40
Social Enterprise Study 2012, May 1 [email protected] I @enriquez_n

Social business study 2012

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Social business study 2012

Social  Enterprise    

Study  2012,  May  

1  [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 2: Social business study 2012

Designa(ons  

2  [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

“Enterprise social software” Bluekiwi

“SBS” : “Social Business Software” Jive

“Enterprise social platform” Forrester

“Social media & Social organization”

Gartner

“Enterprise social network” Yammer

“Enterprise social software” Gartner

Multiple designations…2012

Page 3: Social business study 2012

3  

Agenda  

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Issues, Purposes, Scope & benefits Cultural issues & Change impacts Social business landscape Architecture Ecosystem trends Case studies Community management Legal Issues

Appendix

Page 4: Social business study 2012

4  

Organization issues

Employees issues

Social Issues

  Matrix organization compartmentalization constraints   Reticular Management collaborative needs   Remote access and workshifting   Decentralized organization Risk of information loss   Spread & structuring of information & expertise

  Efficiency in remote mode, collaborative tools 50% employees (managers included) expect to benefit from innovative

tools provided by the HR (cf. Markess Study “Solutions en réponse aux nouveaux enjeux RH : … Perspectives 2014”)

  Digital natives / “Google” generation   Internet access by mobiles and tablets   “Social” internet: navigation guided by affinity and rating

Issues

“Atos Origin employees under 30 years don’t use email anymore. Electronic e-mail systems are only used to store data for this population. They develop their own social platform to connect & interact.”

LMI, French IT magazine

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 5: Social business study 2012

New  purposes  

•  “Tradi(onal”  purposes  from  content  management                                                                                      &  collabora(ve  1.0  

5  

Toward Enterprise 2.0…

•  New purposes from public social media

➜ Private & instant messaging systems, Webinars, Blogs, Forums, Working space, Knowledge management & Content management, “Who’s who”, “Who works with”, …

➜ Profile, Communities, Pages (Facebook), Wall, Networking, Social bookmarking, Ratings, Recommendations, Activity & news follow-up …

•  New purposes from internet ➜ Tagging, RSS feeds, Podcast, Streaming media, Wikis …

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 6: Social business study 2012

Scope  

•  2  types  of  use    

6  

•  Scope

➜ internal ➜ and/or toward ecosystem

0  

0,2  

0,4  

0,6  

0,8  

1  

1,2  

1,4  

1,6  

1,8  

2  

Adapted from Lecko / Useo

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 7: Social business study 2012

7  

Key  services  and  features  Relationship & Conversation

Relationship

  Access management & digital identity (photos, expertise, experience, …)   Contributors & comments display   Connection information display   Members activity subscription (mail, RSS)

  Members activity follow-up & “Who’s following who” display   Members network showed as a Social graph   Recommendation of information, people, group, etc.   Expertise location

Activity focus

Linking focus

Conversation

  Management of private working spaces   Sharing of documents, wikis, blogs, etc.   Sharing of questions, ideas, surveys, conversations, etc.   Activity stream (i.e.: latest news …)

  Activity stream organization   Conversation feeding by the activity stream   Relay, recommend, vote, rate   Collaborate within the conversation’s stream (i.e.: documents sharing…)

Document focus

Conversation focus

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 8: Social business study 2012

Main  benefits  

8  

 

 Increase  speed  to  access  knowledge                                                                          &  internal  experts  ➜  “collecJve  intelligence”  

 Amplify  collabora(on  to  get  work  done  faster                                &  beQer,  regardless  of  their  locaJon                                                        or  organizaJonal  boundaries                                                                                          ➜  “mass  collaboraJon”  

 Increase  agility,  speed  &  effec(veness   Accelerate  innova(on  

McKinsey Global Institute

“For 40% companies, social networking

& blogs are now in use”

Source  :  How  social  technologies  are  extending  the  organiza3on  McKinsey  Global  Ins(tute  

“Connect. Collaborate. Anywhere.”

