3 4

Status of your dwelling

Rented Owned Other

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


Proportion of households who have farmland

Appendix 22

741

Table 9a1 Size of farmland (ha)


< 0.5 0.6-1 1.1-2 2.1-3 > 3 < 0.5 0.6-1 1.1-2 2.1-3 > 3 Total

Keo Oudom 0 1 1 0 0 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2

Khong 21 34 11 6 0 29.2% 47.2% 15.3% 8.3% 0.0% 72

Vang Vieng 0 82 27 4 1 0.0% 71.9% 23.7% 3.5% 0.9% 114

All 3 districts 21 117 39 10 1 11.2% 62.2% 20.7% 5.3% 0.5% 188

Table 9b Status of farmland


Rented Owned Leased Rented Owned Leased Total

Keo Oudom 8 9 0 47.1% 52.9% 0.0% 17

Khong 3 85 7 3.2% 89.5% 7.4% 95

Vang Vieng 7 323 15 2.0% 93.6% 4.3% 345

All 3 districts 18 417 22 3.9% 91.2% 4.8% 457

Table 9c Household self-subsistence


Not self-

subsistent

Self-

subsistent

More than self-

subsistent

Not self-

subsistent

Self-

subsistent

More than

self-subsistent Total

Keo Oudom 8 9 0 47.1% 52.9% 0.0% 17

Khong 3 85 7 3.2% 89.5% 7.4% 95

Vang Vieng 7 323 15 2.0% 93.6% 4.3% 345

All 3 districts 18 417 22 3.9% 91.2% 4.8% 457

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


Size of farmland (ha)

< 0.5 0.6-1 1.1-2 2.1-3 > 3

Appendix 22

742

Table 10a Proportion of HHs who have a vegetable garden


Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 5 32 13.5% 86.5% 37

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Status of your farmland

Rented Owned Leased

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Household self-subsistence

Not self-subsistent Self-subsistent More than self-subsistent

Appendix 22

743

Khong 31 120 20.5% 79.5% 151

Vang Vieng 159 236 40.3% 59.7% 395

All 3 districts 195 388 33.4% 66.6% 583

Table 10b Household self-subsistence in vegetables


Not self-

subsistent

Self-

subsistent

More than

self-

subsistent

Not self-

subsistent

Self-

subsistent

More than

self-

subsistent Total

Keo Oudom 2 4 2 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 8

Khong 0 10 21 0.0% 32.3% 67.7% 31

Vang Vieng 19 121 44 10.3% 65.8% 23.9% 184

All 3 districts 21 135 67 9.4% 60.5% 30.0% 223

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%


Proportion of households who have a vegetable garden

Table 11a Type of crops cultivated in the garden

Rice Vegetables

Fruit

(excl.

banana)

Banana Corn Rosewood Rice Vegetables

Fruit

(excl.

banana)

Banana Corn Rosewood Total

Keo Oudom 3 1 0 2 0 0 50.0% 16.7% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 6

Khong 0 6 4 4 0 3 0.0% 35.3% 23.5% 23.5% 0.0% 17.6% 17

Vang Vieng 62 22 9 13 1 0 57.9% 20.6% 8.4% 12.1% 0.9% 0.0% 107

All 3 districts 65 29 13 19 1 3 50.0% 22.3% 10.0% 14.6% 0.8% 2.3% 130


Appendix 22

744

Table 11b Use of garden production


Part or

all for

sale Only

consumption

Part or

all for

sale Only

consumption

Total

Keo Oudom 0 4 0.0% 100.0% 4

Khong 0 1 0.0% 100.0% 1

Vang Vieng 37 43 46.3% 53.8% 80

All 3 districts 37 48 43.5% 56.5% 85

Table 12 Place to market garden productions


Trader at

home

Local

market

On

roadside Other

Trader

at

home

Local

market

On

roadside Other Total

Keo Oudom 1 3 0 0 25.0% 75.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4

Khong 6 2 5 1 42.9% 14.3% 35.7% 7.1% 14

Vang Vieng 24 59 15 17 20.9% 51.3% 13.0% 14.8% 115

All 3 districts 31 64 20 18 23.3% 48.1% 15.0% 13.5% 133

Table 13 Economic situation of the HHs in the community


Relatively

well-off

Just

enough

to live

Poor Very

poor

Relatively

well-off

Just

enough

to live

Poor Very

poor

Trader

at home

Keo Oudom 1 33 14 1 2.0% 67.3% 28.6% 2.0% 49

Khong 3 110 35 2 2.0% 73.3% 23.3% 1.3% 150

Vang Vieng 19 520 12 2 3.4% 94.0% 2.2% 0.4% 553

All 3 districts 23 663 61 5 3.1% 88.2% 8.1% 0.7% 752

Table 14 Economic situation of your household compared to others in the community

Very

wealthy

Bit more

wealthyAverage

Bit less

wealthyPoor

Very

wealthy

Bit more

wealthyAverage

Bit less

wealthyPoor Total

Keo Oudom 0 1 31 16 2 0.0% 2.0% 62.0% 32.0% 4.0% 50

Khong 0 8 103 32 7 0.0% 5.3% 68.7% 21.3% 4.7% 150

Vang Vieng 4 18 490 35 5 0.7% 3.3% 88.8% 6.3% 0.9% 552

All 3 districts 4 27 624 83 14 0.5% 3.6% 83.0% 11.0% 1.9% 752


Appendix 22

745

Table 15 Sign/characteristics of wealthy households


Keo

Oudom Khong

Vang

Vieng

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom Khong

Vang

Vieng

All 3

districts

Permanent/stable/good

job 16 7 335 358 32.0% 4.6% 60.5% 47.4%

Permanent/large house 20 2 316 338 40.0% 1.3% 57.0% 44.8%

Business/trade

activities 30 97 50 177 60.0% 64.2% 9.0% 23.4%

Large/many vehicles 17 0 88 105 34.0% 0.0% 15.9% 13.9%

Large farmland 1 3 79 83 2.0% 2.0% 14.3% 11.0%

Valuable stuff/assets 1 2 65 68 2.0% 1.3% 11.7% 9.0%

Good

financial/economic

situation - Good income 9 0 51 60 18.0% 0.0% 9.2% 7.9%

Much

fund/capital/money 2 17 23 42 4.0% 11.3% 4.2% 5.6%

Good basics (have

everything) 0 0 12 12 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 1.6%

Good education/High

knowledge 0 2 2 4 0.0% 1.3% 0.4% 0.5%

Hard working 0 0 2 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.3%

Fishing activities 0 2 0 2 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 0.3%

Much livestock capital 0 1 0 1 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.1%

Have family plan 0 0 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1%

Table 16 Sign/characteristics of poor households


Keo

Oudom Khong

Vang

Vieng

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom Khong

Vang

Vieng

All 3

districts

No good/permanent

job 41 0 493 534 82.0% 0.0% 89.0% 70.7%

Temporary/small house 26 2 330 358 52.0% 1.3% 59.6% 47.4%

No fund/money 10 95 111 216 20.0% 62.9% 20.0% 28.6%

Small or no farmland 2 51 117 170 4.0% 33.8% 21.1% 22.5%

Lazy 2 0 101 103 4.0% 0.0% 18.2% 13.6%

Low or no education 0 28 12 40 0.0% 18.5% 2.2% 5.3%

Lack of labour - Old

people or many young

kids 0 12 6 18 0.0% 7.9% 1.1% 2.4%

No vehicles 4 1 10 15 8.0% 0.7% 1.8% 2.0%

No financial support/No

advice 0 10 0 10 0.0% 6.6% 0.0% 1.3%

Bad financial/economic

situation 0 0 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 1.1%

Appendix 22

746

No business activities 0 3 0 3 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.4%

Family recently settled 0 0 3 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.4%

Selfish 0 0 2 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.3%

No head of family 0 1 0 1 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.1%

Rented land 0 1 0 1 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.1%

Lifestyle 1 0 0 1 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%

4. Access to Mobility and Telecommunications

Table 17 Proportion of HHs whom have a bicycle


Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 10 40 20.0% 80.0% 50

Khong 64 87 42.4% 57.6% 151

Vang Vieng 420 134 75.8% 24.2% 554

All 3 districts 494 261 65.4% 34.6% 755

Table 18 Proportion of HHs whom have a motorcycle


Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 45 5 90.0% 10.0% 50

Khong 110 41 72.8% 27.2% 151

Vang Vieng 541 13 97.7% 2.3% 554

All 3 districts 696 59 92.2% 7.8% 755

Table 19 Proportion of HHs whom have a TV


Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 47 3 94.0% 6.0% 50

Khong 138 13 91.4% 8.6% 151

Vang Vieng 548 6 98.9% 1.1% 554

All 3 districts 733 22 97.1% 2.9% 755

Table 20 Type of house

Concrete 1

floor

Concrete

2 floors

Partly

wood and

concrete

Wood & tin

roof

Wood &

thatch roof

Concrete

1 floor

Concrete

2 floors

Partly wood

and concrete

Wood &

tin roof

Wood &

thatch

roof

Total

Keo Oudom 5 2 5 38 0 10.0% 4.0% 10.0% 76.0% 0.0% 50

Khong 11 6 11 118 5 7.3% 4.0% 7.3% 78.1% 3.3% 151

Vang Vieng 364 55 121 14 0 65.7% 9.9% 21.8% 2.5% 0.0% 554

All 3 districts 380 63 137 170 5 50.3% 8.3% 18.1% 22.5% 0.7% 755

ProportionFrequency

Appendix 22

747

Table 21 Proportion of HHs whom have electricity


Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 49 1 98.0% 2.0% 50

Khong 144 7 95.4% 4.6% 151

Vang Vieng 553 1 99.8% 0.2% 554

All 3 districts 746 9 98.8% 1.2% 755

Table 21a Number of hours of electricity per day


12 hours 24 hours 12 hours 24 hours Total

Keo Oudom 0 50 0.0% 100.0% 50

Khong 5 139 3.5% 96.5% 144

Vang Vieng 4 545 0.7% 99.3% 549

All 3 districts 9 734 1.2% 98.8% 743

Table 22 Main source of communications from the national government received in the household


TV Radio

News-

paper Other Remarks TV Radio

News-

paper Other

Keo

Oudom 50 1 0 1

Neighbour-

hood 100.0% 2.0% 0.0% 2.0%

Khong 128 12 4 0 / 84.8% 7.9% 2.6% 0.0%

Vang

Vieng 548 31 14 2

Internet

& Mobile 98.9% 5.6% 2.5% 0.4%

All 3

districts 726 44 18 3 0 96.2% 5.8% 2.4% 0.4%

Table 23 Main source of communications from the local government received in the household


TV Radio

Print

memo/

flyer

from

village

Village

meeting Other TV Radio

Print memo/

flyer from

village

Village

meeting Other

Keo

Oudom 8 0 0 50 0 16.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Khong 49 7 1 144 0 32.5% 4.6% 0.7% 95.4% 0.0%

Vang Vieng 177 13 9 554 0 31.9% 2.3% 1.6% 100.0% 0.0%

All 3

districts 234 20 10 748 0 31.0% 2.6% 1.3% 99.1% 0.0%

Appendix 22

748

5. Access to Health

Table 24 Number and proportion of household affected by illnesses


Adults

(male)

Adults

(female)

Children

(<5 yrs)

Adults

(male)

Adults

(female)

Children

(<5 yrs)

Mild

diarrhea

Keo Oudom 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Vang Vieng 13 3 6 2.3% 0.5% 1.1%

Khong 8 12 4 5.3% 7.9% 2.6%

All 3 districts 21 15 10 2.8% 2.0% 1.3%

Severe

diarrhea

Keo Oudom 0 0 1 0.0% 0.0% 2.0%

Vang Vieng 5 3 1 0.9% 0.5% 0.2%

Khong 4 1 1 2.6% 0.7% 0.7%

All 3 districts 9 4 3 1.2% 0.5% 0.4%

Eye

diseases

Keo Oudom 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Vang Vieng 13 3 6 2.3% 0.5% 1.1%

Khong 8 12 4 5.3% 7.9% 2.6%

All 3 districts 21 15 10 2.8% 2.0% 1.3%

Skin

diseases

Keo Oudom 0 0 1 0.0% 0.0% 2.0%

Vang Vieng 5 4 1 0.9% 0.7% 0.2%

Khong 9 6 8 6.0% 4.0% 5.3%

All 3 districts 14 10 10 1.9% 1.3% 1.3%

Colds

Cough

Respiratory

ailments

Keo Oudom 8 2 4 16.0% 4.0% 8.0%

Vang Vieng 52 45 48 9.4% 8.1% 8.7%

Khong 56 65 51 37.1% 43.0% 33.8%

All 3 districts 116 112 103 15.4% 14.8% 13.6%

Headache

Muscular

pain

Back pain

Keo Oudom 14 10 1 28.0% 20.0% 2.0%

Vang Vieng 52 52 10 9.4% 9.4% 1.8%

Khong 66 78 31 43.7% 51.7% 20.5%

All 3 districts 132 140 42 17.5% 18.5% 5.6%

Other

illnesses

Keo Oudom 1 2 0 2.0% 4.0% 0.0%

Vang Vieng 40 30 11 7.2% 5.4% 2.0%

Khong 31 40 25 20.5% 26.5% 16.6%

All 3 districts 72 72 36 9.5% 9.5% 4.8%

Table 25 Source of medical advice or/and treatment


Friends

relatives

neighbours

Keo Oudom 2 4.0%

Vang Vieng 12 2.2%

Khong 63 41.7%

All 3 districts 77 10.2%

Keo Oudom 10 20.0%

Appendix 22

749

Traditional

doctor

healer

practitioner

Vang Vieng 45 8.1%

Khong 55 36.4%


Pharmacy or

shop

Keo Oudom 25 50.0%

Vang Vieng 72 13.0%

Khong 72 47.7%


Government

health center

or clinic

Keo Oudom 6 12.0%

Vang Vieng 113 20.4%

Khong 103 68.2%


Government

hospital

Keo Oudom 26 52.0%

Vang Vieng 345 62.3%

Khong 82 54.3%


Private

doctor

Keo Oudom 6 12.0%

Vang Vieng 12 2.2%

Khong 42 27.8%


Other

Keo Oudom 1 2.0%

Vang Vieng 0 0.0%

Khong 4 2.6%


Table 26a Type of water supply system

Frequency

Rain

water

Traditional/

shallow well

Deep

well

Public

tap Pur-chased

Canal,

river,

pond

Piped

water Other

Keo Oudom 0 3 2 0 4 29 2 9

Vang Vieng 1 167 13 45 12 3 293 4

Khong 0 8 13 2 3 123 2 0

All 3

districts 1 178 28 47 19 155 297 13

Proportion Total

Rain

water

Traditional/

shallow

well

Deep

well

Public

tap

Pur-

chased

Canal,

river,

pond

Piped water Other

Keo Oudom 0.0% 6.1% 4.1% 0.0% 8.2% 59.2% 4.1% 18.4% 49

Vang Vieng 0.2% 31.0% 2.4% 8.4% 2.2% 0.6% 54.5% 0.7% 538

Khong 0.0% 5.3% 8.6% 1.3% 2.0% 81.5% 1.3% 0.0% 151

All 3 districts 0.1% 24.1% 3.8% 6.4% 2.6% 21.0% 40.2% 1.8% 738

Appendix 22

750

Table 26b Number of times per day for water collection

Once a day 2 times 3 times Always Everyone Total

Keo Oudom 1 0 1 2 0 4

Vang Vieng 0 0 0 0 2 2

Khong 0 1 0 0 0 1

All 3 districts 1 1 1 2 2 7

Table 26c Distance to water source

< 10

m.

10-

20

m.

20-30

m.

30-50

m.

50-

100

m.

100-

200 m.

200-

300 m.

300-

500 m.

> 500

m. Total

Keo Oudom 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 4

Vang Vieng 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Khong 2 7 6 2 5 3 3 1 2 31

All 3 districts 2 7 9 2 6 3 3 1 2 35

Table 26d1 Age of the household member who collects water

< 20 yrs. 20-30 yrs. 30-40 yrs. 40-50 yrs. 50-60 yrs. > 60 yrs. Total

Keo Oudom 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Vang Vieng 1 1 1 0 0 0 3

Khong 2 4 2 5 4 3 20

All 3 districts 3 5 3 5 5 3 24

Table 26d2 Gender of the household member who collects water

1 2 3 Total

Keo Oudom 0 1 0 1

Vang Vieng 2 0 0 2

Khong 12 7 7 26

All 3 districts 14 8 7 29

Table 26e Time to collect water

0-5 min. 6-10 min. 11-20 min. 21-30 min. > 30 min. Total

Keo Oudom 3 7 3 4 1 18

Vang Vieng 3 5 1 1 0 10

Khong 22 0 0 0 1 23

All 3 districts 28 12 4 5 2 51

Appendix 22

751

Table 27 Type of toilet

Frequency Proportion Total

Pit

latrine

Toilet in

house Others None

Pit

latrine

Toilet in

house Others None

Keo Oudom 33 17 0 0 66.0% 34.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50

Vang Vieng 176 365 0 1 32.5% 67.3% 0.0% 0.2% 542

Khong 78 41 0 32 51.7% 27.2% 0.0% 21.2% 151

All 3 districts 287 423 0 33 38.6% 56.9% 0.0% 4.4% 743

6. Access to Education

Table 28a Existing primary school in the village


Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 50 0 100.0% 0.0% 50

Vang Vieng 491 41 92.3% 7.7% 532

Khong 150 1 99.3% 0.7% 151

All 3 districts 691 42 94.3% 5.7% 733

Table 28b Distance to primary school


< 1 km 1 to 1.5 km > 2 km < 1 km 1 to 1.5 km > 2 km

Keo Oudom 0 1 40 0.0% 2.4% 97.6% 41

Vang Vieng 195 69 0 73.9% 26.1% 0.0% 264

Khong 135 0 8 94.4% 0.0% 5.6% 143

All 3 districts 330 70 48 73.7% 15.6% 10.7% 448

Table 29a Existing secondary school in the village


Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 47 2 95.9% 4.1% 49

Vang Vieng 156 341 31.4% 68.6% 497

Khong 88 63 58.3% 41.7% 151

All 3 districts 291 406 41.8% 58.2% 697

Table 29b Distance to secondary school



Keo Oudom 0 0 41 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 41

Vang Vieng 44 53 8 41.9% 50.5% 7.6% 105

Appendix 22

752

Khong 0 56 26 0.0% 68.3% 31.7% 82

All 3 districts 44 109 75 19.3% 47.8% 32.9% 228

Table 30a Existing high school


Yes No Yes No Total

Keo Oudom 1 47 2.1% 97.9% 48

Vang Vieng 173 328 34.5% 65.5% 501

Khong 81 70 53.6% 46.4% 151

All 3 districts 255 445 36.4% 63.6% 700

Table 30b Distance to high school



Keo Oudom 0 0 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 5

Vang Vieng 80 22 10 71.4% 19.6% 8.9% 112

Khong 0 53 24 0.0% 68.8% 31.2% 77

All 3 districts 80 75 39 41.2% 38.7% 20.1% 194

7. Household Income and Expenditures

Table 31a Main source of livelihood/income

Frequency

Farming Fishing Livestock

Forest

activities

Business/

trade

Renting

equipment

Selling/

renting

land

Wages/

Salary

Keo Oudom 1 7 1 0 8 3 0 1

Vang Vieng 51 12 34 0 99 22 5 42

Khong 52 22 13 8 6 11 8 0

All 3 districts 104 41 48 8 113 36 13 43

Proportion


Forest

activities

Business/

trade

Renting

equipment

Selling/

renting

land

Wages/

Salary Total

Keo Oudom 4.8% 33.3% 4.8% 0.0% 38.1% 14.3% 0.0% 4.8% 21

Vang Vieng 19.2% 4.5% 12.8% 0.0% 37.4% 8.3% 1.9% 15.8% 265

Khong 43.3% 18.3% 10.8% 6.7% 5.0% 9.2% 6.7% 0.0% 120

All 3 districts 25.6% 10.1% 11.8% 2.0% 27.8% 8.9% 3.2% 10.6% 406

Appendix 22

753

Table 31b Other sources of livelihood/income

Frequency


Forest

activities

Business/

trade

Renting

equipment

Selling/

renting

land

Wages/

Salary

Keo Oudom 0 5 4 2 4 5 2 0

Vang Vieng 80 10 78 13 45 11 7 8

Khong

All 3 districts 80 15 82 15 49 16 9 8

Proportion


Forest

activities

Business/

trade

Renting

equipment

Selling/

renting

land

Wages/

Salary Total

Keo Oudom 0.0% 22.7% 18.2% 9.1% 18.2% 22.7% 9.1% 0.0% 22

Vang Vieng 31.7% 4.0% 31.0% 5.2% 17.9% 4.4% 2.8% 3.2% 252

Khong 0

All 3 districts 29.2% 5.5% 29.9% 5.5% 17.9% 5.8% 3.3% 2.9% 274

Appendix 22

Table 32 Amount of income per year from sources not directly related to tourism

Farming Fishing Livestock Forest activitiesBusiness/tradeRenting equipmenSelling/renting landCasual work Wages/salary Remittances Other Total

Keo Oudom 2 14 3 1 4 0 0 2 2 1 3 27

Vang Vieng 129 16 83 21 42 5 8 72 100 7 122 406

Khong 56 39 42 6 9 0 1 6 5 0 12 123

All 3 districts 187 69 128 28 55 5 9 80 107 8 137 556

Keo Oudom 4.0% 28.0% 6.0% 2.0% 8.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% 4.0% 2.0% 6.0% 54.0%

Vang Vieng 23.3% 2.9% 15.0% 3.8% 7.6% 0.9% 1.4% 13.0% 18.1% 1.3% 22.0% 73.3%

Khong 37.1% 25.8% 27.8% 4.0% 6.0% 0.0% 0.7% 4.0% 3.3% 0.0% 7.9% 81.5%

All 3 districts 24.8% 9.1% 17.0% 3.7% 7.3% 0.7% 1.2% 10.6% 14.2% 1.1% 18.1% 73.6%

