56
Smoke Detection Solutions for Challenging Environments

Smoke detection in challenging environments

  • Upload
    -

  • View
    1.039

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Smoke Detection Solutions for Challenging Environments

Page 2: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Trade-offs for Optimum Protection

Challenging Environments

Available Technologies

Open-area Smoke Imaging Detection and Applications ─ Technology overview

─ Field-proven applications

Industrial Very Early Warning Smoke Detection ─ Detection approaches

─ Deploying ASD in industrial environments

─ Field-proven applications

─ ASD criteria matrix

Q & A

Agenda

2

Page 3: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Optimum Protection Requires a Balance

3

Fire Triangle

Detection Triangle

Challenging environments complicate achieving optimum protection

Page 4: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Provides the highest level of detection to ensure protection of… ─ Life

─ Property

─ Business continuity

─ Environment

Without false alarms that ─ Create disruptive false or nuisance alarms

─ De-sensitize personnel and occupants to alarms

─ Ultimately leading to disregarding alarms or disabling safety systems

─ Place an extra burden on local first responders

At an affordable cost ─ Initial installation cost

─ Long term operating, servicing, and testing costs

The Detection Triangle

4

Page 5: Smoke detection in challenging environments

A ‘Challenging Environment’ is a space where:

Detection is difficult due to:

─ Environmental conditions that cause false and nuisance alarms

─ Environmental conditions that shorten detector life

─ High and variable airflows

─ High ceilings

Detector sensitivity and longevity are compromised in

‘harsh’ environments due to:

─ Dirt and dust

─ Temperature extremes

─ High EMI

─ Moisture, fog, steam, water condensation

─ Birds and insects

─ Building movement

─ Sunlight

─ Detector location

─ Toxic and corrosive gases

Challenging Environments

5

Page 6: Smoke detection in challenging environments

A ‘Challenging Environment’ is a space where:

Maintenance is difficult

─ Extreme environmental conditions

─ Inaccessible areas

● High ceilings

● Roof or floor spaces

● Within elevator shafts

● Equipment racks

─ Restricted access

● High security areas

● Production areas

● 24/7/365 operation

Unobtrusive detection is required

─ To prevent vandalism or tampering

─ Not disruptive to architectural designs

─ Preservation of historic buildings and artifacts

Evacuation may be challenging

─ High concentration of large number of people

─ Exit paths are restricted

─ Occupants require assistance

Challenging Environments

6

Page 7: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Detection Technologies Overview in Challenging Environments – Large Open Spaces

7

Relative ranking: 5 = best / most desirable

Driver ASD OSID Beam VSD Laser Spot Flame L. Heat

Sensitivity to smoke 5 3 2 2 4 2 1 1

Prevent damage to structure 5 3 3 3 3 2 1 1

Prevent damage to contents (equip,

product, etc.) 5 3 3 3 3 2 1 1

Foreign particle rejection (dust, fog,

water, etc) 5 4 2 3 2 2 4 5

Foreign object rejection 5 5 2 4 5 5 5 5

Resistance to building movement 5 4 2 4 5 5 5 5

Operation in all lighting conditions 5 4 2 2 5 5 3 5

Equipment Cost 3 5 5 1 2 3 1 3

Installation costs 3 5 4 4 2 2 4 3

Maintenance costs 4 4 2 4 2 2 4 5

Total 45 40 27 30 33 30 29 34

Page 8: Smoke detection in challenging environments

New Advancements in Open-area Detection

8

Open-area Smoke Imaging Detection

Technical obstacles overcome

Applications

Industrial Very Early Warning Smoke Detection

Detection technology overview

New advancements in VEWSD for industrial

environments

Field-proven applications

ASD requirements matrix

Page 9: Smoke detection in challenging environments

False alarms due to…

Dirt

Dust

Steam

Insects

Banners

Fork lift trucks

9

Challenges with Beam Detectors

Ladders

Watermist Spray

Building movement

Building vibration

Sunlight

Reflected sunlight

Page 10: Smoke detection in challenging environments

The improvements over traditional beam detectors stem from four core design ideas:

Dual-wavelength light frequencies

Digital imaging vs. photodiodes

A unique method for aligning

Smarter algorithms

10

What Makes Dual-wavelength Different

Page 11: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Large particle obscuration rejection

Use of UV & IR in specific wavelengths assist in evaluating whether

obscuration is caused by small particles in the physical size resembling

smoke or from larger particle (i.e. dust, steam, insects, fork-lift, ladders,

etc.)

