Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
CMMi and Scrum will be the fundation for ongoing sustainable improvement of organizations.
Citation preview
presented by
Scrum Meets CMMI/MPS.BR ?
ScrumGathering Sao Paulo, May 2009
How to combine Scrum and CMMi to achieve the excellence in Software Development
Ana RouillerBoris Gloger
Ana about Boris:
“Boris is a CMMi person doing Scrum!”
Boris about Ana:
“Ana is a Scrum person doing CMMi!”
Regions, where we started to combineCMMi/MPS.BR and Scrum
let´s start ...
Why do we believe that Scrum and CMMi will enable small companies in Brazil to grow?
TEAM
The Traditional Way to
Implement Scrum
PB
Sprint # 4
Sprin
t Pla
nnin
g 2
Sprin
tSp
rint
Retr
o-
Sprin
t Pla
nnin
g 1 .......
Estim
atio
n M
eetin
g
VISION
Product Idea
The Scrum Flow
Releaseplan
Product Backlog
Sprint # 1 Sprint # 2 Sprint # 3
PR O D U C T O W N E R
PB PBPB PB
9:00
12:00
18:00
Day 1
Do your Daily Scrum every day! Do your Daily Scrum every day! Do your Daily Scrum every day!Sp
rint P
lann
ing
2
Sprin
tRe
view
Sprin
tRe
tro-
spec
tive
Sprin
t Pla
nnin
g 1
Estim
atio
n M
eetin
g
Estim
atio
n M
eetin
g
Estim
atio
n M
eetin
g
Estim
atio
n M
eetin
g
Estim
atio
n M
eetin
g
Estim
atio
n M
eetin
g
Estim
atio
n M
eetin
g
Release
Version 1.2
Releaseplan Update
version 0.0 version 1.0 version 1.2 version 2.0
C U S T O M E R C U S T O M E R
C U S T O M E R
M A N A G E R
M A N A G E R M A N A G E R
.......
Sprin
t Pla
nnin
g 2
Sprin
tRe
view
Sprin
tRe
tro-
spec
tive
Sprin
t Pla
nnin
g 1 .......
Sprin
t Pla
nnin
g 2
Sprin
tRe
view
Sprin
tRe
tro-
spec
tive
Sprin
t Pla
nnin
g 1 .......
T E A M
SC R U M M A S T E R
U S E R U S E R
WHAT to do - Sprint Planning 1
PB
Analyse
HOW to do - Sprint Planning 2 CHECK it - Daily Scrum
version 0.0 version 1.0 version 1.3 version 2.0
©2009
Understand
T E A M
85
138203
5
4013 3
0
8
100?20
5 2
1
PlanningPoker
SIZE it - Estimation Meeting
Play!
PB
prioritized
Tactical Level
Strategic Level
PB
Estim
atio
n M
eetin
g
Scrum is most only
used to run a project on
team or multi-team
level
MO TUMO WE TH FRTUMO TU WE TH FR
Training
PO-Roll
BacklogPrep
Estim.
Prio
SP 1
SP 2
PRODUCT OWNE
R
PRODUCT OWNE
R
SCRUM MASTER
TEAM
PRODUCT OWNE
R
TEAM
PRODUCT OWNE
R
SCRUM MASTER
TEAM
TEAM
SCRUM MASTER
Rev
Retro
BacklogPrep
Estim.
TEAM
PRODUCT OWNE
R
TEAMPRODUCT OWNE
R
company backlog and larger Scrum Set-UP
synchronization of teams
Sprint planning 1
Sprint planning 2
Product Owner Team
There is no clear understanding about
how to mature organizations
Problem of Scrum Implementation
The Traditional Way to Implement CMMi
!"#$%&$'()&(*+,-+.$/'01.$2&,3(4-+$%&$/&56-#-78#$
/9.$9&#&(:8;:-<&(78$%&$/&56-#-78#$=>.$>8;6?@8$
=A4(-4+$"B.$B(7&),+?@8$%&$",8%678$
C'/.$C&,-D4+?@8$C!E.$C+;-%+?@8$
!"#$%&$!F8-8.$G1.$2&,3(4-+$%&$G8(D)6,+?@8$""0!.$2+,+(H+$%+$06+;-%+%&$$$$$$$$$$$$$$%&$",84&##8$&$",8%678$
1!.$1&%-?@8$&$!(I;-#&$$9!/.$!(I;-#&$%&$9&4-#@8$$
&$/6?@8$G!/.$!(I;-#&$%&$G+6#+$&$
$$$$$$$$$/6?@8$
4: Gerenciado Quantitativamente$OPP, QPM
3: Definido$RD, TS, PI, VER, VAL, OT, OPF, OPD, IPM, RSKM, DAR
2: Gerenciado$REQM, PP, PMC, SAM, MA, PPQA,CM
1: Inicial$
5: Otimizando$OID, CAR
!"#$%&$2&,3(4-+$%&$",84&##8.$J"K.$K848$(8$",84&##8$$$$$$$$$$J,)+(-L+4-8(+;$J"9.$9&D(-?@8$%8$",84&##8$$$$$$$$$$$J,)+(-L+4-8(+;$J=.$=,&-(+<&(78$J,)+(-L+4-8(+;$J"".$9&#&<F&(*8$%8$",84&##8$$$$$$$$$$J,)+(-L+4-8(+;$JB9.$B(8:+?@8$&$1&;*8,-+$$$$$$$$$J,)+(-L+4-8(+;$
!"#$%&$2&,3(4-+$%&$",8M&78.$"".$";+(&M+<&(78$%&$",8M&78$"1G.$!48<F+(*+<&(78$&$$$$$$$$$$G8(7,8;&$%&$",8M&78$>!1.$2&,3(4-+$%&$!48,%8#$$$$$$$$$$$48<$K8,(&4&%8,&#$B"1.$2&,3(4-+$B(7&),+%+$%&$",8M&78$/>N1.$2&,3(4-+$%&$/-#48$0"1.$2&,3(4-+$06+(H7+H:+$%&$",8M&78$$
5: Otimizando
4: Ger. Quant.
