25
WHAT ?

Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Organizational Effectiveness (OE) approach within Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI) involves surfacing issues that span multiple functions through questions, discussion and dialog. We then empower passionate people from across our company to work together to affect positive change.

Citation preview

Page 1: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

WHAT ?

Page 2: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment
Page 3: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

OE =Old EnglishOtitis ExternaöOrganizational Effectiveness

Page 4: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

= what?

Page 5: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

What happens

when you start asking questions?

Page 6: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

People have important conversations.

Page 7: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

Profitability

Positive change

Productivity

= Solutions Important conversations People+

Page 8: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

= You talk about what matters to you

Important conversations People+

MeYou

Listen.

Discuss it together, across functions, at all levels.

Make decisions.

Change our company for the better. We

Page 9: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

WHAT ? SO...

Page 10: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

simplicity compliance

speed

growth mindset

impact not perfection

engagementemployees

Involvementquality

diversity

That’s the idea!

Money saved Learning

Time saved

Connections between people

Page 11: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

Take VTI Day. We had one mission,

two themes and great results:

Talk. Listen. Solve.• 1800 webcast viewers • 176 contributions across 5 ‘As I See It’ threads• 1300 feedback cards • 1 great video with 100 employee contributors• 14 functional areas from 4 OPUs• 1 self-identified project leader • and 8 self-identified team members

Page 12: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

What do they mean? • The project lead, Christine Davis, got valuable

experience and hours she could apply toward her professional certification in project management.

• The project was completed on-time, in-scope and under-budget.

• Everyone participated. • And the conversation is still going.

180014

1761300

100150

… but what’sbehind the

VTI Day numbers?

Page 13: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

“ It turned out that my BI title didn’t matter… the experience fit with my talent and what I want to do in my career.” – Christine Davis, VTI Day project lead

and Specialist, Trial Documentation

Page 14: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

Another example is an Alignment & Efficiency project that took on ways to improve

in large-scale initiatives within the Enabling Functions.

cross-functional collaboration

Page 15: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

• Full transparency• Earlier communication• Decision-making at the right level,

by the right people • Strategic prioritization• A process for sharing goals… across all Enabling Functions

initiatives.

The results? • A new Enabling Functions Initiative

Board (EFIB) • Standardized key planning information

for large-scale initiatives• Annual cross-functional goal-setting

Alignment & Efficiency project goals:

Page 16: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

“ Sometimes people feel that they can only improve what they can do, but things can’t change at the top… this is an example where senior leaders… are very open to change.” – Hillary Wilson, Enabling Functions

project lead and Brand Business Operations

Page 17: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

OnboardingThe volunteer team took a look at the

Onboarding process to identify pain points and recommend improvements.

And yet another example of Alignment & Efficiency in OE:

Page 18: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

Now, they’re connected and sharing ideas…

When we started, the OE network discovered that

many OPUs and functions were working to improve Onboarding.

And as a result, they’re saving time and money.

Page 19: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

Onboarding Phase 1 is complete, and phase 2 is underway.

Our goal:• Speed up the process to get

new employees acclimated • Get them the tools they need

to start working• Create a connected, cohesive

onboarding experience

More to come…

Page 20: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

Across OE, participants are seeing the benefits – and have ideas about what it can accomplish:

These are real quotes from an anonymous survey of OE participants.

“ Through OE people speak up without complaining, focus on real causes, take a systemic view, and work across silos more effectively.”

“ Working with people that want to change something.”

“ OE is evidence that you could motivate a large group of people to go above and beyond without extra infrastructure, money.”

That everyone is willing to step forward and be a part of a solution – don’t complain – make the company better.

We seek simplicity and clarity – understand the input to the output before taking actions.

We become more effective working across functions or businesses and recognize it’s all connected…

Page 21: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

NOW WHAT?

Page 22: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

This is your workplace.

Page 23: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

You have control.

Page 24: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

OE = So how do you want to

get involved?How can you affect change?

MeYou

We

Page 25: Organizational Effectiveness 2013 Impact Assessment

Join the conversation today!

Visit http://bi-oe to find out how...