Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Who
Did
We
Talk
To?
3% I
T O
per
atio
ns
6% M
anag
er, D
irec
tor,
or
Exec
uti
ve
5% B
uild
Man
ager
22%
Arc
hit
ect
13%
Tea
m L
ead
/Pro
ject
Man
ager
52%
So
ftw
are
Dev
elo
per
/En
gin
eer
Ro
le W
ith
in t
he
Org
aniz
atio
n
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
A va
riety
of o
rgan
izat
ions
wer
e re
pres
ente
d
17%
Fin
anci
al S
ervi
ces
33%
Tec
h &
ISV
12%
Co
nsu
ltin
g
6% T
elec
om
mu
nic
atio
ns
2% M
anu
fact
ori
ng
5% M
edia
& E
nte
rtai
nm
ent
7% G
ove
rmen
t &
Mili
tary
18%
Oth
er
Org
aniz
atio
ns
Surv
eyed
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Org
aniz
atio
ns la
rge
and
smal
l par
ticip
ated
24%
19%
23%
34%
501+
101-
500
26-1
00
1-25
Nu
mb
er o
f D
evel
op
ers
in t
he
Org
aniz
atio
n
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
OS
dev
elop
men
t inf
rast
ruct
ure
is q
uick
ly b
ecom
ing
the
stan
dard
We’
re s
tan
dar
diz
ing
on
an
op
en s
ou
rce
dev
elo
pm
ent
infr
astr
uct
ure
sta
ck
49%
2011
52%
2012
We
on
ly u
se o
pen
so
urc
e in
fras
tru
ctu
re if
it’s
co
mm
erci
ally
su
pp
ort
ed
7%
10%
2011
2012
2011
2012
2011
2012
It’s
no
t o
ur
corp
ora
te s
tan
dar
d, b
ut
ton
s o
f peo
ple
use
it
27%
27%
A fe
w o
f ou
r d
evel
op
ers
use
it, b
ut
it’s
no
t w
idel
y ad
op
ted
17%
11%
Do
es y
ou
r o
rgan
izat
ion
use
op
en s
ou
rce
dev
elo
pm
ent
infr
astr
uct
ure
?
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Mos
t of y
ou u
se a
repo
sito
ry m
anag
er, h
ere’
s w
hy
Wh
y d
o y
ou
use
a r
epo
sito
ry m
anag
er?
64%
Imp
rove
b
uild
tim
e
35%
To e
nfo
rce
stan
dar
ds
for
co
mp
on
ent
usa
ge
32%
Bet
ter
visi
bili
ty in
toco
mp
on
ent
usa
ge
67%
To m
anag
eco
mp
on
ent
usa
ge
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Visi
bilit
y an
d co
ntro
l is
even
mor
e im
porta
nt fo
r lar
ge o
rgan
izat
ions
Wh
y d
o y
ou
use
a r
epo
sito
ry m
anag
er?
64%
Imp
rove
b
uild
tim
e
41%
To e
nfo
rce
stan
dar
ds
for
co
mp
on
ent
usa
ge
34%
Bet
ter
visi
bili
ty in
toco
mp
on
ent
usa
ge
75%
To m
anag
eco
mp
on
ent
usa
ge
Org
aniz
atio
ns
with
ove
r 50
0 d
evel
ope
rs
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
2/3
of o
rgan
izat
ion
cont
ribut
e to
ope
n so
urce
pro
ject
s
We
stri
ctly
co
nsu
me
op
en s
ou
rce
34%
We
use
op
en s
ou
rce
and
co
ntr
ibu
te
dir
ectl
y b
ack
to p
roje
cts
45%
We
use
op
en s
ou
rce
and
co
ntr
ibu
teb
ack
via
a th
ird
par
ty12
%W
e co
ntr
ibu
te t
o o
pen
so
urc
e p
roje
cts
even
th
ou
gh
ou
r co
mp
any’
sp
olic
ies
pro
hib
it it
9%
Op
en S
ou
rce
in O
rgan
izat
ion
s
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
45%
34%
12%
9%
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
You
told
us
that
Jav
a O
S c
ompo
nent
s ar
e th
e m
ost i
mpo
rtant
to y
ou
4%
Perl
5.
4%
Pyth
on
4.
14% C
/ C
++
3.
