16
Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016 : Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu Sneha Sarah Mani with Phuong Hong Nguyen, Neha Kohli, Rasmi Avula and Purnima Menon Poverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute May 3, 2017

Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

  • Upload
    poshan

  • View
    230

  • Download
    11

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Trends  in  Outcomes,  Determinants  and  Interventions  between  2006  and  2016  :  Uttar  Pradesh  and  Tamil  Nadu

Sneha  Sarah  Maniwith  Phuong  Hong  Nguyen,  Neha  Kohli,  Rasmi  Avula  and  Purnima  Menon

Poverty,  Health  and  Nutrition  Division,  International  Food  Policy  Research  Institute

May  3,  2017

Page 2: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Objectives

§ Examine  state-­specific  trends  in  nutrition  outcomes,  determinants  and  the  coverage  of  interventions

§ District  level  variability  in  nutrition  outcomes

§ Tamil  Nadu  and  Uttar  Pradesh  used  as  examples

Page 3: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Data  and  Methods

§ Data  sources:oNational  Family  Health  Survey-­4  (NFHS-­4,  2015–16)  factsheets  oNational  Family  Health  Survey-­3  (2005–06)  factsheets/reportoRapid  Survey  on  Children  (RSoC,  2013–2014)  for  indicators  that  are  currently  not  available  in  NFHS-­4  fact  sheets.

§ Analysis  – trends  and  levelsoOutcome  indicatorso Immediate  and  underlying  determinants  oCoverage  of  nutrition-­specific  interventions

Page 4: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Trends  in  nutrition  outcomes,  2006  and  2016

Uttar Pradesh Tamil  Nadu

Sources :  NFHS-­‐3,  NFHS-­‐4  and  RSoC

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Stunting Anemia  among  women

Exclusive  breastfeeding

Wasting Low  birth  weight

%

Uttar  Pradesh  2006 Uttar  Pradesh  2016 India  2006 India  2016

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Stunting Anemia  among  women

Exclusive  breastfeeding

Wasting Low  birthweight

%

Tamil  Nadu  2006 Tamil  Nadu  2016 India  2006 India  2016

Page 5: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Inter  district  variability  -­ Stunting

Uttar  Pradesh Tamil  Nadu

Source  :  NFHS-­‐4

Page 6: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Inter  district  variability  – Wasting  and  Severe  WastingUttar  Pradesh

Source  :  NFHS-­‐4

Uttar  Pradesh

Page 7: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Inter  district  variability  – Wasting  and  Severe  WastingTamil  Nadu Tamil  Nadu

Page 8: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Inter  district  variability  – Exclusive  BreastfeedingUttar  Pradesh Tamil  Nadu

Source  :  NFHS-­‐4

Page 9: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Inter  district  variability  – Anemia  among  womenUttar  Pradesh Tamil  Nadu

Source  :  NFHS-­‐4

Page 10: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Changes  in  immediate  determinants  of  nutrition,  2006  to  2016

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2006 2016

%

Women  with  body  mass  index  <18.5 Early  initiation  of  breastfeeding Timely  introduction  of  foods

Adequate  diet Diarrhea  in  the  last  two  weeks ARI  in  the  last  two  weeks

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2006 2016

%

Uttar  Pradesh Tamil  Nadu

Sources  :  NFHS-­‐3  and  NFHS-­‐4

Page 11: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Changes  in nutrition-­specific  interventions  along  the  continuum  of  care,  2006  to  2016

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2006 2016

%

ANC    first  trimester 4+  ANC  visits   Consumed  100+  IFA  during  pregnancyANC-­‐ neonatal  tetanus   Supplementary  food-­‐ pregnancy Delivery  in  health  facilitySkilled  birth  attendent Birth  registration Supplementary  food-­‐ lactationFull  immunization Received  vitamin  A    in  the  last  6  months Supplementary  food-­‐ childrenORS  during  diarrhea  

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2006 2016

%

Uttar  Pradesh Tamil  Nadu

Sources  :  NFHS-­‐4  and  RSoC

Page 12: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2006 2016

%

Women  who  are  literate Women  with  ≥10  years  educationGirls  married  before  age  of  18 Households  with  access  to  improved  drinking  waterHouseholds  with  access  to  improved  sanitation  facility Households  with  electricityOpen  defecation  

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2006 2016%

Uttar  Pradesh Tamil  Nadu

Changes  in  underlying  determinants  of  nutrition,  2006  to  2016  

Sources  :  NFHS-­‐3  and  NFHS-­‐4

Page 13: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Levels  of  Non  Communicable  Diseases,  2006  to  2016

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

District  average

India  average

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

District  average

India  average

Uttar  Pradesh Tamil  Nadu

Page 14: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Implications  and  Recommendations  :  Uttar  Pradesh

§ Strengthen  coverage  of  antenatal  care,  IFA  supplementation,  food  supplementation  and  other  interventions  related  to  maternal  care  during  pregnancy.  

§ Strengthen  actions  to  support  child  healtho ImmunizationoORS  and  zincoAdequate  infant  and  young  child  feeding  practices  (particularly  complementary  feeding  practices).  

§ Urgent  attention  needed  to  improve  oAccess  to  electricity  and  oAccess  to  sanitation  oWomen’s  education  oDelay  age  at  marriage

Page 15: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

Implications  and  Recommendations  :  Tamil  Nadu

§ Urgent  attention  needed  to  reverse  the  decline  in  full  immunization  levels§ Strengthen  coverage  of  antenatal  care,  IFA  supplementation,  food  supplementation  and  other  interventions  related  to  maternal  care  during  pregnancy  and  lactation

§ Improve  access  to  sanitation  facilities§ Strengthen  actions  to  support  child  health  especially  complementary  feeding  practices

§ Sustain  the  current  high  coverage  level  for  various  interventions

Page 16: Trends in Outcomes, Determinants and Interventions between 2006 and 2016: Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

POSHAN  Policy  Notes  on  States

Maharashtra     Haryana UttarakhandJharkhand Goa PunjabKarnataka Delhi ChhattisgarhMadhya  Pradesh Rajasthan

Upcoming  policy  notes: