1
Rats, Black Swans, an an Investigation of “G “Deviate from common Andreas 80 % 20 % Probability matching; success rate: 68 % A “didactic” system dynamics model Rats left Rats right Probability food Food left Food right Total food taken right increase food right Total food taken left increase food left PolicyGoingLeft Rats going left going right new rats Individual rationality does not 100 75 50 its 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 lead to high overall performance 50 25 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time (Hour) uni Total foot taken : RationalChoice100Rats 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Being diff Total foot taken : RationalChoice100Rats 1 1 1 1 1 Total foot taken : ProbabilityMatching100Rats 2 2 2 2 Total foot taken : HalfHalf100Rats 3 3 3 3 3 3 Total foot taken : Extraordinary100Rats 4 4 4 4 4 Total foot taken : Adapting100Rats 5 5 5 5 5 5 0.02 -0.135 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 ts Being diff quite succes -0.29 -0.445 -0.6 0 10 20 30 units/rat * Radboud University Nijmegen, Th The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win, you‘re still a rat DifferenceAverages : RationalChoice100Rats DifferenceAverages : ProbabilityMatching100R DifferenceAverages : HalfHalf100Rats DifferenceAverages : Extraordinary100Rats DifferenceAverages : Adapting100Rats * Radboud University Nijmegen, Th you‘re still a rat -- Lily Tomlin nd Personal Careers Go with the flow” and n behaviour” Strategies Größler* Inspiration: Gigerenzer , 2007 Gigerenzer , 2007 Brunswick, 1939 80 % 20 % 80 % 20 % Success rate: still 68 % per rat But: food is divided by number of rats. still 68 % per rat number of rats. If one rat goes to the right, chances are low, but if food is there, rat has it on its own. Policies tested: Rational choice Rational choice Probability matching Half-Half Extraordinary Adaptation ferent can be Analogy to General strategy Investment policy Personal career 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 ferent can be ssful (but is risky) Personal career planning Focused factory vs. “world class 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time (Hour) “world class manufacturing” he Netherlands, [email protected] Time (Hour) 1 1 1 1 Rats 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 he Netherlands, [email protected]

Poster Rat Race

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

My poster at the 2010 International System Dynamics Conference, Seoul.

Citation preview

Page 1: Poster Rat Race

Rats, Black Swans, and Personal Careers an Investigation of “Go with the flow” and

“Deviate from common behaviour” Strategies

Andreas Andreas

80 % 20 %

Probability matching;

success rate: 68 %

A “didactic” system dynamics model

Rats left Rats right

Probability food

Food left Food right

Total foodtaken right

increase

food right

Total foodtaken left increase food left

PolicyGoingLeft

A “didactic” system dynamics model

Rats

going left going right

new rats

Individual rationality does not

100

75

50

units 5

5

5

5

4

4

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

Individual rationality does not

lead to high overall performance

50

25

0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Time (Hour)

units

Total foot taken : RationalChoice100Rats 1 1 1 1 1

5

5

5

5

5

4

4

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

Being different can be Total foot taken : RationalChoice100Rats 1 1 1 1 1

Total foot taken : ProbabilityMatching100Rats 2 2 2 2

Total foot taken : HalfHalf100Rats 3 3 3 3 3 3

Total foot taken : Extraordinary100Rats 4 4 4 4 4

Total foot taken : Adapting100Rats 5 5 5 5 5 5

0.02

-0.135

5 5 5

4

44

3 3 32

2 21 1 1 1

rats

Being different can be

quite successful (but is risky)

-0.29

-0.445

-0.6

0 10 20 30

units/rats

* Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands, [email protected]

The trouble with

the rat race is that

even if you win,

you‘re still a rat

DifferenceAverages : RationalChoice100Rats

DifferenceAverages : ProbabilityMatching100Rats

DifferenceAverages : HalfHalf100Rats

DifferenceAverages : Extraordinary100Rats

DifferenceAverages : Adapting100Rats

* Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands, [email protected] you‘re still a rat

-- Lily Tomlin

Rats, Black Swans, and Personal Careers –an Investigation of “Go with the flow” and

“Deviate from common behaviour” Strategies

Andreas Größler*Andreas Größler*

Inspiration:

Gigerenzer, 2007Gigerenzer, 2007

Brunswick, 1939

80 % 20 %80 % 20 %

Success rate:

still 68 % per rat

But: food is divided by

number of rats.still 68 % per rat number of rats.

If one rat goes to the right,

chances are low, but if food

is there, rat has it on its own.

Policies tested:

• Rational choice• Rational choice

• Probability matching

• Half-Half

• Extraordinary• Extraordinary

• Adaptation

Being different can be

Analogy to

• General strategy

• Investment policy

• Personal career

5 5 5 5 5

4

4 44 4

3 3 3 3 32 2 2 2 2 21 1 1 1 1 1

Being different can be

quite successful (but is risky)• Personal career

planning

• Focused factory vs.

“world class

40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Time (Hour)

“world class

manufacturing”

University Nijmegen, The Netherlands, [email protected]

Time (Hour)

1 1 1 1

: ProbabilityMatching100Rats 2 2 2 2

3 3 3 3 3

4 4 4 4 4

5 5 5 5 5 5

University Nijmegen, The Netherlands, [email protected]