Tolerance to building shift and vibration

The multiple pixels of a CMOS imaging chip as opposed to a photodiode

along with the uniquely coded light beam from an emitter provides the

ability to track the position and tolerate movement

Foreign light intrusion

The Imager is fitted with a dyed glass filter, designed to be almost opaque

except to all but two wavelengths of interest

11

Overcoming Conventional Challenges

Page 12: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Emitter

Obstruction

Dust

Smoke Imager

UV beam

IR beam

Active emitter LEDs transmit wide beam IR and UV to the Imager

– IR and UV have differing wavelengths

– Respond differently to smoke

Relative strengths of the UV & IR are compared

– Detect smoke

– Discriminate against particulates that cause nuisance alarms on traditional beams

Software locates illuminated pixels on the CMOS imager

– Each emitter is uniquely coded

Imager software tracks building movement

– No controlled motor drives

12

Dual-wavelength vs. Single IR Beam

Page 13: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Imager versus photodiode

One imager equals 100,000’s

of photodiodes

An Imager locates and tracks

the position of an emitter

anywhere in its field of view at

pixel level

Can operate reliably in all

lighting conditions; bright day /

sunlight to total darkness

Emitters

Actual view from a 45 degree imager with 4

emitters in a 13,500 sq ft area

13

Powerful Benefits

Page 14: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Simple and easy installation using a unique Laser Alignment Tool

─ Requires only rough alignment due to the wide angle of view of the

imager(s)

─ Up to 70% time saving compared to traditional beams

Beam length up to 492 ft

─ Outperforming traditional beams by up to 50%

14

Installation & Commissioning

Page 15: Smoke detection in challenging environments

15

OR

Installation & Commissioning

Page 16: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Real Field Challenges

Overcome by Open-area

Smoke Imaging Detection

Page 17: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Long Distances

Reliably detecting at 497 ft

Allows for 20% setting at 430 ft

Aligned through metal support

structure of the roof

17

Page 18: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Industrial Site

18

6”/15 cm

End-user was considering

linear heat cable for

‘controlled’ burn down…

Page 19: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Metro Station and Tunnel

5,85 “/15 cm

75ft/23 m

69ft/21m

187 ft/57 m

High ceiling

Low ceiling

46 ft/14 m

See effect of whirling dust

when metro comes into

the station

19

Page 20: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Cathedral York Minster

5,85 “/15 cm

Reliably detecting on 72

feet high on distance of

400 ft

Fire tests

20

Page 21: Smoke detection in challenging environments

5,85 “/15 cm

Effect of six Viking-style torches.

Nuisance or alarm, now you

know and choose

21

Cathedral York Minster

Page 22: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Semi-open Warehouse

22

Example of the effect of condensation

on the emitter

No differentiation between IR and UV

and hence no alarm nor faults

Page 23: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Chicken Farm

5,85 “/15 cm

Spikes with up to 20% when

chickens run around.

Estimated time between

cleaning of lenses 2-3 month

23

Page 24: Smoke detection in challenging environments

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

0

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

0

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

0

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

1

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

2

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

3

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

4

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

4

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

4

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

6

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

6

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

7

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

7

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

8

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

9

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:0

9

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

0

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

0

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

2

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

2

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

2

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

4

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

4

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

4

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

6

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

6

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

6

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

8

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:1

8

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

0

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

0

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

0

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

0

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

2

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

2

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

4

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

4

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

4

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

6

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

6

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

6

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

6

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

8

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

8

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

8

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:2

9

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:3

0

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:3

0

16/0

2/2

012 0

0:3

0

Series1

Series2 IR Att

Carton Printing Facility

24

Water mist is sprayed every few

minutes to maintain a humid

environment

This happens 24/7, the water mist is

causing false alarms on installed

beams

UV Att

Page 25: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Recycling Plant

5,85 “/15 cm

Estimated time between

cleaning of lenses 1 month

25

Page 26: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Recycling plant 2

5,85 “/15 cm

Providing the best solutions means

also knowing what does NOT work

and exactly WHY

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

23/12 10:48 23/12 12:00 23/12 13:12 23/12 14:24 23/12 15:36 23/12 16:48 23/12 18:00 23/12 19:12 23/12 20:24 23/12 21:36 23/12 22:48 24/12 0:00 24/12 1:12 24/12 2:24 24/12 3:36 24/12 4:48

Att

en

uati

on

(%

)

Date/Time

IR Atten

UV Atten

26

Page 27: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Direct Sunshine

5,85 “/15 cm

Disregarding the ‘avoid East – West

direction’ recommendations, Dual

Wavelength only generates a

saturation fault when exposed directly

to the sun.