15%
.NET
2.86
%
Java
1.Ho
w im
po
rtan
t ar
e th
e fo
llow
ing
typ
es o
f o
pen
so
urc
e co
mp
on
ents
to
yo
ur
org
aniz
atio
n?
Perc
enta
ge r
epo
rtin
g cr
itic
al, p
rett
y im
po
rtan
t, o
r m
ediu
m, b
ut
gett
ing
mo
re im
po
rtan
t
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Web
sea
rche
s ar
e th
e m
ost c
omm
on w
ay o
f fin
ding
com
pone
nts
Mu
st a
dh
ere
to c
orp
ora
te s
tan
dar
ds
35%
70%
Sear
ch t
he
web
for
arti
fact
s th
at m
eet
ou
r n
eed
s
35%
Use
mas
ter
rep
osi
tory
sea
rch
to
ols
(eg
. Cen
tral
Rep
osi
tory
Sea
rch
)
42%
Rel
y o
n t
he
advi
ce o
f m
y co
lleag
ues
Ho
w d
o y
ou
fin
d a
rtif
acts
for
you
r p
roje
cts?
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
The
Cen
tral R
epos
itory
is th
e m
ost p
opul
ar s
ourc
e of
com
pone
nts
1.87
of
527
%
Git
Hu
b5.
2.13
of
539
% Atl
assi
an4.
2.22
of
54
3%
JBo
ss3.
2.4
4 o
f 5
51%
Pro
ject
Sit
es2.
3.17
of
578
%
Cen
tral
Rep
osi
tory
1.Wh
at s
ou
rces
of
op
en s
ou
rce
com
po
nen
ts a
re
mo
st im
po
rtan
t to
yo
ur
dev
elo
pm
ent
e!o
rts?
Perc
enta
ge r
epo
rtin
g cr
itic
al o
r im
po
rtan
t
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Her
e’s
wha
t you
sai
d m
atte
rs a
bout
the
com
pone
nt y
ou u
se
Secu
rity
Co
de
Qu
alit
yP
roje
ct M
atu
rity
Lice
nsi
ng
32%
19%
51%
25%
28%
51%
18%
25%
34%
27%
39%
22% M
issi
on
cri
tica
lEx
trem
ely
imp
ort
ant
Som
ewh
at im
po
rtan
tM
ino
r co
nce
rnN
ot
a co
nce
rn a
t al
l
For
the
com
po
nen
ts y
ou
use
in y
ou
r ap
plic
atio
ns,
ho
wim
po
rtan
t ar
e th
ese
attr
ibu
tes?
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Onl
y ha
lf of
you
hav
e an
ope
n so
urce
pol
icy
Do
es y
ou
r o
rgan
izat
ion
hav
e an
op
en s
ou
rce
po
licy?
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
51%
No
49%
Yes
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
You
told
us,
mos
t of y
our o
rgan
izat
ions
lack
con
trol o
ver O
S u
sage
We’
re c
om
ple
tely
lock
ed d
ow
n. W
e ca
n
on
ly u
se a
pp
rove
d c
om
po
nen
ts.
20%
We
hav
e so
me
corp
ora
te s
tan
dar
ds,
bu
t th
ey a
ren
’t e
nfo
rced
.4
3%T
her
e ar
e n
o s
tan
dar
ds.
Eac
h d
evel
op
erte
am c
ho
ose
th
e co
mp
on
ents
th
at a
reb
est
for
thei
r p
roje
ct.
37%
Co
ntr
ol o
f ar
tifa
cts
in d
evel
op
men
t
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
13%
in 2
011
20%
45%
in 2
011
37%
42%
in 2
011
43%
We’
re c
om
plet
ely
lock
ed d
ow
n. W
e ca
n o
nly
u
se a
pp
rove
d c
om
po
nen
ts.
We
hav
e so
me
corp
ora
te s
tan
dar
ds,
bu
t th
ey
aren
’t en
forc
ed.
Th
ere
are
no
sta
nd
ard
s, e
ach
dev
elo
pm
ent
team
ch
oo
ses
thei
r o
wn
co
mp
on
ents
.
Co
ntr
ol o
f A
rtif
acts
in D
evel
op
men
t
2011
/201
2 So
nat
ype
surv
eys
of d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Reg
ulat
ed in
dust
ries
are
mor
e lik
ely
to b
e lo
cked
dow
n
31%
18%
13%
25%
21%
12%
19%
19%
Finan
cial S
ervic
es
Tech/IS
VConsu
ltingTele
com
munica
tions
Man
ufact
uring
Med
ia &
Enterta
inm
ent
Govt &
Mili
taryOth
er
Co
ntr
ol o
f A
rtif
acts
by
Sect
or
We
are
com
ple
tely
lock
ed d
ow
n. W
e ca
n o
nly
use
ap
pro
ved
co
mp
on
ents
.