Jive Mobile Solution [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 9: Social business study 2012

9  [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Cultural  issues  &  Change  impacts  

Page 10: Social business study 2012

Cultural  issues  

10  

Source  :  Bluekiwi  workshop,    

Event  :  Salon  Solu(ons  RH,  march  2012  

All  workshop  available  in  lewub.net  

“I’ve already have an intranet…” “I’ll loose my power…”

“Everybody will have access to information…”

“It’s a waste of time…” “The executive team won’t allow that…”

“The Communication department thinks it’s

not relevant…” “But people will talk to

each other…”

“It can be risky…”

“What about confidentiality…”

“Just another technology…”

“E-mails are sufficient…”

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 11: Social business study 2012

Change  impacts  

11  

Toward  “social  organiza(ons”:   Change  the  way  people  interact  &  work   New  way  to  organize  the  knowledge  :  permanent  &  searchable  

 Not  a  tool    a  new  prac(ce      New  HR  issues:  

 New  way  of  thinking  “GPEC”                                                                  &  working  habits  

 New  skills  &  contributors  reward   “Mass  collaboraJon”  

Key Drivers

Change management effort

Charter of best practices

HR 2.0 strategy

3 major Key Drivers leading to a successful project

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 12: Social business study 2012

12  [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Social  business  landscape  

Page 13: Social business study 2012

13  

Compe((ve  landscape  matrix  

Rela(onship    

Discussion  

Networking  

Source:  Lecko  /  Useo  

  Access  management                      &  digital  idenJty    

  Contributors  &  comments  display  

  ConnecJon  informaJon  display  

  Members  acJvity  subscripJon  (mail,  RSS)  

  Members  acJvity  follow-­‐up  &  «  Who’s  following    who  »  display    

  Members  network  showed  as  a  Social  graph  

  Recommenda(on  of  informa(on,  people,  group,  etc    

  Exper(se  loca(on  

  Management  of  private  working  spaces      

  Sharing  of    documents,  wikis,  blogs,  etc    

  Sharing  of  quesJons,  ideas,  surveys,  conversaJons,  etc.  

  AcJvity  stream  organizaJon    ConversaJon  feeding  by  the  

acJvity  stream    Relay,  recommend,  vote,  

rate    Collaborate  within  the  

conversa(on’s  stream  (i.e.:  documents  sharing…)  

Community  

Collec(ve  intelligence  

Dialog  

Link

ing  focus  

Ac(v

ity  fo

cus  

Conversa(on  focus  Document  focus  

.

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 14: Social business study 2012

Social  business  landscape  

Networking

Community Dialog

Collective intelligence

Discussion

Relationship

Primary players from ECM , DMS & KM MS Sharepoint, IBM, Jalios… Improve the traditional tools and database dedicated to Content / Document / Knowledge management with additional social features

Evolving market with 3 major origins of actors Adapted from Lecko / Useo

1

New actors / “Pure” players Bluekiwi, Knowledge Plaza, Jamespot… Interface natively oriented around the conversation and complete personal profiles. Information is organized through the chronology & the “folksonomy” (tags for non-experts)

2

Business players: ERP, CRM, HR… SalesForce (Rypple, Chatter, Radian6) SAP (SuccessFactors, Jam) Cornerstone Saba (CloudPeople)… Enrich their current offerings with key social features (partner or buy)

3

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n   14  

Page 15: Social business study 2012

Business  model  A historical typology from business models that quickly evolve & converge…

Infrastructure tools The infrastructure offerings are more historically focused on the resource/document with a structural logic and tree. However they are quickly evolving toward relationship side.

SaaS SaaS offerings have an architecture and value proposition to encourage conversation. They were not primary focused on resource/document and have lack of CM features but have a greater networking potential.

Open source The open source offerings are still behind in terms of maturity. They have often basic social features, but a significant advantage of cost and flexibility.

Networking

Community Dialog

Collective intelligence

Discussion

Relationship Adapted from Lecko / Useo

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n   15  

Page 16: Social business study 2012

Social  business  landscape  

Leaders   Strong  performers  

Focused  soluJons  Limited  to  Micro  blogging                                                                  

&  AcJvity  streams  

Broad & Consistent set of functionality

IBM Jive NewsGator Telligent BlueKiwi - France

Atlassian Microsoft SharePoint Socialtext + Competitive options:

OpenText & Cisco

Adapted from Forrester

Chatter Tibbr

Socialcast Yammer

16  

Page 17: Social business study 2012

Social  business  landscape  -­‐  Benchmark  Vendor Solution French logos Offer mode Business model