27

Page 28: Smoke detection in challenging environments

New Advances in Open-area Detection

28

Open-area Smoke Imaging Detection

Technical obstacles overcome

Applications

Industrial Very Early Warning Smoke Detection

Detection approaches

Deploying ASD in industrial environments

Field proven installations

ASD requirements matrix

Page 29: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Technology Approaches to Very Early Warning Smoke Detection

Detection Approaches

− Absolute

− Adaptive

Impact on Detector Performance

− Fixed thresholds

− Drift compensation / dynamic thresholds

− Dust rejection

System Integrity

29

Page 30: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Continued…

Xtralis detectors use clever patented methods to ensure all optical

surfaces are free from contamination throughout their life

Clean air barrier protects optical surfaces

Eliminates detector drift

Consistent & predictable alarm thresholds

Field adjustable, fixed detection thresholds

Absolute Detection

Page 31: Smoke detection in challenging environments

1. Establish background levels

2. Select alarm thresholds

Dirty Environments Establishing Fixed Alarm Thresholds

Fire 1

Alert

Action

Background

Fire 2

Smoke test

31

Page 32: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Mathematic algorithms used to compensate for detector drift caused by

non smoke particles entering the smoke chamber or electrical

interference induced into the detection system

Short term events

Long term drift

Drift compensated alarm thresholds

Adaptive Detection - Drift Compensation

32

Page 33: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Drift Compensation Risks

Alert Level

95 min

145 min

Drift compensation can result in

significant detection delay

1

2

3

Detector output

33

Page 34: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Approaches used to compensation for dirty backgrounds

─ System pipe network design

─ Background compensation

─ Filtration

─ Maintenance

─ Particle size rejection

Particle size

Smoke Dust

Part

icle

Num

ber

Smoke detector patents for particle size discrimination

US 7564365: Marman & Eggers - GE Security

US 7483139: Powell - Kidde IP Holdings

34

Dust – an Environmental Challenge

Page 35: Smoke detection in challenging environments

The Conundrum:

Rejecting smoke, dust, or both?

Particle size

Smoke Dust

Part

icle

Num

ber

Typically

Smoke 0.1 – 6 m

Dust 1 – 100+ m

Mulholland, G.W. , SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection

Engineering 2nd Ed, Ch 15, Section 2.

Lide, D.R. (1994) , Characteristics of Particles and

Particle Dispersoids, Handbook of Chemistry and

Physics, 75th Ed.

35

Dust Rejection – an Environmental Challenge

Page 36: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Dust rejection may result in reduction in

detector sensitivity

1 ”A comparison of Aspirated Smoke Detectors. Honeywell

FAAST Detectors and Xtralis VESDA VLF LaserFocus”

Conducted by Packer Engineering, Inc and The Fire

Testing Evaluation Center at The University of Maryland,

College Park, Nov 2010

Adaptive vs Absolute Detection

36

Adaptive Detection

Absolute Detection

Dust Rejection – the Consequences

Page 37: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Sample Holes

Return-air Grill

1 NA: No Alarm within 300sec

Test ID

Response Time (sec)

Absolute

Detection

Adaptive

Detection

1 188 sec – Alert NA1

2 220 sec – Alert NA

3 132 sec – Alert NA

4 178 sec – Alert NA

Test

ID

Test Fire

Time to Alarm (sec)

Absolute Detection Adaptive Detection

Alert Action Fire Alert Action 1 Action 2

5 Timber -smoldering 590 787 NA1 799 NA NA

6 PU foam -smoldering 628 876 NA NA NA NA

7 PU foam -flaming 140 167 198 190 NA NA

8 Heptane - flaming 78 143 266 175 NA NA

9 Paper – smoldering 660 NA NA NA NA NA Tests witnessed by Centre for Environmental Safety

and Risk Engineering (CESARE), Victoria University,

Melbourne, AU 37

Adaptive vs. Absolute Detection

Page 38: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Electrical integrity

Detection chamber

Pipe network flow monitoring

- Ensure that it cannot be by-

passed

Filter life monitoring (currently on

the market)

- No monitoring

- Time based

- Particle counting

- Through filter flow monitoring

The FACP says these detectors are

fully functional

38

System Integrity – Critical Functions Must be Monitored

Page 39: Smoke detection in challenging environments

System Integrity – time based filter monitoring

Unsupervised Detection Failure 39

Sensitivity vs. Filter Loading Cycle

Page 40: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Intelligent Filtration

Larger x% of flow passes through

HEPA filter

Smaller y% of flow passes

unfiltered

Flows recombined

to enter detector at lower

obscuration than original

Pipe Flow Splits into x% and y%

Flow Sensors

Air coming directly from sampling pipe

(total airflow)

Reduce contaminates

entering detection chamber

Innovative flow partitioning

and HEPA filtration

Continuous monitoring of

filter and airflow

Optimum detector sensitivity

over detector life.

