11
1 ɍȾɄ 504.454:597.597.556.333.1 ɉɈɊȱȼɇəɇɇə ȺɇȺɅȱɁɍ ɋɉȿɄɌɊȱȼ ɀɂȼɅȿɇɇə ȻɂɑɄȺ ɄɊɍȽɅəɄȺ NEOGOBIUS MELANOSTOMUS (PALLAS, 1814) ɉɊȱɋɇɂɏ ɌȺ ɋɈɅɈɇɍȼȺɌɈȼɈȾɇɂɏ ȼɈȾɈɃɆ ȼɉ. ɈɇɈɉɊȱȯɇɄɈ, ɚɫɩɿɪɚɧɬ*, ȱɋ. ɆɂɌəɃ, ɤɚɧɞɢɞɚɬ ɛɿɨɥɨɝɿɱɧɢɯ ɧɚɭɤ, ɇɚɰɿɨɧɚɥɶɧɢɣ ɭɧɿɜɟɪɫɢɬɟɬ ɛɿɨɪɟɫɭɪɫɿɜ ɿ ɩɪɢɪɨɞɨɤɨɪɢɫɬɭɜɚɧɧɹ ɍɤɪɚʀɧɢ Ɇɘ. ɌɄȺɑȿɇɄɈ, ɚɫɩɿɪɚɧɬ**, Ɍɚɜɪɿɣɫɶɤɢɣ ɞɟɪɠɚɜɧɢɣ ɚɝɪɨɬɟɯɧɨɥɨɝɿɱɧɢɣ ɭɧɿɜɟɪɫɢɬɟɬ Ⱦɨɫɥɿɞɠɟɧɨ ɫɩɟɤɬɪ ɠɢɜɥɟɧɧɹ ɛɢɱɤɚ ɤɪɭɝɥɹɤɚ (Neogobius melanostomus Pallas, 1814) ɜ ɜɨɞɨɣɦɚɯ ɪɿɡɧɨʀ ɫɨɥɨɧɨɫɬɿ ɰɟɧɬɪɚɥɶɧɢɯ ɬɚ ɩɿɜɞɟɧɧɢɯ ɪɟɝɿɨɧɿɜ ɍɤɪɚʀɧɢ. ȼ ɣɨɝɨ ɪɚɰɿɨɧɿ ɜɢɹɜɥɟɧɨ ɨɪɝɚɧɿɡɦɢ, ɹɤɿ ɧɚɥɟɠɚɬɶ ɞɨ 22 ɬɚɤɫɨɧɿɜ. ɇɚɣɛɿɥɶɲ ɜɚɠɥɢɜɢɦɢ ɤɨɪɦɨɜɢɦɢ ɨɛɽɤɬɚɦɢ ɩɪɿɫɧɢɯ ɜɨɞɨɣɦ ɽ ɜɢɳɿ ɪɚɤɨɩɨɞɿɛɧɿ (Gammaridae, Corophiidae), ɚ ɫɨɥɨɧɭɜɚɬɨɜɨɞɧɢɯ ɞɜɨɫɬɭɥɤɨɜɿ ɦɨɥɸɫɤɢ (Mytilaster lineatus, Abra ovata). Ʉɥɚɫɬɟɪɧɢɣ ɚɧɚɥɿɡ ɩɨɞɿɛɧɨɫɬɿ ɨɛ¶ɽɤɬɿɜ ɠɢɜɥɟɧɧɹ ɩɨɤɚɡɚɜ ɱɿɬɤɟ ɪɨɡɞɿɥɟɧɧɹ ɫɩɟɤɬɪɿɜ ɠɢɜɥɟɧɧɹ ɞɨɫɥɿɞɠɭɜɚɧɢɯ ɬɢɩɿɜ ɜɨɞɨɣɦ. Ʉɥɸɱɨɜɿ ɫɥɨɜɚ: ɋɩɟɤɬɪɢ ɠɢɜɥɟɧɧɹ, ɩɪɿɫɧɿ ɬɚ ɫɨɥɨɧɿ ɜɨɞɨɣɦɢ, ɿɧɞɟɤɫ ɜɢɞɨɜɨʀ ɩɨɞɿɛɧɿɫɬɿ. Ȼɢɱɨɤ ɤɪɭɝɥɹɤ Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) ɡɚ ɨɫɬɚɧɧɿ 60 ɪɨɤɿɜ ɡɧɚɱɧɨ ɪɨɡɲɢɪɢɜ ɫɜɿɣ ɚɪɟɚɥ ɿɫɧɭɜɚɧɧɹ. ɐɟ ɪɿɱɤɢ ɒɟɥɶɞɚ, ɋɚɜɚ, Ⱦɭɧɚɣ, ɡɚɬɨɤɚ Ƚɞɚɧɫɶɤ, ɪɿɱɤɨɜɿ ɫɢɫɬɟɦɢ ɿ ɜɨɞɨɫɯɨɜɢɳɚ Ɋɨɫɿɣɫɶɤɨʀ Ɏɟɞɟɪɚɰɿʀ Ʉɭɣɛɢɲɟɜɫɶɤɟ ɬɚ ɋɚɪɚɬɨɜɫɶɤɟ, ɪɿɱɤɚ ȼɨɥɝɚ. ɍ 60-ɯ ɪɨɤɚɯ ɏɏ ɫɬ. ɜɿɧ ɛɭɜ ɿɧɬɪɨɞɭɤɨɜɚɧɢɣ ɭ ɪɿɱɤɢ (Ⱦɟɬɪɨɣɬ, ɋɟɧɬ Ʉɥɟɪ, Ɇɿɫɫɿɫɿɩɿ) ɬɚ ɨɡɟɪɚ (ȼɟɥɢɤɿ Ɉɡɟɪɚ) ɋɒȺ ɬɚ Ʉɚɧɚɞɢ ɤɚɧɚɥ Ɍɪɟɧɬɋɟɜɟɪɧ, ȼɟɪɯɧɽ ɨɡɟɪɨ, ɪɿɱɤɢ Ʉɚɧɚɪɞ ɬɚ ɋɜ. Ʌɚɜɪɟɧɬɿɹ), ɞɟ ɜɠɟ ɫɶɨɝɨɞɧɿ ɧɟɜɩɢɧɧɨ ɡɛɿɥɶɲɭɽ ɫɜɨɸ ɱɢɫɟɥɶɧɿɫɬɶ [7, 8, 10, 11, 12]. * ɇɚɭɤɨɜɢɣ ɤɟɪɿɜɧɢɤ ɤɚɧɞɢɞɚɬ ɛɿɨɥɨɝɿɱɧɢɯ ɧɚɭɤ ȱɋ. Ɇɢɬɹɣ. ** ɇɚɭɤɨɜɢɣ ɤɟɪɿɜɧɢɤ ɞɨɤɬɨɪ ɛɿɨɥɨɝɿɱɧɢɯ ɧɚɭɤ ȼɈ. Ⱦɟɦɱɟɧɤɨ