IBM Connections Sogeti, ASI Informatique, Optique 2000 …

ISV Modules in SaaS Mobile

NC

Jive Jive SBS Leader in France SAP, CISCO, Nike, CSC

SaaS & ISV Mobile

Fremium Business : 5€/month Enterprise : NC

NewsGator Tomoye Few clients Bouygues Telecom, BNPP ISV NC

Telligent Telligent Enterprise

Few clients La Banque postale

SaaS & ISV Mobile NC

Atos BlueKiwi Leader in France

Total, SFR, Thales, GDF-Suez, Allianz …

SaaS & dedicated Cloud

100 users : 7,5€/month 500 users : 6€/month 2000 users : 4€/month + Licenses

Atlassian Confluence Few clients

Société Générale Good presence in Fr w/ JIRA

SaaS 51 - 100 users : 300$/month 101 - 500 users : 500$/month 501 – 2000 users : 1000$/month

Microsoft Sharepoint Accenture, Aéroport de Paris, Altran … ISV NC

Socialtext Very few clients SaaS & ISV NC

OpenText OpenText Few clients SNCF, BMW SaaS & ISV NC

Cisco Cisco Quad ? ISV SaaS in 2013 Mobile

NC

Lead

ers  

Strong  

performers  

Compe

((ve  

op(o

ns  

17  

Page 18: Social business study 2012

Business  model  Impacts on pricing & projects

Offerings types Implementation/ Integration Run (*)

Basic SaaS “Plug & play”

N/A no configuration effort no integration issue + change management

$ 50 to $ 150 /User /Year

SaaS or On-premise

K$ 10 to 50 and more… integration impact with the intranet and with other applications + extensive change management approach

$ 50 to $ 75 /User/ Year Examples: • Bluekiwi basic> 100 users: € 7,5 /U/month; 1 000 users: € 5 /U/month; 10 000 users: € 3,5/U/month • Yoolink > from € 2.5/U/month… • Yammer > 3 offerings: Fremium: free; Business: $5/U/month; Enterprise: NC

Opensource similar as Opensource collaborative intranet

N/A

(*) A minimum number of users is required

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n   18  

Page 19: Social business study 2012

19  [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Architecture  

Page 20: Social business study 2012

Strategic approach

IT approach

Business approach

Self-directed approach

Social IS Urbanization

Non-specialized solutions

Architecture  

•  2  trends,  apparently  contradictory  

20  

➜ Development of Enterprise Social initiatives ➜ Current IS rationalization issues for CIOs

•  4 architecture approaches ➜ Strategic approach ➜ IT approach ➜ Business approach ➜ “Individual”/self-directed approach

Market trend Organization, Business applications, processes & habits are “socializing”…

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 21: Social business study 2012

Architecture  

21  

4 Approaches that can be complementary

Strategic approach

IT approach

Business approach

Self-directed approach

Social IS architecture

Non-specialized solutions

Adapted from Lecko / Useo

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 22: Social business study 2012

22  [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Ecosystem  trends  

Page 23: Social business study 2012

Ecosystem  trends  

23  

Integration, Aggregation, Mobility & Analytics

Adapted from Lecko / Useo [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 24: Social business study 2012

24  [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Case  studies  

Page 25: Social business study 2012

Case  study  

1  of  the  largest  building  materials  company  47  000  ees  in  100  countries  (30  %  generaJon  X)    Issues    MulJple  acquisiJons  had  fragmented  the  company  Strategic  goals  require  fast  coordinated  global  responses      Output  CommuniJes  created  around  the  company’s  strategic  iniJaJves    8  000  acJves  users  A  truly  global  organizaJon  “Opera'onally,  we  work  as  individual  countries  and  regions  &  markets.  The  challenge  is  to  get  everyone  involved  regardless  of  loca'on,  job,  or  language.  [Social  media]  enables  us  to  develop  ini'a'ves  at  incredible  speed  by  taking  the  structure    of  the  company_and  a  person’s  place  in  the  organiza'on_out  of  the  discussion,    so  that  we  can  all  work  together  and  move  fast.  [Social  media]  creates  a  truly  global  organiza'on.”  Miguel  Lozano,  Director  of    InnovaJon  

