Upload
independent
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Breen, H. & Hing, N. (online 28-02-14). Life course analysis of gambling trajectories: An Indigenous Australian study. International Gambling Studies.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14459795.2014.891636.
Life course analysis of gambling trajectories: An Indigenous Australian study
Abstract
Traditional card gambling is a culturally acceptable recreational activity for generations of
Indigenous Australians. Commercial gambling activities are popular as well. This study drew
on a life course approach and a sample of 57 Indigenous Australian people to examine their
gambling trajectories over time that resulted in recreational gambling or in disordered
gambling. To gain in-depth insight into various gambling trajectories, this study used an
interpretative phenomenological methodology. At early childhood, teenage, young adult and
mature adult stages, major gambling influences appeared as dependence, independence,
timing of major shifts and transitions, and rationalisation, respectively. The study showed that
being a recreational or disordered gambler was a shifting or fluctuating position, subject to
transitions and events in people’s lives rather than a one-way path in either direction. Within
a complex cultural environment, the dynamic interplay between social density, context and
individual choice appear to influence gambling trajectories for these Indigenous Australians.
Introduction
A life course approach is an interdisciplinary framework increasingly used to guide social
science research into human behaviour (Elder, 1994; Wingens, de Valk, Windzio, & Aybek,
2011). Life course analysis charts the trajectory of life between childhood and adult
circumstances (Friedli, 2009), studying the long term effects of the dynamic interplay of
societal structuring and individual agency over the course of people’s lives (Elder & Giele,
2
2009). Societal structures (e.g., norms around age, family, community, work, leisure)
influence the formation of social pathways through which human agency (individual choices,
actions, resources) creates life course patterns over time (Wingens et al., 2011). Life course
studies stress critical points of transition (e.g., early socialisation, reaching adulthood, work,
retirement) which influence and are influenced by emotional, cognitive and social
development.
Use of the life course approach for gambling research is unusual except for crime
analyses (Moffitt, Caspi, Harrington, & Milne, 2002; Nagin, Farrington, & Moffitt, 1995;
Sampson & Laub, 1990). However, two quantitative studies (Slutske, Jackson, & Sher, 2003;
Slutske, Blaszczynski, & Martin, 2009) found problem gambling to be more transitory and
episodic than enduring and chronic. A qualitative exception (Reith & Dobbie, 2011)
concentrating on gambling beginnings revealed social networks and environmental context
were important in initiation of gambling.
Investigations involving life course analysis with Indigenous people are rare apart
from policy analyses (Biddle & Yapp, 2010; Cooke & McWhirter, 2011) and disease
research (Sayers, Mackerras, Singh, Bucens, Flynn, & Reid, 2003). Research into gambling
by Indigenous people has mainly centred on public health analysis of gambling impacts
(SHORE and Whariki, 2008; Smith, Currie & Battle, 2011; Stevens & Bailie, 2012),
gambling behaviour, risk and protective factors, consequences and help-seeking (Breen,
2012; Breen, Hing, & Gordon, 2011; Hing, Breen, Gordon, & Russell, 2013a, 2013b in press)
and gambling-related problems (Alegría, Petry, Hasin, Liu, Grant, & Blanco, 2009; Ministry
of Health, 2009; Stevens & Young, 2009; Williams, Stevens, & Nixon, 2011). International
and national findings indicate that some Indigenous people have historical gambling
antecedents. Thus, they may be more accepting of gambling activities and potentially more
vulnerable to gambling-related problems than general populations. As original people of
3
Australia, but now comprising only 2.5% of the population (Australian Bureau of Statistics
[ABS], 2012), Indigenous Australians live within two societal structures, Indigenous and
non-Indigenous. This duality has implications for their life course patterns. Similar to
international Indigenous experiences (United Nations, 2008), Indigenous Australians usually
live with social, economic and health conditions below those of the general Australian
population (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW], 2011). Culturally,
maintaining collective well-being and reciprocal obligations is as holistically important as
individual welfare (Atkinson, 2002). Hence, ripple effects of beneficial and/or harmful events
affecting Indigenous Australians spread extensively through kin networks and communities
(Atkinson, 2002; Langton, 1981). Explaining the cumulative effects of gambling embedded
in complex societal and collective cultural structures (Phillips, 2003) requires a dynamic
approach, one that a life course study suggests. Thus, theoretically framed and empirically
based information on life course dynamics (Kuh, Ben-Shlomo, Lynch, Hallqvist, & Power,
2003) should provide knowledge critical for understanding Indigenous gambling at various
life stages and transitions. As the first qualitative investigation of Indigenous Australian
gambling using life course theory and analysis, these results could potentially increase
individual and community safeguards and/or reduce harms associated with gambling.
This paper aims to link the sociological life course approach to gambling by
Indigenous Australians in analysing gambling trajectories from childhood to older adulthood.
Further, it examines transitions resulting in controlled or recreational gambling and
uncontrolled or disordered gambling.
Literature review
The life course approach ‘is sensitive to the consequences of early transitions for later
experiences and events’ (Elder, 1994, p. 5). Effects of early choices lead to a core premise of
4
life course analysis that developmental processes and outcomes are shaped by social
trajectories people follow (Elder, 1994). Our analysis examines interconnections between
long-term age-graded trajectories (e.g., family histories) subjected to changing environments
or short-term transitions (e.g., turning 18 years, becoming an adult and legally allowed to
gamble) (Wingens et al., 2011). Transitions are often seen as point-like events embedded in
trajectories, while trajectories are longer phases within a person’s life (Elder, 1998).
Four concepts are crucial for understanding sequential age-related human
development and adaptation (Elder, 1994; Elder & Giele, 2009; Wingens et al., 2011). The
interplay between human lives and historical context considers issues surrounding
communities and time periods where individuals live and mature. Historical forces and social
conditions (institutional structures, economic conditions, race relations) are major influences
on a person’s life course (Csizmadia, Brunsma, & Cooney, 2012; Elder, 1998). For instance,
horse racing has influenced generations of Indigenous families, many of whom worked on
pastoral stations, rode, trained and race horses, and met up with family and kin at racetracks
(Breen, 2013). Social embeddedness or linked lives is founded on life cycle sequences
including intergenerational ties, cultural, social and peer influences. Interdependence assumes
that individuals are linked through relationships (Li, Stanton, & Feigelman, 2000; Liefbroer
& Elzinga, 2012). For example, with some First Nation groups, traditional gambling has been
and still remains embedded in community spiritual and secular life (Belanger, 2006). Timing
of life events or transitions can vary compared to others and normative expectations.
