Click here to load reader
Upload
itcool82
View
439
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1Copyright © 2004 Accenture. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2004 AssetEconomics. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved.
Source: October 2002 survey of 245 companies - CFO Research Services
Common Capability GapsEPM Capability Satisfaction Rate
1. Alignment between company strategy and their planning process (40%)
2. Focus on key business drivers (24%)
3. Amount of time required to create the annual plan (47%)
4. Speed and accuracy of the forecasting processes (48%)
5. Ability to produce business models and test impact of proposed changes (31%)
6. Speed and accuracy of the monthly financial reporting (63%)
7. Reporting of non-financial measures (28%)
8. Ability of business users to view and analyze performance reports at will (25%)
9. Integrated IT systems to collect and manage the information (41%)
10. Visibility into current results (29%)
11. Understanding of future performance trends (30%)
Research shows that corporate executives are deeply dissatisfied with their current Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) capabilities.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
2Copyright © 2004 Accenture. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2004 AssetEconomics. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved.
Future Value affects all industries, with most companies in a management space somewhere between eBay and a coal mine.
“Intangibles” $ (MV-IC+GW)
Fu
ture
Val
ue
$
The solution? Future systems focus on current and future value from all assets with an integrated solution driving sustainable high performance.
The problem? Current systems focus on current value and tangible assets with point solutions and traditional measures of financial performance.
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000
3Copyright © 2004 Accenture. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2004 AssetEconomics. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved.
Why? The asset base has changed dramatically: accounting management systems ignore and under-manage value creating assets.
Statutory Reporting vs. Performance Reporting Information Requirements
Tracking by accounting systems
Not tracked by accounting systems
Source: AssetEconomics Holdings Inc
4Copyright © 2004 Accenture. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2004 AssetEconomics. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved.
Intellectual and Intangibles Assets behave very differently and need to be managed very differently than traditional accounting assets
5Copyright © 2004 Accenture. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2004 AssetEconomics. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved.
Changing Economies, Business Models, and Value Drivers
Monetary Physical Relational Organizational Human
Value Chain
Value Network
Value Shop
1 These asset classifications will be further defined in the upcoming slides.
Value Chain
Key Asset Value Drivers1
Business Models
Knowledge EconomyIndustrial EconomyType of Economy
PresentPast
Additionally, the economy has changed bringing along new business models and different value drivers.
6Copyright © 2004 Accenture. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2004 AssetEconomics. Patent Pending. All Rights Reserved.
Current systems do not do a good job at helping you plan for what may occur and track the key drivers to enable decision making.
Note that all totals do not sum to 100% due to rounding
33%We do not
measure their performance
41%We apply some measures but
mainly informal or qualitative
20%We apply
some measures but
it’s not organized
5%We have a
robust system
This is surprising given that these same executives admitted that intangibles were critical for their future success in creating shareholder value.
Does your company measure the performance of Its intangible assets?
Compare how your ideal company would measure, manage, or disclose intangibles to your own company.
Accenture/Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) Survey 2003
85%
59%Gap
53%Gap
Measurement Management Disclosure
26%
59%Gap
Ideal Company | My Company Ideal Company | My Company Ideal Company | My Company
90%
31%
71%
18%