25  

CEMEX

Gilberto Garcia, Head of Innovation

Adapted from Gartner, The social organisation

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 26: Social business study 2012

Case  study  

France  Telecom-­‐Orange  one  of  the  world’s  leading  telecommunicaJons  operators    172,000  employees  worldwide,  including  105,000  employees  in  France    Issues    Inside  :  develop  employees  trust  Market  impact  :  display  an  InnovaJve  brand  image        Output  Successful  pilote  since  2010  (35  000  acJve  members/200  000)  Features  are  steadily  increasing    Some  managers  became  Community  managers  Cross-­‐funcJonal  projects  developed  faster    

26  

ORANGE in France

Jean Daries, Director of project

Nota : SFR has launched its “social” intranet in 2008

Testimonial

Event : Salon Solutions RH, march 2012

[email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 27: Social business study 2012

27  [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Community  management  Focus  

Page 28: Social business study 2012

Case  study  –  GDF  SUEZ  feedback  for                              “Les  écohabitants”  

1st community web site in energy saving

Audience 20 000 visitors / month In 1 year : X2 15 000 ➜ 33 000 members

Main Features Simulation tools Teaching aids videos Blogs ➜ chat between members Forum ➜ exchange of views between members questions can be asked to GDF experts

Key success factors To Monitor

  Content : consistency & steadiness Relevant & appealing content ➜ to be relayed in blogs, press, etc.

  Animation : steadiness & appeal To nurture web site with new content

on a regular basis   Share : Spread content in many platforms ➜ to generate traffic to the web site  People : promote the members everywhere

in the web site

 Numbers of members vs Engagement (involvement & interactions)

  Negatives comments ➜ to be able to manage it quickly  Don’t minor the workload to manage

a community (tasks of watch, moderation, search for information, legal issues …)

28  

Page 29: Social business study 2012

Case  study  –  GDF  SUEZ  feedback  for                          “Les  écohabitants”  

People: promote the members

Spread content in many platforms ➜ to generate traffic to the web site

29  

Page 30: Social business study 2012

Key  success  factors  

 Build  the  community    Get  members  ac(ve    Lead  con(nuous  analysis  &  improvement  

Sources Synthesis from social influencers How Social Technologies drive business success, Google may 2012 7 myths about social media Blogs : Fred Cavazza Cyril Bladier Seth Godin

#1  

30  

#2  #3  

Page 31: Social business study 2012

#1  Build  the  community  

Recruit massively & Engage

relevant targets

  Define precise goals for the community   Engage relevant targets ie : existing communities on/off-line   Promote the community   Send a welcome pack : welcome mail with latest news & comments, quick start

guide, credentials, user guide   Build relationship with the influencers   Drop personal emails   Introduce members to each other

Feed relevant

  Relevant content attract people & get people to register   Tone of speech

  Personal and authentic to be close to the community   Ask for thoughts, suggestions and comments

to make people comment & interact

Attract

ATAWAD

  Share & spread content in several platforms generate traffic to the community   Social media (Twitter, LinkedIn, SlideShare …)   Corporate web site   Blogs of experts (employees, partners, HR gurus ..)   Press release   Invite people to register during events …

It’s not about membership count but about engagement and getting members active

31  

Page 32: Social business study 2012

#2  Get  members  ac(ve  

Create appealing content

Build a “real”

& “unique” relationship

with members

  Update content on a regular basis (2 to 3 times/week) avoid getting bored   Have a look & feel appealing with pictures, charts …   Make suggestions & ask questions to get members involved   Invite special guests to contribute: influencers, business experts   Let members be the first to get relevant info on the company (roadmap, product

launch)   Elaborate a reward & incentive policy see Appendix

  Usually a minority of members create content in online communities on a regular basis. Build a special relationship with them   Give a response to every comment   Thank & compliment members   Make them feel valued shine a spotlight on members who contribute   Create “usages” (see Twitter) “FM” & “FF” : “Follow Monday” or “Friday”; Welcome; “W Back” : Welcome back…   Select topic experts and shine a spotlight on them

Have an active community will naturally attract members

Make it simple !