ПОРІВНЯННЯ АНАЛІЗУ СПЕКТРА ЖИВЛЕННЯ БИЧКА КРУГЛЯКА NEOGOBIUS MELANOSTOMUS (PALLAS, 1814) ПРІСНИХ ТА СОЛОНУВАТОВОДНИХ

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

504.454:597.597.556.333.1

NEOGOBIUS MELANOSTOMUS (PALLAS, 1814)

. , *,

. , ,

. , **,

(Neogobius melanostomus

Pallas, 1814)

. , 22 .

(Gammaridae, Corophiidae), –

(Mytilaster lineatus, Abra ovata).

.

: , ,

.

Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) 60 . , , ,

, – , . 60- .

( , , ) ( ) , , . ),

[7, 8, 10, 11, 12].

* – . .** – .

2

, .

.

, )

,

.

.

,

,

.

.

, –

, (n = 45 .), .

(n = 23 .) ( . ) (n

= 9 .), ( . ) (n = 10 .) (

) (n = 5 .) ( . 1). – 2012–

2013 .

,

.

( )

[4, 6]. 92

, (SL) ( )

[3].

[1, 9].

3

. 1.

:

,

( , %):

,

– ,

; – ; –

, [2].

Microsoft Excel Access 2010, Statistica 7.0 (StatSoft, Inc.)