Keo Oudom 3,600,000 5,125,714 13,800,000 4,800,000 36,000,000 7,800,000 30,000,000 1,000,000 1,001,700,000 124,105,926

Vang Vieng 20,274,651 12,906,250 31,093,133 8,647,619 34,642,857 19,920,000 23,450,000 24,956,944 35,871,880 8,642,857 43,634,426 44,567,606

Khong 4,680,000 3,952,564 3,113,333 1,070,000 154,600,000 700,000 6,510,000 28,908,000 10,958,750 18,378,984

All 3 districts 15,426,257 6,266,812 21,506,953 6,886,429 54,370,909 19,920,000 20,922,222 23,144,500 35,436,710 7,687,500 61,751,861 42,636,552

Keo Oudom 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 4,800,000 30,000,000 7,800,000 30,000,000 1,000,000 4,800,000 6,000,000

Vang Vieng 8,000,000 12,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 24,000,000 24,000,000 13,200,000 24,000,000 30,000,000 5,000,000 24,000,000 28,425,000

Khong 3,600,000 3,600,000 2,400,000 1,080,000 200,000,000 700,000 4,500,000 28,140,000 6,000,000 6,000,000

All 3 districts 3,600,000 4,200,000 3,600,000 4,400,000 24,000,000 24,000,000 12,000,000 24,000,000 30,000,000 5,000,000 24,000,000 22,200,000

Keo Oudom 1,200,000 360,000 1,800,000 4,800,000 24,000,000 6,000,000 12,000,000 1,000,000 300,000 300,000

Vang Vieng 120,000 1,000,000 600,000 600,000 1,200,000 6,000,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 240,000 1,900,000 1,500,000 120,000

Khong 500,000 200,000 200,000 300,000 200,000 700,000 460,000 12,000,000 15,000 240,000

All 3 districts 120,000 200,000 200,000 300,000 200,000 6,000,000 700,000 460,000 240,000 1,000,000 15,000 120,000

Keo Oudom 6,000,000 12,000,000 36,000,000 4,800,000 60,000,000 9,600,000 48,000,000 1,000,000 3,000,000,000 3,000,000,000

Vang Vieng 480,000,000 30,000,000 1,800,000,000 36,000,000 180,000,000 33,600,000 115,000,000 72,000,000 120,000,000 20,600,000 360,000,000 1,800,000,000

Khong 15,600,000 15,000,000 36,000,000 2,400,000 500,000,000 700,000 18,000,000 60,000,000 36,000,000 500,000,000

All 3 districts 480,000,000 30,000,000 1,800,000,000 36,000,000 500,000,000 33,600,000 115,000,000 72,000,000 120,000,000 20,600,000 3,000,000,000 3,000,000,000

Sector of income

Number of

households

% of households

Average income

(LAK)

Median income

(LAK)

Minimum income

(LAK)

Maximum income

(LAK)

Appendix 22

755

Table 32 Household average yearly expenditure

Provide data Don't provide data Total

Number of

households

Keo Oudom 9 41 50

Vang Vieng 302 252 554

Khong 64 87 151

All 3 districts 375 380 755

% of

households

Keo Oudom 18.0% 82.0% 100.0%

Vang Vieng 54.5% 45.5% 100.0%

Khong 42.4% 57.6% 100.0%

All 3 districts 49.7% 50.3% 100.0%

Average yearly

expenditure

(LAK)

Keo Oudom 76,600,000

Vang Vieng 37,384,252

Khong 21,178,125

All 3 districts 35,559,584

Median yearly

expenditure

(LAK)

Keo Oudom

Vang Vieng

Khong

All 3 districts

Minimum

yearly

expenditure

(LAK)

Keo Oudom 2,400,000

Vang Vieng 720,000

Khong 36,000

All 3 districts 36,000

Maximum

yearly

expenditure

(LAK)

Keo Oudom 240,000,000

Vang Vieng 600,000,000

Khong 180,000,000

All 3 districts 600,000,000

Table 34 Proportion of households who get income from activities directly related to tourism


Yes No Don't know Yes No Don't know

Keo Oudom 20 17 13 40.0% 34.0% 26.0% 50

Vang Vieng 102 271 181 18.4% 48.9% 32.7% 554

Khong 34 93 24 22.5% 61.6% 15.9% 151

All 3 districts 156 381 218 20.7% 50.5% 28.9% 755

Appendix 22

756

Table 35 Amount of income per year from sources directly related to tourism

Renting

out/selling

accomodation

Cooking and

selling cooked

food

Selling food and

beverages

Selling

handicrafts

Selling locally-

produced alcohol

Tour guiding/

trekking services

Cultural

performancesOther Total

Keo Oudom 1 4 7 2 3 6 20

Vang Vieng 21 12 19 11 1 6 5 28 97

Khong 17 13 15 1 1 9 3 3 36

All 3 districts 39 29 41 14 2 18 8 37 153

Keo Oudom 2.0% 8.0% 14.0% 4.0% 0.0% 6.0% 0.0% 12.0% 40.0%

Vang Vieng 3.8% 2.2% 3.4% 2.0% 0.2% 1.1% 0.9% 5.1% 17.5%

Khong 11.3% 8.6% 9.9% 0.7% 0.7% 6.0% 2.0% 2.0% 23.8%

All 3 districts 5.2% 3.8% 5.4% 1.9% 0.3% 2.4% 1.1% 4.9% 20.3%

Keo Oudom 72,000,000 822,000,000 64,800,000 30,000,000 112,000,000 19,800,000 220,070,000

Vang Vieng 77,752,381 68,000,000 87,473,684 12,036,364 12,000,000 39,000,000 8,160,000 59,442,857 64,202,887

Khong 55,882,353 19,753,846 17,386,667 6,000,000 108,000 2,144,267 1,193,333 70,366,667 51,516,683

All 3 districts 68,071,795 150,372,414 57,960,976 14,171,429 6,054,000 32,738,800 5,547,500 53,900,000 81,592,684

Keo Oudom 72,000,000 126,000,000 24,000,000 30,000,000 96,000,000 15,000,000 30,000,000

Vang Vieng 36,000,000 42,000,000 96,000,000 6,000,000 12,000,000 36,000,000 6,000,000 21,000,000 24,000,000

Khong 10,000,000 7,200,000 12,000,000 6,000,000 108,000 1,200,000 1,680,000 9,600,000 13,600,000

All 3 districts 24,000,000 24,000,000 35,000,000 6,000,000 6,054,000 12,000,000 4,200,000 18,000,000 24,000,000

Keo Oudom 72,000,000 36,000,000 3,600,000 24,000,000 60,000,000 4,800,000 3,600,000

Vang Vieng 1,200,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 1,200,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 3,600,000 2,400,000 180,000

Khong 1,200,000 3,000,000 1,200,000 6,000,000 108,000 5,000 220,000 1,500,000 5,417

All 3 districts 1,200,000 3,000,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 108,000 5,000 220,000 1,500,000 5,417

Keo Oudom 72,000,000 3,000,000,000 270,000,000 36,000,000 180,000,000 36,000,000 3,000,000,000

Vang Vieng 405,000,000 180,000,000 360,000,000 60,000,000 12,000,000 96,000,000 14,400,000 720,000,000 1,269,000,000

Khong 450,000,000 60,000,000 60,000,000 6,000,000 108,000 12,000,000 1,680,000 200,000,000 524,000,000

All 3 districts 450,000,000 3,000,000,000 360,000,000 60,000,000 12,000,000 180,000,000 14,400,000 720,000,000 3,000,000,000

Sector of income

Number of

households

% of households

Average income

(LAK)

Median income

(LAK)

Minimum

income (LAK)

Maximum

income (LAK)

Appendix 22

757

8. Consultation on Subproject and Tourism Development

Table 36a Awareness of villagers of the plan for the sub-project


Yes No Don't know Yes No Don't know Total

Keo Oudom 47 1 0 97.9% 2.1% 0.0% 48

Vang Vieng 316 153 7 66.4% 32.1% 1.5% 476

Khong 115 34 1 76.7% 22.7% 0.7% 150

All 3 districts 478 188 8 70.9% 27.9% 1.2% 674

Table 36b How did you learn about the sub-project?

Frequency

Village

meeting

Village

chief

Villager/

friend

District

meeting

Dept of

tourism

Government

officer

Project

staff

Tourism

organization Tourist

Don't

know

Keo Oudom 32 4 1 0 3 0 0 5 0 0

Vang Vieng 213 3 0 30 12 21 6 0 0 1

Khong 0 83 5 0 0 0 0 0 27 36

All 3 districts 245 90 6 30 15 21 6 5 27 37

Proportion

Village

meeting

Village

chief

Villager/

friend

District

meeting

Dept of

tourism

Government

officer

Tourism

organization Tourist

Don't

know Total

Keo Oudom 71.1% 8.9% 2.2% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 45

Vang Vieng 74.5% 1.0% 0.0% 10.5% 4.2% 7.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 286

Khong 0.0% 55.0% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.9% 23.8% 151

All 3 districts 50.8% 18.7% 1.2% 6.2% 3.1% 4.4% 1.0% 5.6% 7.7% 482

Table 37 What do you know about the SP plan ?

Frequency

Infrastructure

development

Tourism

place

development

Sanitation/

waste

Economic

development

Community

development

Development

of business

on tourism

Irrigation

systems

development

Livestock

developm

ent

Appendix 22

758

treatment

project

Keo Oudom 24 26 1 0 0 0 0 0

Vang Vieng 295 37 33 10 7 2 2 2

Khong 112 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

All 3 districts 431 63 34 10 8 2 2 2

Proportion

Infrastructure

development

Tourism

place

development

Sanitation/

waste

treatment

project

Economic

development

Community

development

Development

of business

on tourism

Irrigation

systems

development

Livestock

developm

ent

Total

Keo Oudom 47.1% 51.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 51

Vang Vieng 76.0% 9.5% 8.5% 2.6% 1.8% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 388

Khong 99.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 113

All 3 districts 78.1% 11.4% 6.2% 1.8% 1.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 552

Table 38 Do you think this SP is benefitial for the community?



Keo Oudom 42 0 0 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 42

Vang Vieng 426 7 3 97.7% 1.6% 0.7% 436

Khong 161 1 32 83.0% 0.5% 16.5% 194

All 3 districts 629 8 35 93.6% 1.2% 5.2% 672

Table 38.1 Why do you think this SP is benefitial for the community?

Infrastructure

development

Community

development

Life more

comfortable/

convenient

Community

more clean

Economic

development

Tourism and

business

development

Infrastructure

development

Community

development

Life more

comfortable/

convenient

Community

more clean

Economic

development

Tourism and

business

development

Total

Keo Oudom 7 3 17 6 0 9 16.7% 7.1% 40.5% 14.3% 0.0% 21.4% 42

Vang Vieng 168 99 85 30 31 16 39.2% 23.1% 19.8% 7.0% 7.2% 3.7% 429

Khong 145 8 0 0 4 8 87.9% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4% 4.8% 165

All 3 districts 320 110 102 36 35 33 50.3% 17.3% 16.0% 5.7% 5.5% 5.2% 636


Appendix 22

759

Table 38.2 Why do you think this SP is not benefitial for the community?


Too close

to village

More

pollution

More

poverty

No

impact

Too close

to village

More

pollution

More

poverty

No

impact Total

Keo Oudom 0 0 0 0 0

Vang Vieng 5 1 1 0 71.4% 14.3% 14.3% 0.0% 7

Khong 0 0 0 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 1

All 3 districts 5 1 1 1 62.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 8

Table 39.1 What people or groups of people will benefit from the SP?

Frequency

Community/

Villagers

Businessmen/

Traders Tourists Students Government Contractors

Project

owner

Keo Oudom 27 21 16 0 0 0 0

Vang Vieng 420 32 26 12 0 2 1

Khong 162 79 76 0 11 0 0

All 3 districts 609 132 118 12 11 2 1

Proportion

Community/

Villagers

Businessmen/

Traders Tourists Students Government Contractors

Project

owner Total

Keo Oudom 42.2% 32.8% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 64

Vang Vieng 85.2% 6.5% 5.3% 2.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.2% 493

Khong 49.4% 24.1% 23.2% 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 328

All 3 districts 68.8% 14.9% 13.3% 1.4% 1.2% 0.2% 0.1% 885

Table 39.2 How people or groups of people will benefit from the SP?

Frequency

Infrastructure

development

Community

development

Life more

comfortable/

convenient

Community

more clean

Economic

development

Tourism and

business

development

Building

facility/ New

housing area

Appendix 22

760

Keo Oudom 7 9 6 3 20 3 1

Vang Vieng 241 50 93 30 55 17 0

Khong 54 1 0 0 82 71 75

All 3 districts 302 60 99 33 157 91 76

Proportion

Infrastructure

development

Community

development

Life more

comfortable/

convenient

Community

more clean

Economic

development

Tourism and

business

development

Building

facility/ New

housing area

Total

Keo Oudom 14.3% 18.4% 12.2% 6.1% 40.8% 6.1% 2.0% 49

Vang Vieng 49.6% 10.3% 19.1% 6.2% 11.3% 3.5% 0.0% 486

Khong 19.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 29.0% 25.1% 26.5% 283

All 3 districts 36.9% 7.3% 12.1% 4.0% 19.2% 11.1% 9.3% 818

Table 40 Do you think this SP will benefit you ?



Keo Oudom 42 0 1 97.7% 0.0% 2.3% 43

Vang Vieng 411 6 3 97.9% 1.4% 0.7% 420

Khong 145 0 2 98.6% 0.0% 1.4% 147

All 3 districts 598 6 6 98.0% 1.0% 1.0% 610

Table 40.1 Why this SP will benefit you ?

Frequency

Infrastructure

and village

facilities

Better

life/

livelihood

Life more

comfortable/

convenient

Community

more clean

Economic

development/

more income

Tourism and

trade

development

New

housing

area

Financial

compensation

Keo Oudom 7 2 1 1 10 7 11 6

Vang Vieng 150 45 51 27 101 36 0 0

Khong 121 2 0 0 21 4 1 0

All 3 districts 278 49 52 28 132 47 12 6

Appendix 22

761

Proportion

Infrastructure

and village

facilities

Better

life/

livelihood

Life more

comfortable/

convenient

Community

more clean

Economic

development/

more income

Tourism and

trade

development

New

housing

area

Financial

compensation Total

Keo Oudom 15.6% 4.4% 2.2% 2.2% 22.2% 15.6% 24.4% 13.3% 45

Vang Vieng 36.6% 11.0% 12.4% 6.6% 24.6% 8.8% 0.0% 0.0% 410

Khong 81.2% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 14.1% 2.7% 0.7% 0.0% 149

All 3 districts 46.0% 8.1% 8.6% 4.6% 21.9% 7.8% 2.0% 1.0% 604

Table 40.2 Why this SP will not benefit you ?


Damages

for

residents

Negative

impact on

culture

Pollution Too close

to village

Increases

poverty

Damages

for

residents

Negative

impact on

culture

Pollution Too close

to village

Increases

poverty Total

Keo Oudom 0

Vang Vieng 1 1 1 2 1 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 6

Khong 0

All 3

districts 1 1 1 2 1 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 16.7% 6

Table 41 Do you have concerns about how this project will affect your household during construction ?



Keo Oudom 44 3 0 93.6% 6.4% 0.0% 47

Vang Vieng 208 169 1 55.0% 44.7% 0.3% 378

Khong 29 123 2 18.8% 79.9% 1.3% 154

All 3 districts 281 295 3 48.5% 50.9% 0.5% 579

Appendix 22

762

Table 41.2 Why don't you have concerns about how this project will affect your household during construction ?

Frequency

No negative

impact on

livelihood

Good/Planned/

Responsible

project

Project/Road

far from

house

Community

development

with project

Short

project

Will

have

better

road

Life more

comfortable

Financial

compensat

ion

Good

cooperatio

n from

villagers

Keo Oudom 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0

Vang Vieng 83 37 34 6 3 2 0 0 1

Khong 108 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

All 3 districts 192 49 34 8 3 2 1 1 1

Proportion

No

negative

impact on

livelihood

Good/Planned

/ Responsible

project

Project/Road

far from

house

Community

development

with project

Short

project

Will

have

better

road

Life more

comfortabl

e

Financial

compens

ation

Good

cooperati

on from

villagers

Total

Keo Oudom 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 4

Vang Vieng 50.0% 22.3% 20.5% 3.6% 1.8% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 166

Khong 89.3% 9.1% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 121

All 3 districts 66.0% 16.8% 11.7% 2.7% 1.0% 0.7% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 291

Table 41.1 What concerns do you have about how this project will affect your household during construction ?

Road obstruction/

Traffic problems

Negative impact

on livelihood/

houses/ land

Project cancelled

or not completed

or not responsible

Road/Project to

close to

residents

Delay in moving

to new housing

area

No financial

compensationNoise

Pollution/

Environment

impact

Dirt/Dust

No/Too small/

Inappropriate

new housing

Safety/Road

accidents

Impact on

trading activities

Income

decreaseWaste problems

No participation

from villagers

Keo Oudom 0 3 0 1 7 18 1 2 0 14 2 6 3 1 0

Vang Vieng 69 28 26 23 16 1 19 17 10 0 8 0 2 2 2

Khong 0 26 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0

All 3 districts 69 57 27 24 23 20 21 19 14 14 13 6 5 3 2

Frequency

Road obstruction/

Traffic problems

Negative impact on

livelihood/ houses/

land

Project cancelled or

not completed or not

responsible

Road/Project to close

to residents

Delay in moving to

new housing area

No financial

compensationNoise

Pollution/

Environment

impact

Dirt/Dust

No/Too small/

Inappropriate new

housing area

Safety/Road

accidents

Impact on

trading

activities

Income

decrease

Waste

problems

No participation

from villagersTotal

Keo Oudom 0.0% 5.2% 0.0% 1.7% 12.1% 31.0% 1.7% 3.4% 0.0% 24.1% 3.4% 10.3% 5.2% 1.7% 0.0% 58

Vang Vieng 30.9% 12.6% 11.7% 10.3% 7.2% 0.4% 8.5% 7.6% 4.5% 0.0% 3.6% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 223

Khong 0.0% 72.2% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 2.8% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 36

All 3 districts 21.8% 18.0% 8.5% 7.6% 7.3% 6.3% 6.6% 6.0% 4.4% 4.4% 4.1% 1.9% 1.6% 0.9% 0.6% 317

Proportion

Appendix 22

763

Table 43a Recommendations for how to change this sub-project to make it more beneficial/avoid your concerns

Frequency

Implem

ent

fast/

quality

standar

d

project

Favour

local

partici

pation

and

consul

tation

Build

high

quali

ty

and

wide

road

Favour

comm

unity

develo

pment

Organi

ze/

build

housin

g area

first

Provid

e clean

water

supply

system

s

Make

good

plan,

analysis

and

study

Good

M&E

plan

Consider

appropriate

compensation

Provide

road

safety

signs

Build a

garbage

place

Organize

/ build

new

trading/

market

area

Keo Oudom 2 2 0 0 19 0 0 0 3 0 0 5

Vang Vieng 101 28 29 24 0 19 11 0 4 6 6 0

Khong 25 0 6 1 0 0 4 9 1 0 0 0

All 3 districts 128 30 35 25 19 19 15 9 8 6 6 5

Proportion

Impleme

nt fast/

quality

standard

project

Favour

local

partici

pation

and

consul

tation

Build

high

quali

ty

and

wide

road

Favour

comm

unity

develo

pment

Orga

nize/

build

housi

ng

area

first

Provid

e clean

water

supply

system

s

Make

good

plan,

analysi

s and

study

Good

M&E plan

Consider

appropriat

e

compensati

on

Provide

road

safety

signs

Build a

garbage

place

Organize/

build new

trading/

market

area

Keo Oudom 6.3% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0%

59.4

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.4% 0.0% 0.0% 15.6%

Vang Vieng 40.9% 11.3%

11.7

% 9.7% 0.0% 7.7% 4.5% 0.0% 1.6% 2.4% 2.4% 0.0%

Khong 52.1% 0.0%

12.5

% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3% 18.8% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

All 3 districts 39.1% 9.2%

10.7

% 7.6% 5.8% 5.8% 4.6% 2.8% 2.4% 1.8% 1.8% 1.5%

Appendix 22

764

Table 43b Recommendations for how to change this sub-project to make it more beneficial/avoid your concerns (cont.)

Frequency

Provide

street

lights

Build

footpath

Rebuild

primary

school

Build

public

toilets

Avoid

pollution/

waste

Build

a

canal

Avoid to

set-up an

over-

crowded

touristic

place

Build

drains

along the

road

Define

rules

for

contra

ctors

Build

an

access

road

to the

port

Improve

/provide

electrici

ty

facilities

Provid

e

megap

hone

Keo Oudom 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Vang Vieng 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1

Khong 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

All 3 districts 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Proportion

Provide

street

lights

Build

footpath

Rebuild

primary

school

Build

public

toilets

Avoid

pollution/

waste

Build a

canal

Avoid to

set-up

an over

crowde

d

touristic

place

Build

drains

along

the road

Define

rules for

contract

ors

Build

an

access

road

to the

port

Improve

/provide

electrici

ty

facilities

Provid

e

megap

hone

Total

Keo Oudom 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 32

Vang Vieng 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 0.8% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 247

Khong 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 48

All 3 districts 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 327

9. Willingness-to-pay for sanitation and other services

Table 44 Would you be in favour of such a project ?



Keo Oudom 16 1 3 80.0% 5.0% 15.0% 20

Vang Vieng 9 0 2 81.8% 0.0% 18.2% 11

Appendix 22

765

Khong 103 5 42 68.7% 3.3% 28.0% 150

All 3 districts 128 6 47 70.7% 3.3% 26.0% 181

Table 45 (If yes) Would you be willing to pay additional fees for these improvements?



Keo Oudom 11 1 3 73.3% 6.7% 20.0% 15

Vang Vieng 9 0 2 81.8% 0.0% 18.2% 11

Khong 86 13 51 57.3% 8.7% 34.0% 150

All 3 districts 106 14 56 60.2% 8.0% 31.8% 176

Table 46 How much would you be willing to pay each month for these improvements?


