Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
for IDS class December 1, 2011
Citation preview
CURRENT US FOREIGN POLICY, TRADE, AND ADVOCACY ISSUES
RELATED TO COLOMBIAPlan Colombia
US Military Bases in ColombiaUS-Colombia Free Trade Agreement
Rev. Shannan R. Vance-OcampoFor Interdenominational Theological Seminary
December 1, 2011
Issue #1Plan Colombia
• Signed into law by President Clinton in 2000, conceived by President Pastrana in Colombia
• Conservatively, over 7Billion in aid since 2000 the vast majority of it given to military for “security enhancement in Colombia”
• Seen as a success by US/Colombia in that the business climate is better, FARC/ELN are on the run (sidelined), and there is a “more favorable” security situation
• Billions of US dollars transferred to Colombian military—much of the time under the Uribe Presidency
• Paramilitary “demobilization” occurred during this time period• Colombian scandals erupted during this time: parapolitics,
falsos positivos (over 1000 cases so far, and counting), wiretapping and interference with judiciary
• #1 focus was to sharply lesson drug production
“Collateral Damage” during Plan Colombia
Economics of Plan Colombia
• Initial aid package called for just 51% of aid to be military, 32% to fight drug trade, 16% social/economic, and the small remainder for a negotiated solution to the political conflict
• In final package, just over 78% went to military and the percentage has never dipped below this level
• Colombia looked for aid from other countries at this time, did receive some, but mostly on “development” side
• Focus for Colombia was on creating a new climate in Colombia to prime it for business from overseas
“Demobilization” in Colombia
How to Keep Up-to-Date on this Issue:• Latin America Working Group www.lawg.org
• Washington Office on Latin America www.wola.org/program/andes
• Adam Isacson’s podcasts (on iTunes) www.wola.org/wola_podcast
• Adam Isacson’s ten-year anniversary report on Plan Colombia, “Don’t Call it a Model” http://justf.org/files/pubs/notmodel.pdf
• This is an over-arching US policy towards Colombia that touches everything else—so keep this policy in mind as you hear/read about Colombia in the future or in what you see in Colombia as you accompany
Bridge Issue: Human Rights Certification and Military Aid
US Law requires a yearly certification by the State Department of the human rights situation in countries that receive US aid (Leahy Amendment) which is attached to
the Foreign Appropriations Acts since 1997“None of the funds made available by this Act may be provided to any unit of the security
forces of a foreign country if the Secretary of State has credible evidence that such unit has committed gross violations of human rights, unless the Secretary determines and reports to the Committees on Appropriations that the government of such country is
taking effective measures to bring the responsible members of the security forces unit to justice.”
Defense Appropriations: Covers Training Foreign Operations Appropriations: Weapons Funding and Training
FOR Report of 2010 shows direct linkages between US Military Aid and Gross Human Rights Violations in Colombia
http://forusa.org/content/report-military-assistance-human-rights-colombia-us-accountability-global-implications
Issue #2US Military Bases in Colombia
• OVERALL ISSUE: Since 2000, US has spent more than 7B in Colombia, over 80% of it as military aid.
• OVERALL ISSUE: The UNHCR estimates over 5M internally displaced persons in Colombia. Highest-second highest in world (# fluctuates back and forth with Sudan).
• Signed by President Uribe (Colombia) and Obama (U.S.A.) in October 2009– Later development was in August of 2010 when Colombian Constitutional
Court said it was a “treaty” needing Congressional ratification (this only pertains to Colombia)—SO IT IS IN LEGAL LIMBO NOW!
• Permits US use of 7(+) Colombian bases (existing) for a ten-year period• Bases are of various types (land, air, sea)• US legislation officially caps US personnel to 600 military, 800 contractors/advisors
—Base Agreement nullifies this• Diplomatic immunity on US personnel (military and civilian)• No environmental impact studies, immunity from impact• Does not prohibit use of bases for activity in Colombia and/or internationally• Leave bases “as is” at end of 10-year agreement• Follows the loss of US military bases in Panama and Ecuador• There is PC(USA) policy language from 2010 against this
Highlights of US/Colombia Base Agreement
“We are concerned therefore that the democratic security promoted by the current governement, the increased military cost, and the growth of the army have not shown us the prospect of peace even though they have reduced the actions of illegal armed groups. It is evident that there is a resurgence or strengthening of former armed groups. Furthermore, there are tensions with Colombia's neighbors - Ecuador, Venezuela, and throughout the region - because of the announcement of the US Army's use of Colombian military bases.”