Temporal age-graded perspectives influence social roles and events (Elder, 1994), with
consequences that can alter adaptation (Elder & Giele, 2009). Life expectancy for Indigenous
Australians is lower than for the national population (AIHW, 2011) so Elders and older
family members may not survive to provide assistance and advice. Human agency or choice
is the construction process where people choose roles and situations for themselves within
5
resource opportunities and constraints (Elder & Giele, 2009). Thus, some people choose to
gamble and others do not. Associations between social regulation and human agency
underpin many important transitions in life course research. These concepts have been
fruitful in life course analyses of alcohol use (Neve, Lemmens, & Drop, 2000), adolescent
risk (Li et al., 2000), intergenerational behaviour (Liefbroer & Elzinga, 2012), leisure (Deem
1986; Gibson, Berdychevsky, & Bell, 2012), motherhood (Bialeschki & Michener, 1994),
and race relations (Csizmadia et al., 2012), among others. In adopting a life course approach
here, we build on this philosophy and expand knowledge about key influences shaping
Indigenous gambling in Australia.
Gambling has been a common recreational activity for Indigenous people over a very
long time (Belanger, 2006; Goodale, 1987). Indigenous Australian gambling is characterised
by access to unregulated traditional card games at home and to regulated commercial
gambling in venues (Breen et al., 2011; Stevens & Young, 2009). Despite a long history of
traditional card gambling, recent research shows higher proportions of Indigenous men and
women prefer commercial gambling, especially when readily accessible (Christie &
Greatorex, 2009; Hing et al., 2013b). Gambling on both forms is generally motivated by
wanting to win money, to socialise with family and friends, and less commonly to escape
from stress and problems (Breen et al., 2011). Traditional card games are a culturally
constituted practice maintained because they satisfy needs associated with autonomy, status,
reciprocity and maintenance of kin relationships (Breen & Gainsbury, 2013; Phillips, 2003).
These values are not obvious in commercial gambling (Christie & Greatorex, 2009). As in
many population groups, a small proportion of Indigenous Australians experience gambling-
related problems (Hing et al., 2013a; Stevens & Bailie, 2012). This study examines the
influences of life course and gambling transitions that result in recreational or disordered
gambling trajectories for Indigenous Australians.
6
Method
This qualitative investigation is situated within an interpretive paradigm using a social
constructivist approach which includes analyses of texts, events and behaviour to find
meanings (Guba & Lincoln, 1989). The interpretive paradigm centres on an empathetic
understanding of the reality of the human situation created as people respond to, interpret and
make sense of their lives (Gubrium & Holstein, 2000; Schwant, 2003). This research design
sought to provide richly layered, in-depth information about participants’ gambling
experiences. Qualitative methods are seen as culturally appropriate for Indigenous
Australians by Indigenous researchers Atkinson (2002), Martin (2008) and Phillips (2003).
Martin (2003, p. 5) argues that a qualitative approach, including phenomenology, ‘gives
emphasis to the lived realities of the researched and expects particular levels of engagement
by the researcher that extends beyond cultural relativism’.
Phenomenology is considered suitable for research with minority groups (Smith,
Flowers, & Larkin, 2009). Phenomenology is the study of shared meanings of experiences of
a phenomenon for a range of people (Creswell, 2007). It involves understanding how
participants perceive and recall an event (Smith & Osborn, 2008). Phenomenology seeks to
give participants a voice (capturing and reflecting their claims and concerns) and make sense
of their responses (interpreting their material grounded in their accounts) (Larkin, Watts, &
Clifton, 2006). For research into shifting behavioural trajectories based on transitions in
timing, choices, interdependence and social forces (Elder, 1994), phenomenology appears
appropriate to describe and analyse participants’ shared gambling experiences.
Phenomenology enables data interpretation and reduction to find the crux of participants’
experiences.
7
People identifying as Indigenous Australian and of legal age to gamble (18 years+)
were sought as study participants. We generated a database of names and telephone numbers
for over 250 Indigenous Australian adults from past gambling surveys. All had agreed to
participate in future projects. Most of these people lived either in rural Indigenous
communities, in the general community in regional towns or in metropolitan areas of New
South Wales and Queensland with a few living in Victoria. We drew a name randomly to
commence sample selection. To gain an even spread throughout the database, we chose every
third name. If a phone was not working, we moved to the next number with sample selection
re-starting. We interviewed 57 Indigenous Australians after six refusals. Participants were
aged 18-71 years with most being 31-65 years, as shown in Table 1.
Insert Table 1 about here
Table 2 summarises whether participants had been exposed to gambling in their
environment or engaged in gambling activities themselves by age group and gender.
Insert Table 2 about here
Sensitivity is important when undertaking research with small population groups.
Indigenous Australians have experienced dispossession, disadvantage and marginalisation
since British colonisation (Atkinson, 2002). Exploitation from past Indigenous research has
resulted in some mistrust of researchers (Martin, 2008). Therefore, we obtained ethics
approval from the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council (760/10) to ensure
adherence to cultural and ethical principles. Ethics approval was also obtained from a
University Human Research Ethics Committee (ECN-11-244).
All potential participants were telephoned and asked to participate in a telephone
interview about their lifetime gambling history. With agreement we posted out a plain-
English information package explaining the research aims, guiding questions, some
gambling-help information and consent form. A subsequent phone call established mutually
8
agreeable interview times. Consent forms were signed, including permission to record
interviews. For cultural sensitivity and consistency, all interviews were conducted by one
Indigenous Australian. The interviewer, who had similar research experience with other
organisations, had been recruited and trained for research work with our team on a previous
project. The interviewer was trained and capable of discussing any issues arising in the
interviews. Training consisted of familiarisation with interview protocols (e.g., retaining
participant anonymity, providing gambling help information if requested, helping participants
claim their reimbursement a $20.00 shopping voucher), discussing the intent of each
question, suggested probing questions, and monitoring of initial interviews. The interviewer
was not known to participants and obtaining interview participation from nearly equal
numbers of males and females, and across a wide age span, suggests the interviewer’s gender
and age were not problematic for participants.