  Remove everything the community doesn't need

32  

Page 33: Social business study 2012

33  [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Legal  Framework  

Page 34: Social business study 2012

Legal  framework  

 #1  Current  issues    #2  Best  prac(ces    #3  A  work  in  progress  

Sources Conferences “L’entreprise dans les réseaux sociaux : les clés d’une stratégie juridique gagnante”, co-animated by Mathieu Prud’homme, Web & Contentious Director. May, 16th 2012

“Community managers : Intéressez-vous au droit avant que le droit s’intéresse à vous …”, animated by Eric Barbry, Head of E-communication & Law. Comundi-University Paris Dauphine www.alain-bensoussan.com. May, 25th 2012

A legal framework to master & to challenge on a continuous basis

34  

Page 35: Social business study 2012

 #1  Issues  

Intellectual  property  

ReputaJon  Economic  intelligence  

Who‘s is the owner of the contribution members ? Who owns the intellectual property in co-design & crowdsourcing ?

Social media watch to know what is it said about the brand and its products, How to respond to attacks ?

Information leaks, Information gathered by competition through social media …

Legal Issues faced by a BtoB Company in Social Business

Adapted from Alain Bensoussan lawyers

Page 36: Social business study 2012

   #2  Best  prac(ces  

•  A  

Establish  the  rules  

Set  up  a  social  business  watch  –  in  house/outsourced  

Assign  a  referent  –  in  house/outsourced  

Have  a  strategy  !  

Establish the social media rules for the company employees & ecosystem.

Documents to elaborate or to amend : Information system guidelines (to amend) Service providers contracts (to amend)

Social media guide lines (employee + ecosystem) Community management guidelines Terms of use

Monitor what is said about the brand and its products & respond according to risk management : remove content by interacting with the web user or by taking legal action.

Community manager(s) and/or Social media manager. Have a legal watch. Establish guidelines : how to watch & monitor, moderate, interact.

Involve Legal, IT, Management, Communication & Marketing If a Social media is not selected or in a “wait & see” mode -> assess risk management (avoid cyber/typo squatting)

3 criteria to observe cost & ROI inhouse/outsourced legal issues 36  

Page 37: Social business study 2012

 #3  A  work  in  progress  It’s work in progress, as social media evolves

constantly

Every 3 months or so !

See Pinterest (similar to facebook, Twitter …) “Pinterest may, in its sole discretion, modify or update these Terms from time to time, and so you should review this page periodically”

See CNIL Content as member contributions have a duration &, at the end, have to be archived & anonymous. Traceability is strongly monitored.

See AFNOR A structure will be gave to members comments & contributions in 2012.

Each country, its law … European law should align with CNIL guidelines.

37  

Page 38: Social business study 2012

APPENDIX  

38  38 [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 39: Social business study 2012

Work  cited  How  social  technologies  are  extending  the  organiza'on  November  2011  McKinsey  Global  InsJtute  Online  survey  :  4,261  respondents    

Business  and  Web  2.0:  An  interac've  feature  December,  2010  McKinsey  Global  InsJtute    

The  social  organiza'on,  how  to  use  social  media  to  tap  the  collec've  genius  of  your  customers  and  employees  Anthony  J.  Bradley  and  Mark  P.  McDonald,  Gartner  INC,  2012  Published  by  Harvard  Business  Review  Press    

Urbanisa'on  du  SI  Social  :  entre  gouvernance,  technologie  et  usage  Etude  RSE  (Tome  4)  RSE  :  une  disparité  propice  à  un  ebulle  de  valeur  2.0  (Tome  3)  Lecko-­‐Useo,  2012  -­‐  2011    

Blog  LeWub,    hQp://lewub.net    

Press  :  LMI,  French  magazine  

39  [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

Page 40: Social business study 2012

Work  cited  

40  [email protected]  I  @enriquez_n  

The Enterprise Social Landscape Enters teen Years December 2011 By Rob Koplowitz hQp://blogs.forrester.com/rob_koplowitz/11-­‐09-­‐12-­‐   Synthesis from social influencers on BtoB mainly How Social Technologies drive business success, Google may 2012 Myths about social media : http://blog.marketo.com/blog/2011/10/b2b-social-media-myths-my-favorite-lessons-from-jay-baer-at-marketingsherpas-b2b-summit.html http://socialmediab2b.com/2012/01/b2b-social-media-myth/ Blogs Fred Cavazza Cyril Bladier Seth Godin