3: Definido
2: Gerenciado
1: Executado
0: Incompleto J"K$$J"9$$OOO$$""$$"1G$$OOO$$9!/$$G!/$
PQR$ST:&-#$%&$G+F+4-%+%&.$
PUR$ST:&-#$%&$1+76,-%+%&.$
/&F,&#&(7+?@8$
'#7+)-+%+$$$86$$$G8(V(6+$
$$$$$$$%&$$W,&+#$%&$",84&##8$
PXXR$W,&+#$%&$",84&##8$P!"#R.$
---
---
---
---
---
---
G11B$Y$>'Z>[$:\O\$
!"#$%&'(&)*#$*+,($*#-&
+-.&&/$0',.,#-.&
!"#$%&1-(2%-($3&
4($*#-&25%5&-.&&/$0',.,#-.
65#%,7&+$&/5.#%$5",8,+5+$&-'&9,.#$(5&+$&:;-(25*<5($*#-&+$&/$0',.,#-.&
/$0',.,#-.&
65*#$%&/5.#%$5($*#-&
=,+,%$;,-*58&&/$0',.,#-.&&
>+$*4?;5%&>*;-*.,.#@*;,5.&
$*#%$&&A%5"58<-&+-&B%-C$#-&$&/$0',.,#-.&
D$%$*;,5%
&6'+5*E5.
&/$0',.,#-.
Does not effect the people (teams) that
really do Software
Problem of CMMi Impl. Level 2
TEAM
Why not bringing both worlds together?
Scrum CMMi
2009
Start of two movements inside the company ....
... in the same time!
CMMi
Scrum
1. Run Scrum in Teams
2. Do CMMi in the Organization
Modelling the Business
Where do we go?
Start an SEPG
Measurement and Analysis System
Our Observations
5ª Sprint em andamento.
•! Melhoria das estimativas.
•! Melhoria da comunicação.
•! Time comprometido.
•! Disseminação do conhecimento.
•! Conhecimento antecipado dos riscos.
•! Melhoria na qualidade do produto
•! Melhoria da qualidade de vida dos desenvolvedores e
técnicos
Resultados
•! Visibilidade Pública.
•! Estimativas melhores.
•! Comunicação melhorada (Reuniões mais
frequentes, melhor Integração da Empresa).
•! Trabalho em Equipe.
•! Participação do Product Owner.
•! Organização das Idéias.
•! Estórias pequenas mas gerênciaveis (menos
incerteza e acompanhamento do PO)
•! Satisfação de concluir tarefas e estórias (estórias
com fim).
2
Resultados
•! Melhoramos o conhecimento sobre Scrum.
•! Muitas dúvidas já solucionadas.
•! Já achamos que sabemos como fazer melhor os
backlogs, estimativas, SP1, SP2, reviews e
demos.
•! Ainda não achamos o ponto de sintonia da Daily
Scrum.
•! Estimativas ainda são muito falhas.
•! XP goela abaixo: aumento de produtividade e
redução dos bugs.
Ínsula Tecnologia da Informação
Some Results from a workshop of companies in Maringa!
We observed ....
Rework that was 50% was down to 5%
0
12,5
25
37,5
50
2007
2008
2009
We observed ....
We became more mature quickly because the life cycle is
much shorter and all people have been involved.
We observed ....
control of urgency went to organizational level
We observed ....
We used the PDCA for all people in the organization
We observed ....
The improvements have been based on
objective data
We observed ....
In March 2010 we will publish the results about what will have happened in at least 30 companies
We observed ....
copyright by:Boris Gloger, Baden-Baden, GermanyAna Rouiller, SWQuality, Recife, Brazil
get in contact with us:[email protected]