Semi-structured interviews were undertaken in 2012, each lasting about 30 minutes.
Guiding questions asked participants whether and how they had been exposed to gambling as
a child and to describe their gambling, if any, at four broad chronological age-related periods.
For each period, participants were asked what influenced them to gamble or not, and
consequences of that gambling. This approach captured a retrospective yet meaningful view
of the temporal rhythm of their lives, including transitions, impacts of key events and
changing circumstances of gambling trajectories. Participants appeared to clearly recall many
important experiences associated with gambling events. With reliance on early memories,
positive bias and post-hoc rationalisation may arise. Following Reith and Dobbie (2011), we
checked interviews for inconsistencies, thus reducing some limitations. A professional
service transcribed the interviews verbatim, contributing to data validity. Listening to
recordings and reading transcripts simultaneously assisted with these checks as well as
interpretation. No issues were raised about interviews on ethical grounds.
9
Data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) (Smith et
al., 2009; Smith & Osborn, 2008) to gain an insider perspective of how people make sense of
their lifetime gambling experiences. Thus, IPA is inductive, driven by data (Braun & Clark,
2006), and is concerned with identifying and exploring what matters to participants (Larkin et
al., 2006). A challenge is to reduce large amounts of raw data to find the essence of what they
reveal (Patton, 2002).
The first stage of analysis was to read and reread transcripts to identify themes that
characterised responses to each interview section. Emerging themes were reflected on and
considered in relation to one another. Some themes formed naturally into groups of shared
meanings. Secondly, themes were integrated across participant transcripts to identify shared
key themes, which were pulled together to form overarching meaningful master themes.
Master themes capture the quality of participants’ shared experience of the phenomenon
under investigation (Smith & Osborn, 2008). Cultural cross-checks (Echtner & Prasad, 2003)
included reviewing groups of shared meanings and themes by an independent researcher.
Particular attention was paid to transitions and consequences. Audio files were reviewed to
ensure speakers’ words and tones were interpreted to convey intended meaning. For example,
depending on the speaker’s tone the word ‘addiction’ has context added in the results to
convey intended positive or negative meanings (Glasser, 1976). As suggested by Raento and
Meuronen (2012), controls such as these assist with interpretation. Data analysis was
supported by NVivo software. This program helped us manage (store and share) data, with
analysis, grouping of themes and review by others. The analysis process was independently
audited to assess evidence links from interview transcripts to final master themes (Smith et
al., 2009). Efforts to maximise reliability (trustworthiness of the data) and validity
(trustworthiness of interpretations) were made (Stiles, 1993).
10
Results and Discussion
Gambling pathways described by participants were analysed with reference to four life stages
and guided theoretically by the life course approach. Master themes linked with each age
group include dependence, growing independence, timing of major shifts and rationalisation,
respectively. Themes are explained and illustrated with participant quotations, tagged with
their age in years and gender (M = male; F = female).
Early childhood exposure to gambling (under 13 years) – dependence and social
linkages within family and kin networks
Maintaining close family and kin networks and depending on others were closely linked to
early childhood gambling exposure. Most participants (46) recalled gambling as part of
childhood memories, including horse racing, traditional card playing, poker machine
gambling, bingo, greyhound racing, scratch tickets, lotto, lottery, bingo and cock fighting, in
that order.
From necessity, young children depend on their families for almost everything.
Family socioeconomic characteristics affect children through household routines and
practices. Atkinson (2002) argues that kinship networks and relationships are created and
maintained through nurturing of multiple connections between generations of extended
Indigenous families. The density of such networks often indicates the degree of mutually
beneficial cooperation between people (Putnam, 2000) with strong or weak social cohesion
the result. Strong physical, social and cultural networks were recalled by one participant who
explained her family’s substantial involvement in owing, training and racing greyhounds:
A lot of family members were actually involved with greyhound racing … I can
remember as a child my father had greyhounds, my uncle had greyhounds, another
11
uncle had greyhounds so we would always be taken to the greyhound race track
(F52).
Implicit reliance on prize money and winning bets was anticipated for animal upkeep
and family income. For this family network, regular gatherings and passing on information
and knowledge about greyhounds was a normal, acceptable shared pastime. Although this
participant rarely gambled now, she was concerned that one family member described as
‘addicted’ (F52) gambled in isolation. Gambling solo sometimes signals problems and
potentially weakens bonds within groups.
Likewise, another participant recollected watching and learning gambling in family
homes:
I used to go to bingo with my grandmother quite often and that was at a gambling
school so it wasn’t like a club or anything. It was just in the backyard. And we used to
have a lot of card games at the table just at home (F27).
As an adult, this person sometimes gambles on bingo and cards but her commercial
gambling is limited by substantial effort required to earn a living: ‘I work too hard to press it
… can’t put it into a machine and waste it’ (F27). From these reminiscences, feelings of
belonging and social embeddedness were reported as being linked to an awareness of the
rules and rituals of gambling. These families, as micro-social groups within a macro-social
context, shared a cultural history of gambling that extended over time and space.
For others, intergenerational emotional and physical stability was important. A
grandfather was the father figure in one participant’s life who described their common
gambling connection: ‘… Melbourne Cup … when I was really young. My grandfather used
12
to put fifty cents on a horse and that’s all I’ve done’ (M38). This grandfather provided close
family support and a stable role model that most likely satisfied the participant’s emotional
regulation. As a non-gambler now, this participant continued describing his childhood
exposure to gambling: ‘I grew up with my mother and … friends … really bad gamblers so I
kind of learned the hard way … through other peoples’ eyes … so I didn’t make the same
mistakes’ (M38), and further:
It was the … dreaded poker machines. Not really any horse racing no … My
grandfather … he’d have $5 … for the Saturday races … On my mother’s side … a
few of them big on poker machines and cards, just money spills (M38).