Page 41: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Very Early Warning Smoke Detection in Industrial Environments

Page 42: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Perceptions of ASD

ASD Comfort Zone (Roots in Data Center and Telecommunications)

Uncomfortable Zone (Industrial)

Dirty Clean

Designed for the cleaner environments

Industrial applications beyond ASD capabilities

Market skepticism still exist

Historically ASD system designs in all industrial

environments required system application engineering 42

Page 43: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Improved general protection

− Hardened product enclosure – IP/NEMA rated

− Eliminate need for secondary enclosures

Longer pipe run to accommodate larger facilities

Greater visibility of status LED

Improved filtration

− External filtration can stress system maintenance

− Eliminate need for external filters

Field serviceable modules

− Less down time

− Lower spare part inventory

Lower long term operating costs

Establish standard to quantify contamination resistance

43

Industrial Applications Require More from ASD

Page 44: Smoke detection in challenging environments

IP54 Enclosure

Intelligent filtration

1,200 ft. pipe runs

High intensity status LED

Field serviceable – modular

construction

44

Fit for purpose Industrial ASD

Page 45: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Enhanced filtration & IP-rated enclosure

can reduce Total Cost of Ownership by 40 to 60%

In-line Filters

Detectors inside protective enclosures No protective enclosures required

No In-line Filters

45

New Approach to ASD in Industrial Environments

Page 46: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Filters

Aspirator

Detection chamber

Fewer spare parts – less down time

Electronics

46

Modularity Delivers Lower Total Cost of Ownership

Page 47: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Power Plant – USA

Steel Mill – USA

47

Industrial Installations

Illovo Sugar Mill – South Africa

Cook Colliery – Australia

Page 48: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Boiler Feed Pump

ASD Protected from extreme

heat via pipe network

Battery rooms

ASD + hydrogen gas detection

48

Power Plant

Page 49: Smoke detection in challenging environments

300 foot tunnel under electric reheat

furnace

Furnace utilizes nitrogen protective

atmosphere – risk of oxygen

depletion (asphyxiation)

Cable trays – risk of fire

Solution: Industrial ASD + Oxygen

49

Steel Mill – Tunnel Protection

Page 50: Smoke detection in challenging environments

ASD Detector in

Protective Enclosure

Industrial ASD

Detector

50

Illovo Sugar Mill – Pipe Network Design & Installation

Page 51: Smoke detection in challenging environments

51

Cook Colliery – Underground Mine

Page 52: Smoke detection in challenging environments

52

Cook Colliery – Pipe Network Design

Page 53: Smoke detection in challenging environments

53

Cook Colliery Installation

Page 54: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Clean

Dirty

High

Contamination

Computer / Control / Clean

Rooms / Data / Telco

Switch Rooms /

Warehousing

Conveyor / Mining

/ Other

Switch / Substation / Warehousing / Factory / Recycling / Processing /

Manufacturing / Power Gen / Conveyor / Mining , High Dust, Etc.

Additional considerations

may be required

In-line filters (Optional)

Contamination

Bagasse / Coal/

Underground

- Various Manufacturing and

Warehousing Applications -

Fertilizer / Paper / Steel /

Tunnels / Etc.

Semi Conductor / Communication /

Control / Data

May require

some

applications

engineering

In-line filter

Evolution of ASD Applications

Page 55: Smoke detection in challenging environments

55

ASD requirement matrix

De

tec

tor

1

De

tec

tor

2

De

tec

tor

3

- Consistent Alarm Thresholds over detector life

- Determinate alarm thresholds (% obs/ft or %obs/m)

- Ability to compensate for background levels

- Flow system monitoring that cannot be by-passed

- Active filter life monitoring

- Quantified contamination resistance (for industrial)

Proposed contamination test

Dust type: per ASHRAE 52.2

Dust loading density: 16mg per cubic meter

Test cycle: (dust - clean air - smoke)

Dust duration: 3.5 hours

Clean air: 30 minutes

Smoke test: smouldering cotton - two exposures

Number of test cycles: 10

Allowable sensitivity drift: <15%

Proposed ASD Criteria Selection Matrix

Page 56: Smoke detection in challenging environments

Q & A

56