Primer 5.

.

,

Mollusca, Crustacea, Amphipoda, Chironomidae, Pisces.

. 2,5

(Cercopagis), 5 –

4

,

90% [5].

( . )

– 11,9 , – . (5,2 ) ( . 1). ,

,

.

1.

, , Min Max M±m min max M±m7,8 14,7 10,3±0,21 12,5 65,4 31,6±1,9

. 9,6 14,3 11,9±0,30 26,8 91,6 50,7±3,7. 4,0 6,4 5,2±0,27 1,1 5,9 3,3±0,6. 6,5 6,9 6,7±0,07 6,1 7,5 6,7±0,2

7,9 9,5 8,5±0,21 12,8 23,8 17,6±1,2

22

( . 2).

. ,

– Nereidae, – Gammarus

Corophium, – Rhithropanopeus harrisii, -

Chironomidae. ,

.

, Mytilaster lineatus

(10,4 .), (31,1 %).

Abra ovata,

.

(7,0 .), – (11,1 %).

Lentidium mediterraneum Cerastoderma glaucum,

M. lineatus A. ovata,

5

,

15,6 % 13,3 %.

Hydrobia, – 37,8 %,

, ,

15,6 % – Nereidae

.,

. , M. lineatus (27,6 .),

(95,7 %). C. glaucum 52,2 % .. ,

–Gammaridae (10 %) Corophiidae (100 %). Insecta

Chironomidae, 10 % .. . .

, Corophiidae (100 %) Gammaridae,

. – 40 %. D. polymorpha, 80 %

.

, – D. Polymorpha,

66,7%.

6

2. ,

. ).

. ).

) . )M±m lim M±m lim M±m lim M±m lim M±m lim

BivalviaAbra ovata (Philippi, 1836) 7,00±2,00 1,0-31,0 - - - - - - - -Cerastoderma glaucum (Poiret, 1789) 3,70±1,30 2,0-10,0 1,10±0,1 1,0-2,0 - - - - - -Lentidium mediterraneum (O.G. Costa, 1829) 5,40±0,70 1,0-12,0 3,30±0,70 1,0-7,0 - - - - - -Cerastoderma Poli, 1795 1,00±0,03 0-1,0 2,0±0,1 0-2,0 - - - - - -Cerastoderma umbonatum (Wood, 1850) 2,30±0,70 1,0-3,0 - - - - - - - -Mytilaster lineatus (Gmelin, 1791) 10,40±4,10 1,0-59,0 27,6±2,40 8,0-50,0 - - - - - -Parvicardium exiguum (Gmelin, 1791) - - 3,5±0,03 1,0-6,0 - - - - - -Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771) - - - - - - 1,33±0,1 1,0-3,0 1,5±0,21 1,0-2,0Mya arenaria (Linnaeus, 1758) 2,00±0,30 0,0-1,0 1,0±0,1 0-1,0 - - - - - -Bivalvia larvae 7,70±2,00 1,0-40,0 5,7±1,0 2,0-10,0 - - - - - -

GastropodaHydrobia spp. 11,60±3,60 1,0-45,0 9,40±2,0 1,0-77,0 - - - - - -Pseudopaludinella leneumicra (Bourguignat,1876) - - 1,5±0,3 1,0-4,0 - - - - - -

PolychaetaNereidae gen. sp . 1,00±0,03 0-1,0 1,0±0,03 0-1,0 - - - - - -

MystacocaridaOstracoda gen. sp. (Latreille,1802) 2,00±0,03 0-1,0 1,0±0,030 0-1,0 - - - - - -

DecapodaRhithropanopeus harrisii (Gould, 1841) - - 1,30±0,30 1,0-2,0 - - - - - -

InsectaLarvae Chironomidae 2,00±0,2 0 -2,0 - - 1,0±0,10 0-1,0 1,5±0,10 1,0-3,0 - -Insecta - - 1,0±0,10 0,0-1,0 - - - - - -

CirripediaBalanus improvisus (Darwin, 1854) 1,30±0,30 1,0-2,0 1,0±0,30 0-1,0 - - - - - -

AmphipodaGammarus sp. 1,00±0,30 0-1,0 - - 1,0±0,10 0,0-1,0 1,50±0,2 1,0-2,0 - -Corophium sp. - - - - 12,2±2,20 4,0-24,0 16,2±3,0 6,0-26,0 - -

ForaminiferaForaminifera gen. sp . 2,50±0,30 1,0-4,0 1,00±0,10 0-1,0 - - - - - -

ActinopterygiiAtherina pontica (Eichwald, 1831) 1,00±0,10 0-1,0 - - - - - - - -

7

,

– 30,9 – 40,7 %,

.