The quality of these different relationships in the reproduction of his grandfather’s
behaviour and attitudes rather than his mother’s, reflects an important generational
transmission of cultural capital (Bourdieu, 1989; Liefbroer & Elzinga, 2012; Reith & Dobbie,
2011). Important transitions appear to be steered by life course trajectories where Indigenous
adults stepped into caring roles left unfilled by others.
Childhood gambling pathways (exposure to and awareness of traditional gambling,
plus some engagement in gambling themselves) were forged early in their life course and
heavily influenced by societal structures (collective family activities and culturally based
reciprocity). Young people absorb values, attitudes and behaviour from important social
agents at critical stages of development.
Teenager (13-17 years) – growing independence and human agency
Growing independence marks teenage years as teens experience enormous change and
transition in their physical and social environment. Within situational constraints, choices
13
teenagers make contribute to their life course. Being unlawful to gamble under 18 years,
when asked if they gambled then, most (35) said ‘no’.
Non-gamblers were just not interested, too poor to risk limited resources or adhered to
the law and family rules. Recognizing this scarcity, one participant recounted: ‘I’m one of 10
children from a single income family. There wasn’t a lot of money to be spread around’
(M45). Another did not want to break the law or strict matriarchal rules: ‘We weren’t allowed
to gamble … if our grandma found out we got in trouble’ (F29). A different participant had
seen negative effects from adults gambling excessively and wanted to avoid similar
consequences:
I certainly saw people who had their backside out of their pants and I saw other
people that certainly lived high on the hog from it … tell you the wins they had but
they wouldn’t actually divulge how much they lost (M48).
Thus, age-graded expectations, legal and family constraints, poverty and experience
of gambling events affected some teen decisions to not gamble. The cost of gambling and its
potential consequences outweighed gambling benefits for this group.
In contrast, those who gambled preferred horse racing followed by Indigenous card
games. Both gambling forms were accessible in family homes and with peers. Wagering on
horse races ranged from yearly to twice weekly, with reported weekly expenditure from $1-
$100. Gambling motivations included socialising, pressure from peers and influential older
friends, and reinforcement from working in the racing industry. Those gambling annually on
the Melbourne Cup generally did this with extended family and peers for small bets.
Participants said they enjoyed the collective company of other Indigenous people and trying
luck.
14
Risk-taking behaviour often increases during transition to young adulthood (Li et al.,
2000). Seeking extra money, one participant became an informal bookmaker. He took bets
from school friends because he worked casually at the races and had comprehensive
knowledge about horses and track conditions. He did well financially for a year, ‘it was just a
bit of fun’ (M53). Currently, he spends $70-80 each month at country race meetings. But
teenage wagering also resulted in financial losses, nutritional deficiency and subsequent
health difficulties brought about by naivety. A participant who gambled weekly on horse
races with teenage friends, spending $80-130 each session, observed that ‘peer pressure’
(M54) was a forceful influence:
I didn’t win a lot … I struggled even from week to week to get to work. That would
have been a negative. Sometimes I had to do without lunch. But the positive was, I
still had my mates (M54).
Teenagers may engage in adult activities such as drinking alcohol to demonstrate
independence and social bravado (Neve et al., 2000). Peers begin to exert more pressure as
primary socialising agents potentially influencing gambling decisions and life course
trajectories.
Traditional Indigenous card games were accessible and acceptable. Teenagers learned
these games by watching family and friends play at home. Amounts gambled varied from $2-
$100, with frequency ranging from quarterly to three or four times per week. Socialising with
peers motivated card gambling. Positive outcomes were explained as money staying within a
circle of familiar people, winning, building better relationships and support within the
Indigenous community. Negative outcomes were perceived as teens being too young to
gamble and going ‘too far’ (F28), opening themselves to harmful effects. Two participants
15
commencing gambling with similar histories experienced contrasting life course pathways.
The first explained:
I think it was good for us to all get together and the fact that we were gambling at a
table meant that somebody … was going to leave with the money and not a club or a
venue. I’d say that would be the benefit. On the other hand, the negatives would be
you’re kind of pre-exposed to gambling. I suppose in my case it wasn’t too bad for me
but I know a couple of my other friends are good gamblers now [laughs]. It probably
didn’t have a real good effect on them (F28).
Although her tone was humorous, adverse gambling outcomes were implied for these
friends and advice offered: ‘if it’s only in moderation it can be a good thing … a social thing’
(F28). The second participant who had experienced gambling-related problems and now
gambles with a limit of $40 per month recalled:
In my youth it was positive … the women used to get together and support each other.
No matter who lost or won money [on cards] … they could count on … a loan until
next week … but it became negative during my adult life where … the women were
going into town, pokie machines had been introduced to us. So with me … when I
started going to the clubs … I got into the pokies and I became very addicted (F46).
Her tone altered from happy to sad describing her losses. Later in a more positive tone
she explained money and time limits she now uses to restrict gambling. One important
contextual difference between these two participants was the second person (F46) moving
from card to commercial gambling. Her gambling in the new setting, a venue, appeared
16
similar to her card gambling at home which was steeped in historical patterns of collective
life. But these two gambling forms have different goals. Commercial gambling aims to make
profits for the operator. In contrast Indigenous card gambling is an everyday leisure activity
that usually sustains social relationships and cultural norms (Breen & Gainsbury, 2013;
Christie & Greatorex, 2009). Thus, a carry-over of historical attitudes, cultural values and
behaviour into a commercial context caught some people unaware of potentially extensive
negative outcomes from newer forms of gambling.
Home boundaries weaken as teenagers become more mobile, independent, seeking
social bonds with peers. Peer pressure associated with youthful gambling can motivate
teenagers to act in opposition to family, social and cultural expectations (Delfabbro, King, &
Griffiths, 2013). While not legally old enough to gamble on commercial forms, gambling
decisions of some teens here were experimental and risky. Indigenous teenagers, as a
minority group living in dual worlds, may feel the need for strong friendship and collective
bonds of safety with Indigenous peers due to their low numbers and generally disadvantaged
social circumstances. In this sensitive teenage period of rapid individual change, exposure to
risk and risky behaviour has stronger effects on development than at other age periods (Elder,
1994; Kuh et al., 2003; Li et al., 2000). In contrast to findings by Slutske et al. (2003), higher
gambling risks and disordered gambling here appear developmental rather than due to a
cohort effect. Individual variation in vulnerability to gambling’s attraction and intensity of
peer group pressure seem greater here than for other age groups and social networks.