-IPC National Synod Meeting, Feb. 2010
View of the IPC on the Bases
• Officially the Base Agreement remains unimplemented • What this means is that “previous military agreements remain in
force”• FY 2010 (September) signed contracts for 2.5M in construction on
Colombian bases (location classified)• US has for FY 2011 $14M for an “integrated logistics center” via a
FMS (Foreign Military Sales) account. Money spent by Colombians, but with US intelligence info on the Colombian base shared freely—probably using US contractors
• Doubling in spending by Army Corp of Engineers in Central/South America since 2009
• Integration of armed forces (US/Colombian) is already happening on Colombian bases
• September 2009—US is working on aviation parts on Colombia bases to be sourced to Afghanistan
• US training Latin American military personnel on Colombian bases (a la SOA)
Where are the Bases today?
How to Keep Up-to-Date on this Issue:
• FOR’s Research Project on Colombia & Militarism www.forcolombia.org/bases
• Also FOR blog on Colombia: http://forusa.org/groups/campaigns/end-us-military-aid-colombia
• Witness for Peace tracks this issue: http://witnessforpeace.org/section.php?id=98
• Presbyterian Peace Fellowship also tracks this: www.presbypeacefellowship.org
Issue #3US-Colombia Free Trade Agreement
• Passed by Congress on October 12, 2011, Signed by President Obama October 13, 2011
• Labor Action Plan signed by Obama/Santos, non-binding• 51 trade unionists killed in 2010, 18 so far this year• PC(USA) policy language against this as well as IPC policy
language • FTA’s are nearly impossible to be undone once implemented• Some estimates are that rural poverty will increase by 35% in
some zones once fully implemented (in Colombia)• Impossible to show any uptick on US jobs in this FTA• Potentiality to undo much of the US foreign policy “gains” via
Plan Colombia (drug eradication)• PPF has been a leading US-based organization working against
the FTA over the last six months.
Buenaventura, Colombia• Largest port in Colombia• Thought to be the center of the cocaine
trade in terms of export• Huge port—large area for legal trade of
goods in and out of Colombia—yet most of the city is impoverished, and is thought to be one of the most dangerous places to live in Colombia
• Serviced by a road from Cali (mining in mountains, environmental damage, road widening project—displacement)
• Area is 85% Afro-Colombian• Alongside one of the most bio-rich
areas in Colombia• Highly militarized (base, port, land) by
Colombian military and paramilitary
For more information see (2007) NY Times article: Cocaine Wars make Port Colombia’s Deadliest City
Some photos from around Buenaventura and Bahia Malaga
Videos of Solidarity from Colombia
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBSJMXqISmA (IPC Statement of Solidarity)
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=US3otnfeWv4 (The Cost of Consuming)
View of the IPC on the FTA“Free trade was implemented in Colombia in 1990…after twenty-one
years of experience there are more than enough reasons to oppose the current free trade agreement (FTA) between Colombia and the United States. First, because it seeks to further policies that replace domestic workers with foreign workers. Second, it destroys industrial and agricultural production. Third, it privatizes the public sector. Fourth, it hands over the main sectors of the economy to multinationals. Fifth, it puts the state at the service of plutocracy (or oligopolies) rather than democratic ideals. In summary, the evidence shows that “free trade,”as it is currently conceived, impoverishes nearly all Colombians and, worse, it snatches away our country’s ability to create wealth. Yes, Colombia must relate to the United States and the rest of the world, but not with mule and rider agreements that take away our national sovereignty and turn us into a kind of colony - an iniquitous condition from which we freed ourselves two hundred years ago.”
-From IPC Statement in 2010
More Informationwww.calledtocolombia.org
Blog of Mission Co-Workers Mamie Broadhurst and Richard Williams
They have a post entitled: Trade Policies—Different Perspectives with a snapshot of the many points of view about trade and links to many other articles.
Other posts:Colombian Trade—Colombian VoicesTrade: Free, Fair, or Just Plain Confusing?
How to Keep Up-to-Date on this Issue:
• Presbyterian Peace Fellowship www.presbypeacefellowship.org/Colombia/FTA
• Latin America Working Group lawg.org/component/content/article/76-stand-by-colombias-victims-of-violence/863-fta-statements-and-articles
God of hope - who consoles our pain.We have seen and heard the testimony of millions of displaced and refugees.Women, children, men, indigenous and afro descendents whose bodies carry
the marks of death and terror.
God of justice - who walks with us.Our faith and our commitment to Jesus has led us to solidarity and exile.Our bodies carry the scars of fear, violence, poverty and rejection – they are
our cross. God of life – who works with us for peace.Destroy the weapons of war and the trade agreements that displace and
destroy your creation.We are your people who yearn to return to our land and, like Jesus, be
resurrected.--Rev. Milton Mejia and Rev. Adelaida Jimenez