0-

5,000

6-

10,000

11-

20,000

21-

30,000

31,000-

50,000

51-

100,000

>

100,000

0-

5,000

6-

10,000

11-

20,000

21-

30,000

31,000-

50,000

51-

100,000

>

100,000 Total

Keo

Oudom 1 3 3 0 3 1 2 7.7% 23.1% 23.1% 0.0% 23.1% 7.7% 15.4% 13

Vang

Vieng 6 1 1 0 1 0 0 66.7% 11.1% 11.1% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 9

Khong 38 14 16 4 5 4 1 46.3% 17.1% 19.5% 4.9% 6.1% 4.9% 1.2% 82

All 3

districts 45 18 20 4 9 5 3 43.3% 17.3% 19.2% 3.8% 8.7% 4.8% 2.9% 104

Table 47 How else should the costs be covered ?


Increase site

entry fees

Increase kiosk

rental fees

Village / district

government

budget

Increase site

entry fees

Increase kiosk

rental fees

Village /

district

government

budget

Total

Keo Oudom 3 7 10 15.0% 35.0% 50.0% 20

Appendix 22

766

Vang Vieng 51 8 180 21.3% 3.3% 75.3% 239

Khong 16 13 101 12.3% 10.0% 77.7% 130

All 3 districts 70 28 291 18.0% 7.2% 74.8% 389

Table 48

Would you be willing to participate in government consultations with business owners to learn more about these possible

improvements and to make suggestions ?



Keo Oudom 37 5 3 82.2% 11.1% 6.7% 45

Vang Vieng 363 23 74 78.9% 5.0% 16.1% 460

Khong 104 7 38 69.8% 4.7% 25.5% 149

All 3 districts 504 35 115 77.1% 5.4% 17.6% 654

10 Respondents’ Concerns

Table 49

How would you generally describe your experience with

tourists ?


Positive

Neither

positive nor

negative

Negative Don't know Positive

Neither

positive

nor

negative

Negative Don't

know Total

Keo Oudom 43 3 2 1 87.8% 6.1% 4.1% 2.0% 49

Vang Vieng 399 76 2 13 81.4% 15.5% 0.4% 2.7% 490

Khong 106 32 0 10 71.6% 21.6% 0.0% 6.8% 148

All 3 districts 548 111 4 24 79.8% 16.2% 0.6% 3.5% 687

Table 50 Would you like more tourists to come to your community ?



Keo Oudom 48 0 0 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 48

Appendix 22

767

Vang Vieng 495 3 10 97.4% 0.6% 2.0% 508

Khong 143 1 4 96.6% 0.7% 2.7% 148

All 3 districts 686 4 14 97.4% 0.6% 2.0% 704

Table 51 If yes, why ?


To show

our

culture

To make

our daily

lives more

interesting

To earn

additional

income

To give us

gifts and

other

material

benefits

Other

To show

our

culture

To make

our daily

lives more

interesting

To earn

additional

income

To give us

gifts and

other

material

benefits

Other Total

Keo Oudom 38 25 45 10 0 32.2% 21.2% 38.1% 8.5% 0.0% 118

Vang Vieng 415 257 371 200 1 33.4% 20.7% 29.8% 16.1% 0.1% 1244

Khong 105 82 124 35 0 30.3% 23.7% 35.8% 10.1% 0.0% 346

All 3 districts 558 364 540 245 1 32.7% 21.3% 31.6% 14.3% 0.1% 1708

Table 52 If no, why not ?

Frequency

Interrupt

our daily

lives,

come too

often,

invade our

privacy

Not polite

and do not

respect our

customs

regarding

their

behaviour

or clothes

Undermine

our culture

Spend

too little

money -

No much

income

from

them

Have bad

influence

on our

children

Cause

conflicts

and

quarrels in

our

community

Take

away or

take

advantage

of our

women

Bring

diseases

Bring in

drugs

Have a bad

effect on our

natural

environment

Keo Oudom 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Vang Vieng 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0

Khong 0 5 4 1 0 7 8 1 5 1

All 3 districts 1 6 5 2 1 8 9 2 5 1

Appendix 22

768

Proportion

Interrupt

our daily

lives,

come too

often,

invade

our

privacy

Not polite

and do not

respect our

customs

regarding

their

behaviour

or clothes

Undermine

our culture

Spend

too little

money -

No

much

income

from

them

Have bad

influence

on our

children

Cause

conflicts

and

quarrels in

our

community

Take

away or

take

advantage

of our

women

Bring

diseases

Bring

in

drugs

Have a bad

effect on

our natural

environment

Total

Keo

Oudom 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4

Vang Vieng 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4

Khong 0.0% 16.1% 12.9% 3.2% 0.0% 22.6% 25.8% 3.2% 16.1% 3.2% 31

All 3

districts 2.6% 15.4% 12.8% 5.1% 2.6% 20.5% 23.1% 5.1% 12.8% 2.6% 39

Table 53 What are the three most important things you would like to show tourists in your community ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong All 3 districts

Art 5 1 6 0.0% 0.6% 0.4% 0.5%

Culture - Local

livelihood/lifestyle 16 429 65 510 19.8% 51.6% 25.1% 43.6%

Handicrafts - Local products 2 14 16 2.5% 1.7% 0.0% 1.4%

Natural sites (incl. lakes, islands,

waterfalls) 39 337 113

489 48.1% 40.6% 43.6% 41.8%

Local food 12 5 17 14.8% 0.6% 0.0% 1.5%

Fishing activity 4 23 27 4.9% 0.0% 8.9% 2.3%

Boat riding 7 7 8.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6%

Cultural/Historical sites 41 2 43 0.0% 4.9% 0.8% 3.7%

Forest 49 49 0.0% 0.0% 18.9% 4.2%

Local language 2 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.2%

Appendix 22

769

Swimming (in a natural environment) 1 1 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%

Locomotive 4 4 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.3%

Total 81 831 259 1171 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 54

What are the three most important things you would like to tell tourists not to do when they come to your

community ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang


Misbehave regarding Lao culture and

tradition 20 217 52

289 20.4% 20.8% 24.8% 21.4%

Dress inappropriately (bikini, naked, etc.) 23 247 6 276 23.5% 23.7% 2.9% 20.4%

Bring, consume or deal drugs 7 184 71 262 7.1% 17.7% 33.8% 19.4%

Follow western culture/cultural

proselytizing 3 112 115 3.1% 10.7% 0.0% 8.5%

Kissing in public 3 50 53 3.1% 4.8% 0.0% 3.9%

Throw rubbish 11 36 1 48 11.2% 3.5% 0.5% 3.6%

Drink too much/Be drunk 8 40 48 8.2% 3.8% 0.0% 3.6%

Create conflicts/Be violent 9 15 20 44 9.2% 1.4% 9.5% 3.3%

Unrespect regulations & laws 2 30 9 41 2.0% 2.9% 4.3% 3.0%

Destroy environment/damage natural

sites 3 32 5 40 3.1% 3.1% 2.4% 3.0%

Unrespect/Look down at Lao people 1 39 40 1.0% 3.7% 0.0% 3.0%

Do not follow/respect/join tour guides 22 22 0.0% 0.0% 10.5% 1.6%

Do illegal things

(deliquency/theft) 4 15 19 0.0% 0.4% 7.1% 1.4%

Drive fast/Provoke road

accident 1 15 2 18 1.0% 1.4% 1.0% 1.3%

Take advantage of Lao people 10 1 11 0.0% 1.0% 0.5% 0.8%

Not be clean (dirtiness) 4 6 10 4.1% 0.0% 2.9% 0.7%

Damage cultural sites/Destroy Lao

culture 2 5 7 2.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5%

Appendix 22

770

Be not punctual 4 4 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3%

Come only one time 1 1 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%

Religious proselytizing 1 1 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

Make noise 1 1 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

Total 98 1042 210 1350 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 55 If you like to gain more income from tourists, in what ways would you prefer to do that?

Frequency

Renting out/

selling

accomodation

Cooking

and

selling

cooked

food

Selling

food and

beverages

Selling

handicrafts

Selling

locally-

produced

alcohol

Tour

guiding/

Trekking

services

Cultural

performances Other

Keo Oudom 12 16 28 26 4 19 5 2

Vang Vieng 216 230 282 254 99 162 129 2

Khong 93 92 101 74 62 87 80 1

All 3 districts 321 338 411 354 165 268 214 5

Proportion

Renting out/

selling

accomodation

Cooking

and

selling

cooked

food

Selling

food and

beverages

Selling

handicrafts

Selling

locally-

produced

alcohol

Tour

guiding/

Trekking

services

Cultural

performances Other Total

Keo Oudom 10.7% 14.3% 25.0% 23.2% 3.6% 17.0% 4.5% 1.8% 112

Vang Vieng 15.7% 16.7% 20.5% 18.5% 7.2% 11.8% 9.4% 0.1% 1374

Khong 15.8% 15.6% 17.1% 12.5% 10.5% 14.7% 13.6% 0.2% 590

All 3 districts 15.5% 16.3% 19.8% 17.1% 7.9% 12.9% 10.3% 0.2% 2076

Table 56 Is your house/business/property affected by typhoon surges or tide erosion ?


Yes No Yes No Total

Appendix 22

771

Keo Oudom 38 5 88.4% 11.6% 43

Vang Vieng 0 6 0.0% 100.0% 6

Khong 10 141 6.6% 93.4% 151

All 3 districts 48 152 24.0% 76.0% 200

Table 57 If yes, how often do you experience this ?

Frequency

1 time

every 2-3

years

1 time

per year

2 times a

year

3-4

times a

year

5-6

times a

year

> 6 times

a year

Always or

many times Sometimes Rarely

Keo Oudom 0 1 4 4 15 8 2 2 1

Vang Vieng 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Khong 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

All 3 districts 2 4 4 4 15 8 3 2 1

Proportion

1 time

every 2-3

years

1 time

per year

2 times a

year

3-4

times a

year

5-6

times a

year

> 6 times

a year

Always or

many

times

Sometimes Rarely Total

Keo Oudom 0.0% 2.7% 10.8% 10.8% 40.5% 21.6% 5.4% 5.4% 2.7% 37

Vang Vieng 0

Khong 33.3% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 6

All 3 districts 4.7% 9.3% 9.3% 9.3% 34.9% 18.6% 7.0% 4.7% 2.3% 43

Appendix 22

772

11. Training and Capacity-Building

Table 59

Has any household member received training in the

last two years ?



Keo Oudom 5 78 18 5.0% 77.2% 17.8% 101

Vang Vieng 24 518 813 1.8% 38.2% 60.0% 1355

Khong 13 134 213 3.6% 37.2% 59.2% 360

All 3 districts 42 730 1044 2.3% 40.2% 57.5% 1816

Table 60.1 What kind of training was received during the last two years?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang


Guest-house/Hotel service 1 7 8 0.0% 5.6% 30.4% 17.8%

Nature/environment/forest

protection & conservation 3 4 7 0.0% 16.7% 17.4% 15.6%

Cooking 1 4 2 7 25.0% 22.2% 8.7% 15.6%

Restaurant 1 3 4 25.0% 0.0% 13.0% 8.9%

Housemaid 4 4 0.0% 22.2% 0.0% 8.9%

Tour guiding 1 3 4 25.0% 0.0% 13.0% 8.9%

Service 1 2 3 0.0% 5.6% 8.7% 6.7%

Laws 2 2 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 4.4%

Alcohol 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 4.3% 2.2%

Agriculture 1 1 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 2.2%

Cemetery conservation 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 4.3% 2.2%

First aid 1 1 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2%

Handicrafts 1 1 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 2.2%

Politics 1 1 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 2.2%

Total 4 18 23 45 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Appendix 22

773

Table 60.2 Member of the HH who received the training (in relation to the household head)


Head of

household Son Parent

Sibling

(Sister/

Brother)

Other

Live in

domestic

worker

Head of


Sibling

(Sister/

Brother)

Other

Live in

domestic

worker

Total

Keo Oudom 0 1 1 0 0 0 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2

Vang Vieng 19 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19

Khong 9 1 6 1 0 1 50.0% 5.6% 33.3% 5.6% 0.0% 5.6% 18

All 3 districts 28 2 7 1 0 1 71.8% 5.1% 17.9% 2.6% 0.0% 2.6% 39

Table 60.3 Whether or not the training was/is being utilized ?



Keo Oudom 4 1 80.0% 20.0% 0.0% 5

Vang Vieng 17 1 94.4% 5.6% 0.0% 18

Khong 12 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12

All 3 districts 33 2 0 94.3% 5.7% 0.0% 35

Table 60.4 Sex of the HH member who received the training


M F M F Total

Keo Oudom 1 2 33.3% 66.7% 3

Vang Vieng 10 8 55.6% 44.4% 18

Khong 11 9 55.0% 45.0% 20

All 3 districts 22 19 53.7% 46.3% 41

Table 61 Would you or any HH member like to be trained in, or learn something new ?



Keo Oudom 33 11 1 73.3% 24.4% 2.2% 45

Appendix 22

774

Vang Vieng 166 51 37 65.4% 20.1% 14.6% 254

Khong 55 10 86 36.4% 6.6% 57.0% 151

All 3 districts 254 72 124 56.4% 16.0% 27.6% 450

Table 62.1 What kind of training, learning or capacity building desired ?


Keo Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Cooking 17 43 29 89 29.8% 23.4% 46.0% 29.3%

Tourism management/Tourist

services 2 65 6 73 3.5% 35.3% 9.5% 24.0%

English language 4 14 4 22 7.0% 7.6% 6.3% 7.2%

Agriculture 1 15 16 1.8% 8.2% 0.0% 5.3%

Hotel/guest-house & restaurant

service 4 7 3 14 7.0% 3.8% 4.8% 4.6%

Tour guiding 4 2 5 11 7.0% 1.1% 7.9% 3.6%

Computing 2 7 9 3.5% 3.8% 0.0% 3.0%

Business management 4 4 8 7.0% 2.2% 0.0% 2.6%

Foreign language 3 3 2 8 5.3% 1.6% 3.2% 2.6%

Mechanics 3 3 6 5.3% 0.0% 4.8% 2.0%

Chinese language 5 5 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 1.6%

Marketing 4 1 5 7.0% 0.5% 0.0% 1.6%

Handicrafts 4 1 5 0.0% 2.2% 1.6% 1.6%

Mushroom production 5 5 0.0% 0.0% 7.9% 1.6%

Souvenir design 4 4 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 1.3%

Forest conservation 3 3 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% 1.0%

Accountancy 2 2 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7%

Construction 2 2 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7%

Sewing 2 2 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.7%

Housemaid 2 2 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.7%

Skill training 2 2 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7%

Appendix 22

775

Hairdressing 2 2 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.7%

Frog raising 1 1 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3%

Basketry 1 1 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%

Carpentry 1 1 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%

Cemetery conservation 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 0.3%

Development 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 0.3%

Hotel management 1 1 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3%

Laws 1 1 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3%

Livestock production 1 1 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%

ODOP products 1 1 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3%

Total 57 184 63 304 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 62.2 Member of the HH whom you wish to receive the training (in relation to the household head)


Head of


Sibling

(Sister/

Brother)

Other

Live in

domestic

worker

Head of


Sibling

(Sister/

Brother)

Other

Live in

domestic

worker

Total

Keo Oudom 14 28 0 2 2 0 30.4% 60.9% 0.0% 4.3% 4.3% 0.0% 46

Vang Vieng 36 62 7 1 15 0 29.8% 51.2% 5.8% 0.8% 12.4% 0.0% 121

Khong 10 10 19 3 0 1 23.3% 23.3% 44.2% 7.0% 0.0% 2.3% 43

All 3 districts 60 100 26 6 17 1 28.6% 47.6% 12.4% 2.9% 8.1% 0.5% 210

Table 62.3 Sex of the HH member who received the training


M F M F Total

Keo Oudom 18 23 43.9% 56.1% 41

Vang Vieng 46 78 37.1% 62.9% 124

Khong 18 3 85.7% 14.3% 21

All 3 districts 82 104 44.1% 55.9% 186

Appendix 22

776

12. Community Development and Participation

Table 63.1 What is the first priority for the development/improvement of this community ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Road improvement 17 186 11 214 36.2% 50.3% 7.7% 38.2%

School 5 90 95 10.6% 0.0% 62.9% 17.0%

Small road (access to houses) 43 43 0.0% 11.6% 0.0% 7.7%

Tap water 3 19 22 6.4% 5.1% 0.0% 3.9%

Environment protection 1 14 6 21 2.1% 3.8% 4.2% 3.8%

Bridge 17 17 0.0% 4.6% 0.0% 3.0%

Canal 17 17 0.0% 4.6% 0.0% 3.0%

Market 15 15 0.0% 0.0% 10.5% 2.7%

Public sanitation 11 2 13 0.0% 3.0% 1.4% 2.3%

Electricity 1 10 11 2.1% 2.7% 0.0% 2.0%

Touristic places/sites 2 9 11 4.3% 2.4% 0.0% 2.0%

Waste treatment 3 8 11 6.4% 2.2% 0.0% 2.0%

Clean WS system 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 4.9% 1.3%

Street lights 7 7 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 1.3%

Community development 1 5 6 2.1% 1.4% 0.0% 1.1%

Hospital 1 5 6 2.1% 0.0% 3.5% 1.1%

Megaphone 5 5 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.9%

Public toilets 3 1 4 6.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.7%

Garbage collection and management 1 2 3 0.0% 0.3% 1.4% 0.5%

Village facilities 3 3 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.5%

Permanent housing area 3 3 6.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5%

Skill training 3 3 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.5%

Education 1 1 2 2.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4%

Happiness 2 2 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.4%

Human resources development 2 2 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.4%

Irrigation systems 2 2 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.4%

Appendix 22

777

Safety 2 2 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.4%

Footpath 2 2 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.4%

Trade place 2 2 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%

VAT adjustment 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Community empowerment 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Factory development 1 1 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Information system 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Meeting place 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Community organization 1 1 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Temple 1 1 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Village office 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Wharf 1 1 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Total 47 370 143 560 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 63.2 What is the second priority for the development/improvement of this community ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Dispensary/Hospital 1 100 101 0.0% 0.3% 70.9% 18.6%

Canal 1 56 57 2.2% 15.7% 0.0% 10.5%


Bridge 49 49 0.0% 13.8% 0.0% 9.0%

Tap water 4 26 30 8.7% 7.3% 0.0% 5.5%

School 2 19 6 27 4.3% 5.3% 4.3% 5.0%

Waste treatment 2 25 27 4.3% 7.0% 0.0% 5.0%


Touristic places/sites 1 16 2 19 2.2% 4.5% 1.4% 3.5%

Economic development/job opportunities 2 16 18 4.3% 4.5% 0.0% 3.3%

Environment/Forest protection 8 9 17 0.0% 2.2% 6.4% 3.1%

Street lights 1 15 16 2.2% 4.2% 0.0% 2.9%

Appendix 22

778

Community development 13 13 0.0% 3.7% 0.0% 2.4%

Electricity 1 9 10 2.2% 2.5% 0.0% 1.8%

Market 1 1 6 8 2.2% 0.3% 4.3% 1.5%

Parking lot 3 5 8 6.5% 1.4% 0.0% 1.5%

Wharf 7 7 15.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3%

Culture 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 4.3% 1.1%

Good housing area 6 6 13.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1%

Megaphone 5 5 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.9%

Garbage collection and

management 3 2 5 0.0% 0.8% 1.4% 0.9%


Public toilets 2 2 4 0.0% 0.6% 1.4% 0.7%

Skill training 4 4 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.7%


Clean WS system 1 1 1 3 2.2% 0.3% 0.7% 0.6%

Safety 2 1 3 0.0% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6%

Training on foreign language 2 2 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.4%

Livestock development 2 2 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.4%

Temple 1 1 2 2.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4%

Trade place 2 2 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%

Poverty reduction 2 2 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.4%

Transportation services 1 1 2 2.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4%

Village facilities 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Factory development 1 1 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Information system/Communication 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Meeting place 1 1 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Computer lab 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Drainage system 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Good services 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Development funds 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Total 46 356 141 543 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Appendix 22

779

Table 63.3 What is the third priority for the development/improvement of this community ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang



School 4 46 50 9.5% 14.3% 0.0% 10.1%

Street lights 25 25 0.0% 7.8% 0.0% 5.0%

Tap water 7 17 24 16.7% 5.3% 0.0% 4.8%


Waste treatment 2 16 18 4.8% 5.0% 0.0% 3.6%

Parking lot 2 16 18 4.8% 5.0% 0.0% 3.6%

Garbage collection and management 18 18 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 3.6%

Touristic places/sites 1 14 15 2.4% 4.4% 0.0% 3.0%


Bridge 12 12 0.0% 3.7% 0.0% 2.4%


Community development 1 10 11 2.4% 3.1% 0.0% 2.2%

Market 2 9 11 0.0% 0.6% 6.7% 2.2%

Safety 2 9 11 0.0% 0.6% 6.7% 2.2%

Access to knowledge 11 11 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 2.2%

Canal 10 10 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 2.0%

Trade place 3 7 10 7.1% 2.2% 0.0% 2.0%

Megaphone 7 7 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 1.4%

Environment/Forest protection 4 2 6 0.0% 1.2% 1.5% 1.2%

Public toilets 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% 1.2%

Meeting place 6 6 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 1.2%

Sport area 6 6 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 1.2%

Dispensary/Hospital 4 1 5 9.5% 0.0% 0.7% 1.0%

Economic development/job opportunities 1 4 5 2.4% 1.2% 0.0% 1.0%

Appendix 22

780

Skill training 5 5 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 1.0%

Transportation services 3 1 4 0.0% 0.9% 0.7% 0.8%

Training centre 3 1 4 7.1% 0.0% 0.7% 0.8%

Electricity 3 3 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.6%

Wharf 1 1 2 2.4% 0.0% 0.7% 0.4%

Culture 1 1 2 2.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4%

Good housing area 1 1 2 2.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4%

Training on foreign language 2 2 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.4%

Temple 1 1 2 2.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4%

Investment/Development/Credit

funds 1 1 2 2.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4%

Drinking water factory 2 2 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%

Clean WS system 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Village office 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Enforce regulations against drugs use and

trafficking 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Flowers along the road 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Good health staff 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Local brand production 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Scholarship 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Individual toilets/latrines 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Total 42 321 134 497 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 64 Which group/activities do you or other members of your household participate in ?