Young adult (18-30 years) –timing of major shifts and transitions
Timing of major shifts, transitions and events is a key feature of life course analysis and a
master theme for this young adult group. Changing activities, growing independence and
expansion of people’s identity are reflected in the timing of important life transitions, such as
17
moving out of home, getting a job, marrying and having children (Elder, 1994). On turning
18, legalised gambling and alcohol consumption may become rites of passage, initiation into
the adult world (Reith & Dobbie, 2011). After an initial ‘honeymoon’ with gambling and
some early high risk behaviour, participants matured as major shifts and other important life
events occurred. As initial interest waned, participants experienced turning points and entered
a transition period, often reducing gambling in a maturing out process (Slutske et al., 2003).
Most participants (47) engaged in gambling during this period. Poker machine
gambling followed by wagering on horse races were prominent activities. In descending
order, other preferences were lottery products, traditional card games, bingo, sports betting,
casino games, greyhound racing and keno. Gambling motivations were reported as wanting to
socialise, win money, peer pressure and escaping from stress. Explaining some of these
motivations, one woman when asked about turning 18 said: ‘… my friends … people I hung
around with … I would see them winning … influenced me to play’ (F26). Now aged 26, her
life has changed and priorities shifted as she has young children. She observed:
… the positive thing I look at is my kids, the things that they’ve got is not from me
gambling … a lot of people out there just gamble … they don’t buy anything … it is a
positive … what I do for my kids (F26).
Over time, family welfare priorities saw her transition from conforming to peer
pressure (social regulation) to rarely gambling now (individual agency).
Allowing for variations, participants began gambling in venues seemingly as a rite of
passage, often weekly or fortnightly. They spent approximately $30 each session (range: $1-
$700, the highest for all age groups in the sample. Positive consequences were reported as
socialising, relationship building and fun. Negative consequences affecting a minority were
18
reported as ripple effects associated with losses, guilt and deprived families. For one
participant, adventurous gambling beginning as a rite of passage became problematic:
As I turned 18 I started to gamble a lot of money, I’d have a few beers and I’d
sometimes spend all my pay on gambling … so I stopped at 22 years … I would
spend then … about $400 on poker machines every fortnight. I don’t spend that much
now (M31).
He continued: I still play the poker machines ... I usually put in about $10-20. If I
don’t win, I just leave it’ (M31). Although this man was motivated at 18 years by ‘the
thought of winning and getting more money’, his high gambling losses and ensuing poverty
eventually left him depressed. He was unable to socialise, could not pay rent and obtained
loans to reduce financial difficulties (M31). His initial access to gambling evolved from
uncontrolled to controlled gambling, showing distinct transition from experimentation and
risk towards maturity and mindfulness. His recovery demonstrated a shift in perception and
practice about managing gambling as a recreation activity.
For many in this age group, access to commercial gambling was initially an exciting
addition to social activities, something to be explored especially with peers. But the
importance of social environments and access to gambling in physical venues, factors
emphasised as giving meaning to the experience of gambling (Reith & Dobbie, 2011),
reduced with time. Most underwent major lifetime shifts (starting relationships, marriage,
children, responsibilities). Their priorities changed. They gradually transitioned from high to
more moderate levels of gambling. In parallel, peer networks declined with a strengthening of
family relationships. Apart from a few participants who continued a trajectory of disordered
gambling, some ceased gambling while others gambled within set limits, despite still feeling
19
tested when visiting gambling venues. These findings contribute to debate about disordered
gambling progressing only in a worsening linear direction (Slutske, 2006; Slutske et al.,
2009).
Mature adult (31-65 years and over) – rationalisation and the interplay of human life
and history
A master theme for this group of mature adults was rationalisation of gambling. Although
one large group of participants gambled weekly or fortnightly spending about $10-50 per
session, discretionary gambling expenditure was usually related to income level.
As a sequential dynamic, life course analysis involves an accumulation of historical
experiences interwoven with events and transitions that influence a great variety of
behaviours (Elder, 1994; 1998). Events and transitions in this research produced mobility in
and out of gambling. While three people in this group had never gambled and 11 continued
gambling the same as they had in younger years, most participants selected alternative
gambling paths to those followed previously. Their choices were based on economic, social
and cultural opportunities and constraints faced at the time.
Rational judgements were made about the odds of winning on poker machines. Seven
people decreased poker machine gambling but still gambled on horses, poker and bingo.
Changing family circumstances usually underpinned these decisions. As one person grew
older, she felt a growing and timely need for solidarity with kinfolk: ‘I like spending more
time with my family … family tragedies and disasters … just brought me close to family’
(F33). Typical of decisions made within dynamic family and cultural contexts, one person
rationalised his transition away from poker machine gambling as:
20
I had to give them away … Last time I played the pokies was when one of my cousins
had a heart attack … I pulled [out] another $80-$100 for the pokies and then I said
that’s it, no more … I’m not playing these ever again … going to possibly ruin me …
I don’t go near a poker machine room … I’m not attracted by the sound anymore … I
was down at the club this afternoon … have a couple of beers and have a couple of
bets ... just a flutter … now watch your kids play footy and coach … that’s what it’s
all about anyway (M46).
These actions represent the creation and building of socially cohesive communities
(Putnam, 2000). Beneficial interplay between collective family values, timing of health
crises, family disaster impacts and growing children’s needs spurred some participants to
reduce gambling.
Some regular gamblers stopped gambling as they aged for internal (developing deep
religious faith, commencing or ending a relationship) and external reasons (jailed for
gambling-related crime, imposed gambling limits). These participants were influenced
differentially by life experiences with gambling. One person, whose spouse gambled heavily
eventually leading to marriage breakdown, said she stopped: ‘because of my faith’ (F34).
Another reported very grave legal consequences:
Poker machines … I don’t play them at all now but before, everyday … bit of
boredom, a bit of depression, stress … I had to do four years jail. I’ve been out for six
months … I know it’s addictive … if I go into a hotel I just don’t go into that area …
distance myself … if I just put a little bit in I know I’ll start chasing … then it just
gets bigger … and you start doing illegal activity again and then … boom … your
kids are more important (F39).