Amphipoda ( . 2).

. (Decapoda)

8,6 – 11,1 %.

(9,1 – 10,0%)

, ( . ) – 6,9 %.

(Cirripedia).

. 2.

,

, .

. ,

(

. ), . ( .

3).

8

3. , %

. ). ) )

- - - -

. ) 60 - - -

: ( . ) 0 20 - -

( ) 0 5,6 7,1 -

. ) 11,8 10,5 0 57,9

.

( . 3).

. 3.

.

. ,

.

1.

Bivalvia,

9

Gastropoda, Polychaeta, Mystacocarida, Decapoda, Insecta, Cirripedia, Amphipoda,

Foraminifera, Actinopterygii,

, . .

2.

, 15-16

, 3-4 ,

– .

3.

(60 %), – 57,9 % .

.

4.

.

1. ., ., .

/ . – : , 2011. – 171 .

2. Neogobius melanostomus

(Pallas) ( ) / .,

./ . // .

. – 2011. – 16, . 18 (25). – . 38–44.

3. . . / . – .:

, 1966. – 375 .

4. /

. . . – : , 1961. – 261 .

5. . . 40 . .8. . / . .

; , . . / . – .: , 1986. –

320 .

10

6. .

( , , ,

). / . – .: , 1952. – 268 .

7. First record of round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) in

the Sava River, Croatia / [M. Piria, N. Šprem, I. Jakovli and other] // Aquatic

Invasions. – 2011. – 6 (1). – . 153–157.

8. First record of the Round goby, Neogobius melanostomus

(Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Gobiidae) in Belgium / [H. Verreycken, J. Breine, J.

Snoeks and other] // Acta ichthyologica et piscatorial. – 2011. – 41 (2). – P. 137–140.

9. Grintsov V., Sezgin M. Manual for identification of Amphipoda from the

Black Sea / V. Grintsov – Sevastopol: 2011. – P. 151.

10. Gutowsky L.F.G. Intra-population variability of life-history traits and

growth during range expansion of the invasive round goby, Neogobius melanostomus

/ L.F.G. Gutowsky, M.G. Fox // Fisheries Management and Ecology. – 2012. – 19. –

P. 78–88.

11. Nolte A.W. Dispersal in the course of invasion / A.W. Nolte // Molecular

ecology. – 2011. – P. 20.

12. Ray W.J. Habitat and Site Affinity of the Round Goby 2001 Great Lakes

Res / W.J. Ray, L.D. Corkum // Department of Biological Sciences University of

Windsor. – 2001. – 27 (3). – . 329–334.

NEOGOBIUS MELANOSTOMUS (PALLAS, 1814)

. , . ,

(Neogobius melanostomusPallas, 1814)

. , 22.

(Gammaridae, Corophiidae), – (Mytilaster lineatus, Abra ovata).

.

11

: , ,.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUTRITION SPECTRUM OF ROUNGGOBY NEOGOBIUS MELANOSTOMUS (PALLAS, 1814) IN PONDS WITH

FRESH AND SALTY WATER.

V. Onoprienko, I. Mityay, M. TkachenkoStudied the nutrition spectrum of roung goby (Neogobius melanostomus

Pallas, 1814) in waters with varying salinity in central and southern regions ofUkraine. In his diet revealed organisms that belong to 22 taxons. The most importantnutrition objects of freshwater inhabitant are higher crustaceans (Gammaridae,Corophiidae), and bivalves (Mytilaster lineatus, Abra ovata) in salty water. Clusteranalysis of nutrition object's similarity has showed a clear dividing of the nutritionspectrum in these types of ponds.

Keywords: Nutrition spectrum, fresh and salt waters, species similarity index