Women'

s Union/

Associat

ion

Youth

League/

Associat

ion

Farmers

Associatio

n

Governm

ent-

initiated

activities

Other None

Women's

Union/

Association

Youth

League/

Association

Farmers

Associati

on

Govern

ment-

initiated

activitie

s

Other None Total

Appendix 22

781

Keo

Oudom 30 23 0 4 6 0 47.6% 36.5% 0.0% 6.3% 9.5% 0.0% 63

Vang

Vieng 310 293 61 43 24 3 42.2% 39.9% 8.3% 5.9% 3.3% 0.4% 734

Khong 66 41 32 16 0 0 42.6% 26.5% 20.6% 10.3% 0.0% 0.0% 155

All 3

districts 406 357 93 63 30 3 42.6% 37.5% 9.8% 6.6% 3.2% 0.3% 952

Other = Tour boat asssociation 2 Keo Oudom

Head of unit ? 4 Vang Vieng

Party member 13 Vang Vieng

Village administration

staff 1 Vang Vieng

Village security 4 Vang Vieng

Village credit fund 6 Khong

Army organization 1 Khong

TOTAL 31

Table 65

Are there activities, projects, or decisions about the community in which you

would like to be involved ?



Keo Oudom 33 6 11 66.0% 12.0% 22.0% 50

Vang Vieng 207 222 125 37.4% 40.1% 22.6% 554

Khong 120 5 25 80.0% 3.3% 16.7% 150

All 3 districts 360 233 161 47.7% 30.9% 21.4% 754

Appendix 22

782

Table 66 If yes, what are these ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Participation to all project activities/decisions 7 137 144 38.9% 90.7% 85.2%

Participation in new housing area construction 6 1 7 33.3% 0.7% 4.1%

Participation in road construction 1 6 7 5.6% 4.0% 4.1%

Activities and decisions on community development 3 3 0.0% 2.0% 1.8%

Activities and decisions on education 2 2 0.0% 1.3% 1.2%

Participation in wharf re-building 2 2 11.1% 0.0% 1.2%

Activities and decisions on tourism 2 2 0.0% 1.3% 1.2%

Participation in market re-construction 1 1 5.6% 0.0% 0.6%

Participation in building a new trading place 1 1 5.6% 0.0% 0.6%

Total 18 151 0 169 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

13. Environment

Table 73 What aspects the Environment includes ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang


Drinking water quality & availability 21 191 21 233 8.7% 11.2% 12.2% 11.0%

Rivers, lakes, reservoirs, coast/sea 21 134 16 171 8.7% 7.9% 9.3% 8.1%

Groundwater 13 65 14 92 5.4% 3.8% 8.1% 4.4%

Air quality 24 218 10 252 10.0% 12.8% 5.8% 11.9%

Climate 23 165 8 196 9.5% 9.7% 4.7% 9.3%

Land and soil 23 187 7 217 9.5% 11.0% 4.1% 10.3%

Trees, vegetation 26 185 16 227 10.8% 10.9% 9.3% 10.7%

Terrestrial & aquatic animals 25 119 13 157 10.4% 7.0% 7.6% 7.4%

Ecological protected areas 15 122 11 148 6.2% 7.2% 6.4% 7.0%

Appendix 22

783

Land & water uses 16 60 13 89 6.6% 3.5% 7.6% 4.2%

Public safety 19 140 15 174 7.9% 8.2% 8.7% 8.2%

Public movements & access 6 35 14 55 2.5% 2.1% 8.1% 2.6%

Cultural values 9 78 14 101 3.7% 4.6% 8.1% 4.8%

Total 241 1699 172 2112 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 74 What will be the benefits to your family, or to the village & community of the subproject ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang


Improved road/transportation facilities -

Improved traffic 15 120 61 196 20.0% 28.4% 43.3% 30.7%

Improved conveniences 1 107 108 1.3% 25.3% 0.0% 16.9%

Better life/Improved livelihoods 19 82 2 103 25.3% 19.4% 1.4% 16.1%

Improved village facilities 1 2 46 49 1.3% 0.5% 32.6% 7.7%

Increased income/Economic benefits 5 15 13 33 6.7% 3.5% 9.2% 5.2%

Increased population of tourists and

tourism activities 3 14 16 33 4.0% 3.3% 11.3% 5.2%

Beautiful and cleaner village/community 6 24 30 8.0% 5.7% 0.0% 4.7%

Community development 1 19 1 21 1.3% 4.5% 0.7% 3.3%

Trash treatment facility 1 18 19 1.3% 4.3% 0.0% 3.0%

Wharf 8 8 10.7% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3%

New bridge 6 6 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.9%

New housing area 5 5 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8%

Develop tourist sites 4 1 5 5.3% 0.2% 0.0% 0.8%

Increased trading activities 1 3 4 1.3% 0.7% 0.0% 0.6%

Cleaned road 3 3 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.5%

Garbage place 3 3 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.5%

Better environment 2 2 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3%

Benefits for agricultural sector 2 2 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3%

Parking lots 2 2 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%

Appendix 22

784

Less road accidents - More safety 1 1 2 0.0% 0.2% 0.7% 0.3%

District development 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Canal 1 1 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

New market 1 1 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Public toilets 1 1 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Less pollution 1 1 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2%

Total 75 423 141 639 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 75 Does your family or village have any environmental concerns with the subproject ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Environment damages 7 121 15 143 11.5% 26.7% 11.4% 22.1%

No concerns - Good project - Positive impacts on

life/livelihood 1 57 67 125 1.6% 12.6% 50.8% 19.3%

Waste/Garbage/Trash collection and management 13 11 34 58 21.3% 2.4% 25.8% 9.0%

Pollution (water resources) 9 37 1 47 14.8% 8.1% 0.8% 7.3%

Noise 1 38 39 1.6% 8.4% 0.0% 6.0%

Dust - Mud 1 24 6 31 1.6% 5.3% 4.5% 4.8%

Road accidents - Safety 6 22 28 9.8% 4.8% 0.0% 4.3%

Road obstruction - Traffic problems 27 27 0.0% 5.9% 0.0% 4.2%

Impact on houses 20 3 23 0.0% 4.4% 2.3% 3.6%

Bad smell 1 17 18 1.6% 3.7% 0.0% 2.8%

Increased population of insects 1 17 18 1.6% 3.7% 0.0% 2.8%

Project not completed 15 15 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 2.3%

Slow or delayed implementation 1 14 15 1.6% 3.1% 0.0% 2.3%

Dirtiness 8 2 4 14 13.1% 0.4% 3.0% 2.2%

Concern on road quality/sustainability 1 9 1 11 1.6% 2.0% 0.8% 1.7%

Impact on houses near the road 6 6 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 0.9%

Negative impact on livelihood/life 1 4 5 1.6% 0.9% 0.0% 0.8%

Road does not reach all houses 5 5 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.8%

Appendix 22

785

Negative impact on trading activities/place 4 4 6.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6%

Low responsibility of project

operators/contractors 1 2 3 1.6% 0.4% 0.0% 0.5%

Overcrowded population 2 2 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%

Floods 2 2 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3%

Increased deliquency 2 2 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%

Problems of drainage 1 1 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2%

Bridge damaged 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.2%

Climate change 1 1 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2%

Need for good operation plan 1 1 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2%

Public toilets 1 1 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

No place for work 1 1 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2%

Total 61 454 132 647 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 76

Does your family or village have environmental concerns with the construction phase activities of the

subproject ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Dust - Mud 4 59 41 104 8.0% 14.0% 29.3% 17.0%

No concerns - No negative impacts - Good

standard 35 52 87 0.0% 8.3% 37.1% 14.2%

Road obstruction - Traffic difficulties 6 64 1 71 12.0% 15.2% 0.7% 11.6%

Dirtiness - Trash/waste/garbage 4 37 18 59 8.0% 8.8% 12.9% 9.7%

Negative impact on environmental aspects (incl.

landslides, erosion, etc.) 2 31 18 51 4.0% 7.4% 12.9% 8.3%

Noise 2 41 1 44 4.0% 9.7% 0.7% 7.2%

Accidents - Safety 5 34 39 10.0% 8.1% 0.0% 6.4%

Pollution (air and water) 6 21 27 12.0% 5.0% 0.0% 4.4%

Project not or not fully completed (initial

objectives not reached) 1 19 1 21 2.0% 4.5% 0.7% 3.4%

Appendix 22

786

Do not follow operation plan 17 1 18 0.0% 4.0% 0.7% 2.9%

Project operators not

careful/responsible 1 14 15 2.0% 3.3% 0.0% 2.5%

Impact on houses 9 5 14 0.0% 2.1% 3.6% 2.3%

Slow or delayed implementation 2 8 10 4.0% 1.9% 0.0% 1.6%

Drainage problems 1 8 9 2.0% 1.9% 0.0% 1.5%

Bad smell 7 7 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 1.1%

Negative impact on livelihood and family economy 5 2 7 10.0% 0.5% 0.0% 1.1%

No financial compensation 6 6 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 1.0%

Negative impact on trading activities/place 6 6 12.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0%

Climate change 4 4 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.7%

Increased population of insects 4 4 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.7%

Dirty road 3 3 6.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5%

Road construction not completed 2 2 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.3%

45 families should stay at the actual housing area 1 1 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Impact on (agricultural) land 1 1 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2%

Outsiders stay after the end of project 1 1 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Total 50 421 140 611 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 77

Does your family or village have environmental concerns with the operation of the completed

subproject ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

No concerns - Good project - Positive impacts on

life/livelihood 2 68 53 123 4.7% 18.1% 38.4% 22.1%

Road accidents - Safety 1 41 45 87 2.3% 10.9% 32.6% 15.6%

Construction area not clean/cleared ("big mess") 18 67 2 87 41.9% 17.8% 1.4% 15.6%

Environment damages 3 45 3 51 7.0% 12.0% 2.2% 9.2%

Do not follow operation plan 1 28 29 2.3% 7.4% 0.0% 5.2%

More Waste/Garbage/Trash 4 16 2 22 9.3% 4.3% 1.4% 3.9%

Appendix 22

787

Impact on houses 19 19 0.0% 5.1% 0.0% 3.4%

Low responsibility of project

operators/contractors 18 18 0.0% 4.8% 0.0% 3.2%

Road bad quality/low sustainability 6 11 17 0.0% 1.6% 8.0% 3.1%

Needs for monitoring and maintenance 2 11 13 0.0% 0.5% 8.0% 2.3%

Project not completed 1 11 12 2.3% 2.9% 0.0% 2.2%

More noise 9 9 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 1.6%

Road obstruction - Traffic problems 8 8 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 1.4%

Bad smell 7 7 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 1.3%

Problems of drainage 7 7 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 1.3%

Low responsibility of villagers 6 6 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 1.1%

No housing area at the end of the project 5 5 11.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9%

Outsiders stay after the end of project 5 5 11.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9%

Need for traffic lights 4 4 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.7%

Increased population of insects 4 4 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.7%

Project not sustainable or not good 4 4 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 0.7%

Dust - Mud 3 3 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 0.5%

Water pollution 3 3 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.5%

Low involvement/participation of community 2 2 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.4%

Negative impact on trading activities/place 1 1 2 0.0% 0.3% 0.7% 0.4%

Need for traffic signs 2 2 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.4%


Disorganized community 1 1 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

No tourists/visitors 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Project too close to village 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Road construction not completed 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Slow implementation 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Increased deliquency 1 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.2%

Total 43 376 138 557 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Appendix 22

788

Table 78

Does your family or village think the subproject design or operation should be changed to prevent

negative environmental or community impacts ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Agree with project design/operation 1 38 50 89 3.0% 11.4% 38.2% 17.9%

Facilitate community empowerment and

participation (through meetings) 3 75 1 79 9.1% 22.5% 0.8% 15.9%

Avoid environment damages and keep the

community clean 1 47 48 3.0% 14.1% 0.0% 9.7%

Provide traffic signs to guarantee safety 36 36 0.0% 10.8% 0.0% 7.2%

Guarantee high quality standard and sustainable

project 1 27 3 31 3.0% 8.1% 2.3% 6.2%

Establish good M&E and maintenance plan 4 24 28 0.0% 1.2% 18.3% 5.6%

Establish good operation plan (incl. impact and

technical studies) 5 18 5 28 15.2% 5.4% 3.8% 5.6%

Build high quality and sustainable road 6 19 25 0.0% 1.8% 14.5% 5.0%

Provide street lights 23 23 0.0% 6.9% 0.0% 4.6%

Avoid impacts on villagers houses/land 1 2 15 18 3.0% 0.6% 11.5% 3.6%

Prepare and build new housing area before

resettlement 9 5 14 27.3% 1.5% 0.0% 2.8%

Provide financial compensation 6 7 13 0.0% 1.8% 5.3% 2.6%

Implement project far away from the community 12 12 0.0% 3.6% 0.0% 2.4%

Responsible project operators 1 9 1 11 3.0% 2.7% 0.8% 2.2%

Respect laws and regulations 7 7 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 1.4%

Avoid accidents/Guarantee safety 6 6 0.0% 1.8% 0.0% 1.2%

Prepare and implement activities related to public

sanitation 1 4 1 6 3.0% 1.2% 0.8% 1.2%

Follow operation plan 1 4 5 3.0% 1.2% 0.0% 1.0%

Garbage collection and management 5 5 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 1.0%


Establish specific rules for the area 1 2 3 3.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6%

Appendix 22

789

Build new trading place before resettlement 1 1 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Complete project before

resettlement 1 1 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Provide training on culture 1 1 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Facilitate community and livelihood development 1 1 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Sign contract first 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Build canal 1 1 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2%

Total 33 333 131 497 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 79 Is there anything else you would like to add ?


Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Keo

Oudom

Vang

Vieng Khong

All 3

districts

Project operators have to be honest with villagers 6 6 0.0% 31.6% 18.2%

Project implemented in a correct and good way 1 1 7.1% 0.0% 3.0%

All the area must be developed 1 1 0.0% 5.3% 3.0%

Everything is owned by everyone 1 1 7.1% 0.0% 3.0%

Project implementation should be fast 2 7 9 14.3% 36.8% 27.3%

Priority must be given to people who lived before 1 1 7.1% 0.0% 3.0%

Build small road to reach each house in the village 2 2 0.0% 10.5% 6.1%

Undertake good analysis before project

implementation 1 1 7.1% 0.0% 3.0%

No financial rent cost for new housing area 4 4 28.6% 0.0% 12.1%

Organize the new housing area for villagers 1 1 7.1% 0.0% 3.0%

Define specific rules 1 1 7.1% 0.0% 3.0%

Want to stay at the actual housing area 1 1 7.1% 0.0% 3.0%

Villagers must be involved in the whole project

implementation 1 1 0.0% 5.3% 3.0%

Will the project be completed ? 2 2 0.0% 10.5% 6.1%

What about the work place ? 1 1 7.1% 0.0% 3.0%

Total 14 19 0 33 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Appendix 22

790

14. Some data and graphs by subproject components

2.6 Household members who contribute to household income

C1 C2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Frequency

Yes 8 29 5 33 95 35 15 220

No 24 45 15 50 129 44 18 325

2.9. Household member working away from home

Subproject Yes No Total

C1 11 24 35

C2 25 75 100

V1 7 33 40

V2 34 74 108

V3 91 197 288

V4 25 77 102

V5 12 22 34

Frequency 205 502 707

Percent 29.00 71.00 100.00

Subproject C1 C2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Frequency Percent

Yes 11 25 7 34 91 25 12 205 29.00

No 24 75 33 74 197 77 22 502 71.00

Total 35 100 40 108 288 102 34 707 100.00

Yes No

Frequency 220 325

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Appendix 22

791

2.10 Household member working away from home contributing in the household/family income

Subproject Yes No Total

C1 8 24 32

C2 29 45 74

V1 5 15 20

V2 33 50 83

V3 95 129 224

V4 35 44 79

V5 15 18 33

Frequency 220 325 545

Percent 40.37 59.63 100.00

Subproject C1 C2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Frequency Percent

Yes 8 29 5 33 95 35 15 220 40.37

No 24 45 15 50 129 44 18 325 59.63

Total 32 74 20 83 224 79 33 545 100.00

Frequency Percent

Yes 205 29.00

No 502 71.00

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Appendix 22

792


3.1 Number of years household has lived in the community

Sub project C1 C2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Frequency

< 2 years 1 1 2

2-5 years 1 1 3 5 2 12

6-10 years 5 6 4 8 10 8 2 43

> 10 years 16 27 13 41 94 44 9 244

always here 18 77 31 61 192 51 24 454

Total 40 111 48 113 301 105 35 753

Frequency Percent

Yes 220 40.37

No 325 59.63

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

< 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years > 10 years always here Total

Frequency 2 12 43 244 454 753

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Appendix 22

793

3.2. Ownership to house/dwelling

Ownership dwelling Frequency Percent

Rented 18.00 3.94

Owned 417.00 91.25

Other 22.00 4.81

Total 457.00 100.00

3.3 Land ownership and total land in square metres

Site of

farmland C1 C2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Grand Total

0.1 1 2 3

0.2 1 1 2

0.3 2 2

0.5 3 4 4 3 14

0.7 1 1

0.8 2 2

1 6 15 7 19 46 13 8 114

1.1 1 1

1.3 1 1

1.5 3 2 1 6

1.7 1 1

2 3 3 4 9 8 2 1 30

2.1 1 1

2.4 1 1

2.5 2 2

3 1 1 4 6

5 1 1

Rented Owned Other Total

Frequency 18 417 22 457

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Appendix 22

794

Frequency 9 19 11 34 73 28 14 188

Percent 4.79 10.11 5.85 18.09 38.83 14.89 7.45 100.00

3.4. Household subsistence from land

owned/rented

Sub project C1 C2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Frequency Percent

More than self-

subsistent 15 35 10 47 56 21 11 195 33.45

Self-subsistent 13 43 18 49 181 61 23 388 66.55

Not self-subsistent 0 0.00

More than self-

subsistent 0.54 0.45 0.36 0.49 0.24 0.26 0.32 2.65 0.45

Self-subsistent 0.46 0.55 0.64 0.51 0.76 0.74 0.68 4.35 0.75

Not self-subsistent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 28 78 28 96 237 82 34 583 100.00

Sub project C1 C2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Frequency Percent

Rented 1 1 1 3 3 8 1 18 3.94

Owned 27 60 24 82 152 43 29 417 91.25

Other 6 1 2 13 22 4.81

Total 28 67 26 87 168 51 30 457 100

Rented Owned Other

Frequency 18 417 22

Percent 3.94 91.25 4.81

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Appendix 22

795

3.5 Household ownership to vegetable gardens

Vegetable garden C1 C2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Frequency

Yes 15 35 10 47 56 21 11 195

No 13 43 18 49 181 61 23 388

Total 28 78 28 96 237 82 34 583

3.6 Household subsistence from vegetables produced in the gardens

Households C1 C2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Frequency

More than self-subsistent 15 35 10 47 56 21 11 195

Self-subsistent 13 43 18 49 181 61 23 388

Not self-subsistent 0

Total 28 78 28 96 237 82 34 583

3.7 List of crops planted/harvested and mode of selling of each crop harvested, partial or

whole?