21
This appeared to be an emotional statement from the tone of her voice. Care of
children, family and extended family is a key feature of Indigenous Australian culture
(Martin, 2008). These values were re-awakened in her and others after experiencing harmful
gambling effects. While not typical, these participants rationalised their decisions to prevent
re-occurrence of gambling-related problems and the dislocation it caused.
In contrast, some women increased gambling as a transition to freedom, taking time
for themselves and relinquishing the ethic of care as older adulthood approached, a finding
supported by Breen et al. (2011). For three women, children had left home; for one, her frail
husband passed away; while another person experienced divorce. As culturally acceptable
recreation, one participant justified gambling commencement with:
I didn’t have the responsibility as all the kids had grown up and left home. So I had
more money to lose or take a risk with … I could afford it … boredom, something to
do, something to create a bit of an adrenalin rush and also other people would be
gambling. … you tend to go with the flow (F63).
An older widow explained her gambling trajectory beginning as entertainment with
her husband early in marriage but escalating with grief and loneliness after his death. She
ceased gambling recently after obtaining formal help:
I felt guilty because I’d put him in the nursing home … as soon as I got my pension
… I’d be going to pokies … cause a lot of problems in my family because I would
spend every cent … I’d have to go and get food orders and help with electricity …
daughter said that I had a gambling problem and I needed to talk to somebody … I
22
spoke to … Gamblers Anonymous. And I did have a problem but it took me a while
to realise (F71).
Declining social networks within minority groups may have more powerful effects on
those remaining due to fewer numbers and associated physical, social and cultural losses.
However, gambling in venues to escape loss and loneliness can create a trap as little social
interaction occurs (Brown & Coventry, 1997; Holdsworth, Nuske, & Breen, 2013). The need
to feel socially included can be strong.
Contextual elements of society and history affect processes of aging and loss. The
dynamics of mature adult life can be as powerful and transitory as in younger years. For
instance, two participants had sought formal assistance and several used self-help and family
assistance to reduce their gambling. The interplay between different forms of help evolved
over time. One person’s strategy, with the help of her husband, was: ‘I got them to take out
direct debit from my account … that way my mortgage was paid ... I did gamble but it wasn’t
as much’ (F56). Another person rationalised self-help strategies by limiting money and
finding work: ‘I just take $30 with me … no key cards … I also paint for a living … I haven’t
got enough time to be at the club … keep busy’ (M33). Finding long-term solutions for
recovery was an important gambling transition. It meant moving from a disordered struggle
to some limited yet controlled recreational gambling. Realisation that life needed to
dramatically change was a turning point preceding this transition. A few people sought
formal gambling help. However, more people used self-help to control, reduce or cease their
gambling, experiencing ‘natural recovery’ (Hodgins & el-Guebaly, 2000; Shaffer & Hall,
2002; Slutske et al., 2009).
Thus, combining these major conceptual influences (dependence, independence,
major shifts and rationalisations) as they appeared in participants’ life course, their gambling
23
trajectories are represented in Figure 1. The dotted lines represent dynamic movements and
influences moving back and forth between participants’ gambling trajectories, and their
cultural values, environment, history, social norms, kinship and socialisation. The aim of
Figure 1 is not to reduce the complex nature of gambling by Indigenous Australians to an
inactive or stable process, but to show flexibility within this social phenomenon.
Insert Figure 1 about here
Conclusions
Being a gambler in this group of participants, either recreational or disordered, was
dynamic, often depending on density of social networks, changing contextual circumstances
and individual actions. Participants’ gambling was volatile and fluid, subject to transitions
and turning points. For instance, a recreational gambler may evolve into a disordered
gambler, experience some level of recovery and regain their recreational status. As such,
these findings concur with Slutske et al. (2003), that life course histories of gambling
involving gambling-related problems are more frequently transitory and episodic than stable
and constant.
Although sharing similar family backgrounds and initiation into card gambling, two
crucial differences between recreational and disordered gamblers were strength of social
cohesion and transmission of gambling values in different contexts. Dense social bonds
among family groups usually indicated a pattern of recreational gambling within that
network. Where social bonds were weaker and people became isolated, a pattern of
disordered gambling was more likely. However for teenagers, strong peer bonds were often
associated with more disordered gambling within a general pattern of risky behaviour and
growing independence.
24
Additionally, transmission of gambling values, attitudes and behaviours from card
gambling within a homely kin context to commercial gambling within a market context
appeared to confuse some participants. These participants seemed to hold similar gambling
expectations for both contexts and gambled in a more disordered way on commercial
gambling. This difference was obvious in the teen and young adult groups (13-30 years).
These results align with others suggesting that natural recovery from gambling
problems may be the rule not exception (Hodgins & el-Guebaly, 2000; Slutske et al., 2009).
They display the ebb and flow of Indigenous gambling involvement, experiences of
recreational and disordered gambling, and efforts people make to overcome disordered
gambling. Transitions found here reflect and confirm changing patterns of gambling
involvement over time (Delfabbro et al., 2013; Shaffer & Hall, 2002). These results provide
new information and deeper understanding about gambling involvement by Indigenous
Australians and simultaneously support more general research findings on gambling histories.
Thus, these findings have implications for more intensive use of the gambling continuum and
transitions between different gambler groups. From a practical stance, public health policies
could be specifically targeted at gambling transitions to develop protective interventions at
discrete points. Input from local Indigenous justice groups, men’s and women’s groups and
similar organisations should increase effectiveness.
Using sociological life course analysis to examine Indigenous gambling was an
innovative approach, enhancing theoretical understanding of gambling trajectories and
transitions associated with recreational and disordered gambling. Methodologically, this
study has revealed unique systematically-derived knowledge about Indigenous gambling
demonstrating the utility of life course analysis for gambling research. It has provided a
foundation for further gambling research with small and sometimes hard to find population
25
groups. It may facilitate further investigation into general risk topics, particularly those
focused on links between social density, context and individual actions over time.
Limitations implicit in this study include a non-representative, self-selected sample
with just the participant’s name, age, gender and phone number recorded. Information on
participants’ location might have facilitated comparison of gambling preferences and
behaviour by place. The importance of place and context (Reith & Dobbie, 2011) may alter
for future investigations into intergenerational transmission trends as technologically
advanced gambling forms become more popular.
