Upload
anna-jacobsen
View
112
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Conducted annually in late January
JAN
24
Consistent methodology since 1992 so that
comparison can be done over time
1-night count & survey of Pasadena’s
homeless population
ABOUT THE COUNT 2017
Homeless Count
Unsheltered On the street Abandoned buildings Cars, vans, RVs Encampment areas
Does not include: Doubled up At-risk of homelessness
Sheltered Emergency shelters Transitional housing
Hotel/motel vouchers
347 60% (n=347)
40% (n=228)
2017 Homeless
Count WHO IS COUNTED
535 549 741
646 763
437 393 401 442 352 347
434 434
403 491
453
467 379
265 190 178 228
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Unsheltered Sheltered
53% decrease since 2011
28% increase in sheltered count since 2016
969 983
1,144
904
772
666 632 530 575
1,137 1,216
LONG-TERM DOWNWARD TREND 2007-2017
Homeless Survey Findings
Ne
w Y
ork
, NY
| 4
9.0%
Wic
hita
, KS
| 4
8.7%
Ho
no
lulu
, HI |
35.
8%
Wa
shin
gto
n, D
C |
34.
1%
San
Fra
nc
isco
, CA
| 2
0.1%
Los
An
ge
les,
CA
| 1
4.2%
Port
lan
d, M
E |
13.
5%
Ind
ian
ap
olis
, IN
| 1
1.3%
Na
shvi
lle, T
N |
5.
8%
San
An
ton
io, T
X |
3.
4%
Okl
ah
om
a C
ity, O
K |
2.
4%
Phila
de
lph
ia, P
A |
-3.
0%
Gre
sha
m, O
R |
-4.
2%
Port
lan
d, O
R |
-4.
2%
St. L
ou
is, M
O |
-4.
4%
Ch
ica
go
, IL
| -
5.6%
El P
aso
, TX
| -
12.7
%
An
ch
ora
ge
, AK
| -
12.8
%
Ca
mb
ridg
e, M
A |
-18
.8%
Au
stin
, TX
| -
19.0
%
Balti
mo
re, M
D |
-20
.3%
Lou
isvill
e, K
Y |
-26
.3%
Lin
co
ln, N
E |
-28
.7%
Ch
arlo
tte
, NC
| 2
9.9%
Ale
xan
dria
, VA
| -
33.1
%
Du
rha
m, N
C |
-34
.0%
De
tro
it, M
I | -
36.8
%
Alb
uq
ue
rqu
e, N
M |
-39
.0%
Lon
g B
ea
ch
, CA
| -
42.4
%
Au
gu
sta
, GA
| -
48.4
%
Pasa
de
na, C
A |
-53
.7%
CHANGE IN HOMELESSNESS IN CITIES NATIONWIDE 2009-2016
Homeless Survey Findings
Total Homeless (575)
Veterans (30)
Chronically Homeless (198)
Families (109)
Youth & Children 0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
HOMELESS SUBPOPULATION TRENDS 2007-2017
2017 Homeless Count
(35)
Homeless Survey Findings
HIGHER HEALTH NEEDS OF CHRONICALLY HOMELESS 2016 & 2017
65%
1%
73%
31%
47%
28%
25%
1%
24%
11%
19%
11%
Chronic Health Conditions
HIV/AIDS
Physical Disability
Developmental Disability
Mental Illness
Substance Use Disorder Homeless Population Chronically Homeless
People experiencing chronic homelessness are one of the most vulnerable homeless populations
Wic
hita
, KS
| 1
60.8
%
Wa
shin
gto
n, D
C |
103
.4%
Ne
w Y
ork
, NY
| 4
3.0%
Na
shvi
lle, T
N |
35.
2%
San
Fra
nc
isco
, CA
| 3
3.7%
Du
rha
m, N
C |
18.
2%
Ho
no
lulu
, HI |
17.
4%
Okl
ah
om
a C
ity, O
K |
15.
7%
El P
aso
, TX
| 4
.9%
St. L
ou
is, M
O |
-0.
9%
Ch
arlo
tte
, NC
| -
2.1%
Au
stin
, TX
| -
5.7%
San
An
ton
io, T
X |
-6.
5%
De
tro
it, M
I | -
11.5
%
Port
lan
d, M
E |
-16
.2%
Lou
isvill
e, K
Y |
-17
.1%
Phila
de
lph
ia, P
A |
-17.
5%
Ind
ian
ap
olis
, IN
| -
24.5
%
Ch
ica
go
, IL
| -
25.2
%
Balti
mo
re, M
D |
-25.
3%
Ale
xan
dria
, VA
| -
29.6
%
Alb
uq
ue
rqu
e, N
M |
-35
.2%
Au
gu
sta
, GA
| -
37.1
%
Port
lan
d, O
R |
-38
.2%
Gre
sha
m, O
R |
-38
.2%
Lon
g B
ea
ch
, CA
|-5
1.8%
An
ch
ora
ge
, AK
| -
55.2
%
Lin
co
ln, N
E |
-60
.1%
Ca
mb
ridg
e, M
A |
-64.
7%
Pasa
de
na
, CA
| -
65.9
%
PERCENT CHANGE IN FAMILY HOMELESSNESS BY CITY
2009-2016 2017 Homeless Count
INCREASE HOUSING SUPPLY By developing new permanent supportive housing units and strengthening landlord relationships.
CONTINUED OUTREACH
Build trust through continued outreach
12
LIMITED HOUSING High rents & low vacancy rates mean very few units accept permanent supportive housing (PSH) vouchers. As a result there is a need for more PSH units.
SERVICE RESISTANCE Individuals with highest needs continue to be the most service resistant.
MEASURE H Will provide additional funding for homeless services
INCREASED NEED FOR SERVICES The current chronically homeless population has significant service needs
2017 Homeless Count CHALLENGES & RESPONES
REGIONAL RESOURCES
13
PROP HHH $1.2B
MEASURE H
$3.5B
NO PLACE LIKE HOME
$625M
City of LA capital for PSH
County-wide capital for PSH
County-wide homeless services
Homeless Survey Findings
Acknowledgements A special thanks to Urban Initiatives and the 120 volunteers who made
the count possible as well as our numerous partners including Union Station Homeless Services, Friends in Deed, Door of Hope, Housing Works,
United Way, the HOPE Team, New Directions, the City of Pasadena Libraries, the Pasadena Department of Public Works, and the Pasadena
Department of Public Health.