List of crops

Sell all or part of this crop

Row Labels Yes No Total

Banana 2 4 6

Cashewnut 0 0 0

Coconut 0 0 0

Corn 0 1 1

Epinard - Onion 0 0 0

Epinard - Onion leaf 0 0 0

Fruit 0 2 2

Lime 0 2 2

Lotus - Epinard 0 0 0

Mango 0 0 0

Onion leaf 0 0 0

orange 0 1 1

Rice 19 30 49

Rose wood 0 0 0

Salade 0 0 0

Vegetables 0 0 0

Veggies 1 1 2

Total 22 41 63

3.9 Socio-economic situation of mosts household in the community

Sub project C1 C2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Frequency

Relatively well off 15 6 2 23

Have just enough to live 37 92 48 107 264 83 32 663

Appendix 22

796

Poor 3 3 7 26 19 3 61

very poor 1 4 5

Total 40 111 48 114 300 104 35 752

4.4 Household connection to electricity/power grid

Subproject C1 C2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 Frequency

Yes 40 110 48 112 295 106 35 746

No 1 2 6 9

Total 40 111 48 114 301 106 35 755

Relatively well

off

Have just

enough to livePoor very poor Total

Frequency 23 663 61 5 752

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Percent

Yes 98.81

No 1.19

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Yes No

II. FINANCIAL DATA

Amount excl. tax Tax

Amount incl. tax Category ADB Grant Government Works Package

Goods Package

USD 10% USD

Civil Works/ Equipment/

Resettlement USD USD USD USD Champasak Province

1.1.1 3.3km concrete road, 6m wide, inc drains 3,198,997 319,900 3,518,897 Civil Works 3,518,897 3,518,897 1.1.2 56m concrete road along river, 3m wide 8,400 840 9,240 Civil Works 9,240 9,240 1.1.3 56m riverside footpath 2,800 280 3,080 Civil Works 3,080 3,080 1.1.4 30m concrete river embankment to NW 3,000 300 3,300 Civil Works 3,300 3,300 1.1.5 15m concrete river embankment to SE 1,500 150 1,650 Civil Works 1,650 1,650 1.1.6 Boat access steps 10,000 1,000 11,000 Civil Works 11,000 11,000 1.1.7 Floating pontoons x 2 30,000 3,000 33,000 Civil Works 33,000 33,000 1.1.8 Main 1000mm drain outlet diversion 10,000 1,000 11,000 Civil Works 11,000 11,000 1.1.9 Tourist centre access improvements 20,000 2,000 22,000 Civil Works 22,000 22,000 1.1.10 Resettlement - - Resettlement -

Subtotal 3,284,697 328,470 3,613,167 3,613,167 - 3,613,167 -

1.2.1 Don Det to bridge concrete road 3m wide, 2.1km 302,704 30,270 332,974 Civil Works 332,974 332,974 1.2.2 Bridge to Hang Khone, concrete road 3m wide, 4.81km 354,885 35,489 390,374 Civil Works 390,374 390,374 1.2.3 Passing bays x 10 100,000 10,000 110,000 Civil Works 110,000 110,000 1.2.4 Village concrete roads, including drains, 3m wide, 4.05km 1,800,256 180,026 1,980,282 Civil Works 1,980,282 1,980,282

1.2.5Footpath improvements on public land: Cycle/walkway (gravel with kerbs) 1.5m wide, 7,02km 157,939 15,794 173,733 Civil Works 173,733 173,733

1.2.6 Footpath improvements on public land: 10 Bridges span 20m 500,000 50,000 550,000 Civil Works 550,000 550,000 1.2.7 Decorative lighting at bridge 20,000 2,000 22,000 Civil Works 22,000 22,000 1.2.8 Carparks x 2 50,000 5,000 55,000 Civil Works 55,000 55,000 1.2.9 Resettlement - - Resettlement -

Subtotal 3,285,784 328,578 3,614,362 3,614,362 - 3,614,362 - Vientiane Province

1.3.1 Boat pier and harbor development 1,677,997 167,800 1,845,797 Civil Works 1,845,797 1,845,797 1.3.2 2-level walkway around port area and embankment 1,000,000 100,000 1,100,000 Civil Works 1,100,000 1,100,000 1.3.3 Demolish & remove Fisheries building & warehouse 50,000 5,000 55,000 Civil Works 55,000 55,000 1.3.4 Demolish & remove existing northernmost pier 50,000 5,000 55,000 Civil Works 55,000 55,000 1.3.5 Water recreation centre 250,000 25,000 275,000 Civil Works 275,000 275,000 1.3.6 Loop road 1,936,263 193,626 2,129,889 Civil Works 2,129,889 2,129,889 1.3.7 Carpark (clearing, earthworks, seal, drainage) 300,000 30,000 330,000 Civil Works 330,000 330,000 1.3.8 Landscaping 50,000 5,000 55,000 Civil Works 55,000 55,000 1.3.9 Wastewater holding tank & access road 50,000 5,000 55,000 Civil Works 55,000 55,000 1.3.10 Portable pump for boat wastewater 20,000 2,000 22,000 Civil Works 22,000 22,000 1.3.11 Solid waste transfer station 100,000 10,000 110,000 Civil Works 110,000 110,000 1.3.12 Shuttle vehicles & associated stations 100,000 10,000 110,000 Civil Works 110,000 110,000 1.3.13 Resettlement - - Resettlement -

Subtotal 5,584,260 558,426 6,142,686 6,142,686 - 6,142,686 -

1.4.1 New 4m wide concrete road 6km 1,722,497 172,250 1,894,747 Civil Works 1,894,747 1,894,747 1.4.2 Roadside drains through Ban Naduang 450m 45,000 4,500 49,500 Civil Works 49,500 49,500

1.4.3 Carpark 875m2 25,000 2,500 27,500 Civil Works 27,500 27,500

1.4.4 Steps, landscaping 25,000 2,500 27,500 Civil Works 27,500 27,500 1.4.5 Buildings 100,000 10,000 110,000 Civil Works 110,000 110,000 1.4.6 Footpath to falls 300m 15,000 1,500 16,500 Civil Works 16,500 16,500 1.4.7 Suspension bridge 50,000 5,000 55,000 Civil Works 55,000 55,000 1.4.8 Resettlement - Resettlement -

Subtotal 1,982,497 198,250 2,180,747 2,180,747 - 2,180,747 -

COST ESTIMATE OF OUTPUT 1

No. Activity

1.1: C1 Nakasang Access Road and Port Rehabilitation

1.2: C2 Don Det-Don Khone Access Improvements

1.3: V1 Nam Ngum Reservoir Access Improvements

1.4: V2 Kaeng Yui Waterfall Access Improvements



Goods Package

USD 10% USD


Resettlement USD USD USD USD No. Activity

1.5.16m road DBST loop road 26km, including 4km to Ban Phonxay and 1km for Ban Phathong & Phonxang 3,633,658 363,366 3,997,024 Civil Works 3,997,024 3,997,024

1.5.2 Steel plate for bridge resurfacing 100,000 10,000 110,000 Civil Works 110,000 110,000 1.5.3 New traffic bridge 1,000,000 100,000 1,100,000 Civil Works 1,100,000 1,100,000 1.5.4 New concrete road from NR13 to proposed bridge 300,000 30,000 330,000 Civil Works 330,000 330,000

1.5.5New concrete bypass road from proposed bridge to connection to western loop road 1,164,187 116,419 1,280,606 Civil Works 1,280,606 1,280,606

1.5.6 Riverbank path and park reserve 300,000 30,000 330,000 Civil Works 330,000 330,000 1.5.7 Riverbank protection 300,000 30,000 330,000 Civil Works 330,000 330,000 1.5.8 Resettlement 122,516 122,516 Resettlement 122,516

Subtotal 6,920,361 679,785 7,600,146 7,477,630 122,516 7,477,630 -

1.6.1Works on main road – central reservation, planting, street lighting, footpath clearing 0.98km 256,898 25,690 282,588 Civil Works 282,588 282,588

1.6.2Loop road past hospital – upgraded footpaths, street lights, parking bays, 1.43km 288,143 28,814 316,957 Civil Works 316,957 316,957

1.6.3Cross roads (6) - Paved footpaths 2m wide (or to fit existing width) parking, street lighting 1.42km 186,142 18,614 204,756 Civil Works 204,756 204,756

1.6.4 Road surfacing and drain rehabilitation 250m 50,000 5,000 55,000 Civil Works 55,000 55,000 1.6.5 Road surfacing with new road drains 640m 100,000 10,000 110,000 Civil Works 110,000 110,000 1.6.6 Upgraded footpaths and side drains only, 420m 42,000 4,200 46,200 Civil Works 46,200 46,200 1.6.7 Resettlement - - Resettlement -

Subtotal 923,183 92,318 1,015,501 1,015,501 - 1,015,501 -

1.7.1 Access 0.8km road to site, concrete, 4m wide 200,000 20,000 220,000 Civil Works 220,000 220,000 1.7.2 Clear site 50,000 5,000 55,000 Civil Works 55,000 55,000 1.7.3 Develop 6 clay lined cells (earthworks) and gas recovery 2,000,000 200,000 2,200,000 Civil Works 2,200,000 2,200,000 1.7.4 Site roads 100,000 10,000 110,000 Civil Works 110,000 110,000 1.7.5 Site drains 200,000 20,000 220,000 Civil Works 220,000 220,000 1.7.6 Retire & compact existing waste into 1 cell 100,000 10,000 110,000 Civil Works 110,000 110,000 1.7.7 Leachate pond (lined) 200,000 20,000 220,000 Civil Works 220,000 220,000 1.7.8 Leachate recirculation system 200,000 20,000 220,000 Civil Works 220,000 220,000 1.7.9 Site office & toilet 200,000 20,000 220,000 Civil Works 220,000 220,000 1.7.10 Sorting & recycling area (concrete pad, roofed) 200,000 20,000 220,000 Civil Works 220,000 220,000 1.7.11 Site fence 120,000 12,000 132,000 Civil Works 132,000 132,000 1.7.12 Power supply 200,000 20,000 220,000 Civil Works 220,000 220,000 1.7.13 Water supply, monitoring boreholes 100,000 10,000 110,000 Civil Works 110,000 110,000 1.7.14 Hazardous waste area & incinerator 250,000 25,000 275,000 Civil Works 275,000 275,000 1.7.15 Septage treatment facility 1,000,000 100,000 1,100,000 Civil Works 1,100,000 1,100,000 1.7.9 3 collection vehicles: 300,000 30,000 330,000 Equipment 330,000 330,000 1.7.10 1 bulldozer: 150,000 15,000 165,000 Equipment 165,000 165,000 1.7.11 Septage vehicles 200,000 20,000 220,000 Equipment 220,000 220,000 1.7.12 Resettlement - - Resettlement - -

Subtotal 5,770,000 577,000 6,347,000 6,347,000 - 5,632,000 715,000

Summary Output 1:Champasak Province 6,570,481 657,048 7,227,529 7,227,529 - 7,227,529 - Vientiane Province 21,180,301 2,105,779 23,286,080 23,163,564 122,516 22,448,564 715,000 Total for Output 1 27,750,782 2,762,827 30,513,609 30,391,093 122,516 29,676,093 715,000

1.5: V3 Western Loop Rural Access Road and Bridge Improvements

1.6: V4 Vang Vieng Urban Renewal

1.7: V5 Vang Vieng Solid Waste Management Improvements



Goods Package

USD 10% USD


Resettlement USD USD USD USD No. ActivityResettlement

Excl. tax Incl. tax Excl. tax Incl. tax Excl. tax Excl. tax Incl. tax1.1: C1 Nakasang Access Road and Port Rehabilitation 3,284,697 3,613,167 - - 3,284,697 3,613,167 1.2: C2 Don Det-Don Khone Access Improvements 3,285,784 3,614,362 - - 3,285,784 3,614,362 TIIGP2-LAO-W01 6,570,481 7,227,529 - - - 6,570,481 7,227,529 1.3: V1 Nam Ngum Reservoir Access Improvements 5,584,260 6,142,686 - - 5,584,260 6,142,686 TIIGP2-LAO-W02 5,584,260 6,142,686 - - - 5,584,260 6,142,686 1.4: V2 Kaeng Yui Waterfall Access Improvements 1,982,497 2,180,747 - - 1,982,497 2,180,747 1.5: V3 Western Loop Rural Access Road and Bridge Improvements 6,797,845 7,477,630 - 122,516 6,920,361 7,600,146 1.6: V4 Vang Vieng Urban Renewal 923,183 1,015,501 - - 923,183 1,015,501 TIIGP2-LAO-W03 9,703,525 10,673,878 - - 122,516 9,826,041 10,796,394 1.7: V5 Vang Vieng Solid Waste Management Improvements 5,120,000 5,632,000 650,000 715,000 - 5,770,000 6,347,000 TIIGP2-LAO-W04 5,120,000 5,632,000 650,000 715,000 - 5,770,000 6,347,000 Total 26,978,266 29,676,093 650,000 715,000 122,516 27,750,782 30,513,609

TotalWorks Equipment

ALL AMOUNTS INCLUDING PREVAILING TAXES

Amount Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Total2.1 National ASEAN Tourism Standards

adaptation 30,000 60% 40% 100%

2.2 Establishment of certification bodies and processes

175,000 20% 40% 30% 10% 100%

2.3 Assessor training 165,000 70% 30% 100%2.4 ASEAN Tourism Standards promotion 65,000 70% 20% 10% 100%2.5 Implement ASEAN Tourism Standards

and the ASEAN Sustainable Tourism Awards

1,065,000 20% 30% 20% 20% 10% 100%

Total Output 2 1,500,000 3.5% 30.4% 29.0% 15.8% 14.2% 7.1% 100%

Output 2 ActivitiesImplementation %

COST ESTIMATE OF OUTPUT 2 (SUMMARY)

Total Services Equipment2.1 National ASEAN Tourism Standards adaptation 2.1.1 Translation2.1.1.1 Translate ASEAN Tourism Standards into national language 5,000 5,000 2.1.2 Adaptation2.1.2.1 Adapt ASEAN Tourism Standards to national context 10,000 10,000 2.1.2.2 Meetings with public and private stakeholders, and ASEAN

Secretariat and lead-countries as needed10,000 10,000

2.1.3 Approval2.1.3.1 Facilitate official approval of adapted standards 5,000 5,000 Subtotal 2.1 30,000 30,000 - 2.2 Establishment of certification bodies and processes2.2.1 Establishment of national and provincial certification bodies2.2.1.1 Organize meetings related to formation of national and provincial

certification bodies30,000 30,000

2.2.1.2 Procure equipment for certification bodies 30,000 30,000 2.2.2 Review, updating and preparation of national guidelines and

manuals for certification processes2.2.2.1 Organize meetings to review existing and develop approaches for

new guidelines and manuals and to develop and agree on sustainable financing mechanisms for ongoing assessment and certification

10,000 10,000

2.2.2.2 Prepare and facilitate approval of guidelines and manuals 15,000 15,000 2.2.2.3 Create paper-based and/or online assessment and reporting tools 15,000 15,000 2.2.2.4 Publish (in print and online) guidelines and manuals 15,000 15,000 2.2.3 Capacity building for certification bodies2.2.3.1 Design training program on certification processes for national and

provincial certification bodies10,000 10,000

2.2.3.2 Conduct training on certification processes for national and provincial certification bodies

50,000 50,000

Subtotal 2.2 175,000 145,000 30,000 2.3 Assessor training 2.3.1 Training program design2.3.1.1 Design comprehensive standard-specific training packages for: (i)

national master trainers; (ii) national and provincial trainers; and (iii) national and provincial assessors

30,000 30,000

2.3.2 Training program implementation2.3.2.1 Implement standard-specific training programs for national master

trainers25,000 25,000

2.3.2.2 Implement standard-specific training programs for national and provincial trainers, including master-trainer supervised on-site trial assessments

40,000 40,000

2.3.2.3 Implement standard-specific training programs for national and provincial assessors, including trainer supervised on-site trial assessments

70,000 70,000

Subtotal 2.3 165,000 165,000 - 2.4 ASEAN Tourism Standards promotion 2.4.1 Preparation of promotional materials2.4.1.1 Produce print and electronic promotional materials for selected

ASEAN Tourism Standards targeting public sector, private sector and communities

20,000 20,000

2.4.2 Promotional activities2.4.2.1 Conduct promotional activities targeting national and/or provincial

authorities, tourism business associations and other service provider networks

30,000 30,000

2.4.3 Establishment of an online resource center2.4.3.1 Establish an ASEAN Tourism Standards website containing general

information about the standards, promotional materials, downloadable versions of the adapted standards and detailed, step-by-step instructions about how to apply for certification, in Lao and English

15,000 15,000

Subtotal 2.4 65,000 65,000 -

Activity

COST ESTIMATE OF OUTPUT 2 (SUMMARY)ALL AMOUNTS INCLUDING PREVAILING TAXES

Total Services EquipmentActivity2.5 Implement ASEAN Tourism Standards and the ASEAN Sustainable Tourism Awards2.5.1 Preparation of detailed implementation plans2.5.1.1 Support DMNs and other relevant authorities to jointly prepare

implementation plans for ASEAN Tourism standards, identifying for each activity required public and private sector investment (ASEAN Clean City Standard and ASEAN Public Toilet Standard)

30,000 30,000

2.5.2 Implementation support2.5.2.1 Support to relevant government departments to implement actions

identified in the plans requiring public sector investment, including assessing service providers

500,000 500,000

2.5.2.2 Equipment for actions identified in the plans requiring public sector investment

500,000 500,000

2.5.2.3 Support the running of the biennial ASEAN Sustainable Tourism Awards

35,000 35,000

Subtotal 2.5 1,065,000 565,000 500,000 Total Output 2 1,500,000 970,000 530,000

ALL AMOUNTS INCLUDING PREVAILING TAXESTotal Lao PDR Southern

Laos/ Champasak

Province

Luang Prabang Province

Vientiane Province

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Total

Capacity building for tourism destination management3.1 Destination management

network institutional strengthening

250,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 35% 30% 20% 5% 5% 5% 100%

3.2 Destination management plan preparation

50,000 14,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 50% 50% 100%

3.3 Policy, Regulation and Master Planning Support

485,000 90,000 105,000 135,000 155,000 10% 30% 40% 20% 100%

3.4 Destination Marketing and Promotion Support

700,000 280,000 115,000 175,000 130,000 10% 20% 40% 20% 10% 100%

3.5 Heritage Interpretation Support 550,000 - 95,000 305,000 150,000 30% 40% 20% 10% 100%3.6 Tourism-related SME

development665,000 - 200,000 265,000 200,000 20% 30% 30% 10% 10% 100%

3.7 Establish and maintain internet-based tourism knowledge repositories

40,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 30% 20% 20% 20% 10% 100%

Capacity building for infrastructure O&M3.8 Develop infrastructure O&M

plans with sustainable finance mechanisms

85,000 10,000 25,000 10,000 40,000 40% 60% 100%

3.9 Facilitate Public-Private Partnerships for operations and maintenance

30,000 - 10,000 - 20,000 30% 60% 10% 100%

3.10 Infrastructure O&M training 145,000 - 20,000 - 125,000 60% 40% 100%Total Output 3 3,000,000 504,000 642,000 962,000 892,000 5.4% 20.9% 27.1% 25.0% 14.6% 7.1% 100%

Output 3 ActivitiesImplementation %

COST ESTIMATE OF OUTPUT 3 (SUMMARY)

Services EquipmentLao PDR Southern

LaosProvincial 4,000

IslandsProvincial Luang

Prabang Town and Environs

Pak Ou Provincial Nam Ngum Reservoir

Vang Vieng

Town and Environs

3.1 Destination management network institutional strengthening3.1.1 Establishment of DMNs3.1.1.1 Organize meetings with public and private sector stakeholders to

form (or reinvigorate existing) destination management networks (DMNs), establish taskforces and DMN secretariats as needed

85,000 25,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 25,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 85,000

3.1.1.2 Procure equipment for DMN secretariats 20,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 20,000 3.1.2 Capacity building of DMN members - 3.1.2.1 Conduct training for DMN members on destination management

international good practice40,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000

3.1.2.2 Facilitate foreign language training for public sector DMN members 65,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 65,000 3.1.2.3 Support public sector DMN members to pursue post-graduate

degrees in destination management related subjects40,000 40,000 - - - 40,000 40,000

Subtotal 3.1 250,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 50,000 - - 50,000 - - 50,000 - - 230,000 20,000 3.2 Destination management plan preparation3.2.1 Review and updating of existing and prepare new DMPs3.2.1.1 Through the DMN mechanism and in consultation with other

stakeholders, draft new/updated DMPs, including actions plans, identification of roles and responsibilities of public and private sectors and resource requirements and sources, and translate and disseminate DMPs to all members and online

50,000 14,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 14,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 50,000

Subtotal 3.2 50,000 14,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 14,000 12,000 - - 12,000 - - 12,000 - - 50,000 - 3.3 Policy, Regulation and Master Planning Support3.3.1 Policy intervention3.3.1.1 Support DMN policy task force meetings and research to identify

policy issues affecting the tourism industry and the preparation of proposals to relevant authorities for policy change

60,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 60,000

3.3.2 Industry standards and regulations3.3.2.1 Through the DMN mechanisms, and where appropriate in alignment

and with technical support from international tourism standards and certification systems (e.g. Global Sustainable Tourism Council, Travelife, Earthcheck), identify, draft, review, finalize, translate, print and distribute national tourism industry standards (for specific types of tourism activities and services not covered by the ASEAN Tourism Standards)

40,000 40,000 - - - 40,000 40,000

3.3.2.2 Through the DMN mechanisms, draft, review, finalize, translate, print and disseminate national and provincial tourism industry regulations for specific tourism activities and services in line with ASEAN and national tourism standards (such as Vang Vieng ballooning, ziplining etc.)

95,000 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 95,000

3.3.3 Master planning3.3.3.1 Through the DMN mechanisms, review existing tourism master

plans, prepare updated/new, approve, translate, print and disseminate tourism master plans for selected destinations (4,000 Islands, Luang Prabang Town and Environs, Nam Ngum 1 Reservoir Recreational Area, Vang Vieng Town and Environs)

290,000 - 70,000 100,000 120,000 70,000 100,000 50,000 70,000 290,000

Subtotal 3.3 485,000 90,000 105,000 135,000 155,000 90,000 15,000 20,000 70,000 35,000 100,000 - 35,000 50,000 70,000 485,000 - 3.4 Destination Marketing and Promotion Support3.4.1 Market research3.4.1.1 Through the DMN structure, conduct destination-specific market

research and analysis, including collection and analysis of destination-specific tourism statistical data, and disseminate results to DMN members and other industry stakeholders

105,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 25,000 105,000

3.4.2 Branding and promotion3.4.2.1 Through the DMN structure, create/update destination banding 50,000 20,000 - 15,000 15,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 50,000 3.4.2.2 Through the DMN structure, conduct promotion campaigns using

print and on-line media (websites, social media) and familiarization programs for tour operators and the media

170,000 70,000 30,000 40,000 30,000 70,000 30,000 40,000 30,000 170,000

3.4.3 Tourism forums and trade events3.4.3.1 Facilitate participation of project supported destinations (through the

DMN mechanism) in relevant tourism forums and trade events120,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 120,000

3.4.3.2 Through the DMN mechanism, organize and host tourism forums and trade events in the target destinations

195,000 75,000 30,000 60,000 30,000 75,000 30,000 60,000 30,000 195,000

3.4.4 Training

COST ESTIMATE OF OUTPUT 3 (DETAILS)ALL AMOUNTS INCLUDING PREVAILING TAXES

Activity Total Activity Coordinator / Fund Manager

Vientiane Province

PCU PIU National Sub-national

Provincial and SiteChampa-

sakLuang

PrabangChampasak Luang Prabang Vientiane Province

Target Destination/Site






Vang Vieng

Town and Environs


Vientiane Province



sakLuang



3.4.4.1 Organize training for MICT and Champasak, Luang Prabang and Vientiane Province DICT staff on the collection, analysis, presentation and dissemination of tourism statistical data for destinations

30,000 30,000 - - - 30,000 30,000

3.4.4.2 Organize training for MICT and Champasak, Luang Prabang and Vientiane Province DICT marketing staff on the production of print and electronic promotional materials, including on the implementation of ASEAN guidelines for promotional materials, and the use of social media for tourism promotion

30,000 30,000 - - - 30,000 30,000

Subtotal 3.4 700,000 280,000 115,000 175,000 130,000 280,000 115,000 - - 175,000 - - 130,000 - - 700,000 - 3.5 Heritage Interpretation Support3.5.1 Heritage interpretation planning3.5.1.1 Prepare focused destination cultural and/or natural heritage

interpretation plans, including opportunities for public-private partnerships for the delivery of interpretation programs, for the 4,000 Islands, Luang Prabang Town and Environs, Nam Ngum 1 Reservoir Recreational Area and Vang Vieng Town and Environs

80,000 - 15,000 40,000 25,000 15,000 25,000 15,000 10,000 15,000 80,000

3.5.2 Implementation of heritage interpretation programs3.5.2.1 Implement interpretation activities identified in the heritage

interpretation plans (e.g. heritage trails, directional signage, interpretation panels, guidebooks, maps, mobile applications), including content development, graphic design and layout, printing, online publication etc.