This research has demonstrated numerous dynamic life course trajectories for these
Indigenous Australian participants, revealing transitions and fluctuations in both recreational
and disordered gambling throughout their life course. These transitions and fluctuations have
been reported as being much more common than any persistent disordered one-directional
gambling pattern. This research emphasises that these transitions vary with social support,
contextual change and personal choice. This study points to the value of sociological research
using the life course approach and to the need for theory formulation across cultural and
behavioural boundaries for gambling.
References
Alegría, A., Petry, N., Hasin, D., Liu, S-M., Grant, B., & Blanco, C. (2009). Disordered
gambling among racial and ethnic groups in the US: Results from the National
Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. CNS Spectrums, 14(3),
132-142.
Atkinson, J. (2002). Trauma trails recreating songlines: The transgenerational effects of
trauma in Indigenous Australia. Melbourne: Spinifex Press.
26
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2012). Census of population and housing - counts of
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, 2011: Cat. no.2075.0. Canberra:
Author.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2011). The health and welfare of
Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, an overview: Cat. no. IHW
42. Canberra: Author.
Belanger, Y. (2006). Gambling with the future: The evolution of Aboriginal Gaming in
Canada. Saskatoon, SK: Purich Publishing Ltd.
Bialeschki, M., & Michener, S. (1994). Re-entering leisure: Transition within the role of
motherhood. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(1), 57-74.
Biddle, N., & Yapp, M. (2010). Demographic and socioeconomic outcomes across the
indigenous Australian lifecourse: Evidence from the 2006 census. Canberra: Griffin
Press, Australian National University.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14-25.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research
in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Breen, H. (2013). Indigenous Australian gambling in north Queensland. Cologne: Lap
Lambert Academic Publishing.
Breen, H. (2012). Risk and protective factors associated with gambling products and services:
Indigenous gamblers in north Queensland. International Journal of Mental Health
and Addiction, 10(1), 24-38.
Breen, H., & Gainsbury, S. (2013). Aboriginal gambling and problem gambling: A review.
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11(1), 75-96.
27
Breen, H., Hing, N., & Gordon, A. (2011). Indigenous gambling motivations, behaviour and
consequences in Northern New South Wales, Australia. International Journal of
Mental Health and Addiction, 9(6), 723–739.
Breen, H., Hing, N., & Gordon, A (2013a). Gambling impacts on Aboriginal communities
in New South Wales, Australia: Community leaders’ perspectives. Asian Journal of
Gambling Issues and Public Health, 3(10). DOI:10.1186/2195-3007-3-10.
Retrieved from http://www.ajgiph.com/content/3/1/10
Breen, H., Hing, N., & Gordon, A. (2013b). Indigenous Australian gambling crime and
possible interventions: A qualitative study. Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and
Public Health, 3(4). DOI: 10.1186/2195-3007-3-4. Retrieved from
http://www.ajgiph.com/content/3/1/4
Brown, S., & Coventry, L. (1997). Queen of hearts: The needs of women with gambling
problems. Melbourne: Financial and Consumer Rights Council.
Christie, M., & Greatorex, J. (2009). Workshop report, regulated gambling and problem
gambling among aborigines from remote Northern territory communities: A Yolgnu
Case Study. Darwin: Charles Darwin University.
Cooke, M., & McWhirter, J. (2011). Public policy and Aboriginal peoples in Canada: Taking
a life-course perspective. Canadian Public Policy, 37, Supplement, April, pp. S15-
S31 (Article)
Creswell, J. (2007). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods
approaches, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Csizmadia, A., Brunsma, D., & Cooney, T. (2012). Racial identification and developmental
outcomes among Black-White multiracial youth: A review from a life course
perspective. Advances in Life Course Research, 17, 34-44.
28
Deem, R. (1986). All work and no play? The sociology of women and leisure. Milton Keynes:
Open University Press.
Delfabbro, P., King, D., & Griffiths, M. (2013). From adolescent to adult gambling: An
analysis of longitudinal gambling patterns in South Australia. Journal of Gambling
Studies, DOI 10.1007/s10899-013-9384-7. Retrieved from
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10899-013-9384-7.pdf.
Echtner, C., & Prasad, P. (2003). The context of Third World tourism marketing. Annals of
Tourism Research, 30, 662-682.
Elder, G. (1994). Time, human agency and social change: Perspectives on the life course.
Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4-15.
Elder, G. (1998). The life course and human development. In R. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical
models of human development (pp. 665-715). New York: Wiley
Elder, G., & Giele, J. (2009). Life course studies: An evolving field. In G. Elder & J. Giele
(Eds.), The craft of life course research (pp. 1-25). New York: Guilford Press.
Friedli, L. (2009). Mental health, resilience and inequalities. Copenhagen: World Health
Organisation.
Gibson, H., Berdychevsky, L., & Bell, H. (2012). Girlfriend getaways over the life course:
Change and continuity. Annals of Leisure Research, 15(1), 38-54.
Glasser, W. (1976). Positive addiction. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Goodale, J. (1987). Gambling is hard work: Card playing in Tiwi society. Oceania, 58(1), 6-
21.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage
Publications.
29
Gubrium, J., & Holstein, J. (2000). Analysing interpretive practice. In N. Denzin & Y.
Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn (pp. 487-508). Thousand
Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hing, N., Breen, H., Gordon, A., & Russell, A. (online 2013a). Risk factors for gambling
problems among Indigenous Australians: An empirical study. Journal of Gambling
Studies. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-013-9364-y
Hing, N., Breen, H., Gordon, A., & Russell, A. (online 2013b). The gambling behaviour of
Indigenous Australians. Journal of Gambling Studies. DOI:10.1007/s10899-013-
9358-9.
Hing, N., Breen, H., Gordon, A., & Russell, A. (online 2013c). Gambling harms and
gambling help-seeking amongst Indigenous Australians. Journal of Gambling Studies.
DOI:10.1007/s10899-013-9388-3
Hodgins, D., & el-Guebaly, N. (2000). Natural and treatment-assisted recovery from
gambling problems: A comparison of resolved and active gamblers. Addiction, 95,
777-789.