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Onl
y 23
% o
f you
nee
d ap
prov
al b
efor
e us
ing
OS
com
pone
nts
51%
Do
no
t h
ave
a p
olic
y26
% H
ave
a p
olic
y 23
% M
ust
hav
e ap
pro
val b
efo
re u
sin
g a
ny
op
en s
ou
rce
com
po
nen
ts
Do
es y
ou
r o
rgan
izat
ion
hav
e an
op
en s
ou
rce
po
licy
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
For t
hose
of y
ou w
ith p
olic
ies.
..mor
e th
an h
alf o
f you
hat
e th
em
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Lots
of g
roup
s ar
e re
spon
sibl
e fo
r ope
n so
urce
pol
icy
Wh
o is
res
po
nsi
ble
for
Op
en S
ou
rce
Go
vern
ance
?
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Team
s
16%
6% 7%
28%
15%
12%
18%
Leg
al
Secu
rity
Ris
k an
d C
om
plia
nce
Ap
plic
atio
n D
evel
op
men
t M
anag
emen
t
IT O
per
atio
ns
OSS
/FO
SS C
om
mit
tee/
Dep
artm
ent
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Do
es y
ou
r o
pen
so
urc
e p
olic
y re
stri
ct c
om
po
nen
t u
sag
e b
ased
on
sp
ecifi
c lic
ense
s?
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Yes
and
we
exam
ine
ever
y co
mp
on
ent
and
*al
l* o
f its
dep
end
enci
esYe
s an
d w
e ex
amin
e ev
ery
com
po
nen
t b
ut
*no
t* it
s d
epen
den
cies
51%
25%
No
, ou
r p
olic
y d
oes
no
t re
stri
ct c
om
po
nen
t u
sage
bas
ed o
n li
cen
sin
g
24%
Ove
r 3/
4 o
f org
aniz
atio
ns
rest
rict
co
mp
on
ent
usa
ge b
ased
on
sp
ecifi
c lic
ense
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Pol
icy
rest
rictin
g co
mpo
nent
usa
ge b
ased
on
spec
ific
licen
ses
Polic
y re
stri
ctin
g c
om
po
nen
t u
sag
e b
ased
on
sp
ecifi
c lic
ense
s:
Yes
and
we
exam
ine
ever
y co
mp
on
ent
and
*al
l* o
f its
dep
end
enci
es
Yes
and
we
exam
ine
ever
y co
mp
on
ent
bu
t *n
ot*
its
dep
end
enci
es
No
, ou
r p
olic
y d
oes
no
t re
stri
ct c
om
po
nen
t u
sage
bas
ed o
n li
cen
sin
g
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
51%
25%
24%
hav
e n
o e!
ecti
velic
ensi
ng
po
licy
49%
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
48%
No
32%
Yes
, fo
r al
l co
mp
on
ents
incl
ud
ing
dep
end
enci
es
20%
Yes
, fo
r al
l co
mp
on
ents
bu
t N
OT
th
eir
dep
end
enci
es
Do
es y
ou
r o
rgan
izat
ion
mai
nta
in a
n in
ven
tory
of
op
en
sou
rce
com
po
nen
ts u
sed
in p
rod
uct
ion
ap
plic
atio
ns?
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
It’s
diffi
cult
to k
now
whe
n co
mpo
nent
s &
dep
ende
ncie
s ar
e up
date
d
No
go
od
way
to
fin
d o
ut
Wh
en a
co
mp
on
ent
is u
pd
ated
, ho
w d
o y
ou
kn
ow
?
2012
So
nat
ype
surv
ey o
f 2,5
50 d
evel
ope
rs, a
rch
itect
s, a
nd
man
ager
s
74%
40%
30%
20%
66%
By
sear
chin
g th
e w
eb
Kee
pin
g u
p w
ith
pro
ject
sit
es
Fro
m c
olle
agu
es
Wo
rd o
f mo
uth
Tran
sfor
min
g S
oftw
are
Dev
elop
men
t
Than
k yo
u!