290,000 - 50,000 160,000 80,000 50,000 120,000 40,000 30,000 50,000 290,000

3.5.2.2 Procure and install equipment for interpretation 180,000 - 30,000 105,000 45,000 30,000 90,000 15,000 15,000 30,000 180,000 Subtotal 3.5 550,000 - 95,000 305,000 150,000 - - - 95,000 - 235,000 70,000 - 55,000 95,000 370,000 180,000 3.6 Tourism-related SME development3.6.1 Support SMEs to implement DMP actions3.6.1.1 Support DMN-endorsed SME development activities identified in

DMPs, including: (i) business planning, management and marketing training; (ii) hospitality services training; (iii) support for product diversification, quality and safety enhancement; and (iv) support for public-private tourism marketing and business networking.

340,000 - 100,000 140,000 100,000 100,000 140,000 100,000 340,000

3.6.1.2 Support DMN-endorsed SME development activities identified in DMPs, including: equipment to improve hospitality services and product quality and safety

325,000 - 100,000 125,000 100,000 100,000 125,000 100,000 325,000

Subtotal 3.6 665,000 - 200,000 265,000 200,000 - - 200,000 - 265,000 - - 200,000 - - 340,000 325,000 3.7 Establish and maintain internet-based tourism knowledge

repositories3.7.1 Establish and maintain internet-based DMN tourism knowledge

repositories3.7.1.1 Through the DMN structure, establish and regularly update website

for the publication of information relevant to DMN members and other tourism stakeholders

40,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000

Subtotal 3.7 40,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 - - 10,000 - - 10,000 - - 40,000 - 3.8 Develop infrastructure O&M plans with sustainable finance

mechanisms3.8.1 Preparation of O&M Plans

3.8.1.1

With support from Infrastructure O&M and PPP consultants, and through consultation with relevant stakeholders, prepare operation and maintenance (O&M) plans for all infrastructure included in Output 1 subprojects

45,000 - 15,000 - 30,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 45,000

Subtotal 3.8 85,000 10,000 25,000 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 - 15,000 10,000 - - 10,000 15,000 15,000 85,000 - 3.9 Facilitate Public-Private Partnerships for operations and

maintenance 3.9.1 Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Facilitation

3.9.1.1 Preparation of feasibility studies for private operation of public tourist facilities and ancillary services

15,000 - 5,000 - 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000

3.9.1.2 Procurement of PPP contracts (tendering and contracting) 15,000 - 5,000 - 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 Subtotal 3.9 30,000 - 10,000 - 20,000 - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 10,000 30,000 - 3.10 Infrastructure O&M training 3.10.1 Solid waste management (Vang Vieng Landfill)






Vang Vieng

Town and Environs


Vientiane Province



sakLuang



3.10.1.1 Practical training on general managed landfill and sanitary landfill features and lifetime operation, incl. (i) landfill gate control and cell management; (ii) leachate collection & confinement; (iii) medical waste – handling & disposal; (iv) on-site sorting & recycling; and (v) gas collection, gas safety & flaring..

10,000 - - - 10,000 10,000 10,000

3.10.1.2 Site visit to successful sanitary/managed landfill and septage treatment facility in Southeast Asia (e.g. Bangkok or Singapore) for key operator staff and heads of UDAA and DPWT

15,000 - - - 15,000 15,000 15,000

3.10.1.3 6-monthly refresher and follow up courses for first 3 years of operation

20,000 - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000

3.10.1.4 Support UDAA and DWPT staff to pursue post-graduate degree in solid waste management

50,000 - - - 50,000 50,000 50,000

3.10.1.5 Training in O&M of septage treatment facility, incl. features, lifetime operation, daily operator training, and environmental monitoring (incl. water quality).

10,000 - - - 10,000 10,000 10,000

3.10.2 Port management (Nakasang and Nam Ngum Dam)3.10.2.1 Port management training, including setting up management

structure, and (i) ticketing and book keeping; (ii) maritime safety and first aid training; (iii) daily and weekly cleaning routines; (iv) grounds maintenance; (v) boat safety standards and safety auditing.

40,000 - 20,000 - 20,000 20,000 20,000 40,000

Subtotal 3.10 145,000 - 20,000 - 125,000 - - - 20,000 - - - - - 125,000 145,000 - Total Output 3 3,000,000 504,000 642,000 962,000 892,000 504,000 212,000 220,000 210,000 557,000 335,000 70,000 447,000 130,000 315,000 2,475,000 525,000

Output 3 components:(i) Capacity building for tourism destination management 2,740,000 494,000 587,000 952,000 707,000 (ii) Capacity building for infrastructure O&M 260,000 10,000 55,000 10,000 185,000 Total Output 3 3,000,000 504,000 642,000 962,000 892,000

CB 2,475,000 499,000 507,000 727,000 742,000 Eq 525,000 5,000 135,000 235,000 150,000

Total 3,000,000 504,000 642,000 962,000 892,000

ADB Grant Government4.1 Consultancy Services

Project Management and Civil Engineering Support (Firm) 2,461,080 2,461,080 - Provisional sums for surveys and CAD support 500,000 500,000 -

Capacity Building Support (Individual consultants) 1,446,422 1,446,422 - Subtotal (4.1) 4,407,502 4,407,502 -

4.2 Safeguards and Social Dimensions ImplementationEnvironmental management plan Champasak Province 29,000 29,000 - Environmental management plan Vientiane Province 86,000 86,000 - Indigenous Peoples Action Plan Vientiane Province 56,700 56,700 - RP Management and Implementation 38,178 38,178 - Gender Action Plan 100,000 100,000 - Consultation and Participation Plan 100,000 100,000 - Subtotal (4.2) 409,878 409,878 -

4.3 Project planning, monitoring, evaluation, reporting and communicationBiannual Project Review and Planning Meetings 260,000 260,000 - Baseline, mid-term and end-of-project performance data collection 40,000 40,000 - Stakeholder Communication Strategy 15,000 15,000 - Financial management and procurement training 20,000 20,000 - External Audit 60,000 60,000 - Subtotal (4.3) 395,000 395,000 -

4.4 PCU and PIU SupportPCU and PIU Staff cost 1,519,200 547,200 972,000 36.0%PCU and PIU Operations 1,969,200 1,393,200 576,000 70.7%PCU and PIU Equipment 315,000 315,000 - 100.0%Subtotal (4.4) 3,803,400 2,255,400 1,548,000 Total Project Management Activities 9,015,780 7,467,780 1,548,000

FinancierProject Management Activities Amount

COST ESTIMATE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ALL AMOUNTS INCLUDING PREVAILING TAXES

Project Management and Civil Engineering Support (Firm)

Budget1 Competitive Component Amount2 Remuneration key experts 1,815,455 Excl. of income tax3 Reimbursable expenses 421,891 Excl. of VAT4 Subtotal (A) 2,237,346 5 Non-Competitive Component6 Provisional sums 454,545 Excl. of VAT7 Contingencies 134,595 5.00% of Subtotal A + Provisional sums (excl. of VAT)8 Subtotal (B) 589,140 9 Estimated Budget before Tax (C) = (A) + (B) 2,826,486 for Procurement Plan, CSRN, and RFP

10 Indirect Local Tax11 Income tax experts 181,545 12 VAT 101,103 13 Total Indirect Local Tax (D) 282,649 14 Estimated Contract Budget after Tax (E) = (C) + (D) 3,109,134 15 Budget Contingencies (Uncommitted Balance) (F) 77,728 2.50%16 Total Budget for the Consulting Services (G) = (E) + (F) 3,186,863

Breakdown Of Reimbursable Expenses, Provisional Sums and Contingency1 Reimbursable Expenses Amount Excl. of VAT2 Per diem allowances 307,200 3 International Airfares 29,545 4 Domestic travel5 Domestic Airfares 56,364 6 Land Transport, Vehicle Hire (Local Transport) 16,909 7 Misc. Travel Expenses 5,691 8 Communication 3,018 9 Reproduction of reports 3,164

10 Subtotal Reimbursable Expenses 421,891 11 Provisional Sums12 Provisional sum for technical surveys for detailed design 340,909 13 Provisional sum for CAD support for detailed engineering design and bidding documents 113,636 14 Subtotal Provisional Sums 454,545 15 Contingency 134,595 5%

Individual consultants

International Tourism Specialist / Co-Team Leader1 Remuneration Amount Exclusive of any prevailing local income taxes2 Field 638,182 3 Home - 4 Subtotal (A) 638,182 5 Out-of-Pocket Expenses Exclusive of VAT6 Per diem 73,636 7 Air travel 32,045 8 Misc. Travel Expenses (Lump sum) 2,018 9 Land Transport, Vehicle Hire (Local Transport) - Provided by EA

10 Communications and Reports 640 11 Subtotal (B) 108,340 12 Contingency (C.) 37,326 5.00% of A+B13 Estimated Budget before Tax (C) = (A) + (B) 783,848 for Procurement Plan and CSRN14 Indirect Local Tax15 Income tax (on subtotal A) 63,818 16 VAT (on subtotal B+C) 14,567 17 Total Indirect Local Tax (D) 78,385 18 Estimated Contract Budget after Tax (E) = (C) + (D) 862,233 19 Budget Contingencies (Uncommitted Balance) (F) 21,556 2.50%20 Total Budget for the Consulting Services (G) = (E) + (F) 883,789

International Tourism Standards Specialist1 Remuneration Amount Exclusive of any prevailing local income taxes2 Field 64,000 3 Home 16,000 4 Subtotal (A) 80,000 5 Out-of-Pocket Expenses Exclusive of VAT6 Per diem 8,727 7 Air travel 6,818 8 Misc. Travel Expenses (Lump sum) 364 9 Land Transport, Vehicle Hire (Local Transport) - Provided by EA


National Tourism Specialist / Deputy Team Leader1 Remuneration Amount Exclusive of any prevailing local income taxes2 Field 60,136 3 Home 111,682 4 Subtotal (A) 171,818 5 Out-of-Pocket Expenses Exclusive of VAT6 Per diem 25,773 7 Air travel 8,636 8 Misc. Travel Expenses (Lump sum) 691 9 Land Transport, Vehicle Hire (Local Transport) - Provided by EA


International Gender Specialist1 Remuneration Amount Exclusive of any prevailing local income taxes2 Field 26,182 3 Home 6,545 4 Subtotal (A) 32,727 5 Out-of-Pocket Expenses Exclusive of VAT6 Per diem 3,273 7 Air travel 5,364 8 Misc. Travel Expenses (Lump sum) 247 9 Land Transport, Vehicle Hire (Local Transport) - Provided by EA


National Gender Specialist1 Remuneration Amount Exclusive of any prevailing local income taxes2 Field 11,455 3 Home 21,273 4 Subtotal (A) 32,727 5 Out-of-Pocket Expenses Exclusive of VAT6 Per diem 5,727 7 Air travel 1,818 8 Misc. Travel Expenses (Lump sum) 145 9 Land Transport, Vehicle Hire (Local Transport) - Provided by EA

10 Communications and Reports 200 11 Subtotal (B) 7,891 12 Contingency (C.) 2,031 5.00% of A+B13 Estimated Budget before Tax (C) = (A) + (B) 42,649 for Procurement Plan and CSRN14 Indirect Local Tax15 Income tax (on subtotal A) 3,273 16 VAT (on subtotal B+C) 992 17 Total Indirect Local Tax (D) 4,265 18 Estimated Contract Budget after Tax (E) = (C) + (D) 46,914 19 Budget Contingencies (Uncommitted Balance) (F) 1,173 2.50%20 Total Budget for the Consulting Services (G) = (E) + (F) 48,087

International Financial Management & Procurement Specialist1 Remuneration Amount Exclusive of any prevailing local income taxes2 Field 40,000 3 Home 10,000 4 Subtotal (A) 50,000 5 Out-of-Pocket Expenses Exclusive of VAT6 Per diem 5,455 7 Air travel 5,909 8 Misc. Travel Expenses (Lump sum) 291 9 Land Transport, Vehicle Hire (Local Transport) - Provided by EA

10 Communications and Reports 136 11 Subtotal (B) 11,791 12 Contingency (C.) 3,090 5.00% of A+B13 Estimated Budget before Tax (C) = (A) + (B) 64,880 for Procurement Plan and CSRN14 Indirect Local Tax

15 Income tax (on subtotal A) 5,000 16 VAT (on subtotal B+C) 1,488 17 Total Indirect Local Tax (D) 6,488 18 Estimated Contract Budget after Tax (E) = (C) + (D) 71,369 19 Budget Contingencies (Uncommitted Balance) (F) 1,784 2.50%20 Total Budget for the Consulting Services (G) = (E) + (F) 73,153

National Financial Management & Procurement Specialist1 Remuneration Amount Exclusive of any prevailing local income taxes2 Field 5,727 3 Home 10,636 4 Subtotal (A) 16,364 5 Out-of-Pocket Expenses Exclusive of VAT6 Per diem 2,864 7 Air travel 909 8 Misc. Travel Expenses (Lump sum) 73 9 Land Transport, Vehicle Hire (Local Transport) - Provided by EA

10 Communications and Reports 145 11 Subtotal (B) 3,991 12 Contingency (C.) 1,018 5.00% of A+B13 Estimated Budget before Tax (C) = (A) + (B) 21,372 for Procurement Plan and CSRN14 Indirect Local Tax15 Income tax (on subtotal A) 1,636 16 VAT (on subtotal B+C) 501 17 Total Indirect Local Tax (D) 2,137 18 Estimated Contract Budget after Tax (E) = (C) + (D) 23,510 19 Budget Contingencies (Uncommitted Balance) (F) 588 2.50%20 Total Budget for the Consulting Services (G) = (E) + (F) 24,097

International Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist1 Remuneration Amount Exclusive of any prevailing local income taxes2 Field 26,727 3 Home 11,455 4 Subtotal (A) 38,182 5 Out-of-Pocket Expenses Exclusive of VAT6 Per diem 4,582 7 Air travel 2,955 8 Misc. Travel Expenses (Lump sum) 145 9 Land Transport, Vehicle Hire (Local Transport) - Provided by EA


National Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist1 Remuneration Amount Exclusive of any prevailing local income taxes2 Field 19,091 3 Home 19,091 4 Subtotal (A) 38,182 5 Out-of-Pocket Expenses Exclusive of VAT6 Per diem 13,091 7 Air travel 2,727 8 Misc. Travel Expenses (Lump sum) 218 9 Land Transport, Vehicle Hire (Local Transport) - Provided by EA


ALL AMOUNTS INCLUDING PREVAILING TAXESProject Management Activities - Recurrent Costs

Total Per Diem

No. of flights (RT) Airfare ($)

Total Flight ($) Recurrent Equipment ADB Grant Government

Project Director - Government 1 72 1,500 108,000 108,000 108,000 Project Manager - Government 1 72 1,500 108,000 108,000 108,000 Financial Controller (Finance & Procurement Supervision) - Government 1 72 1,500 108,000 108,000 108,000 Chief Accountant - Externally Hired 1 72 1,600 115,200 35 60 2,100 20 280 5,600 115,200 115,200 Office Manager (Safeguards and Monitoring Coordination) - Externally Hired 1 72 1,100 79,200 35 60 2,100 20 280 5,600 79,200 79,200 Office Assistant - Externally Hired 1 72 900 64,800 35 60 2,100 10 280 2,800 64,800 64,800 Tourism Team

Training and Standards Specialist - Government 1 72 1,500 108,000 108,000 108,000 Marketing Specialist - Government 1 72 1,500 108,000 108,000 108,000

Total 8 576 799,200 180 6,300 50 14,000 799,200 - 259,200 540,000

B PIU StaffNumber of Staff

Person Months

Rate/ Month ($)

Total Staff Fees Recurrent Equipment ADB Grant Government

PIU Supervisor - Government 4 72 150 43,200 43,200 43,200 PIU Director - Government 4 72 150 43,200 43,200 43,200 PIU Manager - Government 4 72 150 43,200 43,200 43,200 Finance Officer - Government 4 72 150 43,200 43,200 43,200 Accountant - Externally Hired 4 72 500 144,000 144,000 144,000 Secretary - Externally Hired 4 72 500 144,000 144,000 144,000 Tourism Team

Tourism Coordinator - Government 3 72 150 32,400 32,400 32,400 Tourism Training and Standards Coordinator - Government 3 72 150 32,400 32,400 32,400 Destination Management Coordinator - Government 3 72 150 32,400 32,400 32,400 Marketing and Product Development Specialist - Government 3 72 150 32,400 32,400 32,400

Infrastructure team Civil Works Coordinator - Government 3 72 150 32,400 32,400 32,400 Engineer - Government 3 72 150 32,400 32,400 32,400 Surveyor - Government 3 72 150 32,400 32,400 32,400 Safeguards Specialist - Government 3 72 150 32,400 32,400 32,400

Total 48 1,008 720,000 - - - - - 720,000 - 288,000 432,000

C PCU Support Qty MonthsUnit Rate or

Month ($) Total Recurrent Equipment ADB Grant GovernmentPCU Running CostsPCU Office Rental - Government 1 72 4,000 288,000 288,000 288,000 PCU Office Operating Cost (utilities, communication, maintenance, cleaning etc.) 1 72 2,000 144,000 144,000 144,000 PCU International Travel (airfares and perdiem) LS 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 PCU Project Vehicle Operating Cost (fuel, maintenance) 1 72 750 54,000 54,000 54,000 PCU Office Supplies LS 72 500 36,000 36,000 36,000 PCU Contribtution to MTCO 6 20,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 PCU EquipmentPCU Project Vehicle (Toyota Fortuner 2.8 4x4 (6AT) pr equivalent) 1 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 PCU Office Equipment (furniture, IT equipment) LS 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Total 777,000 702,000 75,000 489,000 288,000

D PIU Support Qty MonthsUnit Rate or

Month ($) Total Recurrent Equipment ADB Grant GovernmentPIU Running CostsPIU Office Rental - Government 4 72 1,000 288,000 288,000 288,000 PIU Office Operating Cost (utilities, communication, maintenance, cleaning etc.) 4 72 2,000 576,000 576,000 576,000 PIU Project Vehicle Operating Cost (fuel, maintenance) 4 72 1,000 288,000 288,000 288,000 PIU Office Supplies 4 72 400 115,200 115,200 115,200 PIU EquipmentPIU Project Vehicle (Toyota Hilux Revo Double Cab 2.4E 4x4 (6MT) or equivalent) 4 40,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 PIU Office Equipment (furniture, IT equipment) 4 20,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Total 1,507,200 1,267,200 240,000 1,219,200 288,000

Summary Recurrent Equipment ADB Grant GovernmentTotal PCU and PIU Staff Costs 1,519,200 - 180 6,300 50 - 14,000 1,519,200 - 547,200 972,000 Total PCU and PIU Running Costs 1,969,200 - - - - - - 1,969,200 - 1,393,200 576,000 Total PCU Equipment 315,000 - - - - - - - 315,000 315,000 - Grand Total PCU and PIU Costs 3,803,400 20,530 3,508,930 3,823,750 3,817,450 6,072,800 7,620,800 3,488,400 315,000 2,255,400 1,548,000

Total Staff Fees

Daily Per Diem ($)

Number of DaysA PCU Staff

Number of Staff

Person Months

Rate/ Month ($)

Domestic Flights Category Financier

ALL AMOUNTS INCLUDING PREVAILING TAXESNo. Project Management Activities - Others Unit Quantity Unit Rate

(USD) Total (USD)

Environmental safeguards (excl. consulting services)1 Environmental management plan Champasak Province LS 1 29,000 29,000

2 Environmental management plan Vientiane Province LS 1 86,000 86,000

3 RP Management and Implementation LS 1 38,178 38,178 Refer to RAP; 15% to 20% of basic LAR costs

Gender and social dimension (excl. consulting services)4 Indigenous Peoples Action Plan Vientiane Province LS 1 56,700 56,700

5 Gender Action Plan LS 1 100,000 100,000

6 Consultation and Participation Plan LS 1 100,000 100,000

Project planning, monitoring, evaluation, reporting and communication7 Biannual Project Review and Planning Meetings Meeting 13 20,000 260,000

8 Baseline, mid-term and end-of-project performance data collection

LS 1 40,000 40,000

9 Stakeholder Communication Strategy LS 1 15,000 15,000

10 Financial management and procurement training LS 1 20,000 20,000

11 External Audit Year 6 10,000 60,000

Total 804,878

ALL AMOUNTS INCLUDING PREVAILING TAXESNo. Project Management Activities - Others Unit Quantity Unit Rate

(USD) Total (USD)

Environmental safeguards (excl. consulting services)1 Environmental management plan Champasak Province LS 1 29,000 29,000

2 Environmental management plan Vientiane Province LS 1 86,000 86,000

3 RP Management and Implementation LS 1 38,178 38,178 Refer to RAP; 15% to 20% of basic LAR costs

Gender and social dimension (excl. consulting services)4 Indigenous Peoples Action Plan Vientiane Province LS 1 56,700 56,700

5 Gender Action Plan LS 1 100,000 100,000

6 Consultation and Participation Plan LS 1 100,000 100,000

Project planning, monitoring, evaluation, reporting and communication7 Biannual Project Review and Planning Meetings Meeting 13 20,000 260,000