Holdsworth, L., Nuske, E., & Breen, H. (2013). All mixed up Together: Women’s
experiences of problem gambling, comorbidity and co-occurring complex needs.
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11(3), 315-328.
Kuh, D., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Lynch, J., Hallqvist, J., & Power, C. (2003). Life course
epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57(10), 778-783.
Langton, M. (1981). Urbanising Aborigines: The social scientists ‟great deception’. Social
Alternatives, 2 (2), 16-22.
LaPlante, D., Nelson, S., LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. (2008). Stability and progression of
disordered gambling: Lessons from longitudinal studies. The Canadian Journal of
Psychiatry, 53(1), 52-60.
30
Larkin, M., Watts, S., & Clifton, E. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative
phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 102–120.
Li, X., Stanton, B., & Feigelman, S. (2000). Impact of perceived parental monitoring on
adolescent risk behaviour over four years. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 49–56.
Liefbroer, A., & Elzinga, C. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of behavioural patterns:
How similar are parents’ and children’s demographic trajectories? Advances in Life
Course Research, 17, 1-10.
Martin, K. (2008). Please knock before you enter: Aboriginal regulation of outsiders and the
implications for researchers. Brisbane: Post Pressed.
Ministry of Health (2009). A focus on problem gambling: Results of the 2006/07 New
Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
Moffitt, T., Caspi, A., Harrington, H., & Milne, B. (2002). Males on the life-course-persistent
and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years. Development
and Psychopathology, 14(1), 179-207.
Nagin, D., Farrington, D., & Moffitt, T. (1995). Life-course trajectories of different types of
offenders. Criminology, 33(1), 111-140.
Neve, R., Lemmens, P., & Drop, M. (2000). Changes in alcohol use and drinking problems in
relation to role transitions in different stages of the life course. Substance Abuse,
21(3), 163-178.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks:
Sage Publications.
Phillips, G. (2003). Addictions and healing in Aboriginal Country. Canberra: Aboriginal
Studies Press.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New
York: Simon and Schuster.
31
Raento, P., & Meuronen, M. (2011). Virtues of visualization: Gambling in Finnish editorial
cartoons. International Gambling Studies, 11(1), 107-120.
Reith, G., & Dobbie, F. (2011). Beginning gambling: The role of social networks and
environment. Addiction Research and Theory, 19(6), 483-493.
Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of
adult social bonds. American Psychological Review, 55(5), 609-627.
Sayers, S., Mackerras, D., Singh, G., Bucens, I., Flynn, K., & Reid, A. (2003). An Australian
Aboriginal birth cohort: A unique resource for a life course study of an Indigenous
population. A study protocol. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 3(1), 1.
Schwandt, T. (2003). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry. In N. Denzin &
Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research theories and issues, 2nd edn.
Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Shaffer, H., & Hall, M. (2002). The natural history of gambling and drinking problems
among casino employees. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 405-424.
SHORE & Whariki (2008). Assessment of the social impacts of gambling in New Zealand.
Auckland: Author.
Slutske, W. (2006). Natural recovery and treatment-seeking in pathological gambling:
Results of two U.S. national surveys. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(2),
297-302.
Slutske, W., Blaszczynski, A., & Martin, N. (2009). Sex differences in the rates of recovery,
Australian community-based twin survey. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12(5),
425–432.
Slutske, W., Jackson, K., & Sher, K. (2003). The natural history of problem gambling from
age 18 to 29. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(2), 263-274.
32
Smith, G., Currie, C., & Battle, J. (2011). Exploring gambling impacts in two Alberta Cree
communities: A participatory action study. In Y. Belanger (Ed.), First Nations
gambling in Canada: Current trends and issues (pp. 118-139). Winnipeg: University
of Manitoba Press.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis:
Theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications.
Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. (2008) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. Smith
(Ed.), Qualitative psychology, A practical guide to research methods, 2nd edn (pp. 53-
80). London: Sage Publications.
Smith, J.A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological
analysis. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology:
Theories and methods (pp. 218–240). London: Sage Publications.
Stevens, M., & Bailie, R. (2012). Gambling, housing conditions, community contexts and
child health in remote Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory, Australia.
BMC Public Health, 12, 377.
Stevens, M., & Young, M. (2009). Reported gambling problems in the Indigenous and total
Australian population. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.
Stiles, W. (1993). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13,
593–618.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009) Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand
Oaks: Sage Publications.
United Nations (2008). Resource kit for Indigenous peoples’ issues. New York: Author.
Williams, R., Stevens, R., & Nixon, G. (2011). Gambling and problem gambling in North
American Aboriginal People. In Y. Belanger (Ed.), First Nations gambling in
33
Canada: Current trends and issues, 166-194. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba
Press.
Wingens, M., de Valk, H., Windzio, M., & Aybek, C. (2011). The sociological life course
approach and research on migration and integration. In M. Wingens, M. Windzio, H.
de Valk & C. Aybek (Eds.), A life-course perspective on migration and integration
(pp. 1-27). Dordrecht: Springer.
34
Table 1 Participants by age and gender
Age group Female Male Total
18 – 30 years, young adult 12 8 20
31 – 65 years, mature adult 17 18 35
65 years+, older person 2 0 2
Total 31 26 57
35
Table 2 No. of participants exposed to or engaged in gambling by age group and gender
Age group Female Male
Gambling exposure &/or
engagement
Yes No Total Yes No Total
Early childhood
environment, under 13
years: exposure
26 5 31 20 6 26
Teen, 13- 17 years:
exposure & engagement
9 22 31 13 13 26
Young adult, 18-30 years:
engagement
27 4 31 20 6 26
Mature adult, 31-65 years:
engagement
13 3 16 14 3 17
Older adult, over 65 years:
engagement
2 0 2 0 0 0
36
Figure 1 A representation of major sequential influences on gambling life course trajectories
for participants
1. Early gambling exposure: linked lives & social embeddedness - dependence
2. Teenage gambling exposure & use: human agency & control - growing independence
3. Young adult gambling: timing of major shifts & transitions
4. Mature adult gambling: Interplay of human life & history - rationalisation
Environment Cultural values Historical influences
Social norms Kinship Socialisation