8 Baseline, mid-term and end-of-project performance data collection

LS 1 40,000 40,000

9 Stakeholder Communication Strategy LS 1 15,000 15,000

10 Financial management and procurement training LS 1 20,000 20,000

11 External Audit Year 6 10,000 60,000

Total 804,878

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Annual Cumulative Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Annual Cumulative Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Annual Cumulative2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 1.40 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.832019 0.00 1.60 0.00 1.05 2.65 4.05 1.20 3.14 0.87 0.83 6.03 8.04 0.56 0.58 0.99 1.06 3.18 4.012020 1.30 3.15 1.30 1.70 7.45 11.50 8.40 6.77 0.38 0.81 16.36 24.39 1.34 3.16 1.34 1.74 7.59 11.602021 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35 17.39 28.89 7.16 0.33 12.20 0.33 20.03 44.42 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35 17.39 28.982022 4.20 3.50 3.50 3.50 14.70 43.59 1.05 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.81 46.24 4.21 3.50 3.50 3.50 14.71 43.702023 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 2.40 45.99 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.55 46.79 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 2.55 46.252024 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.60 46.59 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.21 47.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.76 47.002025 0.30 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.41 47.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.00

Total Disbursements 47.00 Total Contract Awards 47.00 Total Expenditure 47.00

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.002019 0.00 1.60 0.00 1.05 2.65 1.20 3.14 0.87 0.83 6.032020 1.30 3.15 1.30 1.70 7.45 8.40 6.77 0.38 0.81 16.362021 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.35 17.39 7.16 0.33 12.20 0.33 20.032022 4.20 3.50 3.50 3.50 14.70 1.05 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.812023 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 2.40 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.552024 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.60 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.212025 0.30 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

47.00 47.00

CONTRACT AWARDS AND DISBURSEMENT BY QUARTER

Total Disbursements Total Contract Awards

Disbursements ($million) Contract awards ($million) Expenditure

Disbursements ($million) Contract awards ($million)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Annual Disbursement 1.40 2.65 7.45 17.39 14.70 2.40 0.60 0.41Cumulative Disbursement 1.40 4.05 11.50 28.89 43.59 45.99 46.59 47.00Annual Contracting 2.00 6.03 16.36 20.03 1.81 0.55 0.21 0.00Cumulative Contracting 2.00 8.04 24.39 44.42 46.24 46.79 47.00 47.00

0.005.00

10.0015.0020.0025.0030.0035.0040.0045.0050.00

Amou

nt ($

Milli

on)

Financing Charges Calculations

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalADB 0.65 2.80 6.94 15.97 13.51 2.32 0.71 42.9 6 Govt 0.06 0.26 0.33 0.33 0.26 0.26 0.16 1.7 Total 0.71 3.06 7.27 16.31 13.78 2.58 0.87 44.6

0.71 3.06 7.27 16.31 13.78 2.58 0.87 44.6 0.71 3.06 7.27 16.31 13.78 2.58 0.87

Financier: ADBCurrency: US$

Unit: Thousands

Financing terms Interest rateContractual

SpreadMaturity premium

Grace period (years)

Finance from loan (Y/N)

Interest during implementation 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 NCommitment fee 0.00% NFront end fee 0.00% N

Financing charges calculations

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalLoan balance - Opening balance 0.00 0.65 3.45 10.39 26.37 39.88 42.21 42.21 - Drawdown 0.65 2.80 6.94 15.97 13.51 2.32 0.71 42.92 - Closing balance 0.65 3.45 10.39 26.37 39.88 42.21 42.92 - Average balance 0.32 2.05 6.92 18.38 33.12 41.04 42.56Interest rate during implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Interest During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Commitment charge 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Front end fees 0.00 0.00Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Value using CPP exchange rates (VND millions)Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Interest During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Commitment charge 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Front end fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Value using constant exchange rates (VND millions)Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Interest During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Commitment charge 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Front end fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Financier: Central GovernmentCurrency: US$

Unit: Thousands






Project Implementation Period


2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalLoan balance - Opening balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23,260 - Drawdown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Closing balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Average balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Interest rate during implementation 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Interest During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Commitment charge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Front end fees 0 0Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Value using CPP exchange rates (MK millions)Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Interest During Implementation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Commitment charge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Front end fees 0 0

Value using constant exchange rates (MK millions)Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Interest During Implementation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Commitment charge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Front end fees 0 0

Financier 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalADB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Central Government 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Central Govt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Financier 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalADB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Central Government 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Central Govt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

10.6 114.4 327.0 542.5 685.9 740.2 749.1 3169.539.8 46.7 126.3 230.6 314.6 341.7 347.6 1447.450.4 161.1 453.3 773.1 1000.5 1081.9 1096.6 4616.8

Summary of Financing Charges by Financier ($ million)

Project Implementation Period

Summary of Financing Charges by Financier (VND millions)

Financing Charges Calculations by Output

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total

Output 1 Asian Development Bank - - 3.5 12.3 10.4 1.4 - 27.6 Output 2 Asian Development Bank 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 - 1.4 Output 3 Asian Development Bank 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 - 2.7 Output 4 Asian Development Bank 0.5 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.3 0.5 0.4 6.8 Output 5 Asian Development Bank - - - - - - - - Total 0.6 2.6 6.3 14.3 12.2 2.1 0.4 38.5 5.60

Financier: ADBCurrency: US$

Unit: Thousands







2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalLoan balance - Opening balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.51 15.83 26.27 27.63 - Drawdown 0.00 0.00 3.51 12.33 10.43 1.36 27.63 - Closing balance 0.00 0.00 3.51 15.83 26.27 27.63 - Average balance 0.00 0.00 1.75 9.67 21.05 26.95Interest rate during implementation 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Interest During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Commitement charge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Front end fees 0 0Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDI for Component 1

Value using CPP exchange rates (CNY millions)Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Interest During Implementation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Commitement charge 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Front end fees 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Value using constant exchange rates (CNY millions)Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Interest During Implementation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Commitement charge 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Front end fees 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Project Implementation Period (Component 1)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalLoan balance - Opening balance 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 - Drawdown 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - Closing balance 0 1 1 1 1 1 - Average balance 0 0 1 1 1 1Interest rate during implementation 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Interest During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Commitement charge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Front end fees 0 0Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDI by component 2



2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalLoan balance - Opening balance 0 0 1 2 2 3 3 - Drawdown 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 - Closing balance 0 1 2 2 3 3 - Average balance 0 0 1 2 2 3Interest rate during implementation 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Interest During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Commitement charge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Front end fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDI by component 3













Financier 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalOutput 1 Asian Development Bank 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Output 2 Asian Development Bank 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Output 3 Asian Development Bank 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Output 4 Asian Development Bank 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Output 5 Asian Development Bank 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Financier 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalOutput 1 Asian Development Bank 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Output 2 Asian Development Bank 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Output 3 Asian Development Bank 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Output 4 Asian Development Bank 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Output 5 Asian Development Bank 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Summary of Financing Charges by Component (foreign currency 000s)

Summary of Financing Charges by Component (VND millions)

Financing Charges Calculations by Subproject

ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total

Subproject 1 - - 1.0 2.3 - - - 3.3 Subproject 2 - - 1.0 2.3 - - - 3.3 Subproject 3 - - - 1.7 3.9 - - 5.6 Subproject 4 - - - 1.0 1.0 - - 2.0 Subproject 5 - - - 2.0 3.4 1.4 - 6.8 Subproject 6 - - - 0.5 0.5 - - 0.9 Subproject 7 - - 1.5 2.6 1.7 - - 5.8 Subproject 8 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 - 1.4 Subproject 9 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 - 2.7 Total 0.2 1.2 4.8 13.1 10.9 1.6 - - 31.7 4.61

Check 0.6 2.6 6.3 14.3 12.2 2.1 0.4 - 38.5 Financier: ADBCurrency: US$

Unit: Thousands







2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalLoan balance - Opening balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Drawdown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Closing balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Average balance 0 0 0 0 0 0Interest rate during implementation 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Interest During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Commitment charge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Front end fees 0 0Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDI for Component 1



Project Implementation Period (Subproject 1)




2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalLoan balance - Opening balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Drawdown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Closing balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Average balance 0 0 0 0 0 0Interest rate during implementation 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Interest During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Commitement charge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Front end fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDI by component 3



Project Implementation Period Subproject 2)










2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalLoan balance - Opening balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Drawdown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Closing balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Average balance 0 0 0 0 0 0Interest rate during implementation 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Interest During Implementation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Commitment charge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Front end fees 0 0Total Financing Charges During Implementation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
















Financier - Asian Development Bank 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalSubproject 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

check 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Financier - Asian Development Bank 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TotalSubproject 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Subproject 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

check 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Summary of Financing Charges by Subproject (CNY millions)

Summary of Financing Charges by Component (foreign currency 000s)

III. PROJECTED BENEFICIARIES AND TOURISM FORECASTS

1. Calculation of project beneficiaries Subproject Notes Notes

Provincial, district, and rural roads

built or upgraded

Beneficiaries from road projects

Wastewater treatment

capacity added or improved

Land improved through

irrigation, drainage,

and/or flood management

Households with reduced

flood risk

km number m3/day hectares numberLao PDRC1. Nakasang Access Road and Port Rehabilitation 3.4 1,641 3.3km access road + 140m road along port 0.0 0.50 1,641 0.5 hectares along river embankment/port

C2. Don Det/Don Khone Access Improvements11.0 2,585

not including 7km of foot/cycle paths - length of foot paths to be reviewed following cost reduction 0.0 0.00 0

V1. Nam Ngum Reservoir Access Improvements

5.9 1,600

This includes existing roads to be repaired/improved, unsealed roads to be sealed and unmade roads to be constructed. From proposed car park, along lake short, over the hill to Route 10, incl. the sections down to the piers and restaurants. 0.0 0.00 0

V2. Kaeng Yui Waterfall Access Improvements 6.0 3,453 0.0 0.00 0

V3. Western Loop Rural Access Road and Bridge Improvements 29.0 9,500 26km loop road+3km bypass and bridge 0.0 11.00 657

11ha is calculated at 1,100m river bank protection * 100m; 657 population of Ban Houayngae

V4. Vang Vieng Urban Renewal6.5 4,051

includes 4.0 km of footpaths along urban roads, 1.5 km of shared surfacing and 1km of new concrete surfacing 0.0 13.00 2,834

200x650m in southern part of downtown VV; 2,834 population of Ban Viengkeo and Ban Muangsong

V5. Vang Vieng Solid Waste Management Improvements 0.8 0

27,300 residents will benefit from better solid waste collection and management, but not directly from the landfill access road 13.7 0.00 0 5,000m3/year (estimate y Andrew)

Subtotal Lao PDR 62.6 22,830 13.7 24.50 5,132

2. Tourism Forecasts and Projections

Transport Water

Project areaDirect Indirect Direct beneficiaries Indirect beneficiaries

CambodiaKep Province

Kep Solid Waste Management Improvements 9,000 40,0009,000: Kep urban core (Sangkat Kep and half of Sangkat Prey Thom) residential population

Kep Province Population (Economic Census of Cambodia 2011)

Preah Sihanouk ProvinceSihanoukville Seaside Access and Environmental Improvements 12,878 12,878 residentsSihanoukville-Koh Rong Passenger Piers Improvements 1,100 1,100 Koh Rong population (wikipedia)Lao PDRChampasak ProvinceNakasang Access Road and Port Rehabilitation 1,641 1,641 Nakasang residents

Don Det/Don Khone Access Improvements 2,585 1,240 Don Det and 1,345 Don Khone residents

Luang Prabang Province

Luang Prabang Town (output 2 and 3) 24,000 56,000 UNESCO protected area inhabited by around 24,000 (Wikipedia) Town population: 56,000 (Wikipedia)

Vientiane ProvinceNam Ngum Reservoir Access Improvements 1,600 17,786 1,600 people living in Ban Sengsavang 17,786 population of Keo Oudom District

Kaeng Yui Waterfall Access Improvements 3,453873 persons in Ban NadoungNaduang and additional 2,580 persons living along the improved access road

Western Loop Rural Access Road and Bridge Improvements 9,500 9,500 people living in 11 villages alongside the road

Vang Vieng Urban Renewal 4,051 4,051 residents (Ban Savang, Ban Vieng Keo and Ban Mueang Xong)

Vang Vieng Solid Waste Management Improvements 27,300

27,300 Vang Vieng Urban and peri-urban population - presumably the beneficiaries for Urban Renewal are included in the 27,300

Viet NamHoa Binh Province

Tien Pagoda and Cave Access Improvements 10,494 65,020

10,494 people living in Thanh Nong and Phu Lao communes (or the 6,000 people mentioned in the subproject description???)

Lac Thuy District 65,020

Nghe An Province

Cua Lo Beachfront Access and Environmental Improvements 22,013 55,925

22,013 Nghi Hương ward, Nghi Hoa ward, Nghi Hai ward residents. Note: subproject description mentions 55,925 directly benefitting.

55,925 Cua Lo District residents

Ru Gam Pagoda Access Improvements 20,236 275,165 20,236 residents of Bac Thanh, Xuan Thanh and Tang Thanh villages

275,165 (2008) population of Yên Thành District (Wikipedia)

Quang Binh Province

CALCULATION OF BENEFICIARIES

Last formal census in Viet Nam: 2009

66,700 Sihanoukville urban population (2008, Wikipedia)

Beneficiaries Notes

59,661 59,661 population of Vang Vieng District

93,432 93,432 Khong District population (2015 census)

66,700

Last formal census in Lao PDR: 2015

Last formal census in Cambodia: 2018

Project areaDirect Indirect Direct beneficiaries Indirect beneficiaries

Beneficiaries Notes

Nhat Le – Le Dong River and Road Improvements 19,727 116,9035,553 residents in Hai Thanh ward (Dong Hoi City); 14,174 residents in Quan Hau, Hien Ninh and Truong Xuan communes

116,903 Dong Hoi City population (+ 89,908 people in Quang Ninh District, where Quan Hau, Hien Ninh and Truong Xuan communes are located?)

Quang Tri Province

Cua Viet/Cua Tung Beach Access/Environmental Improvements 6,769 Trung Giang (3,406 persons) and Gio Hai (3,363 persons)

Con Co Island Access Improvements 3,863

3,363 residents of Gio Hai commune + 500 Con Co Island inhabitants - note: 3,363 Gio Hai are also counted for the Cua Viet/Cua Tung beach improvements

Thua Thien Hue Province

Hon Chen Temple Access Improvements 14,534 116,147 14,543 residents of Huong Tho, Huong Ho wards

116,147 population of Hương Trà Town, which covers a large area - but the temple is on the boundary of the town and Hue city, and so indirect beneficairies could also include Hue city population, or possibly more realistically only Hue city population (in this case the indirect beneficiaries for Hon Chen Temple and Huong River Tourist Piers should be combined to avoid double counting).

Huong River Tourist Piers Improvement 55,159 354,124

Five river piers:1. Bao Vinh Heritage Pier: 13,177 Huong Vinh commune (Huong Tra Town)2. Than Pier and 4. Voi Re/Ho Quyen Pier: 10,012 Thủy Biều ward (Hue City)3. Le Loi Pier: 7,471 Vĩnh Ninh ward (Hue City) 5. Thanh Tien Pier: 11,285 Phu Mau Commune (Phu Vang District)Two lagoon piers: 13,214 Quang Ngan and Quang Loi Communes (Quang Dien District)

Hue City: 354,124 population (2015) (OR: 876,295 comprising the population of Hue City, Huong Tra Town and the surrounding districts in which the piers are located)

Da Bac Access Improvements 15,626 138,123 15,626 residents of Loc Dien and Loc Hoa commune 138,123 Phu Loc District population

75,185 residents of Gio Linh District75,185

CLV's share of ASEAN's international visitor arrivals 2012-2016 ('000)Incr. growth CLV as result of project: 1.5%

2016

CAGR 2012-2016

(%)

ASEAN Share

(%) 2025

ASEAN Share

(%) 2025

ASEAN Share

(%)Cambodia 5,012 8.7 4.3 7,641 4.3 7,976 4.5Lao PDR 4,239 6.2 3.7 6,463 3.7 6,746 3.8

Subtotal CAM+LAO 9,251 7.5 8.0 14,104 8.0 14,722 8.3CL share of ASEAN (%) 8.0 8.0 8.3

Viet Nam 10,013 10.0 8.6 15,266 8.6 15,934 9.0Subtotal CLV 19,264 8.8 16.6 29,370 16.6 30,656 17.3

CLV share of ASEAN (%) 16.6 1.8 16.6 17.3Total ASEAN 116,121 6.8 177,041 177,041

Source: ASEAN Secretariat Source: Asian Development Bank projectionsAssumptions:- ASEAN growth at UNWTO projections for Southeast Asia (2010-2020: 5.8%; 2020-2030: 4.3%)- Incremental share Cambodia, Lao PDR and Viet Nam as result of project: 1.5%

Annual international visitor arrivals in project target areas 2012-2016 ('000) Outcome Targets

Without Project With Project

2016

CAGR 2012-2016

(%) 2025 2025Cambodia

Preah Sihanouk Province 404.9 17.5 664.5 670.2 5.7 0.9%Kep Province 53.7 8.6 83.7 84.5 0.7 0.9%

Lao PDRChampasak Province 133.6 1.0 199.1 200.8 1.7 0.9%Luang Prabang Province 469.6 12.4 748.2 754.7 6.5 0.9%Vientiane Province 216.9 -8.9 305.0 307.6 2.6 0.9%

Subtotal CAM+LAO 1,278.7 6.6 2,000.5 2,017.8 17.3 0.9% 739.1Viet Nam

Hoa Binh Province 90.5 18.1 149.0 150.3 1.3 0.9%Nghe An Province 72.9 -7.1 103.6 104.5 0.9 0.9%Quang Binh Province 38.7 6.9 59.7 60.2 0.5 0.9%Quang Tri Province 90.0 -7.1 127.9 129.0 1.1 0.9%

Baseline

2025

Baseline

Outcome Targets

With ProjectWithout Project

Incremental arrivals

Thua Thien Hue Province 728.7 -0.1 1,079.5 1,088.8 9.3 0.9%Subtotal VIE 1,020.7 -0.1 1,519.7 1,532.8 13.1 0.9% 512.1

Total CLV 2,299.4 3.4 3,520.2 3,550.6 30.5 0.9%Source: National and provincial tourism offices

Aggregate annual visitor expenditure in project areas 2012-2016 ($million) Outcome Targets

Without Project With Project Incremental expenditure

2016

CAGR 2012-2016

(%) 2025 2025Cambodia

Preah Sihanouk Province 96.0 23.5 163.5 175.6 12.1 7.4%Kep Province 90.3 9.6 141.6 151.8 10.1 7.1%

Lao PDRChampasak Province 64.1 15.9 96.5 99.8 3.3 3.5%Luang Prabang Province 200.4 12.2 318.9 335.2 16.3 5.1%Vientiane Province 99.4 9.5 148.5 154.0 5.5 3.7%

Subtotal CAM+LAO 550.2 13.2 869.1 916.4 47.3 5.4%Viet Nam

Hoa Binh Province 19.9 30.6 31.7 33.8 2.1 6.5%Nghe An Province 193.4 8.4 289.4 310.2 20.7 7.2%Quang Binh Province 78.8 16.3 129.7 142.7 13.0 10.0%Quang Tri Province 27.4 1.8 39.3 42.5 3.2 8.2%Thua Thien Hue Province 145.6 8.1 216.0 229.4 13.4 6.2%

Subtotal VIE 465.1 9.6 706.0 758.5 52.5 7.4%Total CLV 1,015.3 11.5 1,575.1 1,674.9 99.8 6.3%Source: National and provincial tourism offices

2025

Baseline

Growth rate assumptions international and domestic tourist arrivals

UNWTO forecasts for international arrivals in SE Asia Assumptions for "without project" provincial arrivals growth rates2010-2030 5.1% 2018-2022: UNWTO forecast for 2010-2030 (5.1%) plus 10% of difference between CAGR 2012-2016 and the UNWTO forecast

2010-2020 5.8% 2023-2030: UNWTO forecast for 2020-2030 (4.3%) plus 5% of difference between rate for 2018-2022 and UNWTO forecasted rate2020-2030 4.3% 2031-2040: Rate for 2023-2030 minus difference between UNWTO 2010-2020 forecast (5.8%) and 2020-2030 forecast (4.3%)

Source: UNWTO Tourism Highlights, 2016 Edition 2041-2047: Rate for 2031-2040 minus difference between UNWTO 2010-2020 forecast (5.8%) and 2020-2030 forecast (4.3%)

IndicatorGrowth CAGR

2016/2015 2012-2016 2017-2022 2023-2030 2031-2040 2041-2046 2017-2022 2023-2030 2031-2040 2041-2046

Lao PDR Assumed incremental provincial arrival growth for the "with project" scenario: 0.00% 0.30% 0.25% 0.10%International arrivals -9.5% 6.2% 5.17% 4.34% 2.84% 1.34% 5.17% 4.34% 2.84% 1.34%

Champasak ProvinceInternational arrivals -11.7% 1.0% 4.64% 4.32% 2.82% 1.32% 4.64% 4.62% 3.07% 1.42%Domestic arrivals 6.8% 14.3% 5.97% 4.38% 2.88% 1.38% 5.97% 4.68% 3.13% 1.48%Subprojects:

C1 Nakasang Access Road and Port Rehabilitation & C2 Don Det-Don Khone Access Improvements Assumed incremental growth on top of provincial forecast for "with-project": 0.00% 0.30% 0.20% 0.00%Visitor arrivals Don Det-Don Khone

International visitor arrivals 4.64% 4.32% 2.82% 1.32% 4.64% 4.92% 3.27% 1.42%Domestic visitor arrivals 5.97% 4.38% 2.88% 1.38% 5.97% 4.98% 3.33% 1.48%

Luang Prabang ProvinceInternational arrivals 5.3% 12.4% 5.78% 4.37% 2.87% 1.37% 5.78% 4.67% 3.12% 1.47%Domestic arrivals 7.4% 10.5% 5.59% 4.36% 2.86% 1.36% 5.59% 4.66% 3.11% 1.46%

Vientiane ProvinceInternational arrivals 0.4% -8.9% 3.66% 4.27% 2.77% 1.27% 3.66% 4.57% 3.02% 1.37%Domestic arrivals 5.0% 23.7% 6.91% 4.43% 2.93% 1.43% 6.91% 4.73% 3.18% 1.53%Subprojects:

V1 Nam Ngum Reservoir Access Improvements Assumed incremental growth on top of provincial forecast for "with-project": 0.00% 3.50% 3.00% 0.00%Nam Ngum Reservoir

International visitors 3.66% 4.27% 2.77% 1.27% 3.66% 8.07% 6.02% 1.37%Domestic visitors 6.91% 4.43% 2.93% 1.43% 6.91% 8.23% 6.18% 1.53%

V2 Kaeng Yui Waterfall Access Improvements Assumed incremental growth on top of provincial forecast for "with-project": 0.00% 4.00% 2.50% 0.00%Kaeng Yui Waterfall


V3 Western Loop Rural Access Road and Bridge Improvements Assumed incremental growth on top of provincial forecast for "with-project": 0.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.00%Western Loop Road


V4 Vang Vieng Urban Renewal Assumed incremental growth on top of provincial forecast for "with-project": 0.00% 0.10% 0.05% 0.00%Vang Vieng Town


Without-project scenario With-project scenarioGrowth rate assumptionsHistoric growth rates

LAO PDRChampasak Province Baseline Conditions 2012-2016

Indicator 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Growth 2016/2015

(%)

CAGR 2012-2016

(%)Tourist arrivals - Total 362,724 390,506 452,803 525,647 533,264 1.4 10.1

International tourists 128,391 135,535 134,043 151,289 133,572 -11.7 1.0Domestic tourists 234,333 254,971 318,760 374,358 399,692 6.8 14.3

Tourism receipts - Total ($mln) 35.5 44.7 49.9 65.7 64.1 -2.5 15.9International tourists ($mln) 30.8 39.6 43.6 58.2 56.1 -3.7 16.2Domestic tourists ($mln) 4.7 5.1 6.4 7.5 8.0 6.8 14.3

Length of StayInternational tourists 6.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 0.0 3.9Domestic tourists 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0

Average daily expenditureInternational tourists ($) 40.0 45.0 50.0 60.0 60.0 0.0 10.7Domestic tourists ($) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0

Average receipts per touristInternational tourists ($) 240.0 292.5 325.0 385.0 420.0 9.1 15.0Domestic tourists ($) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0

Source: Champasak Provincial Department of Information, Culture and Tourism

Luang Prabang Province Baseline Conditions 2012-2016

Indicator 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Growth 2016/2015

(%)

CAGR 2012-2016


International tourists 294,213 342,611 378,999 445,872 469,586 5.3 12.4Domestic tourists 116,624 125,354 152,328 161,712 173,733 7.4 10.5

Tourism receipts - Total ($mln) 126.7 146.0 163.5 189.8 200.4 5.6 12.2International tourists ($mln) 110.3 128.5 142.1 167.2 176.1 5.3 12.4Domestic tourists ($mln) 16.3 17.5 21.3 22.6 24.3 7.4 10.5

Length of StayInternational tourists 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0Domestic tourists 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0


Average receipts per touristInternational tourists ($) 375.0 375.0 375.0 375.0 375.0 0.0 0.0Domestic tourists ($) 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 0.0 0.0

Source: Luang Prabang Provincial Department of Information, Culture and Tourism

Vientiane Province Baseline Conditions 2012-2016

Indicator 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Growth 2016/2015

(%)

CAGR 2012-2016


International tourists 314,762 190,663 203,171 216,083 216,887 0.4 -8.9Domestic tourists 155,216 319,733 300,878 345,772 363,061 5.0 23.7

Tourism receipts - Total ($mln) 69.0 75.0 96.3 132.2 99.4 -24.9 9.5International tourists ($mln) 66.1 53.4 81.3 103.7 69.4 -33.1 1.2Domestic tourists ($mln) 2.9 21.6 15.0 28.5 30.0 5.0 79.1

Length of StayInternational tourists 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 -33.3 7.5Domestic tourists 1.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 31.6


Average receipts per touristInternational tourists ($) 210.0 280.0 400.0 480.0 320.0 -33.3 11.1Domestic tourists ($) 18.8 67.5 50.0 82.5 82.5 0.0 44.8

Source: Vientiane Provincial Department of Information, Culture and Tourism

TOURISM BASELINE DATA BY PROVINCE

TOURISM FORECASTS

LAO PDR

Champasak Province Tourism Forecasts 2016-2046Baseline

2016 2026 2036 2046 2026 2036 2046Tourist arrivals - Total 533,264 879,791 1,236,890 1,502,661 889,951 1,284,188 1,584,691 10,159 1.2% 47,298 3.8% 82,030 5.5%

International tourists 133,572 207,699 290,572 351,251 210,099 301,689 370,435 2,400 1.2% 11,117 3.8% 19,184 5.5%Domestic tourists 399,692 672,092 946,317 1,151,410 679,852 982,499 1,214,256 7,760 1.2% 36,181 3.8% 62,846 5.5%

Tourism receipts - Total ($mln) 64.1 100.7 141.0 170.6 104.5 150.1 184.5 3.8 3.8% 9.2 6.5% 14.0 8.2%International tourists ($mln) 56.1 87.2 122.0 147.5 89.5 128.5 157.8 2.3 2.6% 6.5 5.3% 10.3 7.0%Domestic tourists ($mln) 8.0 13.4 18.9 23.0 15.0 21.6 26.7 1.5 11.3% 2.7 14.2% 3.7 16.0%

Average receipts per touristInternational tourists ($) 420.0 420.0 420.0 420.0 426.0 426.0 426.0 6.0 1.4% 6.0 1.4% 6.0 1.4%Domestic tourists ($) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 2.0 10.0% 2.0 10.0% 2.0 10.0%

Source: Champasak Provincial Department of Information, Culture and Tourism; Asian Development Bank Estimates.

Champasak Province Subproject Forecasts 2016-2046Baseline

2016 2026 2036 2046 2026 2036 2046 C1 Nakasang Access Road and Port Rehabilitation & C2 Don Det-Don Khone Access Improvements

Nakasang ferry serviceFerry-trips 5,760 9,144 12,815 15,519 9,356 13,773 17,073 212 2.3% 958 7.5% 1,554 10.0%Passenger-trips 138,833 220,401 308,883 374,053 225,514 331,966 411,518 5,114 2.3% 23,084 7.5% 37,465 10.0%

International 100,540 159,610 223,687 270,882 163,313 240,403 298,013 3,703 2.3% 16,717 7.5% 27,131 10.0%Domestic 38,293 60,791 85,196 103,172 62,201 91,563 113,505 1,410 2.3% 6,367 7.5% 10,334 10.0%

Fare receipts ($) 299,320 475,177 665,942 806,447 486,202 715,709 887,221 11,025 2.3% 49,768 7.5% 80,774 10.0%Don Det-Don Khone IslandsVisitor arrivals 203,055 322,355 451,767 547,085 329,834 485,529 601,880 7,479 2.3% 33,762 7.5% 54,796 10.0%


Tourism receipts ($mln) 14.1 22.0 30.8 37.2 25.7 37.8 46.8 3.7 17.1% 7.1 23.0% 9.6 25.9%Don Det-Don Khone tourist transport serviceVehicle-trips 3,874 6,150 8,619 10,438 6,293 9,263 11,483 143 2.3% 644 7.5% 1,045 10.0%Passenger-trips 9,992 15,863 22,231 26,921 16,231 23,892 29,618 368 2.3% 1,661 7.5% 2,696 10.0%

International 5,990 9,509 13,327 16,139 9,730 14,323 17,755 221 2.3% 996 7.5% 1,616 10.0%Domestic 4,002 6,353 8,904 10,782 6,501 9,569 11,862 147 2.3% 665 7.5% 1,080 10.0%

Fare receipts ($) 61,550 97,712 136,939 165,832 99,979 147,173 182,441 2,267 2.3% 10,234 7.5% 16,610 10.0%Source: Champasak Provincial Department of Information, Culture and Tourism; Asian Development Bank Estimates.

2036 2046Indicator Without Project With Project Incremental With-Project benefits2026

Indicator Without Project With Project Incremental With-Project benefits2026 2036 2046

Luang Prabang Province Tourism Forecasts 2016-2046Baseline

2016 2026 2036 2046 2026 2036 2046Tourist arrivals - Total 643,319 1,066,658 1,500,136 1,823,113 1,078,974 1,557,498 1,922,633 12,317 1.2% 57,363 3.8% 99,520 5.5%

International tourists 469,586 780,964 1,098,613 1,335,479 789,982 1,140,621 1,408,378 9,018 1.2% 42,008 3.8% 72,899 5.5%Domestic tourists 173,733 285,693 401,523 487,633 288,993 416,878 514,254 3,299 1.2% 15,355 3.8% 26,621 5.5%



Source: Luang Prabang Provincial Department of Information, Culture and Tourism; Asian Development Bank Estimates.

Vientiane Province Tourism Forecasts 2016-2046Baseline

2016 2026 2036 2046 2026 2036 2046Tourist arrivals - Total 579,948 962,812 1,354,796 1,647,447 973,929 1,406,598 1,737,373 11,117 1.2% 51,802 3.8% 89,926 5.5%

International tourists 216,887 317,980 442,733 532,597 321,655 459,680 561,700 3,675 1.2% 16,947 3.8% 29,103 5.5%Domestic tourists 363,061 644,832 912,063 1,114,850 652,274 946,918 1,175,672 7,442 1.2% 34,856 3.8% 60,822 5.5%



Source: Vientiane Provincial Department of Information, Culture and Tourism; Asian Development Bank Estimates.

Incremental With-Project benefits2026

Indicator 2036 2046Without Project With Project Incremental With-Project benefits

2026

Indicator 2036 2046Without Project With Project

Vientiane Province Subproject Forecasts 2016-2046Baseline

2016 2026 2036 2046 2026 2036 2046V1 Nam Ngum Reservoir Access Improvements Nam Ngum 1 Reservoir Recreational AreaVisitor arrivals 51,701 89,029 125,632 153,208 102,715 201,525 279,959 13,686 15.4% 75,893 60.4% 126,750 82.7%


Tourism receipts ($mln) 1.3 2.2 3.1 3.8 2.9 5.7 7.9 0.7 31.9% 2.6 83.3% 4.1 108.9%V2 Kaeng Yui Waterfall Access Improvements Kaeng Yui WaterfallVisitor arrivals 32,050 53,994 76,065 92,603 63,456 123,073 167,492 9,462 17.5% 47,008 61.8% 74,889 80.9%

International - paying 6,468 9,483 13,203 15,883 11,147 21,375 28,748 1,664 17.5% 8,171 61.9% 12,864 81.0%Domestic - paying 15,468 27,473 38,858 47,498 32,285 62,860 85,889 4,812 17.5% 24,002 61.8% 38,392 80.8%Non-paying visitors 10,114 17,039 24,004 29,223 20,025 38,838 52,855 2,986 17.5% 14,834 61.8% 23,633 80.9%

Tourism receipts ($) 188,466 317,507 447,289 544,542 373,145 723,713 984,915 55,637 17.5% 276,424 61.8% 440,373 80.9%Ban Naduang HomestayHomestay guests 1,186 1,776 2,478 2,987 2,088 4,011 5,405 312 17.5% 1,533 61.9% 2,419 81.0%

International 1,065 1,561 2,174 2,615 1,835 3,519 4,733 274 17.5% 1,345 61.9% 2,118 81.0%Domestic 121 215 304 372 253 492 672 38 17.5% 188 61.8% 300 80.8%

Tourism receipts ($) 13,150 19,695 27,475 33,117 23,150 44,476 59,934 3,455 17.5% 17,000 61.9% 26,816 81.0%V3 Western Loop Rural Access Road and Bridge Improvements Western Loop RoadVisitor arrivals 80,830 131,627 184,930 224,525 140,946 227,979 292,217 9,319 7.1% 43,050 23.3% 67,692 30.1%


Tourism receipts ($mln) 2.4 3.8 5.3 6.4 4.8 7.8 10.0 1.1 28.5% 2.5 47.9% 3.6 56.2%V4 Vang Vieng Urban Renewal Vang Vieng TownVisitor arrivals 183,245 312,565 440,751 537,102 317,383 462,451 573,529 4,818 1.5% 21,700 4.9% 36,426 6.8%

International 41,602 60,993 84,923 102,160 61,934 89,109 109,097 941 1.5% 4,186 4.9% 6,938 6.8%Domestic 141,643 251,572 355,828 434,943 255,449 373,342 464,431 3,877 1.5% 17,513 4.9% 29,489 6.8%

Tourism receipts ($mln) 25.0 40.3 56.5 68.6 42.1 61.1 75.4 1.8 4.5% 4.5 8.0% 6.8 9.9%Source: Vientiane Provincial Department of Information, Culture and Tourism; Asian Development Bank Estimates.

Indicator Without Project With Project Incremental With-Project benefits2026 2036 2046

Assumption for Calculating Tourism Benefits for Champasak

2018-2023 2024-2030 2031-2040 2041-2046International arrivals growth rate 4.6% 4.3% 2.8% 1.3%International length of stay (days) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0International daily spending ($) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0Domestic arrivals growth rate 6.0% 4.4% 2.9% 1.4%Domestic length of stay (days) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0Domestic daily spending ($) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0


Assumption for Calculating Tourism Benefits for Luang Prabang



Assumption for Calculating Tourism Benefits for Vientiane Province



Profile With Project

Without ProjectProfile


Profile Without Project


Profile Without Project

ASEANAAGR CAGR ASEAN share (%)

2012 2013 2013/2012 2014 2014/2013 2015 2015/2014 2016 2016/2015 2012-2016 2012-2016 2016Brunei Darussalama 209 225 7.6% 201 -10.7% 218 8.6% 219 0.3% - 1.1% 0.2%Cambodia 3,584 4,210 17.5% 4,503 7.0% 4,775 6.1% 5,012 5.0% 8.9% 8.7% 4.3%Indonesia 8,044 8,802 9.4% 9,435 7.2% 10,407 10.3% 12,023 15.5% 10.6% 10.6% 10.4%Lao PDR 3,330 3,779 13.5% 4,159 10.0% 4,684 12.6% 4,239 -9.5% 6.7% 6.2% 3.7%Malaysia 25,033 25,716 2.7% 27,437 6.7% 25,721 -6.3% 26,757 4.0% 1.8% 1.7% 23.0%Myanmar 1,059 2,044 93.0% 3,081 50.7% 4,681 51.9% 2,900 -38.0% 39.4% 28.6% 2.5%The Philippines 4,273 4,681 9.6% 4,833 3.2% 5,361 10.9% 5,967 11.3% 8.8% 8.7% 5.1%Singapore 14,491 15,568 7.4% 15,095 -3.0% 15,231 0.9% 16,403 7.7% 3.2% 3.1% 14.1%Thailand 22,354 26,547 18.8% 24,780 -6.7% 29,881 20.6% 32,588 9.1% 10.4% 9.9% 28.1%Viet Nam 6,848 7,572 10.6% 7,874 4.0% 7,944 0.9% 10,013 26.1% 10.4% 10.0% 8.6%ASEAN 89,225 99,145 11.1% 101,399 2.3% 108,904 7.4% 116,121 6.6% 6.9% 6.8% 100.0%ASEAN-CLV 75,463 83,583 10.8% 84,863 1.5% 91,500 7.8% 96,857 5.9% 6.5% 6.4%

a International arrivals by air only for Brunei Darussalam. 2016/2012: 28.35%Source: ASEAN Secretariat 30.14%

CLMV countriesAAGR CAGR ASEAN share (%)

2012 2013 2013/2012 2014 2014/2013 2015 2015/2014 2016 2016/2015 2012-2016 2012-2016 2016Cambodia 3,584 4,210 17.5% 4,503 7.0% 4,775 6.1% 5,012 5.0% 8.9% 8.7% 4.3%Lao PDR 3,330 3,779 13.5% 4,159 10.0% 4,684 12.6% 4,239 -9.5% 6.7% 6.2% 3.7%Myanmar 1,059 2,044 93.0% 3,081 50.7% 4,681 51.9% 2,900 -38.0% 39.4% 28.6% 2.5%Viet Nam 6,848 7,572 10.6% 7,874 4.0% 7,944 0.9% 10,013 26.1% 10.4% 10.0% 8.6%CLMV 14,821 17,606 18.8% 19,617 11.4% 22,084 12.6% 22,164 0.4% 10.8% 10.6% 19.1%

Source: ASEAN Secretariat

CLMV ASEAN share 16.6% 17.8% 19.3% 20.3% 19.1%

CLV countriesAAGR CAGR ASEAN share (%)

2012 2013 2013/2012 2014 2014/2013 2015 2015/2014 2016 2016/2015 2012-2016 2012-2016 2016Cambodia 3,584 4,210 17.5% 4,503 7.0% 4,775 6.1% 5,012 5.0% 8.9% 8.7% 4.3%Lao PDR 3,330 3,779 13.5% 4,159 10.0% 4,684 12.6% 4,239 -9.5% 6.7% 6.2% 3.7%Viet Nam 6,848 7,572 10.6% 7,874 4.0% 7,944 0.9% 10,013 26.1% 10.4% 10.0% 8.6%

Country

CountryArrivals (in thousands of persons)

Arrivals (thousands of persons)

CountryArrivals (thousands of persons)

CLV 13,762 15,562 13.1% 16,536 6.3% 17,403 5.2% 19,264 10.7% 8.8% 8.8% 16.6%Source: ASEAN Secretariat 2016/2012: 39.98%

CLV ASEAN share 15.4% 15.7% 16.3% 16.0% 16.6%

Tourism in Cambodia, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, and Viet NamCambodia Lao PDR Viet Nam Source

International visitor arrivals 2016 (million) 5.01 4.24 10.01 NTOs

International visitor arrivals AAGR 2008–2016 (%) 12.5 15.4 10.1 NTOs

International visitor expenditure 2016 ($ billion) a 3.21 0.72 18.18 NTOs

Direct contribution to gross domestic product 2016 (%) 12.2 4.3 4.6 WTTC

Tourism workers (direct employment) 2016 (thousand) 988.2 118.0 1,959.6 WTTC

Women’s share of direct employment (%) ~54 ~50 ~70

Tourism investment 2016 ($ billion) 0.62 0.55 5.45 WTTC

International visitor expenditures, share of total exports 2016 (%) 26.5 23.1 4.5 WTTC

Average expenditure per international visitor 2016 ($) 641 171 1,816 NTOs

2008 2010 2012 2014 2015 2016Growth

2016/2015CAGR

2012/2016Growth

2016/2012

ASEAN Share

(%)Cambodia 2,125 2,508 3,584 4,503 4,775 5,012 5.0% 8.7% 39.8% 4.3%Lao PDR 1,736 2,513 3,330 4,159 4,684 4,239 -9.5% 6.2% 27.3% 3.7%Myanmar 193 792 1,058 3,081 4,681 2,900 -38.0% 28.7% 174.1% 2.5%Viet Nam 4,207 5,050 6,848 7,874 7,944 10,013 26.0% 10.0% 46.2% 8.6%

Subtotal 8,261 10,863 14,820 19,617 22,084 22,164 0.4% 10.6% 49.6% 19.1%Brunei Darussalama 226 214 209 201 218 219 0.4% 1.2% 4.7% 0.2%Indonesia 5,506 7,003 8,045 9,435 10,407 12,023 15.5% 10.6% 49.4% 10.4%Malaysia 20,236 24,577 25,033 27,437 25,721 26,757 4.0% 1.7% 6.9% 23.0%Philippines 3,092 3,521 4,273 4,833 5,361 5,967 11.3% 8.7% 39.6% 5.1%Singapore 10,288 11,639 14,491 15,095 15,231 16,403 7.7% 3.1% 13.2% 14.1%Thailand 14,464 15,936 22,354 24,780 29,881 32,588 9.1% 9.9% 45.8% 28.1%

Subtotal (ASEAN-6) 53,812 62,890 74,405 81,781 86,819 93,957 8.2% 6.0% 26.3% 80.9%Total (ASEAN) 62,073 73,753 89,225 101,398 108,903 116,121 6.6% 6.8% 30.1% 100.0%

a International arrivals by air only for Brunei Darussalam.

IV. WATER QUALITY TEST

ADB 2nd GMS Tourism Infrastructure for Inclusive Growth Project

Wat

er S

ample

s Water samples Code NN1

Date 26/07/2017

Time 11:30

Location Nam Ngeum1

Coordinate N 18°31'29.79"N

E 102°33'20.93"E

Weather Previous date Sunny

Measure date Foggy

1 Odor Acceptable

2 Color Clear

3 Air temperature 32˚C

4 Water temperature 30.1˚C

Sampling Location Map


Wat

er S

ample


Date 26/07/2017

Time 11:15

Location Nam Ngeum1


E 102°33'21.70"E


Measure date Cloudy

1 Odor Acceptable

2 Color Clear





Wat

er S

ample


Date 26/07/2017

Time 10:30

Location Nam Ngeum1


E 102°33'25.33"E


Measure date Cloudy

1 Odor Acceptable

2 Color Clear





Wat

er S

ample


Date 26/07/2017

Time 10:55

Location Nam Ngeum1


E 102°33'27.16"E


Measure date Cloudy

1 Odor Acceptable

2 Color Clear




Indicative water quality

stations in Nam Ngum

Reservoir

John

Line

John

Line

John

Line

John

Line

ADB 2nd GMS Tourism Infrastructure for Inclusive Growth Project W

ater

Sam

ple

s Water samples Code NS1

Date 25/07/2017

Time 12:15

Location Namsong Vangvieng


E 102°26'39.41"E

Weather Previous date Cloudy

Measure date Sunny

1 Odor Acceptable

2 Color Yellow





ater

Sam

ple


Date 25/07/2017

Time 11:55



E 102°26'43.96"E


Measure date Sunny

1 Odor Acceptable

2 Color Yellow


4 Water temperature 28˚C



ater

Sam

ple


Date 25/07/2017

Time 11:20



E 102°26'39.55"E


Measure date Sunny

1 Odor Acceptable

2 Color Yellow


4 Water temperature 29˚C



ater

Sam

ple


Date 25/07/2017

Time 10:50



E 102°26'36.65"E


Measure date Sunny

1 Odor Acceptable

2 Color Yellow




Indicative water quality

sampling stations in Nam Son

River

John

Line

John

Line

John

Line

John

Line

Documents

Technical Assistance Consultant's Report - Asian Development Bank